Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Genetically Supported Causality between Brain Structural Connectome and Sleep Duration in Children: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Ruijie Zhang, Liyan Luo, Lu Zhang, Xinao Lin, Chuyan Wu, Feng Jiang and Jimei Wang
eNeuro 4 December 2024, 11 (12) ENEURO.0267-24.2024; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0267-24.2024
Ruijie Zhang
1Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liyan Luo
2Department of Neonatology, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Dali 671000, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu Zhang
1Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xinao Lin
1Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chuyan Wu
3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Feng Jiang
1Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jimei Wang
1Department of Neonatology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jimei Wang
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Certain structural brain connections have been confirmed to influence sleep duration in children. However, the causal relationships between all brain regions and children's sleep duration remain unclear. A two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted using data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to examine the relationships between 206 structural connections and sleep duration in children. Sensitivity analyses were employed to validate the findings and assess the robustness of the causal inferences. Stronger connectivity from the left hemisphere (LH) control network to the accumbens (β = −0.15; 95% CI = [−0.30, −2.88 × 10−3]; p = 0.05) and from the LH somatomotor network to the LH default network (β = −0.18; 95% CI = [−0.34, −0.03]; p = 0.02) in white-matter structural connectivity (SC) were associated with shorter sleep durations. Conversely, increased white-matter SC from the LH dorsal attention network to the thalamus (β = 0.14; 95% CI = [8.45 × 10−4, 0.27]; p = 0.05), from the right hemisphere (RH) control network to the thalamus (β = 0.10; 95% CI = [0.01, 0.19]; p = 0.03), from the RH default network to the thalamus (β = 0.08; 95% CI = [4.53 × 10−3, 0.16]; p = 0.04), from the RH limbic network to the thalamus (β = 0.15; 95% CI = [0.05, 0.26]; p = 3.77 × 10−3), and from the RH somatomotor network to the thalamus (β = 0.20; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.32]; p = 1.63 × 10−3) correlated with longer sleep durations in children. Two-sample Mendelian randomization provides novel insights into the relationships between brain regions and sleep duration in children. Our findings demonstrate a causal relationship between specific brain areas and sleep duration.

  • brain networks
  • children
  • Mendelian randomization
  • sleep duration
  • structural connectivity

Significance Statement

This study explores neurobiological mechanisms underlying sleep regulation in children, revealing causal links between brain structural connectivity and sleep duration through Mendelian randomization. Using genetic variants as instrumental variables, 206 structural connections were analyzed, identifying pathways involving networks such as the dorsal attention, somatomotor, and default mode networks. These findings highlight the role of neural architecture in shaping sleep patterns, advancing understanding of developmental sleep regulation. The results have important implications for pediatric health, offering insights for targeted interventions and biomarkers to enhance sleep quality, ultimately supporting cognitive and behavioral development.

Introduction

Sleep is essential for physical and mental health during childhood development (Astill et al., 2012). Despite recommendations from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine for children aged 6–18 to sleep between 8 and 12 h per night (Paruthi et al., 2016), >90% of school-aged children do not meet these guidelines, with sleep duration decreasing as they approach adolescence (Gradisar et al., 2011). Adolescent sleep patterns are influenced by genetic factors; for instance, genetics account for ∼48% of the variance in sleep spindles (Markovic et al., 2020). Systematic reviews and genetic studies employing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) corroborate that sleep duration in children is also genetically influenced (Marinelli et al., 2016; Kocevska et al., 2021).

Brain structural connectivity (SC) has demonstrated significant genetic correlations with various neuropsychiatric and cognitive traits (Wainberg et al., 2024). However, the influence of SC on sleep duration in children has received less attention. Existing research indicates a relationship between brain networks and children's sleep patterns. For example, connections within the default mode network (DMN), which are prominent during periods of mental rest, are consistently associated with sleep and other neuroregulatory behaviors (Tashjian et al., 2017). Total sleep deprivation has been shown to disrupt interactions between the DMN and core cognitive networks, including the dorsal attention network (DAN), frontoparietal network (FPN), and salience network (SN; Fox et al., 2005; Lei et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2020). However, these studies have focused only on specific brain regions and are often subject to confounding factors. To date, a comprehensive examination of the connection between brain networks and children's sleep duration from a developmental perspective is lacking.

In this study, we aim to address the gap in understanding the causal links between brain SC and sleep duration in children using Mendelian randomization (MR). MR leverages genetic variants, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to infer causal relationships by minimizing the impact of confounding factors (Gupta et al., 2017; Davies et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2022). Since SNPs are randomly assigned, they are less affected by environmental or disease-related influences, providing a more precise understanding compared with traditional observational studies. Through MR, we explore how specific brain networks might influence sleep duration in children. While our findings offer insights into potential regulatory roles of these networks, further studies are needed to validate these results and clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

All the GWAS data utilized in this research were sourced from publicly accessible databases, and no original data were collected for this study. Each of the studies included had received approval from their respective institutional ethics review committees. Additionally, informed consent for both participation and publication was obtained from all participants involved.

