Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Cognition and Behavior

Mesocortical Dopamine Phenotypes in Mice Lacking the Sonic Hedgehog Receptor Cdon

Michael Verwey, Alanna Grant, Nicholas Meti, Lauren Adye-White, Angelica Torres-Berrío, Veronique Rioux, Martin Lévesque, Frederic Charron and Cecilia Flores
eNeuro 29 June 2016, 3 (3) ENEURO.0009-16.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0009-16.2016
Michael Verwey
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
2Molecular Biology of Neural Development, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Verwey
Alanna Grant
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicholas Meti
2Molecular Biology of Neural Development, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauren Adye-White
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angelica Torres-Berrío
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Angelica Torres-Berrío
Veronique Rioux
6Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
7Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert-Giffard, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Lévesque
6Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
7Centre de Recherche Université Laval-Robert-Giffard, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Lévesque
Frederic Charron
2Molecular Biology of Neural Development, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
3Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Department of Biology, Division of Experimental Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
5Program in Neuroengineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Frederic Charron
Cecilia Flores
1Department of Psychiatry, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cecilia Flores
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Motivated behaviors and many psychopathologies typically involve changes in dopamine release from the projections of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and/or the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). The morphogen Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) specifies fates of midbrain dopamine neurons, but VTA-specific effects of Shh signaling are also being uncovered. In this study, we assessed the role of the Shh receptor Cdon in the development of VTA and SNc dopamine neurons. We find that Cdon is expressed in the proliferating progenitor zone of the embryonic ventral midbrain and that the number of proliferating cells in this region is increased in mouse Cdon−/− embryos. Consistent with a role of Shh in the regulation of neuronal proliferation in this region, we find that the number of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive neurons is increased in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice at birth and that this effect endures into adulthood. In contrast, the number of TH-positive neurons in the SNc is not altered in Cdon−/− mice at either age. Moreover, adult Cdon−/− mice have a greater number of medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) dopamine presynaptic sites, and increased baseline concentrations of dopamine and dopamine metabolites selectively in this region. Finally, consistent with increased dopamine function in the mPFC, we find that adult Cdon−/− mice fail to exhibit behavioral plasticity upon repeated amphetamine treatment. Based on these data, we suggest that Cdon plays an important role encoding the diversity of dopamine neurons in the midbrain, influencing both the development of the mesocortical dopamine pathway and behavioral outputs that involve this neural circuitry.

  • Cdon
  • dopamine
  • medial prefrontal cortex
  • sonic hedgehog
  • ventral tegmental area

Significance Statement

Sonic hedgehog signaling is involved in the specification and development of dopamine neurons in the ventral midbrain. Here we demonstrate that the Shh receptor Cdon plays a role in the development of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area. Moreover, this effect of Cdon is selective to the dopamine neurons that project to the medial prefrontal cortex. Adult mice that lack Cdon also fail to show amphetamine-induced behavioral plasticity. Our findings show that the Cdon receptor is important in encoding the diversity of dopamine neurons in the midbrain, influencing both the development of the mesocortical dopamine pathway as well as behavioral outputs that involve this neural circuitry.

Introduction

Midbrain dopamine neurons are involved in diverse behavioral and psychological processes, and alterations in their development can have implications that range from motor deficits to psychopathology (Björklund and Dunnett, 2007; Blesa and Przedborski, 2014; Volkow and Morales, 2015). Dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) share basic neurochemical similarities, but increasing evidence shows that they are heterogeneous and that their physiological properties vary in a target-dependent manner (Roeper, 2013). Likewise, developmental mechanisms that define the segregation of VTA and SNc dopamine neurons, and the unique cortical and striatal projections that they make, have also begun to emerge (Van den Heuvel and Pasterkamp, 2008; Anderegg et al., 2015; Bissonette and Roesch, 2016).

One example is the sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling pathway, which is involved in the specification of dopamine cell fate (Hynes et al., 1995; Wang et al., 1995; Wallén and Perlmann, 2003) and acts as a chemoattractant that promotes the rostral projections of these neurons (Hammond et al., 2009). In order to activate the Shh pathway, Shh binds to Patched1 (Ptch1), which leads to Smoothened disinhibition and the activation of Gli transcription factors. Shh signaling acts in two phases during the specification of dopaminergic neurons; during the first phase, notochord-derived Shh initiates the specification of the ventral midbrain, including the progenitors of dopamine neurons. During the second phase, Shh is expressed by dopamine neuron progenitors themselves, and the duration of Shh expression contributes to their fate decisions and their segregation between the VTA and SNc (Blaess et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2011, 2013). Therefore, the fate decisions of dopamine progenitors and the numbers of dopamine cells in the VTA and/or SNc are differentially influenced by Shh signaling, depending on how and at what developmental time the Shh signaling pathways is manipulated (Blaess et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2011, 2013; Kabanova et al., 2015). As a result, variations in Shh signaling, at selective developmental times, must influence behaviors in adulthood that depend on mesocorticolimbic and/or nigrostriatal dopamine pathways. Such variations in Shh signaling might therefore be involved in distinct psychopathologies.

Cell adhesion molecule-related/downregulated by oncogenes (Cdon) is a Ptch1 coreceptor that binds Shh (Okada et al., 2006) and modulates pathway activity (Okada et al., 2006; Allen et al., 2011; Yam and Charron, 2013). The role of Cdon in segregating dopamine neurons between the VTA and SNc, and its potential impacts on behavior, have never been explored. Here we show that Cdon is expressed in the embryonic ventral midbrain dopaminergic progenitors. Based on this finding, we hypothesized that Cdon could mediate some of the general, and possibly region-specific (i.e., VTA vs SNc) effects of Shh on the development of the dopamine system and, in turn, influence dopamine-mediated behaviors in adulthood. To this end, we compared wild-type (WT) and Cdon−/− embryos at embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5), and identified a potential role for Cdon in the regulation of proliferation in the midbrain dopaminergic progenitors. Consistent with a putative increase in the proliferation of dopamine progenitors in Cdon−/− mice, we observed an increase in the number of dopamine neurons in Cdon−/− mice immediately after birth and in adult life. Importantly, this increase was specifically observed in the VTA. Next, we examined dopamine concentrations in forebrain regions that receive dopamine projections from the VTA or the SNc and found increased levels of dopamine and dopamine metabolites in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), but not in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and dorsal striatum (DS), of adult Cdon−/− mice. Furthermore, we found that adult Cdon−/− mice have an increased number of mPFC dopamine presynaptic sites. To determine potential behavioral consequences of these neuroanatomical and neurochemical changes, we evaluated amphetamine-induced behavioral plasticity in adult Cdon−/− mice and found important deficits. These findings show that Cdon is important in the development of VTA dopamine neurons, particularly those projecting to the mPFC, and in turn influences adult behaviors that are dependent on these pathways.

Materials and Methods

Animal housing and breeding

All animal housing, experiments, and procedures were approved by the Animal Care Committee at the Douglas Mental Health University Institute, McGill University (Montreal, QC, Canada) and at the Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, and were all performed in accordance with the guidelines set out by the Canadian Council of Animal Care (http://www.ccac.ca). Cdon−/− mice (Okada et al., 2006) were generated by a gene trap vector that targeted the transmembrane domain of Cdon (Friedel et al., 2005) and were backcrossed with C57BL/6 mice for at least 10 generations. Experimental Cdon−/− mice were generated by crossing Cdon+/− breeders. Male and female offspring were pooled for embryonic and postnatal day 0 (P0) studies, as well as in the quantification of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-positive varicosities in the mPFC. All other experiments used only male mice.

