Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Rapid, Coordinate Inflammatory Responses after Experimental Febrile Status Epilepticus: Implications for Epileptogenesis

Katelin P. Patterson, Gary P. Brennan, Megan Curran, Eli Kinney-Lang, Celine Dubé, Faisal Rashid, Catherine Ly, Andre Obenaus and Tallie Z. Baram
eNeuro 8 October 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0034-15.2015; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0034-15.2015
Katelin P. Patterson
1Department of Anatomy/Neurobiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary P. Brennan
2Department of Pediatrics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gary P. Brennan
Megan Curran
1Department of Anatomy/Neurobiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Megan Curran
Eli Kinney-Lang
2Department of Pediatrics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
4Department of Radiation Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California 92350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Celine Dubé
2Department of Pediatrics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Faisal Rashid
4Department of Radiation Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California 92350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Ly
1Department of Anatomy/Neurobiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andre Obenaus
4Department of Radiation Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California 92350
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tallie Z. Baram
1Department of Anatomy/Neurobiology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
2Department of Pediatrics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
3Department of Neurology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    eFSE parameters. A, No statistical differences of mean core temperature exists between litters (or day of eFSE induction; n = 61 over 14 litters). B, eFSE data arranged by experimental group show no difference in mean core temperatures during eFSE (n = 61 experimental groups are distinguished with numbers 1–6 on the x-axis). No animal used in this study had a mean core temperature during eFSE that exceeded 41.5°C. C, Elevated core temperatures after the first 2 min of eFSE were similar for the duration of eFSE (n = 61 time of core temperature reading are delineated in 2 min epochs across the x-axis). No overt differences in structure or cell fallout were apparent 24 h after the end of eFSE in hippocampus or amygdala using H&E staining (D–F'). CTL, Control. LA, lateral amygdala. BLA, basolateral amygdala.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Activated microglia after eFSE. IBA1-IR cells are visible 24 h after eFSE in dorsal hippocampus in both eFSE rats (A, B, C) and control rats (A', B', C'). D, While the number of IBA1-IR cells is similar between the eFSE group (n = 4) and control group (n = 4), eFSE rats have a larger percentage of amoeboid microglia. Ramified (or nonactivated) microglia have slender, long processes with small soma, while amoeboid (or activated) microglia have short, thick processes with a distinct large soma. Solid arrows point to amoeboid microglia, while empty arrows point to ramified microglia. E, There are no differences in mRNA levels for CD11b (1 h, n = 5; 3 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 6; 96 h, n = 4), which can increase as microglia become active. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Scale bars: A–C', 200 μm; insets, 5 μm. *Statistically significant at p < 0.05. CTL, Control. SO, stratum oriens. SP, stratum pyramidale. SR, stratum radiatum. SLM, lacunosum- moleculare. ML, molecular layer. GCL, granule cell layer. SVZ, subventricular zone.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Activated astrocytes after eFSE. GFAP-IR cells are visible in dorsal hippocampus regions CA1, CA3, and the hilus of the dentate gyrus 24 h after eFSE (A, B, C; n = 4) but not in control rats (A', B', C'; n = 4). Solid arrows depict GFAP+ cells. D, Quantification reveals a significant increase in the number of GFAP-IR cells compared with controls. E, mRNA levels of GFAP are significantly increased 3 and 24 h after eFSE, but not at 1 or 96 h (1 h, n = 5; 3 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 6; 96 h, n = 4). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Scale bars: A–C', 200 μm; insets, 5 μm. *Statistically significant at p < 0.05. CTL, Control. SO, stratum oriens. SP, stratum pyramidale. SR, stratum radiatum. SLM, lacunosum- moleculare. ML, molecular layer. GCL, granule cell layer. SVZ, subventricular zone.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    HMGB1 translocation in hippocampal neurons after eFSE. A, In control animals (n = 3), HMGB1 is confined to the nucleus of cells (open arrows) in area CA1 of dorsal hippocampus. B, One hour after the end of eFSE, HMGB1-IR is seen in the processes of neurons (closed arrows; n = 4), indicating translocation of HMGB1 from the nucleus. C, Translocation is still evident 3 h after the end of eFSE (n = 4). D, By 24 h after eFSE, mostly nuclear HMGB1 is observed (n = 4). E, Quantification of HMGB1 immunocytochemistry as the percentage of HMGB1-IR cells with translocation over total HMGB1-IR cells shows a significant increase in the percentage of HMGB1 translocation 1 and 3 h after eFSE with a return to control conditions by 24 h. F–M, Double labeling of HMGB1 and NeuN (both in soma and processes) demonstrates that HMGB1 translocation occurs from neurons (F–H) and not from astrocytes, as shown with GFAP (I–K), or microglia, as shown with CD11b (L, M; CTL n = 3; 1 h, n = 4; 3 h, n = 4). O, There is no increase in the levels of HMGB1 mRNA, indicating that translocation is achieved using already available protein (1 h, n = 5; 3 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 6; 96 h, n = 4). P, TLR4, one receptor through which proinflammatory HMGB1 acts, mRNA is upregulated 24 h after eFSE with a return to baseline values by 96 h (1 h, n = 5; 3 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 6; 96 h, n = 4). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Scale bars, 100 μm. *Statistically significant at p < 0.05. CTL, Control. SO, stratum oriens. SP, stratum pyramidale. SR, stratum radiatum.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Transient cytokine upregulation after eFSE. A, IL-1β mRNA levels are significantly upregulated 1 and 3 h after eFSE (CTL = 23; 1 h, n = 10; 3 h, n = 10; 24 h, n = 12; 96 h, n = 4). B, Variability of IL-1β mRNA expression between rats is apparent when data are presented as individual animals where some rats have high levels of IL-1β expression and others are indistinguishable from controls. C, IL-1r1 mRNA levels are significantly upregulated 3 and 24 h after eFSE, with obvious interanimal variability (CTL, n = 20l; 1 h, n = 10; 3 h, n = 10; 24 h, n = 13; 96 h, n = 4). D, While never statistically significant, IL-6 levels trend upward for some animals at 24 h with a return to baseline values by 96 h (CTL, n = 9; 1 h, n = 4; 3 h, n = 4; 24 h, n = 10; 96 h, n = 4). E, TNF-α mRNA levels are significantly augmented by 3 h and return to baseline by 24 h (CTL, n = 25; 1 h, n = 10; 3 h, n = 10; 24 h, n = 12; 96 h, n = 4). F, COX2 mRNA levels are significantly upregulated at every tested time point (CTL, n = 11; 1 h, n = 6; 3 h, n = 6; 24 h, n = 6; 96 h, n = 4). G, GFAP, COX2, and IL-6 protein levels are augmented with interanimal variation 24 h after eFSE (n = 4) compared with littermate controls (n = 4). Densitometric analyses of protein levels normalized and compared with controls are provided in H. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *Statistically significant at p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Interanimal variation of inflammatory mediator expression after eFSE. A, Three hours after eFSE, COX2, GFAP, TNF-α, and IL-1r1 levels were significantly increased. When the expression profile of an individual rat is examined across these mediators, trends in expression appear (n = 4). For example, rat 1 has the highest expression across all explored mediators, while rat 4 has virtually no inflammatory response after eFSE. Rats 2 and 3 both fall in between rats 1 and 4, with moderate expression profiles. B, A similar pattern is found 24 h after eFSE as well (n = 6). COX2, IL-1r1, TLR4, and GFAP were all significantly upregulated at this time point. As seen with the 3 h time point, rats with high expression in one mediator have high expression in all others, and vice versa. Rat 6 has the highest expression of all examined mediators, while Rat 5 is a nonresponder.