Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Development

Morphological and Phagocytic Profile of Microglia in the Developing Rat Cerebellum

Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen, Jonathan W. VanRyzin and Margaret M. McCarthy
eNeuro 18 August 2015, 2 (4) ENEURO.0036-15.2015; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0036-15.2015
Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen
1Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen
Jonathan W. VanRyzin
1Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
2Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret M. McCarthy
1Department of Pharmacology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
2Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Postnatal microglia across the developing cerebellum. A, A sagittal view of the vermis showing the six lobules used to count microglia (blue background). B, The density of total microglia significantly increased by 1.58-fold in the third postnatal week compared with the first week (*p < 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01 compared with P5; data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 4, 2 males + 2 females for each group). Colored bars depict the proportion of microglia according to morphology at different time points during postnatal development: round/amoeboid microglia are present but infrequent during the first 10 postnatal days while stout microglia are strongly predominant during the first postnatal week, and microglia with both thick and thin processes are more abundant during the second and third week, respectively.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Morphological profile of microglia in the postnatal developing cerebellum. A, The frequency of round/amoeboid microglia significantly decreased after the first postnatal week (B), as well as stout microglia. C, Conversely, the density of microglia with thick processes increased only during the second postnatal week followed by a decrease in the third postnatal week. D, The density of microglia with thin processes gradually increased after the first postnatal week doubling their density by the third postnatal week. E, Sagittal views of the midvermis, labeled with Iba1, across the first 3 postnatal weeks. All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4, 2 males + 2 females for each group). Significant differences are detonated by *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.000 compared with P5. Insets depict a higher magnification of selected microglia (red squares) in each panel. Scale bars: gray scale images, 100 µm; color images (inset), 25 µm; E, 500 µm (from P5 to P21). Images in A, B, C, and D depict the morphology of microglia at two different postnatal ages: P7 (A, B) and P12 (C, D).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Microglial phagocytosis in the postnatal developing cerebellum. A, The highest density of phagocytic cups was observed during the third postnatal week at P17 (***p < 0.000 compared with P5, P7, P10, P12, P14, and P21; n = 4, 2 males + 2 females for each group). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. B, Phagocytic cups exhibited by microglia (red arrows) in the developing cerebellum at P17. Scale bar, 100 µm. C, Microglia with phagocytic cups (top) or microglia without phagocytic cups (bottom row) at different time points during postnatal development. Scale bars, 25 µm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Microglia location in the cerebellar cortex based on morphological classification. A, Total microglia were significantly higher in the GL than the ML during the second and third postnatal week in the cerebellum (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.000). B, The density of round/amoeboid microglia was very low and did not differ between the ML and the GL from P12 to P21. C, The density of stout microglia was significantly higher in the ML than the GL at all days examined except P14 (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.000). D, Microglia with thick processes were the most abundant but did not differ between the ML and the GL. E, There were significantly more microglia with thin processes in the GL than the ML at P17 and P21 but not at younger ages examined (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.000). All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6, 3 males + 3 females for each group).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Frequency of phagocytosis by microglia changes by location in the cerebellar cortex across development. A, The density of phagocytic cups was higher in the ML than the GL at P12 (**p < 0.01), and P14 (*p < 0.05), but switched at P17 (***p < 0.000) and P21 (*p < 0.05), so that the GL exhibited more phagocytic cups than the ML. The highest density of phagocytic cups was found in the GL at P17 compared with P12, P14, and P21 (@p < 0.000). Scale bar, 100 µm. B, Proportion of microglia that exhibited phagocytic cups in the GL at P17: 67% of all phagocytic microglia had thick processes and 33% had thin processes. No round/amoeboid or stout microglia showed phagocytic cups. C, A difference in the density of phagocytic cups was found at younger ages (P15, **p = 0.003; P16, *p = 0.05) compared with P17, but no significant differences were found at older ages (P18, p = 0.583; P19, p = 0.615). In contrast, in the ML, the density of phagocytic cups was lower only at P19 (^p = 0.043) compared with P17. Additionally, a difference in the density of phagocytic cups between the GL and ML was found from P16 to P19 (P16, #p < 0.000; P17; +p < 0.000; P18, &p < 0.000; P19, @p < 0.000) but not at P15 (p = 0.467) (n = 6, 3 males + 3 females for each group for A, B, and C). In this experiment the density of phagocytic cups was not counted in animals at P21 but the dashed lines depict the pattern previously observed at the end of the third postnatal week in both the GL and ML (Fig. 5A ). D, The diameter of microglial phagocytic cups was bigger on P17 compared with P10 (@p = 0.06; see effect size estimation in Table 2), P14 (*p < 0.000) and P21 (#p = 0.003). All data are expressed as mean ± SEM (^n = 4, 2 males + 2 females; *n = 8, 4 males + 4 females: ^P10, *P14, *P17, and *P21).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Identification of pyknotic bodies by Nissl staining in the postnatal developing cerebellum. A, The density of pyknotic bodies (red arrows) decreased only in the GL after the first postnatal week at P14, P17 and P21 (***p < 0.000), but not at P7 (p = 0.302), compared with P5. No changes in the density of pyknotic bodies were detected in the ML across the developmental time points analyzed when compared with P7 (P5, p = 0.199; P14, p = 0.688; P17, p = 0.487; P21, p = 0.375). The GL exhibited more pyknotic bodies than the ML only during the first postnatal week at P5 (#p < 0.000) and P7 (^p < 0.000). Scale bar, 25 µm. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (*n = 6, 3 males + 3 females; ^n = 4, 2 males + 2 females: *P5, ^P7, *P14, *P17, and *P21). B, P7 cerebellar sagittal section stained with cresyl violet showing pyknotic bodies pointed out by red arrows. Pk, Purkinje layer; EGL, external granular layer. C, Confocal colocalization of a pyknotic body (fragmented nucleus in yellow) and a phagocytic cup (red) in the cerebellar cortex at P17. Scale bars, 15 µm. D, 3D confocal image depicting a colocalization of a microglial phagocytic cup (red) and a cleaved caspase-3-positive cell (green) at the tip of a microglia process (white arrow).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Microglial sex differences in the developing cerebellum. A–D, Estimated density of microglia based on morphology in the GL at P17. Males had more microglia with thin processes than females (*p = 0.026). No significant differences were found for sex in round/amoeboid microglia, stout microglia (p = 0.270) or microglia with thick processes (p = 0.127). E–H, Estimated density of microglia based on morphology in the ML at P17. The statistical analysis indicated no sex differences in round/amoeboid (p = 0.375), stout (p = 0.646), microglia with thick processes (p = 0.168), or microglia with thin processes (p = 0.137). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6, 3 males + 3 females for each group).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of statistical analysis*

