Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Negative Results, Sensory and Motor Systems

Human NGF “Painless” Ocular Delivery for Retinitis Pigmentosa: An In Vivo Study

Debora Napoli, Noemi Orsini, Giulia Salamone, Maria Antonietta Calvello, Simona Capsoni, Antonino Cattaneo and Enrica Strettoi
eNeuro 18 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0096-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0096-24.2024
Debora Napoli
1CNR Neuroscience Institute, Pisa 56124, Italy
2Regional Doctorate School in Neuroscience, University of Florence, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Debora Napoli
Noemi Orsini
1CNR Neuroscience Institute, Pisa 56124, Italy
2Regional Doctorate School in Neuroscience, University of Florence, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giulia Salamone
1CNR Neuroscience Institute, Pisa 56124, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Antonietta Calvello
3Bio@SNS Laboratory of Biology, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simona Capsoni
4Section of Human Physiology, Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, Ferrara 44121, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonino Cattaneo
3Bio@SNS Laboratory of Biology, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy
5Rita Levi-Montalcini European Brain Research Institute (EBRI), Roma 00161, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Enrica Strettoi
1CNR Neuroscience Institute, Pisa 56124, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Enrica Strettoi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    rd10 mutant mice retinal phenotype. Vertical sections of the outer retina of a typical C57Bl6 mouse (A), compared with that from a rd10 mutant (B) near the peak of photoreceptor degeneration (50 d of age). The nicely elongated, regularly spaced cones visible in A after cone arrestin antibody staining (in red) have largely degenerated and remodeled into hypertrophic cells with short outer segments (arrows) in B. Nuclei are stained blue with DAPI. onl and inl, outer and inner nuclear layers, respectively.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Intravitreal delivery of hNGFp has a moderate effect on cone survival in RP mice. A, Experimental design used for the single intravitreal injection. The animals were divided into two groups as for the previous experiments, control (ctr) and hNGFp-treated (treat) and once intravitreal injected with PBS (ctr) or hNGFp (treat) at age P50; hNGFp dosage, 0.54 ng/gr. B, Whole-mount retinas of control (left) and treated mice (right) stained with cone arrestin (red signal). The dotted lines define the degenerated area. C, qPCR quantification of genes involved in photoreceptors survival and microglial activation. Gnat2 (ctr = 8, treat = 9; p = 0.050) and Arr3 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.184) are genes expressed in rods and cones, ntrk1 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; val = 0.003) is the gene for trkA expression while ngfr (ctr = 8, treat = 9; p = 0.327) is the one for p75NTR receptor expression. Gfap (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.749) refers to macroglial activation while tmem119 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.007) represent the activation of microglia. Arg1 (ctr = 8, treat = 9; p = 0.552) and nos2 (ctr = 8, treat = 9; p = 0.916) are, respectively, genes expressed by anti-/inflammatory and pro-/inflammatory microglia. Gene expression is reported as the ratio between the ctr and treat animals. Normalization was done on actin expression for each sample. D, Degenerated area quantification expressed as mm2 (ctr = 3, treat = 3; p = 0.153) and percentage (ctr = 3, treat = 3; p = 0.146) with respect to the total retinal area. E, Quantification of cone arrestin signal. Absolute cone number per retina (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.835); cone density (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.723); and retinal area (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.729). Error bars are ±SEM. t test was used to compare the ctr versus treat mean for each experiment.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Retinal thickness is not rescued by intravitreal delivery of hNGFp in RP mice. A, B, Representative images of the ctr (left) and treated (right) retinal section used to measure the thickness of the ONL. C, D, zoom of retinal sections. E, Statistical analysis of ONL measurements shows no changes in thickness upon hNGFp administration (ctr = 4, treat = 5: p = 0.495). Error bars are ±SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Intravitreal delivery of hNGFp shows partial immunomodulation of retinal inflammation in RP mice. A, Whole-mount retinas of the control (left) and treated mice (right) stained with CD11b (green signal). The dotted lines define the degenerated area. A and B are zoom images of retinal microglia in the peripheral and central area (B) qPCR quantification of genes involved in inflammatory responses. Myd88 (ctr = 8, treat = 9; p = 0.019) and csf1 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.782) are transcriptional factors involved in the activation of pro- and anti-inflammatory response. Lamp2 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.0005) is a protein involved in the autophagy process. Nr3c1 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.002) codifies for glucocorticoid receptor expression. Ccl12 ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.250), ccl2 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.928) and cxcl5 (ctr = 5, treat = 6; p = 0.861) are chemokines and cytokines.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Increased dosage of hNGFp intravitreal delivered has no beneficial effects on cone survival and retinal inflammation of RP mice. A, Whole-mount retinas of control (left) and treated mice (right) stained with cone arrestin (red signal). The dotted lines define the degenerated area. B, qPCR quantification of genes involved in photoreceptors survival and microglial activation. Gnat2 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.042) and Arr3 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.486) are genes expressed in rods and cones, ntrk1 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.050) is the gene for trkA expression while ngfr (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.092) is the one for p75NTR receptor expression. Gfap (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.500) refers to macroglial activation while tmem119 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.270) represent the activation of microglia. Arg1 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.831) and nos2 (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.415) are genes expressed by microglial cells. C, Degenerated area quantification expressed as mm2 (ctr = 6, treat = 7; p = 0.698) and percentage (ctr = 6, treat = 7; p = 0.858) with respect to the total retinal area. D, Quantification of cone arrestin–positive cells. Absolute cone number per retina (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.221); cone density (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.316); and retinal area (ctr = 7, treat = 8; p = 0.519). Error bars are ±SEM. t test was used to compare the ctr versus treat mean for each experiment.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    wtNGF and hNGFp treatments show no differences in cone survival. Cone counts in retinal preparations from rd10 mice injected intravitreally with wtNGF (n = 4), hNGFp (n = 6), and control solution (n = 6). Error bars are ±SEM. One-way ANOVA test. p = 0.7087.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Intranasal delivery of hNGFp has no effect on cone rescue in RP mice. A, Graphical representation of the experimental protocol adopted for the treatment. The animals were divided into two groups, control (ctr) and hNGFp treated (treat), and manipulated for 1 week before the start of the experimental protocol. Finally, they were intranasally treated with drops of PBS (ctr) or hNGFp (treat) 3 d/week from age P25 to P45 (left panel) or P60 (right panel). hNGFp dosage, 0.54 ng/gr. B, C, Volcano plots of qPCR array show no changes of gene expression related to photoreceptor survival and the inflammatory pathway. The dots represent each tested gene with its mean fold change and the statistical value (-log10pval). The red and green dots are, respectively, the downregulated and upregulated genes in the treated animals with respect to the control mice. The dotted line represents the significance threshold [-log10(0.05) = 1.33.]. Volcano plot in B, N:(ctr = 7, treat = 7), and in C, N:(ctr = 6, treat = 6). D, Whole-mount image (left side) of a rd10 retina (aged P45) stained with cone arrestin (red signal) showing how the acquisition for cone counting was done. The 16 dotted squares represent the investigated retinal areas for each animal while the white squares in A and B show zoom images of central and peripheral cone arrestin signals. E, Quantification of cone arrestin signal. Absolute cone number per retina (ctr = 4, treat = 4; p = 0.399); cone density (ctr = 4, treat = 4; p = 0.582); and retinal area (ctr = 4, treat = 4; p = 0.781). Each dot represents a different animal. Error bars are ±SEM.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    RPE analysis after intranasal delivery of hNGFp does not demonstrate structural amelioration. The administration failed to elicit visible effects on the morphology of the RPE, here shown upon immunolabeling with antibodies against ZO-1, a protein of the RPE tight junctional complexes. The number of discontinuities in the ZO-1 array (arrows), which is high in rd10 mutants as a secondary effect of photoreceptor loss (A), was not rescued by hNGFp administration (B), as demonstrated by a quantitative analysis shown in C, where the number of intersections between ZO-1 profiles and a reference grid has been assessed systematically and compared statistically (t test; p = 0.62). Error bars are ±SEM. t test was used to compare the ctr versus treat mean for each experiment.

