Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Development

sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a

Dylan Barber, Casandra Salinas-Salinas, Samah Houmam, Kriti Shukla and Heather C. Rice
eNeuro 3 February 2026, 13 (2) ENEURO.0345-25.2026; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0345-25.2026
Dylan Barber
1Aging & Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
2Neuroscience Program, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Casandra Salinas-Salinas
1Aging & Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samah Houmam
1Aging & Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
3Center for Geroscience and Healthy Brain Aging, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
4Department of Biochemistry & Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kriti Shukla
1Aging & Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
5Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather C. Rice
1Aging & Metabolism Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
2Neuroscience Program, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
3Center for Geroscience and Healthy Brain Aging, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
4Department of Biochemistry & Physiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Heather C. Rice
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Neurite outgrowth is essential for neural circuit formation and is tightly regulated by secreted factors and their receptors. The secreted extracellular domain of the amyloid precursor protein (sAPPα) has been shown to modulate neurite outgrowth. Recently, the gamma amino butyric acid receptor type-B subunit 1a (GABABR1a) was identified as an sAPPα binding partner that mediates its effects on synaptic transmission. Here, we investigated whether this interaction also regulates neurite outgrowth. In mouse primary hippocampal neurons of either sex, the GABABR agonist baclofen reduced axon length; whereas its antagonist CGP54626 increased axon length in primary hippocampal neurons. Moreover, GABABR1a knock-out increased axon length and abolished the effect of baclofen. Application of sAPPα reduced axon length, an effect that required the presence of both GABABR1a and the extension domain of sAPPα, which mediates its binding to GABABR1a. Similarly, the APP 17mer peptide, which is sufficient to bind GABABR1a and mimic the effects of sAPP on synaptic transmission, reduced axon outgrowth in wild-type but not in GABABR1a-deficient neurons. Together, these findings indicate that the 1a isoform contributes to GABABR-dependent suppression of neurite outgrowth and mediates the inhibitory effect of sAPPα on neurite outgrowth.

  • amyloid precursor protein
  • GABA receptor
  • mouse primary neurons
  • neurite outgrowth

Significance Statement

Amyloid precursor protein (APP) plays a central role in Alzheimer's disease, yet its normal functions are not fully understood. In this study, we uncover a previously unrecognized role of the GABA B Receptor in mediating the inhibitory effects of sAPPα on neurite outgrowth. These findings provide mechanistic insight into how disruptions in APP signaling could influence both normal brain development and pathological processes in neurodevelopmental disorders and Alzheimer's disease.

Introduction

Neurite outgrowth, the process by which neurons extend their axons and dendrites, is essential for establishing neural circuity in the brain. This developmental process is tightly regulated by secreted factors and their receptors. APP is a type I transmembrane protein that undergoes sequential proteolytic processing to generate several fragments, most notably the amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptide which accumulates in Alzheimer's disease (AD; Glenner and Wong, 1984). APP processing also leads to the secretion of other physiologically relevant fragments besides Aβ. The initial cleavage of APP by either α-, β-, or η-secretase releases a large extracellular fragment termed secreted APP (sAPPα, sAPPβ, or sAPPη, respectively; Hefter et al., 2020). During early development, APP expression rises (Hung et al., 1992; Kirazov et al., 2001) and contributes to neurodevelopmental processes such as neurite outgrowth (Nicolas and Hassan, 2014; Chau et al., 2023). Decades of research have shown that primary neurons cultured from APP knock-out mice exhibit enhanced neurite outgrowth (Perez et al., 1997; Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2021) and also indicates that sAPPα is an important fragment in mediating this function of APP in neurite outgrowth (Milward et al., 1992; Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Chasseigneaux et al., 2011; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Hasebe et al., 2013; Dorard et al., 2018).

sAPPα interacts with the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type B (GABABR; Schwenk et al., 2016; Dinamarca et al., 2019; Rice et al., 2019; Rem et al., 2023), a metabotropic receptor for the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. GABABR is an obligate heterodimer composed of two subunits. Subunit 1 binds GABA; subunit 2 couples intracellularly to Guanine nucleotide-binding (G) proteins (Pin and Bettler, 2016). Subunit 1 exists in two main isoforms, with the 1a isoform containing two additional N-terminal sushi domains that are absent in the 1b isoform (Pin and Bettler, 2016). The extension domain (ExD) within the extracellular region of APP was found to bind specifically to the first sushi domain of the 1a isoform (GABABR1a; Rice et al., 2019). GABABR1a was shown to mediate effects of sAPPα on synaptic transmission, and a synthetic 17 amino acid peptide within the ExD of sAPPα (APP 17mer) was sufficient to bind GABABR1a and mimic these effects (Rice et al., 2019). However, whether GABABR1a also mediates other functions of sAPPα is not yet known.

The protein expression of both GABABR and APP rise during the first few weeks of rodent development (Hung et al., 1992; Fritschy et al., 1999; Kirazov et al., 2001; Schwenk et al., 2016; Khoshdel-Sarkarizi et al., 2019). Moreover, both APP and GABABR have been implicated independently in the regulation of similar neurodevelopmental processes, including neurogenesis (Ma et al., 2008; Demars et al., 2011; Giachino et al., 2014), neuronal migration (Young-Pearse et al., 2007; Rice et al., 2012; Bony et al., 2013; Callahan et al., 2017), synaptogenesis (Meier et al., 2008; Fiorentino et al., 2009; Tyan et al., 2012), and neurite outgrowth (Milward et al., 1992; Perez et al., 1997; Gakhar-Koppole et al., 2008; Osterfield et al., 2008; Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Hoe et al., 2009; Sernagor et al., 2010; Chasseigneaux et al., 2011; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Bony et al., 2013; Hasebe et al., 2013; Favuzzi et al., 2021). Here, we sought to determine whether GABABR mediates effects of sAPPα on neurite outgrowth.

Our study demonstrates that knock-out of GABABR1a promotes axon outgrowth in primary hippocampal neurons. We also show that both sAPPα and APP 17mer inhibit axon outgrowth and that these effects can be reversed by either removing the ExD of sAPPα or by genetically ablating GABABR1a. Together, these findings indicate that GABABR1a is a key mediator of the inhibitory effect of sAPPα on axon outgrowth.

