Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Chronic Alcohol Drinking Drives Sex-Specific Differences in Affective Behavior and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity in CRF1:Cre:tdTomato Transgenic Rats

Sema G. Quadir, Gillian M. Arleth, Meredith G. Cone, Margaret W. High, Maria C. Ramage, Devin P. Effinger, Maria Echeveste Sanchez and Melissa A. Herman
eNeuro 6 July 2023, 10 (7) ENEURO.0055-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0055-23.2023
Sema G. Quadir
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sema G. Quadir
Gillian M. Arleth
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meredith G. Cone
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret W. High
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria C. Ramage
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devin P. Effinger
2Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Echeveste Sanchez
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melissa A. Herman
1Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
2Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In 2021, 131 million adult Americans reported drinking alcohol in the last month, despite the well-known consequences of alcohol consumption. While alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are associated with both mood and chronic pain disorders, the relationship between alcohol drinking and affective and nociceptive behaviors remains unclear. Corticotropin releasing factor receptor-1 (CRF1) has been implicated in alcohol drinking, affective states, and pain sensitivity, often in a sex-dependent manner. In order to probe the effects of alcohol drinking on activity of CRF1+ cells and to also test the hypothesis that alcohol drinking is associated with both basal and subsequent affective and nociceptive readouts, we put male and female CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats through a battery of behavioral tests before and after intermittent access to alcohol. Following baseline testing, rats began alcohol (or water) drinking. Females consumed more alcohol in the first week, but there was no effect of sex on overall alcohol intake. Following three to four weeks of drinking, behavioral tests were repeated. Alcohol drinking decreased mechanical sensitivity, but no other effects of alcohol drinking were observed between experimental groups. Individual alcohol intake correlated with affective behavior in both sexes but only correlated with thermal sensitivity in males. There were no main effects of alcohol drinking or sex on CRF1+ neuronal activity in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) but final session alcohol intake correlated with activity in CRF1+ neurons in the infralimbic (IL) subregion. Together, our results suggest complex interplay between affective state, alcohol drinking, and the role of prefrontal CRF1+ neurons in mediating these behaviors.

  • alcohol
  • anxiety
  • pain
  • corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1
  • prefrontal cortex
  • prelimbic
  • infralimbic

Significance Statement

Despite alcohol use being extremely comorbid with mood and pain disorders, there is still a limited understanding of the interaction and directionality between the them. To investigate this problem, rats were tested for affective behavior before and after being allowed to drink alcohol for six weeks. While baseline behavior did not predict subsequent intake, alcohol intake predicted subsequent affective behavior on an individual subject basis. These findings were accompanied by increased activity of the corticotropin releasing factor receptor-1 (CRF1) containing neurons in the infralimbic (IL) region of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Together, these findings reveal a new mechanism for understanding alcohol use.

Introduction

In 2021, 131 million adult Americans reported drinking alcohol (EtOH) in the last month, with almost 30 million adult Americans meeting the criteria for an alcohol use disorder (AUD; SAMHSA, 2022). While AUDs are clinically defined based on criteria such as inability to control drinking, tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), they always begin with alcohol use that transitions into an AUD. Through repeated cycles of alcohol (EtOH) use, negative affective states can emerge on drinking cessation (Koob and Le Moal, 2005). These states can promote the development of dependence as individuals drink to alleviate withdrawal symptoms such as increased anxiety and anhedonia (Martinotti et al., 2008; Howe et al., 2021). Conversely, anxiety also often precedes EtOH use and is linked to a more rapid development and progression of AUD in both humans (Sloan et al., 2003; Sartor et al., 2007; Kushner et al., 2011; Boschloo et al., 2013) and rodents (Spanagel et al., 1995; Hayton et al., 2012; Pelloux et al., 2015). Mood disorders and EtOH use often occur together (Schellekens et al., 2015; Anker and Kushner, 2019; McHugh and Weiss, 2019; SAMHSA, 2022); however, our understanding of this relationship remains incomplete as both are influenced by a variety of other factors including sex. For example, genetic models demonstrated that rats bred for high anxiety-phenotypes or congenital learned helplessness drink more EtOH than rats bred for low-anxiety or noncongenital learned helplessness phenotypes, but both differences are only present in females (Vengeliene et al., 2005; Izídio and Ramos, 2007). Other studies found that affective behavior in the elevated plus maze predicts EtOH intake in male, but not female, rats (McNamara and Ito, 2021). In humans, EtOH use is more prevalent among men (SAMHSA, 2022); however, recent trends indicate that the prevalence of EtOH use among women is increasing at a faster rate than in men (Slade et al., 2016; Grant et al., 2017; Grucza et al., 2018) and the sex-related differences are narrowing (A.M. White et al., 2015; A. White, 2020; Keyes et al., 2021). Additionally, mood disorders are more common in women (Salk et al., 2017; Franceschini and Fattore, 2021) and women are more likely to drink heavily in response to psychological distress compared with their male counterparts (Olenick and Chalmers, 1991; Choi and DiNitto, 2011). Together, these studies highlight a major gap in our understanding of alcohol use and AUDs: how sex influences affective behaviors that both precede and follow EtOH use.

Affective behavior and EtOH use not only overlap in incidence, but also share similar neurobiological underpinnings. More specifically, both involve the stress-related corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) system. While hypothalamic release of CRF results in activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, extrahypothalamic CRF acts as an important neuromodulator in the brain through activity at two G-protein-coupled receptors, CRF1 and CRF2. In humans, polymorphisms in the gene encoding CRF1 are associated binge drinking, EtOH intake, and intoxication as well as with AUDs (Treutlein et al., 2006; A.C. Chen et al., 2010). Polymorphisms in CRF1 are also associated with affective behaviors such as post-traumatic stress disorder, panic disorder, depression, suicidality, and loneliness (Bradley et al., 2008; Keck et al., 2008; Wasserman et al., 2009; Grabe et al., 2010; Kranzler et al., 2011; Chou et al., 2014; Weber et al., 2016).

In rodents, systemically administered CRF1 antagonists decrease negative affect, EtOH intake, EtOH-induced negative affect and EtOH-induced hyperalgesia (Valdez et al., 2002; Breese et al., 2005; Overstreet et al., 2005; Sparta et al., 2008; Lowery et al., 2010; H. Wang et al., 2011; Edwards et al., 2012). CRF1 is found extensively throughout the brain and has been studied in the context of both EtOH drinking and affective behaviors. However, most studies focus only on the classical stress regions, such the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (M.M. Huang et al., 2010; Faria et al., 2016; Rinker et al., 2017) and the amygdala (M.M. Huang et al., 2010; Koob, 2010; Kreifeldt et al., 2022; Rodriguez et al., 2022) despite CRF1 being abundantly expressed in cortical regions (Hubbard et al., 2011; Gozzi et al., 2013; Rieger et al., 2022). Indeed, alcohol preferring rats have increased CRF1 levels in the cingulate cortex, motor cortex, and somatosensory cortex (Hansson et al., 2006). CRF1 is also abundantly expressed in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC; Brufatto et al., 2021; Weera et al., 2022); however, there are limited studies examining the effects of chronic EtOH drinking on CRF1-containing neurons in the PFC. The PFC’s role in mediating affective behavior (Klein et al., 2010; van Harmelen et al., 2010; Myers-Schulz and Koenigs, 2012; Carlson et al., 2015; Murrough et al., 2016; Nie et al., 2018; Wohleb et al., 2018; Naylor et al., 2019; Hare and Duman, 2020; Price and Duman, 2020; Jacobs and Moghaddam, 2021; Papasideris et al., 2021; Y. Chen et al., 2022; Dang et al., 2022; Dong et al., 2022; Kenwood et al., 2022; Yu et al., 2022; Bouras et al., 2023; R. Wang et al., 2023), nociception (Perlaki et al., 2015; S. Huang et al., 2019, 2020; D. Kang et al., 2019a, 2021; Ong et al., 2019; Tu et al., 2019; Kummer et al., 2020; C. Wang et al., 2020; Jefferson et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2021; Malvestio et al., 2021; Mecca et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2022; Chang et al., 2022; Raisian et al., 2022; Ujcikova et al., 2022), and the effects of EtOH (Abernathy et al., 2010; Lu and Richardson, 2014; Tapocik et al., 2014; H. Zhang et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2015; Linsenbardt and Lapish, 2015; Faccidomo et al., 2016; Natividad et al., 2018; Hughes et al., 2019, 2020, 2021; Scarlata et al., 2019; Barbier et al., 2021; Fish and Joffe, 2022; Zhao et al., 2022; Y. Hu et al., 2023) has been studied extensively, making this a prime region to investigate the relationship between these behaviors.

The present study uses behavioral testing and voluntary EtOH drinking in a CRF1 transgenic rat line to investigate the interaction between EtOH drinking and affective behavior in male and female rats. This study also examines the impact of chronic EtOH drinking on activity in the prefrontal cortex overall and specific to the CRF1 population. We specifically tested the hypothesis that basal affective and nociceptive behavior would predict subsequent drinking and that increased EtOH intake would further drive affective and nociceptive readouts. A period of three to four weeks of drinking was chosen as other papers found this time was sufficient to induce affective and nociceptive behaviors in both rats (Knapp et al., 2011; Gomez et al., 2013; Sharma et al., 2015; Thakore et al., 2016; Junqueira-Ayres et al., 2017) and mice (van Rijn et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2016, 2017; S. Liu et al., 2018; Szumlinski et al., 2019; Nennig et al., 2020; Bloodgood et al., 2021; N. Wang et al., 2021). Additionally, we chose to use the CRF1:cre:tdTomato rat to investigate the effects of voluntary EtOH drinking on activity in specific CRF1-containing neuronal population. Using this transgenic line also allows us to lay the groundwork for future studies involving manipulations of specific CRF1-containing populations and the effect on EtOH intake. We hypothesized that chronic EtOH drinking would increase activity of CRF1-containing neurons in the PFC in a dose-dependent manner (i.e., increased EtOH intake correlating with increased activity).

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A total of 32 adult male and female (n = 16/sex) CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats (Weera et al., 2022; 8–11 weeks old, bred in-house) were housed in temperature and humidity-controlled rooms with 12/12 h light/dark cycle (7 A.M. lights on). Rats had ad libitum access to food and water unless otherwise stated. Rats were handled before behavioral testing intake began. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill animal care committee’s regulations.

Splash test

Rats were allowed to habituate in the behavioral testing room for 1 h before testing. Rats were sprayed once with 10% w/v sucrose solution (∼5-cm spray distance, ∼100 μl per spray) on the dorsal coat of the torso, placed into a Plexiglas/textured flooring behavioral testing chamber [50 cm (length) × 50 cm (width) × 38 cm (height)] and recorded for 10 min in red light conditions. Latency to groom and total time spent grooming were scored by an experimenter blind to experimental group using the Behavioral Observation Research Interactive Software (BORIS) program (Friard and Gamba, 2016). Latency to groom and time spent grooming were used as measures of affective behavior.(Isingrini et al., 2010; Rosa et al., 2014; Engel et al., 2016; Haj-Mirzaian et al., 2016; Sadeghi et al., 2016; C. Hu et al., 2017; Lieberknecht et al., 2017; Andalib et al., 2019; Sasibhushana et al., 2019; Bijani et al., 2022; Quadir et al., 2022) One subject was excluded from analysis because of equipment malfunction during testing.

Mechanical sensitivity testing (Von Frey)

Rats were brought into behavioral testing room 1 h before testing and were habituated for 15 min to a stainless-steel table (78 × 32 × 19.5 cm) with a perforated sheet containing staggered holes (0.28 cm diameter). Plastic filaments of increasing force (Bioseb EB2-VFF) were applied perpendicularly to hind paws until bending, and nocifensive responses defined as shaking, licking, or withdrawing the paw were recorded. Each paw was prodded three times/filament, beginning with the 2-g filament and increasing until the rat exhibited a nocifensive response during at least two trials. Withdrawal thresholds for each hind paw were then averaged for each animal to determine the paw withdrawal threshold.

Novelty suppressed feeding (NSF)

Rats were given 1 Froot Loop in the home-cage 48 h before testing to prevent neophobia. Twenty-four hours before testing, the food was removed from the cage. On test day, rats were habituated to behavioral testing room for 1 h before testing. During testing, rats were individually placed into a brightly lit (150 lux) behavioral testing chamber (50 × 76 × 40 cm) containing one Froot Loop on filter paper in the center. Latency to eat was recorded and used as a measure of affective behavior (David et al., 2009; Iijima et al., 2012; J. Liu et al., 2015; Brachman et al., 2016; Barbieri et al., 2021; Zhou et al., 2021). After feeding initiation (or after 10 min), rats were removed from the chamber and returned to the home-cage where post-test consumption of preweighed Froot loops was recorded for 10 min. Post-test consumption was used as a measure of appetite (Iijima et al., 2012; P. Zhang et al., 2018).

Thermal sensitivity testing (Hargreaves test)

Rats were assessed for thermal sensitivity using the Plantar Analgesia Meter (IITC). Rats were brought into the testing room 1 h before testing and habituated to the heated glass (temperature: 32°C) apparatus for 20 min. Infrared light (artificial intensity: 40) was focused onto each hindpaw and withdrawal latency was recorded. A maximum cutoff of 20 s was used to prevent tissue damage. Each hindpaw was tested twice. If the latencies differed by more than 1 s, then the paw was tested one additional time. Withdrawal latencies were averaged per paw then per animal.

Intermittent access to two-bottle choice (IA2BC)

After 4 d of acclimatization to drinking out of two water bottles, one bottle containing 20% EtOH and one bottle of water were placed on cages for 24 h. This occurred on alternating days (MWF) and bottles were introduced or removed at 10 A.M., 3 h after onset of the light cycle [zeitgeber time (ZT) 3]. Water drinking rats had their water bottles changed every 24 h (at the same time) to ensure comparable treatment. Bottle placement was alternated to eliminate side preference; 20% v/v EtOH was prepared by diluting 95% EtOH (Pharmco Products Inc) in tap water.

Behavioral testing following IA2BC

Behavioral testing began 24 h after EtOH bottles were removed and lasted 2–3 h. IA2BC resumed the following day. The order of testing was randomized at baseline. During postconsumption testing, pain tests occurred before affective testing to prolong the time between re-exposure to anxiogenic contexts. Finally, the NSF test was performed last as food deprivation is a known stressor (Genn et al., 2003; Nowland et al., 2011; Lenglos et al., 2013; Prvulovic et al., 2022) and could have confounded the other behavioral tests.

