Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment

Xiaojie Li, Weilong Fu, Yao Wang, Yuting Gao, Jinhai Wang, Jing Yang, Longji Xu, Fei Gao, Xiao Li and Ning Li
eNeuro 16 February 2026, 13 (3) ENEURO.0294-25.2026; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0294-25.2026
Xiaojie Li
1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300380, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Weilong Fu
1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300380, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yao Wang
1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300380, China
2Tianjin Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Detection Technology and System, Tianjin 300387, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuting Gao
1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300380, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinhai Wang
1School of Life Sciences, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300380, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing Yang
3Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 271016, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Longji Xu
3Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 271016, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fei Gao
3Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 271016, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiao Li
3Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 271016, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ning Li
3Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 271016, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Visual Abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Abstract

Presbycusis, a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder, is characterized by declining speech recognition and has been associated with cognitive impairments across multiple domains. However, the underlying neurobiological mechanisms between presbycusis and cognitive impairments remain unclear. We assessed pure-tone audiometry thresholds (PTA), speech recognition thresholds (SRT), and cognitive abilities in individuals with presbycusis (24 males and 31 females) and healthy controls (23 males and 32 females). Using magnetic resonance imaging, we calculated the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) to characterize function and gray matter volume (GMV) to characterize structure. Based on ALFF and GMV, we calculated functional-structural ratio (FSR) to measure the functional-structural coupling. Significant correlations between GMV atrophy and ALFF changed in the putamen, fusiform gyrus, precuneus, and medial superior frontal gyrus in presbycusis group, and these changes were significantly associated with the increase in PTA and SRT. The FSR reduction in the FFG, precuneus, and medial superior frontal gyrus were also significantly associated with the increase in PTA and SRT. Moreover, it was also significantly correlated with lower scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), as well as the prolonged time in the Trail Making Test (TMT-A). Presbycusis involves coupled structural atrophy and functional decline in auditory and higher-order cognitive regions. Crucially, reduced FSR correlates with both worsening hearing thresholds and cognitive impairment. This highlights FSR as a key neurobiological link between hearing loss and cognitive decline. This research provides a novel basis for early screening and dynamic monitoring of presbycusis-related cognitive impairment.

  • brain reorganization
  • cognitive impairment
  • fMRI
  • presbycusis
  • sMRI

Significance Statement

This study reveals that age-related hearing loss (presbycusis) involves coupled structural atrophy and functional decline in key brain regions like the fusiform gyrus and putamen. We introduce the functional-structural ratio (FSR) as a novel biomarker showing that reduced brain functional-structural coupling correlates with both worsening hearing thresholds and cognitive impairment. This provides the first direct neurobiological evidence linking hearing loss to cognitive decline via shared neural reorganization. FSR offers a potential tool for early screening and monitoring of dementia risk in presbycusis, highlighting that preserving hearing health may protect brain integrity. These findings advance our understanding of how sensory decline drives neurodegeneration.

Introduction

Presbycusis, a common condition in older adults, is characterized by peripheral damage and central brain damage (Uchida et al., 2011). In most instances, presbycusis presents as bilateral hearing loss (HL) accompanied by a decline in speech recognition ability (Lin et al., 2011). According to a 2021 report by the World Health Organization, >65% of individuals aged 60 and above globally experience varying degrees of hearing impairment (World Health Organization, 2021). It is worth noting that HL has been identified as the primary modifiable risk factor for dementia (Livingston et al., 2017). Numerous studies have increasingly linked presbycusis with cognitive impairments in multiple domains (Jafari et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2022). Notably, a regression analysis has demonstrated that hearing thresholds can serve as predictive indicators for executive function deficits in individuals with presbycusis (Viñas-Guasch and Wu, 2017). Another study suggested that age-related HL may be compensated for by recruiting working memory (Rosemann and Thiel, 2020). A recent study combined pure-tone average (PTA) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to evaluate the relationship between auditory and cognitive impairments in presbycusis (Medel et al., 2024). However, the underlying neural mechanisms linking presbycusis and cognitive impairments remain under investigation.

In recent times, there has been a widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technology to examine the pathogenesis of diverse neurological and psychiatric diseases. Gray matter volume (GMV), a metric derived from structural MRI (sMRI), is utilized to quantitatively measure the amount of gray matter in the brain. It is a method of characterizing the number of neurons and qualitatively assessing GMV based on T1-weighted image intensity. A previous study revealed that presbycusis is associated with reduced GMV in the temporal lobe, which correlates with functional impairment (Belkhiria et al., 2020). In another study, this functional impairment was further elucidated as cognitive deterioration, specifically establishing a correlation between reduced GMV in the prefrontal cortex and diminished attention in presbycusis (Ren et al., 2018). A resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) metric called the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) is used to characterize the intensity of spontaneous neural activity within specific brain regions. Presbycusis hearing loss is not only the functional decline of peripheral auditory organs but also involves the reorganization of the central auditory pathway and cross-modal brain networks. ALFF provides a key tool for revealing its neural mechanism. A study has reported that presbycusis exhibits heightened ALFF in the Heschl's gyrus (HG), which demonstrates a positive correlation with Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) scores (Ren et al., 2021). In summary, previous studies have consistently demonstrated reorganization at both the functional and structural levels in presbycusis, respectively, which is closely associated with cognitive impairments.

However, recent studies have revealed an interdependent relationship between functional and structural reorganizations observed in neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, a study investigating cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease reported a correlation between temporal lobe atrophy and enhanced ALFF (Zheng et al., 2022). A recent study utilizing deep learning techniques demonstrated that the integration of sMRI and fMRI data yields superior predictive performance for Alzheimer's disease (Zhou et al., 2018). However, these algorithmic studies primarily focus on disease prediction, while the underlying mechanisms of reorganization within specific brain regions remain elusive. Moreover, there is currently a lack of comprehensive investigations exploring the pathological mechanisms of reorganization by integrating both functional and structural aspects of presbycusis.