Study design

A schematic overview of the study design is depicted in Figure 1. We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) investigation utilizing data from two publicly accessible genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to acquire summary statistics. The three assumptions underlying our experiment are illustrated in Figure 1: (1) Genetic instruments, serving as instrumental variables (IVs), are strongly associated with the exposure variable, namely, the structural connectome. (2) Genetic instruments are not associated with any potential confounders that could affect both the exposure and the outcome (sleep duration in children). (3) The influence of genetic instruments on the outcome is mediated exclusively through the exposure, with no direct effects on the outcome independent of the exposure.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic overview of the study design for investigating the causal relationships between structural connectome measures and sleep duration in children using MR. The diagram outlines the three main assumptions of our Mendelian randomization study: (1) Genetic instruments are strongly associated with the exposure (structural connectome); (2) the genetic instruments are not associated with any confounders that could influence both the exposure and the outcome (sleep duration); and (3) the influence of the genetic instruments on the outcome occurs exclusively through the exposure, with no direct effects on the outcome as independent factors.

All studies involved in the GWAS had previously been approved by the appropriate review boards; therefore, no further ethical approval or participant consent was necessary for this analysis.

Source of GWAS data

Details of the studies and datasets used for analyses are shown in Table 1. Sleep duration in children was reported by parents, including nap times, and recorded in hours. Parents were asked the open-ended question, “How many hours does your child sleep per day, including nap time?” The cohort included children aged 2–14 years of European ancestry, deliberately excluding those under 2 years of age to avoid the sleep development stage and those over 14 to circumvent the adolescent developmental period (Marinelli et al., 2016). The discovery phase used data from five cohorts in four countries (United Kingdom, Spain, Netherlands, Germany), and the replication phase added two cohorts from two additional countries (Netherlands, Finland), making a total of six countries. The GWAS summary statistics can be accessed and downloaded from the Sleep Disorder Knowledge Portal (https://sleep.hugeamp.org/downloads.html).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Details of studies and datasets used for analyses

The network connectivity measures included a total of 206 phenotypic traits (Wainberg et al., 2024). Initially, three hemisphere-level connectivities were assessed: left intrahemisphere, right intrahemisphere, and interhemisphere connectivity. Subsequently, 105 network-level connectivity measures were analyzed, comprising 14 within-network and 91 between-network connectivity measures. These were derived from 14 large-scale brain networks across the left and right hemispheres, known as the “Yeo 7” networks (Yeo et al., 2011), which include seven networks per hemisphere arranged in various combinations, including self-combinations. The Yeo 7 networks consist of visual (“Vis”), somatomotor (“SomMot”), dorsal attention (“DorsAttn”), salience/ventral attention (“SalVentAttn”), limbic, control (“Cont”), and default mode (“Default”). Lastly, 98 cortical-to-subcortical connectivity measures were evaluated, involving combinations of the 14 hemisphere-specific networks with seven subcortical structures. These subcortical structures include the thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, hippocampus, amygdala, and accumbens. Genome-wide summary statistics can be found at the European Bioinformatics Institute GWAS Catalog (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas) under accession numbers GCST90302648 through GCST90302853.

Two-sample MR analysis

To ensure accurate and reliable outcomes in studying the relationship between SC and sleep duration in children, several quality control steps were undertaken to select the most appropriate IVs. Firstly, to obtain a sufficient number of SNPs for subsequent sensitivity analyses, we set a threshold of p < 1 × 10−6 for SNP selection, following previous MR studies on SC measures. Secondly, any SNPs in linkage disequilibrium were excluded if they had an R2 value greater than 0.001 within a clumping window of 10,000 kb. Thirdly, palindromic SNPs, such as those with A/T or G/C alleles, were excluded to prevent strand ambiguity. Finally, the strength of the IVs was assessed using F statistics; an F statistic greater than 10 suggests that the likelihood of bias from weak instruments is minimal.

We utilized the two-sample MR approach, employing the TwoSampleMR (version 0.5.11) package (Hemani et al., 2017, 2018). Our principal method for MR analysis was the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method. This meta-analytic approach combines Wald estimates from each SNP to compute an overall effect estimate of the exposure on the outcome (Burgess et al., 2013). This method operates under the assumption that all included variants are valid instruments or that any horizontal pleiotropy is balanced, thus not violating the fundamental assumptions of MR.