Immunohistochemistry

Twenty-four hours after the last alcohol presentation, rats were anesthetized with isoflurane and transcardially perfused using PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Brains were postfixed in 4% PFA at 4°C overnight and then transferred to 30% sucrose in PBS at 4°C until brains sank. Brains were serially sectioned at 40 μm and stored in cryoprotectant (30% sucrose, 30% ethylene glycol, 0.01% sodium azide in PBS) at 4°C.

For each animal, four to six sections containing the medial prefrontal cortex (ranging from 3.72 to 2.52 mm anterior of bregma based on Paxinos and Watson, 2007) were used. These 40-μm sections underwent PBS washes and were incubated in 50% methanol for 30 min. Slices were blocked in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min then 3% normal goat serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h (with PBS washes in-between). Slices were incubated at 4°C for 48 h with rabbit anti-cFos primary antibody (1:3000, Millipore Sigma ABE457) and mouse anti-RFP primary antibody (1:500, Invitrogen MA5-15257) in blocking solution. Slices were then washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in Tris-buffered saline (TNT) before 30 min incubation in TNB blocking buffer (PerkinElmer FP1012). Next, slices were incubated with goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (1:400, Abcam ab6721) and goat anti-mouse 555 (1:800, Invitrogen A2123) in TNB buffer for 2 h before TNT washes. Lastly, slices were incubated in tyramide-conjugated fluorescein (Akoya Biosciences, NEL741001KT, 1:50) for 10 min. Following TNT washes, slices were mounted and sealed with mounting medium (Vector Laboratories H1500). Slides were stored at 4°C until imaging with the Keyence BZ-X800 fluorescence microscope.

Imaging and quantification were performed by an experimenter blind to the condition and sex of each animal. Images were taken at 20× and stitched together using the BZ-X800 Analyzer program. One hemisphere was selected at random for quantification, where the area of interest was outlined and counted manually using the FIJI multipoint counter tool (Schindelin et al., 2012). Cell counts were averaged per animal.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0. In all studies, the threshold for significance was set to p < 0.05. Data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test or D’Agostino and Pearson. For data that did not follow a normal distribution, nonparametric tests were used as described below. Detailed statistics for each experiment can be found in Table 1 and are referenced by superscripts in Results.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1

Statistics table

Baseline behavioral tests were analyzed using an unpaired Student’s t test (parametric data with equal sample variances), Welch’s t test (parametric data with unequal sample variances), or a Mann–Whitney U test (nonparametric data). For cumulative incidence graphs, Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated and were followed by Mantel–Cox log-rank test (followed by Bonferroni when applicable). Fluid intake and preference were analyzed by a mixed model two-way ANOVA, using session as a within-subjects factor and sex as a between-subjects factor. Cumulative intake data were analyzed using an unpaired Student’s t test (equal sample variances) or an unpaired Welch’s t test (unequal sample variances). When behavioral tests were repeated (following drinking), data were analyzed using a three-way mixed ANOVA (using time as a within-subjects factor while EtOH and sex were analyzed as between-subjects factors). When applicable, Bonferroni’s correction was used for multiple comparisons. Correlational analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation (parametric data) or Spearman’s correlation (nonparametric data). To compare correlations between males and females, Fisher’s r to z transformation was used: Fisher’sZ:zr=0.5ln((1 + r)/(1−r))wherer=Pearson’sr(orSpearman’srs).

Zr from males and females (denoted zm and zf, respectively) was used to compute an observed z value, zobs with the following calculation: zobs=zm−zfsqrt(1/(Nm−3) + 1/(Nf−3)), where N = number of males (Nm) or females (Nf).

In each set of correlations, the same analysis (Pearson’s or Spearman’s) was used for both sexes to calculate a zobs.

Immunofluorescence data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA using sex and EtOH as between-subjects factors.

Results

Experimental timeline

As shown in Figure 1A, rats were single-housed for one week before the onset of behavioral tests, which were conducted on separate but consecutive days. After baseline testing was complete, rats were left undisturbed for 3 d before being split into two groups, one allowed access to a bottle containing water and a bottle containing 20% EtOH under an intermittent access paradigm, and the other allowed access to only water bottles. After three weeks of drinking, postdrinking behavioral testing began. These tests were separated by at least two drinking sessions to ensure testing did not disrupt EtOH consumption. During each test, rats were run in a pseudo-randomized subject order to minimize effects of circadian cycle and withdrawal time. After the last behavioral test, rats underwent a final EtOH drinking session. Twenty-four hours after the final drinking session, rats were perfused and tissue was collected as described above.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Experimental timeline and baseline behavior. A, Timeline of entire experiment. B, Mechanical sensitivity in Von Frey test, as measured by paw withdrawal threshold. C, Thermal sensitivity in the Hargreaves test, as measured by latency to withdraw. Affective behavior as measured by latency to groom (D) and time spent grooming (E). Cumulative incidence of grooming initiation is shown in Extended Data Figure 1-1. F, Affective behavior in the novelty suppressed feeding test, as measured by latency to eat. G, Appetitive behavior in the novelty suppressed feeding test, as measured by post-test consumption. Cumulative incidence of feeding initiation is shown in Extended Data Figure 1-2. ****p < 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney test). Data are expressed as individual points with bars representing mean + SEM.

Extended Data Figure 1-1

Cumulative incidence of grooming initiation in the splash test. Even when accounting for the rats that never groomed (rather than artificially assigning them a maximum value or excluding them from studies), there was no sex difference in grooming initiation (Mantel–Cox log-rank test: χ2 = 1.430, df = 1, p = 0.2318). There was also no sex difference in total time spent grooming (C; Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.8901). Download Figure 1-1, EPS file.

Extended Data Figure 1-2

Cumulative incidence of feeding initiation in the novelty suppressed feeding test. There was no effect of sex on cumulative occurrence of feeding initiation (B; Mantel–Cox log-rank test, χ2 = 0.3366, df = 1, p = 0.5618). Download Figure 1-2, EPS file.

Baseline affective and nociceptive behavior

Rats underwent a series of baseline behavioral tests to probe potential sex differences in behavior before EtOH drinking. In particular, we found sex differences in the Von Frey test of mechanosensitivity where female rats exhibited decreased withdrawal thresholdsa, suggesting increased mechanical sensitivity (Fig. 1B). However, these differences were unique to mechanosensation, as there were no sex differences in the Hargreaves test of thermosensitivityb (Fig. 1C). Additionally, there were no sex differences in the splash test parameters including latency to groomc (Fig. 1D) or time spent groomingd (Fig. 1E). Some animals never initiated grooming and were thus assigned artificial latency values of 600 s; however, cumulative incidence of grooming initiation curves (Extended Data Fig. 1-1) revealed no differences between sexes. There were also no sex differences in latency to eate (Fig. 1F; log-transformed in Extended Data Fig. 1-2A) or post-test home-cage chow consumptionf (Fig. 1G) in the NSF test. Similarly, there were no differences in cumulative initiation of feeding (Extended Data Fig. 1-2B). Together, these results indicate that while female CRF1-cre rats display increased basal mechanosensitvity, there are no sex differences in the splash test or NSF.

Voluntary EtOH drinking

After assessing baseline affective behavior, rats were divided into two groups. The rats in the EtOH group were presented with 20% EtOH and water under an intermittent access two-bottle-choice procedure, whereas the rats in the water group received two water bottles. While there were no significant sex differences in overall EtOH intakeg (Fig. 2A); females consumed significantly more EtOH in the first week of drinkingh (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, there were no sex differences in water intake overalli (Fig. 2C) or during the first weekj (Fig. 2D), but water intake decreased over time in both sexes. We also looked at EtOH preference, calculated as volume of 20% EtOH consumed divided by volume of total fluid consumed during the session × 100%. While EtOH preference increased over time in a nonsex-dependent mannerk (Fig. 2E), females exhibited a stronger EtOH preference during the first weekl (Fig. 2F). Additionally, females consumed significantly more total fluid compared with males overallm (Fig. 2G) and during the first weekn (Fig. 2H). There were no significant correlations between any of the nociceptive or affective behaviors tested and initial EtOH intake (Extended Data Fig. 2-1).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Voluntary EtOH drinking under an intermittent access paradigm. A, EtOH intake over time. B, Cumulative EtOH intake during the first week of EtOH access. C, Water intake over time. D, Cumulative water intake during the first week of EtOH access. E, EtOH preference over time. F, Cumulative EtOH preference during the first week of EtOH access. G, Total fluid intake over time. H, Cumulative total fluid intake during the first week of EtOH access. Relationship between baseline nociceptive and affective behavior is shown in Extended Data Figure 2-1. **p < 0.01, *p < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test); &p < 0.05 (two-way ANOVA, main effect of sex); @p < 0.05 (unpaired Welch’s t test). Data are expressed as individual points (when feasible) with bars representing mean + SEM.

Extended Data Figure 2-1

Behavioral measures did not correlate with first day EtOH intake in both males (M) and females (F). There was a trend where the rats with lower withdrawal thresholds drank more EtOH (A). Interestingly, there was no association between initial EtOH intake and basal thermal withdrawal (B), or basal latency to groom (C) and time spent grooming (D) in the splash test. There was also no significant relationship between initial EtOH intake and latency to eat (E) or post-test consumption (F) in the NSF test. Pearson’s correlations: A, M&F: r(14) = −0.4742, p = 0.0635; Males: r(6) = 0.5673, p = 0.1425; Females: r(6) = −0.2699, p = 0.5179; B, M&F r(14) = 0.1836, p = 0.4962; Males: r(6) = 0.3344, p = 0.4162; Females: r(6) = 0.1388 p = 0.7431; F, M&F: r(14) = 0.1751, p = 0.5167; Males: r(6) = 0.4654, p = 0.2451; Females: r(6) = −0.01082, p = 0.9797. Spearman’s correlations: C, M&F: rs(14) = 0.3991, p = 0.1266; Males: rs(6) = 0.03593, p = 0.9434; Females: rs(6) = 0.4637, p = 0.2619; D, M&F together: rs(14) = −0.2088, p = 0.4355, Males: rs(6) = 0.3234, p = 0.4317; Females: rs(6) = −0.4364, p = 0.3036; E, M&F: rs(14) = 0.1177, p = 0.6631; Males: rs(6) = 0.3571; p = 0.3894; Females: rs(6) = −0.2857, p = 0.5008 Download Figure 2-1, EPS file.

EtOH drinking and associated pain sensitivity

After three weeks of EtOH access, the rats began postdrinking behavioral testing beginning with the Von Frey test of mechanosensitivity. There was a main effect of time, where paw withdrawal threshold decreased in all four groupso (Fig. 3A), suggesting that all rats became more sensitive to mechanical stimuli over time. A main effect of EtOHo also emerged, where EtOH-drinking rats had increased paw withdrawal thresholds, indicative of decreased mechanical sensitivity. Furthermore, there was an EtOH by time interaction, where Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed that the decrease in paw withdrawal threshold over time was significantly stronger in water drinking rats compared with EtOH-drinking rats. Bonferroni post hoc analysis also indicated that the main effect of EtOH was driven predominantly by the post-test rather than pre-test, as there was no significant difference between water and EtOH-drinking rats at baseline. Finally, there was a main effect of sexo, where females exhibited decreased paw withdrawal thresholds suggesting increased mechanical sensitivity (consistent with Fig. 1B). Interestingly, paw withdrawal threshold did not correlate with previous dayp (Fig. 3B) or subsequent day EtOH intakeq (Fig. 3C).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Mechanical and thermal sensitivity following chronic EtOH drinking in males and females. The Von Frey test was repeated and mechanical sensitivity (A) was correlated with previous day EtOH intake (B) and subsequent EtOH intake (C). The Hargreaves test was also repeated and thermal sensitivity (D) was correlated with previous day EtOH intake (E) and subsequent EtOH intake (F). Nociceptive testing did not affect EtOH intake, as demonstrated in Extended Data Figure 3-1. ####p < 0.0001 (three-way ANOVA, main effect of time); @p < 0.05 (three-way ANOVA, main effect of EtOH); $$p < 0.01 (Pearson’s correlation); &&p < 0.01 (Fisher’s r to z transformation). Data are presented as individual points. When applicable, bars represent mean. Pearson’s correlations: B, M&F: r(14) = 0.3155, p = 0.2340; Males: r(6) = 0.04,155, p = 0.9222; Females: r(6) = 0.6262, p = 0.0967; C, M&F: r(14) = 0.2660, p = 0.3193; Males: r(6) = 0.03,441, p = 0.9355; Females: r(6) = 0.5708, p = 0.1395; E, M&F: r(14) = 0.2846, p = 0.2853; Males: r(6) = 0.9043, p = 0.0020; Females: r(6) = −0.1378, p = 0.7448; F, M&F: r(14) = −0.03,709, p = 0.8915; Males: r(6) = 0.8494, p = 0.0075; Females: r(6) = −0.6227, p = 0.0991.

Extended Data Figure 3-1

Pain testing does not affect EtOH intake. There was no effect of Von Frey testing (A) or Hargreaves testing (B) on EtOH consumption. Two-way ANOVAs: A, Sex × Day: F(1,14) = 0.1799, p = 0.6779; Sex: F(1,14) = 0.01875, p = 0.8930; Day: F(1,14) = 1.244, p = 0.2835; B, Sex × Day: F(1,14) = 0.01586, p = 0.9016; Sex: F(1,14) = 5.719e005, p = 0.9941; Day: F(1,14) = 0.2869, p = 0.6006 Download Figure 3-1, EPS file.

Next, the Hargreaves test was repeated. In this test, latency to withdraw the paw is used as an index of thermal sensitivity, where increased withdrawal latency is indicative of decreased thermal sensitivity. There were no significant effects of time, EtOH, or sex on withdrawal latencyr (Fig. 3D). Next, correlations examining the relationship between EtOH intake and withdrawal latency were performed. Previous day EtOH intake was directly correlated with withdrawal latency in males but not femaless (Fig. 3E). This association was also seen when examining next day EtOH intake, where withdrawal latency predicted subsequent EtOH intake in males but not femalest (Fig. 3F). The correlation of paw withdrawal threshold and EtOH intake in males as compared with females was statistically significants,t (Fig. 3E,F). Together, these findings reveal that increased EtOH intake is bidirectionally associated with decreased thermal sensitivity in a sex-specific manner. Finally, there were no changes in 24-h EtOH intake produced by behavioral testing (Extended Data Fig. 3-1).