Materials and Methods

Mouse models

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation animal care committee's regulations. C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories) were group housed in the AALAS-accredited OMRF vivarium operating on a 14/10 h light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water. Timed mated females and their embryonic litters used to generate primary neurons for experimentation. GABABR1a knock-out (KO) mice generated by the VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research Mouse Expertise Unit with support from VIB Discovery Sciences. Sperm from GABABR1a KO mice were provided by Joris de Wit, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium, and then mice were rederived at the Texas A&M Institute for Genomic Medicine. For the generation of embryonic litters from GABABR1a KO mice, two heterozygous adults were paired for timed mating. The resulting litters contained WT (+/+), Het (+/−), and KO (−/−) embryos, which were used for primary cultures. Genotyping was performed on utilizing the KAPA Hotstart Mouse Genotyping Kit (Kapa Biosystems KK7352) with the following primers: mGABBR1Fwd1 [5′-GGAAGAAGAACAGGGGGA-3′], mGABBR1Rev1 [5′-AGGAGGTCAGGAGTTGTG-3′].

Primary mouse hippocampal neuron culture

Hippocampal neurons were isolated from embryonic day 18 (E18) mouse brains of either sex. Hippocampi were dissected by decapitating the embryos and placing the heads into ice-cold Hanks balanced salt solution without magnesium and calcium (Invitrogen 14-175-095), supplemented with the following (in mM): 2.5 HEPES, 30 d-glucose, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, and 4 NaHCO3 (cHBSS). The brain was extracted, and the hippocampus was dissected into ice-cold cHBSS. Tissues were dissociated by incubation in cHBSS with 0.25% trypsin (Invitrogen 15090046) and DNAse (50 µg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich 11284932001) for 15 min at 37°C, followed by gentle trituration using a flame-polished Pasteur pipette. Cells were washed with cHBSS three times and plated at 75,000 cells/ml on 12 mm coverslips precoated with poly-d-lysine (Neuvitro GG-12-PDL), coated with laminin (0.001 mg/ml; Invitrogen 114956-81-9 L2020). Coverslips were placed into a 12-well cell culture dish (Corning 353043) filled with cHBSS. Neurons were fed by half media change after 3 h with Hippocampal Feeding Media (HFM): Neurobasal medium (Invitrogen 21103049) supplemented with 1× B27 (Invitrogen 17504044), 0.25× GlutaMAX (Invitrogen 35050061), 0.24% d-glucose (Thermo Fisher Scientific A16828.0C), penicillin/streptomycin (20 U/ml; Invitrogen 15140122), and 24.2 µM β-mercaptoethanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific 2198502). For the litters from the GABABR1a+/− matings, embryonic tissue samples were used for genotyping as described above. The dissected hippocampi were dissociated separately and plated onto batches of coverslips independently. After same-day genotyping, coverslips of the three possible genotypes GABABR1a+/+, GABABR1a+/−, and GABABR1a−/− were selected for treatment. Cells were treated with purified proteins, synthetic peptides, or pharmacological agents by bath application 3 h after plating. Purified sAPPα and sAPPαΔExD proteins (see plasmids and purification methods below) or synthetic APP 17mer and scrambled 17mer peptides (described below) were applied at a final concentration ranging from 1 to 500 nM. The GABABR agonist baclofen (Sigma-Aldrich 63701-55-3) and antagonist (Sigma-Aldrich SML3136) were both bath applied at 10 µM. Neurons were maintained in HFM and fixed 72 h after plating.

Plasmids

sAPP-Fc constructs were provided by Dr. Joris de Wit, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium. sAPP-Fc constructs were originally generated by PCR-amplifying the following regions of mouse APP695: sAPPα, 18–612 aa; sAPPαΔExD, 19–194 aa and 228–596 aa. Each of the PCR fragments were subcloned between and in frame with the prolactin signal peptide and human Fc in the pLP-FLAG-IgG vector using Gibson Assembly (NEB).

Protein purification

Secreted C-terminally Fc-tagged proteins were expressed by transient transfection using polyethylenimine (PEI; Kyfora Bio 23966) in HEK293T cells and collected in serum-free Opti-MEM (Invitrogen 31985088). Conditioned medium was passed through a Protein-G Sepharose packed column (Cytiva 17061802) at 4°C, washed with 250 ml of wash buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 450 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), and Fc tag cleaved O/N with GST-tagged 3C PreScission Protease (Cytiva 27084301) in cleavage buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT). Cleaved protein was collected in the eluate and the protease separated from the eluted proteins using a Glutathione Sepharose (Cytiva 17513201) column collecting in TNE buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Proteins were dialyzed against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) O/N, concentrated using centrifugal filter units (Millipore Sigma UFC9010), and depleted of endotoxin with Pierce High Capacity Endotoxin Removal Spin Columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific 88274). Protein concentration was determined by BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific 23227) and verified by Coomassie SDS-PAGE.

Western blotting

Lysates obtained from DIV 3 hippocampal primary neurons, HEK293T cells transfected with mouse GABABR1b (pCMV6-Entry vector) or human GABABR1a (pEZ-MO2 vector), and synaptosome extracted from mouse brains were quantified using the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific 23227). Then, 8 µg of primary neuron and synaptosome lysate and 0.5 µg of HEK293 cell lysate was mixed with 10× reducing agent (Invitrogen, NP0004) and 4× NuPAGE LDS Sample Buffer (Invitrogen, NP0007), heated for 8 min at 70°C, and resolved on 4–12% bis-tris Nu-PAGE gels (Invitrogen, NP0322) with MOPS running buffer (Invitrogen, NP0001) in an Invitrogen XCell4 SureLock Midi-Cell (Invitrogen, WR0100). Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, 1620112) using Bio-Rad Criterion Western Blot transfer electrophoresis tank (BIORAD, 1704070) at 400 mA for 90 min. Membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in water for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies GBR1 (rabbit, Cell Signaling 3835), β-actin (mouse, Sigma A2228) diluted 1:1,000 in 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS (PBST). After washing three times with PBST, membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies (LICOR, 92632213 and LICOR, 92668072) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized using a fluorescence imaging system (LICOR CLx-9140).

Synthetic peptides

The following peptides were synthesized by Insight Biotechnology at >98% purity:

APP 17mer (204–220AA of APP695): acetyl-DDSDVWWGGADTDYADG-amide

Scrambled 17mer: acetyl-DWGADTVSGDGYDAWDD-amide.

Immunocytochemistry and light microscopy

For fluorescence staining, cells were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 15 min. Fixed samples were washed three times in PBS, 5 min per wash. The fixed neurons were then blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS supplemented with Triton X-100 (0.2%) O/N at 4°C and stained with primary mouse monoclonal Tau-1 antibody to an axon specific microtubule associated protein (1:1,000 dilution; Millipore Sigma MAB3420), primary chicken MAP2 antibody to stain dendrites (1:1,000; Abcam Ab5392), and a primary rabbit Tuj1 antibody against pan-neuronal β3 tubulin (1:1,000 dilution; Abcam Ab18207). Samples were then secondary antibody conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Southern Biotech 6410-30), Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher Scientific A78950), or Alexa Fluor 647 (BioLegend 406414) reconstituted at 1, 2, and 0.5 mg/ml, respectively, all used at 1:200 dilution. Light microscopy imaging was performed using an Axioscan7 Whole Slide Scanner at 40× air magnification with the OMRF Imaging Core Facility.

