Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleNew Research, Neuronal Excitability

Dynamic Input Conductances Shape Neuronal Spiking

Guillaume Drion, Alessio Franci, Julie Dethier and Rodolphe Sepulchre
eNeuro 18 February 2015, 2 (1) ENEURO.0031-14.2015; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0031-14.2015
Guillaume Drion
1Systems and Modeling, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, B-4000, Belgium
2Laboratory of Pharmacology and GIGA Neurosciences, University of Liège, Liège, B-4000, Belgium
3Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachussetts 02454
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alessio Franci
1Systems and Modeling, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, B-4000, Belgium
4Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Dethier
1Systems and Modeling, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, B-4000, Belgium
5Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rodolphe Sepulchre
1Systems and Modeling, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Liège, Liège, B-4000, Belgium
4Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Rodolphe Sepulchre
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Fig. 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1

    Dynamic input conductances shape neuron dynamic sensitivity. a1, Example of an experimental measurement of dynamic input conductances in voltage-clamp. A step of potential ΔV (top) induces a variation in the transmembrane current ΔI (bottom). The values of the currents playing a role in the different timescales are extracted as shown on the figure. a2, Sketch of the mathematical derivation of the dynamic input conductances from an arbitrary conductance-based model. The dynamic input conductances are computed by aggregating the role of the different ionic conductances in each timescale. b, Dynamic input conductances of a STG neuron model for a particular set of parameters either measured in a simulated voltage-clamp experiment (blue bars) or computed following the described mathematical procedure (red lines).

  • Fig. 2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2

    Any ion channel potentially contributes to each of the representative timescales of the membrane potential activity. Top left, Scheme of an arbitrary high-dimensional conductance-based model. Top center, Variations of the membrane potential Vm and the different voltage-gated conductances gi over time for a specific set of ion channel densities. Top right, Decomposition of the temporal traces in three different timescales: fast, slow, and ultraslow. Bottom, Reconstruction of the conductance-based model where the contributions of each variable conductance are grouped by timescales, forming the three dynamic input conductances gf, gs, and gu (see Materials and Methods for details about the rigorous construction).

  • Fig. 3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3

    Dynamic input conductances shape neuronal activity. From left to right: fast (gf), slow (gs), and ultraslow (gu) input conductances as a function of the membrane potential Vm. These curves shape the feedback gain of the neuronal circuit in distinct timescales, thereby determining the dynamical activity.

  • Fig. 4
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4

    Variations of fast, slow, and ultraslow dynamic input conductances near the threshold potential and peak amplitudes shape spiking activity. a, Fast dynamic input conductance for different values of sodium channel density (left) and associated firing activity in the associated conductance-based model (right). Increased sodium channel density induces an increase in the fast dynamic conductance, which results in an increase in action potential amplitude (up to the saturated value VNa). b, Top, Slow input dynamic conductance for different values of A-type potassium channel density (left) and associated firing activity (right). Changes in A-type potassium channel density affect the value of the slow dynamic conductance at spike threshold, which mainly alters neuron burstiness. Bottom, Slow dynamic input conductance for different values of delayed-rectifier potassium channel density (left) and associated firing activity (right). Changes in delayed-rectifier channel density affects the value of the slow dynamic conductance at up-state, which mainly alters spike repolarization capability. c, Ultraslow dynamic input conductance for different values of calcium-activated potassium channel density (left) and associated firing activity (right). Increased potassium channel density increases the negative peak of the ultraslow dynamic conductance in the subthreshold region, resulting in a decrease in the intraburst frequency.

  • Fig. 5
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5

    Sensitivity analysis of model STG neuron spiking activity in the fast (left) and ultraslow (right) timescales. The figure illustrates the six sensitivity curves of the STG model in the fast timescale (a1) and in the ultraslow timescale (b1). The values of the ultraslow sensitivity curves are also plotted at the specific threshold potential, which is a key potential value for excitability properties. a2, Neuronal activity in the absence of sodium and calcium channels (top left), in the presence of sodium channels only (top right), in the presence of T-type calcium channels only (bottom left) and in the presence of slow calcium channels only (bottom right). b2, Neuronal activity (left) and values of the ISIs within each burst (right) of bursters expressing a low (top) and a high (bottom) slow calcium channel density. gu–, Ultraslow negative feedback; gu+ ultraslow positive feedback.