EtOH drinking and associated affective behavior

To examine the effects of chronic EtOH intake on affective behavior, the splash test was repeated after five weeks of voluntary drinking. There was no effect of either EtOH drinking or sex on latency to groomu (Fig. 4A) or total time spent groomingv (Fig. 4B). However, a main effect of time emerged on total time spent grooming, where all rats (regardless of sex or history of EOH drinking) spent significantly less time grooming on the post-test.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Affective behavior in the splash test following chronic EtOH drinking in males and females. Latency to groom (A) and time spent grooming (B) were used as measure of negative affect. To account for animals that failed to groom within the 10 min testing period, cumulative incidence curves for the pre-test and post-test are shown in C and D, respectively. The splash test was repeated and affective behavior was correlated with previous day EtOH intake (E, G) or subsequent EtOH intake (F, H). Data are presented as individual points. When applicable, bars represent mean. This behavioral test did not affect EtOH intake, as demonstrated in Extended Data Figure 4-1. #p < 0.05 (three-way ANOVA, main effect of time); ^p < 0.05, Mantel–Cox log-rank test followed by Bonferroni post hoc, $p < 0.05 (Pearson’s correlation); *p < 0.05 (Spearman’s correlation). Pearson’s correlations: E, M&F: r(14) = 0.6108, p = 0.0120; Males: r(6) = 0.4120, p = 0.3105; Females: r(6) = 0.6172, p = 0.1030; F, M&F: r(13) = 0.2592, p = 0.3508; Males: r(6) = 0.4774, p = 0.2269; Females: r(5) = 0.1107, p = 0.3132. Spearman’s correlations: G, M&F: rs(14) = −0.5859, p = 0.0193; Males: rs(6) = −0.8456, p = 0.0179; Females: rs(6) = 0.07,143, p = 0.0179. H, M&F: rs(13) = −0.02,951, p = 0.9180; Males: rs(6) = 0.09,524, p = 0.8401; Females: rs(5) = −0.1782, p = 0.7182.

Extended Data Figure 4-1

Splash test testing does not affect EtOH Intake. Two-way ANOVA: Sex × Day: F(1,13) = 1.958, p = 0.1852; Sex: F(1,13) = 1.883, p = 0.1932; Day: F(1,13) = 1.989, p = 0.1819 Download Figure 4-1, EPS file.

To account for animals that failed to groom during the 10-min test period, the cumulative incidence of grooming was plotted using the Kaplan–Meier survival curve followed by the Mantel–Cox log-rank test. There were no differences in cumulative incidence of grooming during the pre-testw (Fig. 4C). However, there was a significant effect during the post-testx (Fig. 4D), specifically where there was an increased cumulative incidence of grooming in EtOH-drinking males compared with EtOH-drinking femalesx. This suggests sex differences in latency to groom occur only in rats with a history of EtOH drinking (and not in EtOH-naive rats).

To further investigate the association between EtOH intake and affective behavior, individual EtOH intake during the drinking session immediately before and after the splash test were compared with latency to groom and total time spent grooming. Rats that consumed more EtOH before testing took significantly longer to begin groomingy (Fig. 4E), an effect that was only seen when sexes were combined. This relationship was unidirectional, as latency to groom did not predict subsequent drinkingz (Fig. 4F). Total time spent grooming was also associated with EtOH intake before testing such that rats that consumed more EtOH groomed lessaa (Fig. 4G); however, this effect was primarily driven by femalesw. Additionally, there was no association between total time spent grooming and subsequent EtOH intakeab (Fig. 4H) and the splash test did not affect EtOH intake (Extended Data Fig. 4-1). Together, these data suggest that previous day EtOH intake can predict both latency to groom and time spent grooming in the splash test.

The NSF test was also repeated to investigate changes in latency to eat and home-cage consumption following EtOH drinking. While there was no effect of sex or EtOH drinking on latency to eatac, there was an effect of timeac where all rats decreased their latency to eat on the second test (Fig. 5A). Post-test home-cage consumption was monitored for 10 min following the test. Compared with baseline, all the rats ate significantly less in their home-cage (Fig. 5B). There were no differences in cumulative incidence of feeding initiation during baseline or after chronic drinking (Extended Data Fig. 5-1) suggesting that while rats decreased their latency to eat in the NSF, there were no differences between the EtOH and water-drinking groups.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Affective behavior in the novelty suppressed feeding test following chronic EtOH drinking in males and females. Latency to eat (A) and post-test consumption (B) were used as measured of affective and appetitive behavior. Cumulative incidence of feeding initiation is shown in Extended Data Figure 5-1A,B. Affective behavior was correlated with previous day EtOH intake (C) or subsequent EtOH intake (D). Appetitive behavior was not correlated with previous day EtOH intake (E) or subsequent EtOH intake (F). This test did not affect EtOH intake, as shown in Extended Data Figure 5-1C. There were no differences in body weight change, nor did the change correlate with latency to eat or post-test consumption, as shown in Extended Data Figure 5-2. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 (three-way ANOVA, main effect of time); $p < 0.05 (Pearson’s correlation); *p < 0.05 (Spearman’s correlation). Data are presented as individual points. When applicable, bars represent mean. Spearman’s correlations: C, M&F: rs(14) = 0.5647, p = 0.0248; Males: rs(6) = 0.7381, p = 0.0458; Females: rs(6) = 0.4286, p = 0.2992; D, M&F: rs(14) = 0.1912, p = 0.4769; Males: rs(6) = 0.6667, p = 0.0831; Females: rs(6) = −0.1905, p = 0.6646. Pearson’s correlations: E, M&F: r(14) = 0.4202, p = 0.1051; Males: r(6) = 0.1630, p = 0.6997; Females: r(6) = −0.6833 p = 0.0617; F, M&F: r(14) = 0.1875, p = 0.4867; Males: r(6) = −0.1263, p = 0.7657; Females: r(6) = 0.4296 p = 0.2881.

Extended Data Figure 5-1

Cumulative occurrence of behavioral initiation in the NSF is not affected by EtOH drinking, nor is EtOH intake affected by NSF testing. There was no effect of group on cumulative occurrence of feeding initiation in the pre-test (A; Mantel–Cox log-rank test; χ2 = 0.5295, df = 3, p = 0.9124) or post-test (B; Mantel–Cox log-rank test; χ2 = 3.717, df = 3, p = 0.2937). Lastly, there was no effect of testing on EtOH intake (C; two-way ANOVA; Sex × Day: F(1,13) = 0.5462, p = 0.4721; Sex: F(1,14) = 1.901, p = 0.3442; Day: F(1,14) = 1.901, p = 0.1896). Download Figure 5-1, EPS file.

Extended Data Figure 5-2

Percent change in body weight does not account for effects seen in NSF. There was no difference in body weight changes (A; two-way ANOVA; Sex × EtOH: F(1,28) = 0.01105, p = 0.9170; Sex: F(1,28) = 1.998, p = 0.1685; EtOH: F(1,28) = 0.002337, p = 0.9618). Body weight change was not associated with latency to eat (B; M&F: rs(14) = −0.01471, p = 0.9607; Males: rs(6) = −0.2619, p = 0.5364; Females: rs(6) = 0.02381, p = 0.9768) or post-test consumption (C; M&F: r(14) = −0.2642, p = 0.3228; Males: r(6) = −0.2771, p = 0.5064; Females: r(6) = −0.2744 p = 0.5107). One important consideration is that body weights were not measured immediately before food deprivation (and instead were taken 1 week prior to the test). However, body weights were taken on the day of the NSF test (i.e., following 24 h of food deprivation). Percent body weight was calculated as [100 + 100 × (body weightNSF day – body weight1 week prior)/body weight1 week prior]. Download Figure 5-2, EPS file.

Associations between NSF behavioral measures and EtOH drinking were performed to examine potential individual effects of EtOH drinking on behavior. Rats that consumed more EtOH before the NSF test had increased latencies to eatae, and this effect was driven primarily by males (Fig. 5C). There were no significant correlations between latency to eat and subsequent EtOH intakeaf (Fig. 5D). Post-test home-cage consumption did not correlate with previous dayag (Fig. 5E) or subsequent EtOH intakeah (Fig. 5F). Similar to the splash test, there was no effect of testing on EtOH intake in either sex (Extended Data Fig. 5-1). Additionally, there was no effect of EtOH or sex on changes in body weight, nor did body weight change correlate with NSF behavioral measures (Extended Data Fig. 5-2). Together, these correlations suggest that EtOH intake is correlated with subsequent latency to eat on the NSF test.

EtOH drinking and medial prefrontal cortex activity

Following the NSF test, rats were allowed one final drinking session before brains were collected and the medial prefrontal cortex was stained for RFP (to identify CRF1+ cells) and cFos (a marker of neuronal activity). The medial prefrontal cortex was divided into prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) cortices, based on the Paxinos and Watson atlas (Paxinos and Watson, 2007).

When investigating PL (Fig. 6A), there were no differences between EtOH-drinking and water-drinking groups when examining CRF1+ cellsai (Fig. 6B), cFos+ cellsaj (Fig. 6C), total double-labeled cellsak (Fig. 6D), or double-labeled cells as a percentage of total CRF1+ cellsal (Fig. 6E). Additionally, final session EtOH intake was not associated with any of these cell counts (Extended Data Fig. 6-1). In the IL (Fig. 6F), there was no effect of sex or EtOH on CRF1+ cellsam (Fig. 6G). However, females had increased cFos+ cellsan (Fig. 6H). There were no significant differences in total double-labeled cellsao (Fig. 6I), but the increased expression in females seen in Figure 6H persisted when double-labeled cells were expressed as %CRF1+ cellsap (Fig. 6J). The number of CRF1+ cells was directly correlated with EtOH intake in femalesaq but was inversely correlated with EtOH intake in malesaq (Fig. 6K). Additionally, the number of cFos+ cells was inversely correlated with EtOH intake in males onlyar (Fig. 6L). Consistent with the correlations seen thus far, total double-labeled cells was inversely correlated with EtOH intake in males onlyas (Fig. 6M); however, this correlation disappeared when double labeled cells were normalized to %CRF1+ cellsat (Fig. 6N). Taken together, these findings highlight differential effects of EtOH drinking on medial prefrontal cortex subdivisions, and suggest sex-dependent and dose-dependent effects of EtOH on IL CRF1+ and cFos+ cells.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Prefrontal correlates of EtOH drinking in males and females. Slices containing both the prelimbic cortex (PL) and infralimbic cortex (IL) were stained for RFP (as a measure of CRF1+ neurons, shown in red) and cFos (as a measure of cellular activity, shown in green). PL representative images (A) showing CRF1+ (B), cFos+ (C), and total double labeled cells (D). Double labeled cells were also expressed as % total CRF1+ cells (E). Cell counts in the PL did not correlate with EtOH intake, as shown in Extended Data Figure 6-1. IL representative images (F) showing CRF1+ (G), cFos+ (H) and total double labeled cells (I). Double labeled cells were also expressed as % total CRF1+ cells (J). We also correlated EtOH intake on the last day with IL labeling of CRF1+ cells (K), cFos+ cells (L), total double labeled cells (M) and double labeled cells as %CRF1+ (N). Data are presented as individual points. When applicable, bars represent mean + SEM. Scale bars= 100 μm; %% p < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA; main effect of sex); $p < 0.05 (Pearson’s correlation); &&p < 0.01 (Fisher’s r to z transformation). Pearson’s correlations: K, M&F: r(14) = −0.07,998, p = 0.7684; Males: r(6) = −0.7277, p = 0.0407; Females: r(6) = 0.8307, p = 0.0106; L, M&F: r(14) = −0.1695, p = 0.5403; Males: r(6) = −0.7775, p = 0.0231; Females: r(6) = 0.2192, p = 0.6022; M, M&F: r(14) = −0.1909, p = 0.4787; Males: r(6) = −0.7752, p = 0.0238; Females: r(6) = 0.5508, p = 0.1571; N, M&F: r(14) = −0.3485, p = 0.1858; Males: r(6) = −0.5444, p = 0.1630; Females: r(6) = −0.4090, p = 0.3144.

Extended Data Figure 6-1

Correlations between EtOH intake and activity in the prelimbic cortex. EtOH intake did not correlate with CRF1+ expression (A), cFos+ cells (B), total double-labeled cells (C) or double-labeled cells when expressed as %CRF1+ cells (D). Spearman’s correlations: A, M&F: rs(14) = −0.1735, p = 0.5193; Males: rs(6) = −0.5476, p = 0.1710; Females: rs(6) = 0.09524, p = 0.8401. Pearson’s correlations: B, M&F: r(14) = −0.1997, p = 0.4582; Males: r(6) = −0.25643, p = 0.5271; Females: r(6) = −0.3325, p = 0.4210); C, M&F: r(14) = −0.07430, p = 0.7842; Males: r(6) = −0.2966, p = 0.4757; Females: r(6) = −0.02222, p = 0.9583; D, M&F: r(14) = −0.01427, p = 0.9582; Males: r(6) = −0.1604, p = 0.7043; Females: r(6) = −0.09422, p = 0.82. Download Figure 6-1, EPS file.

Discussion

The current study examined the dynamic relationship between affective state, pain sensitivity, and alcohol intake in male and female CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats. While female rats displayed increased basal sensitivity to mechanical stimuli, there were no other sex differences in baseline behavior. Females consumed significantly more EtOH during the first week of intermittent access, but overall EtOH intake was not significantly different between males and females. EtOH drinking decreased mechanical sensitivity in both male and female rats, but mechanical sensitivity did not correlate with previous or subsequent EtOH intake. Conversely, there were no group effects of EtOH on thermal sensitivity; but in males, decreased thermal sensitivity was associated with increased EtOH intake before and after the Hargreaves test. There were no group effects of EtOH on behaviors in the splash test or NSF test; however, affective behavior was directly correlated with EtOH intake before testing, but not with subsequent EtOH intake. Additionally, all groups displayed increased mechanical sensitivity, decreased time spent grooming in the splash test, and decreased home-cage consumption during the NSF test when compared with their baseline levels. Finally, we investigated potential effects of EtOH intake on the activity of CRF1-containing neurons in the prelimbic and infralimbic prefrontal cortex. While there were no significant group effects of EtOH drinking on overall or CRF1-specific activity, there were significant sex-specific associations between EtOH intake and activity in the infralimbic region. These findings provide new insight into individual differences in EtOH intake and its association with affective state, nociception, and neuronal activation of CRF1-containing neurons in key regions of the prefrontal cortex.