Image analysis

All analysis was performed blinded to treatment conditions. Blinding was achieved through basic Caesar cipher of files names and pseudo labeling of slides prior to imaging on the Axioscan 7. The region of interest for analysis was 21 mm2 and neurons were measured within the ROI in clockwise manner starting from a random corner of the image until the target number of neurons were measured (60–90/coverslip). Measurements were taken using ImageJ Simple Neurite Tracer (SNT) software. Axon lengths were measured from the axon hillock to the tip of the longest primary neurite stained by Tau-1 (Axon Marker). Neurite lengths were determined in three independent experiments using images acquired at 25–40× magnification stained by Tau-1 (Axon Marker) and MAP2 (Dendrite Marker) for the purpose of differentiating the neuronal compartments. Images were imported into ImageJ using the bio-formats importer plug-in. The images were then imported into the SNT plug-in and axon filaments were traced using the filament tracer algorithm. Blinding was removed after datasets were collected. Neuronal polarity was determined by categorizing neurons possessing multiple axons (two or more neurites stained predominantly by Tau-1), a single axon (one neurite stained predominantly by Tau-1), or no axon (no neurites stained predominantly by Tau-1).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software and is summarized in Table 1. Normality was determined by Anderson–Darling and Shapiro–Wilk test. Significance was determined using Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple-comparison post hoc test. Graphs were produced using GraphPad Prism.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Statistical table

Results

GABABR has been implicated in the regulation of neurite outgrowth of mouse primary neurons (Bony et al., 2013). To confirm these findings, we treated hippocampal neurons isolated from wild-type C57BL/6J E18 mouse embryos with baclofen, an agonist of GABABR, or CGP54626, an antagonist of GABABR. Neurons were treated 3 h after plating and immunostained after 3 d in vitro (3 DIV) for MAP2 to label dendrites and Tau to label axons (Fig. 1A). Consistent with previous findings (Bony et al., 2013), we found that bath application of 10 µM baclofen significantly reduced axon length by 9% compared with untreated controls and 10 µM CGP 54626 increased axon length by 14% (Fig. 1B). By Western blot analysis, both GABABR1A and GABABR1B are expressed in these cultures at 3 DIV, with GABABR1A being more prominent (Fig. 1C). Baclofen and CGP54626 are not isoform-specific in their modulation of the GABABR; therefore, to determine whether GABABR1a, which specifically binds sAPPα, regulates neurite outgrowth, we performed neurite outgrowth assays on primary neurons isolated from littermates that were full KO (GABABR1a−/−), heterozygous KO (GABABR1a+/−), or wild-type (GABABR1a+/+; Fig. 1D). We found that the length of the longest axon was significantly increased by 27% in GABABR1a+/− neurons and 9% in GABABR1a−/− as compared with GABABR1a+/+ (Fig. 1E). Primary axon branches were reduced in GABABR1a−/− neurons as compared with GABABR1a+/+ (Extended Data Fig. 1-1A).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Modulation of GABABR influences axon outgrowth in primary neurons. A, Representative images of hippocampal primary neurons derived from C57BL/6J E18 mouse pups treated at DIV 0 with baclofen (GABABR agonist) or CGP54626 (GABABR antagonist) and immunostained at DIV3 with MAP2 (green, dendritic marker) and Tau (magenta, axonal marker). B, Baclofen treatment significantly decreased axon length (N = 180–220 neurons/trial across 5 trials; median = 0.9187, IQR = 0.6672–1.259). CGP54626 treatment significantly increased axon outgrowth (N = 180–220 neurons/trial across 5 trials; median = 1.145, IQR = 0.8696–1.451) compared with untreated controls. C, Western blot of DIV 3 primary cultures probed for GABABR1 and β-actin. HEK293 cells transfected with GABABR1a and GABABR1b as well as synaptosomes are shown for reference. Then, 8 µg of protein was loaded for primary cultures and synaptosomes, whereas only 0.5 was loaded of transfected HEK293 cells. D, Representative images of hippocampal primary neurons derived from wild-type (+/+), heterozygous GABABR1a KO (−/+), and homozygous GABABR1a KO (−/−) E18 littermates treated at DIV 0 with baclofen and immunostained at DIV3 with MAP2 (green, dendritic marker) and Tau (magenta, axonal marker). E, Axon length was significantly increased in both GABABR1a (−/−) and (−/+) neurons compared with controls (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 1.096 and 1.274; IQR = 0.8413–1.469 and 0.8797–1.977, respectively). F, Baclofen treatment significantly decreased axon length in primary neurons derived from GABABR1a (+/+) and (−/+) mice (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 0.6067 and 0.6067, IQR = 0.4911–0.7975 and 0.4461–0.8122, respectively). Controls from panel D and E are the same, normalized differently for comparison. In panel E, each genotype is normalized to its own untreated control. Polarity graphs show means and standard deviation. Other graphs show medians and interquartile ranges. Scale bars, 50 µm. Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple-comparison post hoc test were used. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05). Axon branch number is quantified in Extended Data Figure 1-1 and neuronal polarity is quantified in Extended Data Figure 1-2.

Figure 1-1

Full genetic ablation of GABABR1a decreases axonal branch number but is unaffected by baclofen treatment. A) The number of primary axon branches was decreased in GABABR1a KO (-/-) primary neurons (N = 15-30 neurons/trial across 3 trials; Median = 2.5, IQR = 1-5) compared to controls. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test were used. *P < 0.05; ns, not significant (P > 0.05). B) The number of primary axon branches of baclofen treated neurons show no significant differences from untreated controls across all genotypes (+/+),(+/-),(-/-) (N = 15-30 primary axons/trial across 3 trials; Untreated Control Medians = 4.5,3.0,3.0, IQRs = 2.0-7.0, 1.75-4.25, 1.0-5.0 respectively). Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test were used. Comparisons not displayed are not significant (P > 0.05). Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

Figure 1-2

Neuronal polarity is unaffected by genetic ablation of GABABR1a. Representative images of neurons with multi axon (MA) single axon (SA)and no axon (NA). The fraction of SA, NA, MA neurons across genotypes all (+/+),(+/-),(-/-). Treatment with baclofen was not significantly different from untreated controls (N = 90-160 neurons/trial across 3 trials; Untreated Control Means SA = 0.7167, 0.7300, 0.6700; StDev. = 0.04041, 0.1136, 0.1513; Untreated Control Means NA = 0.2267, 0.1433, 0.1159; StDev = 0.04041, 0.06658, 0.06692; Untreated Control Means MA = 0.05667, 0.1300, 0.06667; StDev = 0.01155, 0.05292, 0.05508 respectively). Comparisons not displayed are not significant (P > 0.05). Download Figure 1-2, TIF file.

