Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

Regulation of Physical Microglia–Neuron Interactions by Fractalkine Signaling after Status Epilepticus

Ukpong B. Eyo, Jiyun Peng, Madhuvika Murugan, Mingshu Mo, Almin Lalani, Ping Xie, Pingyi Xu, David J. Margolis and Long-Jun Wu
eNeuro 29 December 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0209-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0209-16.2016
Ukpong B. Eyo
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ukpong B. Eyo
Jiyun Peng
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jiyun Peng
Madhuvika Murugan
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Madhuvika Murugan
Mingshu Mo
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
3Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangdong, 510120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mingshu Mo
Almin Lalani
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ping Xie
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pingyi Xu
3Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangdong, 510120, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David J. Margolis
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J. Margolis
Long-Jun Wu
1Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854
2Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Long-Jun Wu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Movies
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental seizures trigger microglial process convergence (MPCs). a, Seizure scores after intraperitoneal delivery of pilocarpine (300 mg/kg) and kainic acid (18–22 mg/kg). b–d, Representative images of MPCs in acute slices from mice after kainic acid treatment. c, d, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in b showing converging microglial process foci identified with white arrows. e, Quantitation of MPCs under control, pilocarpine, and kainic acid treatment (n = 9–14 slices each). f, g, Ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists and action potential blockers fail to block pilocarpine- (f) or kainic acid– (g) induced MPCs (n = 5–9 slices each). h, NMDA receptor antagonism during kainic acid–induced seizures reduces MPCs (n = 8–12 slices each). i–k, Representative images of MPCs in vivo from mice after kainic acid treatment. j, k, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in i showing MPC foci identified with white arrows. l, Quantification of MPCs in vivo after kainic acid–induced seizures (n = 4–5 mice each). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Transient glutamate treatment mimics seizure-induced MPCs. a–c, Images from a time-lapse sequence showing converging microglial processes in a slice after glutamate (10 mm) treatment for 10 min. b, c, Time-lapse images of boxed regions in a showing converging microglial processes foci identified with white arrows. d, e, Schematic of sites of process convergence events (d) and quantified summary (e) showing increased occurrence after glutamate treatment (red arrowhead in e, n = 3 slices each). f, g, Quantification of the number of process convergence events under different conditions showing a role for NMDA receptors (n = 5–14 slices each). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001 compared with control and #p < 0.01 compared with previous condition in the respective graphs.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Characteristics of glutamate-induced MPCs. a–d, Schematic representation (a, c) and quantitative summary (b, d) showing the occurrence of MPC events at various glutamate concentrations for 10 min (a, b) and various time points at 1 mm (c, d). n = 6–11 slices each. e, f, Microglia respond from similar distances in all conditions of glutamate exposure tested. Glutamate-induced MPCs show similar features in the different conditions. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 compared with control.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Neurons respond functionally to multiple hits of glutamate. Images (a, b) and time series (a′, b′) data showing intracellular calcium transients in neuronal somata (top) and dendrites (bottom) from GCaMP2.2 mouse slices after repeated glutamate (1 mm) treatment in cortical layer II/III.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Comparison between calcium reduction–induced and glutamate-induced MPCs. a–c, Quantitative summary of MPC events in slices from wild-type and P2Y12-deficient mice after pilocarpine-induced seizures (a), kainic acid–induced seizures (b) and 10-min glutamate treatment (c) (n = 3–7 slices each). d, Example of a converging microglial (green) process (arrow) terminating on a neuronal dendrite (red) after glutamate treatment in a slice from a double transgenic CX3CR1GFP/+:Thy1YFP/+ mouse. f, g, Schematic representation of sites of convergence foci (f) and quantitative summary data (g) showing sites and number of cells that respond during the different treatments. h–j, Various features of MPCs are similar between the two methods of convergence (n = 6–12 slices each). ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Fractalkine signaling is necessary and sufficient to trigger MPCs. a, b, Images from a time-lapse sequence (a) and summary schematic (b) showing converging microglial processes in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP after glutamate treatment. c–f, Quantification of MPC numbers in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP after glutamate treatment (c), kainic acid–induced seizures (d), and pilocarpine-induced seizures (e) showing reduced events in CX3CR1GFP/GFP slices as well as under basal conditions (f; n = 7–13 slices each). g–i, Quantified summary of MPC numbers after CX3CL1 (200 ng/mL) application in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ (g, h) and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (i) mice (n = 6–8 slices each). ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Glutamate-induced MPCs requires IL-1β. a–c, Quantified summary (a, c) and schematic representation (b) showing that IL-1β (30 ng/mL) increases MPCs in slices from both CX3CR1GFP/+ and CX3CR1GFP/GFP mice (n = 6–17 slices). d, CX3CL1-induced MPCs is blocked by IL-1ra (100 ng/mL), an IL-1β antagonist, in slices from CX3CR1GFP/+ mice (n = 8–9 slices each). e–g, Glutamate-induced MPCs fails to occur in the presence of function-blocking CX3CL1 antibodies and is reduced in the presence of IL-1ra (n = 10–12 slices each). **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Neuroprotective potential of MPCs. a, b, Behavioral seizure scores in aged-matched wild type (n = 7), CX3CR1GFP/+ (n = 11), and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (n = 9) mice treated with kainic acid through time (a) and on average (b). c, Pie chart showing the percentage of mice from the seizure experiments that progressed to at least stage 3 seizures (red) along the Racine scale during the 2 h of seizure monitoring after kainic acid treatment. ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Model for glutamate-induced MPCs by fractalkine receptor–dependent signaling through IL-1β. Our results suggest a bidirectional mechanism of MPC in which (1) excessive glutamate release (2) activates neuronal NMDA receptors, which results in (3) the release of fractalkine from neuronal membranes that activates microglial fractalkine receptors. (4) Fractalkine receptor activation subsequently triggers IL-1β release from microglia, which in turn increases neuronal excitability to elicit (5) a localized release of ATP at specific dendritic hotspots. Finally, (6) ATP released from these hotspots attracts microglial processes via P2Y12 receptor to converge at the release site.

