Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

RNA Sequencing Demonstrates Ex Vivo Neocortical Transcriptomic Changes Induced by Epileptiform Activity in Male and Female Mice

Alec J. Vaughan, Laura J. McMeekin, Kutter Hine, Isaac W. Stubbs, Neela K. Codadu, Simon Cockell, Jonathon T. Hill, Rita Cowell, Andrew J. Trevelyan and R. Ryley Parrish
eNeuro 25 April 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0520-23.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0520-23.2024
Alec J. Vaughan
1Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura J. McMeekin
2Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laura J. McMeekin
Kutter Hine
1Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isaac W. Stubbs
1Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Neela K. Codadu
3Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Neela K. Codadu
Simon Cockell
4School of Biomedical, Nutritional and Sports Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathon T. Hill
1Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rita Cowell
2Department of Neurology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew J. Trevelyan
3Newcastle University Biosciences Institute, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Andrew J. Trevelyan
R. Ryley Parrish
1Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Ryley Parrish
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Seizures are generally associated with epilepsy but may also be a symptom of many other neurological conditions. A hallmark of a seizure is the intensity of the local neuronal activation, which can drive large-scale gene transcription changes. Such changes in the transcriptional profile likely alter neuronal function, thereby contributing to the pathological process. Therefore, there is a strong clinical imperative to characterize how gene expression is changed by seizure activity. To this end, we developed a simplified ex vivo technique for studying seizure-induced transcriptional changes. We compared the RNA sequencing profile in mouse neocortical tissue with up to 3 h of epileptiform activity induced by 4-aminopyridine (4AP) relative to control brain slices not exposed to the drug. We identified over 100 genes with significantly altered expression after 4AP treatment, including multiple genes involved in MAPK, TNF, and neuroinflammatory signaling pathways, all of which have been linked to epilepsy previously. Notably, the patterns in male and female brain slices were almost identical. Various immediate early genes were among those showing the largest upregulation. The set of down-regulated genes included ones that might be expected either to increase or to decrease neuronal excitability. In summary, we found the seizure-induced transcriptional profile complex, but the changes aligned well with an analysis of published epilepsy-associated genes. We discuss how simple models may provide new angles for investigating seizure-induced transcriptional changes.

  • epilepsy
  • gene expression
  • seizure
  • sex differences

Significance Statement

It is well-established that strong neuronal activation results in large-scale transcriptomic changes. Understanding this process is of particular importance in epilepsy, which is characterized by paroxysmal pathological discharges. However, the complexity of in vivo activity patterns present many difficulties in interpreting the transcriptional changes. In contrast, ex vivo seizure models provide better experimental control and quantification of activity patterns with lower welfare impact. Importantly, we now show that these models also replicate the transcriptional patterns previously reported in chronic human and animal epilepsy, thus validating their use in these kinds of studies.

Introduction

It has long been established that neuronal activity has a powerful influence on gene expression (Sheng et al., 1993; Lee and Fields, 2021). In turn, altered gene expression in neurons leads to changes in neuronal function, constituting an essential form of feedback control within the brain, albeit mediated on time-scale orders of magnitude slower than synaptic interactions. These slow transcriptional feedback mechanisms are, however, likely to play an important role in epileptic pathophysiology, given that seizures represent the most intense form of neuronal activation. It is crucial, therefore, to characterize precisely how acute seizure activity alters the transcriptomic landscape (Morgan et al., 1987). Gene expression changes that reduce neuronal network excitability can be characterized as negative feedback mechanisms, serving a protective, homeostatic function. In contrast, changes that increase neuronal excitability, depending on where in the network they occur, can act as positive feedback mechanisms, leading to an escalation of the pathophysiology. Both sets of changes, however, are likely to alter the interictal functionality of the network and thus contribute to comorbidity in epilepsy, including its effects on memory, attention, and general mental health. Of course, seizures will impact the neuronal network and other critical cell types, such as glial cells. Mutations in the astrocyte population can account for increased seizure susceptibility (Djukic et al., 2007; Ohno, 2018). In addition, oligodendrocytes undergo increased myelination during seizure activity (Knowles et al., 2022b), representing another glial cell class that likely impacts ictogenesis. Microglia cells represent another important cell class implicated in epilepsy that undergo significant changes during strong cellular activation (Vezzani et al., 1999; Kinoshita and Koyama, 2021). In short, a strong imperative remains to understand seizure-induced transcriptional changes in neuronal and non-neuronal cells within the brain and to develop robust methodologies for studying these.

To address this shortfall in our understanding, many groups have undertaken genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptome studies to explore causal links that lead to epilepsy and also explore possible protective changes (Hunsberger et al., 2005; Ryley Parrish et al., 2013; Hansen et al., 2014; Pitkanen et al., 2015; T. Chen et al., 2017). These large-scale transcriptomic data may further provide indications for novel therapeutic targets or extend our understanding of the basic pathophysiology of seizures by identifying “molecular hubs” (Gorter et al., 2006; Dixit et al., 2016; Dong et al., 2020; Kane et al., 2022). Despite this breadth of research, we still have a limited handle on many of the causal effects of brain injury, genetic alterations, status epilepticus, or other recognized triggers for epileptogenesis (Pitkanen et al., 2015).

Many groups have demonstrated large-scale transcriptomic changes during seizure activity (Okamoto et al., 2010; Hawkins and Kearney, 2012; Dixit et al., 2016; Guelfi et al., 2019; O'Leary et al., 2020; Li et al., 2022), indicating what might be termed the “molecular hallmark” of epileptiform activity. These studies have mainly been conducted using in vivo animal models or postmortem human brain tissue, primarily from hippocampal or whole-brain tissue sections (Jamali et al., 2006; Pitkanen et al., 2015; L. Zhang et al., 2018; Conte et al., 2020). While these approaches are valuable options for observing transcriptomic changes in response to seizures, there are significant costs to these methods. For instance, the postmortem studies are potentially confounded by gene transcription changes during the terminal phase of life and may lack relevance for epileptogenesis in early-onset (development) epilepsy. The in vivo models, on the other hand, can mitigate this cost by using multiple epilepsy-induced animals, but these models often involve significant animal welfare impact, and the experimental control for such studies can be difficult.

To address both these shortfalls, we developed an ex vivo technique to probe for transcriptional changes in mouse neocortical tissue, comparing brain slices with pharmacologically induced seizures to control slices from the same brain which that were not exposed to the ictogenic treatment. We identified over 100 genes showing marked seizure-induced changes from the control levels and analyzed these using Gene ontology (GO), KEGG pathway enrichment, and Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway analyses. We found no sex differences, but the set of genes whose expression patterns changed showed an overrepresentation of several seizure-associated pathways, including MAPK, TNF, and neuroinflammatory signaling. These results prompted us to examine possible disease associations with our gene expression changes, and using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), we found that the predicted disease of our differential expression (DE) was indeed epilepsy, consistent with the experimental model.

Our results suggest that our ex vivo brain slices replicated the large-scale transcriptional changes observed following epileptiform activity in vivo while offering levels of accessibility for recording and experimental control not usually possible in vivo and certainly not in clinical tissue. This provides a highly refined approach to studying epileptic pathology, yielding multiple experimental replicates within biological individuals, while minimizing welfare issues and harm to the animals involved.

Materials and Methods

Availability of data

The code/software described in the paper is freely available online at https://rb.gy/spf86r. The code is available as Extended Data. The code was run on a MacBook Air (Retina, 13-inch, 2019) using the macOS 12.7.1 operating system. The RNA sequencing datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available on the NCBI SRA website under the token PRJNA1032094.