Recent advances in multimodal neuroimaging have highlighted the importance of investigating the functional-structural coupling to better understand neural reorganization associated with aging and sensory processing. Traditional coupling analyses such as correlations or regressions between GMV and resting-state functional measures capture global associations but may fail to reveal localized imbalances between functional activity and the underlying structural substrate. To address this limitation, several recent studies have introduced ratio-based coupling indices that quantify functional activity relative to tissue volume, such as the amplitude of ALFF divided by GMV or voxel-based morphometry (VBM) estimates (Zhang et al., 2023; Zhao et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025). These metrics have been interpreted as reflecting the “neural activity demand per unit of gray matter volume” (Zhang et al., 2023), providing a biologically meaningful measure of local functional-structural coupling. Abnormally high or low values of such ratios may indicate functional-structural decoupling, where neural activity is either disproportionate to or constrained by regional structural integrity. Following this rationale, we defined a functional-structural ratio (FSR)—calculated as ALFF divided by GMV—to characterize ROI-wise functional-structural coupling alterations in presbycusis. This approach allows spatially specific assessment of functional-structural relationships and may reveal compensatory or maladaptive reorganizations not captured by traditional correlation-based methods.

To this end, this study aimed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive impairments in presbycusis by combining structural MRI (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT), and Trail Making Test (TMT) were administered to assess cognitive function in patients with presbycusis. To quantify the relationship between regional brain activation and gray matter volume, we applied FSR as a measure of functional-structural coupling. Using this metric, we further examined whether alterations in coupling occur in presbycusis and how these changes relate to cognitive performance. In addition, moderation analysis was conducted to explore the interrelationships among functional-structural coupling, cognitive function, and hearing damage severity.

Materials and Methods

Participants

A total of 110 participants (63 females, 47 males) aged from 50 to 74 years (mean ± standard deviation = 64.27 ± 4.15 years) were enrolled in this study, including 55 presbycusis patients and 55 normal hearing (NH) controls. Each participant was right-handed and a speaker of Mandarin Chinese. Participants with a PTA > 25 decibels hearing level (dB HL) at four frequencies (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) were included in the presbycusis group. The presbycusis group consists of 35 mild HL patients, 19 moderate HL patients, and 1 severe HL patient. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cause of HL other than presbycusis; (2) history of otologic surgery and use of hearing aid; (3) neurological disease; and (4) contraindications for MRI. All participants of this study provided written informed consent.

Auditory and cognitive function test

In a sound-attenuating booth, participants completed an auditory evaluation while remaining vigilant throughout the entire time. A Madsen Electronics Midimate 622 audiometer was used to test the pure-tone thresholds at frequencies ranging from 0.125 to 8 kHz in both ears. The speech reception threshold (SRT; Schlauch et al., 1996) was assessed by the HOPE program (Schlauch et al., 1996) to evaluate speech recognition capabilities. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., 2005) was employed to assess general cognitive function. The AVLT was utilized to evaluate auditory verbal memory performance. Additionally, the Trail Making Test (TMT; Sánchez-Cubillo et al., 2009) is divided into A and B. TMT-A was used to assess executive function, whereas TMT-B was used to assess control capacity.

MRI data acquisition

All MRI data acquisitions were performed on a 3.0 T scanner (Philips, Achieva) using an eight-channel phased-array head coil. The sMRI data were obtained using T1-weighted 3D TFE sequence (TR/TE, 8.1/3.7 ms; thickness, 1 mm; voxel size, 1 × 1 × 1 mm3; field of view, 24 × 24 cm2; turning angle, 8°; 160 slices). The fMRI data were obtained using an echoplanar sequence (TR/TE, 2,000/35 ms; resolution, 3.75 × 3.75 mm2; slice thickness, 4 mm; field of view, 24 × 24 cm2; 35 slices; 240 dynamic), which lasted for 8 min. During the scan, the participants were instructed to lie quietly and keep still, with eyes closed but not asleep or think about anything special. Foam pads and earplugs were used to minimize head movement and reduce noise.

MRI data preprocessing

Structural image preprocessing was conducted utilizing Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM12; Friston, 2007) within the MATLAB environment (MathWorks). This process involved several preprocessing steps. Initially, each image was normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space and subsequently segmented into white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid (Ashburner, 2007). Gray matter volume (GMV) was extracted using a customized DARTEL template, with gray matter data resampled to 1.5 × 1.5 × 1.5 mm3 voxels. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, the images underwent smoothing with a 4 mm Gaussian kernel. A threshold of 0.2 was implemented to mitigate edge effects between white and gray matter (Zhong et al., 2021). Ultimately, voxel-wise GMV data for the entire brain were acquired.

The fMRI data were preprocessed using the Data Processing Assistant for RS-fMRI (DPARSF; Chao-Gan and Yu-Feng, 2010; Yan et al., 2016), following the steps: First, the initial 10 volumes were discarded to ensure a stable magnetic field. The remaining data were corrected for slice-timing differences and head motion (excluding subjects with head motion >3 mm or head rotation >3°). Following this, nuisance signals from white matter and cerebrospinal fluid were regressed out to reduce respiratory and cardiac effects. The denoised functional data were then normalized to MNI space using DARTEL algorithm (Ashburner, 2007), resampled to a resolution of 3 × 3 × 3 mm3, and smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 4 mm FWHM. Additionally, linear trends were removed from the data. Finally, a bandpass filter (0.01–0.1 Hz) was applied to extract low-frequency fluctuations (Zhong et al., 2024).

