Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Sex-Specific Contrasting Role of BECLIN-1 Protein in Pain Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behaviors

Fariya Zaheer, Gabriel J. Levine, Ana Leticia Simal, Seyed Reza Fatemi Tabatabaei, Tami A. Martino and Giannina Descalzi
eNeuro 14 January 2025, 12 (2) ENEURO.0244-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0244-24.2024
Fariya Zaheer
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gabriel J. Levine
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Gabriel J. Levine
Ana Leticia Simal
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana Leticia Simal
Seyed Reza Fatemi Tabatabaei
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
2Center for Cardiovascular Investigations, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Seyed Reza Fatemi Tabatabaei
Tami A. Martino
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
2Center for Cardiovascular Investigations, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giannina Descalzi
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Giannina Descalzi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Disruption of BECLIN-1 enhances mechanical pain hypersensitivity in male but not female mice in a mouse model of neuropathic pain. A, Von Frey measures expressed in grams of injured (ipsilateral) paw from female and male WT and Bcl2AAA mice exposed to SNI and (B) sham surgery. Male Bcl2AAA mice showed significantly lower mechanical thresholds at 7, 14, 21, and 28 d postinjury, compared with WT SNI mice, whereas female Bcl2AAA mice showed similar mechanical thresholds compared with WT SNI mice. No differences were observed in sham-treated mice. C, Von Frey measures of noninjured (contralateral) paw from female and male WT and Bcl2AAA mice exposed to SNI surgery. D, Quantification as percentage of allodynia by SNI (% allodynia) across time. Male Bcl2AAA mice displayed significantly greater levels of SNI-induced allodynia compared with WT mice, whereas no differences were detected between female Bcl2AAA and WT mice. E, % allodynia in female and male Bcl2AAA and WT mice. F, Quantification of total percent allodynia (area under the curve, AUC, from E). Three-way RM and one-way ANOVA, n = 12 per group; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Disruption of BECLIN-1 enhances thermal pain hypersensitivity in male but not female Bcl2AAA mice. A, Hot plate latency measures in female and male WT and Bcl2AAA naive mice; no differences were observed. B, Hot plate latency measures in female and male WT and Bcl2AAA mice exposed to SNI and sham surgery. Female and male WT and Bcl2AA mice exposed to SNI showed significantly shorter response latencies compared with sham controls. Male, but not female, Bcl2AAA mice showed significantly shorter response latencies compared with WT SNI mice. Three-way ANOVA, n = 10–15 per group; *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Disruption of BECLIN-1 prevents SNI-induced increases in anxiety-like behavior in the EPM in male mice. A, % time spent exploring the open arms of an EPM by SNI and sham-treated female and male WT and Bcl2AAA mice. Whereas male WT mice showed a significant reduction in open arm exploration compared with sham-treated mice, male Bcl2AAA mice showed no reductions in open arm exploration. B, Total entries displayed by mice in A. C, Representative heat maps of female (left) and male (right) mice exploration during EPM tests. Three-way ANOVA, n = 10–12 per group; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Disruption of BECLIN-1 prevents SNI-induced increases in anxiety-like behavior in the open field test in male mice. A, % time spent in the center area of an open field arena by female and male WT and Bcl2AAA SNI and sham-treated mice. Male SNI Bcl2AAA mice showed similar exploration time of the center area in the open field test compared with sham-treated controls. B, Total distance traveled by male WT and Bcl2AAA mice in an OFT 30–31 d after SNI and sham surgery. C, Representative heat maps of female (left) and male (right) mouse exploration during open field tests. Three-way ANOVA, n = 10–12 per group; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Beclin-1 expression in the anterior cingulate cortex does not change in response to SNI. No differences in expression levels of Beclin-1 RNA were observed in the ACC between groups. RNA expression levels were quantified through qRT-PCR. ACC tissue samples were collected from female and male WT SNI and sham-treated mice 31 d after SNI or sham procedures. One-way ANOVA, n = 5 per group.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Statistical analyses for the data in Figures 1–5

