Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

The E-Protein Daughterless Regulates Olfactory Learning of Adult Drosophila melanogaster

Laura Tamberg, Carl Sander Kiir, Jürgen Tuvikene, Käthy Rannaste, Mari Palgi, Indrek Koppel and Tõnis Timmusk
eNeuro 7 January 2026, 13 (1) ENEURO.0051-25.2025; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0051-25.2025
Laura Tamberg
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura Tamberg
Carl Sander Kiir
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jürgen Tuvikene
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
2Protobios LLC, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Käthy Rannaste
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mari Palgi
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Indrek Koppel
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tõnis Timmusk
1Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
2Protobios LLC, Tallinn 12618, Harjumaa, Estonia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Genome-wide analysis of Da binding sites by ChIP-seq. a, Visualization of anti-FLAG ChIP-seq data from adult Drosophila heads of 3xFLAG-Da and control (white*) flies. Data were visualized as fold over input, and for graphical visualization two biological replicates were merged. As an example, stripe (sr) gene locus is shown, where 3xFLAG-Da protein binds to the promoter regions and several regions in the introns. b, Distribution of anti-FLAG ChIP peak enrichment relative to TSS and TES. Replicates were merged for visualization. c, Genomic distribution of 3xFLAG-Da protein binding sites. d, MEME-ChIP was used to find transcription factor-binding motifs; E-box sequences CAGCTG and CAGGTG were the most significant. e, The occurrence of all possible E-box motif variants (CANNTG) within ±50 bp of Da ChIP peak summits and in 250 bp shifted control regions. The control region set combines ±50 bp regions after shifting either 250 bp upstream or downstream. Left, Proportions of detected variant E-box motifs (variant NN nucleotides are shown in bold) within the Da ChIP peaks (red) and control regions (gray). Right, Odds ratios from logistic regression analysis comparing E-box presence at Da ChIP peaks versus control regions. Black circles represent the odds ratio (exponent of estimate), and horizontal bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. The red dashed line marks an odds ratio of 1 (no enrichment or depletion). ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05; ns = not significant; BH procedure-adjusted p values. Significantly enriched peaks in 3xFLAG-Da samples compared with white* samples are listed in Extended Data Figure 1-1.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Emc overexpression impairs Da transcriptional activity in vivo. a, Light micrographs of adult flies; control, elavC155-Gal4/white*; DaOE, elavC155-Gal4 > da; EmcOE, elavC155-Gal4 > emc; DaOE, EmcOE, elavC155-Gal4 > Da,Emc. b, Schematic representation of in vivo luciferase reporter assay (created using BioRender.com). Transgenic flies containing minimal promoter (min) and a firefly luciferase reporter gene (Firefly luciferase) for min-luc or 12xCAGCTG E-boxes (12xE-box), minimal promoter, and a firefly luciferase reporter gene for 12xE-box-min-luc were used. Emc was overexpressed (EmcOE) using elavC155-Gal4 driver. As a control, elavC155-Gal4 and reporter construct containing flies were crossed to white* flies (control; min-luc and control;12xE-box-min-luc). c, Results of the luciferase reporter assay. Luciferase activities were measured and shown as fold change compared with the control, the replicates are shown as individual shapes, and error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM); n = 4, two-tailed Student’s paired t test.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Widespread transcriptional changes after pan-neuronal Da inhibition by Emc. a, Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the brains of EmcOE (elavC155-Gal4 > emc) flies compared with the control (elavC155-Gal4xwhite*). On x-axis, fold changes are shown in log2 scale, and on y-axis adjusted p values (BH normalization, DESeq2) are shown in −log10 scale. Dotted lines represent cutoff values for ±0.2 log2 fold change and 0.05 adj. p value. Significantly upregulated and downregulated genes are listed in Extended Data Figure 3-1. Levels of emc, da, and Class 2 bHLH protein mRNAs are shown in Extended Data Figure 3-2. b, Summary of DEGs from the RNA-seq experiment, above and below zero, indicates up- and downregulated genes, respectively. c, GO terms and (d) Reactome Pathway defined pathways dysregulated by Emc overexpression; color gradient represents adjusted p values; red and blue indicate up- and downregulated gene cohorts, respectively. Biological processes affected by Da inhibition are shown in Extended Data Figure 3-3 and Reactome Pathways in Extended Data Figure 3-4.