Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Dopamine Receptor Type 2-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Ventral Lateral Striatum Have a Non-REM Sleep-Induce Function

Tomonobu Kato, Kenji F. Tanaka and Akiyo Natsubori
eNeuro 13 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0327-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0327-23.2023
Tomonobu Kato
1Division of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160–8582, Japan
3Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223–8522, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tomonobu Kato
Kenji F. Tanaka
1Division of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160–8582, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kenji F. Tanaka
Akiyo Natsubori
2Sleep Disorders Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Setagaya-Ku, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Spatiotemporally specific the VS D2-MSNs ablation. a, DOX-controllable DTA expression. Drd2-tTA::tetO-DTA (D2-DTA) mice were fed with doxycycline (DOX)-containing chow until the start of the experiment (DOX-on). DTA mRNA expression started when DOX-chow was replaced with normal chow (DOX-off). b, Time course of the VS D2-MSNs ablation, and timing of the polysomnographic recordings. c, Schematic illustration of the VS, including the VMS and the VLS. d, Drd1, Drd2, and DTA mRNA levels in the striatum on DOX-off day 10. Purple denotes the mRNA signal. Left, Drd1 mRNA expression throughout the striatum. Middle, Drd2 mRNA expression in the VLS disappears (yellow arrow). Right, DTA mRNA expression was observed throughout the VS (yellow arrow).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Analysis of sleep structure before and after the VLS/VS D2-MSNs ablation. a, Experimental setup. We conducted 24 h EEG/EMG recording in a soundproof box and set a 12/12 h light/dark cycle using LED light. b, Total amount of wake, NREM sleep, and REM sleep time in control (DOX-off day −1) and DOX-off days 5, 7, and 10 (n = 5 mice). Repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test (Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 1). c, Time spent in each sleep state during the light and dark phases in control (DOX-off day −1) and DOX-off mice on days 5, 7, and 10 (n = 5 mice). Repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test (Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 2). d, Daily variations in wake time (left), NREM sleep (middle), REM sleep (right) every hour in control (DOX-off day −1), and DOX-off day 10 (n = 5 mice). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test (Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 3). e, Episode numbers of wake, NREM sleep, and REM sleep for 24 h, light, and dark phases in control (DOX-off day −1) and DOX-off days 5, 7, and 10 (n = 5 mice). Repeated-measures ANOVA. Wake (24 h): p = 0.62; wake (light), p = 0.36; wake (dark), p = 0.89; NREM (24 h): p = 0.60; NREM (light), p = 0.33; NREM (dark), p = 0.88; REM (24 h): p = 0.30; REM (light), p = 0.42; REM (dark), p = 0.88. f, Daily variations in number of episodes during each sleep/wake state in control (DOX-off day −1), DOX-off day 10 (n = 5 mice). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 4. g, Mean duration of each bout of wake, NREM sleep, and REM sleep for 24 h, light, and dark phases in control (DOX-off day −1) and DOX-off days 5, 7, and 10 (n = 5 mice). Repeated-measures ANOVA. Wake (24 h): p = 0.21, Wake (light): p = 0.22, Wake (dark): p = 0.04 (no significant difference between each group using the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test), NREM (24 h): p = 0.20, NREM (light): p = 0.29, NREM (dark): p = 0.16, REM (24 h): p = 0.14, REM (light): p = 0.37, REM (dark): p = 0.16. h, Daily variations in mean duration during each sleep-wake state in control (DOX-off day −1) and DOX-off day 10 (n = 5 mice). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 5. Error bars indicate SEM; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Comparison of EEG power spectrum before and after the VS D2-MSNs ablation. EEG spectra before (DOX-off day −1) and after (DOX-off day 10) the VS D2-MSNs ablation during each sleep-wake state (n = 5 mice). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was followed by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). Results of statistical tests is shown in Table 6. Colored shades indicate SEM; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Population Ca2+ signals of the VLS D2-MSNs across the sleep-wake states. a, Schematic illustration of the fiber photometry system for monitoring intracellular Ca2+ signals of VLS D2-MSNs in D2-YC mice. The EEG and EMG were recorded simultaneously. PMT, photomultiplier tube. b, YCnano50 fluorescent expression in D2-YC mice (left) and a schematic of the fiber photometric recording site (right) in the VLS. The asterisks indicate the tip of the optical fiber. Scale bar, 1 mm. c, Representative examples of EEG signal trace and power spectrogram, EMG signal, and population Ca2+ signal trace and spectrogram of VLS D2-MSNs across the sleep-wake states during the light (upper panel) and dark (lower panel) phases. The green line shows wakefulness, the blue line shows NREM sleep and the red line shows REM sleep. d, Peak frequency of Ca2+ signals in VLS D2-MSNs during each sleep-wake state during the light (left)/dark (right) phases (28 recordings from 7 mice and 11 recordings from 5 mice, respectively; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, wake vs NREM, p = 0.13 and p = 0.37, respectively; NREM vs REM, p = 0.47 and p = 0.72, respectively; wake vs REM, p = 0.67 and p = 0.82, respectively). e, Correlation coefficient between the Ca2+ signals and each frequency band (δ, θ, σ, β, and γ) of EEG power or EMG power during wake and NREM sleep, each frequency band (δ, θ, σ, β, and γ) of EEG power during REM sleep during light (left)/dark (right) phases. f, Cross-correlation between EMG power and Ca2+ signals during wake, between EEG γ power and Ca2+ signals during wake, between EEG β and γ power and Ca2+ signals during NREM sleep, and between EEG γ power and Ca2+ signals during REM sleep during light (left)/dark (right) phases. g, Mean Ca2+ signal levels of the VLS D2-MSNs across the sleep-wake states during light (left)/(right) phases (28 recordings from 7 mice and 11 recordings from 5 mice, respectively; one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, wake vs NREM, p = 1.7 × 10−3 and p = 0.08, respectively; NREM vs REM, p = 0.80 and p = 1.2 × 10−5, respectively; wake vs REM, p = 7.0 × 10−3 and p = 4.1 × 10−4, respectively). h, The Ca2+ signal of the VLS D2-MSNs aligned with each sleep/wake transition during light (left)/dark (right) phases. Upper panel, Ca2+ signal fluctuations during individual transitions with color-coded fluorescence intensity (NREM to wake, n = 386 and 183; wake to NREM, n = 450 and 188; NREM to REM, n = 93 and 7; REM to wake, n = 53 events and 7 from 7 and 5 mice, respectively). Middle panel, Average Ca2+ signals from all transitions. Lower panel, Mean of Ca2+ signal levels before and after 20 s from each stage transition (VLS: pNREM-wake = 3.7 × 10−3 and p = 0.10, respectively, pwake-NREM = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively, pNREM-REM = 0.33 and p = 0.96, respectively, pREM-wake = 0.02 and p = 3.3 × 10−3, respectively; paired t test). Gray shading and error bars indicate SEM; *p < 0.05. W, wake; N, NREM sleep; R, REM sleep.