Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Neuronal Excitability

Estradiol Receptors Inhibit Long-Term Potentiation in the Dorsomedial Striatum

Valerie J. Lewitus and Kim T. Blackwell
eNeuro 24 July 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0071-23.2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0071-23.2023

Abstract

Estradiol, a female sex hormone and the predominant form of estrogen, has diverse effects throughout the brain including in learning and memory. Estradiol modulates several types of learning that depend on the dorsomedial striatum (DMS), a subregion of the basal ganglia involved in goal-directed learning, cued action-selection, and motor skills. A cellular basis of learning is synaptic plasticity, and the presence of extranuclear estradiol receptors ERα, ERβ, and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) throughout the DMS suggests that estradiol may influence rapid cellular actions including those involved in plasticity. To test whether estradiol affects synaptic plasticity in the DMS, corticostriatal long-term potentiation (LTP) was induced using theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in ex vivo brain slices from intact male and female C57BL/6 mice. Extracellular field recordings showed that female mice in the diestrous stage of the estrous cycle exhibited LTP similar to male mice, while female mice in estrus did not exhibit LTP. Furthermore, antagonists of ERα or GPER rescued LTP in estrous females and agonists of ERα or GPER reduced LTP in diestrous females. In males, activating ERα but not GPER reduced LTP. These results uncover an inhibitory action of estradiol receptors on cellular learning in the DMS and suggest a cellular mechanism underlying the impairment in certain types of DMS-based learning observed in the presence of high estradiol. Because of the dorsal striatum’s role in substance use disorders, these findings may provide a mechanism underlying an estradiol-mediated progression from goal-directed to habitual drug use.

Significance Statement

This study examined the role of the female reproductive cycle and female sex hormones in synaptic plasticity, a cellular process that underlies learning behavior, in a brain region involved in goal-directed learning. Synaptic plasticity was similar between male mice and female mice in the low estradiol phase of the cycle. In contrast, female mice in a high estradiol phase of the cycle did not exhibit synaptic plasticity. The effect of estradiol was mediated by two of the three estradiol receptors found in the brain. The results have implications for the role of the female reproductive cycle in the development of drug addiction, which involves a progression from goal-directed learning to habit-based learning as drug use switches from recreational to compulsive.

Introduction

Estradiol, the primary form of the sex hormone class estrogen, has a number of neurologic functions, including a role in modulating learning that is associated with the dorsal striatum. This brain region is part of the basal ganglia and is involved in motor skill learning, goal-directed behavior, habit learning, and drug abuse. While sensorimotor performance is enhanced in the presence of estradiol (Becker et al., 1987), several types of learning that involve dorsal striatal circuits are impaired, such as cued learning and response learning (Zurkovsky et al., 2007; V.C. Wang et al., 2009; Neese et al., 2010).

Estradiol is also known to influence the course of addictive behavior, which heavily involves dorsal striatal circuits. Dorsal striatal activity is involved in acquisition of drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviors. During the development of substance use disorders, control over drug-taking shifts from goal-directed learning in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) to habit-based learning in the dorsolateral striatum (DLS) as drug use switches from recreational to compulsive (Yin et al., 2009; Corbit et al., 2012; Murray et al., 2012; Gremel and Costa, 2013; Lipton et al., 2019). Higher estradiol leads to more rapid drug-taking behavior in female rats, and female rats acquire self-administration of drugs more rapidly than male rats (Lynch and Carroll, 1999; Jackson et al., 2006; Becker and Hu, 2008). In humans, observations among individuals susceptible to substance use disorders reveal that women progress into habitual drug use more quickly than men (Piazza et al., 1989; Becker, 2016; Quigley et al., 2021). The more rapid development of habitual drug-taking may be because of weaker control of reward-sensitive, goal-directed behavior by the DMS. Understanding the effects of estradiol in the DMS will further the understanding of gender differences in substance use disorder.

The three main types of estradiol receptors, ERα, ERβ, and G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), are found throughout the dorsal striatum, but their mechanism of action in pathways underlying learning in this area is not well understood. The receptors are found exclusively outside the nucleus in dorsal striatal neurons of adult mice (Almey et al., 2012), suggesting nongenomic effects. Studies on other brain regions have found that estradiol receptors acting through intracellular signaling pathways can affect spine growth, receptor trafficking, and protein synthesis (Taxier et al., 2020). However, studies of the effect of estradiol on dorsal striatal processes are limited. ERα and ERβ are clustered with mGluR3 (Gi/o-coupled receptor), and ERα also is clustered separately with mGluR5 (Gq-coupled receptor; Grove-Strawser et al., 2010). The pathways activated by ER interactions with mGluR3 and mGluR5 have opposing actions on L-type calcium currents (Mermelstein et al., 1996) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation (Grove-Strawser et al., 2010). The third ER type, GPER, leads to activation of the Gs-coupled signaling pathway (Thomas et al., 2010; Evans et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2018). It is unknown what role, if any, these ERs play in corticostriatal plasticity. While one study has found that estradiol receptor activity is necessary for long-term potentiation (LTP) in the DLS of male mice (Tozzi et al., 2015), it is unknown whether this is also the case in the DMS or in female mice. The aforementioned findings of impairment by estradiol on dorsal striatal-based learning in females suggest that the hormone may have an inhibitory effect on corticostriatal LTP.

This study tested the hypothesis that estradiol during estrus impairs plasticity in the DMS of female mice. A theta-burst stimulation (TBS) protocol was used to induce corticostriatal LTP in the DMS of C57BL/6 male and female mice. Results demonstrate that male mice and female mice in the low estradiol stage of diestrus undergo LTP, but female mice in estrus do not. Estradiol receptor agonists and antagonists were then used to determine the role of estradiol receptors in this LTP effect. It was found that blocking either ERα or GPER rescued LTP in estrous mice and activating either ERα or GPER inhibited LTP in diestrous mice. In male mice, on the other hand, ERα activation blocked LTP but GPER activation did not. The findings indicate that estradiol impairs DMS synaptic plasticity through the actions of ERα in males, and through both ERα and GPER in females.

Materials and Methods

All animal procedures were performed in accordance with George Mason University’s institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) regulation and followed the National Institutes of Health animal welfare standards. Every measure was taken to minimize stress and the number of mice used. C57BL/6 mice were group-housed in Teklad 7099 TEK-Fresh (wood pulp) bedding with same-sex littermates in a standard 12/12 h light/dark cycle in a light-controlled and temperature-controlled facility with ad libitum access to food and water.

Male and female mice aged 50–100 d were anesthetized using isoflurane and brains were extracted into oxygenated, ice-cold slicing solution (in mm: 2.8 KCl, 10 dextrose, 26.2 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 7 Mg2SO4, and 210 sucrose). Coronal brain slices 350 μm in thickness were created using a Leica Vibratome 1000S and were incubated in oxygenated artificial CSF (ACSF; in mm: 126 NaCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2.8 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 Mg2SO4, 26.2 NaHCO3, and 11 dextrose) for 40 min at 33°C and then 40 min at room temperature (24–25°C). Ingredients for the slicing solution and ACSF were purchased from Fisher Scientific.

Estrous status in female mice was determined through cytological assessment of vaginal smears collected through lavage immediately following decapitation, which occurred between the hours of 12 and 2 P.M. Diestrus was characterized by a high prevalence of leukocytes and an absence or low prevalence of cornified or nucleated epithelial cells. Estrus was characterized by a high prevalence of cornified epithelial cells, an absence or low prevalence of nucleated epithelial cells, and an absence of leukocytes.

Slices were perfused with 30–32°C oxygenated ACSF containing 50 μm picrotoxin (Tocris Bioscience) at a rate of 2.5 ml/min in a submersion recording chamber. A tungsten bipolar stimulating electrode (A-M Systems, 796500) was used to inject current into the corpus callosum overlying the dorsomedial striatum (DMS; Fig. 1A). Current was injected in pulses of 0.05 ms. Field recordings of the voltage response from a population of neurons (pop spike) within the DMS were recorded using a borosilicate glass pipette (Sutter Instrument, BF150-75-10) containing ACSF.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Recording protocol. A, Location of stimulation electrode (black lines) in the corpus callosum and recording electrode pipette (red lines) in the dorsomedial striatum (blue area) of coronal brain slice. B, Input-output curve (mean pop spike size vs stimulation current) in male, diestrous, and estrous mice. Input current ranged from 0.1 to 1.5 mA. Error bars show +/– one standard error. N: sample size. C, Stimulation protocol for entire recording consisted of 15 min of baseline, theta-burst stimulation (TBS), and 30 min of follow-up. D, TBS protocol consisted of 10 trains of 10 bursts at 10.5 Hz, with each burst containing four pulses at 50 Hz. One train is illustrated.

Pop spike amplitude was measured by taking the absolute value of the difference between the negative peak of the trace after the stimulation artifact and either the positive peak immediately preceding the negative peak or the mean voltage of the trace immediately before the stimulation artifact, whichever was greater (Lovinger et al., 1993; Hawes et al., 2013). The signal was filtered through a four-pole, low pass Bessel filter with a cutoff frequency of 5 kHz (Warner LPF-100B), amplified by an electrometer (Warner IE-251A), and sampled at 20 kHz using LabView.

In order to determine the current amplitude to use for each experiment, an input-output curve was conducted, measuring the pop spike response across a range of current amplitudes (Fig. 1B). The current that would produce 40–60% of maximal response was selected for the remainder of the experiment.

The recording protocol using this selected current amplitude was comprised of three sections: a baseline recording, theta-burst stimulation, and a follow-up recording (Fig. 1C). The baseline pop spike recording was performed by taking measurements of pop spikes in response to a pulse every 30 s. This was run until the baseline had no discernable slope for at least 15 min. Experiments in which the baseline slope during the last 15 min exceeded ±0.01/min were excluded from analysis. Experiments with average baseline sizes exceeding 1.3 mV were also excluded.