We supplemented our primary analysis with several auxiliary methods to further assess causality. The MR-Egger method (Bowden et al., 2015) uses weighted linear regression to address potential biases due to directional pleiotropy by analyzing the relationship between the SNP–exposure and SNP–outcome associations. It offers reliable causal estimates even when all genetic variants may be invalid instruments under the InSIDE (Instrument Strength Independent of Direct Effect) assumption, albeit with less efficiency compared with IVW and median-based methods. The weighted median approach (Bowden et al., 2016) integrates data from multiple genetic variants to produce a single causal estimate and provides consistent estimates even if up to 50% of the instruments are invalid. Mode-based methods (Hartwig et al., 2017) classify SNPs into clusters based on similarity in causal effects, estimating the causal effect from the most frequent value (mode). This approach minimizes bias and reduces type I errors, particularly when the SNPs in the largest cluster are valid instruments. To enhance the robustness of our results, we conducted further verification using Bayesian Weighted Mendelian Randomization (BWMR). BWMR is an advanced Mendelian randomization method that utilizes a Bayesian framework to model genetic associations with both the exposure and the outcome (Zuber et al., 2020). This approach integrates prior distributions and accommodates uncertainties in estimates, enabling more robust causal inference particularly when dealing with weak instruments or complex pleiotropic structures. The MR results obtained from the BWMR analysis demonstrate consistency with our initial findings and confirm the robustness of our results.

Sensitivity analysis

To enhance the robustness of our findings, we conducted several sensitivity analyses. Firstly, we evaluated the heterogeneity of SNP effects using Cochran's Q statistic (Bowden et al., 2018), as heterogeneity could bias the IVW estimates. A p value greater than 0.05 for this test suggested minimal heterogeneity impact. Where heterogeneity was detected, we employed the random-effects model of IVW to assess the causal effects more appropriately. Secondly, to address the risk of horizontal pleiotropy, which could violate the exclusion restriction assumption of MR (that IVs should not influence the outcome except through the exposure; Angrist et al., 1996; Didelez and Sheehan, 2007), we analyzed the MR-Egger regression intercept. An intercept not significantly different from zero (p > 0.05) indicated an absence of directional pleiotropy (Burgess and Thompson, 2017). Lastly, we implemented a leave-one-out analysis to ascertain the robustness of the causal effect estimates. This approach involves sequentially removing each IV and recalculating the IVW estimate using the remaining IVs, thus assessing the influence of individual variants on the overall causal estimate. These methods collectively ensure our analysis is both thorough and reliable in detecting true causal relationships.

Data and code accessibility statement

Data and code can be made available on written reasonable request to the corresponding authors.

Results

Selection of IVs

Initially, 206 SC measures and 3,056 SNPs were extracted under a locus-wide significance threshold of p < 5 × 10−6. These 206 SC measures include three hemisphere-level connectivity measures (70 SNPs), 14 within-network connectivity measures (171 SNPs), 91 between-network connectivity measures (1,395 SNPs), and 98 cortical-to-subcortical connectivity measures (1,410 SNPs).

MR results with five statistical methods

We explored the connections between SC measures and sleep duration in children using a two-sample MR approach. Significant associations were identified between sleep duration and the SC of the LH control network to the accumbens, LH dorsal attention network to the thalamus, LH somatomotor network to the LH default network, RH control network to the thalamus, RH default network to the thalamus, RH limbic network to the thalamus, and RH somatomotor network to the thalamus white matter (p < 0.05; Fig. 2).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Circos image of the association of 206 SC measures with sleep duration in children. Moving from the inner circle to the outer circle, five statistical techniques are depicted. Red indicates a p value of <0.05.

Table 2 presents findings from the two-sample MR analysis, showing associations between seven SC measures and sleep duration in children. It was observed that higher densities in the white-matter SC from the LH control network to the accumbens [inverse variance weighted (IVW): β = −0.15; 95% CI = [−0.30, −2.88 × 10−3]; p = 0.05] and the LH somatomotor network to the LH default network (IVW: β = −0.18; 95% CI = [−0.34, −0.03]; p = 0.02) are associated with shorter sleep durations. Conversely, increased densities in the white-matter SC from the LH dorsal attention network to the thalamus (IVW: β = 0.14; 95% CI = [8.45 × 10−4, 0.27]; p = 0.05), the RH control network to the thalamus (IVW: β = 0.10; 95% CI = [0.01, 0.19]; p = 0.03), the RH default network to the thalamus (IVW: β = 0.08; 95% CI = [4.53 × 10−3, 0.16]; p = 0.04), the RH limbic network to the thalamus (IVW: β = 0.15; 95% CI = [0.05, 0.26]; p = 3.77 × 10−3), and the RH somatomotor network to the thalamus (IVW: β = 0.20; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.32]; p = 1.63 × 10−3) correlate with longer sleep durations in children.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Two-sample MR analysis on the association between connectivity measures and sleep duration in children

Results calculated using the IVW method suggest that each standard deviation increase in the white-matter SC from the LH somatomotor network to the LH default network results in a reduction of sleep duration by 0.18 h. Similarly, each standard deviation increase in the white-matter SC from the RH somatomotor network to the thalamus is associated with an increase in sleep duration by 0.20 h in children.