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Sleep-wake state change by optogenetic activation of the VLS D2-MSNs. a, Schematic illustration of optogenetic activation of VLS D2-MSNs in Drd2-ChR2(C128S) mice (hereafter referred to as D2-ChR2 mice). Scale bar, 1 mm. The blue and yellow shades indicate the illumination times. b, Representative examples of EEG signal traces, power spectrograms, and EMG signals under the photostimulation of VLS D2-MSNs during the wake state in D2-ChR2 mice. Vertical blue and yellow shades indicate illumination times. The upper panel shows the optogenetic manipulation and the lower panel shows the control experiment. c, NREM sleep induction rate which indicates whether NREM sleep occurred within 100 s after light illumination. Upper column shows a light phase and lower column shows a dark phase. In each column, left side shows the activation group (blue light illumination) and right side shows control group [yellow light illumination; n = 4 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 49 trials for activation (light phase), 51 trials for control (light phase), a total of 38 trials for activation (dark phase), 39 trials for control (dark phase)]. d, Representative examples of EEG signal trace, power spectrogram, and EMG signal under the photostimulation of VLS D2-MSNs during the NREM sleep in D2-ChR2 mouse. Vertical blue shade indicates illumination times. e, NREM sleep latency after the initiation of optogenetic activation of VLS D2-MSNs during the wake state. The columns on the left and right show the light and dark phases, respectively. In each column, left bar shows the activation group, right bar shows the control group [n = 4 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 49 trials for activation (light phase), 51 trials for control (light phase), a total of 38 trials for activation (dark phase), 39 trials for control (dark phase); plight = 6.9 × 10−5, pdark = 1.5 × 10−3, independent t test]. f, Percentage of NREM sleep time for 100 s after the initiation of VLS D2-MSNs photoactivation during the wake state. The columns on the left and right show the light and dark phases, respectively. In each column, left bar shows the activation group, light bar shows the control group [n = 4 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 49 trials for activation (light phase), 51 trials for control (light phase), a total of 38 trials for activation (dark phase), 39 trials for control (dark phase); plight = 1.2 × 10−4, pdark = 2.4 × 10−4, independent t test]. g, EEG spectrum of D2-ChR2 mice during natural NREM sleep (blue line; we extracted and averaged 200 s of NREM sleep before optogenetic activation) and optogenetically induced sleep (black line) during the light (left panel) and dark phases (right panel; n = 4 mice, the same mice in c–e; δ: plight = 0.63, pdark = 0.94; θ: plight = 0.59, pdark = 0.75, independent t test). Colored shades and error bars indicate SEM; *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Sleep-wake state change by optogenetic activation of the VLS D1-MSNs. a, Schematic illustration of optogenetic activation of VLS D1-MSNs in Pde10a2-tTA::tetO- ChR2(C128S)-EYFP; Adora2a-Cre triple-transgenic mice. Scale bar, 1 mm. The blue and yellow shades indicate the illumination times. b, Representative examples of EEG signal trace, EEG power spectrogram, and EMG signal before and after optogenetic manipulation during the wake. Vertical blue shade indicates illumination times. c, Representative examples of EEG signal traces, EEG power spectrograms, and EMG signals before and after optogenetic manipulation during NREM sleep. Vertical blue and yellow shades indicate illumination times. The upper panel shows the optogenetic manipulation and the lower panel shows the control experiment. d, Wake state induction rate which indicates whether the wake state occurred within 100 s after light illumination. Upper column shows light phase and lower column shows dark phase. In each column, left side shows the activation group (blue light illumination) and right side shows the control group [yellow light illumination; n = 3 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 23 trials for activation (light phase), 18 trials for control (light phase), a total of 18 trials for activation (dark phase), 20 trials for control (dark phase)]. e, Wake latency after the initiation of optogenetic activation of VLS D1-MSNs during NREM sleep. The columns on the left and right show the light and dark phases, respectively. In each column, left bar shows the activation group, right bar shows the control group [n = 3 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 23 trials for activation (light phase), 18 trials for control (light phase), a total of 23 trials for activation (dark phase), 30 trials for control (dark phase); plight = 0.01, pdark = 0.03. independent t test]. f, Percentage of wake time for 100 s after the initiation of VLS D1-MSNs photoactivation. The columns on the left and right show the light and dark phases, respectively. In each column, left bar shows the activation group, light bar shows the control group [n = 3 mice, 5–10 manipulations/recordings, a total of 23 trials for activation (light phase), 18 trials for control (light phase), a total of 23 trials for activation (dark phase), 30 trials for control (dark phase); plight = 6.3 × 10−6, pdark = 2.4 × 10−5, independent t test]. Error bars indicate SEM; *p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for daily amount of sleep/wake times among DOX-off days for the data in Figure 2b

