Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Negative Results, Disorders of the Nervous System

Altered Hippocampal Activation in Seizure-Prone CACNA2D2 Knock-out Mice

Alyssa B. Danis, Ashlynn A. Gallagher, Ashley N. Anderson, Arielle Isakharov, Kathleen A. Beeson and Eric Schnell
eNeuro 15 May 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0486-23.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0486-23.2024
Alyssa B. Danis
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
2Research and Development Service, Portland VA Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashlynn A. Gallagher
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
2Research and Development Service, Portland VA Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ashlynn A. Gallagher
Ashley N. Anderson
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
2Research and Development Service, Portland VA Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ashley N. Anderson
Arielle Isakharov
3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arielle Isakharov
Kathleen A. Beeson
3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kathleen A. Beeson
Eric Schnell
1Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
2Research and Development Service, Portland VA Health Care System, Portland, Oregon 97239
3Neuroscience Graduate Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eric Schnell
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Granule cell expression of the activity-dependent genes c-fos and ΔFosB. A, Example images from 4-week-old WT and CACNA2D2 KO mouse hippocampal sections, demonstrating c-fos+ granule cells (red) sparsely located throughout the GCL and near the granule cell–molecular layer border. Cell nuclei were visualized using DAPI stain (blue). B, Quantification of c-fos+ cell density (n = 8, 7; p = 0.40). C, One KO mouse excluded from baseline analysis, due to global dentate c-fos expression, suggestive of recent seizure. D, Lower power images of c-fos staining for WT and KO mice. E, Representative ΔFosB expression (green) in WT and CACNA2D2 KO dentate gyrus in mice at baseline.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Granule cell activation after handling-induced convulsions. A, Images of c-fos expression (red) 1 h after gentle handling in representative WT and KO mice. Cell nuclei were visualized using DAPI stain (blue). B, Gentle handling caused convulsive seizures in CACNA2D2 KO, but not WT, mice (n = 4, 4; ***p < 0.0001). C, Granule cell c-fos expression was reduced in CACNA2D2 mice after handling-induced convulsions (n = 4, 4; *p = 0.023). D, Images of ΔFosB expression (green) 1 h after gentle handling in representative WT and KO mice. E, Granule cell ΔFosB expression was increased in CACNA2D2 mice after handling-induced convulsions (n = 4, 4; **p = 0.009).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    CACNA2D2 KO mice have a reduced threshold for PTZ -induced granule cell activation. A, Dentate c-fos expression (red) after low-dose (30 mg/kg) PTZ administration in WT and KO mice. B, Maximum seizure intensity after PTZ (n = 8, 8; ***p = 0.005). C, c-fos+ cell density after PTZ (n = 8, 8; *p = 0.028).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Hilar mossy cell and CA3 cell densities in CACNA2D2 KO mice. A, Hilar mossy cells were identified as calretinin-positive cells (red; arrows) located within the hilar space and distinct from the small calretinin-positive immature granule cells in the SGZ. Mossy cell axons appear as a calretinin-stained band in the IML, just outside of the GCL (blue, DAPI). B, Quantification of hilar mossy cell density (n = 8, 8; *p = 0.037). C, CA3 pyramidal cell layer seen in cross section, visualized using DAPI nuclear stain (blue). White lines designate three separate locations at which CA3 pyramidal layer width was measured. D, Quantification of CA3 pyramidal cell layer width (n = 6, 6; p = 0.94). E, Quantification of CA3 pyramidal cell layer density (n = 6, 6; p = 0.46).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Mossy fiber sprouting is absent in CACNA2D2 KO mice. A, Granule cell mossy fiber axon terminals in WT and KO mice were identified by staining for the mossy fiber terminal marker, ZnT3 (magenta). GCL highlighted with DAPI (blue). B, ZnT3-stained terminals were exclusively found within the hilar space, and not within the IML, which would have indicated pathological retrograde sprouting.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Hippocampal cell proliferation and granule cell neurogenesis are unchanged in juvenile CACNA2D2 KO mice. A, Mitotic cells in the dentate SGZ identified by the proliferation-associated nuclear marker Ki67 (red) in WT and KO mice; GCL nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). B, Immature granule cell neurons identified by expression of the microtubule-associated protein Dcx (green) in WT and KO dentate sections. C, Quantification of Ki67+ cell density (n = 6, 6; p = 0.11). D, Quantification of Dcx+ cell density using staining fluorescence intensity in the GCL (n = 6, 6; p = 0.58).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Parvalbumin interneuron staining in WT and CACNA2D2 KO mice. A, Confocal image projections of parvalbumin-stained (PV, red) dentate gyrus tissue from WT and KO mice. B, C, Quantification of PV+ cell density within both the GCL (B; n = 6, 6; p = 0.29) and dentate hilus (C; n = 6, 6; p = 0.97). D, Confocal image projections of PV-stained hippocampal CA3 pyramidal cell layers from WT and KO mice. E, Quantification of PV+ cell density in the CA3 pyramidal cell layer (n = 6, 6; p = 0.40).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Glial activation is not changed in CACNA2D2 KO mice. A, Confocal stack image projections of GFAP-stained dentate GCLs (DAPI, blue) from WT and KO mice. B, Quantification of GFAP+ cell densities (n = 6, 6; p = 0.29). C, Confocal image of Iba1-stained (red) dentate molecular layer tissue from WT and KO mice. D, Quantification of Iba1+ cell densities (n = 6, 6; p = 0.88).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Statistical comparison between males and females for datasets