Demographic and MRI analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS to analyze demographic information, auditory, and cognitive scale scores. The gender ratio was assessed using a chi-square test, while other comparisons were conducted using two-tailed two-sample t tests. Differences between groups were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Intergroup differences in ALFF and GMV between the presbycusis and NH groups were analyzed using two-sided two-sample t tests, with gender, age, and education level as covariates in all models. For GMV analyses, total intracranial volume (TIV) was additionally included as a covariate to account for variations in brain size. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied after adjusting for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate (FDR) method.

Functional-structural coupling analysis

Initially, regions of interest (ROIs) were defined as the brain areas exhibiting covariant changes in both ALFF and GMV analyses. Within these ROIs, a partial correlation analysis was conducted to examine the direct relationship between ALFF and GMV, while controlling for age, gender, and education level (FDR, p < 0.05). To quantify functional-structural coupling, FSR was calculated for each participant by dividing the mean ALFF signal by the mean GMV (Cui et al., 2022). Subsequently, we compared the differentiation of FSR between the presbycusis and NH groups by two-tailed two-sample t tests (Bonferroni, p < 0.01). Finally, partial correlation analysis was conducted to explore the association between FSR and clinical variables in presbycusis group, which controlled for gender, age, and education level (p < 0.05).

Results

Demographic data

Table 1 illustrates all participants’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Age, gender, and educational attainment are not significantly different between the presbycusis and NH groups (p > 0.05). The PTA and SRT of the presbycusis group were significantly greater than those of the NH group (p < 0.001). All results on the cognitive evaluation scales showed significant group differences (p < 0.001). According to clinical standards, the presbycusis group consists of 19 presbycusis patients with normal cognition and 36 presbycusis patients with dementia (26 of whom have mild cognitive impairment).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Participants’ demographic and clinical data

Group differences in GMV and ALFF

Figure 1 and Table 2 illustrate the group differences in ALFF for presbycusis and NH control. The bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and supplementary motor area (SMA) all showed reduced ALFF in presbycusis when compared with the NH controls. In addition, presbycusis exhibited reduced ALFF in the right lingual gyrus, precuneus, left fusiform gyrus (FFG), middle cingulate cortex (MCC), medial superior frontal gyrus (med-SFG), putamen, and middle occipital gyrus. However, presbycusis exhibited increased ALFF in the right inferior temporal gyrus (ITG), the left calcarine, and the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Visualization of intergroup differences in ALFF. Results were obtained by a two-tailed two-sample t test. FDR corrected p < 0.05, cluster size >20 voxels. L, left; R, right.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

The difference brain region of ALFF between presbycusis and normal hearing groups

Figure 2 and Table 3 illustrate the group differences in GMV for presbycusis and NH control. The bilateral superior temporal gyrus, superior temporal pole, MCC, insula, HG, FFG, and SMA all showed reduced GMV in the presbycusis when compared with the NH controls. In addition, presbycusis exhibited reduced GMV in the right middle temporal gyrus, hippocampus, calcarine, precuneus, left putamen, med-SFG, and inferior parietal lobule.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Visualization of intergroup differences in GMV. Results were obtained by a two-tailed two-sample t test. FDR corrected p < 0.05, cluster size >50 voxels. L, left; R, right.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

The difference brain region of GMV between presbycusis and normal hearing groups

Correlation between ALFF and GMV in covariant regions

The correlation between ALFF and GMV in the same brain region of the presbycusis group is illustrated in Table 4. A significant negative correlation was observed between ALFF and GMV in the left SFG (r = −0.320, p = 0.006), as well as in the right precuneus (r = −0.295, p = 0.009). Additionally, a significant positive correlation was found between ALFF and GMV in the left FFG (r = 0.280, p = 0.010) and left putamen (r = 0.321, p = 0.006). However, these significant correlations were not present in the NH group.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

The correlation between ALFF and GMV in covariant areas of the presbycusis group

Functional-structural coupling analysis

Figure 3 shows the statistical difference in FSR between the presbycusis and NH groups. Significant intergroup differences in FSR were found in the left FFG, med-SFG, precuneus, and right putamen. Specifically, the left med-SFG, putamen, FFG, and right precuneus all showed reduced FSR in the presbycusis when compared with the NH controls. The correlation between FSR and clinical variables in the presbycusis group is illustrated in Figure 4. In the right putamen, there was a significant negative correlation between FSR and PTA (r = −0.274, p = 0.012), as well as SRT (r = −0.320, p = 0.003). Similarly, in the left FFG, there were negative correlations observed with SRT (r = −0.224, p = 0.042) and AVLT (r = −0.299, p = 0.006). On the other hand, a positive correlation was found between FSR in the right precuneus and MoCA scores (r = 0.221, p = 0.044). Lastly, a negative correlation was observed between FSR in the right med-SFG and TMT-A performance (r = −0.248, p = 0.024).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Statistical differences chart of the FSR between presbycusis and NH groups. * represents Bonferroni’s correction, p < 0.01. FSR, functional-structural ratio; med-SFG, medial superior frontal gyrus; FFG, fusiform gyrus.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

A–F, Correlations between the FSR and behavioral score in the presbycusis. FSR, functional-structural ratio; PTA, pure tone average; SRT, speech reception threshold; MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; AVLT, Auditory Verbal Learning Test.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first study to examine regional functional-structural coupling (FSR = ALFF/GMV) in presbycusis by integrating sMRI and fMRI. We observed widespread GMV reductions accompanied by regionally heterogeneous changes in ALFF. Importantly, GMV and ALFF alterations overlapped in the putamen, FFG, precuneus, and med-SFG. In presbycusis, the putamen and FFG exhibited synchronous reductions in both ALFF and GMV. The precuneus and med-SFG showed increased ALFF alongside GMV loss. Lower FSR in the putamen correlated with worse hearing loss and speech recognition, while reduced FSR in the FFG was linked to worse speech recognition. We also observed region-specific FSR reductions were related to clinical and cognitive measures: lower FSR in the FFG was linked to poorer AVLT performance, consistent with a role for functional-structural alterations in verbal episodic memory decline; reduced FSR in med-SFG was associated with poorer performance on the TMT-A, which we interpret as indicative of altered executive function; and lower FSR in the precuneus correlated with reduced total MoCA scores, reflecting poorer general cognitive functioning.