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Pathways directly regulated by Da. a, Visualization of anti-FLAG ChIP-seq data from adult Drosophila heads of 3xFLAG-Da and control flies and RNA-seq data from adult brains of EmcOE (elavC155-Gal4 > emc) flies compared with control (elavC155-Gal4xwhite*) flies. ChIP-Seq data were visualized as fold enrichment over input and RNA-Seq data as counts per million aligned reads. Biological replicates were merged for visualization, with n = 2 for ChIP-Seq and n = 4 for RNA-Seq. As an example, stripe (sr) gene locus is shown, where 3xFLAG-Da binds to the promoter regions, and expression in RNA-Seq is lower in EmcOE. b, Venn diagram of common statistically significant genes from 3xFLAG-Da ChIP-seq and EmcOE RNA-seq datasets. For 3xFLAG-Da ChIP-seq, statistically significant genes were defined as log2 fold change > 1 (compared with white*) and false discovery rate ≤ 0.05. For EmcOE RNA-seq, statistically significant genes were determined as follows: counts ≥20 at least in control or EmcOE samples, log2 fold change >0.2 or <−0.2 and p-adjusted values ≤ 0.05. Genes that were upregulated or downregulated by Emc overexpression and that contained FLAG-Da ChIP peaks are listed in Extended Data Figure 4-1. c, GO terms and (d) Reactome Pathway terms for common genes. Color gradient represents adjusted p values (BH); red and blue indicate up- and downregulated gene cohorts in the RNA-seq data, respectively. Biological processes directly regulated by Da are shown in Extended Data Figure 4-2 and Reactome Pathways in Extended Data Figure 4-3.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Appetitive associative learning is impaired in adult Drosophila with pan-neuronal Da inhibition by Emc. Performance index of 1-d-old EmcOE (elavC155-Gal4 > emc) flies is significantly reduced compared with control (elavC155-Gal4xwhite*) flies (a), and performance index of daRNAi (nSyb-Gal4 > daRNAi) flies is significantly reduced compared with control (nSyb-Gal4xwhite*) flies (e). Preference index toward MCH is shown on b and f, OCT (3-octanol) on c and g, and sucrose on d and h. Performance and preference indexes are visualized using box-whisker plots that show the median, the 25% and 75% quartiles (hinges); the upper whisker extends from the hinge to the largest value no further than 1.5 of the interquartile range from the hinge; the lower whisker extends from the hinge to the smallest value at most 1.5 * interquartile range of the hinge, individual data points are presented as small dots; n = 12 for a and e; n = 8 for b, c, d, f, g, and h. p values were calculated using two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Expression patterns of pan-neuronal Gal4 drivers used are shown in Extended Data Figure 5-1.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Inhibiting Da in the adult brains after pupariation does not significantly effect memory of the flies. a, Performance index of ts-Gal80;elavC155-Gal4 > emc flies starved in 29°C for 24 h is not significantly changed compared with flies starved in 18°C. Performance indexes are visualized using box-whisker plots that show the median, the 25% and 75% quartiles (hinges); the upper whisker extends from the hinge to the largest value no further than 1.5 of the interquartile range from the hinge; the lower whisker extends from the hinge to the smallest value at most 1.5 * interquartile range of the hinge; individual data points are presented as small dots; n = 12 p value was calculated using two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. b, qPCR results of cDNA from ts-Gal80;elavC155-Gal4 > emc flies kept in 29 or 18°C for 24 h. Relative emc mRNA levels were calculated and shown in fold change compared with flies in 18°C. Replicates are shown as individual shapes, and error bars indicate SEM; n = 3, two-tailed Student’s paired t test.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Effects of neuronal Emc overexpression and Da overexpression on translation rates in adult Drosophila brain. a, Representative Western blot experiment of brains of 3–4-h-old flies treated with 5 µM puromycin for 1 h to label de novo synthesized proteins and detected using Western blot analysis (Anti-Puromycin); Coomassie staining was used for normalization; numbers on the left represent molecular weight in kilodalton; control, elavC155-Gal4xwhite*; DaOE, elavC155-Gal4 > Da; EmcOE, elavC155-Gal4 > Emc. b, Results of densitometric analysis of Western blot. The puromycin signals were normalized using Coomassie signals. The mean results from four independent experiments are shown. Results are presented as relative fold change against control, the replicates are shown as individual shapes, and error bars indicate SEM; *p < 0.05; ns, not significant; two-tailed Student's paired t test.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Figure 1-1