The baseline was followed by TBS to induce long-term potentiation (LTP; Hawes et al., 2013; Fig. 1D). The TBS protocol consisted of 10 trains of 10 bursts with four pulses in each burst. The inter-train interval was 15 s. The interburst interval was set at a frequency of 10.5 Hz and the interpulse interval at 50 Hz. Finally, a follow-up was conducted for 30 min using the same, 0.033-Hz pulse frequency as the baseline.

During experiments with estradiol receptor agonists and antagonists, ACSF containing the drug was perfused throughout the baseline, TBS, and follow-up. Drugs were purchased from Cayman Chemical and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide: propylpyrazoletriol (PPT; 0.1 μm, Cayman Chemical), methyl-piperidino-pyrazole (MPP) dihydrochloride (3 μm, Tocris), 4-[2-Phenyl-5,7-bis(trifluoromethyl) pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl]phenol (PHTPP, Cayman Chemical; 1 μm), G1 (0.1 μm, Cayman Chemical), and G15 (0.5 μm, Cayman Chemical). Concentrations were chosen based on previous usage in slice electrophysiology (Kumar et al., 2015; Bálint et al., 2016; W. Wang et al., 2018).

Data analysis was performed using custom python scripts, freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/neurord/ephys_anal/releases/tag/v1.0). Statistical analysis (Table 1) was performed using the software SAS. Figures were created through IGOR Pro, version 8.

View this table:
Table 1

Statistical table

Results

Long-term potentiation does not occur in the DMS of female mice in estrus

Dorsal striatal-based behaviors and learning differ between males and females and, as seen in rodents, across stages of the estrous cycle where estradiol fluctuates (Korol and Pisani, 2015; Becker, 2016; Meitzen et al., 2018). Since LTP is a cellular mechanism of learning, this study investigated whether the observed behavioral differences may be associated with differences in LTP between sexes or across the estrous cycle.

LTP was induced using a TBS protocol in ex vivo coronal brain slices of male, female diestrous, and female estrous mice. Pop spikes before and after LTP induction were measured using extracellular field recordings. Estrous status was determined using vaginal cytology following decapitation. Uteri were extracted and weighed 15–20 min after decapitation. A Wilcoxon two-sample test determined that the mice that were categorized into the estrus stage had significantly higher uterus weights than those categorized into diestrus, Z = −4.38, p < 0.0001a (Fig. 2), confirming the assessment of estrous status.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Uterus weight from diestrous and estrous mice. Each point represents a separate mouse. Mice in estrus had heavier uteri than diestrous mice (p < 0.01). Each marker shows a different mouse. **: significant difference at p < 0.01.

Before collecting a baseline pop spike amplitude, an input-output curve was measured to select the current that produced 40–60% of maximal response. The shape of the input-output curve appeared different across sexes and estrous status: males had the greatest pop spike response to higher currents and estrous females had the lowest (Fig. 1B). Consequently, the mean baseline pop spike size differed among these groups: a one-factor generalized linear model showed a significant difference among males, diestrous females, and estrous females, F(3,106) = 3.29, p = 0.041b. A Tukey–Kramer post hoc test revealed the estrous group had a lower mean baseline pop spike amplitude than males (p = 0.032b1) but not diestrous females (p = 0.23b2). Male and diestrous female baselines did not differ (p = 0.70b3). To ensure that the baseline size itself was not producing differences among groups, for each section below, baseline size was compared among groups, and for those with differences, the effect of baseline pop spike amplitude on LTP was tested.

Males and diestrous females both exhibited LTP, where normalized pop spike size increased ∼25% from baseline in males and ∼40% in diestrus females, but LTP was not observed in estrous females (Fig. 3A–C). The estrous groups exhibited a short-term depression lasting ∼10 min after induction. A one-factor generalized linear model across male, diestrous female, and estrous female groups revealed an overall significant difference between groups at 30 min after induction (F(2,24) = 6.29, p = 0.0064c). Tukey–Kramer post hoc comparisons indicated that at 30 min, normalized pop spike size was significantly greater in diestrous females (p = 0.0062c1) than in estrous females (Fig. 3C). Pop spike size at 30 min did not differ between males and diestrous females (p = 0.34c2) or males and estrous females (p = 0.053c3). This indicated that LTP occurred following TBS in diestrous females but not in estrous females.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

LTP occurs in males and diestrous females but not in estrous females. A, Normalized pop spike size over time. Both male and diestrous females exhibited increased pop spike size after TBS (black arrow). Pop spike size in estrous females did not increase above baseline. Error bars show +/– one standard error. B, Representative traces showing pop spikes before (black) and after (red) TBS. Scale bars show 0.2 mV and 1 ms. Traces were chosen based on representation of mean change at 30 min after TBS. C, Comparison of normalized pop spike size at 30 min after TBS. Each marker represents a different brain slice. Diestrous females had a significantly greater normalized pop spike size compared with estrous females (*p < 0.05).

To verify that estrus was the factor impairing LTP, additional tests assessed whether baseline pop spike amplitude differed between groups and whether mouse age influenced pop spike size at 30 min. A one-way generalized linear model showed no difference in baseline pop spike size between male, diestrous female, and estrous female groups in the no drug condition (F(2,24) = 0.97, p = 0.39d). An analysis of covariance was run using sex and estrous status as factor, and age as covariate to determine whether age predicted pop spike amplitude at 30 min. This test showed that age was not significant, (F(1,23) = 0.09, p = 0.77e). These results demonstrate that estrous status, and not baseline size or age, is responsible for group differences in LTP.

ERα and GPER inhibit corticostriatal long-term potentiation in female mice

Estradiol in the striatum and other brain tissue correlates with blood plasma levels (Bixo et al., 1986); thus, it was expected that estradiol receptor (ER) activation was lower in brain slice during diestrus, a stage when estradiol levels are lowest, than during estrus. Accordingly, based on the above finding that LTP in the DMS could be induced during diestrus but not during estrus, it was hypothesized that this hormone’s actions on ERs have inhibitory effects on LTP. To test this hypothesis, TBS was run in the presence of ER antagonists and agonists to determine the ER subtypes responsible for inhibiting LTP.

First, this study tested whether LTP could be rescued in estrous females using antagonists of each of ERα, ERβ, or G-protein-coupled ER (GPER). The results were compared with the no drug TBS condition (Fig. 4A,B). A significant difference was found using a one-factor generalized linear model across estrous groups at 30 min (F(3,26) = 6.15, p = 0.0026f). A post hoc test using Dunnett adjustment for multiple comparisons revealed that the normalized pop spike at 30 min was significantly higher with the ERα antagonist MPP (p = 0.044f1) and the GPER antagonist G15 (p = 0.0085f2) than the no drug control, while the ERβ antagonist PHTPP had no effect (p = 0.94f3). The G15 antagonist also prevented the short-term depression seen in the no drug condition. Baseline pop spike amplitude did not differ among these estrus groups (F(3,26) = 1.71, p = 0.19g). Thus, TBS-induced corticostriatal LTP can only be induced in the absence of either ERα or GPER activity.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Blocking ERα or GPER rescues LTP in estrous females. A, Normalized pop spike size over time in the presence (light purple) or absence (dark purple) of antagonists for ERβ (1 μm PHTPP, top), ERα (3 μm MPP dihydrochloride, middle), and GPER (0.5 μm G15, bottom). Error bars show +/– one standard error. B, Comparison of normalized pop spike size at 30 min after TBS. Pop spike size increased from baseline in the presence of MPP or G15 but not in the presence of PHTPP (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

In diestrous females, TBS was run in the presence of ERα or GPER agonists to mimic a higher estradiol level and determine whether LTP would be inhibited by actions of a single ER type. Induction of LTP at 30 min was compared with the no drug diestrous group (Fig. 5A,B). ERβ agonism was excluded because of nonsignificant findings from the antagonist (Fig. 4). A main effect of drug was found using a one-factor generalized linear model (F(3,29) = 5.27, p = 0.0050h). A post hoc test using Dunnett adjustment for multiple comparisons determined that the ERα agonist PPT (p = 0.0052h1) and the GPER agonist G1 (p = 0.017h2) had a significantly lower pop spike magnitude than the no drug control. Because neither agonist completely blocked LTP, additional recordings were performed in the presence of the two agonists combined. LTP was further reduced in the presence of both PPT and GPER (p = 0.0026h3). Baseline pop spike amplitude did not differ among these diestrous groups (F(3,29) = 0.84, p = 0.48i). Therefore, both ERα and GPER activity inhibits LTP in the dorsomedial striatum of female mice.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Activating ERα or GPER blocks LTP in diestrus females. A, Normalized pop spike size over time in the presence (light red) or absence (dark red) of agonists for ERα (0.1 μm PPT, top), GPER (0.1 μm G1, middle), or both (bottom). Error bars show +/– one standard error. B, Comparison of normalized pop spike size at 30 min after TBS. All three drug groups had a significantly lower pop spike size than the no drug group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01).

ERα inhibits corticostriatal long-term potentiation in male mice

The next question was whether the same effects of ERα and GPER activation and antagonism on corticostriatal LTP would be seen in male mice (Fig. 6). Males were tested because of the presence of circulating estradiol, though their levels are lower than observed in intact females (Morissette and Di Paolo, 1993; Fester et al., 2012). Additionally, males have aromatase in the dorsal striatum, indicating that there is local production of estradiol there (Küppers and Beyer, 1998). They also express similar levels of ERs as females (Küppers and Beyer, 1999; Quigley and Becker, 2021). Both agonists and antagonists were tested because, unlike in females, estradiol does not fluctuate in males, thus an increase or decrease in ER activity may shift male corticostriatal plasticity.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Activating ERα but not GPER blocks LTP in males. A, Normalized pop spike size over time in the no drug condition (dark blue) and in the presence of the ERα agonist (0.1 μm PPT, light blue) and antagonist (3 μm MPP, green). Error bars show +/– one standard error. B, Representative traces showing pop spikes before (black) and after (red) TBS with the ERα agonist (top) and antagonist (bottom). Scale bars show 0.2 mV and 1 ms. Traces were chosen based on representation of mean change at 30 min after TBS. C, Comparison of normalized pop spike size at 30 min after TBS. Pop spike size in the presence of PPT was significantly lower than the no drug control (*p < 0.05). The MPP group did not differ. D, Normalized pop spike size over time in the no drug condition (dark blue) and in the presence of the GPER agonist (0.1 μm G1, light blue) and antagonist (0.5 μm G15, green). E, Representative traces showing pop spikes before (black) and after (red) TBS with the GPER agonist (top) and antagonist (bottom). Scale bars show 0.2 mV and 1 ms. Traces were chosen based on representation of mean change at 30 min after TBS. F, Comparison of normalized pop spike size at 30 min after TBS. No differences among groups.