We observed widespread cortical atrophy in presbycusis, together with regional alterations in spontaneous neural activity—some regions showed increases while others showed decreases. Prior studies have reported similar patterns of atrophy in regions such as the HG, STG, precuneus, and SMA (Ren et al., 2018) and mixed ALFF alterations in presbycusis (Chen et al., 2018), which have been interpreted as simultaneous disruption and compensation responses (Tarawneh et al., 2022). In our covariant regions, ALFF and GMV were significantly correlated, suggesting partial interdependence of structural and functional alterations in presbycusis. Consistent with our findings, a previous study has reported correlations between ALFF and GMV within the posterior cingulate cortex in mild cognitive impairment patients (Z-L. Zhao et al., 2015). It is also consistent with a large-scale finding of concurrent hippocampal volume reduction and decreased hippocampus-HG functional connectivity in presbycusis (Fitzhugh and Pa, 2022). Notably, the regional specificity of ALFF and GMV alterations observed in our study may indicate a nonlinear relationship between functional and structural damage. This notion resonates with staged models of disease progression—early reversible fluctuations, compensatory changes, mid-late decompensation, and late structural decline (Lou et al., 2016; Li et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). While evidence suggests functional and structural remodeling in sensorineural hearing loss may follow different stages (Uchida et al., 2011), their precise interplay requires further clarification through animal and longitudinal studies. Our findings are consistent with the sensory deprivation hypothesis, wherein partial auditory deprivation precipitates cortical functional decline and subsequent cognitive deficits. However, we cannot rule out that preexisting brain changes or cognitive impairment contribute to the observed ALFF and GMV alterations, as clinical investigations have not addressed the causal link between auditory deprivation in presbycusis and cognitive decline.

Our study revealed that presbycusis exhibits reduced ALFF and GMV atrophy in the left putamen. The putamen is structurally interconnected with the thalamus and is believed to play a crucial role in language processing (Viñas-Guasch and Wu, 2017). In line with our findings, previous study has reported reduced ALFF in the putamen within the slow-4 frequency band in presbycusis (Ren et al., 2021), while another study reported putamen atrophy in patients with sensorineural HL (Qu et al., 2020). Notably, we observed disrupted functional-structural coupling in the left putamen in presbycusis, which was correlated with hearing loss and speech recognition proficiency. The left putamen contributes to speech comprehension (Abutalebi et al., 2013), and its neurons encode auditory information (Z. Zhao et al., 2015). Taken together, these findings suggest putamen reorganization after auditory deprivation may impair auditory encoding and contribute to reduced speech recognition in presbycusis.

Impairments in functional-structural coupling in the FFG were associated with diminished speech recognition proficiency in presbycusis. The FFG, located in the lateral temporal lobe, contributes to recognition processes and provides top-down feedback important for speaker recognition (Rhone et al., 2023). We also found that the altered coupling in the FFG is associated with poorer learning and memory in presbycusis. Although a direct link between FFG impairment and memory ability remains unestablished, previous research has revealed a distinct association between working memory and activation in the FFG (Owens et al., 2018). Given the crucial role of the FFG in audiovisual speech processing (McNorgan and Booth, 2015), altered coupling may reflect changes in audiovisual integration. Audiovisual information can interfere with each other during brain processing, thereby impacting working memory (He et al., 2023). Supporting this, several studies report enhanced information transfer from the FFG to other GM regions and increased audiovisual integration abilities in presbycusis (Schulte et al., 2020; Rosemann et al., 2021; Chavant and Kapoula, 2022). Consistent with this view, a recent study reported a unique association between spontaneous neural activity on the FFG and the duration of HL in sensorineural hearing loss patients (Li et al., 2023). Collectively, these observations suggest that the FFG may participate in an audiovisual compensatory process in presbycusis that is modulated by the chronicity of hearing loss.

We also found that impaired functional-structural coupling in the precuneus was present in presbycusis and was associated with general cognitive impairments. The precuneus is connected to the STG via the middle longitudinal fasciculus and is involved in the integration of auditory information (Tanglay et al., 2022). It is also implicated in various cognitive processes, including self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and spatial information processing (Ponticorvo et al., 2021; Dadario and Sughrue, 2023). In addition, presbycusis was linked to disrupted functional-structural coupling in the med-SFG, and weaker coupling in this region correlated with poorer executive performance. The med-SFG is structurally connected to the anterior cingulate cortex and involved in auditory spatial processing (Tao et al., 2015). The present study revealed a significant association between deactivation in the med-SFG and impaired executive function, which holds true in children, adolescents, and adults (Müller et al., 2021). It is noteworthy that both the precuneus and the med-SFG serve as pivotal nodes within the default mode network (DMN). Previous studies have reported atrophy of internal nodes within DMN and reduced functional connectivity in presbycusis (Ren et al., 2018; Xing et al., 2020). Together, these results indicate that partial auditory deprivation in presbycusis is accompanied by DMN reorganization, which may contribute to declines in multiple cognitive domains.