One important goal of this study was to examine affective and nociceptive behavior and EtOH drinking in both sexes of CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats. There was no effect of sex on basal affective behavior with the exception of mechanical sensitivity, where female rats displayed increase mechanical sensitivity. One previous study examined pain sensitivity in male and female CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats; however, data were not reported by sex (Weera et al., 2022). Compared with that study (as well as other work in Wistar rats; Ririe and Eisenach, 2006; Edwards et al., 2012; Geng et al., 2016; Pahng et al., 2017), our rats had significantly lower withdrawal thresholds. This discrepancy could be because of stress associated with social isolation, as others have found social isolation increases mechanical sensitivity (Horiguchi et al., 2013; Nishinaka et al., 2015). Alternatively, the lower thresholds may be because of including differences in housing environment, breeding/transport differences, or equipment/testing environment differences including social transfer of stress (M.J. Smith et al., 2016, 2017, 2021; Sterley et al., 2018). Interestingly, previous work in our lab using rats had more typical paw withdrawal threshold values (Quadir et al., 2022).

Future studies will investigate these discrepancies further and in greater depth. Studies involving Wistar rats (the background strain for the CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats) also found no sex differences in baseline affective behavior in the splash test (Keledjian et al., 2020; Abelaira et al., 2022). Sex differences in the NSF test in Wistar rats are less clear: one study found females exhibited increased affective behavior (De Oliveira Sergio et al., 2021); however, other studies report no sex differences (Francis-Oliveira et al., 2013; Cabbia et al., 2018; Enayati et al., 2020). Following baseline behavioral testing, rats were allowed to voluntarily drink EtOH under an intermittent access paradigm. In this study, male and female CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats drank 2–4 g/kg EtOH with an approximate 15–30% EtOH preference, consistent with studies in Wistar rats (Adermark et al., 2011; Cippitelli et al., 2012; Momeni and Roman, 2014; Kimbrough et al., 2017; Albrechet-Souza et al., 2020; Scott et al., 2020; Moench and Logrip, 2021). While there were no sex differences in EtOH intake throughout the experiment, females drank significantly more EtOH during the first week. Studies comparing male and female EtOH intake under intermittent access conditions in Wistar rats are limited and inconclusive: some researchers found that females drank more EtOH whereas others found no sex differences (Priddy et al., 2017; Albrechet-Souza et al., 2020). Further studies will examine EtOH drinking in other contexts, such as binge-drinking or drinking following abstinence from EtOH. The studies presented here expand our knowledge of baseline behavior and EtOH intake in male and female CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats and provide a key foundation for future studies.

Although the behavioral tests used in these studies examine different aspects of affective and nociceptive behavior, one common theme emerged in the postdrinking tests: these behaviors increased in both EtOH drinking animals as well as EtOH-naive animals. Specifically, we found increases in the Von Frey test (decreased withdrawal thresholds, suggesting increased mechanical sensitivity), splash test (decreased time spent grooming, suggestive of increased negative affect), and NSF test (decreased post-test consumption, suggestive of decreased appetite). Our study aimed to investigate the directionality of the relationship between negative affect, nociception, and EtOH drinking; therefore, having baseline measures was crucial. However, affective tests are rarely repeated in the same subjects; thus, there are limited findings regarding the effects of time and re-testing on behavior. Our lab previously demonstrated that male rats, but not female rats, spent significantly less time grooming on the second splash test (Quadir et al., 2022).

Additionally, test conditions were not changed between pre-test and post-test. Although this was intentionally designed based on findings that demonstrate three weeks is sufficient to wait between testing (Adamec and Shallow, 2000; Adamec et al., 2005; Blasio et al., 2014; Goes et al., 2015), we cannot rule out the possibility that associations between negative affect and EtOH intake may actually reflect memory impairments and EtOH intake. Indeed, repeated studies show that EtOH exposure can impair memory retrieval (Land and Spear, 2004; Houlé et al., 2017). Another important caveat is that these tests are designed to present a novel anxiogenic environment to the animal being tested. However, with repeated testing, the environment loses its novelty. Thus, the main effect of time decreasing in latency to eat in the NSF may simply reflect that the test environment was no longer novel. Interestingly, this did not occur when investigating the latency to groom in the splash test, suggesting the possibility of test-specific memory. One explanation is the food deprivation stress along with the bright lighting (150 lux) in the NSF resulted in stronger memory formation (Ye et al., 2018; Stelly et al., 2020). The splash test, on the other hand, was conducted without food restriction and in a darker environment; thus, the stress of the splash test may not have been significant enough to induce a stronger context-induced memory. Similar to this, the novelty of the Hargreaves and Von Frey apparatuses may have resulted in stress-induced analgesia, a phenomenon seen repeatedly in Wistar rats (Vendruscolo et al., 2004, 2006) as well as in mice (Kambur et al., 2008; Kurrikoff et al., 2008), which may have contributed to the decreased pain thresholds seen at Von Frey re-testing.

Many studies have reported increased negative affect and nociception following chronic EtOH drinking (Overstreet et al., 2005; Van Skike et al., 2015; Gong et al., 2017; Quadir et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021). However, there were no group effects of EtOH on thermal sensitivity or affective behavior in the studies presented here. One potential explanation is that rats in the present study only consumed EtOH for three to four weeks before behavioral testing and thus did not consume enough EtOH to produce behavioral deficits. Studies in Wistar rats report escalated intake after ∼20 EtOH drinking sessions (Carnicella et al., 2009; George et al., 2012; Kimbrough et al., 2017), whereas rats in this study only drank for 16 sessions. Others have found that various aspects of EtOH withdrawal (including increased negative affect behavior, seizures, and EtOH intake during withdrawal) increase with repeated EtOH withdrawal cycles (Becker, 1996; Holter et al., 1998; Rimondini et al., 2003; Overstreet et al., 2004; Lopez and Becker, 2005; Z. Zhang et al., 2007). Another possibility is that the environment was too anxiogenic, creating a ceiling effect on negative affect. Recent studies have developed methods to test affective behavior in the home-cage (Neira et al., 2022) to remove this potential confound and will be considered in future work.

Despite the lack of group effects of EtOH, there were significant individual correlations between behavioral readouts and EtOH intake, thus highlighting the importance of examining individual differences in the context of EtOH-related behaviors. More specifically, this study found previous EtOH intake correlated with thermal sensitivity as well as alterations in affective behavior. There was an inverse relationship between EtOH intake and thermal sensitivity, where males that consumed more EtOH were less sensitive to thermal stimuli and males with increased thermal sensitivity consumed less EtOH on the next day. These findings are in accordance with a previous study reporting that EtOH withdrawal increases nociceptive threshold (Schunck et al., 2015). However, it is important to note that other studies have demonstrated EtOH-induced decreases in pain threshold (Avegno et al., 2018; Kononoff et al., 2018; Walcott et al., 2018; S. Kang et al., 2019b; You et al., 2020). One potential explanation is that EtOH-induced peripheral neuropathy blunted the ability of the rats to feel the thermal stimulus. This would be consistent with the group effect of EtOH on mechanical sensitivity, where the EtOH group had increased paw withdrawal thresholds, corresponding to decreased mechanical sensitivity. An alternative possibility is that CRF1:cre:tdTomato rats may be resistant to the analgesic properties of EtOH; however, additional studies are required to examine this in more detail. One final possibility is that male EtOH rats are more sensitive to stress-induced analgesia. Studies have found brief exposures to forced swim and predator odor decreased thermal nociception in both male and female Wistar rats (Vendruscolo et al., 2004, 2006), but whether chronic low doses of EtOH drinking is a sufficient stressor to induce hyperalgesia remains unclear.

In addition to associations with thermal sensitivity, previous day EtOH intake was also associated with negative affect in the splash test and NSF test. These associations were specific to the EtOH group as they are lost when water-drinking animals are included in the analysis (data not shown), likely because of the loss of dynamic range when EtOH intake is zero for all subjects. Collectively, these results suggest that while basal negative affect is variable and likely determined by a number of factors, chronic drinking does contribute to EtOH-affective state interactions. These findings are consistent with previous studies that demonstrate increased fear-potentiated startle in various genetic lines of alcohol preferring rats (McKinzie et al., 2000) and mice (Barrenha and Chester, 2007). While all of these correlations held true when both sexes were analyzed together, analyzing the sexes separately revealed that the EtOH intake associations with negative affect in the NSF were primarily driven by males whereas EtOH intake associations with negative affect in the splash test were primarily driven by females. These findings suggest test-specific contributions of sex in EtOH-induced alterations in affective behavior. Interestingly, these behaviors were unable to predict subsequent EtOH intake in either sex. Other studies have mixed findings regarding associations of affective behavior and subsequent drinking with significant correlations found in some studies (Spanagel et al., 1995; Hayton et al., 2012; Pelloux et al., 2015) but not others (Henniger et al., 2002; Da Silva et al., 2004; Correia et al., 2009; McNamara and Ito, 2021).

The effects of alcohol on affective and nociceptive behaviors are known to be mediated by key brain regions including the medial prefrontal cortex. Many studies fail to differentiate the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) subdivisions of this region, but it is clear that these regions often play opposing roles in mediating behavior. For example, dopamine blockade in the PL reduces place conditioning without affecting cue conditioning but dopamine blockade in the IL reduces cue conditioning without affecting place conditioning (Hayen et al., 2014). While both PL and IL are active during cue-induced reinstatement of EtOH seeking, only ablation of activity-dependent IL neurons inhibited EtOH seeking (Pfarr et al., 2015). Another study found that EtOH drinking during adolescence increased Arc immunoreactivity in PL (but not in IL), whereas EtOH drinking during adulthood increased Arc immunoreactivity in IL (but not PL; Lawson et al., 2022). While the lack of effect in PL is consistent with the present findings, the effects in IL were divergent in that our study found decreased activity in the IL whereas their study found increased IL activity. In addition to species differences (mice vs rats), the timing of tissue collection may explain the differences seen. In the referenced study, brains were collected 25 d after the last drinking session, but in the studies presented here, brains were collected 24 h after the last drinking session. It is possible that increased length of abstinence results in compensatory upregulation of neuronal activity. Indeed, many studies have demonstrated opposing effects during short-term abstinence (∼24 h) and long-term abstinence (>7 d; Cannady et al., 2020; R.J. Smith et al., 2020).

PL and IL also exert opposing effects on stress reactivity, especially in the context of EtOH. One important study found that the CRF1 antagonist CP154,526 injected directly into the IL could inhibit stress-induced reinstatement of EtOH seeking, an effect that did not occur if the drug was injected directly into the PL (Flores-Ramirez et al., 2022). These studies highlight the necessity of investigating PL and IL as separate regions, rather than combining them into one, particularly in the context of EtOH and behavior. In the studies presented here, there were no group differences or individual differences in the effects of chronic EtOH drinking on neuronal activation (cFos+ cells) or activation of CRF1+ cells (double labeled cells) in the PL. However, individual differences emerged when examining the association between EtOH intake and cFos+ cells as well as EtOH intake and activated CRF1+ cells in the IL. Not only were these associations region-specific, but also sex-dependent as the correlations only occurred in male rats. There are limited studies investigating the effects of EtOH drinking in CRF1+ cells in the PL and IL subdivisions of the PFC. One study investigated the effects of EtOH self-administration and extinction on Crhr1 mRNA levels in the IL of male rats and found that three weeks of self-administration followed by 10d of extinction decreased Crhr1 transcript levels in the IL (Flores-Ramirez et al., 2022). This is in line with our findings that demonstrate EtOH drinking is associated with decreased activity of CRF1+ cells in the IL. However, future studies manipulating the activity of these cells will need to be done to confirm a direct role of CRF1+ cells in mediating EtOH intake. Researchers have also reported that CRF1 antagonists injected directly into the PFC (not separating PL and IL) blunts EtOH intake (Robinson et al., 2019). One important consideration is that most prior studies examined changes in CRF1 transcript levels or CRF1 activity via antagonists; however, our studies examined the effects of EtOH on cells that contain CRF1 and thus cannot be compared directly. One important study found that EtOH vapor withdrawal decreases excitability and excitatory neurotransmission in CRF1+ neurons in the prefrontal cortex (Patel et al., 2022); however, this study was only performed in male mice and did not separate PL from IL. One final limitation from these findings is that cFos expression peaks at 30–90 min following a stimulus and returns to baseline levels within 12 h (Barros et al., 2015), complicating the ability to examine associations between neuronal activity and affective/nociceptive behaviors. Future studies will examine ΔFosB expression, as it is marker of longer-term neuronal activity. Collectively, these studies highlight the relevance of including both sexes and subregions while examining the effects of chronic EtOH drinking. One final limitation is this work only focused on one region of the brain, the medial PFC. There are many other brain regions that are implicated in EtOH drinking, affective behavior, and nociception that are also rich with CRF and CRF1. These regions include the central amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and periaqueductal gray (Ji et al., 2007; Litvin et al., 2007; Francesconi et al., 2009; Miguel and Nunes-de-Souza, 2011; Gozzi et al., 2013; Ide et al., 2013; Tran et al., 2014; Faria et al., 2016; Natividad et al., 2017; Avegno et al., 2018; Agoglia et al., 2022). These areas are outside the scope of this project but will be investigated in the future.

Together, our results illustrate the complex interplay between affective state, EtOH drinking, and the role of prefrontal cortex CRF1+ neurons in mediating these behaviors. Moreover, these data highlight the importance of examining individual differences in addition to group averages when investigating AUD-related behaviors and affective states. There are currently only four FDA-approved medications to treat AUD, and persistent issues with efficacy and compliance complicate effective treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated differential efficacies of medications when stratified by factors such as sex, age of AUD onset, severity of AUD, and impulsivity levels (Zorrilla et al., 2013; Leggio et al., 2020). However, co-morbidity of AUD and affective disorders remains an underexamined issue. Thus, additional studies that consider individual differences and sex in affective behavior and population-specific neurobiological changes in the context of AUD are warranted.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments: We thank Jasmine J Jahad for their help in early intermittent access drinking experiments.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no competing financial interests.

