Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Effects of Paternal Predation Risk and Rearing Environment on Maternal Investment and Development of Defensive Responses in the Offspring

Austin C. Korgan, Elizabeth O’Leary, Jessica Bauer, Aidan Fortier, Ian C. G. Weaver and Tara S. Perrot
eNeuro 9 November 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0231-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0231-16.2016
Austin C. Korgan
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Austin C. Korgan
Elizabeth O’Leary
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elizabeth O’Leary
Jessica Bauer
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aidan Fortier
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Aidan Fortier
Ian C. G. Weaver
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
2Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Brain Repair Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ian C. G. Weaver
Tara S. Perrot
1Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
3Brain Repair Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 4R2, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental timelines and avoidance behavior in males during odor exposure. A, Timeline of treatment procedures involving F0 males. During OE1, males were exposed to either PO or CO for 30 min, three times per day for 7 d beginning 24 d prior to mating. OE2 was conducted identically except that the CO and PO exposures began 7 d prior to mating. Males from OE1 and OE2 were subjected to a PPT using sexually receptive virgin, naive females. Within 12 h of the PPT, males were bred with different receptive naive virgin females. Following confirmed mating, males were removed, and females were left undisturbed until offspring were born. B, Timeline of treatment procedures for F0 females and the F1 offspring. Birth was considered P0, and offspring were counted, sexed, and weighed before being transferred to either fresh SH or SNH, with biological mothers, until weaning. Maternal behavior (Mat Care) was scored for 1 h, five times per day for 7 d. At P21, all offspring were weighed, weaned, and placed in SH with a same-sex littermate. Play behavior was recorded in the home cage from P24 to P29, followed by exposure to the OFT and the EPM on P32 to P35. F1 OE took place on P42 with male and female offspring being exposed to either PO or CO for 30 min and then killed. Sample sizes are provided for both the F0 and F1 groups. C, Avoidance behavior in F0 male rats was significantly increased in those exposed to PO relative to those exposed to CO during OE. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. **p ≤ 0.005, PO different from CO.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Use of a PPT to ascertain female preference for males previously exposed to PO relative to CO. A, Schematic representation of the T-maze used for the PPT. Males were placed in the ends of arms confined by Plexiglas shields containing many holes. B, C, Female rats spent less time in the vicinity of PO-exposed males relative to CO-exposed males during the last 4 min of a partner preference test, both 1 and 17 d after the odor exposure had occurred in males. The percentage of time spent with males was calculated as the percentage of time spent with either a CO or PO male per total time spent with both CO and PO males. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, PO different from CO.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Maternal behaviors of females housed in SNH or SH raising offspring of mates that were exposed to either PO or CO. A, Frequency of various maternal behaviors [PC, passive contact (with pups); ABN1, arched-back nursing 1 (blanket posture); 2, arched-back nursing 2; 3, arched-back nursing 3; 4, arched back nursing 4; NB, nest building; SG, self-groom (auto-groom); PR, pup retrieval] displayed by females housed in SH and SNH, collapsed across paternal condition. The inset shows schematics of the housing conditions; the SNH includes a lower burrow compartment (contained within a drawer that moves out to facilitate cleaning) and an upper section (containing food and water), with the two sections being connected by a hole (visible in the upper section). B, The frequency of LG-ABN2 behaviors was significantly increased in dams raising offspring in SNH relative to those housed in SH, but only if offspring were from PO exposed males. C, The frequency of LG-ABN3 behavior was increased in dams living in SNH relative to SH, regardless of paternal experience. D, Living in SNH reduced pup mortality relative to living in SH. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05, SNH different from SH; **p ≤ 0.005, SNH different from SH.