    ComparisonData structureStatistical testDifference between meansPower (95% confidence intervals)
    WT M vs F
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell densityNon-normal (W = 0.7405)Mann–Whitney test0.7857Rank sums 24 vs 12
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell density (including outlier)Non-normal (W = 0.7405)Mann–Whitney test0.7857Rank sums 24 vs 12
    Baseline c-fos+ semi-lunar cell densityNormal (0.9474)Unpaired t test0.9296−697.0 to 751.5
    Baseline c-fos+ granule cell densityNon-normal (W + 0.7551)Mann–Whitney test0.3929Rank sums 26 vs 10
    Handling seizure scoret test invalid since all values were the sameMann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 5 vs 5
    Handling c-fos+ cell density (WT vs KO)n too smallMann–Whitney test0.3333Rank sums 3 vs 7
    PTZ seizure scoreNon-normal (W = 0.6840)Mann–Whitney test0.625Rank sums 20.50 vs 15.50
    PTZ c-fos+ cell densityNon-normal (W = 0.6676)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 22 vs 14
    Baseline VENTRAL c-fos densityNon-normal (W = 0.7507)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 10 vs 11
    PTZ VENTRAL c-fos densityNon-normal (W = 0.7304)Mann–Whitney test0.7857Rank sums 24 vs 12
    Handling VENTRAL c-fos densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.2830−5,498 to 11,114
    Baseline ΔFosB densityNormal (W = 0.8406)Unpaired t test0.9736−473.5 to 486.5
    PTZ ΔFosB densityNormal (W = 0.7964)Unpaired t test0.7861−341.1 to 430.6
    Handling ΔFosB densityn too smallMann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 5 vs 5
    Calretinin+ cell densityNormal (W = 0.8175)Unpaired t test0.2254−200.7 to 57.89
    CA3 pyramidal cell layer thicknessNormal (W = 0.8107)Unpaired t test0.33−49.22 to 114.6
    CA3 pyramidal cell densityNormal (W = 0.8614)Unpaired t test0.5758−193.0 to 301.3
    Mossy fiber sproutingNon-normal (W = 0.7500)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 11 vs 10
    Ki67+ cell densityNormal (W = 0.8941)Unpaired t test0.3822−18,299 to 38,292
    DCX intensityNormal (W = 0.8491)Unpaired t test0.7252−1,094 to 832.1
    PV+ cell density in the GCLNormal (W = 0.9792)Unpaired t test0.8369−1,212 to 1,421
    PV+ cell density in the hilusNormal (W = 0.9130)Unpaired t test0.2856−222.1 to 576.1
    PV+ cell density in CA3Non-normal (W = 0.7626)Mann–Whitney test0.7Rank sums 12 vs 9
    GFAP+ cell densityNormal (W = 0.9643)Unpaired t test0.4045−6,499 to 13,058
    GFAP intensityNormal (W = 0.9075)Unpaired t test0.6164−100.5 to 67.64