  • This work was supported by National Institute of Health Grants AA011605 (to M.A.H.), AA026858 (to M.A.H.), AA007573 (to S.G.Q.), AA030493 (to S.G.Q.), and GM135095 (to D.P.E.).

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.

References

  1. ↵
    Abelaira HM, Rosa T, de Moura AB, Andrade NM, Martinello NS, Maciel LR, Botelho MEM, Borba LA, Chede BC, Arent CO, Joaquim L, Bonfante S, Danielski LG, Tuon T, Petronilho F, Quevedo J, Réus GZ (2022) Combination of electroconvulsive stimulation with ketamine or escitalopram protects the brain against inflammation and oxidative stress induced by maternal deprivation and is critical for associated behaviors in male and female rats. Mol Neurobiol 59:1452–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-021-02718-x pmid:34994953
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Abernathy K, Chandler LJ, Woodward JJ (2010) Alcohol and the prefrontal cortex. Int Rev Neurobiol 91:289–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(10)91009-X pmid:20813246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Adamec R, Shallow T (2000) Effects of baseline anxiety on response to kindling of the right medial amygdala. Physiol Behav 70:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(00)00247-x pmid:10978480
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Adamec R, Shallow T, Burton P (2005) Anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects of kindling–role of baseline anxiety and anatomical location of the kindling electrode in response to kindling of the right and left basolateral amygdala. Behav Brain Res 159:73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.10.004 pmid:15795000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Adermark L, Jonsson S, Ericson M, Söderpalm B (2011) Intermittent ethanol consumption depresses endocannabinoid-signaling in the dorsolateral striatum of rat. Neuropharmacology 61:1160–1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.01.014 pmid:21251919
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Agoglia AE, Zhu M, Quadir SG, Bluitt MN, Douglass E, Hanback T, Tella J, Ying R, Hodge CW, Herman MA (2022) Sex-specific plasticity in CRF regulation of inhibitory control in central amygdala CRF1 neurons after chronic voluntary alcohol drinking. Addict Biol 27:e13067. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13067 pmid:34075665
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    Albrechet-Souza L, Schratz CL, Gilpin NW (2020) Sex differences in traumatic stress reactivity in rats with and without a history of alcohol drinking. Biol Sex Differ 11:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-020-00303-w pmid:32393336
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    American Psychiatric Association (2013) Alcohol use disorder. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
  9. ↵
    Andalib S, Mashhadi-Mousapour M, Bijani S, Hosseini MJ (2019) Coenzyme Q(10) alleviated behavioral dysfunction and bioenergetic function in an animal model of depression. Neurochem Res 44:1182–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-019-02761-0 pmid:30820817
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Anker JJ, Kushner MG (2019) Co-occurring alcohol use disorder and anxiety: bridging psychiatric, psychological, and neurobiological perspectives. Alcohol Res 40:arcr.v40.1.03.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    Avegno EM, Lobell TD, Itoga CA, Baynes BB, Whitaker AM, Weera MM, Edwards S, Middleton JW, Gilpin NW (2018) Central amygdala circuits mediate hyperalgesia in alcohol-dependent rats. J Neurosci 38:7761–7773. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0483-18.2018 pmid:30054393
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Barbier E, Barchiesi R, Domi A, Chanthongdee K, Domi E, Augier G, Augier E, Xu L, Adermark L, Heilig M (2021) Downregulation of synaptotagmin 1 in the prelimbic cortex drives alcohol-associated behaviors in rats. Biol Psychiatry 89:398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.08.027 pmid:33160605
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Barbieri SS, Sandrini L, Musazzi L, Popoli M, Ieraci A (2021) Apocynin prevents anxiety-like behavior and histone deacetylases overexpression induced by sub-chronic stress in mice. Biomolecules 11:885. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060885
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    Barrenha GD, Chester JA (2007) Genetic correlation between innate alcohol preference and fear-potentiated startle in selected mouse lines. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31:1081–1088. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00396.x pmid:17451404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Barros VN, Mundim M, Galindo LT, Bittencourt S, Porcionatto M, Mello LE (2015) The pattern of c-Fos expression and its refractory period in the brain of rats and monkeys. Front Cell Neurosci 9:72. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00072 pmid:25814929
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Becker HC (1996) The alcohol withdrawal “kindling” phenomenon: clinical and experimental findings. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 20:121A–124A. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01760.x pmid:8947249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Bijani S, Dizaji R, Sharafi A, Hosseini MJ (2022) Neuroprotective effect of apigenin on depressive-like behavior: mechanistic approach. Neurochem Res 47:644–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-021-03473-0 pmid:34705188
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    Blasio A, Rice KC, Sabino V, Cottone P (2014) Characterization of a shortened model of diet alternation in female rats: effects of the CB1 receptor antagonist rimonabant on food intake and anxiety-like behavior. Behav Pharmacol 25:609–617. https://doi.org/10.1097/FBP.0000000000000059 pmid:25011007
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Bloodgood DW, Hardaway JA, Stanhope CM, Pati D, Pina MM, Neira S, Desai S, Boyt KM, Palmiter RD, Kash TL (2021) Kappa opioid receptor and dynorphin signaling in the central amygdala regulates alcohol intake. Mol Psychiatry 26:2187–2199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0690-z pmid:32099099
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Boschloo L, Vogelzangs N, van den Brink W, Smit JH, Veltman DJ, Beekman AT, Penninx BW (2013) Depressive and anxiety disorders predicting first incidence of alcohol use disorders: results of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). J Clin Psychiatry 74:1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.12m08159 pmid:24434092
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Bouras NN, Mack NR, Gao WJ (2023) Prefrontal modulation of anxiety through a lens of noradrenergic signaling. Front Syst Neurosci 17:1173326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2023.1173326 pmid:37139472
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Brachman RA, McGowan JC, Perusini JN, Lim SC, Pham TH, Faye C, Gardier AM, Mendez-David I, David DJ, Hen R, Denny CA (2016) Ketamine as a prophylactic against stress-induced depressive-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry 79:776–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.04.022 pmid:26037911
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Bradley RG, Binder EB, Epstein MP, Tang Y, Nair HP, Liu W, Gillespie CF, Berg T, Evces M, Newport DJ, Stowe ZN, Heim CM, Nemeroff CB, Schwartz A, Cubells JF, Ressler KJ (2008) Influence of child abuse on adult depression: moderation by the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65:190–200. https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.26 pmid:18250257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Breese GR, Overstreet DH, Knapp DJ, Navarro M (2005) Prior multiple ethanol withdrawals enhance stress-induced anxiety-like behavior: inhibition by CRF1- and benzodiazepine-receptor antagonists and a 5-HT1a-receptor agonist. Neuropsychopharmacology 30:1662–1669. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300706 pmid:15726114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Brufatto JPT, Lagatta DC, Uliana DL, Firmino EMS, Borges-Assis AB, Resstel LBM (2021) Ventromedial prefrontal cortex CRF1 receptors modulate the tachycardic activity of baroreflex. Pflugers Arch 473:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-020-02512-z pmid:33839941
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    Cabbia R, Consoli A, Suchecki D (2018) Association of 24 h maternal deprivation with a saline injection in the neonatal period alters adult stress response and brain monoamines in a sex-dependent fashion. Stress 21:333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2018.1456525 pmid:29607713
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Cannady R, Nimitvilai-Roberts S, Jennings SD, Woodward JJ, Mulholland PJ (2020) Distinct region- and time-dependent functional cortical adaptations in C57BL/6J mice after short and prolonged alcohol drinking. eNeuro 7:ENEURO.0077-20.2020. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0077-20.2020
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Cao J, Liu X, Liu JX, Zhao S, Guo YX, Wang GY, Wang XL (2022) Inhibition of glutamatergic neurons in layer II/III of the medial prefrontal cortex alleviates paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain and anxiety. Eur J Pharmacol 936:175351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175351 pmid:36309050
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Carlson JM, Depetro E, Maxwell J, Harmon-Jones E, Hajcak G (2015) Gender moderates the association between dorsal medial prefrontal cortex volume and depressive symptoms in a subclinical sample. Psychiatry Res 233:285–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.06.005 pmid:26166620
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Carnicella S, Amamoto R, Ron D (2009) Excessive alcohol consumption is blocked by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor. Alcohol 43:35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2008.12.001 pmid:19185208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Chang P, Fabrizi L, Fitzgerald M (2022) Early life pain experience changes adult functional pain connectivity in the rat somatosensory and the medial prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 42:8284–8296. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0416-22.2022 pmid:36192150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Chen AC, Manz N, Tang Y, Rangaswamy M, Almasy L, Kuperman S, Nurnberger J Jr., O’Connor SJ, Edenberg HJ, Schuckit MA, Tischfield J, Foroud T, Bierut LJ, Rohrbaugh J, Rice JP, Goate A, Hesselbrock V, Porjesz B (2010) Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in corticotropin releasing hormone receptor 1 gene (CRHR1) are associated with quantitative trait of event-related potential and alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 34:988–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01173.x pmid:20374216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Chen Y, Hu N, Yang J, Gao T (2022) Prefrontal cortical circuits in anxiety and fear: an overview. Front Med 16:518–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11684-022-0941-2 pmid:35943704
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    Choi NG, DiNitto DM (2011) Psychological distress, binge/heavy drinking, and gender differences among older adults. Am J Addict 20:420–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2011.00149.x pmid:21838840
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Chou KL, Cacioppo JT, Kumari M, Song YQ (2014) Influence of social environment on loneliness in older adults: moderation by polymorphism in the CRHR1. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 22:510–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.002 pmid:23933425
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Cippitelli A, Damadzic R, Singley E, Thorsell A, Ciccocioppo R, Eskay RL, Heilig M (2012) Pharmacological blockade of corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRH1R) reduces voluntary consumption of high alcohol concentrations in non-dependent Wistar rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 100:522–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2011.10.016 pmid:22036774
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Correia D, Ribeiro AF, Brunialti Godard AL, Boerngen-Lacerda R (2009) Trait anxiety and ethanol: anxiolysis in high-anxiety mice and no relation to intake behavior in an addiction model. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33:880–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.04.015 pmid:19394387
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Dang R, Wang M, Li X, Wang H, Liu L, Wu Q, Zhao J, Ji P, Zhong L, Licinio J, Xie P (2022) Edaravone ameliorates depressive and anxiety-like behaviors via Sirt1/Nrf2/HO-1/Gpx4 pathway. J Neuroinflammation 19:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-022-02400-6 pmid:35130906
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Da Silva GE, Ramos A, Takahashi RN (2004) Comparison of voluntary ethanol intake by two pairs of rat lines used as genetic models of anxiety. Braz J Med Biol Res 37:1511–1517. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2004001000010 pmid:15448872
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    David DJ, Samuels BA, Rainer Q, Wang JW, Marsteller D, Mendez I, Drew M, Craig DA, Guiard BP, Guilloux JP, Artymyshyn RP, Gardier AM, Gerald C, Antonijevic IA, Leonardo ED, Hen R (2009) Neurogenesis-dependent and -independent effects of fluoxetine in an animal model of anxiety/depression. Neuron 62:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.04.017 pmid:19477151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Dong D, Belleau EL, Ironside M, Zhong X, Sun X, Xiong G, Cheng C, Li C, Wang X, Yao S, Pizzagalli DA (2022) Distinct stress-related medial prefrontal cortex activation in women with depression with and without childhood maltreatment. Depress Anxiety 39:296–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23243 pmid:35072959
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    De Oliveira Sergio T, Wetherill L, Kwok C, Khoyloo F, Hopf FW (2021) Sex differences in specific aspects of two animal tests of anxiety-like behavior. Psychopharmacology 238:2775–2787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05893-w
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    Edwards S, Vendruscolo LF, Schlosburg JE, Misra KK, Wee S, Park PE, Schulteis G, Koob GF (2012) Development of mechanical hypersensitivity in rats during heroin and ethanol dependence: alleviation by CRF(1) receptor antagonism. Neuropharmacology 62:1142–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.11.006 pmid:22119954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Enayati M, Mosaferi B, Homberg JR, Diniz DM, Salari AA (2020) Prenatal maternal stress alters depression-related symptoms in a strain - and sex-dependent manner in rodent offspring. Life Sci 251:117597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117597 pmid:32243926
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    Engel DF, de Oliveira J, Lopes JB, Santos DB, Moreira ELG, Farina M, Rodrigues ALS, de Souza Brocardo P, de Bem AF (2016) Is there an association between hypercholesterolemia and depression? Behavioral evidence from the LDLr(-/-) mouse experimental model. Behav Brain Res 311:31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.05.029 pmid:27185735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Faccidomo S, Reid GT, Agoglia AE, Ademola SA, Hodge CW (2016) CaMKII inhibition in the prefrontal cortex specifically increases the positive reinforcing effects of sweetened alcohol in C57BL/6J mice. Behav Brain Res 298:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.11.018 pmid:26608538
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    Faria MP, Miguel TT, Gomes KS, Nunes-de-Souza RL (2016) Anxiety-like responses induced by nitric oxide within the BNST in mice: role of CRF1 and NMDA receptors. Horm Behav 79:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.01.002 pmid:26774463
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Fish KN, Joffe ME (2022) Targeting prefrontal cortex GABAergic microcircuits for the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Front Synaptic Neurosci 14:936911. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2022.936911 pmid:36105666
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    Flores-Ramirez FJ, Matzeu A, Sánchez-Marín L, Martin-Fardon R (2022) Blockade of corticotropin-releasing factor-1 receptors in the infralimbic cortex prevents stress-induced reinstatement of alcohol seeking in male Wistar rats: evidence of interaction between CRF1 and orexin receptor signaling. Neuropharmacology 210:109046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109046 pmid:35341789
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    Franceschini A, Fattore L (2021) Gender-specific approach in psychiatric diseases: because sex matters. Eur J Pharmacol 896:173895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.173895 pmid:33508283