Trend relationships between these seven significant brain structural connections and children's sleep duration are displayed using scatterplots in Figure 3. Each plot utilizes different colors to represent the various MR analysis methods.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Scatterplot illustrating the two-sample MR results for the effects of the SC of LH Cont network to accumbens (A), LH DorsAttn network to thalamus (B), LH SomMot network to LH Default network (C), RH Cont network to thalamus (D), RH Default network to thalamus (E), RH Lim network to thalamus (F), and RH SomMot network to thalamus (G) white-matter on sleep duration in children. The Slop of various colorful lines represent the estimated MR effect derived from different MR methods.

Assessment of assumptions

Cochran's Q test for the IVW findings demonstrated a lack of significant statistical heterogeneity across the independent variables. Additionally, the MR-Egger regression intercepts suggested no significant directional horizontal pleiotropy. The robustness of these findings is further supported by the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis, as shown in Figure 4, confirming that no single IV disproportionately influenced the overall causal assessment.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Leave-one-out plots for causal effects for the SC of LH Cont network to accumbens (A), LH DorsAttn network to thalamus (B), LH SomMot network to LH Default network (C), RH Cont network to thalamus (D), RH Default network to thalamus (E), RH Lim network to thalamus (F), and RH SomMot network to thalamus (G) white-matter on sleep duration in children on sleep duration in children. Each line indicates the effect of an IV.

Discussion

In this study, we identified that out of 206 brain SC indices, seven showed a causal relationship with children's sleep duration. Specifically, enhancements in the white-matter SC from the LH control network to the accumbens and from the LH somatomotor network to the LH default network were associated with reduced sleep duration. Conversely, increases in the white-matter SC involving the LH dorsal attention network to the thalamus, RH control network to the thalamus, RH default network to the thalamus, RH limbic network to the thalamus, and RH somatomotor network to the thalamus were linked to longer sleep durations.

The SC between the LH control network and accumbens is negatively correlated with children's sleep duration. Within this context, the control network refers to the executive control networks (ECNs), which serve as control systems governing task selection and behavioral guidance, utilizing information from various brain networks to inform individual choices (Koechlin, 2007). Furthermore, the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is central to goal-oriented and reward-seeking behaviors (Salgado and Kaplitt, 2015) and is associated with anxiety, depression, and addictive behaviors (Lee et al., 2019). The NAcc may serve as an effective target for specific pathologies related to reward-based or pain-related behaviors that exhibit risky characteristics (Yan et al., 2023). Research indicates that enhanced connectivity between reward areas—such as the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex, right posterior orbitofrontal cortex, and ventral striatum—and the LH ECNs is associated with improved executive functioning (Jenkins et al., 2021).

Enhanced SC between the LH somatomotor network (SMN) and LH default network (DMN) is associated with decreased sleep duration in children. The SMN, also known as the sensorimotor network, comprises the precentral gyrus, which governs motor control, and the postcentral gyrus, which processes somatic sensations. The DMN is characterized by higher activity levels during rest and sleep compared with periods of task engagement (Buckner et al., 2009). Studies in adults have identified enhanced connectivity between the SMN and DMN as a marker of early functional pathologies in Huntington's disease (Sánchez-Castañeda et al., 2017). Research has also shown reduced SC in regions such as the left somatomotor area, ventral and dorsal attention networks (SAN), and DMN among patients with insomnia compared with healthy controls (Rostampour et al., 2023). In children, patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) exhibit lower spontaneous neural activity in the DMN and SMN (Bu et al., 2020). Furthermore, increased connectivity between these networks correlates with more severe hyperactive behaviors. This may help explain why enhanced SMN→DMN connectivity is associated with reduced sleep duration in children.