    Total wake timeTotal NREMS timeTotal REMS time
    Comparisonp valuep valuep value
    DOX-off day −1 vsDay 50.170.330.86
    Day 70.290.830.14
    Day 100.006*0.03*0.16
    DOX-off day 5 vsDay −1---
    Day 70.990.470.14
    Day 100.008*0.03*0.20
    DOX-off day 7 vsDay −1---
    Day 5---
    Day 100.008*0.007*0.60
    • ↵* p < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for daily percentage of sleep/wake times in light/dark phases among DOX-off days for the data in Figure 2c

    Light phaseDark phase
    Total wake percentageTotal NREMS percentageTotal REMS percentageTotal wake percentageTotal NREMS percentageTotal REMS percentage
    Comparisonp valuep valuep valuep valuep valuep value
    DOX-off day −1 vsDay 50.710.770.920.005*0.130.03*
    Day 70.9910.770.140.530.008*
    Day 100.9810.940.001*0.006*0.007*
    DOX-off day 5 vsDay −1------
    Day 70.780.370.180.710.12
    Day 100.920.610.690.0004*0.003*0.047*
    DOX-off day 7 vsDay −1------
    Day 5------
    Day 10110.980.0005*0.0004*0.01*
    • ↵* p < 0.05.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for daily variations of sleep/wake times between before and after the DOX-off for the data in Figure 2d

