Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Type II Cochlear Ganglion Neurons Do Not Drive the Olivocochlear Reflex: Re-Examination of the Cochlear Phenotype in Peripherin Knock-Out Mice

Stéphane Maison, Leslie D. Liberman and M. Charles Liberman
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0207-16.2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0207-16.2016
Stéphane Maison
1Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
2Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stéphane Maison
Leslie D. Liberman
2Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Leslie D. Liberman
M. Charles Liberman
1Department of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
2Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Charles Liberman
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A, B, Anti-peripherin (red) immunostains the cell bodies of type II SGNs in Prph+/+ ears (A) but not in Prph−/− (B), confirming the null expression in the knockout. Each image is a maximum projection of a confocal z-stack through the apical turn. Antibodies to β-tubulin (TuJ1; green) stain the cell bodies of type I SGNs, and myosin VIIa is used to stain hair cells (blue). Scale bar: B (for A, B), 100 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    In the organ of Corti, peripherin weakly stains the peripheral projections of type II SGNs, while it strongly stains a subset of MOC efferents. A, Thin outer spiral fibers (green arrowheads) in the outer spiral bundles are immunopositive for β-tubulin (TuJ1), as are thick MOC fibers running radially across the tunnel of Corti. Some of MOC fibers are also positive for peripherin (green-rimmed red arrowheads). Peripherin also strongly stains MOC fibers in the inner spiral bundle (ISB) and, rarely, a thin type II projection running diagonally across the floor of the tunnel (red arrowhead). B, Antibodies to synaptophysin (blue) and Na+/K+ ATPase (green) identify the thick tunnel-crossing fibers as MOC neurons, a subset of which are peripherin positive (green-rimmed red arrowhead). An occasional thin type II projection is also peripherin positive (red arrowhead). Images are maximum projections from the 11.3 kHz region of two different wild-type animals. Scale bar: A (for A, B), 20 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Immunostaining for parvalbumin (which stains type II terminals and outer spiral fibers green) and vesicular acetylcholine transporter (which stains MOC terminals blue) suggests that both afferent and efferent innervations are normal in Prph−/− ears. A, B, Maximum projections of confocal z-stacks from the 16 kHz region of a Prph−/− ear (A) and a Prph+/+ ear (B), shown in the acquisition plane (x–y) and in the orthogonal plane (z–y) showing a cross-sectional view, as schematized in C. The dotted box in C shows the approximate region imaged in A and B. Green-filled and blue-filled arrowheads in A and B highlight the spatially offset clusters of type II and olivocochlear terminals, respectively, underneath the third-row OHCs. White arrowheads in Azy and Bzy point to the three outer spiral bundles (OSBs) running between the Deiter’s cells. Scale bar: Bzy (for all panels), 20 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Type II terminals are apposed to presynaptic ribbons in Prph−/− and Prph+/+ ears. A, B, Maximum projections of confocal z-stacks from the 11.3 kHz region of a knock-out and a wild-type ear, shown in the acquisition plane (x–y) and the orthogonal plane (z–y; Fig. 3C ). Green-filled, red-rimmed arrowheads point to appositions between (parvalbumin-positive) type II terminals and (CtBP2-positive) presynaptic ribbons. Red-filled, white-rimmed arrowheads in the z–y projections point to nonsynaptic ribbons. Scale bar and immunostaining keys apply to all panels. Dashed white boxes in the z–y projections show the z-cropping used to generate the x–y projections.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    A, B, Quantitative analysis shows that the afferent (A) and efferent (B) innervation of OHCs is similar in Prph−/− and Prph+/+ ears. A, Mean ribbon counts and synaptic ribbon counts per OHC (±SEM) as a function of cochlear location. B, Mean silhouette area of MOC terminals per OHC (±SEM) as a function of cochlear location. Both graphs are based on data from four cochleae, two of each genotype. Each point is based on data from four high-power z-stacks, each containing ∼25 OHCs.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Cochlear thresholds are similar in Prph−/− and Prph+/+ ears. Data are the means (±SEMs) from eight ears of either genotype.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Shock-evoked MOC suppression is absent in Prph−/− ears. A, Schematic cross-section through the brainstem at the level of the lateral superior olive (LSO) and medial superior olive (MSO), showing (1) the cell bodies of MOC neurons projecting to one ear (ipsilateral), (2) the circuit underlying the sound-evoked MOC reflex, and (3) the location of the electrical stimulator at the floor of the fourth ventricle. B, Mean time course of the changes in DPOAE amplitude (compared with mean preshock baseline) evoked by a 70 s shock train to the OC bundle. Data are averaged from four WT and two KO ears. DPOAEs in the ipsilateral ear were evoked with primary tones at 16.0 kHz (f2) and 13.33 kHz (f1), presented at levels evoking a DPOAE 10 dB above the noise floor. C, Mean shock-evoked suppression in DPOAE amplitudes for f2 = 16 or 22.6 kHz for Prph−/− vs. Prph+/+ ears (n = 2 and n = 4, respectively). To collapse traces such as those in B to a single number, we average, for each test iteration, the first three points after shock onset.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 4
July/August 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Type II Cochlear Ganglion Neurons Do Not Drive the Olivocochlear Reflex: Re-Examination of the Cochlear Phenotype in Peripherin Knock-Out Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Type II Cochlear Ganglion Neurons Do Not Drive the Olivocochlear Reflex: Re-Examination of the Cochlear Phenotype in Peripherin Knock-Out Mice
Stéphane Maison, Leslie D. Liberman, M. Charles Liberman
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0207-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0207-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Type II Cochlear Ganglion Neurons Do Not Drive the Olivocochlear Reflex: Re-Examination of the Cochlear Phenotype in Peripherin Knock-Out Mice
Stéphane Maison, Leslie D. Liberman, M. Charles Liberman
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0207-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0207-16.2016
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • olivocochlear reflex
  • feedback
  • peripherin
  • hair cells
  • cochlea

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • Heterozygous Dab1 null mutation disrupts neocortical and hippocampal development
  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • The nasal solitary chemosensory cell signaling pathway triggers mouse avoidance behavior to inhaled nebulized irritants
  • Different control strategies drive interlimb differences in performance and adaptation during reaching movements in novel dynamics
  • Taste-odor association learning alters the dynamics of intra-oral odor responses in the posterior piriform cortex of awake rats
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.