Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Functional Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons after Traumatic Brain Injury

Laura E. Villasana, Kristine N. Kim, Gary L. Westbrook and Eric Schnell
eNeuro 14 September 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0056-15.2015; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0056-15.2015
Laura E. Villasana
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristine N. Kim
2VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary L. Westbrook
3The Vollum Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gary L. Westbrook
Eric Schnell
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
2VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric Schnell
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Transgenic POMC-EGFP mice demonstrate CCI-induced neurogenesis and increased dispersion of immature granule cells. A, Representative images of the extent of cortical damage 2 weeks following CCI. The noninjured (contralateral) sides are marked by notches in the cortical tissue placed during processing. B, C, Representative images of GFP+ cells in the dorsal (B) and ventral (C) hippocampus of sham and CCI-treated mice 2 weeks after surgery, both ipsilateral and contralateral to injury. D, CCI-treated mice had more GFP+ cells on the injured hemisphere compared to sham mice (**p = 0.00013, n = 7 and 8 mice/group). E, Representative images of GFP+ cell dispersion in the granule cell layer of the ipsilateral dentate gyrus. F, CCI-treated mice had increased cell migration away from the SGZ on the injured hemisphere compared with sham mice (***p = 0.00018, n = 6 mice/group; white and black bars represent sham and CCI-treated mice, respectively). G, A greater percentage of GFP+ cells from CCI-treated mice migrated into the molecular layer (ML) of the ipsilateral dentate gyrus (**p = 0.002811, n = 6 mice/group).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Granule cells born after CCI have accelerated dendritic growth. A, Confocal image of BrdU+ cells expressing GFP in POMC-EGFP mice, used to precisely date the birth of cells for morphologic analysis. In this example, BrdU was administered to POMC-EGFP mice 5 d after CCI or sham procedure and perfusion was fixed at 14 d, so that BrdU+ cells were 9 d postmitosis. Traced cells are outlined in white. B, Representative images (top) of dendritic tracings of 7-, 9-, and 12-d-old GFP+ cells in sham and CCI-treated mice, and the Sholl analyses (bottom) for group data at each time point. In each cohort, CCI increased the number of dendritic branch points of immature cells born during post-traumatic neurogenesis (p = 0.002713). Branches also occurred closer to the cell body in CCI-treated mice in each cohort, which was independent of cell age (p = 0.7615). C, Representative images of GFP+ cells and their dendritic outgrowth. White arrows point to the first dendritic branch points. D–F, GFP+ cells from CCI treated mice branched closer to their cell body (***p = 0.001216; D), had more cumulative branches (***p = 0.000517; E), and had greater total dendritic length (***p = 0.00118; F).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Immature granule cells born after TBI are excitable and integrated into the hippocampal circuitry. A, Current-clamp recordings from GFP-positive immature granule cells born after sham or CCI surgery demonstrate that cells born after TBI fire action potentials during depolarizing current injection. Respective voltage traces during current injections of +5 pA (red), +10 pA (green), +30 pA (blue), and +40 pA (black) for both sham and CCI-treated animals are shown. Summary data are given in the text. B, C, Single-cell, voltage-clamp recordings demonstrate that immature granule cells have similar voltage-dependent action currents. B, Averaged action currents from example cells during steps of +20, +40, and +60 mV from a holding potential of −70 mV. C, Summary data of the amplitude of the action current response in response to the various steps between groups (sham = 7 cells; CCI = 7 cells; p = 0.6554 with a +40 mV step; p = 0.7555 with a +60 mV step). D, Synaptic currents elicited in immature adult-born neurons in response to stimulation at the IML/MML border, while voltage clamping the cells to −70, −40, 0, and +40 mV. E, Summary data of response amplitudes of evoked currents (recorded while clamping cells at +40 mV), demonstrating almost complete block of the evoked synaptic response by the GABAAR antagonist SR95531 (10 μm; n = 5 cells per group). F, G, High-power imaging of dendrites from newborn neurons in sham and CCI-treated mice show no evidence of dendritic spines on immature GFP+ cells in either condition.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Tamoxifen administration pulse labels adult born neurons in DcxCre/tdTomato mice. A, Tamoxifen (TAM) was administered to adult DcxCre/tdTom mice, and they were fixed at two different time intervals thereafter. Early after TAM administration (left), tdTom+ cells have immature dendritic morphologies and stain for the immature marker Dcx, indicating recent mitosis. After 3 weeks (right), tdTom+ cells no longer costain for Dcx, suggesting that labeled cells mature, and that no new immature cells have been labeled. The minor overlap of red and green in the projected image at 26 d after TAM administration reflects the overlap of separate cells in the stack and not coexpression. B, DcxCre/tdTom mice received BrdU to mark cells born either before (left) or after (right) adult TAM administration, and were fixed 3 weeks later. Cells born before TAM administration are efficiently labeled by tdTom expression, but cells born after TAM did not express tdTom, indicating that neurons born just prior to tamoxifen administration are selectively pulse labeled. Scale bar, 50 μm.