Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Presynaptic GABA Receptors Mediate Temporal Contrast Enhancement in Drosophila Olfactory Sensory Neurons and Modulate Odor-Driven Behavioral Kinetics

Davide Raccuglia, Li Yan McCurdy, Mahmut Demir, Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya, Michael Kunst, Thierry Emonet and Michael N. Nitabach
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0080-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0080-16.2016
Davide Raccuglia
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Davide Raccuglia
Li Yan McCurdy
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
2Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Li Yan McCurdy
Mahmut Demir
3Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya
2Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Kunst
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thierry Emonet
3Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
4Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thierry Emonet
Michael N. Nitabach
1Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
5Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
6Program in Cellular Neuroscience, Neurodegeneration and Repair, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Increasing odor concentrations induces sustained peripheral OSN responses. A, An OSN depicting the dendrites and cell body in the antenna and the presynaptic axon terminals in the antennal lobe. The circle indicates focus on odor-elicited activity in the dendrites and cell body. B, Extracellular SSRs of action potentials in an ab3 sensillum, which contains OR22a-expressing OSNs. One second pulses of Eb of the indicated gas-phase dilutions were delivered during the indicated interval (yellow box). Recordings are representative of those obtained from four flies and 10 sensilla per concentration. C, Comparison between the spontaneous and postpulse firing rate at 1.5 s after odor pulse offset shows sustained firing for odor intensities of ≥1:5. Mean ± SEM; n = 4. Statistical analysis: one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with Dunn’s post hoc test (spontaneous firing as control); *p < 0.05. D, Mean firing rates (n = 4 flies) of a neuron recorded in ab3 sensilla of ArcLight-expressing flies. E, Mean firing rates (n = 4 flies) of a neuron recorded in ab3 sensilla of Canton S flies. F, Representative odor signals measured at the outlet of the odor delivery system using a PID. G, OR22a-OSNs expressing ArcLight display reduced spontaneous and odor-induced peak firing rates compared with wild-type OR22a-OSNs (Canton S). Data from D and E were averaged across concentrations. Statistical analysis: unpaired t test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. H, Mean LFP (n = 3) of ab3 sensilla in w1118 flies showing sustained neuronal activity.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Optical electrophysiology reveals sustained peripheral OSN responses. A, Combined fluorescent and transmitted light image of the antenna of a fly expressing ArcLight in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Scale bars, 20 µm. B–E, Simultaneous SSR of ab3 and voltage imaging of the antenna of three flies expressing ArcLight in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Representative PID signals are shown and were measured ∼2–4 mm behind the fly. Yellow boxes indicate odor pulse duration. F, Mean ArcLight signals (n = 4) in response to 1 s Eb pulses at the indicated gas-phase dilutions. G, Mean PID signals for the odor pulses in F, measured at the fly.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Optical electrophysiology of presynaptic axon terminals of OSNs indicates temporal contrast enhancement. A, Fluorescent image of the antennal lobe of a fly expressing ArcLight in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Scale bars, 10 µm. The axon terminals of these neurons innervate the DM2 glomerulus. B, Single-trial optical recording of presynaptic membrane potential in DM2 in response to pulses of 1:5 Eb, measured with the PID at the fly. Yellow boxes indicate odor pulse duration. C, Mean presynaptic electrical responses (n = 5–11) in DM2 to 1 s Eb pulses of the indicated gas-phase dilutions. D, Mean PID signals for the odor pulses