Ethical approval

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the UK Home Office and Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and approved by the Newcastle University Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body (AWERB # 545).

Slice preparation

Male and female C57BL/6 mice (Jackson Laboratory stock number 000664; age ∼12 weeks) were used in this study. Mice were housed in individually ventilated cages in a 12 h light/dark regime. Animals received food and water ad libitum. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation and brains removed and stored in cold cutting solution as follows (in mM): 3 MgCl2; 126 NaCl; 26 NaHCO3; 3.5 KCl; 1.26 NaH2PO4; 10 glucose. For local field potential (LFP) recordings, 450 µm horizontal sections were made containing the neocortex, entorhinal cortex, and the hippocampus using a Leica VT1000 Vibratome. Slices were then transferred to an interface holding chamber and incubated for 1–2 h at room temperature in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) containing the following (in mM): 2 CaCl2; 1 MgCl2; 126 NaCl; 26 NaHCO3; 3.5 KCl; 1.26 NaH2PO4; 10 glucose.

Extracellular field recordings were performed using interface recording chambers. Slices were placed in the recording chamber perfused with modified aCSF to induce epileptiform activity [100 µM 4-aminopyrimidine (4AP); Librizzi et al., 2017]. Recordings were obtained using normal aCSF-filled 1–3 MΩ borosilicate glass microelectrodes (GC120TF-10; Harvard Apparatus) placed in deep layers of the temporal association area. Experiments were performed at 33–36°C. The solutions were perfused at the rate of 3.5 ml/min. Waveform signals were acquired using BMA-931 biopotential amplifier (Dataq Instruments), Micro 1401-3 ADC board (Cambridge Electronic Design), and Spike2 software (v7.10, Cambridge Electronic Design). Signals were sampled at 10 kHz, amplified (gain, 500), and bandpass filtered (1–3,000 Hz). The CED4001-16 Mains Pulser (Cambridge Electronic Design) was connected to the events input of CED micro 1401-3 ADC board and used to remove 50 Hz hum offline. Seizure-like events (SLEs) were visually identified with their start time as the time of occurrence of high-frequency rhythmic bursts (tonic phase) associated with high-frequency signals, and the events were considered to end when the interval between two after-discharges (clonic phase) was ≥2 s.

Tissue collection and RNA extraction

After 3 h of recordings, the neocortex (containing the auditory and somatosensory cortex) was subdissected away from the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus and then flash frozen with dry ice and stored at −80°C. For the RNA extraction, tissue was homogenized in TRIzol using an Omni bead ruptor homogenizer (Omni International), and RNA was isolated using the TRIzol/chloroform–isopropanol method following the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen) for collection of total RNA. RNA concentration and purity were determined using a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop One (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Fourteen total samples were collected, eight of which were exposed to 4AP and six controls that were treated identically except without 4AP treatment. Of the 4AP-treated slices, five were from male and three were from female mice. Likewise, six total slices from male and female brains were sequenced from the aCSF control group.

RNA sequencing and DE analysis

Both the library prep and the sequencing were conducted by the Genomics Core Facility at Newcastle University on a Illumina NextSeq 500 (Illumina). Library prep was performed using the SmartSeq and Nextera XT kits. The sequencing was across two NextSeq 500 High-Output (150 cycle flow cells) producing 2 × 75 bp reads. All parts of the RNA sequencing analysis pipeline were conducted in R and can be found in their entirety in the .html file Extended Data Figure 1. Each of the samples were designated with their treatment followed by an assigned number and their sex (e.g., ACSF-5F) for the analysis. After sequencing, quality control was assessed using FastQC (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). The sequencing reads were aligned using the Rsubread package (Liao et al., 2019) to the GRCm39 assembly of the mouse genome accessed through the Ensembl genome annotation platform. A count matrix was created from this alignment, which was used to conduct the DE analysis through the DESeq2 package (Love et al., 2014). Data were analyzed using a factorial design with the factors 4AP treatment, sex, and a sex:treatment interacting factor to determine the cause of particular gene expression changes. Genes with a calculated adjusted p value of <0.05 and absolute log2 Fold Change (FC) values >0.585 (a 50% change in expression) were considered significant. Once our analysis of sex-specific differences in response to treatment revealed no significant DE genes, we focused on the impact of the 4AP treatment on DE. Hierarchical clustering was performed for a comparison of the top 30 upregulated and 10 downregulated genes based on log2FC and adjusted p value. The respective count values from the DE analysis were converted into z-scores and clustered and converted into a heatmap using the ComplexHeatmap package (Gu et al., 2016).

Extended Data 1

File containing the code used to run the analysis. Download Extended Data 1, ZIP file.

GO and other functional enrichment analyses

To further characterize the associations between the 4AP treatment DE genes, functional analysis was performed on the list of 110 DE genes, referred to hereafter as the gene set. Enrichment of Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Processes (BP) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses was assessed using the clusterProfiler package (Yu et al., 2012). For the GO:BP analysis, the simplify function was used to filter redundant parent–child associations into singular, informative BP terms. Full GO results can be found in Extended Data Figure 4-1. The meshes package was used to access MeSH Disease annotations for the gene list to investigate the diseases that our gene set was associated with (Yu, 2018). Twenty-four brain-related diseases and disorders were selected to highlight, and the full list of 247 enriched disease categories, along with the full GO:BP and KEGG results, can be found in Extended Data Figure 4-1. Unless otherwise specified, all plots are of the top enriched categories (adjusted p values <0.05) and were plotted using the enrichplot package (Yu et al., 2012). To analyze transcription factor binding sites, we used the Homer software package to do an overrepresentation analysis for our gene list, and both de novo and known motifs were selected (Heinz et al., 2010). The function was set to search 1,000 bp upstream and 100 bp downstream of the transcription start of the specific gene. For a background dataset, we selected the whole genome to enable statistical analysis.

IPA analysis

Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway analysis was carried out on our DE gene set using the log2FC and adjusted p value for each gene (Kramer et al., 2014). All DE genes mapped to the knowledge base and the z-score setting was used to quantify specific pathway activation status. Canonical pathway analysis was examined and extracted to identify pathways that were predicted by the algorithm to be activated or inhibited, the full list of which can be found in Extended Data Figure 5-1. Pathways with greater than log B-H adjusted p values of 1.3 were considered significant. Likewise, IPA Diseases and Function analysis was used to predict disease states based on our DE genes. B-H adjusted p values were used to test for significance.

Statistics

Electrophysiology data were analyzed offline using Matlab R2018b (MathWorks). Statistical tests shown in Figure 1 were analyzed using a Student's t tests. R was used for the analysis of all the RNA sequencing data as described above.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Induced seizure-like activity is similar from slices made from male and female mice. A, Example of a typical neocortical deep-layer LFP recording. B, Example LFP trace from a slice made from a male mouse and exposed to 4AP. C, Equivalent recording from a female mouse. D, There is no difference in the time to the first SLE between slices made from male and female mice (unpaired t test; p = 0.24). E, There is no difference in the number of SLE between slices made from male and female mice (unpaired t test; p = 0.72). F, There is no difference in the time to late recurrent discharges between male and female mice (unpaired t test; p = 0.68).

Results

Ex vivo epileptiform activity evolves in a similar pattern in both males and females

We sought to determine the utility of ex vivo seizure models for studying seizure-induced transcriptomic changes. Brain slices were prepared from male and female mice and bathed in 100 µM 4AP while recording the evolving epileptiform activity patterns (Fig. 1A). 4-AP induced a characteristic build-up of seizure-like activity over time, starting with early interictal-like discharges, followed by intermittent SLEs, and culminating in late recurrent discharges (Codadu et al., 2019a). This final stage appears to represent a steady state of hyperexcitability and has been suggested to be equivalent to in vivo status epilepticus (Fig. 1B,C; C. L. Zhang et al., 1995; Dreier et al., 1998).