First, the role of ERα in LTP in males was tested. The ERα agonist PPT resulted in a clear decrease in pop spike size from the no drug condition (Fig. 6A), similar to what was observed in diestrous females (Fig. 5). The ERα antagonist MPP slightly reduced pop spike size (Fig. 4). To determine whether these observed differences were significant, a one-factor generalized linear model was run and a main effect of ERα drug was found (F(2,25) = 4.06, p = 0.030j). Dunnett’s post hoc comparisons indicated that the ERα agonist PPT produced a significantly lower pop spike size at 30 min than the no drug control (p = 0.017j1). The antagonist MPP did not significantly change pop spike size from the no drug control group (p = 0.38j2; Fig. 6C). Baseline pop spike size differed among the male groups (F(2,25) = 9.21, p = 0.001k), where the no drug condition was significantly lower than the PPT (p = 0.0041k1) and MPP (p = 0.0039k2) groups. Despite this difference, pop spike size at 30 min was not predicted by baseline pop spike amplitude (F(1,24) = 0.16, p = 0.70l). This indicates that ERα activation inhibits LTP in the male mouse DMS but, as expected in low levels of estradiol, LTP is not enhanced on inhibition of ERα.

When LTP induction was tested in the presence of the GPER agonist G1 or the GPER antagonist G15, both drugs appeared to decrease pop spike size by about half (Fig. 6D). However, statistical analysis using a one-factor generalized linear model revealed no differences between the no drug condition and the G1 and G15 groups (F(2,27) = 2.50, p = 0.10m; Fig. 6F). These results indicate that, unlike in females, GPER activation does not prevent LTP induction in male mice.

Discussion

This study examined the effect of the estrous cycle and estradiol receptors (ERs) on synaptic plasticity in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS). The results showed that long-term potentiation (LTP) can be induced using theta-burst stimulation (TBS) in the DMS of diestrous mice, and that the amplitude is comparable to male mice, but that LTP induction is hindered during the estrous stage of the cycle. Experiments further demonstrated that ERα and GPER are modulating LTP induction. Specifically, corticostriatal LTP occurs in estrous mice when either ERα or GPER is blocked. In diestrous mice, when circulating estradiol levels are low, using an ERα or GPER agonist impairs LTP. In male mice, the ERα agonist impairs LTP but the GPER agonist does not, and neither the ERα nor the GPER antagonist has a significant effect. Collectively, these findings demonstrate a novel role of estradiol in corticostriatal LTP and offer a new context for the current understanding of the hormone’s actions in the DMS.

Estradiol may be controlling LTP through its modulation of striatal neuron properties. Spiny projection neurons (SPNs) in the dorsal striatum of mice exhibit reduced excitability during estrus compared with other stages of the cycle, as evidenced by a higher rheobase, higher action potential threshold, and lower action potential amplitude (Willett et al., 2020). The role that ERs play in these changes is unclear. In the rat ventral striatum, miniature EPSC (mEPSC) frequency fluctuates across the estrous cycle and estradiol modifies mEPSC frequency and neuron excitability (Proaño et al., 2018, 2020; Krentzel et al., 2019). However, in the rat dorsal striatum, no effect of estradiol on excitability has been observed, regardless of estrous status (Krentzel et al., 2019). These observations in the rat striatum do not imply that estradiol does not play a role in mouse dorsal striatal SPN properties: there may be an interspecies difference in estradiol action on SPNs, or it is possible that evoked, instead of spontaneous, synaptic input is altered by estradiol. Alternatively, while SPNs are a logical target to study estradiol’s effects in the striatum because they comprise over 90% of striatal neurons (Kemp and Powell, 1971; Bolam et al., 2000), it cannot be ruled out that the effect of estrus is because of estradiol action on interneurons, although a recent related study found no evidence of estradiol affecting cholinergic interneuron excitability (Kövesdi et al., 2023). Another possibility is that estradiol’s effect on striatal circuitry underlying LTP may come from another source, such as dopamine neurotransmission.

Dopamine is critical for synaptic plasticity in the DMS; thus, it is crucial to consider estradiol’s effect on dopamine as a mechanism for controlling LTP. Higher estradiol levels result in higher dopamine availability in the dorsal striatum, as evidenced by higher basal extracellular dopamine during estrus than during diestrus (Xiao and Becker, 1994) and by increased stimulated dopamine release in the striatum during estrus or after estradiol infusions (Becker and Beer, 1986; Becker, 1990; Castner et al., 1993; Becker and Rudick, 1999; Shams et al., 2016; Calipari et al., 2017; Song et al., 2019). This increased release may be an indirect result from estradiol’s reduction of GABA release (Hu et al., 2006; Schultz et al., 2009). Despite the consensus on the effect of estradiol on dopamine release, the effect that enhanced dopamine has on plasticity is less clear. Heightened dopamine availability could have opposing effects on plasticity, depending on which downstream targets are affected. Corticostriatal LTP requires dopamine D1 receptor activity (Calabresi et al., 2000; Kerr and Wickens, 2001; Reynolds and Wickens, 2002; Hawes et al., 2013). On the other hand, D2 receptor activity induces long-term depression (LTD) through retrograde endocannabinoid signaling (Gerdeman et al., 2002; Kreitzer and Malenka, 2005). Perhaps the absence of LTP seen in estrus is because of increased dopamine binding to D2 receptors. Indeed, some studies have found that estradiol increases D2 receptor density (Fernández-Ruiz et al., 1989; Ursic et al., 2003); however, these effects are dependent on factors such as estradiol dosage and length of time applied (Roy et al., 1990; Bazzett and Becker, 1994). D2 receptors are involved in LTD through D2-receptor-containing SPNs (Calabresi et al., 1992; Kreitzer and Malenka, 2005) as well as through reduction of cholinergic interneuron activity, which can facilitate LTD in both D1R and D2R SPNs (Z. Wang et al., 2006). Future studies comparing LTP between identified D1-receptor-containing and D2-receptor-containing striatal neurons may be able to determine whether estradiol’s effect on dopamine is responsible for the impairment in LTP.

There are a variety of other mechanisms through which ERα and GPER could be affecting LTP in the dorsal striatum. From research in males, corticostriatal LTP involves depolarization of SPNs, leading to calcium influx and subsequent activation of kinase pathways that cause LTP (Kreitzer and Malenka, 2008; Lovinger, 2010). Estradiol receptors could be targeting any of the components of this pathway. One possible mechanism is through reducing calcium influx through voltage-dependent calcium channels because of a reduction in excitability (Willett et al., 2020). This lower calcium would reduce the activation of calcium-dependent kinases critical for LTP, such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII; Q. Wang et al., 2017) and protein kinase C (PKC; Gubellini et al., 2004; Hawes et al., 2013). For more specific methods through which estradiol affects LTP, pathways activated by individual receptors, ERα and GPER, must be explored.

ERα coupling to mGluR may be its mechanism of action in inhibiting LTP. A subset of ERα activates mGluR5 (Grove-Strawser et al., 2010), which is a Gq-coupled receptor. The level of calcium influx may determine whether Gq signaling leads to LTP or LTD (Kim et al., 2013). Under this model, a higher calcium level leads to processes that result in LTP via PKC activation, and a lower calcium level leads to processes that result in LTD via production of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG). As previously discussed, the lower excitability of SPNs during estrus could result in lower calcium influx in response to cortical input. Perhaps the ERα-mediated Gq activity in a lower-calcium environment results in the occurrence of LTD in some synapses after TBS, leading to no net increase in synaptic strength as measured by field recording. Another downstream target of mGluR5 is extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK; Choe and Wang, 2001; Yang et al., 2004; Mao et al., 2005), whose downstream targets lead to LTP (Xie et al., 2009; Cerovic et al., 2013; Hawes et al., 2013), as well as LTD (Cui et al., 2011) and depotentiation (Cerovic et al., 2015), although the conditions that determine the end result of ERK phosphorylation are unclear. This route indicates that ERα could be preventing bidirectional plasticity, and further investigation should be conducted into whether LTD occurs in the presence of ERα activation.

Another route through which LTP could be inhibited by ERα is through the ER’s association with another type of mGluR. A separate subset of ERα activates the Gi/o-coupled receptor mGluR3 (Grove-Strawser et al., 2010), which is located presynaptically on the terminals of cortical neurons and whose activation reduces calcium influx, and therefore glutamate release (Kupferschmidt and Lovinger, 2015). Less glutamate release would reduce the activation of postsynaptic glutamate receptors on SPNs involved in LTP induction, including AMPA and NMDA receptors, which are required for LTP (Calabresi et al., 1992; Partridge et al., 2000; Malinow and Malenka, 2002; Malenka, 2003; Lüscher and Malenka, 2012; Hawes et al., 2013). An ERα mediated increase in mGluR3 activity on cortical terminals could therefore be a separate mechanism through which ERα can affect LTP. ERα mediated changes in mGluR3 activity also may explain the reduced response to current injection seen in the input-output curve in the present study (Fig. 1B).