    Statistical table
    Data structureType of testTest valueEffect sizePower
    aNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 9.559η = 0.730.73
    bNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 8.895η = 0.720.99
    cNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 41.022η = 0.921.00
    dNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 14.074η = 0.801.00
    eNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 93.160η = 0.961.00
    fNormally distributedOne-way ANOVAF(6, 21) = 136.664η = 0.971.00
    gNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 9.667η = 0.420.99
    hNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 0.418—0.13
    iNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 2.84η = 0.180.64
    jNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 0.221—0.09
    kNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 10.517η = 0.440.99
    lNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 30.770η = 0.691.00
    mNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 5.521η = 0.310.97
    nNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 18.271η = 0.531.00
    oNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 2.860—0.38
    pNormally distributedTwo-way ANOVAF(3, 48) = 54.600η = 0.831.00
    q—————
    rt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.278—0.17
    st distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.920—0.48
    tt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 3.445d = 3.4450.73
    ut distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.000—0.12
    vt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 0.496—0.1
    wt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.683—0.26
    xt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.858—0.30
    yt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.044—0.13
    zt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.726—0.27
    aat distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 0.892—0.11
    bbt distributionStudent’s t testt(4) = 1.323—0.18
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of pair comparison tests*

    Developmental profile of microglia and phagocytic cups
    P7P10P12P14P17P21
    aTotal microgliacompared with P5t(6) = 4.534t(6) = 4.534
    d = 3.70
    t(6) = 1.277t(6) = 1.782t(6) = 4.534
    d = 3.70
    t(6) = 4.534
    d = 3.70
    bAmoeboid microgliacompared with P5t(6) = 1.330t(6) = 2.621
    d = 2.14
    t(6) = 3.845
    d = 3.13
    t(6) = 4.045
    d = 3.30
    t(6) = 4.043
    d = 3.30
    t(6) = 4.044
    d = 3.30
    cStout microgliacompared with P5t(6) = 0.395t(6) = 1.886t(6) = 6.416
    d = 5.23
    t(6) = 7.634
    d = 6.23
    t(6) = 8.654
    d = 7.06
    t(6) = 8.373
    d = 6.83
    dMicroglia with thick processescompared with P5t(6) = 2.659
    d = 2.17
    t(6) = 7.858
    d = 6.41
    t(6) = 8.657
    d = 7.06
    t(6) = 5.344
    d = 4.36
    t(6) = 1.926t(6) = 1.574
    eMicroglia with thin processescompared with P5t(6) = 1.000t(6) = 5.078
    d = 4.14
    t(6) = 3.352
    d = 2.73
    t(6) = 4.653
    d = 3.79
    t(6) = 25.466
    d = 20.79
    t(6) = 31.079
    d = 25.37
    fPhagocytic cupcompared with P17P5
    t(6) = 29.336
    d = 23.95
    P7
    t(6) = 26.068
    d = 21.28
    P10
    t(6) = 24.687
    d = 20.15
    P12
    t(6) = 20.255
    d = 16.53
    P14
    t(6) = 11.571
    d = 9.44
    P21
    t(6) = 15.762
    d = 12.86
    Microglia and phagocytic cups in the ML and GL during postnatal development
    gTotal microgliacompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 3.356
    d = 2.12
    GL
    t(10) = 2.640
    d = 1.66
    GL
    t(10) = 3.160
    d = 1.99
    GL
    t(10) = 7.438
    d = 4.70
    hAmoeboid microgliacompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 1.226
    GL
    t(10) = 0.049
    GL
    t(10) = 1.000
    GL
    t(10) = 0.139
    iStoutmicrogliacompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 5.209
    d = 3.29
    GL
    t(10) = 1.192
    GL
    t(10) = 3.354
    d = 2.12
    GL
    t(10) = 8.846
    d = 5.59
    jMicroglia with thick processescompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 1.703
    GL
    t(10) = 1.326
    GL
    t(10) = 0.601
    GL
    t(10) = 1.003
    kMicroglia with thin processescompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 0.604
