Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses

Divya Gulati and Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, 11 (4) ENEURO.0116-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024
Divya Gulati
Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Divya Gulati
Supratim Ray
Centre for Neuroscience, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Supratim Ray
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Change in power after stimulus presentation pooled across all stimulus conditions. Subject-averaged time-frequency change in power spectra up to 150 Hz for all 64 channels (frequency, 0–150 Hz; vertical axis and time, −500 to 1,300 ms, horizontal axis). The plots are arranged according to the 64-channel layout (actiCap) with FCz as the reference electrode, unipolar referencing. Stimulus is presented during 0–800 ms, indicated by dashed vertical lines. Color bar indicates log power ratio in decibels (dB). A, In response to the presentation of the visual grating stimuli. B, In response to the presentation of the auditory grating stimuli. The star-marked electrodes in the topoplots at the bottom show the electrodes used for further analysis.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Subject- and electrode-averaged change in power compared with baseline (−500 to 0 ms), pooled across all stimulus conditions with two different reference schemes. Results are shown for the unipolar reference scheme (left) and bipolar (right). The top row in A and the first two in B and C are in response to visual stimuli. The bottom row in A and the last two in B and C are in response to the auditory stimuli. Electrodes used for averaging in A and B are highlighted with black dots in scalp maps shown in C. A, Time-frequency change in power. Dashed vertical lines (black) represent stimulus onset and offset. B, Power spectra [first and third row panels—red trace is the stimulus period (250–750 ms), and the green trace is the baseline period (−500 to 0 ms)] and change in power spectra versus frequency (second and fourth row panels, blue traces). The solid traces represent the mean across subjects, and thickness represents SEM. Dashed vertical lines represent narrowband gamma (20–66 Hz, blue) and broadband high-gamma (70–150 Hz, cyan). Colored squares at the bottom represent the significance of differences in means (paired t test—purple, p values between 0.01 and 0.05; pink, p < 0.01). C, Scalp maps of 64 unipolar electrodes (left) and 114 bipolar electrodes (right). The first and third rows show the change in power for frequencies 20–66 Hz. The second and fourth rows show the change in power for frequencies 70–150 Hz. The color bar represents the log power ratio in decibels.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Visual and auditory responses for individual subjects. Change in time-frequency power spectra for males (A) and females (B). The top row represents the results in response to visual stimuli, and the bottom represents the results in response to auditory stimuli. Subjects are ordered horizontally based on the decreasing high-gamma activity in 70–150 Hz for the auditory protocol, starting from the left. The response is averaged across selected occipital and temporal electrodes (highlighted in the inset of Fig. 1) for respective protocols. The color bar represents the log power ratio in decibels. Empty plots refer to subjects rejected from the analysis (refer to Materials and Methods, Artifact rejection for more details).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Auditory-induced gamma is not correlated with visually induced gamma. Scatter plots for change in power in response to visual stimuli versus auditory stimuli. A, For narrowband gamma power averaged across electrodes for the respective protocol (as shown in Fig. 1 inset). B, For broadband high-gamma power averaged across electrodes. C, For narrowband gamma power for electrode with maximum change in power. D, For broadband high-gamma power for electrode with maximum change in power. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and p value are mentioned at the bottom right in each panel. Note the difference in axis limits across the panels. E, Violin plots showing the distribution of change in power from baseline for different gamma frequency ranges (NB refers to narrowband gamma and BB refers to broadband high-gamma) during different tasks. The inset box plot indicates the median (black line), mean (magenta line), box (spanning the edges of the second and third quartile), and whiskers from box edge to the farthest point at 1.5 IQR (interquartile range) with any outliers plotted as distinct points. The significance of the unpaired t test (with unequal variance) is indicated at the top of the violin plots.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    No stimulus selectivity was observed for either of the induced gamma(s). Change in time-frequency power spectrum from baseline for different stimulus conditions. A, In visual modality. B, In auditory modality. Power is averaged across selected electrodes for each modality. Dashed vertical lines (black) represent stimulus onset and offset. The color bar represents the log power ratio in decibels.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Subject-averaged time-frequency change in power spectra for the (A) eye-open and (B) eye-close auditory tasks—same format as Figure 1.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 4
April 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses
Divya Gulati, Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, 11 (4) ENEURO.0116-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Auditory and Visual Gratings Elicit Distinct Gamma Responses
Divya Gulati, Supratim Ray
eNeuro 11 April 2024, 11 (4) ENEURO.0116-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0116-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • auditory
  • EEG
  • gamma
  • gratings
  • high-gamma
  • visual

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Disrupting motor cortical regional activity during motor sequence skill training impairs human motor visuomotor skill acquisition and learning that is not sequence-specific
  • Whole-Brain Mapping of Neuronal Activity Associated with Vocal Socialization Behaviors in Adult Mice
  • Effect of Functionally Selective Dopamine D1 Receptor Agonists on Complex Cognitive Processes in a Rodent Touchscreen Operant Chamber Task
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Postnatal Development of Pyramidal Neurons Excitability and Synaptic Inputs in Mouse Gustatory Cortical Circuits
  • Refinement of Locomotor Activity during Development Is Correlated to Increased Dopaminergic Signaling in Larval Zebrafish
  • Microglial morphological complexity in the piriform cortex is associated with olfactory aversion following chronic stress
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.