GPER’s mechanism of action in inhibiting LTP could be either through its own G-protein activity or through the reinforcement of ERα activity. GPER is a Gs-coupled receptor (Thomas et al., 2010; Filardo and Thomas, 2012; Evans et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2018). While Gs activity is known to be involved in LTP through its downstream target protein kinase A (PKA; Spencer and Murphy, 2002; Hawes et al., 2013), a negative feedback loop involving elevated activity of phosphodiesterase (PDE) consequent to prolonged elevation of Gs activity could act paradoxically to reduce PKA activity during LTP (Lim et al., 1999; Houslay and Adams, 2003). Specifically, a higher basal level of Gs pathway activity throughout proestrus and estrus because of estradiol activation of GPER could result in enhanced PKA and PDE activity during estrus, which can reduce cAMP activity during TBS, thereby inhibiting PKA pathways required for LTP. Alternatively, GPER could be enhancing the activity of ERα. The interaction between these two receptors (Micevych and Christensen, 2012; Bourque et al., 2015; Acramel and Jacquot, 2022) could explain how either GPER activation or ERα activation inhibits LTP in diestrous females. ERα may be allosterically modulated by GPER to prevent LTP, which would explain why GPER inhibition alone is sufficient to rescue LTP. This mechanism may also explain why GPER activation did not prevent LTP in males; perhaps the estradiol level in males is too low to produce a high enough level of ERα activity for GPER modulation to have an effect. There are thus many possibilities through which these receptors could be inhibiting LTP, and this will be an important area of research moving forward, as it is crucial to understanding the complexity of estradiol’s involvement in general synaptic dynamics underlying learning.

The LTP deficits uncovered by this study may underlie learning impairments in dorsal striatum-based behaviors observed in the presence of high estradiol. Dorsal striatal learning is underpinned by synaptic plasticity (Reynolds et al., 2001; Yin et al., 2009; Shan et al., 2014, 2015; Hawes et al., 2015). The inhibition of LTP would be expected to result in poorer performance in learning tasks. Reflecting the current study’s finding that ER activity inhibits LTP, past research has demonstrated that several types of learning that involve the dorsal striatum are impaired in the presence of higher estradiol levels. Rats given subcutaneous estradiol perform worse in cued learning (Galea et al., 2001; Daniel and Lee, 2004; V.C. Wang et al., 2008, 2009), response learning (Davis et al., 2005; Pleil et al., 2011), and spatial alternation (V.C. Wang et al., 2008, 2009; Neese et al., 2010). All of these learning strategies are known to involve dorsal striatal circuits (Packard et al., 1989; Packard and McGaugh, 1996; Balleine, 2005; Yin et al., 2005a, b; Lee et al., 2008; Moussa et al., 2011). A particularly well-characterized example of estradiol’s differential effects on learning is the switch in learning types from dorsal striatal-based learning strategies to hippocampal-based learning strategies. The bias in learning strategy between dorsal striatum-based learning and hippocampal-based learning fluctuates across the estrous cycle according to estradiol level, where higher estradiol stages favor place learning over response or cued learning (Korol et al., 2004; Yagi et al., 2017). This bias toward hippocampal strategies over dorsal striatal strategies can also be observed when estradiol is injected subcutaneously (Korol and Kolo, 2002; Davis et al., 2005; Quinlan et al., 2008; Hussain et al., 2016) or directly into the dorsal striatum (Quinlan et al., 2013). One study found that subcutaneous injection of the ERα agonist PPT alone is enough to produce this shift in learning strategy (Pisani et al., 2016). Estradiol also enhances other types of hippocampal-based learning such as object placement and recognition memory (Walf et al., 2006; Paris and Frye, 2008; Inagaki et al., 2010, 2012; Phan et al., 2012, 2015; Jacome et al., 2016; Luine et al., 2018). Consistent with this switch, estradiol is necessary for and enhances synaptic plasticity in hippocampus (S.G. Warren et al., 1995; Foy et al., 1999; Smith and McMahon, 2006; Grassi et al., 2011; Hasegawa et al., 2015; Lu et al., 2019). In addition, excitability and spine density in the hippocampus both fluctuate across the estrous cycle, with highest excitability during proestrus and estrus, and higher spine densities observed during stages with high estradiol and progesterone (Kubo et al., 1975; Woolley and McEwen, 1992; Scharfman et al., 2003; Kato et al., 2013; Jaric et al., 2019). Therefore, the results of the current study are congruous with the growing body of literature indicating that estradiol’s effect on synaptic plasticity parallels its effect on the learning types that involve this plasticity. In other words, estradiol may be a regulator of behavioral strategy through control of synaptic plasticity, e.g., selecting between hippocampal and striatal strategies depending on high versus low estradiol, respectively.