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Weaning weight and social behavior of juvenile offspring raised by females housed in SNH or SH and sired by males exposed to either PO or CO. A, SNH rearing significantly increased weaning weight in both male and female offspring, regardless of paternal experience, with males overall weighing more than females. B, Increased social grooming occurred in female offspring, compared with male offspring, and was higher in offspring reared in SH relative to those reared in SNH. C, Males engaged in significantly more play attacks than females. D, Males also engaged in significantly more play defend behaviors relative to females. E, Evading behavior in response to play attacks was decreased overall in offspring reared in SNH relative to SH, but more specifically, CO-SH-reared offspring evaded more than PO-SH- and CO-SNH-reared offspring. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Difference between indicated groups: *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.005.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Development of fear- and anxiety-like behavior in the offspring raised by females housed in SNH or SH and sired by males exposed to either PO or CO. A, Center time in the open-field test was increased (indicative of reduced anxiety-like behavior) in offspring raised in SNH relative to those reared in SH. B, In the EPM, female offspring spent more time in the open arms relative to males. C, Overall, in the EPM, female offspring displayed less anxiety (more frequent open arm entry) than males, and, in particular, females of either the CO-SNH or PO-SH group displayed reduced anxiety relative to other groups. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Interaction: difference between indicated groups, *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.005.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Effects of 30 min exposure to either CO (F1CO) or PO (F1PO) on behavior and hypothalamic crf gene regulation of offspring raised by females housed in SNH or SH and sired by males exposed to either PO (F0PO) or CO (F0CO). A, Rearing duration was not significantly different in F1PO versus F1CO males, nor was it affected by paternal or maternal condition. B, Likewise, rearing frequency was not significantly affected by short-term exposure to PO or paternal or maternal condition in males. B, C, Both rear duration (C) and rear frequency (D) were lower in F1PO-exposed females relative to F1CO-exposed females. Beyond the main effect, rearing frequency and duration were increased in all female offspring (exposed in the short term to CO or PO) of CO fathers and mothers housed in SNH. E, Diagrammatic representation (left) and representative photomicrographs (10× objective) of DAPI-stained coronal sections showing the dissection site (white circle/arrow) in micropunched (middle) and intact (right) PVN tissue, in relation to the third ventricle (3V). F–H, H3K9ac enrichment of the crf promoter in PVN was increased in F0PO relative to F0CO offspring (F), reduced in offspring raised in SNH relative to those raised in SH (G), and increased in F1PO offspring relative to F1CO offspring (H). I, Levels crf primary transcript (hnRNA) in PVN were also increased in F1PO offspring relative to F1CO offspring. J, Levels of H3K9ac enrichment of the crf promoter and hnRNA expression were positively correlated in F1CO and F1PO offspring. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Difference between indicated groups, *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.005. Scale bar, 200 μm.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 6
November/December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effects of Paternal Predation Risk and Rearing Environment on Maternal Investment and Development of Defensive Responses in the Offspring
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Effects of Paternal Predation Risk and Rearing Environment on Maternal Investment and Development of Defensive Responses in the Offspring
Austin C. Korgan, Elizabeth O’Leary, Jessica Bauer, Aidan Fortier, Ian C. G. Weaver, Tara S. Perrot
eNeuro 9 November 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0231-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0231-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Effects of Paternal Predation Risk and Rearing Environment on Maternal Investment and Development of Defensive Responses in the Offspring
Austin C. Korgan, Elizabeth O’Leary, Jessica Bauer, Aidan Fortier, Ian C. G. Weaver, Tara S. Perrot
eNeuro 9 November 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0231-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0231-16.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Chromatin Plasticity
  • CRF
  • hypothalamus
  • Maternal Care
  • Paternal Effects
  • Predator Stress

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Development

  • Early Development of Hypothalamic Neurons Expressing Proopiomelanocortin Peptides, Neuropeptide Y and Kisspeptin in Fetal Rhesus Macaques
  • Lactate Receptor HCAR1 Affects Axonal Development and Contributes to Lactate’s Protection of Axons and Myelin in Experimental Neonatal Hypoglycemia
  • Caliber of Rohon–Beard Touch-Sensory Axons Is Dynamic In Vivo
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.