The SC between the LH dorsal attention network (DAN) and thalamus white matter exhibits a positive correlation with sleep duration in children. The DAN is crucial for maintaining external visuospatial attention, monitoring, and processing visual stimuli within the environment, such as noting specific landmarks or objects during navigation or map reading (Dixon et al., 2017). This network also plays a role in the flow of information from higher-level to lower-level brain areas, facilitating goal-directed behaviors and attentional control (Farrant and Uddin, 2015), enabling individuals to prioritize essential information. The functional connectivity between the thalamus and DAN tends to strengthen with age and is associated with enhanced cognitive abilities, including processing speed, selective attention, and cognitive flexibility (Steiner et al., 2020). However, in children, research has predominantly focused on the functional connectivity between the DMN and DAN. Studies indicate that in children aged 11–13, increased wakefulness after sleep onset is linked with reduced connectivity between the DMN and DAN, particularly in those with shorter sleep duration, with these changes being most pronounced (Hehr et al., 2023). Furthermore, a study of children aged 9–10 revealed that stronger connectivity between the DMN and DAN predicts poorer mental health and sleep outcomes 1 year later (Yang et al., 2022).

The SC between the RH default network and thalamus, RH limbic network and thalamus, and RH somatomotor network and thalamus white matter exhibits a positive correlation with sleep duration in children. The RH default network to thalamus white-matter connectivity is diminished in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (Alderson et al., 2017). Infants born to mothers with prenatal depression demonstrate reduced local clustering and efficiency within the DMN. Furthermore, infant sleep duration positively correlates with overall DMN efficiency (Donnici et al., 2023). Among adolescents, stronger functional connectivity within the DMN during sleep is associated with increased impulsivity under stress, particularly in the context of sleep deprivation (Zhang et al., 2023). The limbic network, responsible for a variety of emotions and long-term memory, projects from the hippocampal region through the fornix to the mammillary bodies and subsequently connects to the thalamus via additional neural pathways (Deasy et al., 2000). Pathological disruptions are observed in the limbic–cortical–striatal–pallidal–thalamic network among patients with severe depression (Zhang et al., 2022). Furthermore, the limbic system network appears to exert a protective effect on sleep, with increased sleep duration associated with enhanced clustering coefficients and local efficiency within the infant limbic system (Donnici et al., 2023). Enhanced SC between the SMN and the thalamus is observed in patients with chronic low back pain and in those with chronic and early-stage psychiatric disorders (Woodward and Heckers, 2016; Zhu et al., 2024). In children, functional connectivity between the ventral region of the thalamus and the facial somatomotor (SMF) network is stronger compared with adults; however, this connectivity begins to diminish starting from the age of 7 (D’Andrea et al., 2023).

Research on the DMN reveals that its maturation during childhood notably involves an increase in connectivity strength and integration, particularly between its anterior and posterior components. These developmental changes in the DMN are crucial for facilitating higher-order cognitive processes and maintaining sleep regulation. Khundrakpam et al. specifically highlight the progressive integration of the DMN with cognitive control networks, which mirrors the development of self-regulation capabilities and sleep maturity during adolescence (Khundrakpam et al., 2016). In our study, alterations in the DMN, particularly the enhanced connectivity from the LH control network to the accumbens, were associated with shorter sleep durations. This finding aligns with the observations of previous studies, which suggest that the maturation of the DMN's connectivity patterns can significantly influence sleep quality and duration in a pediatric population by potentially modulating the neurobiological mechanisms that govern sleep architecture (Cosío-Guirado et al., 2024).

Although the effect sizes reported in this study are relatively small (e.g., β = 0.08 for the RH default network to thalamus), we believe that these findings still provide important insights and practical value for the study of the neurobiological regulation of children's sleep duration. While the influence of individual brain connections is limited, they may have cumulative or interactive effects within the entire brain network. Such network effects could have profound impacts on children's behavioral and cognitive development. However, this also highlights a limitation of the current study, where the practical impact of individual connections is difficult to apply directly in clinical practice. Future research should utilize larger sample sizes and more comprehensive analytical methods to further explore how these structural connections function within broader brain networks and assess their specific impacts on children's health.

Our findings hold significant implications for the prevention of sleep disorders in children and for the application of neurofeedback interventions, by employing the brain structural connectome as a biomarker to assess sleep quality. However, our study is subject to several limitations. Firstly, the GWAS dataset used primarily comprises individuals of European descent, and its applicability to other populations remains to be validated, necessitating further exploratory work. Secondly, although our current MR analysis has identified potential causal relationships between brain network connectivity and children's sleep duration, these results are largely based on statistical inference and require validation through further clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Thirdly, while we have employed SNPs as instrumental variables, we have not explored the specific biological functions of each SNP in detail, which limits our ability to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Future studies should focus on the functional significance of these specific genetic variants and investigate how they influence both brain SC and sleep duration. Despite these limitations, our study is among the first to focus on the quality of sleep in children in relation to brain SC, providing valuable insights for early interventions in pediatric sleep quality.

