Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Sex-Specific Age-Related Changes in Excitatory and Inhibitory Intracortical Circuits in Mouse Primary Auditory Cortex

Zheng Xu, Binghan Xue, Joseph P. Y. Kao and Patrick O. Kanold
eNeuro 3 December 2024, 12 (2) ENEURO.0378-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0378-24.2024
Zheng Xu
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20215
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Binghan Xue
2Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph P. Y. Kao
3Center for Biomedical Engineering and Technology, and Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick O. Kanold
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 20215
2Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Patrick O. Kanold
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Photoexcitability of A1 neurons remains unchanged during aging. A, Schematic of thalamocortical slicing. Slices were cut ∼15° from the horizontal plane to maintain the tonotopic organization in the slice. B, Left, Schematic of LSPS for cell-attached recording. Solid pink triangle represents recorded neuron. Middle, Infrared image of brain slice with patch pipette on L2/3 neuron. Stimulation grid is indicated by blue dots. Layer boundaries are indicated by white bars on the right. The scale bar at the bottom left is 200 μm. Right, Magnified infrared image with pipette patching a L2/3 pyramidal neuron. The scale bar at the bottom right is 15 μm. C, Relative position of recorded neurons within L2/3 relative to the borders of L4 and L1 (100%). Cells were sampled from a similar area in the middle of L2/3 in young adult and aged animals. D, E, Number of evoked action potentials (C) and effective stimulation distance (D) from cell-attached recordings of L2/3, L4 and L5/6 neurons. The numbers of evoked action potentials of neurons in all layers were similar and most spikes were evoked within 150 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Sex-specific changes in excitatory connections to A1 L2/3 neurons in aged male mice. A, Schematic of LSPS when recording evoked EPSCs. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were obtained from pink cell at a holding potential of −70 mV (EPSCs). If the presynaptic excitatory neuron (e.g., yellow cells) synapses on the recorded neuron, an EPSC will be observed. Shown on the right are examplar patch-clamp recordings of direct response (pink) and EPSCs (yellow), acquired at the holding potential of −70 mV. Black vertical line indicates time of photostimulation; shaded gray box labels the time window of evoked responses. B, Left, Schematic illustration of how the connection probability map is calculated. Connection maps from recorded neurons are aligned to the soma location and averaged to create the connection probability map. Right, Maps of connection probability for excitatory connections in young adult (left) and aged (right) animals. Soma location is indicated by the white circle. Connection probability is encoded according to the pseudocolor scale. White horizontal lines indicate averaged laminar borders and are 100 μm long. C, Left, Distributions of the area of excitatory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. Middle, Distributions of the area of excitatory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. Right, Distributions of the area of excitatory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. *pKS < 0.05; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. D, Left, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. Middle, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. Right, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Sex-specific changes of connection strength and percentage inputs to A1 L2/3 neurons in aged mice. A, Left, Distributions of mean EPSC charge of inputs originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. $pRank-sum < 0.05. Middle, Distribution of mean charge of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. **pKS < 0.01; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. Right, Distribution of mean charge of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. *pKS < 0.05; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. B, Left, Distributions of mean EPSC amplitude of inputs originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. Middle, Distribution of mean amplitude of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. Right, Distribution of mean amplitude of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. C, Left, Distributions of fraction of total excitatory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. *pKS < 0.05. Middle, Distributions of fraction of total excitatory input to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. *pKS < 0.05. Right, Distributions of fraction of total excitatory input to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Sex-specific changes in inhibitory connections to A1 L2/3 neurons in aged male mice. A, Schematic of LSPS when recording evoked IPSCs. Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were obtained from pink cell at holding potentials of 0 mV (IPSCs). If the presynaptic inhibitory neuron (e.g., green cells) synapses on the recorded neuron, an IPSC will be observed. Shown on the right are examplar patch-clamp recordings of IPSCs (green), acquired at the holding potential of 0 mV. Black vertical line indicates time of photostimulation; shaded gray box labels the time window of evoked responses. B, Average maps of connection probability for inhibitory connections in young adult (left) and aged (right) animals. Maps are aligned to the soma location (white circle). Connection probability is encoded according to the pseudocolor scale. White horizontal lines indicate averaged laminar borders and are 100 μm long. C, Left, Distributions of the area of inhibitory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. *pKS < 0.05; $$pRank-sum < 0.01. Middle, Distributions of the area of inhibitory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. Right, Distributions of the area of inhibitory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. *pKS < 0.05; **pKS < 0.01; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05; ##pKruskal–Wallis < 0.01. D, Left, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. *pKS < 0.05. Middle, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. Right, Integration distance to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals. *pKS < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Inhibitory connection strength and percentage of inhibitory inputs originating from each layer remain unchanged between young and aged animals. A, Left, Distributions of mean IPSC charge of inputs originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. **pKS < 0.01; ###pKruskal–Wallis < 0.001. Middle, Distribution of mean charge of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. Right, Distribution of mean charge of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. **pKS < 0.01; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. B, Left, Distributions of mean IPSC amplitude of inputs originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. $pRank-sum < 0.05. Middle, Distributions of mean amplitude of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. *pKS < 0.05. Right, Distributions of fraction of mean amplitude of inputs to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals. *pKS < 0.05; **pKS < 0.01; #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. C, Left, Distributions of fraction of total inhibitory input originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. Middle, Distributions of fraction of total inhibitory input to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. Right, Distributions of fraction of total inhibitory input to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Aged female animals show altered E/I ratio. A, Left, Distributions of E/I based on input numbers (density) from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult (light green) or aged (dark green) animals. *pKS < 0.05. Middle, Distributions of E/I based on input numbers (density) to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female (light pink) or aged female (dark pink) animals. *pKS < 0.05. Right, Distributions of E/I based on input numbers (density) from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male (light blue) or aged male (dark blue) animals. B, Left, Distributions of E/I based on transferred charge originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of young adult or aged animals. Middle, Distributions of E/I based on transferred charge to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult female or aged female animals. Right, Distributions of E/I based on transferred charge to each L2/3 cell originating from L2/3 (top), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (bottom) of adult male or aged male animals.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Circuit similarity decreased in aged mice. Fano factors (variance/mean) for excitatory connection maps of adult (left), aged (middle), and the differences between adult and aged (right). The Fano factor is represented in pseudocolor. The smaller the Fano factor, the greater the similarity in the population. In the maps, white represents areas where the probability of the connections was <5% and a Fano factor was not calculated. A, Fano factors for the excitatory connection maps. B, Fano factors for the inhibitory connection maps.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Decreased similarity of input maps in aged mice. A, Schematic illustration of how pairwise correlation between two maps is calculated. Filled white circle represents recorded neuron. A yellow square represents a stimulus location that has monosynaptic connection to the recorded cell; a blue square represents a location with no connection to the recorded cell. For the pairwise correlation calculation, yellow and blue squares are assigned values of 1 and 0, respectively. B, Correlation of excitatory and inhibitory circuit patterns across all layers. Left, Correlation of circuit patterns for all adult (light green) and aged (dark green) animals. $$$pRank-sum < 0.001. Middle, Correlation of circuit patterns for adult female (light pink) and aged female (dark pink) animals. Right, Correlation of circuit patterns for adult male (light blue) and aged male (dark blue) animals. #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05; ###pKruskal–Wallis < 0.001. C, Correlation of circuit patterns within L2/3 (left), L4 (middle), and L5/6 (right). Left, Circuit similarity from different layers in adult and aged animals. $$$pRank-sum < 0.001. Middle, Circuit similarity from different layers in adult and aged female animals. #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05. Right, Circuit similarity from different layers in adult and aged male animals. #pKruskal–Wallis < 0.05; ##pKruskal–Wallis < 0.01; ###pKruskal–Wallis < 0.001.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of changes for excitatory connections