Ex vivo epileptiform activity shows minimal gene expression differences between the sexes

We found no difference in the evolving pattern of epileptiform activity between male and female mice (Fig. 1D–F), suggesting that naive susceptibility to pharmacologically induced seizure activity is similar between the sexes. We then examined whether the equivalent epileptiform activity induced distinct transcriptomic expression patterns between sexes. To address this, we conducted RNA sequencing on 14 different brain slices: 8 treated with 4AP (5 male and 3 female), all of which developed intense epileptiform discharges, and 6 control slices (3 male and 3 female), where no drug was added, and which did not display any pathological discharges. The duration of the treatment was 3 h. After this period, the RNA was isolated from the tissue. Illumina sequencing was performed on these samples, and the reads were aligned to the mouse genome for subsequent analysis of DE using the DESeq2 package.

To determine the specific factors contributing to the gene expression changes, namely, sex, seizure induction, or their combination, we employed the design feature of DESeq2 to account for these variables by segmenting the variance in the samples. Initially, we examined any sex-specific gene expression changes associated with epileptiform activity. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that both male and female samples exhibited the greatest variance between slices with induced seizure-like activity versus control samples, rather than being influenced by sex alone (Fig. 2A). Consistent with this result, only 15 genes exhibited DE based on sex of the sample, with the most significant difference between the sexes being found in genes on the X or Y chromosomes (Fig. 2B, Table 1). Further analysis of the combinatorial DE between the responses of each sex to seizures revealed no significant gene changes (Fig. 2C). Consequently, we concluded that induced seizure-like activity elicits minimal differences between male and female mice when utilizing an ex vivo preparation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

RNA-seq of male and female slices show no differences between sex in gene expression in response to epileptiform activity. A, PCA plot of the RNA-seq gene expression data from each of the 14 samples separated by sex as shown by the female samples in orange and the males in blue. B, Volcano plot showing DE of genes between male and female samples controlling for treatment condition. Upregulated genes are higher expressed in the male slices, and downregulated genes are present more in the female slices. C, Volcano plot of genes in response to the combination of the sex of the sample and the seizure treatment. Genes are plotted with their log2FC against the −log10(padj). The red horizontal line is at 13 which denotes a FDR = 0.05 and the blue vertical lines are at −0.58 and 0.58 showing the log2FC cutoffs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

List of differential expressed genes based on sex

DE analysis of ex vivo epileptiform activity reveals significant gene expression changes

After finding no significant DE genes in our sex-specific analysis, we evaluated differences between the experimental groups, using both PCA and hierarchical clustering (Fig. 3A,B). The volcano plot in Figure 3C visually represents the DE genes, showing upregulation of 82 genes and downregulation of 28 genes in response to seizure induction (refer to Extended Data Fig. 3-1 for the full list). As expected, upon initial analysis of the DE genes, we observed that several of the most highly upregulated transcripts were immediate early genes, including c-Fos, early growth response protein 4 (Egr4), activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein (Arc), ADP-ribosylation factor-like protein 4D (Arl4d), and neuronal PAS domain protein 4 (Npas4). Notably, Npas4 has also been described as a transcription factor with a potential antiseizure role (D. Wang et al., 2014). Among the downregulated genes, we found examples that might be predicted to either decrease neuronal excitability (e.g., the calcium voltage channel Cav3.2, Cacna1h; log2FC of −0.70) or increase it (e.g., Adora2a, which codes for the adenosine A2A receptor; log2FC of −2.61).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

DE analysis of ex vivo slices shows large-scale gene expression changes in response to 4AP treatment. A, PCA plot of the samples as in Figure 2A, separated by aCSF and 4AP treatment shown in orange and blue respectively. B, Volcano plot as in Figure 2B of the DE genes after seizure induction. C, Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of the top 30 upregulated and 10 downregulated genes for each of the samples shown in a column. A gradient from red to blue represents the expression of the gene in each sample, the red box denotes a higher expression, and a blue box denotes lower expression. The columns show the log2FC value and average expression values for the specific genes. See Extended Data Figure 3-1 for more details.

Extended Data 3-1

Comprehensive list of DE genes. Download Extended Data 3-1, XLS file.

In order to explore these gene expression changes more deeply, we used the Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG pathway resources (Ashburner et al., 2000; Kanehisa and Goto, 2000; Gene Ontology Consortium et al., 2023). GO:Biological Process analysis revealed a significant enrichment of over 300 categories (refer to Extended Data Fig. 4-1 for the full list). To address redundancy resulting from hierarchical ontology parent–child relationships, we utilized the clusterProfiler package to streamline the GO results, resulting in 159 simplified categories. Figure 4A presents a selection of 20 enriched categories, illustrating various cellular responses to seizure activity. Among the enriched categories, several signaling pathways stood out, including the p38 MAPK, ERK 1/2 cascade, response to TGFB signaling, neurotropin signaling, calcium ion response, and response to peptide hormone pathways. While the involvement of the MAPK pathway and calcium ion response in epileptogenesis have long been recognized, the roles of these other pathways in relation to seizure disorders are not yet fully established (Steinlein, 2014; Gautam et al., 2021). Notably, several categories related to neuron death, apoptosis, and transcription activation in response to stress were also enriched, which may be attributed to the extensive brain damage caused by seizure activity. We found several intriguing pathways, including those involving the positive regulation of miRNAs, catecholamine secretion, and categories associated with vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, as well as learning and memory. Additionally, when we performed KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, we observed overlaps within the enriched pathways identified through GO analysis, particularly in the MAPK signaling pathway, TNF signaling pathway, and apoptosis (Fig. 4B). These findings provide valuable insights into the complex molecular processes underlying seizure-induced changes.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Gene ontology and pathway analysis reveal complex molecular regulatory networks post epileptiform activity. A, Bar plot of 20 significantly enriched GO:Biological Process categories, bar color shows the relative significance based on the adjusted p value, and the length of the bar shows the number of upregulated genes enriched in the respective categories. B, KEGG pathway enrichment analysis was performed on the gene set. Bar plot is arranged as in Figure 4A and includes the nine pathways that were significantly enriched. C, Homer motif software results from enrichment analysis of the DE genes, motifs were either created de novo or were from the known database. p values were calculated against the full list of background genes in the software and % of genes with a respective transcription factor motif are shown. See Extended Data Figure 4-1 for more details.

Extended Data 4-1

Comprehensive list containing GO:BP results and KEGG analysis. Download Extended Data 4-1, XLS file.

In light of the broad activity observed across various signaling pathways, we aimed to identify critical transcription factors responsible for the observed gene expression changes. To accomplish this, we analyzed our DE genes for enrichment of specific transcription factor binding motifs using the HOMER software. Of particular interest was the cAMP-response element binding protein (Creb), known to be activated by phosphorylation downstream of the MAPK and PKA pathways, as well as the crucial role of Creb-mediated transcriptional regulation in response to epileptogenesis (G. Wang et al., 2020; Mertz et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2022). Further analysis using HOMER showed a Creb motif upstream of 29% of the genes (Fig. 4C), indicative of the involvement of Creb in mediating a large proportion of our observed gene expression changes. Additionally, we identified highly enriched motifs for Srf, Atf2, and Npas4, which were upstream of over 15% of the DE genes. These transcription factors play significant roles in cellular stress response, and many have been implicated in mediating gene expression changes following seizures (Mielke et al., 1999; Losing et al., 2017; Shan et al., 2018). By identifying these enriched transcription factor binding motifs, we provide insights into the potential regulatory mechanisms driving the observed gene expression patterns. Further investigation into the specific interactions between these transcription factors and their target genes could shed light on the molecular processes underlying the cellular response to epileptiform activity.