    Iba1 cell densityNormal (W = 0.7789)Unpaired t test0.2115−122.6 to 37.11
    KO M vs F
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell densityNormalUnpaired t test0.9984−6,321 to 6,331
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell density (including outlier)Non-normal (W = 0.6249)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 18 vs 18
    Baseline c-fos+ semi-lunar cell densityNormal (W = 0.7743)Unpaired t test0.4724−2,277 to 1,220
    Baseline c-fos+ granule cell densityNormal (W = 0.8128)Unpaired t test0.7769−4,053 to 5,121
    Handling seizure scoren too smallUnpaired t test0.6667−3.202 to 2.535
    Handling c-fos+ cell density (WT vs KO)n too smallUnpaired t test0.7693−8.118 to 6.944
    PTZ seizure scoreNon-normal (W = 0.6298)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 18.50 vs 17.50
    PTZ c-fos+ cell densityNormal (W = 0.7855)Unpaired t test0.5879−128,579 to 207,079
    Baseline VENTRAL c-fos densityNon-normal (W = 0.6567)Mann–Whitney test0.5333Rank sums 12 vs 9
    PTZ VENTRAL c-fos densityNon-normal (W = 0.7307)Mann–Whitney test0.1143Rank sums 12 vs 24
    Handling VENTRAL c-fos densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.7993−8,964 to 7,833
    Baseline ΔFosB densityNon-normal (W = 0.6446)Mann–Whitney test>0.9999Rank sums 16 vs 12
    PTZ ΔFosB densityNon-normal (W = 0.6819)Mann–Whitney test0.6857Rank sums 16 vs 20
    Handling ΔFosB densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.8803−1,395 to 1,510
    Calretinin+ cell densityNormal (W = 0.9085)Unpaired t test0.028  22.99 to 281.9
    CA3 pyramidal cell layer thicknessn too smallUnpaired t test0.9133−68.89 to 74.90
    CA3 pyramidal cell densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.4075−176.6 to 353.1
    Mossy fiber sproutingn too smallUnpaired t test0.3552−0.6859 to 0.3109
    Ki67+ cell densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.4626−45,218 to 24,765
    DCX intensityn too smallUnpaired t test0.772−989.4 to 790.7
    PV+ cell density in the GCLn too smallUnpaired t test0.0969−1,858 to 232.3
    PV+ cell density in the hilusn too smallUnpaired t test0.1567−396.1 to 90.80
    PV+ cell density in CA3n too smallUnpaired t test0.1226−17,245 to 3,005
    GFAP+ cell densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.8673−8,163 to 7,179
    GFAP intensityn too smallUnpaired t test0.3264−125.3 to 53.38
    Iba1 cell densityn too smallUnpaired t test0.8081−40.60 to 48.97
    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Statistical table

