Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Multiscale Aspects of Generation of High-Gamma Activity during Seizures in Human Neocortex

Tahra L. Eissa, Andrew K. Tryba, Charles J. Marcuccilli, Faiza Ben-Mabrouk, Elliot H. Smith, Sean M. Lew, Robert R. Goodman, Guy M. McKhann Jr, David M. Frim, Lorenzo L. Pesce, Michael H. Kohrman, Ronald G. Emerson, Catherine A. Schevon and Wim van Drongelen
eNeuro 26 April 2016, 3 (2) ENEURO.0141-15.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0141-15.2016
Tahra L. Eissa
1Committee on Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew K. Tryba
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
3Department Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew K. Tryba
Charles J. Marcuccilli
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faiza Ben-Mabrouk
3Department Physiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elliot H. Smith
4Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elliot H. Smith
Sean M. Lew
5Department Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Goodman
6Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York 10029
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guy M. McKhann Jr
4Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Frim
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
7Department Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorenzo L. Pesce
8The Computation Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lorenzo L. Pesce
Michael H. Kohrman
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald G. Emerson
4Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
9Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ronald G. Emerson
Catherine A. Schevon
9Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wim van Drongelen
1Committee on Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
2Departments of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
8The Computation Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
10Committee on Computational Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Methodology. A, Acute slice recording setup with concurrent extracellular and intracellular recordings. SLA and PDSs were induced with the addition of bicuculline and NMDA (black arrow). B, Local seizure activity from patients was recorded with MEAs placed concurrently with cortical grids that measured the ECoG. The power of the HG activity was determined in both individual microelectrode signals (magenta) and averaged MEA activity (blue).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Jitter analysis and synchrony. Cartoon of the jitter analysis in which a randomized delay (shift) was applied to each signal prior to computing the signal average. The jitter simulates levels of asynchrony between the signals, while the average represents the effect of volume conduction (Eq. 1). A, Flowchart of jitter methodology. Each signal within the ensemble is jittered by applying a randomized delay (τi) ranging from 0 to τmax. The jittered signals are then averaged to represent the compound activity of the signals due to volume conduction. We perform power spectral analysis on the averaged activity and determine the amount of HG power in the signal. The amount of HG power is then plotted against the maximum delay (τmax; i.e., the degree of asynchrony). This procedure is repeated for a range of increasing maximum delays (in this example, a range from 0 to 8 ms in steps of 2 ms). B, Set of randomly jittered signals (blue dots mark the center of each signal) drawn from a uniform distribution characterized by a maximum delay, τmax. The red trace is the time average of the jittered dataset. C, The power spectra of the individual signals in the inset of A, and the average of these power spectra (in red). D, The relationship between the power in a time-averaged signal and the degree of asynchrony determined by the maximum delay (τmax) of the applied jitter. The two gray panels depict example datasets: one in which the signals are perfectly synchronized (No jitter, i.e., Max Delay = 0) and one with significant jitter (maximum delay = 4 ms). To quantify the amount of synchrony in a set of signals, we computed the synchrony ratio by dividing the power from the time-averaged power spectrum by the power from the averaged power spectra (i.e., the values marked as 2 in D divided by those marked by 1 in C).