Conclusion

This two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates a causal relationship between brain structural connectomes and sleep duration in children. Our findings advance the understanding of structural and functional connectivity patterns associated with pediatric sleep, potentially leading to more targeted and effective treatments for improving sleep health in this population.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by Science and Technology Innovation Program of Shanghai (20Z11900603 to J.W.); Dali Prefecture Science and Technology Plan Project (Grant No. 20232901A020010 to L.L.).

  • ↵*R.Z. and L.L. contributed equally to this work.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alderson T,
    2. Kehoe E,
    3. Maguire L,
    4. Farrell D,
    5. Lawlor B,
    6. Kenny R,
    7. Lyons D,
    8. Bokde A,
    9. Coyle D
    (2017) Disrupted thalamus white matter anatomy and posterior default mode network effective connectivity in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci 9:370. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00370 pmid:29167639
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Angrist JD,
    2. Imbens GW,
    3. Rubin DB
    (1996) Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J Am Stat Assoc 91:444–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Astill RG,
    2. Van der Heijden KB,
    3. Van Ijzendoorn MH,
    4. Van Someren EJ
    (2012) Sleep, cognition, and behavioral problems in school-age children: a century of research meta-analyzed. Psychol Bull 138:1109–1138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bowden J,
    2. Davey Smith G,
    3. Burgess S
    (2015) Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 44:512–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv080 pmid:26050253
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bowden J,
    2. Davey Smith G,
    3. Haycock PC,
    4. Burgess S
    (2016) Consistent estimation in Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol 40:304–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21965 pmid:27061298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bowden J,
    2. Del Greco MF,
    3. Minelli C,
    4. Zhao Q,
    5. Lawlor D,
    6. Sheehan N,
    7. Thompson J,
    8. Davey Smith G
    (2018) Improving the accuracy of two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization: moving beyond the NOME assumption.
  7. ↵
    1. Bu X,
    2. Liang K,
    3. Lin Q,
    4. Gao Y,
    5. Qian A,
    6. Chen H,
    7. Chen W,
    8. Wang M,
    9. Yang C,
    10. Huang X
    (2020) Exploring white matter functional networks in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Brain Commun 2:fcaa113. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaa113 pmid:33215081
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Buckner RL,
    2. Sepulcre J,
    3. Talukdar T,
    4. Krienen FM,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Hedden T,
    7. Andrews-Hanna JR,
    8. Sperling RA,
    9. Johnson KA
    (2009) Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 29:1860–1873. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009 pmid:19211893
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Burgess S,
    2. Butterworth A,
    3. Thompson SG
    (2013) Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol 37:658–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.21758 pmid:24114802
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Burgess S,
    2. Thompson SG
    (2017) Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol 32:377–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x pmid:28527048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cosío-Guirado R,
    2. Tapia-Medina MG,
    3. Kaya C,
    4. Peró-Cebollero M,
    5. Villuendas-González ER,
    6. Guàrdia-Olmos J
    (2024) A comprehensive systematic review of fMRI studies on brain connectivity in healthy children and adolescents: current insights and future directions. Dev Cogn Neurosci 69:101438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101438 pmid:39153422
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Dai C,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Cai X,
    4. Peng Z,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Shao Y,
    7. Wang C
    (2020) Effects of sleep deprivation on working memory: change in functional connectivity between the dorsal attention, default mode, and fronto-parietal networks. Front Hum Neurosci 14:360. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00360 pmid:33192381
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. D'Andrea CB, et al.
    (2023) Thalamo-cortical and cerebello-cortical functional connectivity in development. Cereb Cortex 33:9250–9262. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad198 pmid:37293735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Davies NM,
    2. Holmes MV,
    3. Davey Smith G
    (2018) Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ 362:k601. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k601 pmid:30002074
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Deasy NP,
    2. Jarosz JM,
    3. Elwes RC,
    4. Polkey CE,
    5. Cox TC
    (2000) Thalamic changes with mesial temporal sclerosis: MRI. Neuroradiology 42:346–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002340050896
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Didelez V,
    2. Sheehan N
    (2007) Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res 16:309–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280206077743
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Dixon ML,
    2. Andrews-Hanna JR,
    3. Spreng RN,
    4. Irving ZC,
    5. Mills C,
    6. Girn M,
    7. Christoff K
    (2017) Interactions between the default network and dorsal attention network vary across default subsystems, time, and cognitive states. Neuroimage 147:632–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.073
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Donnici C,
    2. Tomfohr-Madsen L,
    3. Long X,
    4. Manning KY,
    5. Giesbrecht G,
    6. Lebel C
    (2023) Prenatal depressive symptoms are associated with altered structural brain networks in infants and moderated by infant sleep. J Affect Disord 339:118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.054 pmid:37390922
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Farrant K,
    2. Uddin LQ
    (2015) Asymmetric development of dorsal and ventral attention networks in the human brain. Dev Cogn Neurosci 12:165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.02.001 pmid:25797238
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Fox MD,
    2. Snyder AZ,
    3. Vincent JL,
    4. Corbetta M,
    5. Van Essen DC,
    6. Raichle ME
    (2005) The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:9673–9678. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504136102 pmid:15976020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gradisar M,
    2. Gardner G,
    3. Dohnt H
    (2011) Recent worldwide sleep patterns and problems during adolescence: a review and meta-analysis of age, region, and sleep. Sleep Med 12:110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2010.11.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gupta V,
    2. Walia GK,
    3. Sachdeva MP
    (2017) ‘Mendelian randomization’: an approach for exploring causal relations in epidemiology. Public Health 145:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.12.033
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Hartwig FP,
    2. Davey Smith G,
    3. Bowden J
    (2017) Robust inference in summary data Mendelian randomization via the zero modal pleiotropy assumption. Int J Epidemiol 46:1985–1998. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyx102 pmid:29040600
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hehr A,
    2. Huntley ED,
    3. Marusak HA
    (2023) Getting a good night's sleep: associations between sleep duration and parent-reported sleep quality on default mode network connectivity in youth. J Adolesc Health 72:933–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.01.010 pmid:36872118