    FLAG-Da ChIP-seq results. Peaks that were significantly enriched in 3xFLAG-Da samples compared to white* samples are listed. Genomic location, annotation, gene related to the location, normalized counts, enrichment fold, FDR and p value are shown for each enriched peak. Download Figure 1-1, XLS file.

  • Figure 3-1

    Differential gene expression caused by Da inhibition by Emc overexpression. Significantly up-regulated and down-regulated genes are listed. Gene name, average counts and counts in each genotype, log2 fold change and adjusted p values are shown. Download Figure 3-1, XLS file.

  • Figure 3-2

    Expression of Da and its dimerization partners in the adult brains when Emc is overexpressed. Normalized counts of emc, da, l(1)sc, sc, ac, ase, cato, ato, amos, tap, twi, nau, HLH54F, hand, CG33557, Fer1, Fer2, Fer3, oli, net, tx, sage, dim, HLH3B and HLH4C are shown from Emc overexpression RNA-seq experiments. Classification is based on Ledent and Vervoort, 2001, and Massari and Murre, 2000. EmcOE – elavC155-Gal4 > emc, Control – elavC155-Gal4xwhite*. The replicates are shown as individual shapes and error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM). ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant; Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (BH) -adjusted p-values. Download Figure 3-2, TIF file.

  • Figure 3-3

    Biological processes affected by Da inhibition by Emc overexpression. Gene ontology analysis was conducted on differentially expressed genes caused by Emc overexpression and biological processes affected are listed. Description of the categories, genes ID-s of differentially expressed genes belonging to the categories, p values, adjusted p values and q values are shown. Download Figure 3-3, XLS file.

  • Figure 3-4

    Reactome pathways affected by Da inhibition by Emc overexpression. Gene ontology analysis was conducted on differentially expressed genes caused by Emc overexpression and Reactome pathways affected are listed. Description of the categories, genes ID-s of differentially expressed genes belonging to the categories, p values, adjusted p values and q values are shown. Download Figure 3-4, XLS file.

  • Figure 4-1

    Da target genes. Genes that were up-regulated or down-regulated by Emc overexpression and that contained FLAG-Da ChIP peaks are listed. Gene name, average counts and counts in each genotype, log2 fold change and adjusted p values are shown. Additionally, peaks that were significantly enriched in 3xFLAG-Da samples compared to white* samples and are related to genes that were differentially expressed by Emc overexpression are listed. Genomic location, annotation, gene related to the location, normalized counts, enrichment fold, FDR and p value are shown for each enriched peak. Download Figure 4-1, XLS file.

  • Figure 4-2

    Biological processes regulated by Da target genes. Gene ontology analysis was conducted on the Da target gene data set and biological processes affected are listed. Description of the categories, genes ID-s of differentially expressed genes belonging to the categories, p values, adjusted p values and q values are shown. Download Figure 4-2, XLS file.

  • Figure 4-3

    Reactome pathways regulated by Da target genes. Gene ontology analysis was conducted on the Da target gene data set and Reactome pathways affected are listed. Description of the categories, genes ID-s of differentially expressed genes belonging to the categories, p values, adjusted p values and q values are shown. Download Figure 4-3, XLS file.

  • Figure 5-1

    Expression of 3xFLAG-Da, elavC155-Gal4 and nSyb-Gal4 in the adult Drosophila brain. (a) and (g) show 3xFLAG-Da expression in the dorsal part of the brain, (d) and (j) show 3xFLAG-Da expression in the ventral part of the brain in magenta; nls-GFP expression shows the expression pattern of the drivers in green – (b) – elavC155-Gal4 dorsal part of the brain, (e) – elavC155-Gal4 ventral part of the brain, (h) – nSyb-Gal4 dorsal part of the brain, (k) - nSyb-Gal4 ventral part of the brain; on (c), (f), (i) and (l) 3xFLAG-Da and the driver’s signals are merged. White arrows point to some co-expression. Download Figure 5-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 13 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 13, Issue 1
January 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The E-Protein Daughterless Regulates Olfactory Learning of Adult Drosophila melanogaster
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The E-Protein Daughterless Regulates Olfactory Learning of Adult Drosophila melanogaster
Laura Tamberg, Carl Sander Kiir, Jürgen Tuvikene, Käthy Rannaste, Mari Palgi, Indrek Koppel, Tõnis Timmusk
eNeuro 7 January 2026, 13 (1) ENEURO.0051-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0051-25.2025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The E-Protein Daughterless Regulates Olfactory Learning of Adult Drosophila melanogaster
Laura Tamberg, Carl Sander Kiir, Jürgen Tuvikene, Käthy Rannaste, Mari Palgi, Indrek Koppel, Tõnis Timmusk
eNeuro 7 January 2026, 13 (1) ENEURO.0051-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0051-25.2025
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Data Availability
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • ChIP sequencing
  • Daughterless
  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • E-protein
  • memory
  • transcriptomics

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
  • Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.