  • Fig. 6
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 6

    Sensitivity analysis of model STG neuron spiking activity in the slow timescale. The figure shows sensitivity curves that extract the effect of conductance variations on the dynamic input conductances (top) and example of predictions that can be made from these sensitivity curves (bottom). a, Sensitivity of the slow dynamic input conductance for each Vm (left), at spike threshold (Vth), and at up-state (Vosc) (center) as well as their localization in Vm (right). b, Model membrane potential variations over time for different value of ḡCa,T, ḡCa,S, and ḡK,d. An increase in both slow and T-type calcium channel densities increases neuron burstiness due to their positive effect at spike threshold. However, an increase in T-type calcium channel density quickly results in depolarization block, due to their positive effect in the up state.

  • Fig. 7
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 7

    Compensation mechanism derived from the sensitivity analysis. a, b, Variation of the slow calcium channel density (top trace) and membrane potential variation over time in the absence and the presence of the compensation mechanism (center traces), and variations of channel densities involved in the compensation mechanism (bottom trace).

  • Fig. 8
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 8

    Colocalization of sensitivity curves, not activation curves, is crucial for robust compensation. a1, Activation functions (left) and sensitivity functions (right) of A-type potassium channels (blue), T-type calcium channels (red), and slow calcium channels (magenta). a2, Membrane potential variations over time before (left) and after a fivefold increase in slow calcium channel density (top right) and T-type calcium channel density (bottom right) in the presence of the compensation mechanism. b1, b2, Same as a1 and a2, respectively, after a right shift of 4.5 mV in A-type potassium channel activation function.

  • Figure R1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure R1

    Comparison of the performances of the compensation mechanism against variations in gcas with and without variations of the applied current Iapp.

  • Figure R2
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure R2

    Comparison of the performances of the compensation mechanism against variations in gcat with and without variations of the applied current Iapp in the robust case (half-activation potential of Ik,A shifted as in Fig. 8 of the main manuscript).

  • Figure R3
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure R3

    Comparison of the shape of the dynamic input conductances when calcium dynamics are neglected (blue) or included (red). (A) Dynamic conductances of one illustration case. (B) Values used in the compensation mechanism. The main effect of the calcium dynamics is to add a positive feedback in the ultraslow timescale at suprathreshold potential. Including calcium dynamics does not significantly affect the values used in the compensation mechanism in our illustration examples.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 2 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 2, Issue 1
January/February 2015
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic Input Conductances Shape Neuronal Spiking
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Dynamic Input Conductances Shape Neuronal Spiking
Guillaume Drion, Alessio Franci, Julie Dethier, Rodolphe Sepulchre
eNeuro 18 February 2015, 2 (1) ENEURO.0031-14.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0031-14.2015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Dynamic Input Conductances Shape Neuronal Spiking
Guillaume Drion, Alessio Franci, Julie Dethier, Rodolphe Sepulchre
eNeuro 18 February 2015, 2 (1) ENEURO.0031-14.2015; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0031-14.2015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • compensation
  • firing pattern
  • ion channels
  • neuromodulation

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

New Research

  • A Very Fast Time Scale of Human Motor Adaptation: Within Movement Adjustments of Internal Representations during Reaching
  • TrkB Signaling Influences Gene Expression in Cortistatin-Expressing Interneurons
  • Optogenetic Activation of β-Endorphin Terminals in the Medial Preoptic Nucleus Regulates Female Sexual Receptivity
Show more New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Investigating Mechanically Activated Currents from Trigeminal Neurons of Nonhuman Primates
  • Postnatal Development of Dendritic Morphology and Action Potential Shape in Rat Substantia Nigra Dopaminergic Neurons
  • Recurrent Interneuron Connectivity Does Not Support Synchrony in a Biophysical Dentate Gyrus Model
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.