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hemani G, et al.
    (2018) The MR-base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife 7:e34408. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34408 pmid:29846171
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Hemani G,
    2. Tilling K,
    3. Davey Smith G
    (2017) Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet 13:e1007081. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007081 pmid:29149188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Jenkins LM, et al.
    (2021) Blood pressure, executive function, and network connectivity in middle-aged adults at risk of dementia in late life. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 118:e2024265118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024265118 pmid:34493658
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Khundrakpam BS,
    2. Lewis JD,
    3. Zhao L,
    4. Chouinard-Decorte F,
    5. Evans AC
    (2016) Brain connectivity in normally developing children and adolescents. Neuroimage 134:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kocevska D,
    2. Barclay NL,
    3. Bramer WM,
    4. Gehrman PR,
    5. Van Someren EJW
    (2021) Heritability of sleep duration and quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev 59:9250–9262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101448
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Koechlin E
    (2007) Architecture of central executive functions in the human prefrontal cortex.
  31. ↵
    1. Lee DJ,
    2. Lozano CS,
    3. Dallapiazza RF,
    4. Lozano AM
    (2019) Current and future directions of deep brain stimulation for neurological and psychiatric disorders. J Neurosurg 131:333–342. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.4.JNS181761
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Lei Y,
    2. Shao Y,
    3. Wang L,
    4. Zhai T,
    5. Zou F,
    6. Ye E,
    7. Jin X,
    8. Li W,
    9. Qi J,
    10. Yang Z
    (2015) Large-scale brain network coupling predicts total sleep deprivation effects on cognitive capacity. PLoS One 10:e0133959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Marinelli M, et al.
    (2016) Heritability and genome-wide association analyses of sleep duration in children: the EAGLE consortium. Sleep 39:1859–1869. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.6170 pmid:27568811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Markovic A,
    2. Kaess M,
    3. Tarokh L
    (2020) Environmental factors shape sleep EEG connectivity during early adolescence. Cereb Cortex 30:5780–5791. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Paruthi S, et al.
    (2016) Consensus statement of the American academy of sleep medicine on the recommended amount of sleep for healthy children: methodology and discussion. J Clin Sleep Med 12:1549–1561. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6288 pmid:27707447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Rostampour M,
    2. Gharaylou Z,
    3. Rostampour A,
    4. Shahbodaghy F,
    5. Zarei M,
    6. Fadaei R,
    7. Khazaie H
    (2023) Study of structural network connectivity using DTI tractography in insomnia disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 336:111730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2023.111730
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Salgado S,
    2. Kaplitt MG
    (2015) The nucleus accumbens: a comprehensive review. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 93:75–93. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Sánchez-Castañeda C,
    2. de Pasquale F,
    3. Caravasso CF,
    4. Marano M,
    5. Maffi S,
    6. Migliore S,
    7. Sabatini U,
    8. Squitieri F
    (2017) Resting-state connectivity and modulated somatomotor and default-mode networks in Huntington disease. CNS Neurosci Ther 23:488–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12701 pmid:28464463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Steiner L,
    2. Federspiel A,
    3. Slavova N,
    4. Wiest R,
    5. Grunt S,
    6. Steinlin M,
    7. Everts R
    (2020) Functional topography of the thalamo-cortical system during development and its relation to cognition. Neuroimage 223:117361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117361
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Tashjian SM,
    2. Goldenberg D,
    3. Galván A
    (2017) Neural connectivity moderates the association between sleep and impulsivity in adolescents. Dev Cogn Neurosci 27:35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2017.07.006 pmid:28777996
    OpenUrlPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Wainberg M,
    2. Forde NJ,
    3. Mansour S,
    4. Kerrebijn I,
    5. Medland SE,
    6. Hawco C,
    7. Tripathy SJ
    (2024) Genetic architecture of the structural connectome. Nat Commun 15:1962. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46023-2 pmid:38438384
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Woodward ND,
    2. Heckers S
    (2016) Mapping thalamocortical functional connectivity in chronic and early stages of psychotic disorders. Biol Psychiatry 79:1016–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.026 pmid:26248537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Yan H,
    2. Shlobin NA,
    3. Jung Y,
    4. Zhang KK,
    5. Warsi N,
    6. Kulkarni AV,
    7. Ibrahim GM
    (2023) Nucleus accumbens: a systematic review of neural circuitry and clinical studies in healthy and pathological states. J Neurosurg 138:337–346. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.5.JNS212548
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Yang FN,
    2. Liu TT,
    3. Wang Z
    (2022) Functional connectome mediates the association between sleep disturbance and mental health in preadolescence: a longitudinal mediation study. Hum Brain Mapp 43:2041–2050. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25772 pmid:35040524
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Yao S,
    2. Zhang M,
    3. Dong SS,
    4. Wang JH,
    5. Zhang K,
    6. Guo J,
    7. Guo Y,
    8. Yang T-L
    (2022) Bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis identifies causal associations between relative carbohydrate intake and depression. Nat Hum Behav 6:1569–1576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01412-9
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Yeo BT, et al.
    (2011) The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 106:1125–1165. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011 pmid:21653723
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Cui Z,
    3. Huffman LG,
    4. Oshri A
    (2023) Sleep mediates the effect of stressful environments on youth development of impulsivity: the moderating role of within default mode network resting-state functional connectivity. Sleep Health 9:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2023.03.005 pmid:37270396
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Ai H,
    4. Van Dam NT,
    5. Qian L,
    6. Hou G,
    7. Xu P
    (2022) Microstructural deficits of the thalamus in major depressive disorder. Brain Commun 4:fcac236. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcac236 pmid:36196087
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Zhu K, et al.
    (2024) The enhanced connectivity between the frontoparietal, somatomotor network and thalamus as the most significant network changes of chronic low back pain. Neuroimage 290:120558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120558
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Zuber V,
    2. Colijn JM,
    3. Klaver C,
    4. Burgess S
    (2020) Selecting likely causal risk factors from high-throughput experiments using multivariable Mendelian randomization. Nat Commun 11:29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13870-3 pmid:31911605
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Selva Baltan, Oregon Health &Science University Department of Surgery