This study found that presbycusis exhibits a functional-structural coupling relationship in the FFG, med-SFG, putamen, and precuneus. The auditory deprivation hypothesis proposes a causal relationship between auditory impairment and changes in brain structure caused by auditory deprivation (Slade et al., 2020). The sensory deprivation hypothesis explains the compensatory reorganization of cortical function and the cognitive regulation of presbycusis. Furthermore, a study has hypothesized that brain functional reorganization may occur earlier than structure (De Micco et al., 2021). This study found a possible association between brain structure and function, despite the lack of clinical evidence to support a causal relationship between the two. In addition, presbycusis exhibits a relationship between functional-structural coupling and cognitive impairments, which provides a new supplement to the hypothesis of sensory deprivation.

There are several limitations to this study that need to be noted. First, because this study adopted a cross-sectional design, the observed associations between structural and functional alterations in presbycusis do not establish causality or temporal order. It remains unclear whether hearing loss leads to neural and cognitive changes or whether preexisting brain alterations contribute to auditory dysfunction. Residual confounding and reverse causation therefore cannot be excluded, and longitudinal or interventional studies will be needed to clarify the direction of these effects. Second, it is also constructive to carry out an intergroup difference study after first establishing the relationship between structure and functionality. Future studies can try to actualize this ideal at the structural and functional network levels. Third, due to the limited sample size, subgrouping participants based on their cognitive abilities was not performed. Therefore, the altered function and structure observed in presbycusis may also be attributed to cognitive impairment. In the future, it is necessary to expand the sample size for subgroup analysis to further clarify which functional reorganizations in presbycusis are caused by hearing impairment. Finally, while FSR highlighted region-specific decoupling in our sample, we emphasize that other coupling metrics (regression, covariance, canonical correlation, joint ICA, etc.) may reveal complementary aspects of structure–function relationships. Ratio measures can be sensitive to measurement noise and scaling differences; therefore, independent-cohort replication and method comparison are essential. We plan to validate FSR findings using (1) regression-based modeling (ALFF ∼ GMV + covariates), (2) multivariate fusion methods (e.g., joint ICA/linked ICA), and (3) replication in larger/independent datasets.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that functional and structural reorganization occurs in presbycusis, with these two aspects being mutually dependent. Notably, impaired speech recognition in presbycusis is correlated with reorganization in specific brain regions (putamen, FFG), which may be primarily established through hearing loss. Furthermore, the association between FFG damage and memory ability implies a reshaping of audiovisual integration in presbycusis. Additionally, our study reveals that presbycusis exhibits functional and structural changes in DMN nodes, which are linked to cognitive impairments across multiple domains.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61701342, 81601479), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Joint Fund (no. 25JCLMJC00360), Taishan Scholars Project of Shandong Province (no. tstp2024), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (no. 19JCQNJC13100), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. ZR2024MH018).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abutalebi J,
    2. Della Rosa PA,
    3. Gonzaga AKC,
    4. Keim R,
    5. Costa A,
    6. Perani D
    (2013) The role of the left putamen in multilingual language production. Brain Lang 125:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.03.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ashburner J
    (2007) A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38:95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Belkhiria C,
    2. Vergara RC,
    3. San Martin S,
    4. Leiva A,
    5. Martinez M,
    6. Marcenaro B,
    7. Andrade M,
    8. Delano PH,
    9. Delgado C
    (2020) Insula and amygdala atrophy are associated with functional impairment in subjects with presbycusis. Front Aging Neurosci 12:102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00102
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chao-Gan Y,
    2. Yu-Feng Z
    (2010) DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci 4:13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2010.00013
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chavant M,
    2. Kapoula Z
    (2022) Audiovisual integration for saccade and vergence eye movements increases with presbycusis and loss of selective attention on the Stroop test. Brain Sci 12:591. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050591
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chen Y-C,
    2. Chen H,
    3. Jiang L,
    4. Bo F,
    5. Xu J-J,
    6. Mao C-N,
    7. Salvi R,
    8. Yin X,
    9. Lu G,
    10. Gu J-P
    (2018) Presbycusis disrupts spontaneous activity revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Front Behav Neurosci 12:44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cui Q,
    2. Tang Q,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Sheng W,
    5. Yang Y,
    6. Li D,
    7. Deng J,
    8. Wang Y,
    9. Lu F,
    10. Chen H
    (2022) Loss of superiority illusion in bipolar depressive disorder: a combined functional and structural MRI study. J Psychiatr Res 151:391–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.034
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dadario NB,
    2. Sughrue ME
    (2023) The functional role of the precuneus. Brain 146:3598–3607. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awad181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. De Micco R,
    2. Agosta F,
    3. Basaia S,
    4. Siciliano M,
    5. Cividini C,
    6. Tedeschi G,
    7. Filippi M,
    8. Tessitore A
    (2021) Functional connectomics and disease progression in drug-naïve Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov Disord 36:1603–1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28541
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fitzhugh MC,
    2. Pa J
    (2022) Longitudinal changes in resting-state functional connectivity and gray matter volume are associated with conversion to hearing impairment in older adults. J Alzheimers Dis 86:905–918. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-215288
