Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Cell-Type Specific Connectivity of Whisker-Related Sensory and Motor Cortical Input to Dorsal Striatum

Branden D. Sanabria, Sindhuja S. Baskar, Alex J. Yonk, Iván Linares-Garcia, Victoria E. Abraira, Christian R. Lee and David J. Margolis
eNeuro 27 December 2023, 11 (1) ENEURO.0503-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0503-23.2023
Branden D. Sanabria
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Branden D. Sanabria
Sindhuja S. Baskar
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sindhuja S. Baskar
Alex J. Yonk
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alex J. Yonk
Iván Linares-Garcia
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Iván Linares-Garcia
Victoria E. Abraira
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Victoria E. Abraira
Christian R. Lee
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christian R. Lee
David J. Margolis
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David J. Margolis
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Viral circuit mapping of M1 and S1 corticostriatal projections to dorsal striatal SPNs and FSIs. A, Viral circuit mapping strategy highlighting spaghetti monster injections into M1 and S1 from a top-down view (left) and the corticostriatal projection pattern onto biocytin-filled striatal cells from a sagittal view (right). B, Top-left: Low magnification view of a coronal striatal section containing the M1 sm.FP injection site and corticostriatal projections to the DLS. CC, corpus callosum; DLS, dorsolateral striatum. Top-right: Low magnification view of a coronal striatal section with S1 corticostriatal projections labeled with sm.FPs. Bottom-left: Low magnification view of merged fluorescence from S1 and M1 corticostriatal projections innervating a striatal SPN filled with biocytin (white box). Bottom-right: High magnification inset bottom-left image with corticostriatal innervation by M1 and S1 onto a biocytin-filled SPN. C, Left: Pseudo-colored representative image of a biocytin-filled SPN with spiny dendrites (inset). Right: Pseudo-colored representative image of a biocytin-filled FSI with aspiny dendrites (inset). D, Left: Average number of primary dendrites (note that FSIs have more primary dendrites extending from the soma compared to SPNs). Right: Average cross-sectional diameter of the soma. E, Comparison of mean IFF and mean HHW at steady state permits differentiation of FSIs from SPNs due to their fast-firing rates. F, Left: Average max firing frequency. Right: Average ISI. G, Schematic representation of the recording location of the SPNs and FSIs in our dataset (note that all cells were recorded in the anterior dorsal striatum where M1 and S1 innervation was dense).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Morphological and electrophysiological properties of SPNs and FSIs. A, Mean cross-sectional diameter of the dendritic field. B, Mean depth of the dendritic field along the z-axis. C, Mean HWH amplitude. D, Mean IFF. E, Mean resting membrane potential voltage. F, Mean input resistance.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    3D reconstructions of striatal neurons and confirmation of S1 and M1 synaptic puncta. A, 3D reconstruction of biocytin-filled SPNs and FSIs into a “surface” and “filament” object in Imaris. B, Representative raw fluorescence from biocytin, the presynaptic protein bassoon, M1, and S1. C, Merged image from B demonstrating S1 and M1 presynaptic inputs dually innervating an SPN (top) and FSI (bottom).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Differential innervation by S1 and M1 to SPNs and FSIs. A, Magnified view of raw fluorescence (left) from S1 and M1 corticostriatal projections onto a biocytin-filled SPN (top) and FSI (bottom) with their associated 3D reconstructions (right). B, Average percent innervation by M1 and S1. C, Mean distribution of S1 and M1 inputs across the neuron when measuring the distance from the soma along the length of a dendrite. D, Representative image of fluorescence from M1 and S1 masked onto a biocytin-filled SPN (left) and FSI (right) that was later used for input analysis.