    ComparisonData structureStatistical testDifference between meansPower (95% confidence intervals)
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell densityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.6411)Mann–Whitney test1.603 (medians)Rank sums 56 vs 64
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell density (including outlier)Non-normal distribution (W = 0.4324)Mann–Whitney test1.964 (medians)Rank sums 56 vs 80
    Baseline c-fos+ semilunar cell densityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.6780)Mann–Whitney test19.14 (medians)Rank sums 58 vs 62
    Baseline c-fos+ granule cell densityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.6960)Mann–Whitney test1,649 (medians)Rank sums 57 vs 63
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell density: ventralNormal distributionUnpaired t test315−853 to 1,482
    Baseline c-fos+ total cell density: ventral (including outlier)Non-normal distribution (W = 0.5413)Mann–Whitney test643 (medians)Rank sums 33 vs 45
    Baseline ΔFosB GCL intensityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.7748)Mann–Whitney test−83.13 (medians)Rank sums 46 vs 45
    Baseline ΔFosB GCL intensity (including outlier)Non-normal distribution (W = 0.6061)Mann–Whitney test−76.98 (medians)Rank sums 46 vs 59
    Handling seizure scoreNormal distributionUnpaired t test  3.250  2.638 to 3.862
    Handling c-fos+ cell density (WT vs KO)Normal distributionUnpaired t test−3.834−6.919 to 0.7493
    Handling c-fos+ cell density: ventralNormal distributionUnpaired t test−3,909−7,169 to −650
    Handling ΔFosB intensityNormal distributionUnpaired t test468  167 to 768
    WT: baseline vs handled c-fos+ cell densityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.6411)Mann–Whitney test−0.278 (medians)Rank sums 54 vs 24
    KO: baseline vs handled c-fos+ cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test−5.895−9.456 to −2.334
    PTZ seizure scoreNon-normal distribution (W = 0.6068)Mann–Whitney test  5.000 (medians)Rank sums 37.5 vs 98.5
    PTZ c-fos+ cell densityNon-normal distribution (W = 0.7440)Mann–Whitney test  71,400 (medians)Rank sums 47 vs 89
    PTZ c-fos+ cell density: ventralNon-normal distribution (W = 0.7572)Mann–Whitney test  57,100 (medians)Rank sums 47 vs 89
    PTZ ΔFosB GCL intensityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  455−11 to 921
    PTZ high c-fos vs low c-fosNormal distributionUnpaired t test  3.000−12.6 to 18.6
    Calretinin+ cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  107.3  7.566 to 207.0
    Hilar cross-sectional areaNormal distributionUnpaired t test  0.005−0.015 to 0.005
    GCL cross-sectional areaNormal distributionUnpaired t test−0.011−0.041 to 0.018
    CA3 pyramidal cell layer thicknessNon-normal distribution (W = 0.575)Mann–Whitney test  5.75 (medians)Rank sums 38 vs 40
    CA3 pyramidal cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  47.00−88.44 to 182.4
    Mossy fiber sproutingNon-normal distribution (W = 0.7013)Mann–Whitney test−0.375 (medians)Rank sums 51.5 vs 26.5
    Ki67+ cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  13.61−3.455 to 30.67
    DCX intensityNormal distributionUnpaired t test−120.0−585.3 to 345.4
    PV+ cell density in the GCLNormal distributionUnpaired t test  356.3−348.6 to 1,061
    PV+ cell density in the hilusNormal distributionUnpaired t test  4.014−196.5 to 204.6
    PV+ cell density in CA3Normal distributionUnpaired t test  3.285−4.953 to 11.52
    GFAP+ cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  2.460−2.207 to 7.126
    GFAP intensityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  8.395−38.25 to 55.04
    Iba1 cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  2.630−36.21 to 41.47
    Mac-2 cell densityNormal distributionUnpaired t test  524−178 to 1,225
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 5
May 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Altered Hippocampal Activation in Seizure-Prone CACNA2D2 Knock-out Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Altered Hippocampal Activation in Seizure-Prone CACNA2D2 Knock-out Mice
Alyssa B. Danis, Ashlynn A. Gallagher, Ashley N. Anderson, Arielle Isakharov, Kathleen A. Beeson, Eric Schnell
eNeuro 15 May 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0486-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0486-23.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Altered Hippocampal Activation in Seizure-Prone CACNA2D2 Knock-out Mice
Alyssa B. Danis, Ashlynn A. Gallagher, Ashley N. Anderson, Arielle Isakharov, Kathleen A. Beeson, Eric Schnell
eNeuro 15 May 2024, 11 (5) ENEURO.0486-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0486-23.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alpha-2-delta
  • calcium channels
  • dentate gyrus
  • epilepsy
  • hippocampus

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Negative Results

  • The Single-Prolonged Stress Model Fails to Produce Behavioral or Corticosterone Alterations in Rats
  • Partial Deletion of Cxcl12 from Hippocampal Cajal–Retzius Cells Does Not Disrupt Dentate Gyrus Development or Neurobehaviors
  • Expression of HDAC3-Y298H Point Mutant in Medial Habenula Cholinergic Neurons Has No Effect on Cocaine-Induced Behaviors
Show more Research Article: Negative Results

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Functional-structural coupling: brain reorganization in presbycusis is related to cognitive impairment
  • Investigating the Role of Cortical Microglia in a Mouse Model of Viral Infection-Induced Seizures
  • GABAB Receptor signaling in CA1 Pyramidal Cells is not Regulated by Aging in the APP/PS1 Mouse Model of Amyloid Pathology
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.