    DOX-off day −1 vs day 10
    p value
    Time of dayWakeNREMSREMS
    ZT10.810.670.71
    ZT20.680.550.47
    ZT30.210.220.99
    ZT40.250.180.94
    ZT50.220.330.29
    ZT60.310.270.19
    ZT70.570.660.71
    ZT80.840.610.27
    ZT90.330.230.75
    ZT100.100.220.41
    ZT110.630.930.30
    ZT120.160.290.12
    ZT130.001*0.004*0.003*
    ZT140.290.330.28
    ZT150.002*0.003*0.01*
    ZT160.02*0.04*0.008*
    ZT170.03*0.02*0.31
    ZT180.290.380.17
    ZT190.005*0.070.04*
    ZT200.910.930.60
    ZT210.350.360.32
    ZT220.003*0.006*0.40
    ZT230.01*0.04*0.70
    ZT240.080.080.15
    • ↵* p < 0.05. ZT: zeitgeber time.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for daily variations of sleep/wake episode numbers between before and after the DOX-off for the data in Figure 2f

    DOX-off day −1 vs day 10
    p value
    Time of dayWakeNREMSREMS
    ZT10.740.700.48
    ZT20.530.480.11
    ZT30.250.300.07
    ZT40.480.570.51
    ZT50.840.640.88
    ZT60.180.371
    ZT70.920.920.66
    ZT80.740.730.73
    ZT90.04*0.03*0.12
    ZT100.410.391
    ZT110.120.130.88
    ZT120.320.290.80
    ZT130.510.460.04*
    ZT140.510.550.34
    ZT150.770.780.05
    ZT160.490.440.06
    ZT170.720.700.60
    ZT180.9510.32
    ZT190.300.480.39
    ZT200.520.620.30
    ZT210.550.500.38
    ZT220.890.810.57
    ZT230.840.840.82
    ZT240.610.640.52
    • ↵* p < 0.05. ZT: zeitgeber time.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for daily variations of mean durations of sleep-wake states between before and after the DOX-off for the data in Figure 2h

    DOX-off day −1 vs day 10
    p value
    Time of dayWakeNREMSREMS
    ZT10.550.750.44
    ZT20.550.540.91
    ZT30.220.290.18
    ZT40.850.160.70
    ZT50.190.670.72
    ZT60.590.170.55
    ZT70.630.700.95
    ZT80.600.860.30
    ZT90.070.180.19
    ZT100.760.180.14
    ZT110.130.180.34
    ZT120.760.160.06
    ZT130.130.02*0.004*
    ZT140.980.170.19
    ZT150.100.150.02*
    ZT160.110.830.14
    ZT170.290.070.31
    ZT180.840.640.68
    ZT190.240.500.03*
    ZT200.690.840.43
    ZT210.270.950.51
    ZT220.180.330.69
    ZT230.620.510.27
    ZT240.310.630.52
    • ↵* p < 0.05. ZT: zeitgeber time.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Results of Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for each EEG band power between before and after the DOX-off for the data in Figure 3

    WakeNREMSREMS
    DOX-off day −1 vs day 10DOX-off day −1 vs day 10DOX-off day −1 vs day 10
    p valuep valuep value
    EEG band power24 hLightDark24 hLightDark24 hLightDark
    Δ0.300.750.320.140.200.160.960.510.48
    θ0.120.420.360.160.290.080.980.980.98
    σ0.800.150.800.100.110.710.270.260.34
    β0.420.350.430.150.160.130.120.080.39
    γ0.990.700.830.850.880.540.330.330.36
    • * p < 0.05.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (9)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 9
September 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dopamine Receptor Type 2-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Ventral Lateral Striatum Have a Non-REM Sleep-Induce Function
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Dopamine Receptor Type 2-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Ventral Lateral Striatum Have a Non-REM Sleep-Induce Function
Tomonobu Kato, Kenji F. Tanaka, Akiyo Natsubori
eNeuro 13 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0327-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0327-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Dopamine Receptor Type 2-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Ventral Lateral Striatum Have a Non-REM Sleep-Induce Function
Tomonobu Kato, Kenji F. Tanaka, Akiyo Natsubori
eNeuro 13 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0327-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0327-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dopamine
  • optogenetics
  • photometry
  • population activity
  • sleep
  • ventral striatum

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Deletion of endocannabinoid synthesizing enzyme DAGLα in Pcp2-positive cerebellar Purkinje cells decreases depolarization-induced short-term synaptic plasticity, reduces social preference, and heightens anxiety
  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Visual Stimulation Under 4 Hz, Not at 10 Hz, Generates the Highest-Amplitude Frequency-Tagged Responses of the Human Brain: Understanding the Effect of Stimulation Frequency
  • Transformed visual working memory representations in human occipitotemporal and posterior parietal cortices
  • Neural Speech-Tracking During Selective Attention: A Spatially Realistic Audiovisual Study
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.