    GL
    t(10) = 0.116
    GL
    t(10) = 2.191
    d = 1.38
    GL
    t(10) = 6.186
    d = 3.91
    lPhagocytic cupcompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 4.013
    d = 2.53
    GL
    t(10) = 2.400
    d = 1.51
    GL
    t(10) = 6.814
    d = 4.30
    GL
    t(10) = 2.279
    d = 1.44
    Microglial phagocytic activity during the third postnatal week of development
    P15P16P18P19
    mPhagocytic cupcompared with GL
    P17
    GL
    t(10) = 3.978
    d = 2.51
    GL
    t(10) = 2.198
    d = 1.39
    GL
    t(10) = 0.568
    GL
    t(10) = 0.518
    mPhagocytic cupcompared with ML
    P17
    ML
    t(10) = 1.499
    ML
    t(10) = 0.029
    ML
    t(10) = 1.300
    ML
    t(10) = 2.313
    d = 1.46
    P15P16P17P18P19
    mPhagocytic cupcompared with the MLGL
    t(10) = 0.757
    GL
    t(10) = 3.052
    d = 1.93
    GL
    t(10) = 4.091
    d = 2.58
    GL
    t(10) = 7.765
    d = 4.91
    GL
    t(10) = 3.348
    d = 2.11
    Phagocytic cup size during the third postnatal week of development
    P10P14P21
    nPhagocytic cupcompared with
    P17
    t(10) = 2.037
    d = 1.28
    t(14) = 5.262
    d = 2.81
    t(14) = 3.547
    d = 1.73
    Pyknotic bodies in the GL than the ML during postnatal development
    P5P14P17P21
    pPyknotic bodiescompared with GL
    P7
    GL
    t(8) = 0.328
    GL
    t(8) = 34.179
    d = 24.16
    GL
    t(8) = 25.394
    d = 17.95
    GL
    t(8) = 39.642
    d = 28.03
    pPyknotic bodiescompared with ML
    P7
    ML
    t(8) = 1.401
    ML
    t(8) = 0.416
    ML
    t(8) = 0.729
    ML
    t(8) = 0.939
    P5P7P14P17P21
    pPyknotic bodiescompared with MLGL
    t(10) = 7.163
    d = 4.53
    GL
    t(6) = 19.461
    d = 15.88
    GL
    t(10) = 1.628
    GL
    t(10) = 0.100
    GL
    t(10) = 1.392
    Sex differences in microglia morphology on P17 cerebellum
    GLML
    q/uAmoeboid microgliacompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 0.000
    males
    t(4) = 1.000
    r/vStout microgliacompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 1.278
    males
    t(4) = 0.496
    s/wMicroglia with thick processescompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 1.920
    males
    t(4) = 1.683
    t/xMicroglia with thin processescompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 3.445
    d = 3.445
    males
    t(4) = 1.858
    y/zPhagocytic cupcompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 1.044
    males
    t(4) = 1.726
    aa/bbTotal microgliacompared with femalesmales
    t(4) = 0.892
    males
    t(4) = 1.323
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 2 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 2, Issue 4
July/August 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Morphological and Phagocytic Profile of Microglia in the Developing Rat Cerebellum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Morphological and Phagocytic Profile of Microglia in the Developing Rat Cerebellum
Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen, Jonathan W. VanRyzin, Margaret M. McCarthy
eNeuro 18 August 2015, 2 (4) ENEURO.0036-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0036-15.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Morphological and Phagocytic Profile of Microglia in the Developing Rat Cerebellum
Miguel Perez-Pouchoulen, Jonathan W. VanRyzin, Margaret M. McCarthy
eNeuro 18 August 2015, 2 (4) ENEURO.0036-15.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0036-15.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • cell death
  • development
  • microglia
  • phagocytosis
  • sex difference
  • vermis

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
  • Hsc70 Ameliorates the Vesicle Recycling Defects Caused by Excess α-Synuclein at Synapses
Show more New Research

Development

  • Erratic Maternal Care Induces Avoidant-Like Attachment Deficits in a Mouse Model of Early Life Adversity
  • Layer-Specific Glutamatergic Inputs and Parvalbumin Interneurons Modulate Early Life Stress-Induced Alterations in Prefrontal Glutamate Release during Fear Conditioning in Pre-adolescent Rats
  • Treatment of Mitochondrial Disturbances due to Early Life Adversity in Mice Results in Restoration of Complex I Activity and Normal Reward Behavior
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.