Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Ablation of Type-1 IFN Signaling in Hematopoietic Cells Confers Protection Following Traumatic Brain Injury

Ila P. Karve, Moses Zhang, Mark Habgood, Tony Frugier, Kate M. Brody, Maithili Sashindranath, C. Joakim Ek, Stephane Chappaz, Ben T. Kile, David Wright, Hong Wang, Leigh Johnston, Maria Daglas, Robert C. Ates, Robert L. Medcalf, Juliet M. Taylor and Peter J. Crack
eNeuro 4 February 2016, 3 (1) ENEURO.0128-15.2016; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0128-15.2016
Ila P. Karve
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Moses Zhang
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Habgood
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tony Frugier
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kate M. Brody
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maithili Sashindranath
2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Joakim Ek
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephane Chappaz
3ACRF Chemical Biology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephane Chappaz
Ben T. Kile
3ACRF Chemical Biology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Wright
4Florey Imaging, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hong Wang
4Florey Imaging, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leigh Johnston
4Florey Imaging, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia 3052
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Daglas
2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert C. Ates
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert L. Medcalf
2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3004
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliet M. Taylor
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter J. Crack
1Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Peter J. Crack
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photomicrographs showing the full extent of the infarct in an 8- to 10-week-old C57BL6/J WT mouse. Images are of 10-μm-thick H&E-stained sections from a mouse perfused 24 h after injury. Sections are labeled s10–s100. Damaged tissue is defined by a decrease in H&E staining intensity and an example of border demarcation is illustrated in these images. Scale bar, 20 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    TBI induces type-1 IFN release and downstream STAT3/IRF7 activation in an IFNAR1-dependent manner. A, IFNα and IFNβ mRNA levels are elevated in ipsilateral hemispheres of WT compared with IFNAR1−/− mice 2 and 24 h following TBI, respectively. Data represent mean± SEM, n=3 per group. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001. B, pSTAT3 immunoreactivity is observed 6 h following TBI in WT but not IFNAR1−/− neuronal cells (labeled with Fox3) in the ipsilateral hemispheres compared to sham-operated mice. pSTAT3 induction is demonstrated in both WT and IFNAR1−/− neurons 24h after TBI. C, Six hours after TBI, pSTAT3 expression is increased in WT, but not IFNAR1−/− mouse astrocytes (labeled with GFAP) in the ipsilateral hemispheres compared to sham-operated controls. pSTAT3 is expressed in both WT and IFNAR1−/− astrocytes 24 h after TBI. Images are representative of n=3 independent experiments. Scale bar, 50 μm. D IRF7 mRNA levels are elevated in ipsilateral hemispheres of WT compared with IFNAR1−/− mice 2 h following TBI. Data represent mean± SEM, n=3 per group. **p<0.01.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Absence of IFNAR1 contributes to a smaller infarct volume in mice 24 h after TBI. A Representative 10-µm-thick H&E-stained coronal brain section from a WT and IFNAR1−/− mouse given TBI. B IFNAR1−/− mice have significantly reduced infarct volumes compared with WT mice 24 h after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM. *p<0.0; n=6 animals per group. Scale bar, 2 mm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    IFNAR1−/− mice display lower levels of proinflammatory cytokines and higher levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in ipsilateral hemispheres compared to WT mice after TBI. A, IL-1β mRNA levels are elevated at 2, 4, and 24 h after TBI in WT but not IFNAR1−/− mice. B, IL-6 mRNA levels are elevated 4 h after TBI in both WT and IFNAR1−/− mice. C, IL-10 mRNA levels are elevated 2 and 4 h after TBI in IFNAR1−/− compared with WT mice. D, WT mice display elevated IL-1β protein compared with IFNAR1−/− mice 6 h after TBI. E, IL-6 protein levels are elevated in WT compared with IFNAR1−/− mice 2 h after TBI. F, IFNAR1−/− mice display higher levels of IL-10 protein compared to WT mice 2 and 24 h after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM, n=3 per group. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    IFNAR1−/− mice exhibit increased GFAP staining compared with WT mice after TBI. A, Representative image of GFAP staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of WT and IFNAR1−/− mice 24 h after TBI. Scale bar, 200 μm. B, High-resolution image of GFAP staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of WT and IFNAR1−/− mice 24 h after TBI. Image region is outlined in the white box in A. Scale bar, 50 μm. C, Quantification of GFAP staining in TBI mice, using fluorescence intensity values to quantify GFAP levels. Data represent mean ± SEM, n=5 per group. **p<0.01.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Iba-1 levels increase after TBI, and are influenced by type-1 IFN signaling. A, Representative image of Iba-1 staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of WT and IFNAR1−/− mice 24 h after TBI. Scale bar, 200 μm. B, High-resolution image of Iba-1 staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of WT and IFNAR1−/− mice 24 h after TBI. Image region is outlined in the white box in A. Scale bar, 50 μm. C, Quantification of Iba-1 staining in TBI mice using fluorescence intensity values to quantify Iba-1 levels. Data represent mean ± SEM, n=5 per group. p=0.0537.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    IFNAR1−/− microglia exhibit increased CD206 staining compared with WT mice after TBI. CD206 immunoreactivity is observed following TBI in IFNAR1−/− mice at a greater level compared with WT mice 24 h after TBI. CD206 immunoreactivity is colabeled with the microglial marker Iba-1.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Pre- and post-treatment with MAR1 decreases infarct volume in WT mice given TBI both 24 h and 7 d after TBI. A, WT mice were treated 1 h before surgery with MAR1 (0.5 mg) or an IgG isotype control (0.5 mg); infarct was calculated 24 h after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, n=3 animals per group. B, WT mice were treated 30 min after TBI with MAR1 or an IgG isotype control; infarct was calculated 24 h after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, n=6 animals per group. C, WT mice were treated 30 min and 2 d after TBI with MAR1 or an IgG isotype control; infarct was calculated 7 d after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM; *p<0.05, n=8 animals per group.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    MAR1-treated mice display reduced type-1 IFN and proinflammatory cytokine secretion following TBI. A, IFNα mRNA levels are elevated in IgG-treated mice, compared to MAR1-treated mice 2 h after TBI. B, IFNβ mRNA levels are elevated in IgG-treated mice compared with MAR1-treated mice 4 h after TBI. C, IL-1β protein levels are elevated in IgG-treated mice, compared to MAR1-treated mice 4 h after TBI. D, IL-6 protein levels are elevated in IgG-treated mice compared with MAR1-treated mice 4 h after TBI. E, IL-10 protein levels are unchanged by MAR1 treatment after TBI. Data represent mean ± SEM, n=3 per group. *p<0.05, ***p<0.001.