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Friston KJ
    (2007) Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis of functional brain images, Ed 1. Amsterdam Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.
  12. ↵
    1. He Y, et al.
    (2023) Effects of audiovisual interactions on working memory: use of the combined N-back+Go/NoGo paradigm. Front Psychol 14:1080788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1080788
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Jafari Z,
    2. Kolb BE,
    3. Mohajerani MH
    (2019) Age-related hearing loss and tinnitus, dementia risk, and auditory amplification outcomes. Ageing Res Rev 56:100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2019.100963
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Yu X,
    3. Zou Y,
    4. Leng Y,
    5. Yang F,
    6. Liu B,
    7. Fan W
    (2023) Altered static and dynamic intrinsic brain activity in unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Front Neurosci 17:1257729. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1257729
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Li Y, et al.
    (2021) Reversible GABAergic dysfunction involved in hippocampal hyperactivity predicts early-stage Alzheimer disease in a mouse model. Alzheimers Res Ther 13:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00859-8
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lin FR,
    2. Thorpe R,
    3. Gordon-Salant S,
    4. Ferrucci L
    (2011) Hearing loss prevalence and risk factors among older adults in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66A:582–590. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glr002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Liu T,
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Ai J,
    4. Chen D,
    5. Wu J,
    6. Fang B,
    7. Yan T
    (2021) Disrupted rich-club organization of brain structural networks in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Struct Funct 226:2205–2217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-021-02319-3
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Livingston G, et al.
    (2017) Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet 390:2673–2734. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lou W,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Wong A,
    4. Chu WCW,
    5. Mok VCT,
    6. Wang D
    (2016) Changes of cerebral perfusion and functional brain network organization in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 54:397–409. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160201
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. McNorgan C,
    2. Booth JR
    (2015) Skill dependent audiovisual integration in the fusiform induces repetition suppression. Brain Lang 141:110–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.12.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Medel V, et al.
    (2024) Cochlear dysfunction as an early biomarker of cognitive decline in normal hearing and mild hearing loss. Alzheimers Dement 16:e12467. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12467
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Müller NCJ,
    2. Kohn N,
    3. van Buuren M,
    4. Klijn N,
    5. Emmen H,
    6. Berkers RMWJ,
    7. Dresler M,
    8. Janzen G,
    9. Fernández G
    (2021) Differences in executive abilities rather than associative processes contribute to memory development. Hum Brain Mapp 42:6000–6013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25665
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Nasreddine ZS,
    2. Phillips NA,
    3. Bédirian V,
    4. Charbonneau S,
    5. Whitehead V,
    6. Collin I,
    7. Cummings JL,
    8. Chertkow H
    (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Owens MM,
    2. Duda B,
    3. Sweet LH,
    4. MacKillop J
    (2018) Distinct functional and structural neural underpinnings of working memory. Neuroimage 174:463–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ponticorvo S, et al.
    (2021) Long-range auditory functional connectivity in hearing loss and rehabilitation. Brain Connect 11:483–492. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2020.0814
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Qu H,
    2. Tang H,
    3. Pan J,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Wang W
    (2020) Alteration of cortical and subcortical structures in children with profound sensorineural hearing loss. Front Hum Neurosci 14:565445. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.565445
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Ren F,
    2. Ma W,
    3. Li M,
    4. Sun H,
    5. Xin Q,
    6. Zong W,
    7. Chen W,
    8. Wang G,
    9. Gao F,
    10. Zhao B
    (2018) Gray matter atrophy is associated with cognitive impairment in patients with presbycusis: a comprehensive morphometric study. Front Neurosci 12:744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00744
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ren F,
    2. Ma W,
    3. Zong W,
    4. Li N,
    5. Li X,
    6. Li F,
    7. Wu L,
    8. Li H,
    9. Li M,
    10. Gao F
    (2021) Brain frequency-specific changes in the spontaneous neural activity are associated with cognitive impairment in patients with presbycusis. Front Aging Neurosci 13:649874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.649874
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Rhone AE,
    2. Rupp K,
    3. Hect JL,
    4. Harford E,
    5. Tranel D,
    6. Howard MA,
    7. Abel TJ
    (2023) Electrocorticography reveals the dynamics of famous voice responses in human fusiform gyrus. J Neurophysiol 129:342–346. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00459.2022
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Rosemann S,
    2. Gieseler A,
    3. Tahden M,
    4. Colonius H,
    5. Thiel CM
    (2021) Treatment of age-related hearing loss alters audiovisual integration and resting-state functional connectivity: a randomized controlled pilot trial. eNeuro 8:ENEURO.0258-21.2021. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0258-21.2021
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Rosemann S,
    2. Thiel CM
    (2020) Neural signatures of working memory in age-related hearing loss. Neuroscience 429:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.12.046
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Sánchez-Cubillo I,
    2. Periáñez JA,
    3. Adrover-Roig D,
    4. Rodríguez-Sánchez JM,
    5. Ríos-Lago M,
    6. Tirapu J,
    7. Barceló F
    (2009) Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 15:438–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090626