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Distribution properties of S1 and M1 inputs to SPNs and FSIs. A, Z-positions of the first and last appearance of a dendrite, and the soma of reconstructed SPNs (left) and FSIs (right) compared with the Z-positions of their associated S1 and M1 inputs. B, Mean total number of combined S1 and M1 inputs counted within 0.5 µm of the filament-constructed SPN or FSI. C, Mean number of inputs counted from S1 and M1 within 0.5 µm of the filament edge. D, Mean percentage of identified M1 and S1 inputs that colocalized with Vglut1. E, Mean ratio of M1 inputs to S1 inputs counted within 0.5 µm of the filament edge. The ratios were statistically compared to a theoretical value of 1 indicated by a red dashed line. F, Cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the M1/S1 ratios. The red dashed line indicates a value of 1, which infers equal innervation by M1 and S1. Gray line = SPNs, black line = FSIs. G, Comparison of M1/S1 ratio with the ML position of the neuron it was recorded from; gray dots = SPNs (N = 12), black dots = FSIs (n = 6). H, Mean distance of an S1 and M1 input from the soma when measured along the length of the dendrite.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    S1 and M1 inputs are found mostly on the spines of SPNs and dendrites of FSIs. A, Mean percent of total S1 and M1 inputs distributed between the spines, dendrites, and soma for SPNs and FSIs. Since FSIs are aspiny, inputs were segmented between the dendrites and soma. B, Mean percent of total S1 and M1 inputs distributed between the spines, dendrites, and soma for inputs that were found in the proximal regions (0 < 30 µm) of SPNs and FSIs. C, Mean density of S1 and M1 inputs represented as contacts per 10 µm. For SPNs, inputs to spines and dendrites were grouped together.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    S1 and M1 input cluster on SPNs but not in FSIs. A, Representative image of fluorescence from M1 (red) and S1 (green) masked onto the dendrites of an SPN (left) and an FSI (right). B, Mean distance between the nearest input from the same cortical region. C, Mean distribution of the shortest distance to the nearest input from the same cortical region. D, Mean distance between inputs from different cortical regions. E, Mean percent of S1 and M1 Inputs that are colocalized with an increasing distance threshold for SPNs (right) and FSIs (left). The mean percent was tested against a theoretical value of 50% indicated by the red dashed line using a one-sample t test. F, Mean distance from the soma when measured along the length of the dendrite for S1 and M1 inputs that colocalized within 5 µm of each other. G, Distribution of colocalized inputs from F.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Position of recorded striatal neurons from ex vivo slices relative to bregma

    MLAPDV
    SPN, N = 121.782 ± 0.047 mm1.023 ± 0.056 mm−2.237 ± 0.075 mm
    FSI, n = 61.896 ± 0.193 mm0.920 ± 0.134 mm−2.154 ± 0.079 mm
    • The mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and dorsoventral (DV) positions of the recorded neuron within the striatum relative to bregma.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 11 (1)
eNeuro
Vol. 11, Issue 1
January 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cell-Type Specific Connectivity of Whisker-Related Sensory and Motor Cortical Input to Dorsal Striatum
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Cell-Type Specific Connectivity of Whisker-Related Sensory and Motor Cortical Input to Dorsal Striatum
Branden D. Sanabria, Sindhuja S. Baskar, Alex J. Yonk, Iván Linares-Garcia, Victoria E. Abraira, Christian R. Lee, David J. Margolis
eNeuro 27 December 2023, 11 (1) ENEURO.0503-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0503-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Cell-Type Specific Connectivity of Whisker-Related Sensory and Motor Cortical Input to Dorsal Striatum
Branden D. Sanabria, Sindhuja S. Baskar, Alex J. Yonk, Iván Linares-Garcia, Victoria E. Abraira, Christian R. Lee, David J. Margolis
eNeuro 27 December 2023, 11 (1) ENEURO.0503-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0503-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dorsolateral striatum
  • interneurons
  • motor
  • sensory
  • spiny neurons
  • striatum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • sAPPα inhibits neurite outgrowth in primary mouse neurons via GABA B Receptor subunit 1a
  • When Familiar Faces Feel Better: A Framework for Social Neurocognitive Aging in a Rat Model
  • The neurexin1β histidine-rich domain is involved in excitatory presynaptic organization and short-term plasticity
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Independent encoding of orientation and mean luminance by mouse visual cortex
  • Different But Complementary Motor Functions Reveal an Asymmetric Recalibration of Upper Limb Bimanual Coordination
  • Serotonergic Suppression of Sustained Synaptic Responses in Rat Oculomotor Neural Integrator Networks
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.