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Seizure-like activity produces significant amounts of HG power. A, Example trace of intracellular activities recorded in an acute slice of human neocortical tissue. The arrow marks bath application of bicuculline and NMDA. Insets show examples of PDS and baseline (Base) signals. Intracellular PDSs are characterized by large depolarizations of ∼30 mV above the resting potential that includes depolarization block. This resulted in reduced interburst spike rates, compared with physiological bursts, and decreased spike amplitudes during the burst. Power spectra of intracellular signals show increased power in the HG band (80-150 Hz, gray box) during PDS activity (black trace) compared with baseline (gray trace). B, Same as in A for the extracellular signal recorded simultaneously with the intracellular signal. Insets depict SLA and network baseline activity (Base). Power spectra show an increase in the HG band power during SLA compared with baseline. C, Intracellular, nonsaturating bursting activity from acute human neocortical slice. Baseline (Base) and bursting (Burst) activities are shown in the insets. Power spectra show increased HG power during bursting over baseline. D, Extracellular bursting activity simultaneously recorded in the same slice as C. Power spectra do not show a significant increase of HG power during the network burst. E, Bar graph of intracellular HG power across states, including the mean HG power and SEM, shows a large increase in HG power during both PDSs and nonsaturating bursts. Note the discontinuity in the vertical axis. Dark blue, PDS; light blue, corresponding baseline activity; red, nonsaturating bursts; pink, corresponding baseline activity. F, Bar graph of extracellular HG power across states shows that extracellular recordings from networks with SLA (that included single neurons with PDSs) show significantly more HG power than network recordings from nonsaturating cellular bursts. Dark blue, SLA; light blue, corresponding baseline activity; red, network bursting of networks with nonsaturating cellular bursts; pink, corresponding baseline activity. **p < 0.02.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Power of average HG activity depends on synchrony levels. A, B, Sequential burst events from intracellular (IC) PDS activity (A) and extracellular (EC) SLA slice recordings (B) were detected and used to represent signals generated across multiple locations. Detected burst events (synchronous case, black traces) or randomly selected epochs (asynchronous case, green traces) were then superimposed to mimic volume conduction. These superimposed signals were then averaged, and power spectra were computed (bottom plots; black, synchronous case; green, asynchronous case; gray boxes, HG band 80-150 Hz). C, D, Bar graphs of the mean HG power and SEM of the averaged signals (gray, baseline; green, asynchronous average; black, synchronous average). Result shows a large difference in the amount of HG power (note the discontinuity in the vertical axes) between the synchronous and asynchronous scenarios (**p < 0.02). E, F, Jitter plots showing the amount of HG power retained in a series of averages in which the superimposed signals undergo randomized delays prior to averaging. For each average, these randomized delays are drawn from a uniform distribution ranging from zero to Max Delay (abscissa). Insets detail the drop in HG power retained with maximum delays of <50 ms. Both IC and EC recordings show a dramatic drop in HG power with maximum delays of <10 ms.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Microelectrodes in the core record higher levels of HG power compared with those in the penumbra. Seizure activity from MEA recordings was separated post hoc into the following two distinct territories: (1) the ictal core, defined as the cortical area where low-frequency activity is correlated with high levels of multiunit activity (two patients, four seizures); and (2) the ictal penumbra, where the low-frequency fluctuations are accompanied by uncorrelated and small changes in firing (two patients, four seizures). A, Top, Example microelectrode recording from core territories during a seizure. Bottom, Heat map of HG power detected in 100 ms overlapping epochs across the seizure (50 ms overlap). Channel # corresponds to the single microelectrode channels of the MEA. B, Same as in A for a recording taken from the penumbral territory. C, Examples of power spectra from microelectrodes in the core (orange) and penumbra (yellow) during fully developed seizure. Note that the core shows more power in the HG band. D, Bar graph of the mean and SEM of the HG power from the entire seizure for microelectrode recordings in the ictal core compared with those in the penumbra shows significantly more HG power in the core territories; note the discontinuity in the vertical axis (**p < 0.02).