The relevance of these results to behavior may extend to pathology as well. A major component of striatal-based behavior that is influenced by estradiol is habit formation, which contributes to addictive behaviors. Among individuals in treatment for drug abuse, women are observed to develop habitual drug use more quickly than men (Piazza et al., 1989; Becker et al., 2017; Quigley et al., 2021) and can exhibit different levels of craving and relapse across the menstrual cycle (Allen et al., 2009; Franklin et al., 2015; Carlson et al., 2017; Hayaki et al., 2020; J.G. Warren et al., 2021). In rodent studies, chronic estradiol treatment leads to quicker acquisition of cocaine, nicotine, and methamphetamine self-administration than in estradiol-depleted females (Jackson et al., 2006; Larson et al., 2007; Kucerova et al., 2009; Flores et al., 2016). These effects, however, are dose and drug dependent, as increasing estradiol doses can reduce cocaine intake (Hu and Becker, 2008), and estradiol-depleted rats exhibit higher opiate self-administration than those treated with estradiol (Sharp et al., 2021). During habit formation, behavior changes from goal-directed to goal-independent (habitual) as control over drug intake switches from the DMS to the dorsolateral striatum (DLS; Corbit et al., 2012; Malvaez, 2020). It has been hypothesized that the control does not simply shift, but that there is a competition between these two subregions, where stronger connections in one subregion will bias dominance over behavior to that subregion. Indeed, inhibiting the DLS produces a return to goal-directed behavior and inhibiting the DMS produces habitual behavior (Yin and Knowlton, 2006). Perhaps higher estradiol promotes the development of habitual behavior as it weakens DMS-based, goal-directed learning. The effect of estradiol in the DLS of females is unknown, but in males it has been demonstrated to be necessary for LTP (Tozzi et al., 2015). Estradiol’s action on the mechanisms underlying learning in the dorsal striatum may be a key component in understanding the hormone’s role in substance use disorders.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank Kritika Sedhai and Esprit Blatchford-Rodriguez for technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • K.T.B. was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant R01 016022 and National Institute on Drug Abuse Grants R01 038890 and R01 056113. V.J.L. was supported by a Presidential Scholarship and Dissertation Completion grant from George Mason University.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Acramel A, Jacquot Y (2022) Deciphering of a putative GPER recognition domain in ERα and ERα36. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:943343–943344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.943343 pmid:35846328
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Allen SS, Allen AM, Lunos S, Hatsukami DK (2009) Patterns of self-selected smoking cessation attempts and relapse by menstrual phase. Addict Behav 34:928–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.05.013 pmid:19501984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Almey A, Filardo EJ, Milner TA, Brake WG (2012) Estrogen receptors are found in glia and at extranuclear neuronal sites in the dorsal striatum of female rats: evidence for cholinergic but not dopaminergic colocalization. Endocrinology 153:5373–5383. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1458 pmid:22919059
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Bálint F, Liposits Z, Farkas I (2016) Estrogen receptor beta and 2-arachidonoylglycerol mediate the suppressive effects of estradiol on frequency of postsynaptic currents in gonadotropin-releasing hormone neurons of metestrous mice: an acute slice electrophysiological study. Front Cell Neurosci 10:77–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00077 pmid:27065803
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    Balleine BW (2005) Neural bases of food-seeking: affect, arousal and reward in corticostriatolimbic circuits. Physiol Behav 86:717–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.061 pmid:16257019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bazzett TJ, Becker JB (1994) Sex differences in the rapid and acute effects of estrogen on striatal D2 dopamine receptor binding. Brain Res 637:163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(94)91229-7 pmid:8180794
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Becker JB (1990) Direct effect of 17 beta‐estradiol on striatum: sex differences in dopamine release. Synapse 5:157–164. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.890050211 pmid:2309159
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Becker JB (2016) Sex differences in addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 18:395–402. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/jbecker pmid:28179811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Becker JB, Beer ME (1986) The influence of estrogen on nigrostriatal dopamine activity: behavioral and neurochemical evidence for both pre- and postsynaptic components. Behav Brain Res 19:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(86)90044-6 pmid:3954864
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Becker JB, Rudick CN (1999) Rapid effects of estrogen or progesterone on the amphetamine-induced increase in striatal dopamine are enhanced by estrogen priming: a microdialysis study. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00091-x pmid:10494997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Becker JB, Hu M (2008) Sex differences in drug abuse. Front Neuroendocrinol 29:36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003 pmid:17904621
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Becker JB, Snyder PJ, Miller MM, Westgate SA, Jenuwine MJ (1987) The influence of estrous cycle and intrastriatal estradiol on sensorimotor performance in the female rat. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(87)90476-x pmid:3615546
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Becker JB, McClellan ML, Reed BG (2017) Sex differences, gender and addiction. J Neurosci Res 95:136–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.23963 pmid:27870394
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Bixo M, Bäckström T, Winblad B, Selstam G, Andersson A (1986) Comparison between pre- and postovulatory distributions of oestradiol and progesterone in the brain of the PMSG-treated rat. Acta Physiol Scand 128:241–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1986.tb07972.x pmid:3776647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Bolam JP, Hanley JJ, Booth PAC, Bevan MD (2000) Synaptic organisation of the basal ganglia. J Anat 196 [Pt 4]:527–542. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2000.19640527.x pmid:10923985
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Bourque M, Morissette M, Di Paolo T (2015) Neuroprotection in Parkinsonian-treated mice via estrogen receptor α activation requires G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1. Neuropharmacology 95:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.04.006 pmid:25892506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Calabresi P, Maj R, Pisani A, Mercuri NB, Bernardi G (1992) Long-term synaptic depression in the striatum: physiological and pharmacological characterization. J Neurosci 12:4224–4233. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04224.1992 pmid:1359031
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Calabresi P, Gubellini P, Centonze D, Picconi B, Bernardi G, Chergui K, Svenningsson P, Fienberg AA, Greengard P (2000) Dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein 32 kDa controls both striatal long-term depression and long-term potentiation, opposing forms of synaptic plasticity. J Neurosci 20:8443–8451. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-22-08443.2000 pmid:11069952
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Calipari ES, Juarez B, Morel C, Walker DM, Cahill ME, Ribeiro E, Roman-Ortiz C, Ramakrishnan C, Deisseroth K, Han MH, Nestler EJ (2017) Dopaminergic dynamics underlying sex-specific cocaine reward. Nat Commun 8:13877. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13877 pmid:28072417
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Carlson SC, Allen AM, Allen SS, Al’Absi M (2017) Differences in mood and cortisol by menstrual phase during acute smoking abstinence: a within-subject comparison. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 25:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000142 pmid:29048182
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    Castner SA, Xiao L, Becker JB (1993) Sex differences in striatal dopamine: in vivo microdialysis and behavioral studies. Brain Res 610:127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(93)91225-h pmid:8518920
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Cerovic M, D’Isa R, Tonini R, Brambilla R (2013) Molecular and cellular mechanisms of dopamine-mediated behavioral plasticity in the striatum. Neurobiol Learn Mem 105:63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.06.013 pmid:23827407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Cerovic M, Bagetta V, Pendolino V, Ghiglieri V, Fasano S, Morella I, Hardingham N, Heuer A, Papale A, Marchisella F, Giampà C, Calabresi P, Picconi B, Brambilla R (2015) Derangement of ras-guanine nucleotide-releasing factor 1 (Ras-GRF1) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) dependent striatal plasticity in L-DOPA-Induced dyskinesia. Biol Psychiatry 77:106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.04.002 pmid:24844602
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Choe ES, Wang JQ (2001) Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor activation increases phosphorylation of cAMP response element-binding protein, Elk-1, and extracellular signal-regulated kinases in rat dorsal striatum. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 94:75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-328x(01)00217-0 pmid:11597767
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    Corbit LH, Nie H, Janak PH (2012) Habitual alcohol seeking: time course and the contribution of subregions of the dorsal striatum. Biol Psychiatry 72:389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.02.024 pmid:22440617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Cui SZ, Wang SJ, Li J, Xie GQ, Zhou R, Chen L, Yuan XR (2011) Alteration of synaptic plasticity in rat dorsal striatum induced by chronic ethanol intake and withdrawal via ERK pathway. Acta Pharmacol Sin 32:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2010.199 pmid:21293469
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Daniel JM, Lee CD (2004) Estrogen replacement in ovariectomized rats affects strategy selection in the Morris water maze. Neurobiol Learn Mem 82:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.001 pmid:15341799
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Davis DM, Jacobson TK, Aliakbari S, Mizumori SJY (2005) Differential effects of estrogen on hippocampal- and striatal-dependent learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 84:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2005.06.004 pmid:16054404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Evans NJ, Bayliss AL, Reale V, Evans PD (2016) Characterisation of signalling by the endogenous GPER1 (GPR30) receptor in an embryonic mouse hippocampal cell line (mHippoE-18). PLoS One 11:e0152138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152138 pmid:26998610
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Fernández-Ruiz JJ, Amor JC, Ramos JA (1989) Time-dependent effects of estradiol and progesterone on the number of striatal dopaminergic D2-receptors. Brain Res 476:388–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(89)91266-3 pmid:2522808
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Fester L, Prange-Kiel J, Zhou L, Blittersdorf BV, Böhm J, Jarry H, Schumacher M, Rune GM (2012) Estrogen-regulated synaptogenesis in the hippocampus: sexual dimorphism in vivo but not in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 131:24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.11.010 pmid:22138012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Filardo EJ, Thomas P (2012) Minireview: G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-1, GPER-1: its mechanism of action and role in female reproductive cancer, renal and vascular physiology. Endocrinology 153:2953–2962. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1061 pmid:22495674
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Flores RJ, Pipkin JA, Uribe KP, Perez A, O’Dell LE (2016) Estradiol promotes the rewarding effects of nicotine in female rats. Behav Brain Res 307:258–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.004 pmid:27059334
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Foy MR, Xu J, Xie X, Brinton RD, Thompson RF, Berger TW (1999) 17β-estradiol enhances NMDA receptor-mediated EPSPs and long-term potentiation. J Neurophysiol 81:925–929. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.2.925 pmid:10036289
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Franklin TR, Jagannathan K, Wetherill RR, Johnson B, Kelly S, Langguth J, Mumma J, Childress AR (2015) Influence of menstrual cycle phase on neural and craving responses to appetitive smoking cues in naturally cycling females. Nicotine Tob Res 17:390–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu183 pmid:25762748
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Galea LAM, Wide JK, Paine TA, Holmes MM, Ormerod BK, Floresco SB (2001) High levels of estradiol disrupt conditioned place preference learning, stimulus response learning and reference memory but have limited effects on working memory. Behav Brain Res 126:115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00255-8 pmid:11704257
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    Gerdeman GL, Ronesi J, Lovinger DM (2002) Postsynaptic endocannabinoid release is critical to long-term depression in the striatum. Nat Neurosci 5:446–451. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn832 pmid:11976704
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Grassi S, Tozzi A, Costa C, Tantucci M, Colcelli E, Scarduzio M, Calabresi P, Pettorossi VE (2011) Neural 17β-estradiol facilitates long-term potentiation in the hippocampal CA1 region. Neuroscience 192:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.078 pmid:21749911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Gremel CM, Costa RM (2013) Orbitofrontal and striatal circuits dynamically encode the shift between goal-directed and habitual actions. Nat Commun 4:2264. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3264 pmid:23921250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Grove-Strawser D, Boulware MI, Mermelstein PG (2010) Membrane estrogen receptors activate the metabotropic glutamate receptors mGluR5 and mGluR3 to bidirectionally regulate CREB phosphorylation in female rat striatal neurons. Neuroscience 170:1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.012 pmid:20709161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Gubellini P, Centonze D, Tropepi D, Bernardi G, Calabresi P (2004) Induction of corticostriatal LTP by 3-nitropropionic acid requires the activation of mGluR1/PKC pathway. Neuropharmacology 46:761–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2003.11.021 pmid:15033336