    Data structureType of testStatisticp-value
    Figure 1ANormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     TimeF(3.347, 147.3) = 283.8p < 0.001
     (Female vs male)F(1, 44) = 2.288p = 0.14
     (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 17.15p < 0.001
     Time × (female vs male)F(5, 220) = 1.081p = 0.37
     Time × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 3.895p = 0.002
     (Female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 2.454p = 0.12
     Time × (female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 1.172p = 0.32
    Figure 1BNormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     TimeF(4.139, 182.1) = 4.579p = 0.001
     (Female vs male)F(1, 44) = 0.08293p = 0.77
     (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 1.423p = 0.24
     Time × (female vs male)F(5, 220) = 0.8589p = 0.51
     Time × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 0.6759p = 0.64
     (Female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 0.1692p = 0.68
     Time × (female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 0.1891p = 0.97
    Figure 1CNormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     TimeF(5, 220) = 4.380p < 0.001
     (Female vs male)F(1, 44) = 0.01810p = 0.89
     (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 0.05027p = 0.82
     Time × (female vs male)F(5, 220) = 1.053p = 0.39
     Time × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 0.1713p = 0.97
     (Female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 2.059p = 0.16
     Time × (female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(5, 220) = 1.059p = 0.38
    Figure 1D,ENormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     TimeF(4, 176) = 55.66p < 0.001
     (Female vs male)F(1, 44) = 0.1896p = 0.67
     (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 37.92p < 0.001
     Time × (female vs male)F(4, 176) = 1.207p = 0.31
     Time × (WT vs BCL)F(4, 176) = 0.2075p = 0.93
     (Female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(1, 44) = 8.123p = 0.007
     Time × (female vs male) × (WT vs BCL)F(4, 176) = 0.2403p = 0.92
    Figure 1FNormal distributionOne-way ANOVAF(3, 76) = 3.746p = 0.01
    Figure 2ANormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     SexF(1, 90) = 18.70p < 0.001
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 90) = 1.734p = 0.191
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 90) = 0.07338p = 0.787
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 90) = 7.799p = 0.006
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 90) = 0.6937p = 0.407
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 90) = 0.2768p = 0.600
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 90) = 0.01009p = 0.920
    Figure 2BNormal distributionThree-way RM ANOVA
     SexF(1, 96) = 1.457p = 0.230
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 96) = 3.684p = 0.058
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 96) = 135.6p < 0.001
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 96) = 5.630p = 0.020
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 96) = 0.03694p = 0.848
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 96) = 1.294p = 0.258
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 96) = 0.4683p = 0.495
    Figure 3ANormal distributionThree-way ANOVA
     SexF(1, 79) = 3.007p = 0.087
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 79) = 8.180p = 0.005
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 23.96p < 0.001
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 79) = 1.719p = 0.194
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 0.04524p = 0.832
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 0.1233p = 0.726
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 2.325p = 0.131
    Figure 3BNormal distributionThree-way ANOVA
     SexF(1, 79) = 206.0p < 0.001
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 79) = 33.22p < 0.001
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 2.709p = 0.104
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 79) = 12.23p < 0.001
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 6.929p = 0.010
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 2.733p = 0.102
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 79) = 0.2839p = 0.596
    Figure 4ANormal distributionThree-way ANOVA
     SexF(1, 81) = 4.726p = 0.033
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 81) = 0.4593p = 0.500
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 11.41p = 0.001
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 81) = 0.9078p = 0.344
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 0.6091p = 0.437
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 6.308p = 0.014
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 0.1998p = 0.656
    Figure 4BNormal distributionThree-way ANOVA
     SexF(1, 81) = 15.31p < 0.001
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 81) = 0.4593p = 0.500
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 0.4492p = 0.505
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 81) = 0.6998p = 0.405
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 1.336p = 0.251
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 0.5748p = 0.451
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 81) = 0.03412p = 0.854
    Figure 5Normal distributionThree-way ANOVA
     SexF(1, 35) = 4.067p = 0.051
     (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 35) = 0.06186p = 0.805
     (Sham vs SNI)F(1, 35) = 0.3581p = 0.553
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2)F(1, 35) = 3.708p = 0.062
     Sex × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 35) = 3.467p = 0.071
     (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 35) = 0.1879p = 0.667
     Sex × (WT vs BCL2) × (sham vs SNI)F(1, 35) = 4.557p = 0.040
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 12 (2)
eNeuro
Vol. 12, Issue 2
February 2025
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex-Specific Contrasting Role of BECLIN-1 Protein in Pain Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behaviors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sex-Specific Contrasting Role of BECLIN-1 Protein in Pain Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behaviors
Fariya Zaheer, Gabriel J. Levine, Ana Leticia Simal, Seyed Reza Fatemi Tabatabaei, Tami A. Martino, Giannina Descalzi
eNeuro 14 January 2025, 12 (2) ENEURO.0244-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Sex-Specific Contrasting Role of BECLIN-1 Protein in Pain Hypersensitivity and Anxiety-Like Behaviors
Fariya Zaheer, Gabriel J. Levine, Ana Leticia Simal, Seyed Reza Fatemi Tabatabaei, Tami A. Martino, Giannina Descalzi
eNeuro 14 January 2025, 12 (2) ENEURO.0244-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0244-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anxiety
  • autophagy
  • BECLIN-1
  • female
  • neuropathic pain
  • sex differences

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • The speed of visual discrimination differs between foveola and perifovea: a combined EEG and behavioral investigation
  • Emotions in the brain are dynamic and contextually dependent: using music to measure affective transitions
  • Morphological and Molecular Distinctions of Parallel Processing Streams Reveal Two Koniocellular Pathways in the Tree Shrew dLGN
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Release of Extracellular Matrix Components after Human Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Gene variants related to primary familial brain calcification: perspectives from bibliometrics and meta-analysis
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.