Immunohistochemistry and stereological analyses

Tissue preparation and sectioning

Embryos and P0 pups were dissected, postfixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution (24 h, 4°C), cryoprotected in a sucrose solution (24 h, 15% sucrose, 4°C), then snap frozen in optimal cutting temperature medium (Tissue-Tek, Cedarlane) and stored at −80°C until slicing. Embryos (14 μm sections) and P0 (35 μm sections) pups were sliced on a cryostat (CM3050S, Leica), sections were collected on charged Superfrost Slides (Fisherbrand), and stored at −80°C until use. Adult male mice (postnatal day 75 ±15) were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (>75 mg/kg, i.p.), perfused transcardially with ∼50 ml of 0.9% saline followed by ∼50 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were dissected, postfixed overnight (4°C), and sliced on a Vibratome (35 μm sections; Leica). Serial coronal sections were stored free-floating in Watson’s cryoprotectant at −20°C until processing (Watson et al., 1986).

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescent staining was performed (Okada et al., 2006; Manitt et al., 2010, 2011; Mille et al., 2014) with anti-TH mouse (1:1000; MAB318, Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents), anti-TH rabbit (1:1000; MAB152, Millipore Bioscience Research Reagents), anti-Ki67 mouse (1:250; catalog #550609, BD Biosciences), anti-Cdon goat (1:500; AF2429, R&D Systems), and anti-β-galactosidase (β-Gal) rabbit (1:1000; catalog #0855976, MP Biologicals) antibodies. Antigen retrieval was used prior to all embryonic labeling, and Alexa Fluor 488-, Alexa Fluor 555-, or Alexa Fluor 643-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) were used for immunofluorescence. For P0 and adult stereology experiments that quantified TH-positive cells in the VTA and SN, a 3% hydrogen peroxide pretreatment was used to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, and a 3,3'-diaminobenzidine kit was used according to manufacturer instructions (PK-4000 ABC kit, SK-4100 DAB kit, Vector Laboratories). For stereological quantification of TH-positive varicosities in the mPFC, TH was visualized with an Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated secondary antibody.

Microscopy and analysis

Serial coronal sections of embryos and adult brains were examined with Leica DM4000 and DM6000 microscopes with an Orca ER CCD camera (Hamamatsu) using Volocity (PerkinElmer) or Stereo Investigator (MBF Bioscience) software. In order to avoid including mice with signs of holoprosencephaly (HPE), we inspected for HPE on the live/intact mouse or embryo and performed a careful and systematic morphological analysis under the microscope. Specifically, all embryos and mice were inspected for any signs of cebocephaly and incomplete forebrain clefting (Zhang et al., 2006). At P0, we observed a single instance of malformed olfactory bulbs, which is another sign of HPE and led to the exclusion of this mouse (Zhang et al., 2006). Finally, across all ages, we examined carefully for enlarged or malformed ventricles. We also verified that mice did not show tooth malformations, which is another symptom of Cdon-associated HPE (Cole and Krauss, 2003), and weighed mice regularly to identify possible difficulties eating. All the adult Cdon−/− mice included in the study had weights that were similar to those of the WT littermates.

Embryonic TH and Ki67 immunoreactivity was counted manually with ImageJ software, was averaged for at least two sections/level/embryo, and was analyzed by two-way ANOVAGenotype×Level. Stereology was performed to quantify the number of TH-positive cell bodies in the VTA and SNc, and the number of TH-positive varicosities in the mPFC (Manitt et al., 2013; Daubaras et al., 2014). Briefly, the number of TH-positive cells was counted in the VTA and SNc of Cdon−/− mice and WT littermate controls at P0 and P75 ± 15 with a stereological fractionator sampling design (West et al., 1991), and Stereoinvestigator software (MBF Bioscience). The VTA- and SNc-containing sections ranged from Plate 54 to Plate 57 of the mouse brain atlas (Franklin and Paxinos, 2007). The counting frame (75 × 75 μm) and grid size (150 × 150 μm) were chosen manually. Counting was performed using every other brain section. A guard zone of 5 μm at the top and bottom of the section was used, and the coefficient of error was <0.1 in all animals studied, and the experimenter was blind to experimental groups.

To obtain a measure of the presynaptic density of dopamine synapses in the pregenual mPFC, TH-positive varicosities were quantified in this structure. TH-positive varicosities are sites of putative synapses with a dendritic spine or shaft (Séguéla et al., 1988), and are where neurotransmitter synthesis, release, and reuptake generally occur (Benes et al., 1996). Consistent with previous neuroanatomical studies (Manitt et al., 2011; Reynolds et al., 2015), and because of the lateralization of the dopamine system, we only obtained counts from the right hemisphere. Using Stereo Investigator software (MBF Bioscience), we made stereological quantifications of the volume and the number of TH-positive varicosities in the cingulate (Cg), prelimbic (PL), and infralimbic (IL) subregions of the mPFC. These subregions were delineated according to plates 14–18 of the mouse brain atlas (Paxinos and Franklin, 2008), and the contours of the dense TH-positive innervation within each subregion were traced at 5× magnification using a Leica DM4000 microscope. An unbiased counting frame (25 × 25 µm) was superimposed on each contour, and counts were made at regular predetermined intervals (175 × 175 µm). All counting of varicosities was performed at 100× magnification on 6 of the 12 sections contained within the rostrocaudal borders of our region of interest (1:2 series). Guard zones (4 µm) and an optical dissector (10 µm) were used. We used the Cavalieri method in Stereo Investigator (MBF Bioscience) to assess the volume of TH-positive fiber innervation (µm3), and the optical fractionator probe was then used to count TH-positive varicosities. The Gundersen coefficient of error was <0.15 for all regions of interest in all sampled brains.

Analysis of dopamine and dopamine metabolite concentrations in rostral targets of midbrain dopamine neurons

Tissue preparation

As described previously (Grant et al., 2009, 2014), mice were decapitated, and their brains were rapidly dissected and snap frozen in 2-methylbutane (Fisher Scientific) on dry ice. Brains were then sliced on a cryostat and 0.5 mm punches (catalog #18035-50, Fine Science Tools) were taken bilaterally to dissect the pregenual mPFC (pooling Cg, PL, and IL subregions) and NAcc (including both shell and core), and a 1.0 mm punch was taken DS (dorsolateral portion); then all samples were frozen at −80°C until use.

High-performance liquid chromatography

Levels of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and homovanillic acid (HVA) in the DS, NAcc, and mPFC were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Grant et al., 2007). Briefly, brain punches from each area were homogenized in a 0.1 m phosphate buffer, centrifuged, the supernatant was then removed and filtered for HPLC testing, and the pellet was resuspended for quantification of the protein content (Bicinchoninic Acid Kit, catalog #P123225, Thermo Scientific). The HPLC assay for dopamine, DOPAC, and HVA was performed with an EZChrom Chromatography System (Scientific Software Inc). Dopamine and metabolites were detected and quantified with a Coulochem III detector, and concentrations were calculated from peak height comparisons with known amounts of injected pure standards (Sigma-Aldrich). Significance levels used to evaluate statistical differences were adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni’s sequentially rejective procedure (Holm, 1979).

Behavioral testing

Locomotor activity testing

As described previously (Grant et al., 2009; Yetnikoff et al., 2010), locomotor activity was measured by an infrared system that monitors total horizontal distance travelled within a defined period of time (AccuScan Instruments). On day 1, mice were habituated to the locomotor chambers for 15 min. On day 2, following a 15 min habituation period, mice were habituated to the injection procedure with an intraperitoneal injection of saline, and locomotor activity was recorded for 30 min. On day 3, after habituation, mice were given 2.5mg/kg (i.p.) d-amphetamine, and locomotor activity was monitored for another 90 min. Next, all mice were given 4 mg/kg d-amphetamine every other day, for a total of five additional injections, delivered on days 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13. Finally, on day 21, after 8 d of drug abstinence in their home cages, mice were tested again with 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine (see Fig. 7D, diagram illustrating this schedule). Differences between the locomotor activity induced by the first dose of amphetamine (day 3) and the last dose of amphetamine (day 21) represent a form of behavioral plasticity known as locomotor sensitization (Stewart and Badiani, 1993; Pierce and Kalivas, 1997).