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Neurons born shortly after CCI survive and maintain their aberrant localization in maturity. A, Representative images of ∼4-week-old tdTom+ cells from the ipsilateral hippocampus of DcxCre/tdTom sham and CCI-treated mice, in which cells born after CCI were permanently pulse labeled with tdTomato. B, One month after injury, CCI-treated mice had more tdTom+ cells in the ipsilateral granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus compared with sham mice (**p = 0.008729, n = 6 mice/group). C, Representative images of tdTom+ cell dispersion in the granule cell layer of the ipsilateral dentate gyrus. D, CCI-treated mice had greater cell migration in the ipsilateral dentate gyrus compared with sham mice (*p = 0.04230, n = 6 mice/group).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    CCI-induced changes in the dendritic morphology of newborn neurons persist as these cells mature. A, Representative images of 4-week-old tdTom+ cells from sham and CCI-treated mice. Arrows point to the first dendritic branch point of selected cells. B, Representative tracings of tdTom+ cells from sham and CCI-treated mice. C, Sholl analyses of dendritic arborization of tdTom+ cells reveal a CCI-induced persistent increase in the number of branch points observed near the soma (*p = 0.0001, 0.003, 0.004, 0.003, and 0.049 for each 10 μm increment between 10 and 50 μm from the soma34), but a reduction in more distal regions (**p = 0.038, 0.002, 0.001, 0.009, 0.003, 0.003, 0.004, and 0.038 for each 10 μm increment between 150 and 220 μm from the soma34; n = 26 cells from 7 sham mice; 28 cells from 8 CCI-treated mice). D–F, tdTom+ cells from CCI-treated mice branched closer to their cell body (***p = 0.000135; D), and had wider angles (***p = 0.000736; E) and area (*p = 0.04037; F) between the dendrites that were farthest apart. G, tdTom+ cells from sham and CCI-treated mice had similar cumulative dendritic lengths (p = 0.5056).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    CCI increased the heterogeneity of dendritic branch morphology in cells born after injury. A, Representative morphology of tdTom+ cells categorized according to their dendritic phenotype. B, The majority of tdTom+ cells in sham mice were characterized by a single apical dendrite that branched farther away from the cell body (>10 μm from soma, typical cell), whereas the majority of tdTom+ cells in CCI-treated mice branched more proximal to their somata (<10 μm), had more than one apical dendrite, or had an apical dendrite that projected laterally from their soma (<30° from GCL). There were fewer typical tdTom+ cells in CCI-treated mice compared with sham mice (p = 0.02138, n = 5 mice/group).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Granule cells born after TBI become functionally integrated into the hippocampal circuit. A, At 1 month after injury, single-cell recordings demonstrate normal firing patterns and the excitability of cells born early after TBI. Voltage traces show the response of adult-born granule cells to current injections of −10, +10, and +50 pA. B, C, Whole cell, voltage-clamp recordings of mEPSCs demonstrate that cells born after TBI acquire excitatory synaptic connections (B), and that mEPSC amplitude and frequency (C) are similar to those recorded from adult-born cells of similar age in sham animals (n = 8 and 9 cells for sham and CCI, respectively; p > 0.4 each). Each graph depicts summary data (bars) and individual cell data (points). D, At 1 month after injury, cells born early following TBI possess dendritic spines within the dentate molecular layer, and dendritic spine density is similar in cells born after sham or CCI procedures (sham, n = 16 cells; CCI, n = 22 cells; p = 0.6053). E, Images of dendritic spines from cells born after CCI or sham procedure.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Granule cells born after TBI acquire perforant path inputs and maintain balanced functional connectivity between signaling pathways. A, Stimulation of the dentate molecular layer evokes both excitatory and inhibitory currents in cells born after sham and CCI procedures. Inhibitory currents were recorded while voltage clamping adult-born cells to 0 mV (red traces), and excitatory currents (black) were recorded at −70 and +40 mV in the presence of the GABAAR inhibitor SR95531, with the stimulation intensity and electrode position kept constant. B, The ratio of evoked inhibitory current amplitude (at 0 mV) to excitatory current amplitude (AMPAR mediated at −70 mV) was measured for single cells with the same stimulation parameters. This inhibition/excitation ratio (I:E ratio) was similar for cells born after sham or CCI (p = 0.4250; n = 9 and 13 cells). C, The ratio of AMPAR- to NMDAR-mediated currents at perforant path synapses was similar for cells born after CCI (p = 0.7751; n = 11 and 16 cells). D, E, Paired-pulse facilitation was not different at perforant path synapses for cells between groups. D, Example traces show overlaid pairs of responses with interpulse intervals of 50, 100, and 250 ms for cells born after both sham and CCI. E, Summary data show no difference in paired-pulse facilitation between groups (p = 0.8652, 0.8252, and 0.6852 for 50, 100, and 250 ms interspike intervals, respectively; sham, n = 8; CCI, n = 11 cells from 3 mice/condition).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Statistical table

