Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Divergent Changes in PBN Excitability in a Mouse Model of Neuropathic Pain

María L. Torruella-Suárez, Benjamin Neugebauer, Krystal Flores-Felix, Asaf Keller, Yarimar Carrasquillo and Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 8 February 2024, 11 (3) ENEURO.0416-23.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0416-23.2024
María L. Torruella-Suárez
1National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin Neugebauer
1National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Krystal Flores-Felix
2Department of Neurobiology and UM-MIND, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asaf Keller
2Department of Neurobiology and UM-MIND, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Asaf Keller
Yarimar Carrasquillo
1National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
3National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Cramer
2Department of Neurobiology and UM-MIND, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathan Cramer
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Neuropathic injury model increases spontaneous activity in PBN neurons. A, Mice were used 7–11 d after sciatic cuff surgery for slice electrophysiology in pBN. B, Cuff surgery induced tactile hypersensitivity, but sham surgery had no effect. C, Proportion of spontaneously firing neurons in each firing category from sham (22%, 13/60) and cuff (45%, 24/53) animals. Neuronal properties, including (D) capacitance, (E) input resistance, (F) resting membrane potential, (G) and rheobase, were similar in sham and cuff animals. Anatomical location of the recorded neurons from (H) sham and (I) cuff animals. Gray squares: quiescent cells. Pink circles: spontaneously firing cells. Bonferroni corrected t test: ****p < 0.0001. χ2 test: #p < 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    After discharges do not reflect intrinsic membrane properties of PBN neurons. A, Experimental design for investigating afterdischarges. CCI-ION was used as a model for peripheral nerve injury and electrophysiological data were acquired from horizontal sections through the PBN. B, CCI-ION results in mechanical hypersensitivity in both sexes that persisted for at least 2 weeks after injury (C). Summary of the number of neurons from sham and CCI mice tested with different current injection protocols in attempts to evoke afterdischarges. We recorded from a total of 12 neurons from sham and 11 neurons from CCI mice, but some PBN neurons were tested with multiple protocols. Examples of each protocol include square pulses of fixed duration and increasing magnitude (D), depolarizing sinusoidal currents (E), and square pulses of fixed intensity and increasing duration (F). Afterdischarges, such as the one following the first depolarizing square pulse in F, were rarely observed and could not be consistently evoked, in any PBN neuron. Mixed-effects analysis with Sidak's multiple-comparisons test, *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Phasic GABAB inhibition of inhibitory afferents in PBN is enhanced after nerve injury. A, Experimental schematic. B, Samples of electrically evoked IPSCs in a PBN neuron from a sham (top) and CCI (bottom) mouse. Each depicts an overlay of 20 responses to paired-pulse stimulation (50 ms interpulse interval). All traces have been baseline corrected. Neither the amplitude (C) or PPR (D) was affected by CCI. E, Sample recordings from sham (top) and CCI neurons (bottom) before and after bath application of the GABAB agonist baclofen (1 μM, red trace). F, As a population, baclofen had no effect on PPR in neurons from sham mice but significantly increased PPR in neurons from CCI-ION mice. In contrast, the GABAB antagonist CGP55845 (1 μM) had no effect on PPR from either group (G,H). Each trace in (E) and (G) are the average of 20 baseline-corrected individual trials, and the stimulus artifact has been truncated vertically for clarity. Wilcoxon matched-pairs test: *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Spontaneous firing frequencies and action potential properties are unaltered in a neuropathic injury model. A, Example traces of spontaneous firing in neurons from sham (black) and cuff (magenta) animals. B, Example action potentials from panel A indicated by horizontal bars. There were no differences between neurons from sham and cuff cells in (C) capacitance, (D) input resistance, (E) firing frequency, (F) action potential threshold, (G) peak, (H) rise time from threshold to peak, (I) decay from peak to 90% of threshold, or (J) total action potential width.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Heterogeneous firing types of PBN neurons. A, Representative traces of RS, LF, and reluctant neurons. B, Representative traces of neurons that did not fit the main firing types. C, Input–frequency and (D) rheobase for each firing type. Intrinsic properties, including (E) capacitance, (F) input resistance, and (G) resting membrane potential were all different between firing types. Data for spontaneous neurons are replicated from Figure 2 for comparison. Each datapoint represents a cell. Bonferroni corrected t test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. Main effect from mixed-effects analysis: ^^p < 0.01, ^^^^p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Neuropathic injury model bidirectionally impacts evoked firing. A, Representative traces of action potentials in RS and LF neurons from sham and cuff animals. B, Quiescent RS neurons were more excitable in sham animals than cuff animals, though (C) rheobase and (D) resting membrane potential were not different. E, Quiescent LF neurons were not impacted by neuropathic injury in either repetitive firing (F) rheobase or (G) resting membrane potential. H, Representative traces of spontaneous firing in RS and LF neurons from sham and cuff animals. I, Input–frequency relationship for RS neurons held at −70 mV. J, Rheobase and initial membrane voltage (K) spontaneous RS neurons. L, Input–frequency relationship for LF neurons held at −70 mV. M, Rheobase and initial membrane voltage (N) spontaneous LF neurons. Data for sham neurons are replicated from Figure 3 for comparison. Main effect from mixed-effects analysis: *p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Intrinsic properties of quiescent and spontaneously active PBN neurons

