Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices

Yaoda Xu
eNeuro 5 June 2025, 12 (7) ENEURO.0162-25.2025; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0162-25.2025
Yaoda Xu
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yaoda Xu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental design and example brain regions of interest (ROIs). A, Example trials showing the trial sequence. In each trial, a single target is shown; after an extended delay period filled with either a blank screen or a sequential presentation of exemplars of another object, a probe is shown. The probe was either an exact match or a different exemplar of the same object type. The entire image set is available from the online data deposit. B, The four types of objects used. C, Example ROIs shown on the inflated cortical surfaces. Reproduced from Vaziri-Pashkam and Xu (2019). D, Decoding accuracies during the VWM delay period for targets in trials without and with distractors and for distractors. The colored symbols above the bars mark the decoding significance of each bar compared with chance (0.5). Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05, **0.01 < p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Cross-distractor decoding of VWM targets for trials with distractors. A, An illustration of within-target and cross-distractor target decoding during the delay period. A classifier was either trained by VWM targets or by distractors to decode VWM targets. The distractors during VWM target training and the targets during distractor training were matched (e.g., couches in the examples shown). See Extended Data Figure 2-1 for additional results showing that the same results were obtained regardless of whether or not the irrelevant object remained the same or different in distractor training and target testing. B, Results of A for all the ROIs (left) and the three ROI sectors (right). C, Same as A, except target training and decoding occurred during the encoding period. Distractor training still occurred during the delay period. D, Results of C for all the ROIs (left) and the three ROI sectors (right). E, Cross-decoding ratios for both types of cross-decoding for all the ROIs. F, The same results as in E for the three ROI sectors. In B and D, the colored symbols above the bars mark the decoding significance of each bar compared with chance (0.5). The black symbols right above the colored symbols mark the significance of decoding drop between within and cross-decoding. In E and F, the colored symbols above the bars mark the significance of the ratio compared with 1. The black symbols right above the colored symbols mark the significance of the ratio difference between the two types of cross-decoding. In B, D, and F, the black symbols above the brackets mark the significance of the difference in either cross-decoding drop (B and D) or ratio for the two types of cross-decoding (F) between pairs of ROI sectors. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05, **0.01 < p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Comparing cross-distractor decoding of VWM targets for trials with and without distractors. A, An illustration of within-target and cross-distractor target decoding during the delay period for trials with distractors (same as in Fig. 2A). B, Same as A, but for trials without distractors. C, Results of A and B, plotted for separately each ROI. D, Same as C, for the three ROI sectors. In C and D, the colored symbols above the bars mark the decoding significance of each bar compared with chance (0.5). The black symbols above the colored symbols mark the significance of the decoding drop between within and cross-decoding. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05, **0.01 < p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Within and cross-decoding between VWM encoding and delay periods. A, An illustration of within and cross-decoding between encoding and delay periods for trials with distractors. B, Results of A for all the ROIs (left) and the three ROI sectors (right). C, An illustration of within and cross-decoding between encoding and delay periods for trials without distractors. D, Results of C for all the ROIs (left) and the three ROI sectors (right). E, Cross-decoding ratios for both types of trials for all the ROIs. F, The same results for the three ROI sectors. In B and D, the colored symbols above the bars mark the decoding significance of each bar compared with chance (0.5). The black symbols right above the colored symbols mark the significance of decoding drop between within and cross-decoding. In E and F, the colored symbols above the lines/bars mark the significance of the ratio compared with 1. The black symbols right above the colored symbols mark the significance of the ratio difference between the two types of trials. In B, D, and F, the black symbols above the brackets mark the significance of the difference in either cross-decoding drop (B and D) or overall ratio (F) between pairs of ROI sectors. Error bars indicate SEM. *p < 0.05, **0.01 < p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Repeated measures ANOVA results for the individual ROIs for trial type (trials with vs without distractors), decoding (within vs cross-decoding), and their interaction

    ROITrial type (F/p)Decoding (F/p)Interaction (F/p)ROITrial type (F/p)Decoding (F/p)Interaction (F/p)
    V10.05/0.8317.81/0.0011.64/0.22V3a1.73/0.213.14/0.0990.38/0.55
    V20.15/0.7019.44/<0.0011.87/0.19V3b0.03/0.874.47/0.0546.20/0.027
    V30.87/0.374.69/0.0493.51/0.083IPS00.12/0.749.18/0.00970.048/0.83
    V40.43/0.521.19/0.302.36/0.15IPS12.91/0.1110.47/0.0065<0.001/0.98
    LOT2.18/0.164.53/0.0531.08/0.32IPS21.92/0.194.53/0.0530.72/0.41
    VOT1.97/0.184.25/0.0591.16/0.30IPS30.27/0.617.78/0.0150.87/0.37
    IPS40.12/0.746.52/0.0240.11/0.75
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Repeated measures ANOVA results for the three ROI sectors for trial type (trials with vs without distractors, decoding (within vs cross-decoding), and their interaction

    ROITrial type (F/p)Decoding (F/p)Interaction (F/p)
    V1–V40.05/0.828.63/0.0123.24/0.095
    LOT/VOT0.0062/0.945.22/0.0400.019/0.89
    IPS2–IPS41.14/0.307.74/0.0160.082/0.78

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Figure 2-1

    Training distractors to decode targets in trials with distractors. A. The irrelevant object was the same across training and test (e.g., training on A vs. B when they were distractors with C being the target in both to decode A vs. B when they were targets with C being the distractor in both). B. The irrelevant object differed across training and test (e.g., training on A vs. B when they were distractors with C being the target in both to decode A vs. B when they were targets with D being the distractor in both). Error bars indicate s.e. * p < .05, ** .01 < p < .001, *** p < .001. Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 12 (7)
eNeuro
Vol. 12, Issue 7
July 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Yaoda Xu
eNeuro 5 June 2025, 12 (7) ENEURO.0162-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0162-25.2025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Transformed Visual Working Memory Representations in Human Occipitotemporal and Posterior Parietal Cortices
Yaoda Xu
eNeuro 5 June 2025, 12 (7) ENEURO.0162-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0162-25.2025
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Data Availability
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • fMRI
  • occipitotemporal cortex
  • posterior parietal cortex
  • vision
  • visual object representation
  • visual short-term memory
  • visual working memory

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Pairing mouse social and aversive stimuli across sexes does not produce social aversion in females
  • Serotonergic suppression of sustained synaptic responses in rat oculomotor neural integrator networks
  • Intrinsic cell-class-specific modulation of intracellular chloride levels and inhibitory function, in cortical networks, between day and night.
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Pairing mouse social and aversive stimuli across sexes does not produce social aversion in females
  • In-vivo analysis of medial perforant path-evoked excitation and inhibition in dentate granule cells
  • Altered Dopamine Signaling in Extinction-Deficient Mice
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.