Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Action Intentions Reactivate Representations of Task-Relevant Cognitive Cues

Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, Adrian Nestor and Matthias Niemeier
eNeuro 9 June 2025, 12 (6) ENEURO.0041-25.2025; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0041-25.2025
Nina Lee
1Department of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lin Lawrence Guo
1Department of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lin Lawrence Guo
Adrian Nestor
1Department of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Adrian Nestor
Matthias Niemeier
1Department of Psychology at Scarborough, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Ontario M1C1A4, Canada
2Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Ontario M4N3M6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Matthias Niemeier
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Experimental methods. A, Experimental setup. B, Timeline of a trial. C, Objects used in the experiment. D, Action conditions.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Classification accuracy of main effects and Shape ∩ Color during Preview. A, Time-resolved classification of effects aligned to Preview onset. Darker curves represent classification of grasping data, and the lighter ones represent knuckling data. Black curves in the third graph show performance as predicted by the respective two single-feature classifiers for grasping (solid curves) and knuckling (dotted curves). Horizontal colored bars denote significantly above chance classification (cluster-corrected t tests, one-tailed; p < 0.05). B, Electrode informativeness for respective effects aligned to Preview (two-tailed one-sample t test; q < 0.05). No Shape ∩ Color classifiers performed better than optimal additive models of single classifiers.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Temporal generalization of Color (A), Shape (B), Shape ∩ Color (C), and difference plots of Shape ∩ Color versus additive models of Shape and Color (D) aligned to Preview onset. Left side, Time-by-time plots for grasping (first plot), knuckling (second plot), and the difference of the grasping and knuckling plots (third plot). Black pixels in the time-by-time plots in columns 1 and 2 mark the contours of significant clusters (cluster-based sign-permutation test with cluster-defining and cluster-size thresholds of p < 0.01). Top right graph, ROIs as defined based on Lee et al. (2024). The same ROIs are superimposed as black outlined rectangles and L-shaped areas onto the plots in the third column. Right side, Bar graphs depict observed differences between grasping and knuckling for the ROIs. Base, baseline ROI; Diag, diagonal ROI; Arms, “arms”-shaped ROI; Tri, triangular ROI. Error bars represent bootstrapped one-tailed confidence intervals (10,000 iterations, one-tailed). Dashed lines visualize the upper boundary of the confidence interval for the baseline ROI. Asterisks represent significant results relative to baseline ROI.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Temporal generalization of Grasp Orientation. Black pixels in the time-by-time plots in columns 1 and 2 mark the contours of significant clusters (cluster-based sign-permutation test with cluster-defining and cluster-size thresholds of p < 0.01).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Time frequency analysis of Color and Shape representations aligned to Preview. Time-resolved plots of Shape and Color classification for time frequency data within separate frequency bands for Color (A) and Shape (B). Darker curves, grasping data; lighter curves, knuckling data. Horizontal colored bars represent above-chance classification accuracies (cluster-corrected t test, one-tailed; p < 0.05). Gray horizontal bars denote significantly better classification for grasping compared with knuckling (cluster-corrected t test, one-tailed; p < 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Temporal generalization of time frequency data for Grasping versus Knuckling differences for Color and Shape representations aligned to Preview. A, Color classification for beta, (B) Color classification for theta, and (C) Shape classification for theta. The outlines of the ROIs used to calculate classification differences between grasping and knuckling have been superimposed in black. Bar graphs depict differences between grasping and knuckling for the predefined ROIs based on Figure 3. Rightmost bar graph depicts differences between grasping and knuckling for theta color classification when “arms”-shaped ROIs are shifted 50 ms earlier (90–160 ms). Base, baseline ROI; Diag, diagonal ROI; Arms, “arms”-shaped ROI; Tri, triangular ROI. Error bars represent bootstrapped confidence intervals (10,000 iterations, one-tailed). Horizontal dashed lines visualize significance level (i.e., the upper boundary of the confidence interval for the baseline ROI). Asterisks represent significant results relative to baseline ROI.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Participant difference scores between Grasping and Knuckling classification accuracies for “arms”-shaped ROIs for (from left to right): Col: ERP, Color classifier trained on ERP data; Col: beta, Color classifier trained on beta band data; Shp: theta, Shape classifier trained on theta band data.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 12 (6)
eNeuro
Vol. 12, Issue 6
June 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Action Intentions Reactivate Representations of Task-Relevant Cognitive Cues
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Action Intentions Reactivate Representations of Task-Relevant Cognitive Cues
Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, Adrian Nestor, Matthias Niemeier
eNeuro 9 June 2025, 12 (6) ENEURO.0041-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0041-25.2025

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Action Intentions Reactivate Representations of Task-Relevant Cognitive Cues
Nina Lee, Lin Lawrence Guo, Adrian Nestor, Matthias Niemeier
eNeuro 9 June 2025, 12 (6) ENEURO.0041-25.2025; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0041-25.2025
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • beta band
  • grasping
  • memory
  • reaching
  • weight cues

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Individual Variation in Intrinsic Neuronal Properties of Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Medium Spiny Neurons in Male Rats Prone to Sign- or Goal-Track
  • Altered PI3K/mTOR signaling within the forebrain leads to respiratory deficits in a mouse model of epilepsy
  • In-vivo analysis of medial perforant path-evoked excitation and inhibition in dentate granule cells
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Spatially Extensive LFP Correlations Identify Slow-Wave Sleep in Marmoset Sensorimotor Cortex
  • What Is the Difference between an Impulsive and a Timed Anticipatory Movement?
  • Odor Experience Stabilizes Glomerular Output Representations in Two Mouse Models of Autism
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.