    Data structureType of testPower
    1Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.94
    2Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.24
    3Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.87
    4Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.03
    5Non-normal distributionKruskal–Wallis0.97
    6Non-normal distributionDunn’s post hoc0.60
    7Non-normal distributionDunn’s post hoc0.50
    8Normal distributionFisher’s LSD0.91
    9Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.96
    10Normal distributionTwo-way ANOVA0.44
    11Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0.84
    12Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0. 12
    13Normal distributionThree-way repeated-measures ANOVA0.32
    14Normal distributionFisher’s LSD0.27, 0.78, 0.94, 0.97, 0.34, 0.03, 0.08, 0.11, 0.08, and 0.04 for each branch point
    15Normal distributionThree-way repeated-measures ANOVA0.56
    16Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.90
    17Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.94
    18Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.91
    19Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.08
    20Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.12
    21Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.31
    22Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.04
    23Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.12
    24Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.16
    25Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.22
    26Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.69
    27Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.16
    28Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.19
    29Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0.74
    30Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0.54
    31Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0.72
    32Normal distributionTwo-way repeated-measures ANOVA0.99
    33Normal distributionTwo-way repeated-measures ANOVA0.47
    34Normal distributionFisher’s LSD0.95, 0.87, 0.85, 0.86, and 0.51 for branch points between 10 and 50 μm from the soma; 0.55, 0.90, 0.94, 0.76, 0.86, 0.86, 0.85, and 0.55 for branch points between 150 and 220 μm from the soma
    35Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.97
    36Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.92
    37Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.54
    38Non-normal distributionMann–Whitney U test0.64
    39Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.09
    40Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.06
    41Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.03
    42Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.04
    43Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.06
    44Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.06
    45Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.05
    46Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.22
    47Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.27
    48Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.04
    49Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.06
    50Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.12
    51Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.05
    52Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.04 and 0.06 for PPF 50, 100, and 250 ms
    53Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.08
    54Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.07
    55Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.05
    56Normal distributionTwo-tailed t test0.10
    • PPF, Paired-pulse facilitation.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 2 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 2, Issue 5
September/October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons after Traumatic Brain Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Functional Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons after Traumatic Brain Injury
Laura E. Villasana, Kristine N. Kim, Gary L. Westbrook, Eric Schnell
eNeuro 14 September 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0056-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0056-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Functional Integration of Adult-Born Hippocampal Neurons after Traumatic Brain Injury
Laura E. Villasana, Kristine N. Kim, Gary L. Westbrook, Eric Schnell
eNeuro 14 September 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0056-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0056-15.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Material and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • adult neurogenesis
  • functional integration
  • hippocampus
  • maturation
  • synaptic integration
  • traumatic brain injury

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • The Ventral Pallidum Innervates a Distinct Subset of Midbrain Dopamine Neurons
  • The PDGFBB-PDGFRβ Pathway and Laminins in Pericytes Are Involved in the Temporal Change of AQP4 Polarity during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Pathogenesis
  • Rethinking Alzheimer's: Harnessing Cannabidiol to Modulate IDO and cGAS Pathways for Neuroinflammation Control
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.