To deepen our understanding of the specific cellular pathway responses to our observed gene expression changes, we leveraged Qiagen IPA analysis, which provides a machine learning algorithm and gene annotations to identify pathway enrichment and to predict pathway activation state (Kramer et al., 2014). Our results, shown in Figure 5, illustrate the complex signaling environment triggered by epileptiform activity. Several of the seizure-induced upregulated pathways that we identified are related to inflammatory and immune signaling (see Extended Data Fig. 5-1 for a comprehensive list), including IL-8 cytokine signaling, Hmgb1 production, neuroinflammation, and Cxcr4 signaling. Cxcr4, the receptor for the Cxcl12 ligand, has been implicated in neuroinflammation and has an emerging role in the induction of pro-seizure activity (Zhou et al., 2017). Furthermore, our GO and KEGG analysis also showed an enrichment for the production of IL-1β and IL-17 signaling, providing increased evidence of the importance of immune signaling after seizure activity (Dong et al., 2020; Wolinski et al., 2022). IPA predicted a downregulation of cAMP signaling, which would lead to a decrease in MAPK and PKA pathways (Bozzi et al., 2011). Upon further investigation, we observed an upregulation of several phosphatases involved in dampening MAPK signaling (Dusp1/4/5/6/14), many of which have been implicated in seizure responses (An et al., 2021). This might be considered to be a compensatory mechanism opposing the dramatic activation of these signaling pathways following seizure induction and could be potential therapeutic targets (Kirchner et al., 2020).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

IPA predicts the activation of inflammatory regulatory networks and inhibition of cAMP signaling in response to epileptiform activity. Plot shows IPA canonical pathway prediction status based on the DE genes. Respective pathways are shown with the length of the bar representing the −log of the B-H adjusted p value for multiple testing. The bar color represents the z-score value activation (orange) or inhibition (blue) predicted state of the pathway. See Extended Data Figure 5-1 for more details.

Extended Data 5-1

Comprehensive list of canonical pathways predicted to be activated or inhibited. Download Extended Data 5-1, XLS file.

Ingenuity pathway analysis predicted epilepsy as the causal disease

We next sought to determine whether the transcriptional changes following acute induction of seizure-like activity ex vivo could recapitulate gene expression changes established in previously published epilepsy models. To examine this, we utilized MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) analysis of disease-associated genes in published articles on PubMed (http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). This analysis links terms, such as a particular gene, to specified categories, such as neurological conditions (Yu, 2018). Using MeSH, we performed an enrichment analysis comparing our DE gene set with disease terms. We identified 247 diseases that could potentially be associated with the observed gene expression changes, many of which were neurological disorders and brain injuries (Fig. 6A, complete list available in Extended Data Fig. 6-1). We found statistically significant enrichment for status epilepticus, absence epilepsy, and tonic–clonic epilepsy-related genes. Additionally, we observed categories related to substance addiction (e.g., cocaine-related disorders, morphine dependence), brain development disorders, and brain injuries.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Disease Enrichment and IPA analysis of upregulated genes show significant links to epilepsy and other brain injuries. A, Enrichment analysis of MeSH disease annotations from the upregulated gene set. A total of 247 disease terms were enriched and the bar plot is a selection of 20 enriched neuro-related diseases. Bar plot is as Figure 4. B, Venn diagram of the overlap of the significantly DE genes from the CGS (Soon et al., 2023) and our ex vivo gene set. C, GO:BP analysis was performed as described in Figure 4A on our ex vivo gene set, the comparison gene set, and the 41 genes that overlapped as shown in B. The categories that were significantly enriched (adj. p value ≤0.05) were compared and plotted. D, IPA analysis of gene set reveals epilepsy as the top disease state predicted from the DE genes with a p value of 1 × 10−28. Image shows the specific DE genes associated with epilepsy in the IPA knowledge base that were enriched in the IPA disease state analysis. Length of the bar represents the log2FC values for each gene. See Extended Data Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3 for more details.

Extended Data 6-1

Comprehensive list of diseases potentially associated with observed gene expression data. Download Extended Data 6-1, XLS file.

Extended Data 6-2

Comprehensive list of the Complete Gene Set from Soon et al. (2023) and list of overlapped genes. Download Extended Data 6-2, XLS file.

Extended Data 6-3

GO:BP analysis on the overlapping gene list, the comparison gene set, and our gene set. Download Extended Data 6-3, XLS file.

To further validate our ex vivo dataset, we searched the literature for other studies reporting RNA sequencing datasets from the acute stage of epileptogenesis. We focused on datasets that were comparable to our experimental design and technical approach to sequencing. We identified a study that investigated the transcriptomics of the early stage of seizure response using a pilocarpine-induced mouse model for 2 h before tissue isolation (Soon et al., 2023). While the Soon et al. (2023) study was narrowed to sequencing RNA from the nuclei of excitatory neurons from whole forebrain tissue samples, it represents an in vivo approach with a similar timeline following seizure induction as our dataset. The summarized results table from their DE analysis was obtained and we identified 480 differentially expressed genes (221 upregulated, 259 downregulated). This gene set, hereafter referred to as comparison gene set (CGS), can be found in Extended Data Figure 6-2. We found 41 genes that were codifferentially expressed in both our experiment and the Soon et al. (2023) study (Fig. 6B, complete gene list available in Extended Data Fig. 6-2).

To elucidate whether these overlapping genes are responsible for driving the signaling response postseizure induction or were simply experimental artifacts, we ran GO:BP analysis on both the overlapping gene list and the CGS and, along with our existing analysis of our gene set, we identified the shared statistically significant categories between these groups (full results can be found in Extended Data Fig. 6-3). Our results show that 62 categories were enriched in each of the analyses (Fig. 6C), suggesting that the 41 shared genes might recapitulate the functional output of seizure response and give further evidence to support our ex vivo results.

Given the technical differences between our experimental design and the Soon et al. (2023) study, we also ran ingenuity pathway analysis to determine the disease most likely responsible for our observed gene expression changes for further validation of our ex vivo approach. Epilepsy was the top disease state predicted based on the behavior of the 30 DE genes shown in Figure 6D. Our results across all three methods consistently suggest that our ex vivo approach can replicate the gene expression phenotype of seizure activity.

Discussion

Ex vivo studies of large network activity patterns are sometimes disregarded because they are considered unrepresentative of the in vivo condition. Yet such simplified models offer many experimental advantages, and so it is helpful to examine how they might be used to tease apart the nature of especially complex neurological phenomena such as epileptic pathophysiology. Here, we performed transcriptomic analyses of brain slices that have experienced periods of intense epileptiform activation, finding changes in many genes that have been highlighted in other studies of epilepsy, as well as predicting key upstream transcription factors and potential therapeutic targets. Our ex vivo data were further validated by finding that the most closely related disorder associated with the gene expression patterns is indeed epilepsy.