To determine the contribution of GABABR1a to the reduction in axonal length by baclofen, we treated GABABR1a−/−, GABABR1a−/+, and GABABR1a+/+ neurons with 10 µM baclofen. Baclofen significantly reduced axon length by 40% in both wild-type and heterozygous GABABR1a KO neurons but produced no significant changes to axon length of GABABR1a KO neurons (Fig. 1F). Baclofen produced no significant effects on the number of primary axon branches in any of the three genotypes (Extended Data Fig. 1-1B). Since effects on neuronal polarity can lead to changes in neurite outgrowth assays, we quantified the fraction of neurons with a single axon (SA), no axon (NA), or multi-axons (MA) and found that baclofen did not significantly affect polarity with baclofen treatment in any of the genotypes (Extended Data Fig. 1-2). These findings, taken together, demonstrate that GABABR1a reduces axon outgrowth in primary neuron cultures.

sAPPα binds to the sushi-1 domain present in the 1a isoform of GABABR (Rice et al., 2019); therefore, we sought to determine whether GABABR1a mediates the effects of sAPPα on neurite outgrowth. sAPPα (Fig. 2A) was affinity purified from transfected–human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 T cell supernatants (Fig. 2B). Previous studies evaluating sAPPα treatment have used concentrations ranging from 1 to 150 nM (Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Hasebe et al., 2013); however, sAPPα binds the sushi-1 domain at a dissociation constant (KD) of 431 nM (Rice et al., 2019). Therefore, we treated neurons with concentrations of sAPPα ranging from 1 to 500 nM. sAPPα at lower concentrations (1–200 nM) increased length of the longest axon between 14 and 21%; whereas 500 nM sAPPα decreased the length of the longest axon by 20% (Fig. 2D). To determine if the GABABR1a binding region is required for this inhibitory effect of sAPPα on axon outgrowth, we treated wild-type neurons with 500 nM sAPPα or sAPPα lacking the ExD (sAPPα-ΔExD; Fig. 2B). Treatment with 500 nM sAPPα reduced axon length by 36% compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2E,F). Treatment with 500 nM sAPPα-ΔExD did not significantly affect axon length compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2E,F), indicating that inhibition of axon outgrowth by sAPPα requires the ExD. Previously, binding between sAPPα and GABABR1a was mapped to a 17aa region within the ExD of APP (Rice et al., 2019). This APP 17mer was sufficient to mimic the GABABR1a-dependent effects on synaptic transmission (Rice et al., 2019). To determine if APP 17mer could also modulate axon outgrowth, we applied 500 nM APP 17mer or its scrambled control peptide. APP 17mer reduced axon length by 11% compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2E,F); whereas, a scrambled 17mer peptide did not significantly affect axon length. Together, these findings are consistent with a role for GABABR1a in mediating the inhibitory effect of 500 nM sAPPα on neurite outgrowth in primary mouse neurons.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

sAPPα reduces axon length in primary neurons in a dose-dependent manner. A, Diagram of the domains of sAPP(695)α. B, Coomassie stain of sAPPα and sAPPα-ΔExD purified proteins. C, Representative images of hippocampal primary neurons derived from C57BL/6J E18 mouse pups treated at DIV 0 with sAPPα at increasing concentrations 1–500 nM. D, Treatment with sAPPα at lower concentrations 1–200 nM increased axon outgrowth compared with controls (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 1.200 and 1.145, IQR = 0.9020–1.579 and 0.8508–1.508, respectively), whereas 500 nM treatment reduced axon outgrowth (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 0.8069, IQR = 0.5983–1.062). E, Representative images of hippocampal primary neurons derived from C57BL/6J E18 mouse pups treated at DIV 0 with sAPPα, sAPPα-ΔExD, APP 17mer, or scrambled 17mer and immunostained at DIV3 with MAP2 (green, dendritic marker) and Tau (magenta, axonal marker). F, Treatment with sAPPα and 17mer decreased axon length in primary neurons compared with untreated controls (N = 180–200 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 0.6461 and 0.8894, IQR = 0.4562–0.9462 and 0.6007–1.258, respectively). Treatment with sAPPα-ΔExD and scrambled 17mer had no significant effect on axon length. Graphs show medians and interquartile ranges. Scale bars, 50 µm. Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple-comparison post hoc test were used. **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant.

To test whether GABABR1a is required for the inhibition of axon outgrowth by sAPPα, we cultured primary neurons from GABABR1a−/−, GABABR1a+/−, or GABABR1a+/+ littermates and treated each genotype with 500 nM sAPPα, sAPPα-ΔExD, APP 17mer, and scrambled 17mer. sAPPα reduced axon length by 23% in GABABR1a+/+ neurons and 42% in GABABR1a+/− neurons, whereas sAPPα-ΔExD had no significant effect on axon length (Fig. 3A,B). Similarly, 500 nM APP 17mer resulted in a 34% reduction in axon length of GABABR1a+/+ and 36% reduction in GABABR1a+/− neurons compared with untreated controls, whereas scrambled 17mer had no significant effect on axon length (Fig. 3A,B). Strikingly, the effects of sAPPα and APP 17mer on axon length were abolished in GABABR1a−/− neurons (Fig. 3A,B). No significant effects on axon branching (Extended Data Fig. 3-1) or neuronal polarity (Extended Data Fig. 3-2) were observed across treatments in each of the three genotypes. Together, these findings demonstrate that sAPPα requires the presence of GABABR1a to inhibit neurite outgrowth.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The effects of sAPPα and APP 17mer are abolished in GABABR1a−/− neurons. A, Representative images of hippocampal primary neurons derived from wild-type (+/+), heterozygous GABABR1a KO (−/+), and homozygous GABABR1a KO (−/−) E18 littermates treated at DIV 0 with sAPPα, sAPPα-ΔExD, APP 17mer, or scrambled 17mer and immunostained at DIV3 with MAP2 (green, dendritic marker) and Tau (magenta, axonal marker). B, Treatment with sAPPα significantly reduced axon length in both GABABR1a +/+ and −/+ neurons (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 0.6613 and 0.5940, IQR = 0.5305–0.9274 and 0.4785–0.9049, respectively). Treatment with APP 17mer significantly reduced axon length in both GABABR1a +/+ and −/+ neurons (N = 60–90 neurons/trial across 3 trials; medians = 0.6832 and 0.6568, IQR = 0.4906–0.9480 and 0.4213–0.7989, respectively). Treatment with sAPPα and APP 17mer had no significant effect on axon length in GABABR1a −/− neurons. Untreated controls in 3B are the same neurons as in Figure 1E,F. Scale bars, 50 µm. Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's multiple-comparison post hoc test were used. ****p < 0.0001; ns, not significant. Axon branch number is quantified in Extended Data Figure 3-1 and neuronal polarity is quantified in Extended Data Figure 3-2.