Prepulse inhibition

As described previously (Grant et al., 2007), prepulse inhibition (PPI) was assessed using sound-attenuated startle chambers (SR-LAB, San Diego Instruments) containing a clear restraining tube that housed the animal throughout the testing session and background white noise (70 dB) was delivered continuously. Prior to each session, all chambers were calibrated to ensure consistent sensitivity and stable sound levels between testing boxes. A 120 dB pulse induced a startle response in mice, which was recorded by computer, and an average of 65 readings was taken at 1 ms intervals after the startle pulse. Each prepulse was delivered 100 ms before the acoustic startle, and lasted 20 ms. Within each session, there was a total of 54 trials in a pseudorandom order, which included 12 startle trials with no prepulse, 6 trials with prepulses at each volume (3, 5, 7, 10, 15, and 20 dB, above the 70 dB background noise), and 6 null trials where no acoustic startle was presented. The degree of PPI was then calculated as a percentage for each prepulse intensity: PPI% = 1 − (mean prepulse − mean null)/(mean startle − mean null)*100.

Statistical analyses

All Student’s t tests, analyses of variance, and Bonferroni’s post hoc tests were performed using Prism 5 (GraphPad Software). For each figure and statistical test, F and t values are reported in Table 1. Specifically, in Figure 2, C and E, Student’s t test was used, and in Figure 2, D and F, two-way ANOVAGenotype×Level was used. In Figure 3, stereological means were compared within each brain area by Student’s t test. In Figure 4, planned comparisons were made using the Holm–Bonferroni’s sequentially rejective procedure (Holm, 1979). In Figure 5, a two-way ANOVAGenotype×Region was used. In Figure 6A–C, two-way ANOVAGenotype×Time was used to compare groups over the duration of the test, and in Figure 6, E and F, two-way ANOVAGenotype×Time was used with Bonferroni’s post hoc comparisons. In Figure 7, a two-way ANOVAGenotype×ppvolume was used. All graphs illustrate the mean ± standard error.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Statistical tests and values

Results

Cdon is expressed in proliferating midbrain dopamine progenitor cells at E12.5

We assessed whether Cdon is expressed in the embryonic ventral midbrain. This was done using two complementary approaches in the ventral midbrain of E12.5 embryos (Fig. 1A). First, we used mice in which a gene encoding β-Gal was inserted in the Cdon gene by homologous recombination (Okada et al., 2006) and assessed β-Gal expression by immunofluorescence in Cdon+/− embryos. Periventricular and ventral β-Gal labeling was observed in a zone where progenitors proliferate and differentiate into dopamine neurons, as shown in Figure 1B (top). As a negative control, no β-Gal labeling was observed in Cdon+/+ embryos under the same conditions (Fig. 1B, bottom). As a second approach, immunolabeling against the Cdon protein showed a very similar Cdon localization in the ventral midbrain of WT embryos (Fig. 1C, top and middle), confirming the results obtained using the β-Gal reporter. We next analyzed Cdon expression (using the β-Gal reporter) in the context of proliferating (Ki67), immature [nuclear receptor related 1 (Nurr1)], and mature dopamine neurons expressing TH in the ventral midbrain. We found that at E12.5, Cdon (β-Gal) expression was dorsal to, and did not overlap with, the TH-positive zone (Fig. 1D, top). Based on labeling in adjacent sections, there was a small overlap with immature dopamine neurons expressing Nurr1 but not TH (Fig. 1D, middle). However, Cdon (β-Gal) expression was strongest in the proliferative, Ki67-positive, progenitor zone (Fig. 1D, bottom). Therefore, at E12.5, Cdon is mostly expressed in the proliferating midbrain dopamine progenitors.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cdon is expressed in proliferating progenitor cells of the ventral midbrain at E12.5. A, Schematic illustration of a brain from E12.5 embryo showing the anteroposterior level used in the coronal sections shown in B–D. B, Cdon+/− embryos exhibit staining for β-Gal (Cdon) expression in the ventral midbrain (middle), which is not seen in WT negative control (bottom panel). C, Cdon immunolabeling appears throughout the dopamine progenitor zone in the ventral midbrain of a WT embryo (top and middle), while a control section stained without primary antibody (bottom) has no such labeling. D, β-Gal (Cdon) expression relative to TH (a marker of mature dopamine neurons), Nurr1 (a marker of immature postmitotic dopamine neurons), and Ki67 (a marker of proliferation) indicate that Cdon overlaps mainly with the proliferative Ki67-positive zone.

Increased number of proliferating cells in the ventral midbrain of Cdon−/− embryos at E12.5

In order to assess the role of Cdon in the development of dopamine neurons, Cdon−/− and WT littermates were stained for Ki67 and TH at E12.5. Representative images of immunofluorescence are shown in Figure 2A, which are coronal sections from the ventral midbrain (Fig. 2B). Cdon−/− embryos exhibited a significant increase in the number of Ki67-positive cells on the ventricular border compared with WT littermates (Fig. 2C; unpaired t test, p = 0.0069; Table 1, a). Moreover, this effect was observed across the anterior–posterior axis (Fig. 2D; ANOVAGenotype, p = 0.0003; Table 1, b). This increase in Ki67 indicates that there is an increased level of proliferation of neural progenitors in the ventral midbrain of Cdon−/− embryos. In contrast, at the same embryonic stage, the number of TH-positive neurons was similar between genotypes (Fig. 2E; unpaired t test; Table 1, c). This was also true when individual levels of the anterior–posterior axis were investigated (Fig. 2F, ANOVAGenotype×Level; Table 1, d). These results indicate that inactivation of Cdon causes an increase in the number of proliferating progenitors, but that E12.5 could be still be too early to observe a change in the number of cells expressing TH.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

The number of proliferating cells in the ventral midbrain of Cdon−/− embryos is increased at E12.5. A, Representative merged images of immunofluorescence for Ki67 (green), TH (red), and DAPI (blue) in coronal slices of the ventral midbrain of embryos at E12.5. B, Schematic illustrating the coronal plane of analysis. C, The total number of Ki67 immunoreactive cells was significantly increased in Cdon−/− embryos relative to WT controls (Student’s t test, p = 0.0069; Table 1, a), and, D, this effect was seen across the anterior to mid-posterior extent of the ventral midbrain (ANOVAGenotype×Level, main effect of genotype, p = 0.0003; Table 1, b). E, The total number of TH immunoreactive cells was similar between Cdon−/− embryos relative to WT controls (Student’s t test, p = 0.498; Table 1, c), and no genotype- or level-based effect was observed at, F, anterior, mid, or posterior levels of the ventral midbrain (ANOVAGenotype×Level; Table 1, d). n = 6-8 embryos/group.

Postnatal increase in the number of TH-positive neurons in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice

We next assessed whether this increase in progenitor proliferation leads to an increase in the numbers of dopamine neurons later in brain development and in adulthood. Stereological counts of TH-positive neurons in the VTA and SNc at P0 revealed a significant increase in the number of TH-positive cells in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice compared with WT littermates (Fig. 3A, left graph; Student’s t test, p = 0.01; Table 1, e). In contrast, the number of TH-positive cells in the SNc is not significantly changed between genotypes (Fig. 3A, right graph; Student’s t test; Table 1, e). Interestingly, the same pattern is observed in adult mice, where there are more TH-positive neurons in the VTA of adult Cdon−/− mice compared with WT littermates (Fig. 3B, left graph; Student’s t test, p = 0.006; Table 1, f; Fig. 3C), but there are no genotype differences in TH-positive cell counts in the SNc (Fig. 3B, right graph; Table 1, f). These data show that there is an early, enduring increase in the number of TH-positive neurons in Cdon−/− mice compared with WT littermates. Interestingly, this increase is selective to the medial portion (i.e., VTA region) of the midbrain dopamine somatodendritic region.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