in C, measured at the fly. E, Fluorescent image of the antennal lobe of a fly expressing GCaMP6F in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Scale bar, 10 µm. F, Mean presynaptic Ca2+ responses (n = 4–5) in DM2 to 1 s Eb pulses of the gas-phase dilutions indicated in C. G, Mean PID signals for the odor pulses in F, measured at the fly. H, Sharpness coefficient based on peak amplitude [(ΔF/F)Max − (ΔF/F)1.5 s postpulse]/(ΔF/F)Max of OSN voltage and Ca2+ responses in the antenna and AL. Sharpness of antennal voltage and presynaptic Ca2+ responses decreases with increasing odor concentration, while presynaptic voltage responses remain sharp, indicating the existence of a mechanism for temporal contrast enhancement of presynaptic electrical responses. Mean ± SEM; n = 4 for antennal voltage, n = 4-5 for presynaptic Ca2+, and n = 5-11 for presynaptic voltage. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test (antennal voltage as control); **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. I, Sharpness coefficient based on neuronal activity at odor offset [(ΔF/F or Hz)offset − (ΔF/F or Hz)1.5 s postpulse]/(ΔF/F or Hz)offset comparing presynaptic voltage and peripheral firing rate of OSNs also indicates presynaptic contrast enhancement. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test; *p < 0.05. J, Fluorescent image of the antenna of a fly expressing ArcLight in OR42b-expressing OSNs. Scale bars, 10 µm. K, Mean peripheral electrical responses (n = 4) in OR42b-expressing neurons to 1 s Eb pulses of the indicated gas-phase dilutions. L, Fluorescent image of the antennal lobe of a fly expressing ArcLight in OR42b-expressing OSNs. Scale bar, 10 µm. The axon terminals of these neurons innervate the DM1 glomerulus. M, Mean presynaptic electrical responses (n = 6) in DM1 to 1 s Eb pulses of the indicated gas-phase dilutions. N, Sharpness coefficient of peripheral voltage is reduced at high odor concentrations (1:5, 1:1), while presynaptic voltage responses remain sharp. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Temporal contrast enhancement in OSN presynaptic terminals is mediated by GABAA and GABAB receptors. A, Pharmacological inhibition of GABAB receptors with CGP54626 has no effect on presynaptic electrical responses of OR22a-expressing OSNs in DM2 to a 1 s pulse of 1:5 Eb. Mean ± SEM; n = 5. B, Pharmacological inhibition of GABAA receptors with PTX appears to slightly increase magnitude and prolong presynaptic electrical responses in DM2 to 1 s pulses of 1:5 Eb. Mean ± SEM; n = 5. C–F, Simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of GABAA and GABAB receptors increases magnitude and prolongs presynaptic electrical responses in DM2 to 1 s pulses of 1:5 (C) and 1:3 (E) Eb. Simultaneously recorded PID signals are identical before and after drug application (D, F). Mean ± SEM; n = 9. G, Maximum presynaptic voltage responses indicate that only simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of GABAA and GABAB receptors significantly increases the magnitude of voltage responses. Mean ± SEM; n = 5 for CGP54626, n = 5 for PTX, and n = 9 for CGP54626+PTX. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, ***p < 0.001. H, Sharpness coefficient indicates that only simultaneous inhibition of GABAA and GABAB receptors significantly reduces the temporal contrast enhancement of presynaptic voltage responses. The sharpness of responses to 1:3 Eb is reduced significantly more than that to 1:5 Eb, which is consistent with the larger sustained peripheral response to 1:3 Eb (Fig. 2F). Mean ± SEM; n = 5 for CGP54626, n = 5 for PTX and n = 9 for CGP54626+PTX. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. I, Removal of the antennae reduces lateral inhibition of the maxillary palp glomerulus VM7 (Olsen and Wilson, 2008). In response to 1:5 Eb, removal of the antennae increases presynaptic voltage responses and reduces sharpness. Mean ± SEM; n = 7. Statistical analysis: paired t test, *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Temporal contrast enhancement in OSN presynaptic terminals is mediated by presynaptic GABAA and GABAB receptors as demonstrated by cell-specific RNAi-mediated knockdown. A, Maximum presynaptic voltage responses are increased by individual and simultaneous RNAi-mediated knockdown of GABAA (8-10G) and GABAB receptors. Mean ± SEM; n = 8. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test (asterisks are color coded to indicate pairwise comparisons vs control), *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. B, Temporal contrast enhancement of DM2 presynaptic voltage responses is unaffected by RNAi-mediated knockdown of either GABAA (8-10G) or GABAB receptors individually in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Simultaneous knockdown of GABAA (8-10G) and GABAB receptors reduces temporal contrast enhancement at odor intensities of 1:5 and higher. Mean ± SEM; n = 8. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. C, E, G, I, Presynaptic DM2 voltage responses to 1 s Eb pulses of gas-phase dilutions 1:25 (C), 1:5 (E), 1:3 (G), and 1:1 (I) in flies expressing either, or both, GABAA (8-10G) and GABAB-RNAi in OR22a-expressing OSNs. Mean ± SEM; n = 8-10. D, F, H, J, Time-dependent sharpness coefficient to analyze the time window in which GABA receptor knockdown affects contrast enhancement. After a 1:25 pulse (D) knockdown of GABAB receptors and simultaneous knockdown of GABAA (8-10G) and GABAB receptors affect sharpness during the hyperpolarization phase immediately after odor offset. Knockdown of GABAA receptors leads an increase in postpulse hyperpolarization for 1:25 (D), 1:5 (F), and 1:3 (H). Contrast enhancement of sustained activity later than 1 s after the odor offset is only achieved by simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors in OR22a-expressing OSNs, indicating a combined role for these receptors. Statistical analysis: two-way repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Presynaptic OSN GABA receptors affect innate olfactory attraction and avoidance. A, B, Representative trajectories of control flies (PDF-RNAi) in the olfactory arena. The white dot indicates the position of the fly at the beginning of the 10 s odor pulse. The odor enters the arena from the top odor port. Trajectories indicate movement toward the odor port during a 10 s 1:125 Eb pulse (A), and away from the odor port during a 1:1 Eb pulse (B). C, D, Behavioral responses to 10 s 1:125 (C) and 1:25 (D) Eb pulses. We defined Δdt as the difference in distance from the odor port between odor onset and time t (Δdt = d0 − dt ), such that positive Δdt values reflect movement toward the odor port (i.e, attraction) and negative values reflect movement away (i.e., avoidance). Control flies (PDF-RNAi) are attracted to the odor port during Eb pulses of these intensities, and this attraction is inhibited by RNAi-mediated knockdown in OR22a-expressing OSNs of GABAA receptors individually or GABAA and GABAB receptors simultaneously. Mean ± SEM; E, F, Control flies (PDF-RNAi) avoid the odor port during 10 s at 1:5 (C) and at 1:1 (D) Eb pulses, and this avoidance is increased by RNAi-mediated knockdown in OR22a-expressing OSNs of GABAA receptors individually or GABAA and GABAB receptors simultaneously. Mean ± SEM; G, Net distance moved at the end of 10 s Eb pulses of the indicated gas-phase dilutions. For Eb dilutions of 1:25 or 1:5, knockdown in OR22a-expressing OSNs of GABAA receptors individually or simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors, increases avoidance of the odor port. For Eb dilution of 1:1, only simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors increases avoidance. Mean ± SEM, n = 650–800 total flies per genotype and concentration assayed in at least 10 independent experiments. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA followed with Bonferroni post hoc test (asterisks are color coded to indicate pairwise comparisons vs control), *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. H, Expression of either of two different GABAA-RNAi transgenes in OR22a-expressing OSNs increases avoidance. Mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Behavioral responses to quick 1 s Eb pulses are dependent on temporal odor dynamics in the behavioral chamber. A, Velocity of flies during and after 1 s Eb pulses is dependent on initial position within the olfactory arena at initiation of the odor pulse. Control flies expressing PDF-RNAi in OR22a-expressing neurons exhibit strong avoidance only to 1:1 Eb and only when initial position in the arena is ≤4 cm from the odor port. Mean ± SEM; n = 116–172 total flies per genotype and concentration assayed in at least 10 independent experiments. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, *p < 0.05. B, Behavioral responses of control flies (initial position to port <5 cm) to 1 s Eb pulses of gas-phase dilutions, as indicated in A. Mean ± SEM. C, D, Mean PID recordings (n = 5) in the behavioral chamber showing odor dynamics of 1 s odor pulses of 1:5 (C) and 1:1 (D) that vary dependent on the distance to the odor port. E, F, Tau represents the time that the odor stimulus takes to reach 36.8% of its peak value. For 1:5 (E) and 1:1 (F), tau drastically increases after a distance of 3–4 cm from the odor port, indicating that flies within 3 cm from the odor port experience a fast increase and decrease in odor intensity, while flies that are >3 cm away from the odor port experience more gradual changes in odor intensity. Mean ± SEM. n = 5.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Presynaptic OSN GABA receptors accelerate behavioral responses to odor pulse termination. A, B, Behavioral responses of flies within 3 cm from the odor port show avoidance during and after a 1 s Eb pulse of 1:5 (A) and 1:1 (B). Mean ± SEM; n = 100–200 total flies per genotype and concentration assayed over at least 10 independent experiments. C, Average velocity of flies within 3 cm from the odor port during and after a 1 s 1:5 Eb pulse. During and immediately after the odor pulse, the velocity away from the odor port is significantly increased by individual knockdown of GABAA receptors and simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors. The velocity between 2 and 4 s after the odor pulse is significantly increased by simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test (asterisks are color coded to indicate pairwise comparisons vs control), *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. D, Average velocity during 1:1 Eb odor pulses is unaffected by the knockdown of GABA receptors. However, simultaneous knockdown of GABAA and GABAB receptors significantly prolongs avoidance between 1 and 4 s after termination of the odor pulse. Statistical analysis: two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. E, F, Average velocity of flies that are >3 cm away from the odor port is unaffected by knockdown of GABA receptors for 1:5 (E) 1:1 (F) Eb odor pulses. Mean ± SEM. N = 200–300 flies.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    GABAA and GABAB receptors mediate presynaptic inhibition of OSNs to implement temporal contrast enhancement of sustained peripheral responses. A 1 s ethyl butyrate odor pulse (yellow boxes) of high concentration induces sustained peripheral neuronal activity in dendrites and cell bodies of OR22a-expressing OSNs. GABAergic LNs activate GABAA and GABAB receptors, leading to temporally sharpened odor responses in presynaptic terminals. Presynaptic sharpening contributes in mediating temporal contrast enhancement improving the detection of termination of a high-intensity odor pulse.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Statistical evaluation

    FigureInitial statistical testPost hoc test
    1CKruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, H = 21.05,p < 0.001Dunn; before pulse vs 1:25: Q = 0.73, p > 0.05; before pulse vs 1:5, 1:3, 1:1: Q > 2.5, p < 0.05
    1GUnpaired t test, t = −3.27, p = 0.006 for spontaneous firing rate and t = -2.21, p = 0.049 for peak firing rate
    3ETwo-way ANOVA, F = 6.15, p = 0.003Bonferroni vs peripheral voltage; at 1:125, 1:25, 1:10: vs presynaptic voltage and presynaptic Ca2+: t < 1.96, p > 0.09;at 1:5, 1:1: vs presynaptic Ca2+: t < 1.47, p > 0.29; vs presynaptic voltage: t > 3.11, p < 0.005
    3ITwo-way ANOVA, F = 7.63, p = 0.008Bonferroni; at 1:25: t = 0.55, p = 0.59; at 1:5: t = 2.09, p = 0.04; at 1:3: t = 2.24, p = 0.03; at 1:1: t = 0.84, p = 0.41
    3NTwo-way ANOVA, F = 268.5, p < 0.001Bonferroni; at 1:125: t = 0.07, p = 0.95; at 1:25: t = 0.49, p = 0.63; at 1:5: t = 14.85, p < 0.001; at 1:1: t = 17.37, p = 0<0.001
    4GTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F = 42.46, p < 0.001Bonferroni; for CGP: t = 0.55, p = 0.59; for PTX t = 1.28, p = 0.21; for CGP+PTX 1:5: t = 4.38, p < 0.001; for CGP+PTX 1:3:t = 8.59, p < 0.001; CGP+PTX 1:5 vs 1:3, t = 0.27, p = 1