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Hasegawa Y, Hojo Y, Kojima H, Ikeda M, Hotta K, Sato R, Ooishi Y, Yoshiya M, Chung BC, Yamazaki T, Kawato S (2015) Estradiol rapidly modulates synaptic plasticity of hippocampal neurons: involvement of kinase networks. Brain Res 1621:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.056 pmid:25595055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Hawes SL, Gillani F, Evans RC, Benkert EA, Blackwell KT (2013) Sensitivity to theta-burst timing permits LTP in dorsal striatal adult brain slice. J Neurophysiol 110:2027–2036. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00115.2013 pmid:23926032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Hawes SL, Evans RC, Unruh BA, Benkert EE, Gillani F, Dumas XC, Blackwell XKT (2015) Multimodal plasticity in dorsal striatum while learning a lateralized navigation task. J Neurosci 35:10535–10549. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4415-14.2015 pmid:26203148
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Hayaki J, Holzhauer CG, Epstein EE, Cook S, Gaba A, Lorenzo AC, McCrady BS (2020) Menstrual cycle phase, alcohol consumption, alcohol cravings, and mood among women in outpatient treatment for alcohol use disorder. Psychol Addict Behav 34:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000576 pmid:32250129
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    Houslay MD, Adams DR (2003) PDE4 cAMP phosphodiesterases: modular enzymes that orchestrate signalling cross-talk, desensitization and compartmentalization. Biochem J 370:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20021698 pmid:12444918
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Hu M, Becker JB (2008) Acquisition of cocaine self-administration in ovariectomized female rats: effect of estradiol dose or chronic estradiol administration. Drug Alcohol Depend 94:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.005 pmid:18054446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Hu M, Watson CJ, Kennedy RT, Becker JB (2006) Estradiol attenuates the K+-induced increase in extracellular GABA in rat striatum. Synapse 59:122–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.20221 pmid:16320305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Hussain D, Cossette MP, Brake WG (2016) High oestradiol replacement reverses response memory bias in ovariectomised female rats regardless of dopamine levels in the dorsal striatum. J Neuroendocrinol. Advance online publication. Retrieved February 29, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12375.
  50. ↵
    Inagaki T, Gautreaux C, Luine V (2010) Acute estrogen treatment facilitates recognition memory consolidation and alters monoamine levels in memory-related brain areas. Horm Behav 58:415–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.05.013 pmid:20553724
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Inagaki T, Frankfurt M, Luine V (2012) Estrogen-induced memory enhancements are blocked by acute bisphenol A in adult female rats: role of dendritic spines. Endocrinology 153:3357–3367. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1121 pmid:22569790
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Jackson LR, Robinson TE, Becker JB (2006) Sex differences and hormonal influences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 31:129–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300778 pmid:15920500
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Jacome LF, Barateli K, Buitrago D, Lema F, Frankfurt M, Luine VN (2016) Gonadal hormones rapidly enhance spatial memory and increase hippocampal spine density in male rats. Endocrinology 157:1357–1362. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1959 pmid:26844375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Jaric I, Rocks D, Greally JM, Suzuki M, Kundakovic M (2019) Chromatin organization in the female mouse brain fluctuates across the oestrous cycle. Nat Commun 10:2851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10704-0 pmid:31253786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Kato A, Hojo Y, Higo S, Komatsuzaki Y, Murakami G, Yoshino H, Uebayashi M, Kawato S (2013) Female hippocampal estrogens have a significant correlation with cyclic fluctuation of hippocampal spines. Front Neural Circuits 7:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2013.00149 pmid:24151456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Kemp JM, Powell TPS (1971) The structure of the caudate nucleus of the cat: light and electron microscopy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 262:383–401. pmid:4107495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Kerr JND, Wickens JR (2001) Dopamine D-1/D-5 receptor activation is required for long-term potentiation in the rat neostriatum in vitro. J Neurophysiol 85:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.85.1.117 pmid:11152712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Kim BH, Hawes SL, Gillani F, Wallace LJ, Blackwell KT (2013) Signaling pathways involved in striatal synaptic plasticity are sensitive to temporal pattern and exhibit spatial specificity. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1002953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002953 pmid:23516346
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Korol DL, Kolo LL (2002) Estrogen-induced changes in place and response learning in young adult female rats. Behav Neurosci 116:411–420. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7044.116.3.411 pmid:12049322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    Korol DL, Pisani SL (2015) Estrogens and cognition: friends or foes? An evaluation of the opposing effects of estrogens on learning and memory. Horm Behav 74:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.06.017 pmid:26149525
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    Korol DL, Malin EL, Borden KA, Busby RA, Couper-Leo J (2004) Shifts in preferred learning strategy across the estrous cycle in female rats. Horm Behav 45:330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.01.005 pmid:15109907
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Kövesdi E, Udvarácz I, Kecskés A, Szőcs S, Farkas S, Faludi P, Jánosi TZ, Ábrahám IM, Kovács G (2023) 17β-estradiol does not have a direct effect on the function of striatal cholinergic interneurons in adult mice in vitro. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:993552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.993552 pmid:36686456
    OpenUrlPubMed
  63. ↵
    Kreitzer AC, Malenka RC (2005) Dopamine modulation of state-dependent endocannabinoid release and long-term depression in the striatum. J Neurosci 25:10537–10545. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2959-05.2005 pmid:16280591
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Kreitzer AC, Malenka RC (2008) Striatal plasticity and basal ganglia circuit function. Neuron 60:543–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.005 pmid:19038213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Krentzel AA, Barrett LR, Meitzen J (2019) Estradiol rapidly modulates excitatory synapse properties in a sex- and region-specific manner in rat nucleus accumbens core and caudate-putamen. J Neurophysiol 122:1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00264.2019 pmid:31314648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    Kubo K, Gorski RA, Kawakami M (1975) Effects of estrogen on neuronal excitability in the hippocampal-septal-hypothalamic system. Neuroendocrinology 18:176–191. https://doi.org/10.1159/000122397 pmid:1172608
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Kucerova J, Vrskova D, Sulcova A (2009) Impact of repeated methamphetamine pretreatment on intravenous self-administration of the drug in males and estrogenized or non-estrogenized ovariectomized female rats. Neuroendocrinol Lett 30:663–670. pmid:20035259
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    Kumar A, Bean LA, Rani A, Jackson T, Foster TC (2015) Contribution of estrogen receptor subtypes, ERα, ERβ, and GPER1 in rapid estradiol-mediated enhancement of hippocampal synaptic transmission in mice. Hippocampus 25:1556–1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22475 pmid:25980457
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Kupferschmidt DA, Lovinger DM (2015) Inhibition of presynaptic calcium transients in cortical inputs to the dorsolateral striatum by metabotropic GABA(B) and mGlu2/3 receptors. J Physiol 593:2295–2310. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP270045 pmid:25781000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Küppers E, Beyer C (1998) Expression of aromatase in the embryonic and postnatal mouse striatum. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 63:184–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00279-4 pmid:9838103
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    Küppers E, Beyer C (1999) Expression of estrogen receptor-α and β mRNA in the developing and adult mouse striatum. Neurosci Lett 276:95–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00815-0 pmid:10624800
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Larson EB, Anker JJ, Gliddon LA, Fons KS, Carroll ME (2007) Effects of estrogen and progesterone on the escalation of cocaine self-administration in female rats during extended access. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.5.461 pmid:17924780
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Lee AS, Duman RS, Pittenger C (2008) A double dissociation revealing bidirectional competition between striatum and hippocampus during learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:17163–17168. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807749105 pmid:18955704
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    Lim J, Pahlke G, Conti M (1999) Activation of the cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D3 by phosphorylation: identification and function of an inhibitory domain. J Biol Chem 274:19677–19685. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.28.19677 pmid:10391907
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    Lipton DM, Gonzales BJ, Citri A (2019) Dorsal striatal circuits for habits, compulsions and addictions. Front Syst Neurosci 13:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00028 pmid:31379523
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    Lovinger DM (2010) Neurotransmitter roles in synaptic modulation, plasticity and learning in the dorsal striatum. Neuropharmacology 58:951–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2010.01.008 pmid:20096294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    Lovinger DM, Tyler E, Fidler S, Merritt A (1993) Properties of a presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptor in rat neostriatal slices. J Neurophysiol 69:1236–1244. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1236 pmid:8388042
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    Lu Y, Sareddy GR, Wang J, Wang R, Li Y, Dong Y, Zhang Q, Liu J, O’Connor JC, Xu J, Vadlamudi RK, Brann DW (2019) Neuron-derived estrogen regulates synaptic plasticity and memory. J Neurosci 39:2792–2809. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1970-18.2019 pmid:30728170
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    Luine V, Serrano P, Frankfurt M (2018) Rapid effects on memory consolidation and spine morphology by estradiol in female and male rodents. Horm Behav 104:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.04.007 pmid:29669258
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    Lüscher C, Malenka RC (2012) NMDA receptor-dependent long-term potentiation and long-term depression (LTP/LTD). Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4:a005710. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005710
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    Lynch WJ, Carroll ME (1999) Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 144:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130050979 pmid:10379627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    Malenka RC (2003) Synaptic plasticity and AMPA receptor trafficking. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1003:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1300.001 pmid:14684431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    Malinow R, Malenka RC (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu Rev Neurosci 25:103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142758 pmid:12052905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    Malvaez M (2020) Neural substrates of habit. J Neurosci Res 98:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24552 pmid:31693205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Mao L, Yang L, Tang Q, Samdani S, Zhang G, Wang JQ (2005) The scaffold protein Homer1b/c links metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase cascades in neurons. J Neurosci 25:2741–2752. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4360-04.2005 pmid:15758184
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    Meitzen J, Meisel RL, Mermelstein PG (2018) Sex differences and the effects of estradiol on striatal function. Curr Opin Behav Sci 23:42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.03.007 pmid:30221186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    Mermelstein PG, Becker JB, Surmeier DJ (1996) Estradiol reduces calcium currents in rat neostriatal neurons via a membrane receptor. J Neurosci 16:595–604. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-02-00595.1996 pmid:8551343
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    Micevych P, Christensen A (2012) Membrane-initiated estradiol actions mediate structural plasticity and reproduction. Front Neuroendocrinol 33:331–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2012.07.003 pmid:22828999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    Morissette M, Di Paolo T (1993) Sex and estrous cycle variations of rat striatal dopamine uptake sites. Neuroendocrinology 58:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1159/000126507 pmid:8264850
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    Moussa R, Poucet B, Amalric M, Sargolini F (2011) Contributions of dorsal striatal subregions to spatial alternation behavior. Learn Mem 18:444–451. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.2123811 pmid:21685151
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    Murray JE, Belin D, Everitt BJ (2012) Double dissociation of the dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatal control over the acquisition and performance of cocaine seeking. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:2456–2466. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.104 pmid:22739470
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    Neese SL, Korol DL, Katzenellenbogen JA, Schantz SL (2010) Impact of estrogen receptor alpha and beta agonists on delayed alternation in middle-aged rats. Horm Behav 58:878–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.08.017 pmid:20816967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    Packard MG, McGaugh JL (1996) Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1006/nlme.1996.0007 pmid:8673408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    Packard MG, Hirsh R, White NM (1989) Differential effects of fornix and caudate nucleus lesions on two radial maze tasks: evidence for multiple memory systems. J Neurosci 9:1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-05-01465.1989 pmid:2723738
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    Paris JJ, Frye CA (2008) Estrous cycle, pregnancy, and parity enhance performance of rats in object recognition or object placement tasks. Reproduction 136:105–115. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0512 pmid:18390689
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. ↵