A greater number of TH-positive neurons in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice at birth and in adulthood. A, B, Total number of TH-positive neurons in the VTA (left, in red) and SN (right, in blue) in P0 (A) and adult mice (B) as measured by stereology. A greater number of TH-positive neurons were observed in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice compared to WT controls at birth (Student’s t test, p < 0.05; Table 1, e) and in adulthood (Student’s t test, p < 0.01; Table 1, f). C, Mouse brain atlas illustrations showing the VTA and SN sections that were included in this analysis, and representative TH immunoreactivity in coronal sections of adult mice. n = 4-5 mice/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Selective increase in dopamine levels in the PFC of adult Cdon−/− mice

To examine whether the increase in the number of TH-positive neurons in the VTA is associated with differential content of dopamine and the dopamine metabolites DOPAC and HVA in forebrain terminal regions, we conducted HPLC on tissue samples of VTA and SNc targets: mPFC, NAcc, and DS (Fig. 4A, illustrations). As shown in Figure 4B (top), in the mPFC the levels of dopamine and DOPAC in Cdon−/− mice are significantly elevated compared to WT littermates (Student’s t test with Holm–Bonferroni correction: dopamine, p = 0.03; DOPAC, p = 0.019; Table 1, g). In contrast, there were no differences between genotypes in the concentrations of dopamine, DOPAC, and HVA in the NAcc (Fig. 4B, middle; Table 1, g) or DS (Fig. 4B, bottom; Table 1, g). These findings suggest that the increase in the number of TH-positive cells in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice is specific to VTA dopamine neurons that project to the mPFC.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Greater dopamine and DOPAC concentrations in the mPFC, but not the NAcc or DS, of adult Cdon−/− mice. A, Brain samples were taken from each target region illustrated. B, HPLC revealed a selective increase in the dopamine and DOPAC concentrations of the mPFC of Cdon−/− mice, an effect that was not seen in the NAcc or DS (Table 1, g). n = 7-10 animals/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

Increased number of TH-positive varicosities in the mPFC of Cdon−/− mice

We then performed stereological quantifications of dopamine varicosities in the Cg, PL, and IL subregions (Fig. 5A) of the pregenual mPFC. We found a significant increase in the total number of dopamine varicosities (i.e. dopamine presynaptic sites) in the Cg, PL, and IL subregions of the mPFC of Cdon−/− mice compared with controls (Fig. 5B; ANOVAGenotype, p = 0.0079; Table 1, h). To determine whether this increase in the total number of dopamine presynaptic sites results from an enhanced expanse of the dopamine innervation to the mPFC, we quantified the volume of the dopamine input to each subregion using the Cavalieri method (Manitt et al., 2011; Reynolds et al., 2015). There were no differences in dopamine input volume between genotypes in any of the subregions examined, indicating that dopamine axons in Cdon−/− mice are not extending to other mPFC layers (Fig. 5C, ANOVAGenotype; Table 1, i). This led to a significant increase in the density of dopamine varicosities in all three subregions (Fig. 5D; ANOVAGenotype, p = 0.0073; Table 1, j), which could be seen at high magnification (Fig. 5E).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Increased number of dopamine varicosities in the mPFC of Cdon−/− mice. A, Stereological quantifications of the number of dopamine varicosities in the Cg, the PL, and the IL pregenual mPFC. B, The total number of dopamine varicosities was greater in the Cdon−/− mice compared with WT controls (ANOVAGenotype, p = 0.0079; Table 1, h). C, There were no differences in the volume that dopamine varicosities occupied in the mPFC between Cdon−/− and WT mice (Table 1, i). D, Likewise, an increase in the density of dopamine varicosities was observed in all three subregions (ANOVAGenotype, p = 0.0073; Table 1, j). E, Representative photomicrographs at high magnification illustrating differences in the total number/density of dopamine varicosities in the PL mPFC comparing Cdon−/− and WT mice. n = 3 mice/group.

Locomotor activity of Cdon−/− mice reveals an attenuation of behavioral plasticity in adulthood

To examine the possible consequences of the neuroanatomical changes that we observed in the VTA and mPFC of Cdon−/− mice, we evaluated the locomotor responses of adult Cdon−/− and WT mice. Both genotypes exhibited similar levels of locomotor activity when placed in the novel locomotor testing environment (Fig. 6A; Table 1, k) and in response to a saline injection (Fig. 6B; Table 1, l). Cdon−/− and WT mice also responded identically to the first dose of d-amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg; Fig. 6C; Table 1, m). Thus, Cdon−/− and WT littermates respond with similar amounts of locomotor activity in response to novelty and to single exposure to a stressor (e.g., saline injection) or a stimulant drug of abuse (e.g., amphetamine).

The amount of locomotor activity typically increases with repeated drug experience, a phenomenon known as sensitization. In order to test locomotor sensitization, mice were given 5 doses of 4 mg/kg d-amphetamine every other day (over the next 2.5 weeks) and then were left undisturbed in their home cage for 8 d (Fig. 6D, schedule). Mice were then tested at the same 2.5 mg/kg dose that was used in the first trial, ∼3 weeks previously. WT mice exhibited robust locomotor sensitization, and when pre- and postsensitization levels were compared, the amount of locomotor activity nearly doubled (Fig. 6E; within-subjects Bonferroni’s post hoc test on WT, p = 0.0018; Table 1, n). In contrast, no change in the amount of locomotor activity was observed in the Cdon−/− mice when pre- and postsensitization levels were compared (Fig. 6E). Of note, drug-induced stereotypy (repetitive behavior) was also increased in WT mice over time (Fig. 6F, within-subjects Bonferroni’s post hoc test on WT, p = 0.027; Table 1, o), but did not change significantly in Cdon−/− mice (Fig. 6F). These data demonstrate that while baseline locomotor responses to stress and to an initial dose of amphetamine were indistinguishable between Cdon−/− and WT mice, amphetamine-induced behavioral plasticity is attenuated in Cdon−/− mice.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Locomotor activity testing of Cdon−/− mice reveals attenuation of behavioral plasticity in adulthood. A–C, First exposure/habituation to the locomotor testing environment (A), habituation to handling and saline injection (injection denoted by “S” vertical line; B), and the first injection of amphetamine (injection denoted by “A” vertical line, 2.5 mg/kg, i.p.; C) all produce indistinguishable levels of locomotor activity between Cdon−/− and WT controls (Table 1, k, l, and m, respectively). D, E, In contrast, a sensitizing schedule of amphetamine injections (D) induced robust locomotor sensitization in WT controls (E), while locomotor sensitization in Cdon−/− mice was greatly attenuated (ANOVAGenotype×Time, p = 0.043; Table 1, n). F, Stereotypy counts were increased in WT controls, but did not change significantly in Cdon−/− mice. n = 6-10 animals/group.

Attenuated sensorimotor gating function in adult Cdon−/− mice

To further examine behavioral consequences of the neuroanatomical changes that we observed in Cdon−/− mice, we next tested sensorimotor gating function in adult mice, which can be modulated by alterations in mesocortical dopamine function (Swerdlow et al., 1990; Tenn et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007). Rodents startle in response to loud noises, and this reflex is typically reduced if an acoustic prepulse is given. The reduction in the startle magnitude is called PPI, and louder prepulses typically produce greater PPI. As expected in WT mice, increasing the prepulse volume increases PPI (Fig. 7; main effect of ppvolume, p = 0.0001; Table 1, p). However, PPI was significantly reduced in Cdon−/− mice compared with WT littermates (Fig. 7; main effect of genotype, p = 0.0006; Table 1, p).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Sensorimotor gating function is attenuated in adult Cdon−/− mice. PPI is measured relative to the baseline startle for each mouse and is shown according to the volume of each prepulse (pp3, pp5, pp7, pp10, pp15, pp20), which is the number of decibels above environmental white noise (70 dB). The PPI percentage was calculated for each prepulse volume (mean prepulse) as a percentage of the unsignaled startle intensity (mean startle) for each individual mouse, and the baseline movement in the absence of acoustic pulses (mean null) was subtracted from all values: PPI% = 1 − (mean prepulse − mean null)/(mean startle − mean null)*100. When the normalized PPI for each individual were compared by two-way ANOVAppvolume × Genotype significant effects of volume (ANOVAppvolume, p < 0.0001; Table 1, p) and genotype (ANOVAGenotype, p < 0.001; Table 1, p) were observed on PPI.