    ExcitationAdultAgedp values
    Input area (μm2)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/31.84 × 1041.60 × 1042.23 × 1041.68 × 1040.680.57
    L47.96 × 1033.20 × 1036.37 × 1032.40 × 1030.960.97
    L5/61.04 × 1043.20 × 1031.00 × 1044.80 × 1030.490.19
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/31.97 × 1041.60 × 1043.31 × 1042.88 × 1040.0250.14
    L47.92 × 1031.60 × 1031.09 × 1048.00 × 1030.210.74
    L5/61.06 × 1041.60 × 1031.47 × 1048.80 × 1030.0410.011
    MaleL2/31.73 × 1041.44 × 1041.30 × 1041.20 × 1040.441.0
    L48.00 × 1034.80 × 1032.46 × 1031.60 × 1030.220.16
    L5/61.02 × 1044.80 × 1035.94 × 1033.20 × 1030.251.0
    Integration distance (μm)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/3191.1174.5198.6210.00.170.23
    L4113.0100.0124.598.00.960.53
    L5/6191.9214.1223.1272.00.360.30
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/3191.1165.1231.6228.00.0790.43
    L4111.096.5180.7200.00.0980.30
    L5/6198.6248.4261.2302.30.121.00
    MaleL2/3191.1189.9172.9173.00.361.00
    L4114.7100.080.60.00.351.00
    L5/6186.2196.7193.3234.10.871.00
    Mean charge (pC)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/31.281.260.951.120.260.078
    L40.540.950.420.590.0740.023
    L5/60.450.380.440.390.990.94
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/31.181.091.181.280.861.00
    L40.701.110.650.640.0040.021
    L5/60.530.540.560.370.440.51
    MaleL2/31.351.280.770.860.0280.025
    L40.400.640.240.460.141.00
    L5/60.380.350.350.400.631.00
    Mean amplitude (pA)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/328.5528.5728.0830.480.810.57
    L417.1330.3819.9428.950.560.78
    L5/618.2123.1522.3825.110.960.73
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/327.7327.6335.4231.010.191.00
    L418.6533.5927.5027.820.301.00
    L5/618.8527.7227.8226.750.461.00
    MaleL2/329.2529.4822.3429.540.761.00
    L415.8525.3614.0332.010.591.00
    L5/617.9823.0918.1321.610.701.00
    Fractional input area (%)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/363.5063.1560.1360.000.0760.64
    L416.8010.8012.0012.500.220.53
    L5/619.7113.2727.8822.220.0470.085
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/366.4161.2962.8660.610.0461.00
    L418.0912.5015.9816.780.211.00
    L5/615.5012.5021.1520.940.0280.74
    MaleL2/360.8465.0057.7056.760.831.00
    L415.619.098.455.000.470.93
    L5/623.5521.4333.8530.000.891.00
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Summary of changes for inhibitory connections