    Partridge JG, Tang KC, Lovinger DM (2000) Regional and postnatal heterogeneity of activity-dependent long-term changes in synaptic efficacy in the dorsal striatum. J Neurophysiol 84:1422–1429. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1422 pmid:10980015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    Phan A, Gabor CS, Favaro KJ, Kaschack S, Armstrong JN, MacLusky NJ, Choleris E (2012) Low doses of 17β-estradiol rapidly improve learning and increase hippocampal dendritic spines. Neuropsychopharmacology 37:2299–2309. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2012.82 pmid:22669167
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    Phan A, Suschkov S, Molinaro L, Reynolds K, Lymer JM, Bailey CDC, Kow L-M, Maclusky NJ, Pfaff DW, Choleris E (2015) Rapid increases in immature synapses parallel estrogen-induced hippocampal learning enhancements. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:16018–16023. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522150112 pmid:26655342
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  99. ↵
    Piazza NJ, Vrbka JL, Yeager RD (1989) Telescoping of alcoholism in women alcoholics. Int J Addict 24:19–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088909047272 pmid:2759762
    OpenUrlPubMed
  100. ↵
    Pisani SL, Neese SL, Katzenellenbogen JA, Schantz SL, Korol DL (2016) Estrogen receptor-selective agonists modulate learning in female rats in a dose- and task-specific manner. Endocrinology 157:292–303. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2015-1616 pmid:26465198
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    Pleil KE, Glenn MJ, Williams CL (2011) Estradiol alters Fos-immunoreactivity in the hippocampus and dorsal striatum during place and response learning in middle-aged but not young adult female rats. Endocrinology 152:946–956. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0715 pmid:21285311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    Proaño SB, Morris HJ, Kunz LM, Dorris DM, Meitzen J (2018) Estrous cycle-induced sex differences in medium spiny neuron excitatory synaptic transmission and intrinsic excitability in adult rat nucleus accumbens core. J Neurophysiol 120:1356–1373. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00263.2018 pmid:29947588
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    Proaño SB, Krentzel AA, Meitzen J (2020) Differential and synergistic roles of 17β-estradiol and progesterone in modulating adult female rat nucleus accumbens core medium spiny neuron electrophysiology. J Neurophysiol 123:2390–2405. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00157.2020 pmid:32401164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    Quigley JA, Becker JB (2021) Activation of G-protein coupled estradiol receptor 1 in the dorsolateral striatum attenuates preference for cocaine and saccharin in male but not female rats. Horm Behav 130:104949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2021.104949 pmid:33609527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    Quigley JA, Logsdon MK, Turner CA, Gonzalez IL, Leonardo B, Becker JB (2021) Sex differences in vulnerability to addiction. Neuropharmacology 187:108491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108491 pmid:33567305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    Quinlan MG, Hussain D, Brake WG (2008) Use of cognitive strategies in rats: the role of estradiol and its interaction with dopamine. Horm Behav 53:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.015 pmid:17976601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    Quinlan MG, Almey A, Caissie M, LaChappelle I, Radiotis G, Brake WG (2013) Estradiol and striatal dopamine receptor antagonism influence memory system bias in the female rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem 106:221–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.08.018 pmid:24036396
    OpenUrlPubMed
  108. ↵
    Reynolds JNJ, Wickens JR (2002) Dopamine-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal synapses. Neural Netw 15:507–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0893-6080(02)00045-x pmid:12371508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  109. ↵
    Reynolds JNJ, Hyland BI, Wickens JR (2001) A cellular mechanism of reward-related learning. Nature 413:67–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/35092560 pmid:11544526
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    Roy EJ, Buyer DR, Licari VA (1990) Estradiol in the striatum: effects on behavior and dopamine receptors but no evidence for membrane steroid receptors. Brain Res Bull 25:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-9230(90)90064-7 pmid:2224537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    Scharfman HE, Mercurio TC, Goodman JH, Wilson MA, Maclusky NJ (2003) Hippocampal excitability increases during the estrous cycle in the rat: a potential role for brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Neurosci 23:11641–11652. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-37-11641.2003 pmid:14684866
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  112. ↵
    Schultz KN, von Esenwein SA, Hu M, Bennett AL, Kennedy RT, Musatov S, Toran-Allerand CD, Kaplitt MG, Young LJ, Becker JB (2009) Viral vector-mediated overexpression of estrogen receptor-α in striatum enhances the estradiol-induced motor activity in female rats and estradiol-modulated GABA release. J Neurosci 29:1897–1903. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4647-08.2009 pmid:19211896
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    Shams WM, Sanio C, Quinlan MG, Brake WG (2016) 17β-Estradiol infusions into the dorsal striatum rapidly increase dorsal striatal dopamine release in vivo. Neuroscience 330:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.05.049 pmid:27256507
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    Shan Q, Ge M, Christie MJ, Balleine BW (2014) The acquisition of goal-directed actions generates opposing plasticity in direct and indirect pathways in dorsomedial striatum. J Neurosci 34:9196–9201. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0313-14.2014 pmid:25009253
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  115. ↵
    Shan Q, Christie MJ, Balleine BW (2015) Plasticity in striatopallidal projection neurons mediates the acquisition of habitual actions. Eur J Neurosci 42:2097–2104. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.12971 pmid:26054036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    Sharp JL, Ethridge SB, Ballard SL, Potter KM, Schmidt KT, Smith MA (2021) The effects of chronic estradiol treatment on opioid self-administration in intact female rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 225:108816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108816 pmid:34171824
    OpenUrlPubMed
  117. ↵
    Smith CC, McMahon LL (2006) Estradiol-induced increase in the magnitude of long-term potentiation is prevented by blocking NR2B-containing receptors. J Neurosci 26:8517–8522. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5279-05.2006 pmid:16914677
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  118. ↵
    Song Z, Yang H, Peckham EM, Becker JB (2019) Estradiol-induced potentiation of dopamine release in dorsal striatum following amphetamine administration requires estradiol receptors and mGlu5. eNeuro 6:ENEURO.0446-18.2019. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0446-18.2019
    OpenUrl
  119. ↵
    Spencer JP, Murphy KPSJ (2002) Activation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase is required for long-term enhancement at corticostriatal synapses in rats. Neurosci Lett 329:217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00659-6 pmid:12165416
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. ↵
    Taxier LR, Gross KS, Frick KM (2020) Oestradiol as a neuromodulator of learning and memory. Nat Rev Neurosci 21:535–550. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0362-7 pmid:32879508
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  121. ↵
    Thomas P, Alyea R, Pang Y, Peyton C, Dong J, Berg H (2010) Conserved estrogen binding and signaling functions of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1, GPER, in mammals and fish. Steroids 75:595–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2009.11.005 pmid:19931550
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  122. ↵
    Tozzi A, de Iure A, Tantucci M, Durante V, Quiroga-Varela A, Giampà C, Di Mauro M, Mazzocchetti P, Costa C, Di Filippo M, Grassi S, Pettorossi VE, Calabresi P (2015) Endogenous 17β-estradiol is required for activity-dependent long-term potentiation in the striatum: interaction with the dopaminergic system. Front Cell Neurosci 9:192–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00192 pmid:26074768
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  123. ↵
    Ursic M, Bavdek SV, Zabavnik J (2003) The number of cells expressing dopamine D2 receptor mRNA in rat brain caudate putamen is higher in oestrus. J Anat 202:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-7580.2003.00180.x pmid:12739622
    OpenUrlPubMed
  124. ↵
    Walf AA, Rhodes ME, Frye CA (2006) Ovarian steroids enhance object recognition in naturally cycling and ovariectomized, hormone-primed rats. Neurobiol Learn Mem 86:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2006.01.004 pmid:16529958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    Wang Q, Yin P, Yu B, Zhao Z, Richter-Levin G, Yu L, Cao X (2017) Down-regulation of dorsal striatal αCaMKII causes striatum-related cognitive and synaptic disorders. Exp Neurol 298:112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.09.004 pmid:28890075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    Wang VC, Sable HJK, Ju YH, Allred CD, Helferich WG, Korol DL, Schantz SL (2008) Effects of chronic estradiol treatment on delayed spatial alternation and differential reinforcement of low rates of responding. Behav Neurosci 122:794–804. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012513 pmid:18729633
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  127. ↵
    Wang VC, Neese SL, Korol DL, Schantz SL (2009) Chronic estradiol replacement impairs performance on an operant delayed spatial alternation task in young, middle-aged, and old rats. Horm Behav 56:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.07.005 pmid:19631212
    OpenUrlPubMed
  128. ↵
    Wang W, Le AA, Hou B, Lauterborn JC, Cox CD, Levin ER, Lynch G, Gall CM (2018) Memory-related synaptic plasticity is sexually dimorphic in rodent hippocampus. J Neurosci 38:7935–7951. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0801-18.2018 pmid:30209204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  129. ↵
    Wang Z, Kai L, Day M, Ronesi J, Yin HH, Ding J, Tkatch T, Lovinger DM, Surmeier DJ (2006) Dopaminergic control of corticostriatal long-term synaptic depression in medium spiny neurons is mediated by cholinergic interneurons. Neuron 50:443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.010 pmid:16675398
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. ↵
    Warren JG, Goodwin L, Gage SH, Rose AK (2021) The effects of menstrual cycle stage and hormonal contraception on alcohol consumption and craving: a pilot investigation. Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol 5:100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpnec.2020.100022 pmid:35754447
    OpenUrlPubMed
  131. ↵
    Warren SG, Humphreys AG, Juraska JM, Greenough WT (1995) LTP varies across the estrous cycle: enhanced synaptic plasticity in proestrus rats. Brain Res 703:26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(95)01059-9 pmid:8719612
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    Willett JA, Cao J, Johnson A, Patel OH, Dorris DM, Meitzen J (2020) The estrous cycle modulates rat caudate–putamen medium spiny neuron physiology. Eur J Neurosci 52:2737–2755. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.14506 pmid:31278786
    OpenUrlPubMed
  133. ↵
    Woolley CS, McEwen BS (1992) Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci 12:2549–2554. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-07-02549.1992 pmid:1613547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  134. ↵
    Xiao L, Becker JB (1994) Quantitative microdialysis determination of extracellular striatal dopamine concentration in male and female rats: effects of estrous cycle and gonadectomy. Neurosci Lett 180:155–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(94)90510-x pmid:7700570
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    Xie GQ, Wang SJ, Li J, Cui SZ, Zhou R, Chen L, Yuan XR (2009) Ethanol attenuates the HFS-induced, ERK-mediated LTP in a dose-dependent manner in rat striatum. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 33:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00818.x pmid:18945217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    Yagi S, Drewczynski D, Wainwright SR, Barha CK, Hershorn O, Galea LAM (2017) Sex and estrous cycle differences in immediate early gene activation in the hippocampus and the dorsal striatum after the cue competition task. Horm Behav 87:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.019 pmid:27984032
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    Yang L, Mao L, Tang Q, Samdani S, Liu Z, Wang JQ (2004) A novel Ca2+-independent signaling pathway to extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase by coactivation of NMDA receptors and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 in neurons. J Neurosci 24:10846–10857. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2496-04.2004 pmid:15574735
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  138. ↵
    Yin HH, Knowlton BJ (2006) The role of the basal ganglia in habit formation. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:464–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1919 pmid:16715055
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. ↵
    Yin HH, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW (2005a) Blockade of NMDA receptors in the dorsomedial striatum prevents action-outcome learning in instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 22:505–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04219.x pmid:16045503
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  140. ↵
    Yin HH, Ostlund SB, Knowlton BJ, Balleine BW (2005b) The role of the dorsomedial striatum in instrumental conditioning. Eur J Neurosci 22:513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04218.x pmid:16045504
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. ↵
    Yin HH, Mulcare SP, Hilário MRF, Clouse E, Holloway T, Davis MI, Hansson AC, Lovinger DM, Costa RM (2009) Dynamic reorganization of striatal circuits during the acquisition and consolidation of a skill. Nat Neurosci 12:333–341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2261 pmid:19198605
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    Yu X, Stallone JN, Heaps CL, Han G (2018) The activation of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor induces relaxation via cAMP as well as potentiates contraction via EGFR transactivation in porcine coronary arteries. PLoS One 13:e0191418. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191418 pmid:29360846
    OpenUrlPubMed
  143. ↵
    Zurkovsky L, Brown SL, Boyd SE, Fell JA, Korol DL (2007) Estrogen modulates learning in female rats by acting directly at distinct memory systems. Neuroscience 144:26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.09.002 pmid:17052857
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Tod E Kippin, University of California Berkeley