Figure 3-1

Axonal branch number is unaffected by sAPPα or APP 17mer treatment. Primary axon branch number was not significantly different with treatment of sAPPα, sAPPα-ΔExD, APP 17mer, or scrambled 17mer in any of the three genotypes (+/+),(+/-),(-/-) (N = 15-30 axons/trial across 3 trials; Untreated Control Medians = 4.5,3.0,3.0, IQRs = 2.0-7.0, 1.75-4.25, 1.0-5.0 respectively). Untreated controls in Extended Figure 3-1 are the same neurons as in Extended Figures 1-1, 1-2. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test were used. Comparisons not displayed are not significant (P > 0.05). Download Figure 3-1, TIF file.

Figure 3-2

Neuronal polarity is unaffected by treatment with APP peptides. The cell fraction of SA, NA, MA neurons across genotypes and treatment with APP peptides was not significantly different from WT controls (N = 90-160 neurons/trial across 3 trials; Untreated Control Means SA = 0.7167, 0.7300, 0.6700; StDev. = 0.04041, 0.1136, 0.1513; Untreated Control Means NA = 0.2267, 0.1433, 0.1159; StDev = 0.04041, 0.06658, 0.06692; Untreated Control Means MA = 0.05667, 0.1300, 0.06667; StDev = 0.01155, 0.05292, 0.05508 respectively) (N = 90-160 neurons/trial across 3 trials; Mean = 71.6; StDev. = 4%, 22.6 StDev = 4%, 5.67 StDev = 1%, respectively). Untreated controls in Extended Figure 3-2 are the same neurons as in Extended Figures 1-3. Comparisons not displayed are not significant (P > 0.05). Download Figure 3-2, TIF file.

Discussion

Here, we found that 500 nM sAPPα reduces axon outgrowth in mouse primary hippocampal neurons (Fig. 2D,F). This effect required the presence of both GABABR1a and the ExD of sAPPα, which mediates its interaction with GABABR1a (Fig. 3A,B). The APP 17mer, which was previously shown to bind GABABR1a and mimic the effects of sAPP on synaptic transmission (Rice et al., 2019), also reduced axon outgrowth in WT but not in GABABR1a KO neurons (Fig. 3A,B). Together, these findings demonstrate that sAPPα inhibits axon outgrowth in primary mouse neurons via GABABR1a.

Previously, GABABR has been implicated in regulating neurite outgrowth, with activation by the agonist baclofen reported to reduce axon length and inhibition by CGP reported to enhance axon length in primary neurons (Bony et al., 2013). Our present study not only confirms these findings (Fig. 1B) but also establishes a role for the GABABR1a isoform in this effect. We show that both partial and full ablation of GABABR1a promotes neurite outgrowth (Fig. 1D) and the inhibition of neurite outgrowth by the GABABR agonist baclofen requires the presence of GABABR1a (Fig. 1E). Thus, the 1a isoform contributes to GABABR-dependent suppression of neurite outgrowth.

Decades of research across multiple groups has demonstrated that both full length APP and sAPPα play a role in neurite outgrowth (Chau et al., 2023). The prevailing consensus is that ablation of full-length APP promotes neurite outgrowth in primary neuron cultures (Perez et al., 1997; Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2021), although a reduction in axon outgrowth has also been recently reported (Southam et al., 2019). Paradoxically, numerous studies report that application of sAPPα also promotes neurite outgrowth (Milward et al., 1992; Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Chasseigneaux et al., 2011; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Hasebe et al., 2013; Dorard et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021). As an exception, one study found that neurons cocultured with APP KO astrocytes had elongated neurites, suggesting that sAPPα can, under certain conditions, inhibit neurite outgrowth (Perez et al., 1997). Consistent with this and aligning with the observation that APP ablation enhances neurite outgrowth, our current findings indicate that sAPPα can reduce neurite outgrowth. Our findings suggest the directionality of the effect of sAPPα may depend on its context-dependent interactions with different binding partners. We found that at low concentrations (1–200 nM), sAPPα enhances axon outgrowth, consistent with concentrations and effects reported previously (Young-Pearse et al., 2008; Billnitzer et al., 2013; Hasebe et al., 2013; Dorard et al., 2018). In contrast, at a higher concentration (500 nM), which approximates the reported KD of 431 nM for binding of sAPPα to the sushi-1 of GABABR1a, we observe a reduction in axon outgrowth. Importantly, neither negative controls (sAPPΔExD and scrambled 17mer) applied to wild-type neurons nor 500 nM sAPPα applied to GABABR1a KO neurons reduced axon length, demonstrating that the effects observed at higher concentrations are not due to general neuronal toxicity. Rather, these findings suggest that at elevated concentrations, interaction of sAPPα to GABABR1a may dominate and shift the functional outcome. APP expression is high during early development (Hung et al., 1992; Kirazov et al., 2001), providing a physiological context in which the reported effects may be observed. At lower concentrations, sAPPα may promote neurite outgrowth through binding to other interactors, such as Integrin β1 (Young-Pearse et al., 2008). Interestingly, synaptic activity is known to regulate APP processing (Cirrito et al., 2005; Cheon et al., 2008; Tampellini et al., 2009; Kleschevnikov et al., 2012b) and could thereby tightly regulate neurite outgrowth.

Our data includes multiple independent datasets examining baclofen (Fig. 1B,F) and 500 nM sAPPα (Fig. 2D,F,B) on wild-type neurons. These conditions were incorporated into multiple sets of experiments to allow additional treatments and genotypes to be directly compared within the same experiment. Across all experiments, both baclofen and 500 nM sAPPα produced a statistically significant decrease in axon length. However, the magnitude of these effects varied between experiments, likely reflecting inherent variability in axon lengths within and between neuronal cultures. This variability may also account for the unexpectedly larger effect size observed in the partial GABABR1A KO cultures compared with the full KO cultures.