  • Figure 10.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 10.

    MAR1 post-treatment significantly improves behavioral outcome after TBI. Three hours after surgery, TBI mice show significant behavioral impairment compared to sham mice in left hindlimb parameters such as stance–swing ratio, percentage swing in stride, and percentage stance in stride (A–C). Data are presented as values of postinjury–preinjury ratios. Post-TBI administration of MAR1 significantly improves behavioral outcome compared to IgG-treated mice in these parameters (D–F). MAR1 and IgG-treated values are presented as fold-change to TBI. Data represent mean± SEM; *p<0.05, n=10 animals per group.

  • Figure 11.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 11.

    Blocking type-1 IFN signaling in hematopoietic cells engenders protection following TBI. A, MRI T2 images from bone marrow chimeric mice showing TBI lesion 24 h after injury. WT&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;WT mice represent C57BL/6 CD45.1 mice irradiated to abolish hematopoietic cells and reconstituted with BL/6 bone marrow. IFNAR1−/−&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;WT mice represent irradiated C57BL/6 CD45.1 mice reconstituted with IFNAR1−/− bone marrow. WT&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;IFNAR1−/− mice represent irradiated IFNAR1−/− mice reconstituted with C57BL/6 CD45.1 bone marrow. Scale bar, 1 mm. B, MRI T2 images from chimeric mice showing TBI lesion 7 d after injury. C, IFNAR1−/−&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;WT mice have significantly reduced infarct volumes 7 d after injury. Data represent mean± SEM; **p<0.01, n=6–8 animals per group.

  • Figure 12.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 12.

    GFAP immunoreactivity is significantly elevated in IFNAR1−/−&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;WT mice 7 d after TBI. A, Representative tiled images using GFAP immunohistochemistry in chimera groups 7 d after TBI. Scale bar, 200 μm. B, High-resolution image of GFAP staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of all chimeras 7 d after TBI. Image region is outlined in the white box in A. Scale bar, 50 μm. C, Quantification of GFAP staining in TBI mice, using fluorescence intensity values to quantify GFAP levels. Data represent mean ± SEM; n=3 per group, *p=0.0273.

  • Figure 13.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 13.

    Iba-1 immunoreactivity is significantly elevated in IFNAR1−/−&cenveo_unknown_entity_wingdings_F0E0;WT mice 7 d after TBI. A, Representative tiled images using Iba-1 immunohistochemistry in chimera groups 7 d after TBI. Scale bar, 200 μm. B, High-resolution image of Iba-1 staining in the ipsilateral hemisphere of all chimeras 7 d after TBI. Image region is outlined in the white box in A. Scale bar, 50 μm. C, Quantification of Iba-1 staining in TBI mice using fluorescence intensity values to quantify Iba-1 levels. Data represent mean ± SEM; n=3 per group, **p=0.0047.

  • Figure 14.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 14.

