Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Cognition and Behavior

Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairment Reflects Prefrontal Dysfunction in Aged Common Marmosets

Casey R. Vanderlip, Payton A. Asch, John H. Reynolds and Courtney Glavis-Bloom
eNeuro 8 August 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0187-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0187-23.2023
Casey R. Vanderlip
Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Payton A. Asch
Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John H. Reynolds
Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Courtney Glavis-Bloom
Systems Neurobiology Laboratory, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Simple Discrimination task. A, Four example Simple Discrimination trials. Bottom, Correct and incorrect choices are indicated by an orange dot and red X, respectively. The first two examples show the last two trials of Problem (Prob) 1. The next two examples show the first two trials of Problem 2. B, Errors to criterion by age group. Aged marmosets made more errors to criterion than young marmosets when performance was averaged across all six Simple Discrimination problems. Bars show mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05. C, Correlations between errors to criterion and problem by age group. Young marmosets (open circles) performed equally well on all problems, whereas aged marmosets (black circles) improved their performance over the six Simple Discrimination problems. D, Correlations between errors to criterion and age for each of the Simple Discrimination problems. Strong and significant positive correlations between age and errors to criterion were observed for Problems 1 and 2 but not for Problems 3–6.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Age-related impaired Simple Discrimination performance is accounted for by increased duration of the Latent Phase. A, Representative marmoset learning curve showing performance on one Simple Discrimination problem. Open circle on the curve marks the point at which performance was significantly above chance (50%) and remained so for the duration of the problem. B–C, Correlations between age and number of trials in the Latent Phase (B) and Criterion Phase. C, The duration of the Latent Phase accounts for the age-related impairment on Problems 1 and 2 *p < 0.05.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Serial Reversal task. A, Example of four Serial Reversal task trials. Bottom, Correct and incorrect choices are indicated by an orange dot and red X, respectively. The first two examples show the last two trials of the Simple Discrimination problem that precedes the first reversal. The next two examples show the first two trials of Reversal 1. B, Errors to criterion by age group. Aged marmosets made more errors to criterion than young marmosets when performance was averaged across all five reversals. Bars show mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05. C, Correlations between errors to criterion and reversal by age group. Young marmosets (open circles) performed equally well on all problems, whereas aged marmoset (black circles) performance worsened over the five reversals. D, Correlations between errors to criterion and age for the Simple Discrimination problem and each of the reversals. Strong positive correlations between advancing age and poorer performance existed for all the reversals.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Age-related impaired Serial Reversal performance is accounted for by increased duration of the Dynamic Phase. A, Representative marmoset learning curve showing performance on one reversal. The first trial on the x-axis corresponds to the first trial after the reward contingencies were switched. Bottom left, The lower circle on the curve marks the point at which performance was statistically above 10% accuracy and remained so for the duration of the reversal. Trials before this point are included in the Transition Phase. Top right, The open circle indicates the point at which performance exceeded chance levels (50%) and remained above chance for the remainder of the reversal. Trials above this point are included in the Criterion Phase. Trials between the end of the Transition Phase and beginning of the Criterion Phase are included in the Dynamic Phase. B–D, Correlations between age and number of trials in the Transition Phase (B), Dynamic Phase (C), and Criterion Phase (D). The duration of the Dynamic Phase accounts for the overall age-related impairment in cognitive flexibility (B–D); *p < 0.05.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Simple Discrimination statistics for each problem for each phase

    ProblemLatent PhaseCriterion Phase
    Problem 1rs(9) = 0.68, p = 0.02rs(9) = −0.21, p = 0.54
    Problem 2rs(9) = 0.61, p = 0.05rs(9) = −0.16, p = 0.63
    Problem 3rs(9) = 0.17, p = 0.61rs(9) = 0.03, p = 0.94
    Problem 4rs(9) = 0.47, p = 0.15rs(9) = 0.30, p = 0.38
    Problem 5rs(9) = 0.38, p = 0.25rs(9) = 0.15, p = 0.66
    Problem 6rs(9) = 0.45, p = 0.16rs(9) = 0.19, p = 0.58
    • The length of the Latent Phase changed as a function of age for the first two Simple Discrimination problems but not for any of the later four. The length of the Criterion Phase did not change as a function of age for any of the Simple Discrimination problems.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Serial Reversal statistics for each reversal for each phase

    ReversalTransition PhaseDynamic PhaseCriterion Phase
    Reversal 1rs(5) = 0.67, p = 0.12rs(5) = 0.86, p = 0.02rs(5) = −0.29, p = 0.56
    Reversal 2rs(5) = 0.13, p = 0.79rs(5) = 0.89, p = 0.01rs(5) = 0.07, p = 0.91
    Reversal 3rs(5) = 0.68, p = 0.11rs(5) = 0.68, p = 0.11rs(5) = 0.50, p = 0.25
    Reversal 4rs(5) = 0.71, p = 0.09rs(5) = 0.89, p = 0.01rs(5) = −0.25, p = 0.59
    Reversal 5rs(5) = 0.02, p = 0.67rs(5) = 0.79, p = 0.04rs(5) = 0.21, p = 0.66
    • The length of the Dynamic Phase significantly increased as a function of age, whereas the lengths of the Transition and Criterion Phases did not vary significantly as a function of age.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (8)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 8
August 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairment Reflects Prefrontal Dysfunction in Aged Common Marmosets
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairment Reflects Prefrontal Dysfunction in Aged Common Marmosets
Casey R. Vanderlip, Payton A. Asch, John H. Reynolds, Courtney Glavis-Bloom
eNeuro 8 August 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0187-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0187-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairment Reflects Prefrontal Dysfunction in Aged Common Marmosets
Casey R. Vanderlip, Payton A. Asch, John H. Reynolds, Courtney Glavis-Bloom
eNeuro 8 August 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0187-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0187-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • aging
  • cognition
  • cognitive impairment
  • marmoset
  • prefrontal
  • proactive interference

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Parallel gene expression changes in ventral midbrain dopamine and GABA neurons during normal aging
  • Lactate receptor HCAR1 affects axonal development and contributes to lactate’s protection of axons and myelin in experimental neonatal hypoglycemia
  • Demyelination produces a shift in the population of cortical neurons that synapse with callosal oligodendrocyte progenitor cells
Show more Research Article: New Research

Cognition and Behavior

  • Calcium Dynamics in Hypothalamic Paraventricular Oxytocin Neurons and Astrocytes Associated with Social and Stress Stimuli
  • Touchscreen Response Precision Is Sensitive to the Explore/Exploit Trade-off
  • Eye Movements in Silent Visual Speech Track Unheard Acoustic Signals and Relate to Hearing Experience
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.