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Devin Mueller.

I have received two independent reviews of our manuscript which both expressed a very high level of enthusiasm for the findings of your study in general, particularly regarding the novelty of investigating the impact of sex and hormones on LTD. However, both expressed some concerns that require moderate revision and clarifications be made before a final decision can be made. As such, I am recommending the manuscript be revised and re-reviewed.

Below are specific comments from the reviewer that should be carefully addressed prior to submitting a revised manuscript.

Reviewer 1

In the present study, the authors examine the effects of estradiol and its receptors on theta-burst stimulation-induced long-term potentiation (LTP) in dorsomedial striatal neurons. Extracellular field recordings in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) from brain slices derived from intact male and female mice were performed. Whereas theta-burst stimulation induced LTP in the DMS of male mice, LTP was only observed in the DMS of female mice in diestrus. When female mice were sacrificed during estrus, LTP was not observed. Inhibiting the estradiol receptors ERa and GPER rescued LTP in in estrus mice whereas activating ERa and GPER impaired LTP in diestrus mice. These data suggest that estradiol inhibits LTP in the DMS of females through activation of ERa and GPER receptors.

These data extend our understanding of the effects of estradiol in the DMS, suggesting that high levels of estradiol impair learning and may promote habit formation. The study is straightforward and expands our understanding of cellular mechanisms of estradiol on neuronal plasticity within the DMS. However, I have some concerns with the study in its present form.

1. Although the authors have demonstrated that estradiol inhibits LTP, the mechanisms of action are unclear. Both ERa and GPER receptors are targeted suggesting these receptors mediate the inhibition of LTP. How they do so, however, is not examined directly and limits our understanding. Furthermore, there is no clear assay to assess the relevance of these findings (such as a behavioral readout).

2. In Figure 4, GPER inhibition with G15 not only rescues LTP but does so in a manner similar to males in Figure 3 rather than like diestrus females. Does GPER activation in males impair LTP in the DMS? Examining the effects of ER agonists and antagonist in the DMS of males would be insightful.

3. Minor: In the statistical table, the first manuscript reference should be “a”.

Reviewer 2

This is an interesting study that outlines how estradiol affects synaptic plasticity in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS). The authors show that female mice in diestrus stage exhibited LTP similar to male mice; however, female mice in estrus did not exhibit LTP at all. Then using pharmacological approaches with estrogen receptor agonists and antagonists they found that ERα or GPER likely play a critical role in this process as antagonism of both receptors can rescue LTP in estrus females, and agonism can induce LTP in diestrus females. Overall this is a simple, but interesting manuscript that is important for the field. There were a few relatively minor comments that should be addressed:

How are the antagonists working in slice. Is there estradiol tone?

How were the doses chosen for the pharmacology studies? The doses are listed but no information on how they were chosen is provided.

“Estradiol, the predominant form of the sex hormone estrogen” is stated in the first sentence of the abstract - Estrogen is not a hormone, it is a class of hormones (estrone, E1; estradiol, E2; and estriol, E3). The authors should go through out and make sure that their language is appropriate throughout.

Author Response

Reviewer #1:

These data extend our understanding of the effects of estradiol in the DMS, suggesting that high levels of estradiol impair learning and may promote habit formation. The study is straightforward and expands our understanding of cellular mechanisms of estradiol on neuronal plasticity within the DMS. However, I have some concerns with the study in its present form.

1. Although the authors have demonstrated that estradiol inhibits LTP, the mechanisms of action are unclear. Both ERa and GPER receptors are targeted suggesting these receptors mediate the inhibition of LTP. How they do so, however, is not examined directly and limits our understanding. Furthermore, there is no clear assay to assess the relevance of these findings (such as a behavioral readout).

Response: Thank you for the suggestion, as it encouraged us to think beyond the surface of what could be happening with these receptors. We have completely rewritten most of the

Discussion (lines 259, 277 to 278, and 300 to 357) to better explain the possible mechanisms through which the receptors could be inhibiting LTP. Testing which of the following mechanisms is actually responsible for our observed results is part of our future directions.

One possible mechanism is through reducing calcium influx through voltage-dependent calcium channels due to a reduction in excitability (Willett et al., 2019). This lower calcium would reduce the activation of calcium-dependent kinases critical for LTP. Alternatively, ERα coupling to mGluR may be its mechanism of action in inhibiting LTP (Grove-Strawser et al., 2010). Enhanced mGluR5 activation, together with lower calcium levels during estrus may enhance the downstream Gq signaling pathways involved in DAG conversion into the endocannabinoid 2-AG. Another scenario is that ERα acts through mGluR3 presynaptically, where its activation of Gi/o-coupled signaling reduces glutamate release into the DMS, and thus reduces the effectiveness of glutamatergic signaling that initiates LTP.

We also describe two hypotheses for GPER’s role in inhibiting LTP. The first is that LTP is inhibited (paradoxically) through the GPER Gs-coupled pathway. Higher basal levels of GPER activity during the high-estradiol periods of proestrus and estrus could result in a compensatory buildup of PDE4 activity, which could then reduce cAMP activity during the theta burst stimulation protocol. The other hypothesis is that GPER works to enhance the effect of active ERα, as the two ERs are known to co-localize in other tissues (Acramel and Jacquot, 2022) and may also do so in the dorsal striatum. The results in males - that the GPER agonist did not inhibit LTP - also are consistent with this hypothesis, under the prediction that the estradiol level in males is too low to activate enough ERα for the GPER enhancement to have an effect.

The behavioral assay is an excellent suggestion and would be an important study to confirm the relevance of our findings. It would be difficult to study the estrous cycle in a DMS-based learning task because the training protocols that measure these types of learning take multiple days - longer than the length of an estrous cycle phase. Alternatively, ovariectomized rats with or without estradiol replacement could be used to measure ER action. This would still be a monumental undertaking, due to the need to demonstrate the role of estradiol specifically in the striatum. In other words, we would need to give infusion of ER agonists and antagonists directly into the striatum for the duration of the training protocol. Unfortunately, while this might demonstrate the role of estradiol in learning, it would not necessarily demonstrate how the interaction between estradiol receptors and LTP impact behavior. In fact, demonstrating the role of LTP in behavior is exceedingly difficult (Whitlock et al., 2006). In summary, though showing the behavioral relevance of estradiol inhibition of LTP would be a huge contribution to the field, such an experiment is beyond the scope of our current research. However, we have rewritten a paragraph in our Discussion (lines 358 to 392) that now gives a better overview of past behavioral experiments that test the effect of estradiol on dorsal striatal learning in rats.

2. In Figure 4, GPER inhibition with G15 not only rescues LTP but does so in a manner similar to males in Figure 3 rather than like diestrus females. Does GPER activation in males impair LTP in the DMS? Examining the effects of ER agonists and antagonist in the DMS of males would be insightful.

Response: We have conducted additional experiments that examine the effects of ERα and GPER agonists and antagonists on LTP in male DMS (Fig. 6; Results lines 217 to 245, lines 820 to 832). The results are quite interesting, and demonstrate that ERα activation inhibits LTP in males, which is consistent with our observations in diestrus females. Consistent with the observation that estradiol levels of males are lower than females, the ERα antagonist had no effect on LTP in males. In contrast to results in diestrus females, we found that GPER does not impair LTP in males, revealing a sex difference in GPER function. We hypothesize that GPER activation is facilitating ERα activity in females, and this interaction requires a minimal basal level of estradiol, which is lacking in males (Discussion lines 351 to 354).

Additionally, we were interested in the short-term depression seen in estrus females, as it was prevented by the GPER antagonist and it occurred in diestrus females under the G1 agonist. This short-term depression did not appear in males with the GPER agonist, reinforcing the conclusion that GPER has different effects in males and females.

3. Minor: In the statistical table, the first manuscript reference should be “a”.

Response: Fixed!

Reviewer #2:

This is an interesting study that outlines how estradiol affects synaptic plasticity in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS). The authors show that female mice in diestrus stage exhibited LTP similar to male mice; however, female mice in estrus did not exhibit LTP at all. Then using pharmacological approaches with estrogen receptor agonists and antagonists they found that ERα or GPER likely play a critical role in this process as antagonism of both receptors can rescue LTP in estrus females, and agonism can induce LTP in diestrus females.

Overall this is a simple, but interesting manuscript that is important for the field.

Response: We are glad that the reviewer appreciates the importance of our results.

There were a few relatively minor comments that should be addressed:

How are the antagonists working in slice. Is there estradiol tone?

Response: Based on studies in rats, there is estradiol tone in the dorsal striatum of both males and females, and the tone correlates with plasma levels of estradiol (Bixo et al., 1986; del Pino et al., 2017). Another source besides blood that supplies estradiol to the striatum is local conversion of testosterone into estradiol via aromatase. A study that used slice electrophysiology to test the effect of estradiol on long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dorsolateral striatum found that not only an estradiol receptor (ER) antagonist but also an aromatase inhibitor affects LTP (Tozzi et al., 2015). Thus, it would be expected that there is a basal level of ER activity occurring in slice, and that antagonists would disrupt this activity in estrus (lines 187 to 189).

How were the doses chosen for the pharmacology studies? The doses are listed but no information on how they were chosen is provided.

Response: We chose the drug doses based on what previous research in slice electrophysiology has used. The Methods section is now updated (lines 134 to 136) with an explanation of how the drug doses were chosen. Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

“Estradiol, the predominant form of the sex hormone estrogen” is stated in the first sentence of the abstract - Estrogen is not a hormone, it is a class of hormones (estrone, E1; estradiol, E2; and estriol, E3). The authors should go through out and make sure that their language is appropriate throughout.

Response: Thank you for this correction. The wording is now fixed (Abstract line 2 and Introduction line 31). We have carefully proof-read the entire manuscript to ensure that our language is accurate.

Back to top

In this issue

Email
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Respond to this article
Estradiol Receptors Inhibit Long-Term Potentiation in the Dorsomedial Striatum
Valerie J. Lewitus, Kim T. Blackwell
eNeuro 24 July 2023, 10 (8) ENEURO.0071-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0071-23.2023
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Subjects