These simplified, ex vivo preparations offer various benefits. Firstly, the ease of access to the tissue allows for a far tighter correlation between the observed gene expression profiles and specific patterns of electrophysiology activity, mapped with precision using multielectrode arrays (Mahadevan et al., 2022; Thouta et al., 2022), patch-clamp recordings, or imaging (Cammarota et al., 2013; Codadu et al., 2019b; Calin et al., 2021). Experimental manipulations using pharmacology, optogenetic, chemogenetic, or electrical stimulation can be similarly ​targeted (Calin et al., 2018; Papasavvas et al., 2020; Graham et al., 2023). These approaches allow for easy manipulation of both neuronal and non-neuronal cell classes, allowing for an increased ability to “dissect” the impact of individual cell classes on observed gene expression changes. Additionally, one animal can provide many experimental replicates, reducing variability and cost of the study, while also increasing the power of the study, thereby increasing the likelihood of identifying potential therapeutic targets. Ex vivo preparations do have their limitations; our preparations were fixed just a few hours after the slices are prepared, thus providing information only on the earliest transcriptional changes. Slower processes, though, may yet be amenable to experimental study in organotypic cultures (Lillis et al., 2015). In addition, ex vivo seizure induction is typically done with solution manipulations, such as the 4AP paradigm used in this study, which raises the question of whether the transcriptional changes observed were due to the drug treatment or the induced seizure activity. While our IPA analysis confirms our transcriptional changes largely overlap with expression profiles seen with human seizures and in in vivo rodent seizure models, these concerns can be addressed by future studies validating these results with other proconvulsant solutions, such as the low 0 Mg2+ paradigm (Parrish et al., 2019). In general, our validation of the patterns of transcriptional changes in these acute preparations, in conjunction with the advantages they offer, particularly with respect to animal welfare considerations (the “3Rs,” reduction, refinement, replacement; Lidster et al., 2016), provide a strong incentive for their greater adoption in the arsenal of experimental approaches for studying epilepsy.

Our ex vivo study has focused on assessment of total RNA transcriptional changes from neocortical tissue during acute seizure activity with whole tissue homogenates. We primarily focused on the neocortex due to the robustness of the presentation of tonic–clonic-like seizures that evolve into status epileptics-like discharges from these tissue preparations (Fig. 1). Other brain regions such as the hippocampus typically do not present tonic–clonic-like seizures from ex vivo preparations and instead display transient epileptiform discharges or do not have significant epileptiform activity until hours into the proconvulsant media (Codadu et al., 2019b). Future work could compare these two brain regions with the caveat that the epileptiform discharges develop with a different time scale and differ also with respect to the signature patterns of electrophysiological discharges. While our study focused on total RNA transcriptional changes, one could also use other techniques such as a ribosomal tag to “pull down” the mRNA that is primed for transcription and can allow for details of cell-type specific mRNA expression (Sanz et al., 2019). This would be a noteworthy follow-up experiment, where one can address transcriptional changes from mRNA being transcribed between different neuronal subtypes, glial cell types, and microglia. Indeed, our proof-of-principle study shapes the groundwork for future studies.

Notably, we found that slices from male and female mice show similar evolution of seizure-like activity following application of the convulsant drug 4AP, as well as similar patterns of seizure-induced gene expression changes. The absence of obvious sex differences in acutely induced seizure-like activity thus appears to be subtly different from the situation in chronic epilepsy. For instance, seizure severity has previously been reported to be higher in male than in female rats following pilocarpine administration (Matovu and Cavalheiro, 2022). In clinical medicine, men also show higher epilepsy prevalence while also having more severe seizures (Christensen et al., 2007; McHugh and Delanty, 2008; Christian et al., 2020), although a factor here may be that men are more likely to sustain head injuries. Notably, sex differences were found in a study of the gene expression profiles of blood samples from epilepsy patients from wide demographic range and multiple seizure types with epilepsy (Zhu et al., 2021). Further work will be required to ascertain whether gender differences are restricted to specific types of epilepsy or experimental models or are specific to the tissue sampled (blood vs the cortical tissue itself).

Since our own data found no difference between sexes, we pooled the male and female datasets for subsequent analyses to increase their statistical power, finding 82 genes that were upregulated and 28 downregulated, by the prior seizure-like activity. Many of these were immediate early genes, with the upregulation of Npas4 being particularly interesting given its suggested antiseizure role (D. Wang et al., 2014). Similarly, one may impute homeostatic, antiepileptic, negative feedback mechanisms (D. Wang et al., 2014; Y. Chen et al., 2014; Cain et al., 2018; Trevelyan et al., 2023) from the known function of certain genes (e.g., upregulation of Npas4 or downregulation of Cacna1h). In contrast, other transcriptional changes we observed appear to enact positive feedback by promoting more seizure activity, such as the downregulation of Adora2a. Adenosine acts as an endogenous anticonvulsive, and the A2A receptor is one of its primary targets (Baltos et al., 2023). These results may be reconciled by the observation that long-term activation of the A2A receptor has been demonstrated to result in internalization (Palmer et al., 1994; Sheth et al., 2014), in which case downregulation of Adora2a may also be antiepileptic by the same mechanism.

We also examined gene changes within the context of their involvement in various signaling and cellular pathways. Notable among these were changes in transcription factors and genes involving the MAPK pathway, neurotrophins, and calcium ion response. Previous work also implicated the MAPK pathway as a potential disease-modifying route in epilepsy (Parrish et al., 2018), while transcription factors, such as Creb, are increasingly considered as targets for therapy in seizure disorders (Sun et al., 2022).

A major goal for the treatment of complex conditions such as epilepsy is to find how to use big transcriptional datasets for precision medicine for individual patients, but this still lies in the future (Orsini et al., 2018; Striano and Minassian, 2020; Knowles et al., 2022a). We present a case for progressing this field using simplified epilepsy models, such as those used here, paired with other new toolkits in neuroscience, such as optogenetics and chemogenetics, to advance our understanding of these conditions and create avenues for novel treatment options.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • We like to thank Rachel Queen for her early assistance with the RNA sequencing analysis. We also thank the Newcastle University sequencing core for their help with preforming the RNA sequencing. In addition, we thank Jing Wang of the UAB Neuroscience Core Center (Project number: 5P30NS047466-13).