    Type-1 IFN transcript levels are altered in humans after TBI, whereas receptor levels are unchanged. A, IFNα mRNA levels are decreased compared with control in patients who died <3 h after TBI. B, IFNβ mRNA levels are elevated compared to control in patients who died >6 h after TBI. C IFNAR1 and IFNAR2 mRNA levels are unchanged in postmortem brains. Samples were taken from the ipsilateral hemisphere of these patients. Samples from the contralateral hemisphere of patients who died >6 h after TBI are represented in the last bar (>6 h CL). Data represent mean ± SEM; n=5–11 patients per group, *p<0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Details of trauma and nontrauma control cases

    Details of 27 trauma and 10 control cases
    CaseAgeSexCause of injuryPMI, hCause of deathSurvival time
    151MMotor vehicle accident60Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    263MHousehold accident70Brain injury<17 min
    327MSuicide84Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    441MSuicide96Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    557FMotor vehicle accident87Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    649MMotor vehicle accident107Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    745MMotor vehicle accident43Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    821MMotor vehicle accident100Brain injury<17 min
    941.3MAviation accident114Brain + multiple injuries<17 min
    1057.6FMotor vehicle accident97Brain injury<17 min
    1116.8MMotor vehicle accident85Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1278.7MHousehold accident45Brain injury<3 h
    1318.3MMotor vehicle accident79Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1434.7MMotorbike accident66Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1522.9FMotor vehicle accident108Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1652.8MMotorbike accident65Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1719.6MSuicide33Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1859.8MMotor vehicle accident71Brain + multiple injuries<3 h
    1946.0MFall129Brain injury6 h
    2056.3MMotor vehicle accident65Brain injury8 h
    2164.6MFall61Brain injury8 h
    2275.9MStaircase fall89Brain injury10 h
    2359.6FMotor vehicle accident80Brain injury35 h
    2461.7MFall40Brain injury93 h
    2538.9FStaircase fall101Brain injury122 h
    2670.9MMotor vehicle accident114Brain injury76 h
    2773.7MFall91Brain injury29 h
    Controls
    2816M——Suicide by hanging—
    2948.7M—50Cardiac failure—
    3051.6M—64Asthma—
    3152.3M—52Cardiomyopathy—
    3259.6M—43Pulmonary embolism—
    3364.1M—24Ischaemic heart disease—
    3466.9M—10Pneumonia—
    3564.4M—24Pulmonary embolism—
    3677.5M—53Myocardial infarction—
    3760F—48Myocardial infarction—
    • Cases 1–10: cases with a survival time between 0 and 17 mins; Cases 11–18: cases with a survival time between 30 min and 3 h; Cases 19–27: cases with a survival time between 6 and 261 h; Cases 28–37: control cases. All brains were obtained at autopsy. PMI, Postmortem interval (time between death and brain retrieval); M, male; F, female.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of statistics from figures

    FigurePanelData structure#Test typep value
    2AiNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    A iiNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.001
    A iiiNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.01
    3BNormalStudents t testp=0.0047
    4ANormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.001
    CNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    DNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    ENormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    FNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.01
    5CNormalStudents t testp=0.001
    6CNormalStudents t testp=0.0537
    8ANormalStudents t testp=0.0438
    BNormalStudents t testp=0.0001
    CNormalStudents t testp=0.0353
    9ANormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.001
    BNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    CNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    DNormalTwo-way ANOVA, Bonferoni post hocp<0.05
    10ANormalStudents t testp=0.0277
    BNormalStudents t testp=0.0255
    CNormalStudents t testp=0.0288
    DNormalStudents t testp=0.0124
    ENormalStudents t testp=0.0156
    FNormalStudents t testp=0.0153
    11CNormalOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett post hocp=0.0003
    12CNormalOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett post hocp=0.0273
    13CNormalOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett post hocp=0.0047
    14ANormalOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett post hocp=0.0019
    BNormalOne-way ANOVA, Dunnett post hocp=0.0001
    • Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism6.

    • #Kolmogorov–Smirnov test (with Lilliefors correction) was used to test for normality within each group.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 3 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 3, Issue 1
January/February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ablation of Type-1 IFN Signaling in Hematopoietic Cells Confers Protection Following Traumatic Brain Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Ablation of Type-1 IFN Signaling in Hematopoietic Cells Confers Protection Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Ila P. Karve, Moses Zhang, Mark Habgood, Tony Frugier, Kate M. Brody, Maithili Sashindranath, C. Joakim Ek, Stephane Chappaz, Ben T. Kile, David Wright, Hong Wang, Leigh Johnston, Maria Daglas, Robert C. Ates, Robert L. Medcalf, Juliet M. Taylor, Peter J. Crack
eNeuro 4 February 2016, 3 (1) ENEURO.0128-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0128-15.2016

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Ablation of Type-1 IFN Signaling in Hematopoietic Cells Confers Protection Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Ila P. Karve, Moses Zhang, Mark Habgood, Tony Frugier, Kate M. Brody, Maithili Sashindranath, C. Joakim Ek, Stephane Chappaz, Ben T. Kile, David Wright, Hong Wang, Leigh Johnston, Maria Daglas, Robert C. Ates, Robert L. Medcalf, Juliet M. Taylor, Peter J. Crack
eNeuro 4 February 2016, 3 (1) ENEURO.0128-15.2016; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0128-15.2016
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • neuroinflammation
  • traumatic brain injury
  • type-1 interferon

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • GABAB Receptor signaling in CA1 Pyramidal Cells is not Regulated by Aging in the APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Amyloid Pathology
  • C. elegans Spastin/spas-1 Is Required for Axon Regeneration and Maintenance
  • The Single-Prolonged Stress Model Fails to Produce Behavioral or Corticosterone Alterations in Rats
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.