    4HTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F = 20.61, p < 0.001Bonferroni; for CGP: t = 0.03, p = 0.98; for PTX t = 1.69, p = 0.1; for CGP+PTX 1:5: t = 3.87, p < 0.001; for CGP+PTX 1:3:t = 4.65, p < 0.001; CGP+PTX 1:5 vs 1:3, t = 3.42, p = 0.008
    4IPaired t test, t = -3.61, p = 0.011 for maximum response and t = 2.45, p = 0,049 for sharpness
    5ATwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F = 32.7, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; vs GABAB-RNAi: t > 2.81, p < 0.02; vs GABAA-RNAi: t = 1.72, p = 0.26 at 1:25, otherwise t > 3.05,p < 0.008; vs GABAB + GABAA-RNAi: t > 2.93, p < 0.012
    5BTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F = 9.91, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; vs GABAB-RNAi: t < 1.07, p > 0.86; vs GABAA-RNAi: t < 1.13, p > 0.78; vs GABAB + GABAA-RNAi:t = 0.15-0.18, p = 1 at 1:125 and 1:25; t = 2.49, p = 0.04 at 1:5; t = 3.15, p = 0.006 at 1:3; t = 5.12, p < 0.001 at 1:1
    5D, F, HTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F > 326.31, p < 0.001Bonferroni, control vs GABAA, values given for significant time intervals indicated in figure; at 1:25 t > 3.18, p < 0.004; at 1:5t > 3.09, p < 0.006; at 1:3, t > 2.64, p < 0.025
    5DTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F > 326.31, p < 0.001Bonferroni, control vs GABAB, values given for significant time intervals indicated in figure; at 1:25 t > 2.52, p < 0.035
    5F, H, JTwo-way ANOVA for repeated measurements, F > 326.31, p < 0.001Bonferroni, control vs GABAA + GABAB values given for significant time intervals indicated in figure; at 1:5 t > 2.56, p < 0.03; at 1:3t > 3.09, p < 0.006; at 1:1 t > 2.74, p < 0.018
    6GTwo-way ANOVA, F = 26.7, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; vs GABAA-RNAi, at 1:25 and 1:5 t = 3.56 and t = 3.59, p = 0.001; vs GABAA + GABAB-RNAi (+Dicer), at 1:25:t = 4.72, p < 0.001 (t = 5.11, p < 0.001); at 1:5: t = 2.53, p = 0.046 (t = 5.32, p < 0.001); at 1:1: t = 2.83, p < 0.001 (t = 5.35, p < 0.001)
    6HTwo-way ANOVA, F = 21.7, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; vs GABAA-RNAi (27E2), at 1:25, t = 3.39 andt = 5.74, p < 0.001; at 1:1 t = 4.51 and t = 5.31, p < 0.001
    7ATwo-way ANOVA, F = 7.17, p < 0.001Bonferroni; differences between distances only significant for 1:1: 0-4 cm vs 4-10 cm, t > 2.98, p < 0.03
    8CTwo-way ANOVA, F = 12.94, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; at 0-1 post-pulse time t = 3.49-3.52, p = 0.009-0.002; at 2-3 s post-pulse time, t = 3.15-3.18, p = 0.007; at 3-4 s post-pulse time, t = 3.02, p = 0.01
    8DTwo-way ANOVA, F = 6.63, p < 0.001Bonferroni vs control; at 1-2 s post-pulse time, t = 3.33-3.6, p = 0.003-0.001; at 2-3 s post pulse time, t = 2.52-2.9, p = 0.047-0.015; at 3-4 s post pulse time, t = 3.29, p = 0.004
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 4
July/August 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Presynaptic GABA Receptors Mediate Temporal Contrast Enhancement in Drosophila Olfactory Sensory Neurons and Modulate Odor-Driven Behavioral Kinetics
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Presynaptic GABA Receptors Mediate Temporal Contrast Enhancement in Drosophila Olfactory Sensory Neurons and Modulate Odor-Driven Behavioral Kinetics
Davide Raccuglia, Li Yan McCurdy, Mahmut Demir, Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya, Michael Kunst, Thierry Emonet, Michael N. Nitabach
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0080-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0080-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Presynaptic GABA Receptors Mediate Temporal Contrast Enhancement in Drosophila Olfactory Sensory Neurons and Modulate Odor-Driven Behavioral Kinetics
Davide Raccuglia, Li Yan McCurdy, Mahmut Demir, Srinivas Gorur-Shandilya, Michael Kunst, Thierry Emonet, Michael N. Nitabach
eNeuro 25 July 2016, 3 (4) ENEURO.0080-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0080-16.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in Palatability Processing across the Estrous Cycle Are Modulated by Hypothalamic Estradiol Signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.