    OpenUrlPubMed
  51. ↵
    Francesconi W, Berton F, Repunte-Canonigo V, Hagihara K, Thurbon D, Lekic D, Specio SE, Greenwell TN, Chen SA, Rice KC, Richardson HN, O’Dell LE, Zorrilla EP, Morales M, Koob GF, Sanna PP (2009) Protracted withdrawal from alcohol and drugs of abuse impairs long-term potentiation of intrinsic excitability in the juxtacapsular bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. J Neurosci 29:5389–5401. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5129-08.2009 pmid:19403807
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Francis-Oliveira J, Ponte B, Barbosa AP, Veríssimo LF, Gomes MV, Pelosi GG, Britto LR, Moreira EG (2013) Fluoxetine exposure during pregnancy and lactation: effects on acute stress response and behavior in the novelty-suppressed feeding are age and gender-dependent in rats. Behav Brain Res 252:195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.064 pmid:23764459
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    Friard O, Gamba M (2016) BORIS: a free, versatile open-source event-logging software for video/audio coding and live observations. Methods Ecol Evol 7:1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12584
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    Geng KW, He T, Wang RR, Li CL, Luo WJ, Wu FF, Wang Y, Li Z, Lu YF, Guan SM, Chen J (2016) Ethanol increases mechanical pain sensitivity in rats via activation of GABAA receptors in medial prefrontal cortex. Neurosci Bull 32:433–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-016-0063-4 pmid:27628528
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Genn RF, Tucci SA, Thomas A, Edwards JE, File SE (2003) Age-associated sex differences in response to food deprivation in two animal tests of anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00017-4 pmid:12732231
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    George O, Sanders C, Freiling J, Grigoryan E, Vu S, Allen CD, Crawford E, Mandyam CD, Koob GF (2012) Recruitment of medial prefrontal cortex neurons during alcohol withdrawal predicts cognitive impairment and excessive alcohol drinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:18156–18161. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116523109 pmid:23071333
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Goes TC, Antunes FD, Teixeira-Silva F (2015) Environmental enrichment for adult rats: effects on trait and state anxiety. Neurosci Lett 584:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.10.004 pmid:25316162
    OpenUrlPubMed
  58. ↵
    Gomez JL, Lewis MJ, Sebastian V, Serrano P, Luine VN (2013) Alcohol administration blocks stress-induced impairments in memory and anxiety, and alters hippocampal neurotransmitter receptor expression in male rats. Horm Behav 63:659–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2013.01.007 pmid:23376488
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    Gong MF, Wen RT, Xu Y, Pan JC, Fei N, Zhou YM, Xu JP, Liang JH, Zhang HT (2017) Attenuation of ethanol abstinence-induced anxiety- and depressive-like behavior by the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor rolipram in rodents. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 234:3143–3151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-017-4697-3 pmid:28748375
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    Gozzi A, Lepore S, Vicentini E, Merlo-Pich E, Bifone A (2013) Differential effect of orexin-1 and CRF-1 antagonism on stress circuits: a fMRI study in the rat with the pharmacological stressor Yohimbine. Neuropsychopharmacology 38:2120–2130. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.109 pmid:23736277
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    Grabe HJ, Schwahn C, Appel K, Mahler J, Schulz A, Spitzer C, Fenske K, Barnow S, Lucht M, Freyberger HJ, John U, Teumer A, Wallaschofski H, Nauck M, Völzke H (2010) Childhood maltreatment, the corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor gene and adult depression in the general population. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 153B:1483–1493. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31131 pmid:20957648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    Grant BF, Chou SP, Saha TD, Pickering RP, Kerridge BT, Ruan WJ, Huang B, Jung J, Zhang H, Fan A, Hasin DS (2017) Prevalence of 12-month alcohol use, high-risk drinking, and DSM-IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001-2002 to 2012-2013: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. JAMA Psychiatry 74:911–923. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2161 pmid:28793133
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    Grucza RA, Sher KJ, Kerr WC, Krauss MJ, Lui CK, McDowell YE, Hartz S, Virdi G, Bierut LJ (2018) Trends in adult alcohol use and binge drinking in the early 21st-century United States: a meta-analysis of 6 national survey series. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 42:1939–1950. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13859 pmid:30080258
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    Haj-Mirzaian A, Amiri S, Kordjazy N, Momeny M, Razmi A, Rahimi-Balaei M, Amini-Khoei H, Haj-Mirzaian A, Marzban H, Mehr SE, Ghaffari SH, Dehpour AR (2016) Lithium attenuated the depressant and anxiogenic effect of juvenile social stress through mitigating the negative impact of interlukin-1β and nitric oxide on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. Neuroscience 315:271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.12.024 pmid:26708749
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    Hansson AC, Cippitelli A, Sommer WH, Fedeli A, Björk K, Soverchia L, Terasmaa A, Massi M, Heilig M, Ciccocioppo R (2006) Variation at the rat Crhr1 locus and sensitivity to relapse into alcohol seeking induced by environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:15236–15241. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604419103 pmid:17015825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    Hare BD, Duman RS (2020) Prefrontal cortex circuits in depression and anxiety: contribution of discrete neuronal populations and target regions. Mol Psychiatry 25:2742–2758. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0685-9 pmid:32086434
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    Hayen A, Meese-Tamuri S, Gates A, Ito R (2014) Opposing roles of prelimbic and infralimbic dopamine in conditioned cue and place preference. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 231:2483–2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-013-3414-0 pmid:24429871
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    Hayton SJ, Mahoney MK, Olmstead MC (2012) Behavioral traits predicting alcohol drinking in outbred rats: an investigation of anxiety, novelty seeking, and cognitive flexibility. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 36:594–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01668.x pmid:22004189
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    Henniger MS, Spanagel R, Wigger A, Landgraf R, Hölter SM (2002) Alcohol self-administration in two rat lines selectively bred for extremes in anxiety-related behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 26:729–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00408-0 pmid:12007743
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    Holter SM, Engelmann M, Kirschke C, Liebsch G, Landgraf R, Spanagel R (1998) Long-term ethanol self-administration with repeated ethanol deprivation episodes changes ethanol drinking pattern and increases anxiety-related behaviour during ethanol deprivation in rats. Behav Pharmacol 9:41–48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    Horiguchi N, Ago Y, Hasebe S, Higashino K, Asada K, Kita Y, Takuma K, Matsuda T (2013) Isolation rearing reduces mechanical allodynia in a mouse model of chronic inflammatory pain. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 113:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.10.017 pmid:24161684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    Houlé K, Abdi M, Clabough EBD (2017) Acute ethanol exposure during late mouse neurodevelopment results in long-term deficits in memory retrieval, but not in social responsiveness. Brain Behav 7:e00636. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.636 pmid:28413697
    OpenUrlPubMed
  73. ↵
    Howe LK, Fisher LR, Atkinson EA, Finn PR (2021) Symptoms of anxiety, depression, and borderline personality in alcohol use disorder with and without comorbid substance use disorder. Alcohol 90:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2020.11.002 pmid:33232791
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    Hu C, Luo Y, Wang H, Kuang S, Liang G, Yang Y, Mai S, Yang J (2017) Re-evaluation of the interrelationships among the behavioral tests in rats exposed to chronic unpredictable mild stress. PLoS One 12:e0185129. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185129 pmid:28931086
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    Hu Y, Dong F, Xue T, Zhou M, Huang R, Sui F, Guo Q, Hou W, Cai W, Yuan K, Wang H, Yu D (2023) Glutamate levels in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and resting-state functional connectivity within reward circuits in alcohol-dependent patients. Addict Biol 28:e13272. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.13272 pmid:37016753
    OpenUrlPubMed
  76. ↵
    Huang MM, Overstreet DH, Knapp DJ, Angel R, Wills TA, Navarro M, Rivier J, Vale W, Breese GR (2010) Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) sensitization of ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior is brain site specific and mediated by CRF-1 receptors: relation to stress-induced sensitization. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 332:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.109.159186 pmid:19843974
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    Huang S, Borgland SL, Zamponi GW (2019) Dopaminergic modulation of pain signals in the medial prefrontal cortex: challenges and perspectives. Neurosci Lett 702:71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.11.043 pmid:30503912
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    Huang S, Zhang Z, Gambeta E, Xu SC, Thomas C, Godfrey N, Chen L, M’Dahoma S, Borgland SL, Zamponi GW (2020) Dopamine inputs from the ventral tegmental area into the medial prefrontal cortex modulate neuropathic pain-associated behaviors in mice. Cell Rep 31:107812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107812 pmid:32579938
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    Hubbard CS, Labus JS, Bueller J, Stains J, Suyenobu B, Dukes GE, Kelleher DL, Tillisch K, Naliboff BD, Mayer EA (2011) Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 antagonist alters regional activation and effective connectivity in an emotional-arousal circuit during expectation of abdominal pain. J Neurosci 31:12491–12500. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-11.2011 pmid:21880911
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    Hughes BA, Bohnsack JP, O’Buckley TK, Herman MA, Morrow AL (2019) Chronic ethanol exposure and withdrawal impair synaptic GABAA receptor-mediated neurotransmission in deep-layer prefrontal cortex. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 43:822–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14015 pmid:30860602
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    Hughes BA, Crofton EJ, O’Buckley TK, Herman MA, Morrow AL (2020) Chronic ethanol exposure alters prelimbic prefrontal cortical fast-spiking and Martinotti interneuron function with differential sex specificity in rat brain. Neuropharmacology 162:107805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2019.107805 pmid:31589884
    OpenUrlPubMed
  82. ↵
    Hughes BA, O’Buckley TK, Boero G, Herman MA, Morrow AL (2021) Sex- and subtype-specific adaptations in excitatory signaling onto deep-layer prelimbic cortical pyramidal neurons after chronic alcohol exposure. Neuropsychopharmacology 46:1927–1936. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01034-1 pmid:34035471
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. ↵
    Ide S, Hara T, Ohno A, Tamano R, Koseki K, Naka T, Maruyama C, Kaneda K, Yoshioka M, Minami M (2013) Opposing roles of corticotropin-releasing factor and neuropeptide Y within the dorsolateral bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the negative affective component of pain in rats. J Neurosci 33:5881–5894. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4278-12.2013 pmid:23554470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    Iijima M, Fukumoto K, Chaki S (2012) Acute and sustained effects of a metabotropic glutamate 5 receptor antagonist in the novelty-suppressed feeding test. Behav Brain Res 235:287–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.016 pmid:22921929
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    Isingrini E, Camus V, Le Guisquet AM, Pingaud M, Devers S, Belzung C (2010) Association between repeated unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) procedures with a high fat diet: a model of fluoxetine resistance in mice. PLoS One 5:e10404. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010404 pmid:20436931
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    Izídio GS, Ramos A (2007) Positive association between ethanol consumption and anxiety-related behaviors in two selected rat lines. Alcohol 41:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2007.07.008 pmid:17980788
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    Jacobs DS, Moghaddam B (2021) Medial prefrontal cortex encoding of stress and anxiety. Int Rev Neurobiol 158:29–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2020.11.014 pmid:33785149
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. ↵
    Jefferson T, Kelly CJ, Martina M (2021) Differential rearrangement of excitatory inputs to the medial prefrontal cortex in chronic pain models. Front Neural Circuits 15:791043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2021.791043 pmid:35002635
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    Ji G, Fu Y, Ruppert KA, Neugebauer V (2007) Pain-related anxiety-like behavior requires CRF1 receptors in the amygdala. Mol Pain 3:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-3-13 pmid:17550594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    Jiang M, Chen X, Zhang L, Liu W, Yu X, Wang Z, Zheng M (2021) Electroacupuncture suppresses glucose metabolism and GLUT-3 expression in medial prefrontal cortical in rats with neuropathic pain. Biol Res 54:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-021-00348-0 pmid:34362470
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    Johnson S, Duncan J, Hussain SA, Chen G, Luo J, Mclaurin C, May W, Rajkowska G, Ou XM, Stockmeier CA, Wang JM (2015) The IFNγ-PKR pathway in the prefrontal cortex reactions to chronic excessive alcohol use. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 39:476–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12650 pmid:25704249
    OpenUrlPubMed
  92. ↵
    Junqueira-Ayres DD, Asth L, Ayres AS, Lobão-Soares B, Soares-Rachetti VP, Gavioli EC (2017) Topiramate reduces basal anxiety and relieves ethanol withdrawal-induced anxious behaviors in male rats. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 25:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000118 pmid:28287793
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    Kambur O, Männistö PT, Viljakka K, Reenilä I, Lemberg K, Kontinen VK, Karayiorgou M, Gogos JA, Kalso E (2008) Stress-induced analgesia and morphine responses are changed in catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient male mice. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 103:367–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2008.00289.x pmid:18834357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    Kang D, Hesam-Shariati N, McAuley JH, Alam M, Trost Z, Rae CD, Gustin SM (2021) Disruption to normal excitatory and inhibitory function within the medial prefrontal cortex in people with chronic pain. Eur J Pain 25:2242–2256. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1838 pmid:34242465
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    Kang D, McAuley JH, Kassem MS, Gatt JM, Gustin SM (2019a) What does the grey matter decrease in the medial prefrontal cortex reflect in people with chronic pain? Eur J Pain 23:203–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1304 pmid:30101509
    OpenUrlPubMed
  96. ↵
    Kang S, Li J, Zuo W, Chen P, Gregor D, Fu R, Han X, Bekker A, Ye JH (2019b) Downregulation of M-channels in lateral habenula mediates hyperalgesia during alcohol withdrawal in rats. Sci Rep 9:2714. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38393-7 pmid:30804373
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    Keck ME, Kern N, Erhardt A, Unschuld PG, Ising M, Salyakina D, Müller MB, Knorr CC, Lieb R, Hohoff C, Krakowitzky P, Maier W, Bandelow B, Fritze J, Deckert J, Holsboer F, Müller-Myhsok B, Binder EB (2008) Combined effects of exonic polymorphisms in CRHR1 and AVPR1B genes in a case/control study for panic disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 147B:1196–1204. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30750 pmid:18384079