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Schlauch RS,
    2. Arnce KD,
    3. Olson LM,
    4. Sanchez S,
    5. Doyle TN
    (1996) Identification of pseudohypacusis using speech recognition thresholds. Ear Hear 17:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199606000-00006
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Schulte A,
    2. Thiel CM,
    3. Gieseler A,
    4. Tahden M,
    5. Colonius H,
    6. Rosemann S
    (2020) Reduced resting state functional connectivity with increasing age-related hearing loss and McGurk susceptibility. Sci Rep 10:16987. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74012-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Slade K,
    2. Plack CJ,
    3. Nuttall HE
    (2020) The effects of age-related hearing loss on the brain and cognitive function. Trends Neurosci 43:810–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2020.07.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Tanglay O,
    2. Young IM,
    3. Dadario NB,
    4. Briggs RG,
    5. Fonseka RD,
    6. Dhanaraj V,
    7. Hormovas J,
    8. Lin Y-H,
    9. Sughrue ME
    (2022) Anatomy and white-matter connections of the precuneus. Brain Imaging Behav 16:574–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-021-00529-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Tao Q,
    2. Chan CCH,
    3. Luo Y,
    4. Li J,
    5. Ting K,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Lee TMC
    (2015) How does experience modulate auditory spatial processing in individuals with blindness? Brain Topogr 28:506–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-013-0339-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Tarawneh HY,
    2. Jayakody DMP,
    3. Sohrabi HR,
    4. Martins RN,
    5. Mulders WHAM
    (2022) Understanding the relationship between age-related hearing loss and Alzheimer’s disease: a narrative review. J Alzheimers Dis Rep 6:539–556. https://doi.org/10.3233/ADR-220035
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Uchida Y,
    2. Sugiura S,
    3. Ando F,
    4. Nakashima T,
    5. Shimokata H
    (2011) Molecular genetic epidemiology of age-related hearing impairment. Auris Nasus Larynx 38:657–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2011.02.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Viñas-Guasch N,
    2. Wu YJ
    (2017) The role of the putamen in language: a meta-analytic connectivity modeling study. Brain Struct Funct 222:3991–4004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-017-1450-y
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Wang N, et al.
    (2025) Disrupted brain structure–function coupling and its mediating effects on the associations between cerebral small vessel disease burden and cognitive dysfunction. CNS Neurosci Ther 31:e70604. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.70604
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Wang Y, et al.
    (2022) High-frequency cochlear amplifier dysfunction: a dominating contribution to the cognitive-ear link. Front Aging Neurosci 13:767570. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.767570
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    World Health Organization (2021) World report on hearing, Ed 1. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  44. ↵
    1. Xing C,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Cui J,
    4. Yong W,
    5. Hu J,
    6. Yin X,
    7. Wu Y,
    8. Chen Y-C
    (2020) Disrupted functional network connectivity predicts cognitive impairment in presbycusis patients. Front Aging Neurosci 12:246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00246
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Yan C-G,
    2. Wang X-D,
    3. Zuo X-N,
    4. Zang Y-F
    (2016) DPABI: data processing & analysis for (resting-state) brain imaging. Neuroinformatics 14:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Liang C,
    3. Wang N,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Gao Y,
    6. Sui C,
    7. Xin H,
    8. Feng M,
    9. Guo L,
    10. Wen H
    (2023) Abnormal whole-brain voxelwise structure-function coupling and its association with cognitive dysfunction in patients with different cerebral small vessel disease burdens. Front Aging Neurosci 15:1148738. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1148738
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Zhao R,
    2. Wang P,
    3. Liu L,
    4. Zhang F,
    5. Hu P,
    6. Wen J,
    7. Li H,
    8. Biswal BB
    (2023) Whole-brain structure–function coupling abnormalities in mild cognitive impairment: a study combining amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations and voxel-based morphometry. Front Neurosci 17:1236221. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1236221
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Zhao Z-L,
    2. Fan F-M,
    3. Lu J,
    4. Li H-J,
    5. Jia L-F,
    6. Han Y,
    7. Li K-C
    (2015) Changes of gray matter volume and amplitude of low-frequency oscillations in amnestic MCI: an integrative multi-modal MRI study. Acta Radiol 56:614–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185114533329
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Zhao Z,
    2. Sato Y,
    3. Qin L
    (2015) Response properties of neurons in the cat’s putamen during auditory discrimination. Behav Brain Res 292:448–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Zheng JH,
    2. Sun WH,
    3. Ma JJ,
    4. Wang ZD,
    5. Chang QQ,
    6. Dong LR,
    7. Shi XX,
    8. Li MJ,
    9. Gu Q,
    10. Chen SY
    (2022) Structural and functional abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease based on voxel-based morphometry and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Lett 788:136835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Zhong Z,
    2. Deng F,
    3. Ren H
    (2021) Neurostructural correlates of work-related risk propensity (WRP): the PCC gray matter volume mediates the impact of extraversion on WRP. Pers Individ Dif 177:110820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110820
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Zhong Z,
    2. Ren H,
    3. Wang S
    (2024) How do regulatory focus and the big five relate to work-domain risk-taking? Evidence from resting-state fMRI. J Bus Psychol 39:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09925-4
    OpenUrl
  53. ↵
    1. Zhou T,
    2. Thung K,
    3. Zhu X,
    4. Shen D
    (2018) Effective feature learning and fusion of multimodality data using stage-wise deep neural network for dementia diagnosis. Hum Brain Mapp 40:1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24428
    OpenUrlPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Luke Remage-Healey, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Lane Krejcova.