  • This work was supported by Epilepsy Research UK and by BYU College of Life Sciences New Faculty Start-up Funds.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. An N,
    2. Bassil K,
    3. Al Jowf GI,
    4. Steinbusch HWM,
    5. Rothermel M,
    6. de Nijs L,
    7. Rutten BPF
    (2021) Dual-specificity phosphatases in mental and neurological disorders. Prog Neurobiol 198:101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101906
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Ashburner M, et al.
    (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/75556 pmid:10802651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Baltos JA,
    2. Casillas-Espinosa PM,
    3. Rollo B,
    4. Gregory KJ,
    5. White PJ,
    6. Christopoulos A,
    7. Kwan P,
    8. O'Brien TJ,
    9. May LT
    (2023) The role of the adenosine system in epilepsy and its comorbidities. Br J Pharmacol 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.16094
  4. ↵
    1. Bozzi Y,
    2. Dunleavy M,
    3. Henshall DC
    (2011) Cell signaling underlying epileptic behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 5:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2011.00045 pmid:21852968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cain SM, et al.
    (2018) Ca(V) 3.2 drives sustained burst-firing, which is critical for absence seizure propagation in reticular thalamic neurons. Epilepsia 59:778–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.14018 pmid:29468672
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Calin A,
    2. Ilie AS,
    3. Akerman CJ
    (2021) Disrupting epileptiform activity by preventing parvalbumin interneuron depolarization block. J Neurosci 41:9452–9465. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1002-20.2021 pmid:34611025
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Calin A,
    2. Stancu M,
    3. Zagrean AM,
    4. Jefferys JGR,
    5. Ilie AS,
    6. Akerman CJ
    (2018) Chemogenetic recruitment of specific Interneurons suppresses seizure activity. Front Cell Neurosci 12:293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2018.00293 pmid:30233328
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Cammarota M,
    2. Losi G,
    3. Chiavegato A,
    4. Zonta M,
    5. Carmignoto G
    (2013) Fast spiking interneuron control of seizure propagation in a cortical slice model of focal epilepsy. J Physiol 591:807–822. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2012.238154 pmid:23207591
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chen T,
    2. Giri M,
    3. Xia Z,
    4. Subedi YN,
    5. Li Y
    (2017) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of epilepsy: a review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 13:1841–1859. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S142032 pmid:28761347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Parker WD,
    3. Wang K
    (2014) The role of T-type calcium channel genes in absence seizures. Front Neurol 5:45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00045 pmid:24847307
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Christensen J,
    2. Vestergaard M,
    3. Pedersen MG,
    4. Pedersen CB,
    5. Olsen J,
    6. Sidenius P
    (2007) Incidence and prevalence of epilepsy in Denmark. Epilepsy Res 76:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2007.06.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Christian CA,
    2. Reddy DS,
    3. Maguire J,
    4. Forcelli PA
    (2020) Sex differences in the epilepsies and associated comorbidities: implications for use and development of pharmacotherapies. Pharmacol Rev 72:767–800. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.119.017392 pmid:32817274
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Codadu NK,
    2. Graham RT,
    3. Burman RJ,
    4. Jackson-Taylor RT,
    5. Raimondo JV,
    6. Trevelyan AJ,
    7. Parrish RR
    (2019a) Divergent paths to seizure-like events. Physiol Rep 7:e14226. https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14226 pmid:31587522
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Codadu NK,
    2. Parrish RR,
    3. Trevelyan AJ
    (2019b) Region-specific differences and areal interactions underlying transitions in epileptiform activity. J Physiol 597:2079–2096. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277267 pmid:30681139
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Conte G, et al.
    (2020) High concordance between hippocampal transcriptome of the mouse intra-amygdala kainic acid model and human temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 61:2795–2810. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.16714
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Dixit AB,
    2. Banerjee J,
    3. Srivastava A,
    4. Tripathi M,
    5. Sarkar C,
    6. Kakkar A,
    7. Jain M,
    8. Chandra PS
    (2016) RNA-seq analysis of hippocampal tissues reveals novel candidate genes for drug refractory epilepsy in patients with MTLE-HS. Genomics 107:178–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2016.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Djukic B,
    2. Casper KB,
    3. Philpot BD,
    4. Chin LS,
    5. McCarthy KD
    (2007) Conditional knock-out of Kir4.1 leads to glial membrane depolarization, inhibition of potassium and glutamate uptake, and enhanced short-term synaptic potentiation. J Neurosci 27:11354–11365. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0723-07.2007 pmid:17942730
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Dong X,
    2. Hao X,
    3. Xu P,
    4. Fan M,
    5. Wang X,
    6. Huang X,
    7. Jiang P,
    8. Zeng L,
    9. Xie Y
    (2020) RNA sequencing analysis of cortex and hippocampus in a kainic acid rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy to identify mechanisms and therapeutic targets related to inflammation, immunity and cognition. Int Immunopharmacol 87:106825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106825
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Dreier JP,
    2. Zhang CL,
    3. Heinemann U
    (1998) Phenytoin, phenobarbital, and midazolam fail to stop status epilepticus-like activity induced by low magnesium in rat entorhinal slices, but can prevent its development. Acta Neurol Scand 98:154–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.1998.tb07286.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Gautam V,
    2. Rawat K,
    3. Sandhu A,
    4. Kumari P,
    5. Singh N,
    6. Saha L
    (2021) An insight into crosstalk among multiple signaling pathways contributing to epileptogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol 910:174469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174469
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Gene Ontology Consortium
    2. et al.
    (2023) The gene ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics 224:iyad031. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/iyad031 pmid:36866529
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gorter JA,
    2. van Vliet EA,
    3. Aronica E,
    4. Breit T,
    5. Rauwerda H,
    6. Lopes da Silva FH,
    7. Wadman WJ
    (2006) Potential new antiepileptogenic targets indicated by microarray analysis in a rat model for temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurosci 26:11083–11110. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2766-06.2006 pmid:17065450
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Graham RT,
    2. Parrish RR,
    3. Alberio L,
    4. Johnson EL,
    5. Owens L,
    6. Trevelyan AJ
    (2023) Optogenetic stimulation reveals a latent tipping point in cortical networks during ictogenesis. Brain 146:2814–2827. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac487 pmid:36572952
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gu Z,
    2. Eils R,
    3. Schlesner M
    (2016) Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32:2847–2849. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Guelfi S, et al.
    (2019) Transcriptomic and genetic analyses reveal potential causal drivers for intractable partial epilepsy. Brain 142:1616–1630. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awz074
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Hansen KF,
    2. Sakamoto K,
    3. Pelz C,
    4. Impey S,
    5. Obrietan K
    (2014) Profiling status epilepticus-induced changes in hippocampal RNA expression using high-throughput RNA sequencing. Sci Rep 4:6930. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06930 pmid:25373493
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hawkins NA,
    2. Kearney JA
    (2012) Confirmation of an epilepsy modifier locus on mouse chromosome 11 and candidate gene analysis by RNA-Seq. Genes Brain Behav 11:452–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00790.x pmid:22471526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Heinz S,
    2. Benner C,
    3. Spann N,
    4. Bertolino E,
    5. Lin YC,
    6. Laslo P,
    7. Cheng JX,
    8. Murre C,
    9. Singh H,
    10. Glass CK
    (2010) Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell 38:576–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.05.004 pmid:20513432
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Hunsberger JG,
    2. Bennett AH,
    3. Selvanayagam E,
    4. Duman RS,
    5. Newton SS
    (2005) Gene profiling the response to kainic acid induced seizures. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 141:95–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2005.08.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Jamali S, et al.
    (2006) Large-scale expression study of human mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: evidence for dysregulation of the neurotransmission and complement systems in the entorhinal cortex. Brain 129:625–641. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kane O, et al.
    (2022) Characterization of spontaneous seizures and EEG abnormalities in a mouse model of the human A350V IQSEC2 mutation and identification of a possible target for precision medicine based therapy. Epilepsy Res 182:106907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106907
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Kanehisa M,
    2. Goto S
    (2000) KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 pmid:10592173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Kinoshita S,
    2. Koyama R
    (2021) Pro- and anti-epileptic roles of microglia. Neural Regen Res 16:1369–1371. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.300976 pmid:33318419
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kirchner A,
    2. Bagla S,
    3. Dachet F,
    4. Loeb JA
    (2020) DUSP4 appears to be a highly localized endogenous inhibitor of epileptic signaling in human neocortex. Neurobiol Dis 145:105073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105073 pmid:32890776
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Knowles JK, et al.
    (2022a) Precision medicine for genetic epilepsy on the horizon: recent advances, present challenges, and suggestions for continued progress. Epilepsia 63:2461–2475. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.17332 pmid:35716052
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Knowles JK, et al.
    (2022b) Maladaptive myelination promotes generalized epilepsy progression. Nat Neurosci 25:596–606. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-022-01052-2 pmid:35501379
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kramer A,
    2. Green J,
    3. Pollard J Jr.,
    4. Tugendreich S
    (2014) Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics 30:523–530. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703 pmid:24336805
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Lee PR,
    2. Fields RD
    (2021) Activity-dependent gene expression in neurons. Neuroscientist 27:355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858420943515 pmid:32727285
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Wang Q,
    3. Zhang DW,
    4. Wu D,
    5. Zhang SW,
    6. Wei ZR,
    7. Chen X,
    8. Li W
    (2022) Hippocampus RNA sequencing of pentylenetetrazole-kindled rats and upon treatment of novel chemical Q808. Front Pharmacol 13:820508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.820508 pmid:35345815
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Liao Y,
    2. Smyth GK,
    3. Shi W
    (2019) The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res 47:e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz114 pmid:30783653
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Librizzi L,
    2. Losi G,
    3. Marcon I,
    4. Sessolo M,
    5. Scalmani P,
    6. Carmignoto G,
    7. de Curtis M
    (2017) Interneuronal network activity at the onset of seizure-like events in entorhinal cortex slices. J Neurosci 37:10398–10407. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3906-16.2017 pmid:28947576
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Lidster K, et al.