    InhibitionAdultAgedp values
    Input area (μm2)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/37.90 × 1047.20 × 1046.71 × 1045.52 × 1040.0420.12
    L41.60 × 1041.44 × 1041.15 × 1048.00 × 1030.0460.007
    L5/64.27 × 1043.68 × 1043.62 × 1042.96 × 1040.180.19
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/38.23 × 1048.32 × 1049.16 × 1048.64 × 1040.951.00
    L41.65 × 1041.44 × 1041.68 × 1041.28 × 1040.691.00
    L5/63.77 × 1043.36 × 1044.87 × 1044.48 × 1040.650.91
    MaleL2/37.61 × 1046.72 × 1044.77 × 1044.48 × 1040.0030.031
    L41.56 × 1041.44 × 1047.28 × 1034.80 × 1030.0030.002
    L5/64.71 × 1044.88 × 1042.64 × 1041.76 × 1040.0290.030
    Integration distance (μm)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/3248.9244.7251.5275.90.0300.12
    L4270.4282.0233.3264.20.380.40
    L5/6311.7347.0280.8318.40.890.36
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/3257.3245.5262.5275.90.0921.00
    L4286.0299.2263.1298.00.941.00
    L5/6305.1301.1295.4335.40.661.00
    MaleL2/3241.7243.2242.9274.70.321.00
    L4257.1247.3210.1196.40.0391.00
    L5/6317.3357.1269.4317.30.260.94
    Mean charge (pC)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/35.646.064.764.610.170.27
    L42.451.971.320.930.0030.001
    L5/61.181.060.990.780.360.18
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/35.465.450.185.710.921.00
    L42.972.201.471.690.150.56
    L5/61.171.060.950.960.971.00
    MaleL2/35.796.534.033.850.0070.21
    L42.011.941.210.700.0040.002
    L5/61.201.051.030.720.220.87
    Mean amplitude (pA)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/382.5884.9378.6173.420.430.55
    L446.6438.9231.1231.970.110.034
    L5/629.2030.5527.1828.700.620.72
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/376.4983.7798.7598.110.300.86
    L452.1736.8437.4839.910.801.00
    L5/627.3228.4928.5134.500.0460.42
    MaleL2/387.7290.2862.8862.880.0800.055
    L441.9639.3226.1526.150.0320.094
    L5/630.7930.7026.1426.140.0090.047
    Fractional percentage input area (%)MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testRanksum
    AllL2/356.6858.1460.7257.510.360.33
    L412.3510.299.449.730.150.083
    L5/630.9830.5629.8432.360.550.77
    MeanMedianMeanMedianKS testKruskal–Wallis
    FemaleL2/358.7358.1462.3758.230.131.00
    L413.1311.949.9010.810.481.00
    L5/628.1529.9327.7433.630.281.00
    MaleL2/354.8856.9559.4256.760.261.00
    L411.669.189.087.940.0781.00
    L5/633.4531.0431.5132.050.261.00
    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Summary of connection changes

    AreaDistanceCharge% input
    MFMFMFMF
    ExcitationL2/3o+oo−oo+
    L4ooooo−oo
    L5/6o+ooooo+
    InhibitionL2/3−ooooooo
    L4−ooo−ooo
    L5/6−ooooooo
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 12 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 12, Issue 2
February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex-Specific Age-Related Changes in Excitatory and Inhibitory Intracortical Circuits in Mouse Primary Auditory Cortex
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sex-Specific Age-Related Changes in Excitatory and Inhibitory Intracortical Circuits in Mouse Primary Auditory Cortex
Zheng Xu, Binghan Xue, Joseph P. Y. Kao, Patrick O. Kanold
eNeuro 3 December 2024, 12 (2) ENEURO.0378-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0378-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Sex-Specific Age-Related Changes in Excitatory and Inhibitory Intracortical Circuits in Mouse Primary Auditory Cortex
Zheng Xu, Binghan Xue, Joseph P. Y. Kao, Patrick O. Kanold
eNeuro 3 December 2024, 12 (2) ENEURO.0378-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0378-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aging
  • excitation
  • GABA
  • inhibition
  • primary auditory cortex
  • translaminar circuits

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Dynamic Encoding of Reward Prediction Error Signals in the Pigeon Ventral Tegmental Area during Reinforcement Learning
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.