APP and GABABR have each been independently implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X syndrome (Westmark et al., 2011, 2016a,b; Henderson et al., 2012; Ray et al., 2016; Kang et al., 2017), autism spectrum disorders (Fatemi et al., 2009; Wegiel et al., 2012; Frackowiak et al., 2013, 2020; Li et al., 2022), and Down syndrome (Best et al., 2007; Kleschevnikov et al., 2012b). In Down syndrome, APP expression is increased due to triplication (Cheon et al., 2008), and pharmacological inhibition of GABABR has been shown to rescue deficits in a Down syndrome mouse model (Kleschevnikov et al., 2012a). Our findings support a functional link between dysregulation of APP and GABABR signaling pathways in neurodevelopment. The ability of a short APP-derived 17mer peptide to activate this pathway highlights the therapeutic potential of targeting APP-GABABR1a signaling for the treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Footnotes

  • H.C.R. is an inventor on a patent on the APP-GABABR interaction that is owned by VIB (Flemish Institute of Biotechnology) and the KU Leuven: Patent no. WO2018015296A1, “Therapeutic agents for neurological and psychiatric disorders.”

  • We thank Yvonne Thomason, Suyesha Bhandari, and Charles Lacy for technical support and Dominika Siodlak for scientific discussions. Image acquisition was supported by the OMRF Imaging Core Facility and the OUHSC Molecular Analysis and Cellular Imaging Core of the “Cellular and Molecular GeroScience CoBRE.” Data processing and analysis were supported by the OMRF Center for Biomedical Data Sciences.