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Averaged MEA activity shows HG power predominantly in the core. A, Example ECoG trace recorded from a cortical grid electrode 1 cm from the MEA location (black), Pseudo-ECoG (orange) produced by averaging the microelectrode channels for a single seizure in the ictal core. Bottom, A heat map of HG power of the Pseudo-ECoG in the ictal core territory. To compute the heat map, we subdivided signals into 100 ms overlapping epochs (50 ms overlap). B, Same as in A for a recording in the penumbra. C, Bar graph of mean and SEM of the HG power of the Pseudo-ECoG activity across the entire seizure in core and penumbra shows more HG power in the averaged activity of the core; note the discontinuity in the vertical axis. D, Since computing the averaged temporal activity takes into account differences in phase between HG activities at each microelectrode, synchrony was measured as a percentage of the HG power retained after temporal averaging compared with the averaged spectra of the individual microelectrodes (Fig. 2; Eq. 4). More power was retained in the core, suggesting a higher level of HG synchrony between these microelectrodes (*p < 0.05).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Synchrony is increased during seizure activity in the core. P, Patient number; S, seizure number. A, Pseudo-ECoG recorded from ictal core territories. In the bar labeled Analysis 1, HG power is determined from the power spectrum of the time average. In contrast, in the Analysis 2 case, HG power is determined in the average spectrum of the individual power spectra of the MEA signals. The bar labeled as Synchrony Ratio represents the ratio between the two analyses (Fig. 2; Eq. 4). Heat maps and synchrony were determined in 100 ms overlapping epochs (overlap, 50 ms). The heat maps represent the averaged spectral activity, and the averaged temporal activity and their synchrony ratio. Right-hand graphs show the result of our jitter analysis, depicting the amount of HG power (ordinate) as a function of the maximum delay (abscissa). Jitter plots from core seizures show a slow decline in HG power. B, Same as in A for seizures recorded from penumbral territories. Note different scales used for the ordinate across the jitter plots.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    HG power observed at microelectrode and macroelectrode scales may result from different mechanisms. A, Example signals of the individual generators in three types of models (I–III) we investigated in the context of the jitter analysis. Model I consists of generators of sinusoidal frequencies within the HG band. Model II represents the interaction of the HG oscillation with a sinusoidal oscillator of lower frequency. This model consisted of the following three subtypes: (1) an additive effect of the low- and high-frequency oscillations; (2) the amplitude of the HG oscillation is modulated; and (3) the HG frequency is modulated. The model III generators are nonsinusoidal, resulting in harmonics within the HG power band. B, Model I, Equation 7, predicts a steep decline in the compound HG power when small amounts of jitter are added to the system. This model result closely matches the rapid depletion of HG power seen in the jitter analysis of the in vitro signals (Fig. 4). Both the analytical result (red) and a stochastic simulation of the same model (blue) are plotted. C, Filtered microelectrode signals from in vivo MEA recordings at the ictal core (filter band, 80-150 Hz). This example of HG activity across microelectrodes in the MEA shows significant bursts of HG power originating from the slower dominant seizure oscillation. In addition, ongoing HG oscillations show a small amount of baseline desynchronization of ∼10 ms (inset). These delays are not unexpected for the network size involved in this measurement. Considering the dimensions of the array, 96 electrodes distributed in a 4 × 4 mm area, this corresponds to propagation rates that are bounded at ≤50 mm/s, showing a clear overlap with the range of propagation velocities between 20 and 100 mm/s observed during disinhibited slice activity (Trevelyan et al., 2006). D, Prediction of model III, Equation 9. Analytic and stochastic results are plotted as in A. Because of the baseline asynchrony in the in vivo recordings C, we ignored delays of <10 ms in this model. This scenario can explain a drop-off similar to those observed in the jitter plots of the in vivo data (Fig. 7).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinical and demographic data for slice tissue

    Patient numberSlice numberActivity typeAge at time of resection (years)/sexTissue sample locationPathologySeizure type
    1S1PDS12/FLeft temporalCortical dysplasiaComplex partial, generalized tonic-clonic