    (2016) Opportunities for improving animal welfare in rodent models of epilepsy and seizures. J Neurosci Methods 260:2–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Lillis KP,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Mail M,
    4. Zhao GQ,
    5. Berdichevsky Y,
    6. Bacskai B,
    7. Staley KJ
    (2015) Evolution of network synchronization during early epileptogenesis parallels synaptic circuit alterations. J Neurosci 35:9920–9934. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4007-14.2015 pmid:26156993
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Losing P,
    2. Niturad CE,
    3. Harrer M,
    4. Reckendorf CMZ,
    5. Schatz T,
    6. Sinske D,
    7. Lerche H,
    8. Maljevic S,
    9. Knoll B
    (2017) SRF modulates seizure occurrence, activity induced gene transcription and hippocampal circuit reorganization in the mouse pilocarpine epilepsy model. Mol Brain 10:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13041-017-0310-2 pmid:28716058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Love MI,
    2. Huber W,
    3. Anders S
    (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 pmid:25516281
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Mahadevan A,
    2. Codadu NK,
    3. Parrish RR
    (2022) Xenon LFP analysis platform is a novel graphical user interface for analysis of local field potential from large-scale MEA recordings. Front Neurosci 16:904931. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.904931 pmid:35844228
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Matovu D,
    2. Cavalheiro EA
    (2022) Differences in evolution of epileptic seizures and topographical distribution of tissue damage in selected limbic structures between male and female rats submitted to the pilocarpine model. Front Neurol 13:802587. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.802587 pmid:35449517
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. McHugh JC,
    2. Delanty N
    (2008) Epidemiology and classification of epilepsy: gender comparisons. Int Rev Neurobiol 83:11–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(08)00002-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Mertz C,
    2. Krarup S,
    3. Jensen CD,
    4. Lindholm SEH,
    5. Kjaer C,
    6. Pinborg LH,
    7. Bak LK
    (2020) Aspects of cAMP signaling in epileptogenesis and seizures and its potential as drug target. Neurochem Res 45:1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02853-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Mielke K,
    2. Brecht S,
    3. Dorst A,
    4. Herdegen T
    (1999) Activity and expression of JNK1, p38 and ERK kinases, c-Jun N-terminal phosphorylation, and c-jun promoter binding in the adult rat brain following kainate-induced seizures. Neuroscience 91:471–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00667-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Morgan JI,
    2. Cohen DR,
    3. Hempstead JL,
    4. Curran T
    (1987) Mapping patterns of c-fos expression in the central nervous system after seizure. Science 237:192–197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3037702
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Ohno Y
    (2018) Astrocytic Kir4.1 potassium channels as a novel therapeutic target for epilepsy and mood disorders. Neural Regen Res 13:651–652. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.230355 pmid:29722316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Okamoto OK,
    2. Janjoppi L,
    3. Bonone FM,
    4. Pansani AP,
    5. da Silva AV,
    6. Scorza FA,
    7. Cavalheiro EA
    (2010) Whole transcriptome analysis of the hippocampus: toward a molecular portrait of epileptogenesis. BMC Genomics 11:230. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-230 pmid:20377889
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. O'Leary H,
    2. Vanderlinden L,
    3. Southard L,
    4. Castano A,
    5. Saba LM,
    6. Benke TA
    (2020) Transcriptome analysis of rat dorsal hippocampal CA1 after an early life seizure induced by kainic acid. Epilepsy Res 161:106283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106283 pmid:32062370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Orsini A,
    2. Zara F,
    3. Striano P
    (2018) Recent advances in epilepsy genetics. Neurosci Lett 667:4–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2017.05.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Palmer TM,
    2. Gettys TW,
    3. Jacobson KA,
    4. Stiles GL
    (1994) Desensitization of the canine A2a adenosine receptor: delineation of multiple processes. Mol Pharmacol 45:1082–1094.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  57. ↵
    1. Papasavvas CA,
    2. Parrish RR,
    3. Trevelyan AJ
    (2020) Propagating activity in neocortex, mediated by gap junctions and modulated by extracellular potassium. eNeuro 7. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0387-19.2020 pmid:32098762
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Parrish RR,
    2. Codadu NK,
    3. Racca C,
    4. Trevelyan AJ
    (2018) Pyramidal cell activity levels affect the polarity of activity-induced gene transcription changes in interneurons. J Neurophysiol 120:2358–2367. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00287.2018 pmid:30110232
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Parrish RR,
    2. Codadu NK,
    3. Mackenzie-Gray Scott C,
    4. Trevelyan AJ
    (2019) Feedforward inhibition ahead of ictal wavefronts is provided by both parvalbumin- and somatostatin-expressing interneurons. J Physiol 597:2297–2314. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP277749 pmid:30784081
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Pitkanen A,
    2. Lukasiuk K,
    3. Dudek FE,
    4. Staley KJ
    (2015) Epileptogenesis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a022822 pmid:26385090
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Ryley Parrish R,
    2. Albertson AJ,
    3. Buckingham SC,
    4. Hablitz JJ,
    5. Mascia KL,
    6. Davis Haselden W,
    7. Lubin FD
    (2013) Status epilepticus triggers early and late alterations in brain-derived neurotrophic factor and NMDA glutamate receptor Grin2b DNA methylation levels in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 248:602–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.029 pmid:23811393
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Sanz E,
    2. Bean JC,
    3. Carey DP,
    4. Quintana A,
    5. McKnight GS
    (2019) RiboTag: ribosomal tagging strategy to analyze cell-type-specific mRNA expression in vivo. Curr Protoc Neurosci 88:e77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpns.77 pmid:31216392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Shan W,
    2. Nagai T,
    3. Tanaka M,
    4. Itoh N,
    5. Furukawa-Hibi Y,
    6. Nabeshima T,
    7. Sokabe M,
    8. Yamada K
    (2018) Neuronal PAS domain protein 4 (Npas4) controls neuronal homeostasis in pentylenetetrazole-induced epilepsy through the induction of Homer1a. J Neurochem 145:19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.14274
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Sheng HZ,
    2. Fields RD,
    3. Nelson PG
    (1993) Specific regulation of immediate early genes by patterned neuronal activity. J Neurosci Res 35:459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.490350502
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Sheth S,
    2. Brito R,
    3. Mukherjea D,
    4. Rybak LP,
    5. Ramkumar V
    (2014) Adenosine receptors: expression, function and regulation. Int J Mol Sci 15:2024–2052. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15022024 pmid:24477263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Soon HR,
    2. Gaunt JR,
    3. Bansal VA,
    4. Lenherr C,
    5. Sze SK,
    6. Ch'ng TH
    (2023) Seizure enhances SUMOylation and zinc-finger transcriptional repression in neuronal nuclei. iScience 26:107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107707 pmid:37694138
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Steinlein OK
    (2014) Calcium signaling and epilepsy. Cell Tissue Res 357:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-014-1849-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. Striano P,
    2. Minassian BA
    (2020) From genetic testing to precision medicine in epilepsy. Neurotherapeutics 17:609–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-020-00835-4 pmid:31981099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Sun Q,
    2. Xu W,
    3. Piao J,
    4. Su J,
    5. Ge T,
    6. Cui R,
    7. Yang W,
    8. Li B
    (2022) Transcription factors are potential therapeutic targets in epilepsy. J Cell Mol Med 26:4875–4885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.17518 pmid:36065764
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Thouta S,
    2. Waldbrook MG,
    3. Lin S,
    4. Mahadevan A,
    5. Mezeyova J,
    6. Soriano M,
    7. Versi P,
    8. Goodchild SJ,
    9. Parrish RR
    (2022) Pharmacological determination of the fractional block of Nav channels required to impair neuronal excitability and ex vivo seizures. Front Cell Neurosci 16:964691. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2022.964691 pmid:36246527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Trevelyan AJ,
    2. Graham RT,
    3. Parrish RR,
    4. Codadu NK
    (2023) Synergistic positive feedback mechanisms underlying seizure initiation. Epilepsy Curr 23:38–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/15357597221127163 pmid:36923333
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Vezzani A,
    2. Conti M,
    3. De Luigi A,
    4. Ravizza T,
    5. Moneta D,
    6. Marchesi F,
    7. De Simoni MG
    (1999) Interleukin-1beta immunoreactivity and microglia are enhanced in the rat hippocampus by focal kainate application: functional evidence for enhancement of electrographic seizures. J Neurosci 19:5054–5065. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-12-05054.1999 pmid:10366638
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Wang D,
    2. Ren M,
    3. Guo J,
    4. Yang G,
    5. Long X,
    6. Hu R,
    7. Shen W,
    8. Wang X,
    9. Zeng K
    (2014) The inhibitory effects of Npas4 on seizures in pilocarpine-induced epileptic rats. PLoS One 9:e115801. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115801 pmid:25536221
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Wang G,
    2. Zhu Z,
    3. Xu D,
    4. Sun L
    (2020) Advances in understanding CREB signaling-mediated regulation of the pathogenesis and progression of epilepsy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 196:106018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106018
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. ↵
    1. Wolinski P,
    2. Ksiazek-Winiarek D,
    3. Glabinski A
    (2022) Cytokines and neurodegeneration in epileptogenesis. Brain Sci 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12030380 pmid:35326336
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Yu G
    (2018) Using meshes for MeSH term enrichment and semantic analyses. Bioinformatics 34:3766–3767. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty410
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  77. ↵
    1. Yu G,
    2. Wang LG,
    3. Han Y,
    4. He QY
    (2012) clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16:284–287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118 pmid:22455463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Zhang CL,
    2. Dreier JP,
    3. Heinemann U
    (1995) Paroxysmal epileptiform discharges in temporal lobe slices after prolonged exposure to low magnesium are resistant to clinically used anticonvulsants. Epilepsy Res 20:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-1211(94)00067-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Ye X,
    4. Bian L
    (2018) Bioinformatics analysis of microarray profiling identifies that the miR-203-3p target Ppp2ca aggravates seizure activity in mice. J Mol Neurosci 66:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-018-1145-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. ↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Liu T,
    3. Sun X,
    4. Mu X,
    5. Zhu G,
    6. Xiao T,
    7. Zhao M,
    8. Zhao C
    (2017) CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 reverses the neurogenesis promoted by enriched environment and suppresses long-term seizure activity in adult rats of temporal lobe epilepsy. Behav Brain Res 322:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.014
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  81. ↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Huang D,
    3. Zhao Z,
    4. Lu C
    (2021) Bioinformatic analysis identifies potential key genes of epilepsy. PLoS One 16:e0254326. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254326 pmid:34555062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Harald Sontheimer, University of Virginia