Discussion

In this study, we assessed the role of the Shh receptor Cdon in the development of VTA and SNc dopamine neurons. We found that Cdon is expressed in the proliferating progenitor zone of the embryonic ventral midbrain, and that the number of proliferating cells in this region is increased in Cdon−/− embryos. These findings indicate that Cdon is involved in the regulation of neuronal proliferation in progenitors of the ventral midbrain. Consistent with this idea, we found that the number of TH-positive neurons is increased in the VTA of Cdon−/− mice at birth and that this effect endures into adulthood. In contrast, the number of TH-positive neurons in the SNc is not significantly altered in Cdon−/− mice at either age. In accordance with an increase in the number of mesocortical VTA dopaminergic neurons, there is a greater number of dopamine presynaptic sites in the mPFC, and corresponding increases in baseline concentrations of dopamine and dopamine metabolites selectively in this region in adult Cdon−/− mice. These data indicate that Cdon is selectively involved in the development of mesocortical dopamine neurons. Finally, we found that adult Cdon−/− mice fail to exhibit dopamine-dependent behavioral plasticity in response to repeated injections of amphetamine. Based on these data, we suggest that Cdon plays an important role in the encoding of diversity within the population of dopamine neurons of the midbrain, influencing both the development of the mesocortical dopamine pathway as well as behavioral outputs that involve this neural circuitry.

Cdon and dopaminergic neuron development

In the first phase of dopamine neuron specification, notochord-derived Shh initiates the specification of the ventral midbrain. Inactivation of Shh signaling at this phase leads to almost complete absence of dopaminergic neurons (Blaess et al., 2006). During the second phase, Shh is expressed by dopaminergic neuron progenitors and the duration of its expression contributes to their fate decisions into dopamine neurons and their segregation between VTA and SNc (Blaess et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2011). Accordingly, inactivation of Shh signaling only after Shh is expressed within the dopamine progenitors (i.e., inactivation only during the second phase) leads to a VTA-specific increase in the number of dopamine cells, leaving the number of SNc dopamine cells unchanged (Hayes et al., 2013). Interestingly, this phenotype is very similar to what we observed in Cdon−/− mice, where we observed an increase in VTA dopaminergic neurons, but no change in SNc neurons. These results support the idea that the main role of Cdon is in the second phase of dopaminergic neuron induction. In agreement with this, we did not observe a difference in the number of TH-expressing neurons at E12.5, further indicating that Cdon plays a minor role, if any, in the first phase of dopaminergic neuron induction.

A previous study tested the importance of continued Shh expression in dopamine neurons in adult mice. Gonzalez-Reyes et al. (2012) used a Cre-Lox recombination strategy in order to selectively remove Shh from neurons that express the dopamine transporter. The dopamine transporter is a marker of mature dopamine neurons, and when Shh was removed from these neurons, premature degeneration was observed in the dopamine neurons of the SNc (Gonzalez-Reyes et al., 2012). Therefore, continued Shh expression is critical for the long-term maintenance of dopamine neurons in the SNc and nigrostriatal circuitry. Because we do not observe similar degeneration in the Cdon−/− mice, we propose that this Shh effect on adult SNc circuitry may not require Cdon.

A previous report described a reduction in the number of TH-positive cells in E13.5 Cdon−/− embryos (Kwon et al., 2014). One possible reason for this discrepancy with our data is the presence or absence of HPE in the Cdon−/− embryos analyzed. HPE is a condition that results in inadequate formation of the neural midline and ventricle malformation. Many studies have reported Cdon−/− mouse lines with as many as ∼80% of mutants showing HPE at birth, with virtually none surviving into adulthood (Cole and Krauss, 2003; Zhang et al., 2006, 2011; Bae et al., 2011; Hong and Krauss, 2013). In contrast, our Cdon mouse line exhibits a lower rate of HPE (∼10-20%), and only mice that did not show any obvious signs of HPE and that remained healthy into adulthood were included in our study. This variability between studies is in part attributed to the fact that the expression of HPE in Cdon−/− mice depends strongly on the genetic background and genetic modifiers of this receptor (Cole and Krauss, 2003; Zhang et al., 2006; Bae et al., 2011). Importantly, HPE has indeed been associated with decreased proliferation in primary neuronal cultures in Cdon mutant mice (Zhang et al., 2006). Therefore, when present, HPE could potentially be acting in opposition to the enhanced proliferation phenotype that we observed in our study.

The increased numbers of Ki67-positive cells that we observe at E12.5 coincides with the second stage of Shh signaling. At this stage in development, it would appear that Cdon modulates the proliferation rate of dopamine neuron progenitors. Indeed, it has been shown that once dopamine neuron progenitors begin to express Shh, the duration and timing of Shh expression contributes to fate decisions made by these cells (Blaess et al., 2011; Hayes et al., 2011). Therefore, mechanisms that alter the intensity or the duration of Shh signaling and expression are likely modified by removing the Shh receptor Cdon. This could result in increased numbers of proliferating dopamine neurons that go on to contribute mainly to the mesocortical pool.

An increasing number of reports show that dopamine neurons in the VTA are a heterogeneous population, and that the neuroanatomical, electrophysiological, and developmental properties of these neurons are dictated by the targets they innervate. It is therefore possible that in the midbrain, only a subset of the medial portion of the ventral midbrain dopamine neuron progenitors coexpress Cdon and Shh, namely those dopamine progenitors that are fated to innervate the mPFC. Increased numbers of mesocortical dopamine neurons would presumably lead to increased dopamine input to and dopamine concentrations in the mPFC. Because the dopamine innervation to the mPFC is a protracted event, which extends into early adulthood, we would also predict that these effects will only manifest fully in adulthood. The fact that Cdon−/− mice exhibit a greater number of presynaptic dopamine sites in the mPFC without showing increases in the expanse that dopamine fibers occupy in this regions indicates that Cdon plays a role in the proliferation of mesocortical dopamine neurons, but not in their guidance toward forebrain targets.

Cdon, mesocortical dopamine, and behavioral responses to drugs of abuse

Locomotor responses to amphetamine depend mainly on drug-induced dopamine release in the NAcc (Vezina et al., 1991; Vezina, 1993), which is influenced by dopamine function in the mPFC (Bimpisidis et al., 2013). For example, mice that are haploinsufficient for the Netrin-1 receptor Dcc exhibit increased baseline concentrations of dopamine and dopamine metabolites in mPFC, which in turn causes blunted amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the NAcc (Flores et al., 2005; Pokinko et al., 2015). Interestingly, adult Dcc haploinsufficient mice also fail to show sensitization to the locomotor effects of amphetamine upon repeated exposure (Flores et al., 2005; Grant et al., 2007; Yetnikoff et al., 2010). Thus, it is likely that the behavioral changes observed in adult Cdon−/− mice could result from blunted responsiveness of NAcc-projecting dopamine neurons, which are associated with increased mPFC dopamine function (Bimpisidis et al., 2013).

The selective effects of Cdon on the mesocortical dopamine projections are particularly interesting in light of another recent study that also highlighted the sensitivity of this circuit to changes in Shh signaling (Kabanova et al., 2015). Gli2 is a transcription factor mediating many of the intracellular effects of Shh signaling in the brain (Vokes et al., 2007), and it is involved in the specification of dopamine neurons (Matise et al., 1998). Recently, Gli2 was conditionally removed from the cells of the ventral midbrain through En1-Cre-induced recombination (Kabanova et al., 2015). In these mice, dopamine levels were decreased in the mPFC, but not in the NAcc (Kabanova et al., 2015). Tracing experiments also demonstrated that the density of dopamine projection into the mPFC was reduced, whereas the density of dopamine fibers in the NAcc was not altered (Kabanova et al., 2015). While novel object learning was unimpaired in these mice, Kabanova et al. (2015) report increases in the amount of perseverative behavior during a five-choice serial reaction time task. This deficit in attention processing may be linked to the alterations in mPFC dopamine circuitry that we observe in adult Cdon−/− mice (Moghaddam, 2002; Grace et al., 2007).