    S2PDSParietal- occipital
    2S3PDS8/MLeft occipitalCortical
    dysplasia
    Complex partial
    S4Burst
    3S5PDS5/FRight frontalNonspecificComplex partial
    4S6Burst8/FRight anterior frontalNonspecificComplex partial
    Left clonic
    5S7Burst17/FLeft parietalCortical dysplasiaComplex partial, simple partial
    6S8Burst15/MLeft temporalCortical DysplasiaComplex partial
    7S9Burst18/MRight frontalMild neuronal ischemiaComplex
    partial
    S10PDS
    S11PDS
    S12PDS
    • Burst, Neurons show nonsaturating burst firing; F, female; M, male.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    clinical and demographic data for patients implanted with MEAs

    P1 (32 years/F)P2 (19 years/F)P3 (30 years/M)P4 (39 years/M)
    Implant locationLeft lateral and
    subtemporal
    Right lateral and
    subtemporal, parietal,
    occipital
    Left lateral frontal,
    mesial frontal,
    temporal
    Left lateral and
    mesial frontal
    MEA locationLeft inferior
    temporal gyrus
    2.5 cm from
    anterior temporal pole
    Right posterior
    temporal, 1 cm
    inferior to
    angular gyrus
    Left supplementary
    motor area, 3
    cm superior to
    Broca’s area
    Left lateral
    frontal 2 cm
    superior to
    Broca's area
    Seizure onset
    zone
    Left basal/anterior
    temporal, (including
    MEA site)
    Right posterior
    lateral temporal,
    (including MEA
    site)
    Left supplementary
    motor area
    (including
    MEA site)
    Left frontal
    operculum
    (3 × 3 cm
    cortical area,
    including
    MEA site)
    Days recorded52844
    Number of seizures
    analyzed
    3113
    Seizure TypesComplex partialComplex partial
    with secondary
    generalization
    Complex partial/tonicComplex partial
    Pathologymild CA1 neuronal
    loss; lateral
    temporal
    nonspecific
    NonspecificN/A (multiple subpial
    transections
    performed)
    Nonspecific
    • F, Female; M, male; N/A, not applicable; P, patient.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Statistics table

    Data structureType of test95% confidence intervals
    A–Extracellular SLA vs baselineBootstrappedDifference of the means32e3–137e3 µV2
    B–Intracellular PDS vs baselineBootstrappedDifference of the means0.82e7–2.1e7 µV2
    C–PDS vs normal burstingBootstrappedDifference of the means−2.6e7 to 1.4e7 µV2
    D–SLA vs non-SLABootstrappedDifference of the means21e3–116e3 µV2
    E–Extracellular synch vs asynchNonparametricWilcoxon signed-rank1–1*
    F–Intracellular synch vs asynchNonparametricWilcoxon signed-rank1–1*
    G–Extracellular asynch vs baselineNonparametricWilcoxon signed-rank0.25–1
    H–Intracellular asynch vs baselineNonparametricWilcoxon signed-rank0.25–1
    I–Core vs penumbra microelectrodesBootstrappedDifference of the means0.49e5–4.2e5 µV2
    J–Core vs penumbra averaged activityNonparametricWilcoxon rank sum1–1*
    K–Core vs penumbra percentage differenceNonparametricWilcoxon rank-sum1–1*
    • *Distributions are perfectly separated.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 2
March/April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Multiscale Aspects of Generation of High-Gamma Activity during Seizures in Human Neocortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Multiscale Aspects of Generation of High-Gamma Activity during Seizures in Human Neocortex
Tahra L. Eissa, Andrew K. Tryba, Charles J. Marcuccilli, Faiza Ben-Mabrouk, Elliot H. Smith, Sean M. Lew, Robert R. Goodman, Guy M. McKhann Jr, David M. Frim, Lorenzo L. Pesce, Michael H. Kohrman, Ronald G. Emerson, Catherine A. Schevon, Wim van Drongelen
eNeuro 26 April 2016, 3 (2) ENEURO.0141-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0141-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Multiscale Aspects of Generation of High-Gamma Activity during Seizures in Human Neocortex
Tahra L. Eissa, Andrew K. Tryba, Charles J. Marcuccilli, Faiza Ben-Mabrouk, Elliot H. Smith, Sean M. Lew, Robert R. Goodman, Guy M. McKhann Jr, David M. Frim, Lorenzo L. Pesce, Michael H. Kohrman, Ronald G. Emerson, Catherine A. Schevon, Wim van Drongelen
eNeuro 26 April 2016, 3 (2) ENEURO.0141-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0141-15.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • epilepsy
  • HFOs
  • human
  • modeling
  • neocortex
  • seizure

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Gene variants related to primary familial brain calcification: perspectives from bibliometrics and meta-analysis
  • Expression of HDAC3-Y298H Point Mutant in Medial Habenula Cholinergic Neurons Has No Effect on Cocaine-Induced Behaviors
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.