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    Keledjian K, Tsymbalyuk O, Semick S, Moyer M, Negoita S, Kim K, Ivanova S, Gerzanich V, Simard JM (2020) The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonist, rosiglitazone, ameliorates neurofunctional and neuroinflammatory abnormalities in a rat model of Gulf War Illness. PLoS One 15:e0242427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242427 pmid:33186383
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    Kenwood MM, Kalin NH, Barbas H (2022) The prefrontal cortex, pathological anxiety, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 47:260–275. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-021-01109-z pmid:34400783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    Keyes KM, Platt J, Rutherford C, Patrick ME, Kloska DD, Schulenberg J, Jager J (2021) Cohort effects on gender differences in alcohol use in the United States: how much is explained by changing attitudes towards women and gendered roles? SSM Popul Health 15:100919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100919 pmid:34541283
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    Kimbrough A, Kim S, Cole M, Brennan M, George O (2017) Intermittent access to ethanol drinking facilitates the transition to excessive drinking after chronic intermittent ethanol vapor exposure. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 41:1502–1509. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13434 pmid:28679148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    Klein J, Winter C, Coquery N, Heinz A, Morgenstern R, Kupsch A, Juckel G (2010) Lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex and the subthalamic nucleus selectively affect depression-like behavior in rats. Behav Brain Res 213:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.036 pmid:20434489
    OpenUrlPubMed
  103. ↵
    Knapp DJ, Overstreet DH, Huang M, Wills TA, Whitman BA, Angel RA, Sinnett SE, Breese GR (2011) Effects of a stressor and corticotrophin releasing factor on ethanol deprivation-induced ethanol intake and anxiety-like behavior in alcohol-preferring P rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 218:179–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2366-5 pmid:21643675
    OpenUrlPubMed
  104. ↵
    Kononoff J, Kallupi M, Kimbrough A, Conlisk D, de Guglielmo G, George O (2018) Systemic and intra-habenular activation of the orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR139 decreases compulsive-like alcohol drinking and hyperalgesia in alcohol-dependent rats. eNeuro 5:ENEURO.0153-18.2018. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0153-18.2018
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    Koob GF (2010) The role of CRF and CRF-related peptides in the dark side of addiction. Brain Res 1314:3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.11.008 pmid:19912996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    Koob GF, Le Moal M (2005) Neurobiology of addiction. San Diego: Academic Press.
  107. ↵
    Kranzler HR, Feinn R, Nelson EC, Covault J, Anton RF, Farrer L, Gelernter J (2011) A CRHR1 haplotype moderates the effect of adverse childhood experiences on lifetime risk of major depressive episode in African-American women. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 156B:960–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.31243 pmid:21998007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    Kreifeldt M, Herman MA, Sidhu H, Okhuarobo A, Macedo GC, Shahryari R, Gandhi PJ, Roberto M, Contet C (2022) Central amygdala corticotropin-releasing factor neurons promote hyponeophagia but do not control alcohol drinking in mice. Mol Psychiatry 27:2502–2513. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-022-01496-9 pmid:35264727
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. ↵
    Kummer KK, Mitric M, Kalpachidou T, Kress M (2020) The medial prefrontal cortex as a central hub for mental comorbidities associated with chronic pain. Int J Mol Sci 21:3440.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  110. ↵
    Kurrikoff K, Inno J, Matsui T, Vasar E (2008) Stress-induced analgesia in mice: evidence for interaction between endocannabinoids and cholecystokinin. Eur J Neurosci 27:2147–2155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06160.x pmid:18412633
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    Kushner MG, Maurer E, Menary K, Thuras P (2011) Vulnerability to the rapid (“telescoped”) development of alcohol dependence in individuals with anxiety disorder. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 72:1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2011.72.1019 pmid:22051216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    Land C, Spear NE (2004) Ethanol impairs memory of a simple discrimination in adolescent rats at doses that leave adult memory unaffected. Neurobiol Learn Mem 81:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2003.08.005 pmid:14670361
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    Lawson K, Scarlata MJ, Cho WC, Mangan C, Petersen D, Thompson HM, Ehnstrom S, Mousley AL, Bezek JL, Bergstrom HC (2022) Adolescence alcohol exposure impairs fear extinction and alters medial prefrontal cortex plasticity. Neuropharmacology 211:109048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109048 pmid:35364101
    OpenUrlPubMed
  114. ↵
    Lee KM, Coelho MA, McGregor HA, Solton NR, Cohen M, Szumlinski KK (2016) Adolescent mice are resilient to alcohol withdrawal-induced anxiety and changes in indices of glutamate function within the nucleus accumbens. Front Cell Neurosci 10:265. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2016.00265 pmid:27917110
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    Lee KM, Coehlo MA, Solton NR, Szumlinski KK (2017) Negative affect and excessive alcohol intake incubate during protracted withdrawal from binge-drinking in adolescent, but not adult, mice. Front Psychol 8:1128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01128 pmid:28729845
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. ↵
    Leggio L, Falk DE, Ryan ML, Fertig J, Litten RZ (2020) Medication development for alcohol use disorder: a focus on clinical studies. Handb Exp Pharmacol 258:443–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2019_295 pmid:31628604
    OpenUrlPubMed
  117. ↵
    Lenglos C, Mitra A, Guèvremont G, Timofeeva E (2013) Sex differences in the effects of chronic stress and food restriction on body weight gain and brain expression of CRF and relaxin-3 in rats. Genes Brain Behav 12:370–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12028 pmid:23425370
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    Lieberknecht V, Cunha MP, Junqueira SC, Coelho ID, de Souza LF, Dos Santos AR, Rodrigues AL, Dutra RC, Dafre AL (2017) Antidepressant-like effect of pramipexole in an inflammatory model of depression. Behav Brain Res 320:365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.007 pmid:27825895
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    Linsenbardt DN, Lapish CC (2015) Neural firing in the prefrontal cortex during alcohol intake in alcohol-preferring “P” versus Wistar rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 39:1642–1653. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12804 pmid:26250465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. ↵
    Litvin Y, Pentkowski NS, Blanchard DC, Blanchard RJ (2007) CRF type 1 receptors in the dorsal periaqueductal gray modulate anxiety-induced defensive behaviors. Horm Behav 52:244–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.04.012 pmid:17540371
    OpenUrlPubMed
  121. ↵
    Liu J, Guo M, Lu XY (2015) Leptin/LepRb in the ventral tegmental area mediates anxiety-related behaviors. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 19:pyv115.
    OpenUrl
  122. ↵
    Liu S, Zhao Z, Guo Y, Shu H, Li C, Tang Y, Xing Y, Tao F (2018) Spinal AMPA receptor GluA1 Ser831 phosphorylation controls chronic alcohol consumption-produced prolongation of postsurgical pain. Mol Neurobiol 55:4090–4097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-017-0639-7 pmid:28585190
    OpenUrlPubMed
  123. ↵
    Lopez MF, Becker HC (2005) Effect of pattern and number of chronic ethanol exposures on subsequent voluntary ethanol intake in C57BL/6J mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 181:688–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-0026-3 pmid:16001125
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    Lowery EG, Spanos M, Navarro M, Lyons AM, Hodge CW, Thiele TE (2010) CRF-1 antagonist and CRF-2 agonist decrease binge-like ethanol drinking in C57BL/6J mice independent of the HPA axis. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.209 pmid:20130533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  125. ↵
    Lu YL, Richardson HN (2014) Alcohol, stress hormones, and the prefrontal cortex: a proposed pathway to the dark side of addiction. Neuroscience 277:139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.053 pmid:24998895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  126. ↵
    Malvestio RB, Medeiros P, Negrini-Ferrari SE, Oliveira-Silva M, Medeiros AC, Padovan CM, Luongo L, Maione S, Coimbra NC, de Freitas RL (2021) Cannabidiol in the prelimbic cortex modulates the comorbid condition between the chronic neuropathic pain and depression-like behaviour in rats: the role of medial prefrontal cortex 5-HT1A and CB1 receptors. Brain Res Bull 174:323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2021.06.017 pmid:34192579
    OpenUrlPubMed
  127. ↵
    Martinotti G, Di Nicola M, Reina D, Andreoli S, Focà F, Cunniff A, Tonioni F, Bria P, Janiri L (2008) Alcohol protracted withdrawal syndrome: the role of anhedonia. Subst Use Misuse 43:271–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080701202429 pmid:18365930
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. ↵
    McHugh RK, Weiss RD (2019) Alcohol use disorder and depressive disorders. Alcohol Res 40:arcr.v40.1.01. https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v40.1.01
    OpenUrl
  129. ↵
    Mckinzie DL, Sajdyk TJ, Mcbride WJ, Murphy JM, Lumeng L, Li TK, Shekhar A (2000) Acoustic startle and fear-potentiated startle in alcohol-preferring (P) and -nonpreferring (NP) lines of rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 65:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00252-x pmid:10764924
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  130. ↵
    McNamara TA, Ito R (2021) Relationship between voluntary ethanol drinking and approach-avoidance biases in the face of motivational conflict: novel sex-dependent associations in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 238:1817–1832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05810-1 pmid:33783557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. ↵
    Mecca CM, Chao D, Yu G, Feng Y, Segel I, Zhang Z, Rodriguez-Garcia DM, Pawela CP, Hillard CJ, Hogan QH, Pan B (2021) Dynamic change of endocannabinoid signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex controls the development of depression after neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 41:7492–7508. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3135-20.2021 pmid:34244365
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  132. ↵
    Miguel TT, Nunes-de-Souza RL (2011) Anxiogenic and antinociceptive effects induced by corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) injections into the periaqueductal gray are modulated by CRF1 receptor in mice. Horm Behav 60:292–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.06.004 pmid:21723867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  133. ↵
    Moench KM, Logrip ML (2021) Housing condition differentially impacts escalation of alcohol intake, relapse-like drinking, anxiety-like behavior, and stress history effects by sex. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 45:480–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14540 pmid:33351976
    OpenUrlPubMed
  134. ↵
    Momeni S, Roman E (2014) Subgroup-dependent effects of voluntary alcohol intake on behavioral profiles in outbred Wistar rats. Behav Brain Res 275:288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.08.058 pmid:25200519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    Murrough JW, Abdallah CG, Anticevic A, Collins KA, Geha P, Averill LA, Schwartz J, DeWilde KE, Averill C, Jia-Wei Yang G, Wong E, Tang CY, Krystal JH, Iosifescu DV, Charney DS (2016) Reduced global functional connectivity of the medial prefrontal cortex in major depressive disorder. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3214–3223. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23235 pmid:27144347
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    Myers-Schulz B, Koenigs M (2012) Functional anatomy of ventromedial prefrontal cortex: implications for mood and anxiety disorders. Mol Psychiatry 17:132–141. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.88 pmid:21788943
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    Natividad LA, Buczynski MW, Herman MA, Kirson D, Oleata CS, Irimia C, Polis I, Ciccocioppo R, Roberto M, Parsons LH (2017) Constitutive increases in amygdalar corticotropin-releasing factor and fatty acid amide hydrolase drive an anxious phenotype. Biol Psychiatry 82:500–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.01.005 pmid:28209423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. ↵
    Natividad LA, Steinman MQ, Laredo SA, Irimia C, Polis IY, Lintz R, Buczynski MW, Martin-Fardon R, Roberto M, Parsons LH (2018) Phosphorylation of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in the rat dorsal medial prefrontal cortex is associated with alcohol-induced cognitive inflexibility. Addict Biol 23:1117–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/adb.12568 pmid:28940879
    OpenUrlPubMed
  139. ↵
    Naylor B, Hesam-Shariati N, McAuley JH, Boag S, Newton-John T, Rae CD, Gustin SM (2019) Reduced glutamate in the medial prefrontal cortex is associated with emotional and cognitive dysregulation in people with chronic pain. Front Neurol 10:1110. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01110 pmid:31849800
    OpenUrlPubMed
  140. ↵
    Neira S, Hassanein LA, Stanhope CM, Buccini MC, D’Ambrosio SL, Flanigan ME, Haun HL, Boyt KM, Bains JS, Kash TL (2022) Chronic alcohol consumption alters home-cage behaviors and responses to ethologically relevant predator tasks in mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 46:1616–1629. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14901 pmid:35797227
    OpenUrlPubMed
  141. ↵
    Nennig SE, Fulenwider HD, Eskew JE, Whiting KE, Cotton MR, McGinty GE, Solomon MG, Schank JR (2020) Intermittent ethanol access increases sensitivity to social defeat stress. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 44:600–610. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14278 pmid:31957041
    OpenUrlPubMed
  142. ↵
    Nie X, Kitaoka S, Tanaka K, Segi-Nishida E, Imoto Y, Ogawa A, Nakano F, Tomohiro A, Nakayama K, Taniguchi M, Mimori-Kiyosue Y, Kakizuka A, Narumiya S, Furuyashiki T (2018) The innate immune receptors TLR2/4 mediate repeated social defeat stress-induced social avoidance through prefrontal microglial activation. Neuron 99:464–479.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.06.035 pmid:30033154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    Nishinaka T, Nakamoto K, Tokuyama S (2015) Enhancement of nerve-injury-induced thermal and mechanical hypersensitivity in adult male and female mice following early life stress. Life Sci 121:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2014.11.012 pmid:25476827
    OpenUrlPubMed
  144. ↵
    Nowland MH, Hugunin KM, Rogers KL (2011) Effects of short-term fasting in male Sprague-Dawley rats. 61:138–144.
  145. ↵
    Olenick NL, Chalmers DK (1991) Gender-specific drinking styles in alcoholics and nonalcoholics. J Stud Alcohol 52:325–330. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1991.52.325 pmid:1875705
    OpenUrlPubMed
  146. ↵
    Ong WY, Stohler CS, Herr DR (2019) Role of the prefrontal cortex in pain processing. Mol Neurobiol 56:1137–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-018-1130-9 pmid:29876878
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. ↵
    Overstreet DH, Knapp DJ, Breese GR (2004) Modulation of multiple ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior by CRF and CRF1 receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 77:405–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2003.11.010 pmid:14751471
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    Overstreet DH, Knapp DJ, Breese GR (2005) Pharmacological modulation of repeated ethanol withdrawal-induced anxiety-like behavior differs in alcohol-preferring P and Sprague-Dawley rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 81:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2005.03.006 pmid:15894069