The relationship between increased dopamine concentrations in the mPFC and impaired PPI in Cdon−/− mice is surprising, and at this point we cannot provide a conclusive mechanistic explanation of this finding. Deficits in baseline prepulse inhibition have been shown to result from reduced mesocortical dopamine function (Bubser and Koch, 1994; Swerdlow and Geyer, 1998; Kohl et al., 2013). Furthermore, because mesocortical dopamine function and responsiveness of mesolimbic dopamine neurons to stressors and drugs of abuse are inversely related (Jackson and Moghaddam, 2001; Ventura et al., 2004; Scornaiencki et al., 2009; Pokinko et al., 2015), it has been suggested that the role of mPFC dopamine on PPI is mediated by changes in ventral striatal dopamine function (Bubser and Koch, 1994; Koch and Bubser, 1994; Ellenbroek et al., 1996; Grant et al., 2007; Flores, 2011). However, there are no differences in nucleus accumbens dopamine concentrations between Cdon−/− and WT mice. It is possible that impaired sensorimotor gating function in Cdon−/− mice results from alterations in mPFC and/or nucleus accumbens dopamine release that could only be captured via in vivo microdialysis or voltammetry. Moreover, it is also possible that either insufficient or excessive extracellular dopamine concentration in the mPFC lead to deficits in PPI as has been shown for the effects of mPFC dopamine function on cognitive processing (Floresco, 2013). Future studies will be aimed at addressing this issue by directly using neurochemical and lesion approaches used in previous studies (Jackson and Moghaddam, 2001; Ventura et al., 2004; Grant et al., 2007; Scornaiencki et al., 2009; Pokinko et al., 2015).

In conclusion, it is increasingly becoming clear that the diversity of midbrain dopamine neurons results from developmental processes that determine the heterogeneity of these cells, potentially long before this diversity can be accurately described (Anderegg et al., 2015). This diversity can be captured by comparing anatomical and functional properties of VTA and SNc dopamine neurons, but also by comparing electrophysiological properties of dopamine projections to cortical versus limbic targets (Lammel et al., 2008; Roeper, 2013), both of which are impossible to capture at early embryonic stages. In the current study, we demonstrate that the Shh receptor Cdon plays a specific role in the developmental organization and function of the mesocortical dopamine pathway. These changes also influence adult behavioral responses to drugs of abuse and sensorimotor gating. Our data therefore provide novel insights toward the diverse consequences of alterations in Shh signaling and describe changes in the VTA that have potential implications for psychopathologies such as schizophrenia (Meyer et al., 2008; Boyd et al., 2015) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Heussler et al., 2002).

