Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Reorganization of Corticospinal Projections after Prominent Recovery of Finger Dexterity from Partial Spinal Cord Injury in Macaque Monkeys

Masahiro Sawada, Kimika Yoshino-Saito, Taihei Ninomiya, Takao Oishi, Toshihide Yamashita, Hirotaka Onoe, Masahiko Takada, Yukio Nishimura and Tadashi Isa
eNeuro 19 July 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0209-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0209-23.2023
Masahiro Sawada
1Department of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
2Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Masahiro Sawada
Kimika Yoshino-Saito
1Department of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taihei Ninomiya
3Systems Neuroscience, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama 484-8506, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Takao Oishi
3Systems Neuroscience, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama 484-8506, Japan
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshihide Yamashita
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Toshihide Yamashita
Hirotaka Onoe
6Human Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiko Takada
3Systems Neuroscience, Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Inuyama 484-8506, Japan
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yukio Nishimura
1Department of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
7Neural Prosthetics Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo 156-8506, Japan
8The graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Hayama 240-0193, Japan
9Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yukio Nishimura
Tadashi Isa
1Department of Developmental Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan
4Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
6Human Brain Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan
8The graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Hayama 240-0193, Japan
10Department of Neuroscience, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
11Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Biology (WPI-ASHBi), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tadashi Isa
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Recovery course of precision grip and spinal cord lesion. A, Reach and grasping task (left). Representative image of Precision grip (right). B, Recovery time course of the success rate of precision grip in seven monkeys. Each plot represents the mean success rate. Error bars indicate SEM; n means the number of monkeys on each day. A successful trial was defined as that in which the monkey succeeded in grasping the food morsel with precision grip using just the pads of the index finger and thumb and bringing it to the mouth to eat without dropping it. Data from the last behavioral test before the SCI (day −1 or day 0) are plotted on day 0. C, The extent of spinal cord injury in each animal. The black shaded area indicates the maximum lesion extent of the spinal cord at the border of C4 and C5. The lesion extents of Monkeys Al and Gr were reconstructed from parasagittal sections of their spinal cord. The percentage value beside each panel shows the relative extent of spinal cord injury in each animal (see Materials and Methods). L: left, R: right.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Injection sites of BDA and distribution of the BDA-labeled axons at different segments from C2 to Th1. A, Left, Example of injection sites in M1; bulk of BDA-reaction product at the injection site in the gray matter of the rostral bank of the central sulcus (CS). Center, A high-magnification view of BDA-labeled pyramidal neurons in Layer V at the injection site in Mo Fu. Scale bars in left and center panel indicate 2 mm and 50 μm, respectively. Right, Schematic distribution of injection tracks of BDA (green area). Detailed location of injection sites is shown in Table 1. Arc, arcuate sulcus; Arsp, arcuate sulcus spur. B, Definition of the laminae of Rexed in the C3 and C8 spinal segments (Rexed, 1952). Scale bars = 1 mm. C, Distribution of BDA-labeled axons in the C2, C3, C4, C7, C8, and Th1 spinal segments originating from the right M1 in the intact monkey [Mo-4 from Yoshino-Saito et al., 2010; C(i)], and from the contralesional (right) M1 in Monkey To [C(ii)] and from the ipsilesional (left) M1 in Monkey Fu [C(iii)]. The black shaded area in the panels of C4 in C(ii) and C(iii) indicates the lesion extent at the border of C4 and C5 in these animals Scale bar = 1 mm.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    A, CST axons descending from the contralesional M1 in Monkey To at the C8 segment [compare Fig. 2C(ii)]. Photomicrograph in the left and camera lucida tracing of the BDA-labeled axons (in magenta) in the right panel. D, dorsal; V, ventral; L, left; R, right. Scale bar = 200 μm. B, CST axons descending from the ipsilesional M1 in Monkey Fu at C8 segment [compare Fig. 2C(iii)]. Photomicrograph in the left and camera lucida tracing of the BDA-labeled axons (in green) in the right panel. Scale bar = 200 μm. Note that the CST axons in A are mostly short and penetrate the section perpendicularly, while those in B are traversing the section horizontally for a long distance.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Collateral branching from CST axons originating from the contralesional M1 (coM1) or ipsilesional M1 (ipM1) at the C3 (A–I) and C8 segment (J, K). A, An example trace of CST axons in an axial section showing transverse CST axons entering the gray matter from the ipsilesional dorsolateral funiculus (DLF) at C3 in a monkey with BDA injection into the coM1 [Monkey To, the same as Fig.2C(ii), C3]. R, right; L, left. Scale bar = 1 mm. B, A high magnification view of the square in A. The dashed line indicates the border between the gray matter and white matter (DLF). D, dorsal; L, left. Scale bar = 50 μm. C, Bar graphs indicate the percentage of transverse axons among the labeled axons in ipsilesional DLF at C3. Data were obtained by averaging the number from three axial sections from each monkey. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Intact monkeys (Mo-1, Mo-2, Mo-3, Mo-4); lesioned monkeys (Monkeys To and Di). D, An example trace of longitudinal section of the C3 segment showing transverse axons (black arrow) entering the gray matter from the ipsilesional DLF at C3 in a monkey with BDA injection into the coM1 (Monkey Gr). Descending axons are indicated with black arrowheads. A dashed line indicates the border between gray matter and white matter. R, rostral; L, left. Scale bar = 1 mm. E, High-magnification view of the square in D. The dashed line indicates the border between gray matter and white matter. R, rostral; L, left. Scale bar = 100 μm. F, Percentage of transverse axons among the labeled axons in contralesional DLF at C3 in monkeys with BDA injection into the coM1 (Monkeys Al and Gr). G, An example trace of CST axons in an axial section showing transverse CST axons entering the gray matter from the contralesional DLF at C3 in the monkey with BDA injection into the ipM1 [Monkey Fu, the same as Fig.2C(iii), C3]. Scale bar = 1 mm. H, High magnification of the square in G. D, dorsal; R, right. Scale bar = 100 μm. I, The percentage of transverse axons out of the total number of labeled axons in the contralesional DLF at C3. Data were obtained from the axial sections of Monkeys Fu, As, and De. J, An example trace of CST axons in an axial section showing transverse CST axons entering the gray matter from the contralesional DLF at C8 in a monkey with BDA injection into the ipsilesional M1 [Monkey Fu, the same as Fig.2C(iii), C8]. Scale bar = 1 mm. K, Percentage of transverse axons among the labeled axons in contralesional DLF at C8 in monkeys with BDA injection into the ipM1 (Monkeys De, As, and Fu).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Longitudinal sections of the cervical spinal cord showing CST axons from the contralesional M1 (coM1) that descended in the ipsilesional gray matter. A, Upper panel, The slice obtained at 6.75 mm dorsal from the ventral end of the spinal cord sections (dashed line). Lower panel, A photomicrograph of a longitudinal section spanning C3–C6 segments showing the BDA-labeled CST axons. Horizontal arrows at C4–C5 indicate the levels of rostral and caudal borders of the C4/C5 lesion. The black square corresponds to the area of B. The dashed line indicates the rostral and caudal ends of C. The black line indicates the direction of the central canal, which corresponds to the R-C axis in C. Scale bar = 500 μm. B, A high magnification view of the square in A. Arrowheads show a BDA-labeled CST axon that ran horizontally and entered the gray matter from the DLF. Scale bar = 100 μm. C, Traced axons in the gray matter at the C5 segment of a lesioned monkey [(i); Monkey Gr] and intact monkey [(ii); Mo-5]. Scale bars = 500 μm. D, Direction (see the inset) and length of individual axons in C(i) and C(ii) are indicated with the distribution of vectors in the left and right panels, respectively. Scale bar = 50 μm. E, Relationship between length of each axon piece and its direction shown in D in three sections from Monkey Gr (i) and Mo5 (ii; different color assignment), respectively. F, Density map of the axon pieces with different length (horizontal axis) and different direction (vertical axis). Data obtained from E. The values were normalized by the overall number of the labeled axons in each condition. Encased bins indicate the baseline for the normalization in each panel. G, Photomicrograph of the C6 segment. Magnified view of the square is indicated in H, where the axons are terminated on a large, presumptive motoneuron. The black arrowhead indicates a presumptive bouton-like swelling terminating on the motoneuron. R, rostral; C, caudal; L, lateral; M, medial; DLF, dorsolateral funiculus; GM, gray matter; DF, dorsal funiculus. Scale bars in G and H indicate 500 and 20 μm, respectively.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Comparison of the number of CST axons and boutons originating from the contralesional M1 between the intact (white columns) and lesioned (magenta columns) animals. A, Histograms indicate the number of axons in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C3 (ii), divided by the total number of the axons in the DLF on both sides at C3. Insets in each panel indicate the p-value of t test. B, The number of bouton-like swellings in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C3 (ii). C, The number of axons in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C8 (ii). D, The number of bouton-like swellings in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C8 (ii). *p < 0.05/7. Red letters in the insets indicate statistically significant values. Three sections are obtained from each monkey. The number of intact and lesioned monkey are four and two, respectively.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Comparison of the number of CST axons and boutons originating from the ipsilesional M1 between the intact (white columns) and lesioned (green columns) animals. A, Histograms indicate the number of axons in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C3 (ii), divided by the total number of the axons in the DLF on both sides at C3. Insets in each panel indicate the p-value of t test. B, The number of bouton-like swellings in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C3 (ii). C, The number of axons in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C8 (ii). D, The number of bouton-like swellings in each lamina of the ipsilesional (i) and contralesional C8 (ii). *p < 0.05/7. Red letters in the insets indicate statistically significant values. Three sections are obtained from each monkey.