Movies

  • Figures
  • Movie 1.

    Microglial process convergence occurs after seizures. Representative time-lapse movies taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ mouse slices showing MPCs events. Slices were generated from the brains of mice 2 h after kainic acid treatment. Several MPCs events are identified (white arrows). This movie is 140 min long and is sped up 120×.

  • Movie 2.

    Glutamate induces MPCs. Representative time-lapse movie taken from slices excised from a CX3CR1GFP/+ mouse previously exposed to 10 min of 1 mm glutamate. Three MPC events can be seen in different regions of the slice and are identified with white arrows. This movie is 75 min long and is sped up 180×.

  • Movie 3.

    Glutamate-induced MPCs targets neuronal dendrites. Representative time-lapse movie taken from slices excised from a CX3CR1GFP/+;Thy1YFP/+ mouse previously exposed to 10 min of glutamate. A microglial process (green) convergence event terminating on a labeled dendrite (red) is identified with a white arrow. This movie is 48 min long and is sped up 240×.

  • Movie 4.

    Microglial process convergence in fractalkine receptor heterozygote (left) and knockout (right) slices after glutamate treatment. Representative time-lapse movie taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ (i.e., CX3CR1+/–, left) and CX3CR1GFP/GFP (i.e., CX3CR1–/–, right) slices showing several MPC events (arrows) after a 10-min glutamate (1 mm) treatment. This movie is 30 min long and is sped up 180×.

  • Movie 5.

    IL-1β increases MPCs. Representative time-lapse movie taken from CX3CR1GFP/+ showing that IL-1β (30 ng/mL) increases the occurrence of MPCs (arrows). This movie is 70 min long and is sped up 180×.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 6
November/December 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of Physical Microglia–Neuron Interactions by Fractalkine Signaling after Status Epilepticus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Regulation of Physical Microglia–Neuron Interactions by Fractalkine Signaling after Status Epilepticus
Ukpong B. Eyo, Jiyun Peng, Madhuvika Murugan, Mingshu Mo, Almin Lalani, Ping Xie, Pingyi Xu, David J. Margolis, Long-Jun Wu
eNeuro 29 December 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0209-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0209-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Regulation of Physical Microglia–Neuron Interactions by Fractalkine Signaling after Status Epilepticus
Ukpong B. Eyo, Jiyun Peng, Madhuvika Murugan, Mingshu Mo, Almin Lalani, Ping Xie, Pingyi Xu, David J. Margolis, Long-Jun Wu
eNeuro 29 December 2016, 3 (6) ENEURO.0209-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0209-16.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • epilepsy
  • Fractalkine
  • glutamate
  • interleukin-1β
  • microglia
  • seizure

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
  • Variation in the Involvement of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cell Subtypes in Spatial Learning Tasks
  • Dentate Granule Cell Capacitance Is Stable across the Light/Dark Cycle
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.