  • Figure 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 9.

    Biological action of the hNGFp used in this study. A, Basal forebrain coronal sections. ChAT immunofluorescence staining. The number of ChAT-positive profiles is visibly more numerous in the hNGFp-treated section (right), compared with the control. B, Cell counts on multiple sections show an approximate one-third increment in the number of ChAT-positive cells in hNGFp-treated samples (error bars are ±SEM. t test was used to compare the ctr vs treat mean for each experiment; **p ≤ 0.005).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Mice used for the study

    rd10 used in this studyIntravitreal IV hNGFp low dosage (0.54 5.4 ng/gr)CTR (saline)Intravitreal IV hNGFp high dosage (54 ng/gr)CTR (saline)Intravitreal IV NGF wt high dosage (54 ng/gr)CTR (saline)Intranasal hNGFp (0.54 ng/gr)CTR (saline)
    ICCH878*7*6644
    qRT-PCR988*7*1313
    • ↵*Numbers with an asterisk indicate mice whose eyes were used for multiple assays, i.e., for both ICCH and qRT-PCR.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (9)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 9
September 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Human NGF “Painless” Ocular Delivery for Retinitis Pigmentosa: An In Vivo Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Human NGF “Painless” Ocular Delivery for Retinitis Pigmentosa: An In Vivo Study
Debora Napoli, Noemi Orsini, Giulia Salamone, Maria Antonietta Calvello, Simona Capsoni, Antonino Cattaneo, Enrica Strettoi
eNeuro 18 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0096-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0096-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Human NGF “Painless” Ocular Delivery for Retinitis Pigmentosa: An In Vivo Study
Debora Napoli, Noemi Orsini, Giulia Salamone, Maria Antonietta Calvello, Simona Capsoni, Antonino Cattaneo, Enrica Strettoi
eNeuro 18 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0096-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0096-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • blindness
  • cell survival
  • inherited retinal degeneration
  • microglia
  • neurotrophic factors
  • photoreceptors

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Negative Results

  • The Single-Prolonged Stress Model Fails to Produce Behavioral or Corticosterone Alterations in Rats
  • Partial Deletion of Cxcl12 from Hippocampal Cajal–Retzius Cells Does Not Disrupt Dentate Gyrus Development or Neurobehaviors
  • Expression of HDAC3-Y298H Point Mutant in Medial Habenula Cholinergic Neurons Has No Effect on Cocaine-Induced Behaviors
Show more Research Article: Negative Results

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.