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank Jimmy Peng, Steves Morin, Dominique Nouel, Jessica Barthe, and Lukas Tamayo-Orrego for help and advice.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to F.C. and C.F., the Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS) to F.C. and C.F., the Canada Foundation for Innovation to F.C. and C.F., and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to M.L. and C.F. M.V. is the recipient of FRQS and NSERC postdoctoral research fellowships. M.L. and C.F. are FRQS Research Scholars. F.C. holds the Canada Research Chair in Developmental Neurobiology.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Allen BL, Song JY, Izzi L, Althaus IW, Kang JS, Charron F, Krauss RS, McMahon AP (2011) Overlapping roles and collective requirement for the coreceptors GAS1, CDO, and BOC in SHH pathway function. Dev Cell 20:775–787. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2011.04.018 pmid:21664576
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Anderegg A, Poulin JF, Awatramani R (2015) Molecular heterogeneity of midbrain dopaminergic neurons—moving toward single cell resolution. FEBS Lett 589:3714–3726.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Bae GU, Domené S, Roessler E, Schachter K, Kang JS, Muenke M, Krauss RS (2011) Mutations in CDON, encoding a hedgehog receptor, result in holoprosencephaly and defective interactions with other hedgehog receptors. Am J Hum Genet 89:231–240. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.07.001 pmid:21802063
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Benes FM, Vincent SL, Molloy R, Khan Y (1996) Increased interaction of dopamine-immunoreactive varicosities with GABA neurons of rat medial prefrontal cortex occurs during the postweanling period. Synapse 23:237–245. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199608)23:4&amp;lt;237::AID-SYN1&amp;gt;3.0.CO;2-8 pmid:8855508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bimpisidis Z, De Luca MA, Pisanu A, Di Chiara G (2013) Lesion of medial prefrontal dopamine terminals abolishes habituation of accumbens shell dopamine responsiveness to taste stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 37:613–622. doi:10.1111/ejn.12068 pmid:23216547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bissonette GB, Roesch MR (2016) Development and function of the midbrain dopamine system: what we know and what we need to. Genes Brain Behav 15:62–73. doi:10.1111/gbb.12257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Björklund A, Dunnett SB (2007) Dopamine neuron systems in the brain: an update. Trends Neurosci 30:194–202. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.006 pmid:17408759
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Blaess S, Corrales JD, Joyner AL (2006) Sonic hedgehog regulates Gli activator and repressor functions with spatial and temporal precision in the mid/hindbrain region. Development 133:1799–1809. doi:10.1242/dev.02339 pmid:16571630
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Blaess S, Bodea GO, Kabanova A, Chanet S, Mugniery E, Derouiche A, Stephen D, Joyner AL (2011) Temporal-spatial changes in Sonic Hedgehog expression and signaling reveal different potentials of ventral mesencephalic progenitors to populate distinct ventral midbrain nuclei. Neural Dev 6:29 doi:10.1186/1749-8104-6-29 pmid:21689430
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Blesa J, Przedborski S (2014) Parkinson's disease: animal models and dopaminergic cell vulnerability. Front Neuroanat 8:155 doi:10.3389/fnana.2014.00155 pmid:25565980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Boyd PJ, Cunliffe VT, Roy S, Wood JD (2015) Sonic hedgehog functions upstream of disrupted-in-schizophrenia 1 (disc1): implications for mental illness. Biol Open 4:1336–1343. doi:10.1242/bio.012005 pmid:26405049
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Bubser M, Koch M (1994) Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response of rats is reduced by 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 113:487–492. pmid:7862864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Cole F, Krauss RS (2003) Microform holoprosencephaly in mice that lack the Ig superfamily member Cdon. Curr Biol 13:411–415. pmid:12620190
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Daubaras M, Dal Bo G, Flores C (2014) Target-dependent expression of the netrin-1 receptor, UNC5C, in projection neurons of the ventral tegmental area. Neuroscience 260:36–46. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.12.007 pmid:24333968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Ellenbroek BA, Budde S, Cools AR (1996) Prepulse inhibition and latent inhibition: the role of dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience 75:535–542. pmid:8931016
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Flores C (2011) Role of netrin-1 in the organization and function of the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. J Psychiatry Neurosci 36:296–310. doi:10.1503/jpn.100171 pmid:21481303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Flores C, Manitt C, Rodaros D, Thompson KM, Rajabi H, Luk KC, Tritsch NX, Sadikot AF, Stewart J, Kennedy TE (2005) Netrin receptor deficient mice exhibit functional reorganization of dopaminergic systems and do not sensitize to amphetamine. Mol Psychiatry 10:606–612. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001607 pmid:15534618
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Floresco SB (2013) Prefrontal dopamine and behavioral flexibility: shifting from an “inverted-U” toward a family of functions. Front Neurosci 7:62. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00062 pmid:23626521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Franklin KBJ, Paxinos G (2007) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 3. New York: Academic.
  20. ↵
    Friedel RH, Plump A, Lu X, Spilker K, Jolicoeur C, Wong K, Venkatesh TR, Yaron A, Hynes M, Chen B, Okada A, McConnell SK, Rayburn H, Tessier-Lavigne M (2005) Gene targeting using a promoterless gene trap vector (“targeted trapping”) is an efficient method to mutate a large fraction of genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:13188–13193. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505474102 pmid:16129827
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Gonzalez-Reyes LE, Verbitsky M, Blesa J, Jackson-Lewis V, Paredes D, Tillack K, Phani S, Kramer ER, Przedborski S, Kottmann AH (2012) Sonic hedgehog maintains cellular and neurochemical homeostasis in the adult nigrostriatal circuit. Neuron 75:306–319. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.018 pmid:22841315
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Grace AA, Floresco SB, Goto Y, Lodge DJ (2007) Regulation of firing of dopaminergic neurons and control of goal-directed behaviors. Trends Neurosci 30:220–227. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.003 pmid:17400299
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Grant A, Hoops D, Labelle-Dumais C, Prévost M, Rajabi H, Kolb B, Stewart J, Arvanitogiannis A, Flores C (2007) Netrin-1 receptor-deficient mice show enhanced mesocortical dopamine transmission and blunted behavioural responses to amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 26:3215–3228. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05888.x pmid:18005074
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Grant A, Speed Z, Labelle-Dumais C, Flores C (2009) Post-pubertal emergence of a dopamine phenotype in netrin-1 receptor-deficient mice. Eur J Neurosci 30:1318–1328. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06919.x pmid:19788579
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Grant A, Manitt C, Flores C (2014) Haloperidol treatment downregulates DCC expression in the ventral tegmental area. Neurosci Lett 575:58–62. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.05.030 pmid:24861518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Hammond R, Blaess S, Abeliovich A (2009) Sonic hedgehog is a chemoattractant for midbrain dopaminergic axons. PLoS One 4:e7007. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007007 pmid:19774071
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Hayes L, Zhang Z, Albert P, Zervas M, Ahn S (2011) Timing of Sonic hedgehog and Gli1 expression segregates midbrain dopamine neurons. J Comp Neur 519:3001–3018. doi:10.1002/cne.22711 pmid:21713771
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Hayes L, Ralls S, Wang H, Ahn S (2013) Duration of Shh signaling contributes to mDA neuron diversity. Dev Biol 374:115–126. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.11.016 pmid:23201023
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Heussler HS, Suri M, Young ID, Muenke M (2002) Extreme variability of expression of a Sonic Hedgehog mutation: attention difficulties and holoprosencephaly. Arch Dis Child 86:293–296. pmid:11919111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Hong M, Krauss RS (2013) Rescue of holoprosencephaly in fetal alcohol-exposed Cdon mutant mice by reduced gene dosage of Ptch1. PLoS One 8:e79269. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079269 pmid:24244464
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Hynes M, Porter JA, Chiang C, Chang D, Tessier-Lavigne M, Beachy PA, Rosenthal A (1995) Induction of midbrain dopaminergic neurons by Sonic hedgehog. Neuron 15:35–44. pmid:7619528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Jackson ME, Moghaddam B (2001) Amygdala regulation of nucleus accumbens dopamine output is governed by the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 21:676–681. pmid:11160446
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Kabanova A, Pabst M, Lorkowski M, Braganza O, Boehlen A, Nikbakht N, Pothmann L, Vaswani AR, Musgrove R, Di Monte DA, Sauvage M, Beck H, Blaess S (2015) Function and developmental origin of a mesocortical inhibitory circuit. Nat Neurosci 18:872–882. doi:10.1038/nn.4020 pmid:25961790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Koch M, Bubser M (1994) Deficient sensorimotor gating after 6-hydroxydopamine lesion of the rat medial prefrontal cortex is reversed by haloperidol. Eur J Neurosci 6:1837–1845. pmid:7704295
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Kohl S, Heekeren K, Klosterkötter J, Kuhn J (2013) Prepulse inhibition in psychiatric disorders–apart from schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 47:445–452. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.11.018 pmid:23287742
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Kwon YR, Jeong MH, Leem YE, Lee SJ, Kim HJ, Bae GU, Kang JS (2014) The Shh coreceptor Cdo is required for differentiation of midbrain dopaminergic neurons. Stem Cell Res 13:262–274. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2014.07.004 pmid:25117422
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Lammel S, Hetzel A, Häckel O, Jones I, Liss B, Roeper J (2008) Unique properties of mesoprefrontal neurons within a dual mesocorticolimbic dopamine system. Neuron 57:760–773. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.022 pmid:18341995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Manitt C, Labelle-Dumais C, Eng C, Grant A, Mimee A, Stroh T, Flores C (2010) Peri-pubertal emergence of UNC-5 homologue expression by dopamine neurons in rodents. PLoS One 5:e11463. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011463 pmid:20628609
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Manitt C, Mimee A, Eng C, Pokinko M, Stroh T, Cooper HM, Kolb B, Flores C (2011) The netrin receptor DCC is required in the pubertal organization of mesocortical dopamine circuitry. J Neurosci 31:8381–8394. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0606-6011.2011 pmid:21653843
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Manitt C, Eng C, Pokinko M, Ryan RT, Torres-Berrío A, Lopez JP, Yogendran SV, Daubaras MJ, Grant A, Schmidt ER, Tronche F, Krimpenfort P, Cooper HM, Pasterkamp RJ, Kolb B, Turecki G, Wong TP, Nestler EJ, Giros B, Flores C (2013) DCC orchestrates the development of the prefrontal cortex during adolescence and is altered in psychiatric patients. Transl Psychiatry 3:e338. doi:10.1038/tp.2013.105 pmid:24346136
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Matise MP, Epstein DJ, Park HL, Platt KA, Joyner AL (1998) Gli2 is required for induction of floor plate and adjacent cells, but not most ventral neurons in the mouse central nervous system. Development 125:2759–2770.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. ↵
    Meyer U, Engler A, Weber L, Schedlowski M, Feldon J (2008) Preliminary evidence for a modulation of fetal dopaminergic development by maternal immune activation during pregnancy. Neuroscience 154:701–709. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.031 pmid:18495356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Mille F, Tamayo-Orrego L, Lévesque M, Remke M, Korshunov A, Cardin J, Bouchard N, Izzi L, Kool M, Northcott PA, Taylor MD, Pfister SM, Charron F (2014) The Shh receptor Boc promotes progression of early medulloblastoma to advanced tumors. Dev Cell 31:34–47. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2014.08.010 pmid:25263791
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Moghaddam B (2002) Stress activation of glutamate neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex: implications for dopamine-associated psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 51:775–787. pmid:12007451
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Okada A, Charron F, Morin S, Shin DS, Wong K, Fabre PJ, Tessier-Lavigne M, McConnell SK (2006) Boc is a receptor for sonic hedgehog in the guidance of commissural axons. Nature 444:369–373. doi:10.1038/nature05246 pmid:17086203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ (2008) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic.
  48. ↵
    Pierce RC, Kalivas PW (1997) A circuitry model of the expression of behavioral sensitization to amphetamine-like psychostimulants. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 25:192–216. pmid:9403138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Pokinko M, Moquin L, Torres-Berrío A, Gratton A, Flores C (2015) Resilience to amphetamine in mouse models of netrin-1 haploinsufficiency: role of mesocortical dopamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:3719–3729. doi:10.1007/s00213-015-4032-9 pmid:26264903
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Reynolds LM, Makowski CS, Yogendran SV, Kiessling S, Cermakian N, Flores C (2015) Amphetamine in adolescence disrupts the development of medial prefrontal cortex dopamine connectivity in a DCC-dependent manner. Neuropsychopharmacology 40:1101–1112. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.287
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    Roeper J (2013) Dissecting the diversity of midbrain dopamine neurons. Trends Neurosci 36:336–342. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.03.003 pmid:23582338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Scornaiencki R, Cantrup R, Rushlow WJ, Rajakumar N (2009) Prefrontal cortical D1 dopamine receptors modulate subcortical D2 dopamine receptor-mediated stress responsiveness. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 12:1195–1208. doi:10.1017/S1461145709000121 pmid:19275776
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    Séguéla P, Watkins KC, Descarries L (1988) Ultrastructural features of dopamine axon terminals in the anteromedial and the suprarhinal cortex of adult rat. Brain Res 442:11–22. pmid:3359247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Stewart J, Badiani A (1993) Tolerance and sensitization to the behavioral effects of drugs. Behav Pharmacol 4:289–312. pmid:11224198
    OpenUrlPubMed
  55. ↵
    Swerdlow NR, Geyer MA (1998) Using an animal model of deficient sensorimotor gating to study the pathophysiology and new treatments of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 24:285–301. pmid:9613626
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Swerdlow NR, Mansbach RS, Geyer MA, Pulvirenti L, Koob GF, Braff DL (1990) Amphetamine disruption of prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle is reversed by depletion of mesolimbic dopamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 100:413–416. pmid:2315438
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Tenn CC, Kapur S, Fletcher PJ (2005) Sensitization to amphetamine, but not phencyclidine, disrupts prepulse inhibition and latent inhibition. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 180:366–376. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-2253-z
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Van den Heuvel DM, Pasterkamp RJ (2008) Getting connected in the dopamine system. Prog Neurobiol 85:75–93. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.01.003 pmid:18304718
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Ventura R, Alcaro A, Cabib S, Conversi D, Mandolesi L, Puglisi-Allegra S (2004) Dopamine in the medial prefrontal cortex controls genotype-dependent effects of amphetamine on mesoaccumbens dopamine release and locomotion. Neuropsychopharmacology 29:72–80. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300300 pmid:12968132
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Vezina P (1993) Amphetamine injected into the ventral tegmental area sensitizes the nucleus accumbens dopaminergic response to systemic amphetamine: an in vivo microdialysis study in the rat. Brain Res 605:332–337. pmid:8386970
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Vezina P, Blanc G, Glowinski J, Tassin JP (1991) Opposed behavioural outputs of increased dopamine transmission in prefrontocortical and subcortical areas: a role for the cortical D-1 dopamine receptor. Eur J Neurosci 3:1001–1007. pmid:12106258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Vokes SA, Ji H, McCuine S, Tenzen T, Giles S, Zhong S, Longabaugh WJ, Davidson EH, Wong WH, McMahon AP (2007) Genomic characterization of Gli-activator targets in sonic hedgehog-mediated neural patterning. Development 134:1977–1989. doi:10.1242/dev.001966 pmid:17442700
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    Volkow ND, Morales M (2015) The brain on drugs: from reward to addiction. Cell 162:712–725. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.046 pmid:26276628
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    Wallén A, Perlmann T (2003) Transcriptional control of dopamine neuron development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 991:48–60. pmid:12846973
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Wang MZ, Jin P, Bumcrot DA, Marigo V, McMahon AP, Wang EA, Woolf T, Pang K (1995) Induction of dopaminergic neuron phenotype in the midbrain by Sonic hedgehog protein. Nat Med 1:1184–1188. pmid:7584992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Watson RE Jr., Wiegand SJ, Clough RW, Hoffman GE (1986) Use of cryoprotectant to maintain long-term peptide immunoreactivity and tissue morphology. Peptides 7:155–159. pmid:3520509
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ (1991) Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in thesubdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec 231:482–497. doi:10.1002/ar.1092310411 pmid:1793176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    Yam PT, Charron F (2013) Signaling mechanisms of non-conventional axon guidance cues: the Shh, BMP and Wnt morphogens. Curr Opin Neurobiol 23:965–973. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.09.002 pmid:24183376
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Yetnikoff L, Eng C, Benning S, Flores C (2010) Netrin-1 receptor in the ventral tegmental area is required for sensitization to amphetamine. Eur J Neurosci 31:1292–1302. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07163.x pmid:20345916
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Zhang W, Yi MJ, Chen X, Cole F, Krauss RS, Kang JS (2006) Cortical thinning and hydrocephalus in mice lacking the immunoglobulin superfamily member CDO. Mol Cell Biol 26:3764–3772. doi:10.1128/MCB.26.10.3764-3772.2006 pmid:16648472
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    Zhang W, Hong M, Bae GU, Kang JS, Krauss RS (2011) Boc modifies the holoprosencephaly spectrum of Cdo mutant mice. Dis Model Mech 4:368–380. doi:10.1242/dmm.005744 pmid:21183473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Synthesis