    QuiescentSpontaneous
    RSLFRSLF
    ShamCuffShamCuffShamCuffShamCuff
    Capacitance (pF)46.85 ± 14.94
    (n = 16)
    55.4 ± 21.08
    (n = 7)
    65.11 ± 23.91
    (n = 25)
    59.84 ± 15.89
    (n = 18)
    46.44 ± 12.59
    (n = 7)
    50.21 ± 23.54
    (n = 6)
    50.05 ± 10.32
    (n = 4)
    59.72 ± 25.83
    (n = 11)
    Rin (MΩ)620.6 ± 212.8
    (n = 16)
    481.7 ± 170.8
    (n = 7)
    458.0 ± 184.0
    (n = 25)
    551.6 ± 264.0
    (n = 18)
    581.8 ± 298.5
    (n = 7)
    563.3 ± 307.5
    (n = 6)
    734.1 ± 344.0
    (n = 4)
    590.7 ± 302.0
    (n = 11)
    Rheobase at native Vrest (pA)14.33 ± 7.76
    (n = 15)
    20.83 ± 9.704
    (n = 6)
    40.71 ± 18.59
    (n = 21)
    37.65 ± 15.12
    (n = 17)
    NANANANA
    Rheobase at −70 mv (pA)33.08 ± 20.37
    (n = 13)
    50.0 ± 42.43
    (n = 7)
    42.37 ± 29.46
    (n = 19)
    40.88 ± 18.31
    (n = 17)
    25.00 ± 7.071
    (n = 6)
    21.67 ± 5.164
    (n = 6)
    46.25 ± 22.50
    (n = 4)
    34.00 ± 20.39
    (n = 10)
    • NA, not applicable.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 3
March 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Divergent Changes in PBN Excitability in a Mouse Model of Neuropathic Pain
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Divergent Changes in PBN Excitability in a Mouse Model of Neuropathic Pain
María L. Torruella-Suárez, Benjamin Neugebauer, Krystal Flores-Felix, Asaf Keller, Yarimar Carrasquillo, Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 8 February 2024, 11 (3) ENEURO.0416-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0416-23.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Divergent Changes in PBN Excitability in a Mouse Model of Neuropathic Pain
María L. Torruella-Suárez, Benjamin Neugebauer, Krystal Flores-Felix, Asaf Keller, Yarimar Carrasquillo, Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 8 February 2024, 11 (3) ENEURO.0416-23.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0416-23.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • afterdischarges
  • GABAB
  • intrinsic properties
  • sciatic
  • trigeminal

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
  • Variation in the Involvement of Hippocampal Pyramidal Cell Subtypes in Spatial Learning Tasks
  • Dentate Granule Cell Capacitance Is Stable across the Light/Dark Cycle
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.