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Inflammation profiles of individual animals correlate with predictive measures of post-eFSE epilepsy. A, Representative color-coded quantitative T2 maps 4–6 h after the end of eFSE from a control animal (n = 9), an eFSE animal not expected to become epileptic (eFSE-Not Affected; n = 5), and an eFSE animal expected to become epileptic (eFSE-Affected; n = 7). Basolateral amygdala (whose T2 relaxation time is used to predict epilepsy) is highlighted in enlarged pictures below. Cooler colors (blues) represent faster T2 relaxation times, while warmer colors (greens and oranges) indicate slower T2 relaxation times. B, Prediction of epilepsy after eFSE is determined when T2 relaxation times of eFSE fall 2 SDs below the control mean, represented here by a black line across the y-axis. C, In hippocampus, the expression of inflammatory molecules is higher in animals expected to become epileptic (Affected) compared with those not expected to become epileptic (Not Affected). D, E, Inverse correlations are found between T2 relaxation times and IL-1r1 (D) and COX2 (E; CTL, n = 4, eFSE n = 6). F, For cytokine correlations in amygdala, 7 of 11 eFSE animals had T2 values low enough to consider them affected. G, Cytokine mRNA data from amygdalar punches 24 h after the end of eFSE demonstrate lower discrimination between affected and nonaffected animals. H, I, Correlations between predictive MRI signal changes were present with IL-1r1 mRNA (H), and a weak correlation existed between T2 levels and TLR4 (I; CTL, n = 9; eFSE, n = 12). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *Statistically significant at p < 0.05. CTL, Control.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Primer sequences used for RT-PCR

    FigureData structureType of testPower
    2D; CA1 Total cellsNormal distributionPaired t test0.4974
    2D; CA3 Total cellsNormal distributionPaired t test0.2679
    2D; hilus Total cellsNormal distributionPaired t test0.3565
    2D; CA1 percentage amoeboidNormal distributionPaired t test0.0030
    2D; CA3 percentage amoeboidNormal distributionPaired t test0.0040
    2D; hilus total cellsNormal distributionPaired t test0.0023
    2ENormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.0016
    3D; CA1Normal distributionPaired t test<0.0001
    3D; CA3Normal distributionPaired t test<0.0001
    3D; hilusNormal distributionPaired t test0.0023
    3ENormal distributionOne-way ANOVA<0.0001
    4ENormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.0027
    4ONormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.6696
    4PNormal distributionOne-way ANOVA<0.0001
    5A, BNormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.0010
    5CNormal distributionOne-way ANOVA<0.0001
    5DNormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.9015
    5ENormal distributionOne-way ANOVA<0.0001
    5FNormal distributionOne-way ANOVA0.0064
    5H; GFAPNormal distributionPaired t test0.0009
    5H; COX2Normal distributionPaired t test0.0044
    5H; IL-6Normal distributionPaired t test0.4225
    7DNormal distributionLinear regression0.0016
    7ENon-GaussianSpearman r0.0022
    7ENon-GaussianSpearman r0.0011
    7HNon-GaussianSpearman r0.0027
    7INon-GaussianSpearman r0.1541
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 2 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 2, Issue 5
September/October 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Rapid, Coordinate Inflammatory Responses after Experimental Febrile Status Epilepticus: Implications for Epileptogenesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Rapid, Coordinate Inflammatory Responses after Experimental Febrile Status Epilepticus: Implications for Epileptogenesis
Katelin P. Patterson, Gary P. Brennan, Megan Curran, Eli Kinney-Lang, Celine Dubé, Faisal Rashid, Catherine Ly, Andre Obenaus, Tallie Z. Baram
eNeuro 8 October 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0034-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0034-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Rapid, Coordinate Inflammatory Responses after Experimental Febrile Status Epilepticus: Implications for Epileptogenesis
Katelin P. Patterson, Gary P. Brennan, Megan Curran, Eli Kinney-Lang, Celine Dubé, Faisal Rashid, Catherine Ly, Andre Obenaus, Tallie Z. Baram
eNeuro 8 October 2015, 2 (5) ENEURO.0034-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0034-15.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • biomarker
  • cytokine
  • epilepsy
  • febrile seizures
  • heterogeneity
  • magnetic resonance imaging

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.