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Stefanie Robel, Michelle Olsen.

Both referees agree that the required revisions are

The current manuscript entitled 'RNA sequencing demonstrates ex vivo neocortical transcriptomic changes induced by epileptiform activity in male and female mice' has characterized transcriptional changes in gene expression in a newly developed an ex vivo seizure model. Here, over 100 genes were significantly differentially expressed following three hours of 4AP treatment in male and female neocortical tissue slices. This included a set of immediate early genes and several previously characterized epilepsy genes, including genes of the Mapk, Tnf and neuroinflammatory pathways. These findings are discussed in the context of the utility of simple model systems for understanding seizures and seizure induced transcriptional changes. Generally, this is a well-written, straightforward manuscript that provides acute seizure transcriptional data to the field. The ex-vivo model system provides a useful approach for comparison to other ex-vivo approaches, slice ephys, multi-electrode array, and optogenetic studies, and may be used as a resource along with in vivo preclinical model and human status epilepticus data for pharmaceutical target development. Limitations of the current article are detailed below.

Major

1) IPA analysis was useful for validating dataset was related to epilsepy, would also be useful to compare to with human or mouse status epilepticus transcriptional data set, at a minimum diagramming overlapping changing gene expression with another model system

2) No validation by qPCR of any of the targets

3) Limitations worth discussing -

a. utility of using a second pharmacological approach to induce seizures to delineate 4AP targets vs. general seizure driven transcripts

b. discuss why the focus on the cortex and not the hippocampus/entorhinal cortex? Would have been useful to compare cortex/hippocampus, are there region specific differences?

c. Given the experiments were evaluating acute response to 4AP, a ribotag approach, which evaluates dynamic regulation of gene expression would have been more relevant. For example, it is likely many more dynamically regulated genes were downregulated than identified because the investigator looking at total pool of existing RNAs.

4) As it relates to the point above, the investigators do not clarify if they performed RNA sequencing on total RNA or polyadenylated mRNA

5) Consider adding a paragraph to the introduction that discusses other cell populations in the CNS that are impacted by acute seizure activity. This may provide additional context as the experiments performed are in bulk tissue slices.

Minor editorial edits

• By convention, all mouse genes should have first letter capitalized, following letters lower case and italicized. When referring to mouse protein, it should be the same, but no italics

• Paragraph slice preparation - change word 'killed' to 'euthanized'

• Reference Liao, Smyth, and Shi 2019 missing from references section

• Cite reference/ for 100 uM 4AP to induces seizure activity

• Useful to add annotated function of each gene/protein in Table 1

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 5
May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
RNA Sequencing Demonstrates Ex Vivo Neocortical Transcriptomic Changes Induced by Epileptiform Activity in Male and Female Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
RNA Sequencing Demonstrates Ex Vivo Neocortical Transcriptomic Changes Induced by Epileptiform Activity in Male and Female Mice
Alec J. Vaughan, Laura J. McMeekin, Kutter Hine, Isaac W. Stubbs, Neela K. Codadu, Simon Cockell, Jonathon T. Hill, Rita Cowell, Andrew J. Trevelyan, R. Ryley Parrish
eNeuro 25 April 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0520-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0520-23.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
RNA Sequencing Demonstrates Ex Vivo Neocortical Transcriptomic Changes Induced by Epileptiform Activity in Male and Female Mice
Alec J. Vaughan, Laura J. McMeekin, Kutter Hine, Isaac W. Stubbs, Neela K. Codadu, Simon Cockell, Jonathon T. Hill, Rita Cowell, Andrew J. Trevelyan, R. Ryley Parrish
eNeuro 25 April 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0520-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0520-23.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • epilepsy
  • gene expression
  • seizure
  • sex differences

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Breaching the blood-brain interface: Vasoactive neurons contact capillary vessels of the brain clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus
  • Transcriptional Changes Fade Prior to Long-Term Memory for Sensitization of the Aplysia Siphon-Withdrawal Reflex.
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Functional-Structural Coupling: Brain Reorganization in Presbycusis Is Related to Cognitive Impairment
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.