Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Novel Tools and Methods

The Impact of Chemical Fixation on the Microanatomy of Mouse Organotypic Hippocampal Slices

Agata Idziak, V. V. G. Krishna Inavalli, Stéphane Bancelin, Misa Arizono and U. Valentin Nägerl
eNeuro 14 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0104-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0104-23.2023
Agata Idziak
1Unité Mixte de Recherche 5297, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. V. G. Krishna Inavalli
1Unité Mixte de Recherche 5297, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane Bancelin
1Unité Mixte de Recherche 5297, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Misa Arizono
1Unité Mixte de Recherche 5297, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
2Department of Pharmacology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
U. Valentin Nägerl
1Unité Mixte de Recherche 5297, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux F-33000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Brief PFA incubation does not affect ECS volume fraction. A, Graphical overview of the workflow of experiments and analysis. B, Time-lapse shadow imaging of ECS in live and buffered PFA conditions. The live condition is represented both with a raw and inverted LUT. C, ECS volume fraction α does not change during a 30-min incubation with PFA. The images were analyzed either as a whole (“global”) or divided into “neuropil” or “cell bodies” areas (n = 6; presented as mean + SD). D, Representative images of ECS live and after 30 min of incubation with PFA. Blue squares indicate the magnified area that is shown below with an inverted LUT. E, Paired analysis of ECS volume fraction live and after 30 min of incubation with PFA (n = 5; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; in paired t-test). Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Prolonged PFA incubation introduces artifacts into ECS structure. A, Representative images of ECS live and after 90 min of incubation with PFA. The inset and white arrow indicate “cell blebbing.” B, Left, Paired analysis of ECS volume fraction between live and 90 min after PFA fixation. The images were analyzed either as a whole (“global”) or divided into “neuropil” or “cell bodies” areas (ncntrl = 6; nPFA = 6; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; in Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). Right, Comparison of the “cell blebbing” between live and 90-min PFA conditions (n = 6; *p < 0.05; Mann–Whitney test). C, Representative STED images of ECS live and after 90 min of PFA fixation. D, SUSHI-based analysis of ECS widths. The blue lines indicate an example of the analyzed width. The line profiles are shown together with measured FWHMs. E, Paired analysis of ECS widths live and 90 min after PFA fixation (ncntrl = 12; nPFA = 16; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; paired t test). F, Representative images of ECS live and 180 min after PFA fixation. Inset and white arrows indicate examples of dye accumulation around cell bodies. G, A representative confocal shadow image after fixation overnight with PFA. Scale bars (A, F, G): 10 μm; (C, D): 5 μm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    PFA fixation has no detectable effects on astrocytic fine structure. A, Representative confocal images of a brain slice expressing GFAP-Clover in astrocytes, live and 90 min after PFA fixation. White arrows indicate a representative astrocytic main branch and cell body. B, Paired analysis of astrocytic areas of main branches and cell bodies live and 90 min after PFA fixation (nbranches = 12; nbodies = 11; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; paired t test). C, Representative STED images of astrocytic structures in spongiform domain expressing GFAP-Clover, live and 90 min after PFA fixation. The blue lines show representative line profiles of astrocytic structures to determine their width. The line profiles are shown on the right together with calculated FWHMs. D, Paired analysis of widths of astrocytic fine processes, live and 90 min after PFA fixation (ncntrl = 26; nPFA = 28; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; paired t test). Scale bars: 10 μm.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    PFA fixation affects spine morphology. A, Representative STED maximum intensity z-projections of a dendritic segment cytosolically filled with Citrine, live and 90 min after PFA fixation. White arrow indicates a “dendritic vacuole.” B, Bar graph showing appearance of “dendritic vacuoles” after 90 min under live or fixed conditions (expressed as appearances over total number of experiments: control: 2 out of 23; PFA: 15 out of 31; p = 0.0024; bars show mean + SD; Mann–Whitney test). C, Representative STED images of dendritic spines and an example of head and neck analysis using SpineJ. D, Paired analysis of spine head area and neck length (ncntrl = 79; nPFA = 86; ns: not significant; p > 0.05; *p = 0.0157; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). E, An example of a dendritic spine with a wider neck after 90 min of PFA fixation. F, Paired analysis of spine neck width (smallest and median values) between live and 90-min PFA-fixed conditions (ncntrl = 79; nPFA = 86; ns: not significant; ****p < 0.0001; Wilcoxon matched-pairs test). Scale bars (A): 10 μm; (C, E): 500 nm.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    PFA fixation-induced effects on brain tissue microstructure

    Time of fixation
    Structure
    30 min90 min>90 min
    Extracellular spaceNo change in VFNo change in VF
    No change in width
    NE
    (dye uptake)
    Global tissueNo visible changesCell blebbingMembrane permeabilization
    AstrocytesNENo changes in areas of cell bodies and main branches
    No changes in widths of fine processes
    NE
    Dendrites
    Dendritic spines
    NE“Dendritic vacuoles”
    No changes in spine neck length
    Decreased spine head area
    Increased spine neck width
    NE
    • Summary of observed changes in various tissue structures (ECS, astrocytes and dendrites) for different fixation times. VF: volume fraction; NE: not examined.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (9)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 9
September 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Impact of Chemical Fixation on the Microanatomy of Mouse Organotypic Hippocampal Slices
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Impact of Chemical Fixation on the Microanatomy of Mouse Organotypic Hippocampal Slices
Agata Idziak, V. V. G. Krishna Inavalli, Stéphane Bancelin, Misa Arizono, U. Valentin Nägerl
eNeuro 14 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0104-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0104-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The Impact of Chemical Fixation on the Microanatomy of Mouse Organotypic Hippocampal Slices
Agata Idziak, V. V. G. Krishna Inavalli, Stéphane Bancelin, Misa Arizono, U. Valentin Nägerl
eNeuro 14 September 2023, 10 (9) ENEURO.0104-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0104-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • dendrites
  • extracellular space
  • micro anatomy
  • mouse brain tissue
  • PFA fixation artefacts
  • STED microscopy

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Two-dimensional perisaccadic visual mislocalization in rhesus macaque monkeys
  • Early Development of Hypothalamic Neurons Expressing Proopiomelanocortin Peptides, Neuropeptide Y and Kisspeptin in Fetal Rhesus Macaques
  • Experience-dependent neuroplasticity in the hippocampus of bilingual young adults
Show more Research Article: New Research

Novel Tools and Methods

  • AxoDen: An Algorithm for the Automated Quantification of Axonal Density in Defined Brain Regions
  • A preprocessing toolbox for 2-photon subcellular calcium imaging
  • Motor Assisted Commutator to Harness Electronics in Tethered Experiments
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.