  • This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R35GM142726, T32AG052363, P20GM1125528), the Presbyterian Health Foundation (Pilot Research Funding), and the OUHSC College of Medicine Alumni Association (Pilot Research Funding).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Best TK,
    2. Siarey RJ,
    3. Galdzicki Z
    (2007) Ts65dn, a mouse model of down syndrome, exhibits increased GABA B-induced potassium current. J Neurophysiol 97:892–900. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00626.2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Billnitzer AJ,
    2. Barskaya I,
    3. Yin C,
    4. Perez RG
    (2013) APP independent and dependent effects on neurite outgrowth are modulated by the receptor associated protein (RAP). J Neurochem 124:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.12051
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bony G,
    2. Szczurkowska J,
    3. Tamagno I,
    4. Shelly M,
    5. Contestabile A,
    6. Cancedda L
    (2013) Non-hyperpolarizing GABAB receptor activation regulates neuronal migration and neurite growth and specification by CAMP/LKB1. Nat Commun 4:1800. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2820
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Callahan DG,
    2. Taylor WM,
    3. Tilearcio M,
    4. Cavanaugh T,
    5. Selkoe DJ,
    6. Young-Pearse TL
    (2017) Embryonic mosaic deletion of APP results in displaced Reelin-expressing cells in the cerebral cortex. Dev Biol 424:138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.03.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chasseigneaux S,
    2. Dinc L,
    3. Rose C,
    4. Chabret C,
    5. Coulpier F,
    6. Topilko P,
    7. Mauger G,
    8. Allinquant B
    (2011) Secreted amyloid precursor protein β and secreted amyloid precursor protein α induce axon outgrowth in vitro through Egr1 signaling pathway. PLoS One 6:e16301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chau DD,
    2. Ng LL,
    3. Zhai Y,
    4. Lau KF
    (2023) Amyloid precursor protein and its interacting proteins in neurodevelopment. Biochem Soc Trans 51:1647–1659. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20221527
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cheon MS,
    2. Dierssen M,
    3. Kim SH,
    4. Lubec G
    (2008) Protein expression of BACE1, BACE2 and APP in Down syndrome brains. Amino Acids 35:339–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-007-0618-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cirrito JR,
    2. Yamada KA,
    3. Finn MB,
    4. Sloviter RS,
    5. Bales KR,
    6. May PC,
    7. Schoepp DD,
    8. Paul SM,
    9. Mennerick S,
    10. Holtzman DM
    (2005) Synaptic activity regulates interstitial fluid amyloid-β levels in vivo. Neuron 48:913–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Demars MP,
    2. Bartholomew A,
    3. Strakova Z,
    4. Lazarov O
    (2011) Soluble amyloid precursor protein: a novel proliferation factor of adult progenitor cells of ectodermal and mesodermal origin. Stem Cell Res Ther 2:36. https://doi.org/10.1186/scrt77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Dinamarca MC, et al.
    (2019) Complex formation of APP with GABA B receptors links axonal trafficking to amyloidogenic processing. Nat Commun 10:1331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09164-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Dorard E,
    2. Chasseigneaux S,
    3. Gorisse-Hussonnois L,
    4. Broussard C,
    5. Pillot T,
    6. Allinquant B
    (2018) Soluble amyloid precursor protein alpha interacts with Alpha3-Na, K-ATPAse to induce axonal outgrowth but not neuroprotection: evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying these properties. Mol Neurobiol 55:5594–5610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0783-0
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Fatemi SH,
    2. Folsom TD,
    3. Reutiman TJ,
    4. Thuras PD
    (2009) Expression of GABAB receptors is altered in brains of subjects with autism. Cerebellum 8:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-008-0075-3
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Favuzzi E, et al.
    (2021) GABA-receptive microglia selectively sculpt developing inhibitory circuits. Cell 184:4048–4063.e32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fiorentino H,
    2. Kuczewski N,
    3. Diabira D,
    4. Ferrand N,
    5. Pangalos MN,
    6. Porcher C,
    7. Gaiarsa JL
    (2009) GABAB receptor activation triggers BDNF release and promotes the maturation of GABAergic synapses. J Neurosci 29:11650–11661. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3587-09.2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Frackowiak J,
    2. Mazur-Kolecka B,
    3. Schanen NC,
    4. Brown WT,
    5. Wegiel J
    (2013) The link between intraneuronal N-truncated amyloid-β peptide and oxidatively modified lipids in idiopathic autism and Dup(15q11.2-Q13)/autism. Acta Neuropathol Commun 1:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-5960-1-61
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Frackowiak J,
    2. Mazur-Kolecka B,
    3. Mehta P,
    4. Wegiel J
    (2020) Enhanced accumulation of N-terminally truncated a with and without pyroglutamate-11 modification in parvalbumin-expressing GABAergic neurons in idiopathic and Dup15q11.2-Q13 autism. Acta Neuropathol Commun 8:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-020-00923-8
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Fritschy JM,
    2. Meskenaite V,
    3. Weinmann O,
    4. Honer M,
    5. Benke D,
    6. Mohler H
    (1999) GABAB-receptor splice variants GB1a and GB1b in rat brain: developmental regulation, cellular distribution and extrasynaptic localization. Eur J Neurosci 11:761–768. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00481.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gakhar-Koppole N,
    2. Hundeshagen P,
    3. Mandl C,
    4. Weyer SW,
    5. Allinquant B,
    6. Müller U,
    7. Ciccolini F
    (2008) Activity requires soluble amyloid precursor protein α to promote neurite outgrowth in neural stem cell-derived neurons via activation of the MAPK pathway. Eur J Neurosci 28:871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06398.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Giachino C,
    2. Barz M,
    3. Tchorz JS,
    4. Tome M,
    5. Gassmann M,
    6. Bischofberger J,
    7. Bettler B,
    8. Taylor V
    (2014) GABA suppresses neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus through GABAB receptors. Development 141:83–90. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.102608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Glenner GG,
    2. Wong CW
    (1984) Alzheimer’s disease: initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 120:885–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(84)80190-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hasebe N,
    2. Fujita Y,
    3. Ueno M,
    4. Yoshimura K,
    5. Fujino Y,
    6. Yamashita T
    (2013) Soluble β-amyloid precursor protein alpha binds to P75 neurotrophin receptor to promote neurite outgrowth. PLoS One 8:e82321. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hefter D,
    2. Ludewig S,
    3. Draguhn A,
    4. Korte M
    (2020) Amyloid, APP, and electrical activity of the brain. Neuroscientist 26:231–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858419882619
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Henderson C, et al.
    (2012) Reversal of disease-related pathologies in the fragile X mouse model by selective activation of GABAB receptors with arbaclofen. Sci Transl Med 4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3004218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hoe HS, et al.
    (2009) Interaction of Reelin with amyloid precursor protein promotes neurite outgrowth. J Neurosci 29:7459–7473. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4872-08.2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Hung AY,
    2. Koo EH,
    3. Haass C,
    4. Selkoe DJ
    (1992) Increased expression of β-amyloid precursor protein during neuronal differentiation is not accompanied by secretory cleavage. Neurobiology 89:9439–9443. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.20.9439
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Kang JY, et al.
    (2017) Deficits in the activity of presynaptic-aminobutyric acid type B receptors contribute to altered neuronal excitability in fragile X syndrome. J Biol Chem 292:6621–6632. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.772541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Khoshdel-Sarkarizi H,
    2. Hami J,
    3. Mohammadipour A,
    4. Sadr-Nabavi A,
    5. Mahmoudi M,
    6. Kheradmand H,
    7. Peyvandi M,
    8. Nourmohammadi E,
    9. Haghir H
    (2019) Developmental regulation and lateralization of GABA receptors in the rat hippocampus. Int J Dev Neurosci 76:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2019.07.006
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Kirazov E,
    2. Kirazov L,
    3. Bigl V,
    4. Schliebs R
    (2001) Ontogenetic changes in protein level of amyloid precursor protein (APP) in growth cones and synaptosomes from rat brain and prenatal expression pattern of APP MRNA isoforms in developing rat embryo. Int J Dev Neurosci 19:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5748(01)00012-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kleschevnikov AM,
    2. Belichenko PV,
    3. Faizi M,
    4. Jacobs LF,
    5. Htun K,
    6. Shamloo M,
    7. Mobley WC
    (2012a) Deficits in cognition and synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of Down syndrome ameliorated by GABA B receptor antagonists. J Neurosci 32:9217–9227. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1673-12.2012
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Kleschevnikov AM,
    2. Belichenko PV,
    3. Gall J,
    4. George L,
    5. Nosheny R,
    6. Maloney MT,
    7. Salehi A,
    8. Mobley WC
    (2012b) Increased efficiency of the GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome. Neurobiol Dis 45:683–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2011.10.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Li X, et al.
    (2022) Regressive autism spectrum disorder: high levels of total secreted amyloid precursor protein and secreted amyloid precursor protein-α in plasma. Front Psychiatry 13:809543. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.809543
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Liu T, et al.
    (2021) The amyloid precursor protein is a conserved Wnt receptor. Elife 10:e69199. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69199
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Ma QH, et al.
    (2008) A TAG1-APP signalling pathway through Fe65 negatively modulates neurogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 10:283–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1690
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Meier SD,
    2. Kafitz KW,
    3. Rose CR
    (2008) Developmental profile and mechanisms of GABA-induced calcium signaling in hippocampal astrocytes. Glia 56:1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.20684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Milward EA,
    2. Papadopoulos R,
    3. Fuller SJ,
    4. Moir RD,
    5. Small D,
    6. Beyreuther K,
    7. Masters CL
    (1992) The amyloid protein precursor of Alzheimer’s disease is a mediator of the effects of nerve growth factor on neurite outgrowth. Neuron 9:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6273(92)90228-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Nicolas M,
    2. Hassan BA
    (2014) Amyloid precursor protein and neural development. Development 141:2543–2548. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.108712
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Osterfield M,
    2. Egelund R,
    3. Young LM,
    4. Flanagan JG
    (2008) Interaction of amyloid precursor protein with contactins and NgCAM in the retinotectal system. Development 135:1189–1199. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.007401
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Perez RG,
    2. Zheng H,
    3. Van der Ploeg LH,
    4. Koo EH
    (1997) The β-amyloid precursor protein of Alzheimer’s disease enhances neuron viability and modulates neuronal polarity. J Neurosci 17:9407–9414. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-24-09407.1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Pin JP,
    2. Bettler B
    (2016) Organization and functions of MGlu and GABA B receptor complexes. Nature 540:60–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20566
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Ray B,
    2. Sokol DK,
    3. Maloney B,
    4. Lahiri DK
    (2016) Finding novel distinctions between the SAPPα-mediated anabolic biochemical pathways in autism spectrum disorder and fragile X syndrome plasma and brain tissue. Sci Rep 6:26052. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26052
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Rem PD, et al.
    (2023) Soluble amyloid-β precursor peptide does not regulate GABAB receptor activity. Elife 12:e82082. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82082
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Rice HC,
    2. Townsend M,
    3. Bai J,
    4. Suth S,
    5. Cavanaugh W,
    6. Selkoe DJ,
    7. Young-Pearse TL
    (2012) Pancortins interact with amyloid precursor protein and modulate cortical cell migration. Development 139:3986–3996. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.082909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Rice HC, et al.
    (2019) Secreted amyloid-β precursor protein functions as a GABA B R1a ligand to modulate synaptic transmission. Science 363:eaao4827. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4827
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Schwenk J, et al.
    (2016) Modular composition and dynamics of native GABAB receptors identified by high-resolution proteomics. Nat Neurosci 19:233–242. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4198
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Sernagor E,
    2. Chabrol F,
    3. Bony G,
    4. Cancedda L
    (2010) Gabaergic control of neurite outgrowth and remodeling during development and adult neurogenesis: general rules and differences in diverse systems. Front Cell Neurosci 4:11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2010.00011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Southam KA,
    2. Stennard F,
    3. Pavez C,
    4. Small DH
    (2019) Knockout of amyloid β protein precursor (APP) expression alters synaptogenesis, neurite branching and axonal morphology of hippocampal neurons. Neurochem Res 44:1346–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-018-2512-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Tampellini D, et al.
    (2009) Synaptic activity reduces intraneuronal Aβ, promotes APP transport to synapses, and protects against Aβ-related synaptic alterations. J Neurosci 29:9704–9713. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2292-09.2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Tyan S, et al.
    (2012) Amyloid precursor protein (APP) regulates synaptic structure and function. Mol Cell Neurosci 51:43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcn.2012.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Wegiel J, et al.
    (2012) Abnormal intracellular accumulation and extracellular Aβ deposition in idiopathic and Dup15q11.2-Q13 autism spectrum disorders. PLoS One 7:e35414. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035414
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Westmark CJ, et al.
    (2011) Reversal of fragile X phenotypes by manipulation of AβPP/Aβ levels in Fmr1 KO mice. PLoS One 6:e26549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026549
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Westmark CJ,
    2. Chuang SC,
    3. Hays SA,
    4. Filon MJ,
    5. Ray BC,
    6. Westmark PR,
    7. Gibson JR,
    8. Huber KM,
    9. Wong RK
    (2016a) APP causes hyperexcitability in fragile X mice. Front Mol Neurosci 9:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2016.00147
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Westmark CJ,
    2. Sokol DK,
    3. Maloney B,
    4. Lahiri DK
    (2016b) Novel roles of amyloid-beta precursor protein metabolites in fragile X syndrome and autism. Mol Psychiatry 21:1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.134
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Young-Pearse TL,
    2. Bai J,
    3. Chang R,
    4. Zheng JB,
    5. Loturco JJ,
    6. Selkoe DJ
    (2007) A critical function for β-amyloid precursor protein in neuronal migration revealed by in utero RNA interference. J Neurosci 27:14459–14469. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4701-07.2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Young-Pearse TL,
    2. Chen AC,
    3. Chang R,
    4. Marquez C,
    5. Selkoe DJ
    (2008) Secreted APP regulates the function of full-length APP in neurite outgrowth through interaction with integrin beta1. Neural Dev 3:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8104-3-15
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Fabienne Poulain, University of South Carolina