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Rupesh Chillale.

Successful revision

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (12)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 12
December 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Genetically Supported Causality between Brain Structural Connectome and Sleep Duration in Children: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Genetically Supported Causality between Brain Structural Connectome and Sleep Duration in Children: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
Ruijie Zhang, Liyan Luo, Lu Zhang, Xinao Lin, Chuyan Wu, Feng Jiang, Jimei Wang
eNeuro 4 December 2024, 11 (12) ENEURO.0267-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0267-24.2024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Genetically Supported Causality between Brain Structural Connectome and Sleep Duration in Children: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study
Ruijie Zhang, Liyan Luo, Lu Zhang, Xinao Lin, Chuyan Wu, Feng Jiang, Jimei Wang
eNeuro 4 December 2024, 11 (12) ENEURO.0267-24.2024; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0267-24.2024
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Data Availability
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • brain networks
  • children
  • Mendelian randomization
  • sleep duration
  • structural connectivity

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Aperiodicity in mouse CA1 and DG power spectra
  • Numbers of granule cells and GABAergic boutons are correlated in shrunken sclerotic hippocampi of sea lions with temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Breaching the blood-brain interface: Vasoactive neurons contact capillary vessels of the brain clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus
Show more Research Article: New Research

Neuronal Excitability

  • Galanin Inhibits Histaminergic Neurons via Galanin Receptor 1
  • The Neurexin1β Histidine-Rich Domain Is Involved in Excitatory Presynaptic Organization and Short-Term Plasticity
  • Fast Spiking Interneurons Autonomously Generate Fast Gamma Oscillations in the Medial Entorhinal Cortex with Excitation Strength Tuning ING–PING Transitions
Show more Neuronal Excitability

Subjects

  • Neuronal Excitability
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.