SYNTHESIS:

Two expert reviewers evaluated the manuscript and found that it was innovative and clinically relevant, introducing a potentially useful biomarker of structure-function coupling in presbycusis. That said, they raised several important concerns below that need to be addressed in order to proceed with an evaluation.

REVIEWER COMMENTS:

The manuscript investigates the relationship between presbycusis and cognitive decline through combined structural and functional MRI approaches, introducing the functional-structural ratio (FSR) as a novel biomarker. It is well designed and provides impactful insights into the neurobiological mechanisms linking hearing loss and cognitive decline. The FSR captures the coupling between gray matter volume and spontaneous neural activity. Results show that reduced FSR in the fusiform gyrus, putamen, precuneus, and medial superior frontal gyrus correlates with both worse hearing thresholds and poorer cognitive performance.

POINTS TO BE ADDRESSED

1. It would be important to clarify in the discussion that causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design.

2. Consider expanding the sample size or performing subgroup analysis for future work to disentangle the relative contributions of hearing impairment vs cognitive decline. The presbycusis group includes individuals with normal cognition, MCI, and dementia. Without subgroup analyses, it is difficult to determine whether findings are driven by hearing loss itself or by underlying neurodegeneration. Stratified analyses or at least sensitivity checks would add clarity.

3. Develop a visual abstract that integrates structural and functional findings with cognitive results for clarity.

4. FSR is defined as ALFF/GMV, but the rationale for this ratio as a biologically meaningful measure of coupling requires further justification. Why this metric over alternative coupling approaches (e.g., regression or covariance analyses)? Validation in an independent cohort or at least comparison to other metrics would strengthen confidence.

5. The fMRI scan duration was only ~2 minutes, which is relatively short for reliable ALFF estimation. This limitation should be explicitly acknowledged, and its implications for reproducibility discussed.

6. The use of primarily screening-level measures (MoCA, AVLT, TMT) limits the resolution of domain-specific inferences. The authors should interpret claims about executive function, memory, and general cognition with appropriate caution.

Author Response

Response to decision:

1. It would be important to clarify in the discussion that causality cannot be inferred due to the cross-sectional design.

Thank you for highlighting the issue of causal inference. We have revised the Limitations paragraph in the Discussion to explicitly state that, because this is a cross-sectional study, our findings do not establish causality or temporal order. We now note that it is unclear whether hearing loss causes neural and cognitive changes or whether preexisting brain alterations contribute to auditory dysfunction, and that residual confounding and reverse causation cannot be excluded. We also state that longitudinal and interventional studies are needed to clarify the directionality of these effects. (See Discussion, Limitations paragraph.) 2. Consider expanding the sample size or performing subgroup analysis for future work to disentangle the relative contributions of hearing impairment vs cognitive decline. The presbycusis group includes individuals with normal cognition, MCI, and dementia. Without subgroup analyses, it is difficult to determine whether findings are driven by hearing loss itself or by underlying neurodegeneration. Stratified analyses or at least sensitivity checks would add clarity.

Thank you for this important comment. We agree that subgroup analyses could help disentangle the relative contributions of hearing impairment and cognitive decline. As noted in the manuscript (Discussion, Limitations), "Lastly, due to the limited sample size, subgrouping participants based on their cognitive abilities was not performed. Therefore, the altered function and structure observed in presbycusis may also be attributed to cognitive impairment. In the future, it is necessary to expand the sample size for subgroup analysis to further clarify which functional reorganizations in presbycusis are caused by hearing impairment.". To clarify for the Reviewer, the presbycusis group in the present sample comprises dementia : MCI : cognitively normal = 10 : 26 : 19. These subgroup sizes are small and accordingly underpowered for stratified statistical comparisons; performing and reporting such subgroup tests at this stage would risk producing unreliable or misleading results. For this reason, we did not conduct formal subgroup analyses in the current revision. We have therefore interpreted our results at the group level and explicitly acknowledged this limitation in the manuscript. We plan to recruit larger samples and collect longitudinal and interventional data in future studies to enable adequately powered subgroup and interaction analyses that can more robustly disentangle hearing-related vs. neurodegeneration-related effects.

3. Develop a visual abstract that integrates structural and functional findings with cognitive results for clarity.

Thank you for the suggestion. We have developed a visual abstract that integrates clinical measures (hearing and cognition), imaging findings (ALFF and GMV), and the FSR results with arrows illustrating the principal associations.

4. FSR is defined as ALFF/GMV, but the rationale for this ratio as a biologically meaningful measure of coupling requires further justification. Why this metric over alternative coupling approaches (e.g., regression or covariance analyses)? Validation in an independent cohort or at least comparison to other metrics would strengthen confidence.

Thank you for raising this important methodological point. In response, we have strengthened the manuscript in two ways. First, we added a paragraph to the Introduction that motivates the use of ratio-based coupling indices (e.g., ALFF/GMV), cites recent relevant work, and explains the conceptual interpretation of such measures as "neural activity demand per unit gray-matter volume." Second, we explicitly acknowledged the limitations of ratio metrics in the Discussion and committed to future method comparisons and validation: we will compare FSR with regression/covariance and multivariate fusion approaches (e.g., joint/linked ICA or canonical correlation) and attempt independent-cohort replication. These additions should clarify the rationale, implementation, and limitations of the FSR metric. (See Introduction and Discussion.) 5. The fMRI scan duration was only ~2 minutes, which is relatively short for reliable ALFF estimation. This limitation should be explicitly acknowledged, and its implications for reproducibility discussed.

Thank you for the comment. We discovered that the "~2 minutes" statement in the original manuscript was a typographical error. The resting-state fMRI acquisition was in fact 8 minutes (TR = 2 s; 240 volumes; total duration = 480 s). We have corrected this in the Methods.

6. The use of primarily screening-level measures (MoCA, AVLT, TMT) limits the resolution of domain-specific inferences. The authors should interpret claims about executive function, memory, and general cognition with appropriate caution.

We agree with the Reviewer. We have revised the Discussion to first report FSR associations at the measurement level and then cautiously infer links to broader cognitive domains. This change clarifies that our claims are based on test-score associations and avoids implying direct, mechanistic relationships between imaging markers and specific cognitive subcomponents.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 13 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 13, Issue 3
March 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
Xiaojie Li, Weilong Fu, Yao Wang, Yuting Gao, Jinhai Wang, Jing Yang, Longji Xu, Fei Gao, Xiao Li, Ning Li
eNeuro 16 February 2026, 13 (3) ENEURO.0294-25.2026; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0294-25.2026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
Xiaojie Li, Weilong Fu, Yao Wang, Yuting Gao, Jinhai Wang, Jing Yang, Longji Xu, Fei Gao, Xiao Li, Ning Li
eNeuro 16 February 2026, 13 (3) ENEURO.0294-25.2026; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0294-25.2026
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Visual Abstract
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • brain reorganization
  • cognitive impairment
  • fMRI
  • presbycusis
  • sMRI

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.