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    Schematic diagrams of the corticospinal projections originating from the forelimb area of M1 to individual spinal lamina of the C3–C4 and C6-Th1 segments in intact animals (A) and monkeys with the DLF lesion at C4/C5 (B). The increase and decrease of axons and boutons in Laminae I–V are not reflected in this schema because motor control is mainly related to Laminae VI–IX. The decrease of axons and boutons caudal to lesion from contralesional M1 are not reflected in this schema. They are compared with the observation of the hemisection models by Galea and Darian-Smith (1997) and Rosenzweig et al. (2010) which showed poorer recovery (C). The magenta and green indicates the projections from M1 for left-hand and right-hand control, respectively. A, A schematic diagram of the projections of the CST projections from the bilateral M1 to the C3 and C8 segments summarized from our previous study (Yoshino-Saito et al., 2010). B, C, The same arrangement as A. Black lines and circles indicate the increased axons and boutons, respectively. Dotted black lines and gray circles indicate decreased axons and boutons, respectively. Uncrossed CST axons are intentionally removed from the figures because their contribution to the hand movement control has not been clearly demonstrated so far.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Experimental time course and injection sites of BDA in each monkey whose data were used in this manuscript

    NameInjected sideSide to lesionDays to injectionSurvival time after injection (d)Total survival time (d)N of tracksN of injection sitesInjectionInjected amount (μl/site)
    DiRightContra155752306151.5, 3.00.5
    4.5
    ToRightContra5631146778201.5, 3.00.5
    4.5
    AlRightContra278933717181.5, 3.00.5
    4.5
    GrRightContra2771784556121.5, 3.00.5
    4.5
    DeLeftIpsi10742149483.5, 5.00.5
    AsLeftIpsi12430154483.5, 5.00.5
    FuLeftIpsi7311398707182.0, 5.00.5
    8
    Mo1Right1045152.0, 4.0
    6
    Mo2Right1035152.0, 4.0
    6
    Mo3Right804122.0, 4.0
    6
    Mo4Right927212.0, 4.0
    6
    Mo5Right945152.0, 4.0
    6
    • A 0.5-μl solution of biotinylated dextran amine [BDA; Molecular Probes, 10,000 MW, 10% dissolved in 0.01% phosphate buffer (pH 7.3)] was injected using a 10-μl Hamilton microsyringe. d: day.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Mean ± SD of the number of labeled axons in the coronal slices in each component of the white matter at C3 and C8 in individual monkeys with coronal sections

    NameInjected sideSegmentDLF rightLeft
    DiRightC31.7 ± 2.0339.3 ± 22.7
    C80.3 ± 0.52.0 ± 2.6
    ToRightC394.3 ± 2.31169.0 ± 54.2
    C841.3 ± 8.315.7 ± 4.5
    DeLeftC3280.7 ± 17.824.3 ± 2.9
    C8290.0 ± 6.20
    AsLeftC3341.7 ± 9.143.3 ± 4.0
    C8412.3 ± 11.72.0 ± 3.5
    FuLeftC3470.7 ± 54.233.0 ± 8.0
    C8234.7 ± 43.60
    Mo1RightC33.3 ± 18.9335.5 ± 18.9
    C82.0 ± 1.0414.0 ± 6.6
    Mo2RightC322.0 ± 3.6213.3 ± 9.1
    C820.7 ± 7.6207.7 ± 33.1
    Mo3RightC340.0 ± 10.4451.0 ± 61.7
    C838.0 ± 1.7377.0 ± 10.5
    Mo4RightC368.7 ± 5.8467.3 ± 55.6
    C856.3 ± 13.6466.7 ± 34.1
    • The data from the intact animals were obtained from our previous study (Mo-1 to Mo-4 in Yoshino-Saito et al., 2010).

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (8)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 8
August 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reorganization of Corticospinal Projections after Prominent Recovery of Finger Dexterity from Partial Spinal Cord Injury in Macaque Monkeys
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Reorganization of Corticospinal Projections after Prominent Recovery of Finger Dexterity from Partial Spinal Cord Injury in Macaque Monkeys
Masahiro Sawada, Kimika Yoshino-Saito, Taihei Ninomiya, Takao Oishi, Toshihide Yamashita, Hirotaka Onoe, Masahiko Takada, Yukio Nishimura, Tadashi Isa
eNeuro 19 July 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0209-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0209-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Reorganization of Corticospinal Projections after Prominent Recovery of Finger Dexterity from Partial Spinal Cord Injury in Macaque Monkeys
Masahiro Sawada, Kimika Yoshino-Saito, Taihei Ninomiya, Takao Oishi, Toshihide Yamashita, Hirotaka Onoe, Masahiko Takada, Yukio Nishimura, Tadashi Isa
eNeuro 19 July 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0209-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0209-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • spinal cord injury
  • finger dexterity
  • corticospinal tract
  • functional recovery
  • sprouting
  • primate

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • A progressive ratio task with costly resets reveals adaptive effort-delay tradeoffs
  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Psychedelics Reverse the Polarity of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity in Cortical-Projecting Claustrum Neurons
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • What is the difference between an impulsive and a timed anticipatory movement ?
  • Odor Experience Stabilizes Glomerular Output Representations in Two Mouse Models of Autism
  • Neural Response Attenuates with Decreasing Inter-Onset Intervals Between Sounds in a Natural Soundscape
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.