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: NONE.

This short manuscript analyzes the effects of soluble APPα (sAPPα) and its interaction with the gamma amino butyric acid receptor type-B subunit 1a (GABABR1A) on axon growth. Using pharmacological treatments of hippocampal neurons in culture, the authors found that application of sAPPα or of a 17 amino acid peptide derived from one of its domains reduces axon length in a GABABR1A manner. Additional experiments and quantifications now further show that the inhibitory effect of sAPPα on axon growth is not due to impaired neuronal polarization and is concentration dependent. Overall, experiments are rigorous, well described, and report a novel function of sAPPα and GABABR1A that should be of high interest for the fields of neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration. The revisions made by the authors strongly strengthen the study, which is now appropriate for publication in eNeuro. The following minor comments should be addressed:

1) In figure 1, the pictures in panel 1A are still too small to see the morphology of the neurons. The size of the pictures should be increased for visibility (the size of pictures shown in panel 1D can also be increased if the concern is to keep all pictures consistent).

2) It would be nice to show beta-actin loading controls for the Western blot shown in figure 1C, especially since the Methods indicate that beta-actin was probed for WB analyses.

3) Line 210 should indicate Figure 1D instead of Figure 1C.

4) To be consistent with Figure 1, extended Figures 1-1 and 1-2 should be combined (two panels within one extended figure). Also, since the samples analyzed in extended figure 1-1 are the same as the untreated controls in extended figures 1-2 and 3-1, why is the significant difference between control +/+ and -/- not indicated in extended figures 1-2 and 3-1?

Author Response

Minor point 1: In figure 1, the pictures in panel 1A are still too small to see the morphology of the neurons. The size of the pictures should be increased for visibility (the size of pictures shown in panel 1D can also be increased if the concern is to keep all pictures consistent).

Response 1: We have further increased the size of panel 1A.

Minor Point 2: It would be nice to show beta-actin loading controls for the Western blot shown in figure 1C, especially since the Methods indicate that beta-actin was probed for WB analyses.

Response 2: We have included the beta-actin loading control blot. As mentioned in the methods, we loaded 8ug of primary neurons and synaptosomes but only 0.5 ug of the transfected HEK293 cells. This is the reason that there is not an apparent beta-actin band for the HEK293 lanes at this exposure. However, HEK293 cells and synaptsomes were included simply to rigorously show where the GABABR isoform should migrate on the primary neuron samples. If we loaded similar equal amounts of transfected HEK293 lysate those lanes would be overexposed and useless. We added the following text to the figure legend to hopefully clarify this for the reader to prevent confusion "Western blot of DIV 3 primary cultures probed for GABABR1 and β-actin. HEK293 cells transfected with GABABR1a and GABABR1b as well as synaptosomes are shown for reference. 8ug of protein was loaded for primary cultures and synaptosomes; whereas, only 0.5 was loaded of transfected HEK293 cells." Minor point 3: Line 210 should indicate Figure 1D instead of Figure 1C.

Response 3: This error has been corrected.

Minor Point 4: To be consistent with Figure 1, extended Figures 1-1 and 1-2 should be combined (two panels within one extended figure). Also, since the samples analyzed in extended figure 1-1 are the same as the untreated controls in extended figures 1-2 and 3-1, why is the significant difference between control +/+ and -/- not indicated in extended figures 1-2 and 3-1? Response 4: We have combined Figures 1-1 and 1-2 into Figure 1-1, panels A &B. We have also corrected figure legends and in text references to these Figures. The reason that the same untreated controls are not significant in new extended figures 1-1B and 3-1 is that the inclusion of additional comparisons in the statistical analysis reduces the statistical significance.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 13 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 13, Issue 2
February 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a
Dylan Barber, Casandra Salinas-Salinas, Samah Houmam, Kriti Shukla, Heather C. Rice
eNeuro 3 February 2026, 13 (2) ENEURO.0345-25.2026; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0345-25.2026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
sAPPα Inhibits Neurite Outgrowth in Primary Mouse Neurons via GABA B Receptor Subunit 1a
Dylan Barber, Casandra Salinas-Salinas, Samah Houmam, Kriti Shukla, Heather C. Rice
eNeuro 3 February 2026, 13 (2) ENEURO.0345-25.2026; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0345-25.2026
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • amyloid precursor protein
  • GABA receptor
  • mouse primary neurons
  • neurite outgrowth

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
Show more Research Article: New Research

Development

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
Show more Development

Subjects

  • Development
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.