Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Variations in Clustering of Multielectrode Local Field Potentials in the Motor Cortex of Macaque Monkeys during a Reach-and-Grasp Task

Florian Chambellant, Ali Falaki, Ian Moreau-Debord, Robert French, Eleonore Serrano, Stephan Quessy, Numa Dancause and Elizabeth Thomas
eNeuro 17 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0047-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0047-24.2024
Florian Chambellant
1Unité INSERM 1093, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon Cedex 21078, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ali Falaki
2Département de neurosciences, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian Moreau-Debord
2Département de neurosciences, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert French
3LEAD - CNRS UMR 5022, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon 21000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eleonore Serrano
2Département de neurosciences, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eleonore Serrano
Stephan Quessy
2Département de neurosciences, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Numa Dancause
2Département de neurosciences, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Thomas
1Unité INSERM 1093, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon Cedex 21078, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    a, Experimental apparatus (adapted from Moreau-Debord et al., 2021). b, Trial segmentation and events. More details on the manner in which each epoch was defined can be found in the Materials and Methods, Behavioral task.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Examples of spectrograms of the LFP activity, during different sessions, aligned at Pellet drop (Time = 0; Pellet drop served as the GO cue) averaged across all trials and electrodes for the indicated movement type (ipsilateral or contralateral) and brain area of the session.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Illustration of hierarchical clustering technique. a, LFP spectral power at 2.5 Hz (scale on the right) for all the electrodes from a single trial of Monkey M. Each horizontal line corresponds to the LFP spectral power of one recorded electrode for the entire trial. The trial epochs are indicated by vertical black lines. b, Dendrogram obtained by using hierarchical clustering on the data of a. The dashed black vertical line indicates a distance of 150 (a.u.). This line was used as the point at which cluster numbers were counted. c, Data of spectrogram in a reorganized to follow the dendrogram presented in b. The clustering algorithms was applied to the entire trial and led to the clustering of information from electrodes with correlated spectral power.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    a, b, Heatmap of the average absolute pairwise correlation of LFP spectral power between electrodes at different frequencies during each phase of the movement for one trial of Monkeys S and M. c, Average absolute pairwise correlation of spectral power for the delta band for all the trials in one session for Monkey S under different trial conditions. Error bars indicate the variance between trials. d, Average of the absolute pairwise correlation in the delta band for all trials and sessions performed by the two monkeys (two sessions per monkey). Note that this included different pointing conditions. Error bars indicate the variance between trials.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Clustering of the activity in delta band recorded from all the electrodes during one trial of Monkey M. As in Figure 3, each line shows activity recorded from one electrode during the trial. The area of origin of the electrode is color coded by the column on the left of each graph (color legend on the left). It is to be noted that clusters are not restricted to a particular area of the motor cortex and contain LFPs from different regions. The black lines indicate the timing of the task epochs. a, b, are from two different sessions of Monkey M.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Average normalized cluster number in the delta band as a function of task epochs. Clusters were found using correlations. a, b, For all the trials of the same task conditions for Monkey M. There are trials from two sessions presented. c, d, For all the trials of the same task conditions for Monkey S (over two sessions). e, For all the trials of both sessions of both monkeys. In this case, the average normalized cluster number for each task epoch is the average of the values from the five subperiods. Error bars indicate the variance.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    a, Smoothed trajectory of continuous estimated cluster number for one trial of a session of Monkey S. The black arrow indicates the global minimum between Pellet drop and Start of grasp. From all recorded trials, a total of eight trials (2.11%) did not show a minimum before Start of grasp. b, Distribution of the number of trials, with time occurrence of the global minimum as a function of time delay from the Start of grasp. All delays are aligned to the Start of grasp as t = 0. Negative values would indicate that the normalized cluster number reached a minimum before the Start of grasp.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Summary of the different sessions analyzed in the study

    SessionNumber of trial conditionsNumber of electrodes
    Left hand horizontal graspLeft hand vertical graspRight hand horizontal graspRight hand vertical graspM1lPMdrPMdlPMvrPMv
    M1426232223188429--
    M1723252322-61414628
    S19252425202421222973
    S26252425255824-7654
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Student's t test comparison of correlations between a fixed number of right arm vertical grasp trials and a varying number of right arm horizontal grasps

    Trial numbersp value
    Right arm vertical graspRight arm horizontal grasp
    20200.60
    20210.60
    20220.50
    20230.56
    20240.52
    20250.51
    • The comparisons showed that the differences in trial numbers did not lead to significant differences in correlation.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (9)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 9
September 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations in Clustering of Multielectrode Local Field Potentials in the Motor Cortex of Macaque Monkeys during a Reach-and-Grasp Task
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Variations in Clustering of Multielectrode Local Field Potentials in the Motor Cortex of Macaque Monkeys during a Reach-and-Grasp Task
Florian Chambellant, Ali Falaki, Ian Moreau-Debord, Robert French, Eleonore Serrano, Stephan Quessy, Numa Dancause, Elizabeth Thomas
eNeuro 17 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0047-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0047-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Variations in Clustering of Multielectrode Local Field Potentials in the Motor Cortex of Macaque Monkeys during a Reach-and-Grasp Task
Florian Chambellant, Ali Falaki, Ian Moreau-Debord, Robert French, Eleonore Serrano, Stephan Quessy, Numa Dancause, Elizabeth Thomas
eNeuro 17 September 2024, 11 (9) ENEURO.0047-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0047-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • local field potentials
  • motor control
  • motor cortex
  • reach-and-grasp

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Odor Experience Stabilizes Glomerular Output Representations in Two Mouse Models of Autism
  • Neural Response Attenuates with Decreasing Inter-Onset Intervals Between Sounds in a Natural Soundscape
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.