The decision was a result of the Reviewing Editor Karen Szumlinski and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus was reached. A fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision is listed below. The following reviewers agreed to reveal their identity: Stephen Rayport, Stefano Puglisi-Allegra

Upon review of the revised article, the 2 expert reviewers and I agree that the report is much improved with respect to the main text. However, there still remains a number of issues with the display items that will require editorial re-review before a final decision can be rendered on the article. Both reviewers have highlighted these dislay item issues.

Reviewer #1:

The authors have responded cogently to the initial reviews.

However, the figures require significant attention.

Figure 1: Panel letters (A, B, C...) and panel labels (DAPI/Ki67/TH) are all in 18 pt; panel letters should be the largest, then panel labels, e.g. 15 pt.. Scale bar lacks calibration; better to put the "100 um" on the figure itself. Caption would be improved with some reporting of what is being shown.

Figure 2: Panel letters and labels are all in 18 pt. Panel F: It is misleading to provide bars that are NS; better to remove.

Figure 3: Panel letters, labels, and anatomical division labels (VTA, SN) are all in 18 pt, and should be hierarchical. Panel C, the panel labels need to be smaller. In the caption, the use of "significant increases" when describing observations in adulthood implies that there is continued proliferation of dopamine neurons; it would be better to say that there are greater numbers of dopamine neurons.

Figure 4: Similarly, "selective increase" in adult mice suggests continued increase, when what was measured was the value in adulthood, so it would be better to use "greater" or "larger" or "is greater in adulthood."

Figure 5: Panels B and D: the statistics should be in the captions (the asterisks do not refer to anything). Panel E: The monochromatic micrographs are hard to see; they should be brightened up, or converted to white on black to improve visibility.

Figure 6: Panels B and C: the injections (vertical lines) needs labels, e.g. vehicle and amphetamine. Panel D: fonts are overall too large. Panel E and F: since previous usage has been to provide a horizontal bar indicating the comparison showing statistical significance, the same should be added here (i.e. a bar over pre vs post in the WT mice).

Figure 7: The asterisks are misused since the statistic is an overall genotypic effect (ANOVA) and individual t-tests are not reported.

Reviewer #2:

All comments have been adequately addressed.

Although I have not been able to find the table 1 in R1 text, I trust that the table reports the items described in the text.

View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 3
May/June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mesocortical Dopamine Phenotypes in Mice Lacking the Sonic Hedgehog Receptor Cdon
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Mesocortical Dopamine Phenotypes in Mice Lacking the Sonic Hedgehog Receptor Cdon
Michael Verwey, Alanna Grant, Nicholas Meti, Lauren Adye-White, Angelica Torres-Berrío, Veronique Rioux, Martin Lévesque, Frederic Charron, Cecilia Flores
eNeuro 29 June 2016, 3 (3) ENEURO.0009-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0009-16.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Mesocortical Dopamine Phenotypes in Mice Lacking the Sonic Hedgehog Receptor Cdon
Michael Verwey, Alanna Grant, Nicholas Meti, Lauren Adye-White, Angelica Torres-Berrío, Veronique Rioux, Martin Lévesque, Frederic Charron, Cecilia Flores
eNeuro 29 June 2016, 3 (3) ENEURO.0009-16.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0009-16.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • Cdon
  • dopamine
  • medial prefrontal cortex
  • sonic hedgehog
  • ventral tegmental area

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Calcium Dynamics in Hypothalamic Paraventricular Oxytocin Neurons and Astrocytes Associated with Social and Stress Stimuli
  • Touchscreen Response Precision Is Sensitive to the Explore/Exploit Trade-off
  • Eye Movements in Silent Visual Speech Track Unheard Acoustic Signals and Relate to Hearing Experience
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.