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. ↵
    Pahng AR, Paulsen RI, McGinn MA, Edwards KN, Edwards S (2017) Neurobiological correlates of pain avoidance-like behavior in morphine-dependent and non-dependent rats. Neuroscience 366:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.055 pmid:29024786
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  150. ↵
    Papasideris M, Ayaz H, Hall PA (2021) Medial prefrontal brain activity correlates with emerging symptoms of anxiety and depression in late adolescence: a fNIRS study. Dev Psychobiol 63:e22199. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22199 pmid:34674240
    OpenUrlPubMed
  151. ↵
    Patel RR, Wolfe SA, Borgonetti V, Gandhi PJ, Rodriguez L, Snyder AE, D’Ambrosio S, Bajo M, Domissy A, Head S, Contet C, Dayne Mayfield R, Roberts AJ, Roberto M (2022) Ethanol withdrawal-induced adaptations in prefrontal corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1-expressing neurons regulate anxiety and conditioned rewarding effects of ethanol. Mol Psychiatry 27:3441–3451.
    OpenUrl
  152. ↵
    Paxinos G, Watson C (2007) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates: hard cover edition. New York: Elsevier Science.
  153. ↵
    Pelloux Y, Costentin J, Duterte-Boucher D (2015) Differential involvement of anxiety and novelty preference levels on oral ethanol consumption in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 232:2711–2721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3910-5 pmid:25761842
    OpenUrlPubMed
  154. ↵
    Perlaki G, Orsi G, Schwarcz A, Bodi P, Plozer E, Biczo K, Aradi M, Doczi T, Komoly S, Hejjel L, Kovacs N, Janszky J (2015) Pain-related autonomic response is modulated by the medial prefrontal cortex: an ECG-fMRI study in men. J Neurol Sci 349:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.01.019 pmid:25623806
    OpenUrlPubMed
  155. ↵
    Pfarr S, Meinhardt MW, Klee ML, Hansson AC, Vengeliene V, Schönig K, Bartsch D, Hope BT, Spanagel R, Sommer WH (2015) Losing control: excessive alcohol seeking after selective inactivation of cue-responsive neurons in the infralimbic cortex. J Neurosci 35:10750–10761. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0684-15.2015 pmid:26224858
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  156. ↵
    Price RB, Duman R (2020) Neuroplasticity in cognitive and psychological mechanisms of depression: an integrative model. Mol Psychiatry 25:530–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0615-x pmid:31801966
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  157. ↵
    Priddy BM, Carmack SA, Thomas LC, Vendruscolo JC, Koob GF, Vendruscolo LF (2017) Sex, strain, and estrous cycle influences on alcohol drinking in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 152:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2016.08.001 pmid:27498303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  158. ↵
    Prvulovic M, Todorovic S, Milanovic D, Jovic M, Vujovic P, Kanazir S, Mladenovic A (2022) Calorie restriction changes the anxiety-like behaviour of ageing male Wistar rats in an onset- and duration-dependent manner. Mech Ageing Dev 204:111666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mad.2022.111666 pmid:35331743
    OpenUrlPubMed
  159. ↵
    Quadir SG, Tanino SM, Sami YN, Minnig MA, Iyer MR, Rice KC, Cottone P, Sabino V (2021) Antagonism of Sigma-1 receptor blocks heavy alcohol drinking and associated hyperalgesia in male mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 45:1398–1407. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14635 pmid:34060104
    OpenUrlPubMed
  160. ↵
    Quadir SG, Arleth GM, Jahad JV, Echeveste Sanchez M, Effinger DP, Herman MA (2022) Sex differences in affective states and association with voluntary ethanol intake in Sprague-Dawley rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 239:589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-06052-x pmid:35044485
    OpenUrlPubMed
  161. ↵
    Raisian D, Erfanparast A, Tamaddonfard E, Soltanalinejad-Taghiabad F (2022) Medial prefrontal cortex nitric oxide modulates neuropathic pain behavior through mu opioid receptors in rats. Korean J Pain 35:413–422. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2022.35.4.413 pmid:36175340
    OpenUrlPubMed
  162. ↵
    Rieger NS, Varela JA, Ng AG, Granata L, Djerdjaj A, Brenhouse HC, Christianson JP (2022) Insular cortex corticotropin-releasing factor integrates stress signaling with social affective behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 47:1156–1168.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  163. ↵
    Rimondini R, Sommer W, Heilig M (2003) A temporal threshold for induction of persistent alcohol preference: behavioral evidence in a rat model of intermittent intoxication. J Stud Alcohol 64:445–449. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2003.64.445 pmid:12921185
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  164. ↵
    Rinker JA, Marshall SA, Mazzone CM, Lowery-Gionta EG, Gulati V, Pleil KE, Kash TL, Navarro M, Thiele TE (2017) Extended amygdala to ventral tegmental area corticotropin-releasing factor circuit controls binge ethanol intake. Biol Psychiatry 81:930–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.02.029 pmid:27113502
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  165. ↵
    Ririe DG, Eisenach JC (2006) Age-dependent responses to nerve injury-induced mechanical allodynia. Anesthesiology 104:344–350. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200602000-00021 pmid:16436855
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  166. ↵
    Robinson SL, Perez-Heydrich CA, Thiele TE (2019) Corticotropin releasing factor type 1 and 2 receptor signaling in the medial prefrontal cortex modulates binge-like ethanol consumption in C57BL/6J mice. Brain Sciences 9:171. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9070171
    OpenUrl
  167. ↵
    Rodriguez L, Kirson D, Wolfe SA, Patel RR, Varodayan FP, Snyder AE, Gandhi PJ, Khom S, Vlkolinsky R, Bajo M, Roberto M (2022) Alcohol dependence induces CRF sensitivity in female central amygdala GABA synapses. Int J Mol Sci 23:7842.
  168. ↵
    Rosa PB, Ribeiro CM, Bettio LE, Colla A, Lieberknecht V, Moretti M, Rodrigues AL (2014) Folic acid prevents depressive-like behavior induced by chronic corticosterone treatment in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 127:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2014.10.003 pmid:25316305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  169. ↵
    Sadeghi M, Peeri M, Hosseini MJ (2016) Adolescent voluntary exercise attenuated hippocampal innate immunity responses and depressive-like behaviors following maternal separation stress in male rats. Physiol Behav 163:177–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.017 pmid:27184238
    OpenUrlPubMed
  170. ↵
    Salk RH, Hyde JS, Abramson LY (2017) Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychol Bull 143:783–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000102 pmid:28447828
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  171. ↵
    SAMHSA (2022). 2021 national survey on drug use and health (NSDUH) [Online]. SAMHSA. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2021-nsduh-annual-national-report.
  172. ↵
    Sartor CE, Lynskey MT, Heath AC, Jacob T, True W (2007) The role of childhood risk factors in initiation of alcohol use and progression to alcohol dependence. Addiction 102:216–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01661.x pmid:17222275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  173. ↵
    Sasibhushana RB, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, Srikumar BN (2019) Repeated finasteride administration induces depression-like behavior in adult male rats. Behav Brain Res 365:185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.006 pmid:30836157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  174. ↵
    Scarlata MJ, Lee SH, Lee D, Kandigian SE, Hiller AJ, Dishart JG, Mintz GE, Wang Z, Coste GI, Mousley AL, Soler I, Lawson K, Ng AJ, Bezek JL, Bergstrom HC (2019) Chemogenetic stimulation of the infralimbic cortex reverses alcohol-induced fear memory overgeneralization. Sci Rep 9:6730. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43159-w pmid:31040357
    OpenUrlPubMed
  175. ↵
    Schellekens AF, de Jong CA, Buitelaar JK, Verkes RJ (2015) Co-morbid anxiety disorders predict early relapse after inpatient alcohol treatment. Eur Psychiatry 30:128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2013.08.006 pmid:24630346
    OpenUrlPubMed
  176. ↵
    Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, Tinevez JY, White DJ, Hartenstein V, Eliceiri K, Tomancak P, Cardona A (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019 pmid:22743772
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  177. ↵
    Schunck RV, Torres IL, Laste G, de Souza A, Macedo IC, Valle MT, Salomón JL, Moreira S, Kuo J, Arbo MD, Dallegrave E, Leal MB (2015) Protracted alcohol abstinence induces analgesia in rats: possible relationships with BDNF and interleukin-10. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 135:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2015.05.011 pmid:26013579
    OpenUrlPubMed
  178. ↵
    Scott H, Tjernström N, Roman E (2020) Effects of pair housing on voluntary alcohol intake in male and female Wistar rats. Alcohol 86:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcohol.2019.12.005 pmid:31978460
    OpenUrlPubMed
  179. ↵
    Sharma AN, Pise A, Sharma JN, Shukla P (2015) Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist prevents development of tolerance to anti-anxiety effect of ethanol and withdrawal-induced anxiety in rats. Metab Brain Dis 30:719–730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11011-014-9627-z pmid:25380665
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  180. ↵
    Slade T, Chapman C, Swift W, Keyes K, Tonks Z, Teesson M (2016) Birth cohort trends in the global epidemiology of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in men and women: systematic review and metaregression. BMJ Open 6:e011827. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011827 pmid:27797998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  181. ↵
    Sloan TB, Roache JD, Johnson BA (2003) The role of anxiety in predicting drinking behaviour. Alcohol Alcohol 38:360–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agg090 pmid:12814905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  182. ↵
    Smith ML, Hostetler CM, Heinricher MM, Ryabinin AE (2016) Social transfer of pain in mice. Sci Adv 2:e1600855. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600855 pmid:27774512
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  183. ↵
    Smith ML, Walcott AT, Heinricher MM, Ryabinin AE (2017) Anterior cingulate cortex contributes to alcohol withdrawal-induced and socially transferred hyperalgesia. eNeuro 4:ENEURO.0087-17.2017. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0087-17.2017
    OpenUrl
  184. ↵
    Smith ML, Asada N, Malenka RC (2021) Anterior cingulate inputs to nucleus accumbens control the social transfer of pain and analgesia. Science 371:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe3040 pmid:33414216
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  185. ↵
    Smith RJ, Anderson RI, Haun HL, Mulholland PJ, Griffin WC 3rd., Lopez MF, Becker HC (2020) Dynamic c-Fos changes in mouse brain during acute and protracted withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol exposure and relapse drinking. Addict Biol 25:e12804.
    OpenUrl
  186. ↵
    Spanagel R, Montkowski A, Allingham K, Stöhr T, Shoaib M, Holsboer F, Landgraf R (1995) Anxiety: a potential predictor of vulnerability to the initiation of ethanol self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 122:369–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246268 pmid:8657835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  187. ↵
    Sparta DR, Sparrow AM, Lowery EG, Fee JR, Knapp DJ, Thiele TE (2008) Blockade of the corticotropin releasing factor type 1 receptor attenuates elevated ethanol drinking associated with drinking in the dark procedures. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 32:259–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00575.x pmid:18162072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  188. ↵
    Stelly CE, Tritley SC, Rafati Y, Wanat MJ (2020) Acute stress enhances associative learning via dopamine signaling in the ventral lateral striatum. J Neurosci 40:4391–4400. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3003-19.2020 pmid:32321745
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  189. ↵
    Sterley TL, Baimoukhametova D, Füzesi T, Zurek AA, Daviu N, Rasiah NP, Rosenegger D, Bains JS (2018) Social transmission and buffering of synaptic changes after stress. Nat Neurosci 21:393–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-017-0044-6 pmid:29311741
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  190. ↵
    Szumlinski KK, Coelho MA, Lee KM, Tran T, Sern KR, Bernal A, Kippin TE (2019) DID it or DIDn’t it? Exploration of a failure to replicate binge-like alcohol-drinking in C57BL/6J mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 178:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2018.12.002 pmid:30529114
    OpenUrlPubMed
  191. ↵
    Tapocik JD, Barbier E, Flanigan M, Solomon M, Pincus A, Pilling A, Sun H, Schank JR, King C, Heilig M (2014) microRNA-206 in rat medial prefrontal cortex regulates BDNF expression and alcohol drinking. J Neurosci 34:4581–4588. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0445-14.2014 pmid:24672003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  192. ↵
    Thakore N, Reno JM, Gonzales RA, Schallert T, Bell RL, Maddox WT, Duvauchelle CL (2016) Alcohol enhances unprovoked 22-28 kHz USVs and suppresses USV mean frequency in High Alcohol Drinking (HAD-1) male rats. Behav Brain Res 302:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.042 pmid:26802730
    OpenUrlPubMed
  193. ↵
    Tran L, Schulkin J, Greenwood-Van Meerveld B (2014) Importance of CRF receptor-mediated mechanisms of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in the processing of anxiety and pain. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:2633–2645. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2014.117 pmid:24853772
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  194. ↵
    Treutlein J, Kissling C, Frank J, Wiemann S, Dong L, Depner M, Saam C, Lascorz J, Soyka M, Preuss UW, Rujescu D, Skowronek MH, Rietschel M, Spanagel R, Heinz A, Laucht M, Mann K, Schumann G (2006) Genetic association of the human corticotropin releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRHR1) with binge drinking and alcohol intake patterns in two independent samples. Mol Psychiatry 11:594–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001813 pmid:16550213
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  195. ↵
    Tu Y, Jung M, Gollub RL, Napadow V, Gerber J, Ortiz A, Lang C, Mawla I, Shen W, Chan ST, Wasan AD, Edwards RR, Kaptchuk TJ, Rosen B, Kong J (2019) Abnormal medial prefrontal cortex functional connectivity and its association with clinical symptoms in chronic low back pain. Pain 160:1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001507 pmid:31107712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  196. ↵
    Ujcikova H, Robles D, Yue X, Svoboda P, Lee YS, Navratilova E (2022) Time-dependent changes in protein composition of medial prefrontal cortex in rats with neuropathic pain. Int J Mol Sci 23:955.
  197. ↵
    Valdez GR, Roberts AJ, Chan K, Davis H, Brennan M, Zorrilla EP, Koob GF (2002) Increased ethanol self-administration and anxiety-like behavior during acute ethanol withdrawal and protracted abstinence: regulation by corticotropin-releasing factor. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 26:1494–1501. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000033120.51856.F0 pmid:12394282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  198. ↵
    van Harmelen AL, van Tol MJ, van der Wee NJ, Veltman DJ, Aleman A, Spinhoven P, van Buchem MA, Zitman FG, Penninx BW, Elzinga BM (2010) Reduced medial prefrontal cortex volume in adults reporting childhood emotional maltreatment. Biol Psychiatry 68:832–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.011 pmid:20692648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  199. ↵
    van Rijn RM, Brissett DI, Whistler JL (2010) Dual efficacy of delta opioid receptor-selective ligands for ethanol drinking and anxiety. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 335:133–139. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.110.170969 pmid:20605909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  200. ↵
    Van Skike CE, Diaz-Granados JL, Matthews DB (2015) Chronic intermittent ethanol exposure produces persistent anxiety in adolescent and adult rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 39:262–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12617 pmid:25684048
    OpenUrlPubMed
  201. ↵
    Vendruscolo LF, Pamplona FA, Takahashi RN (2004) Strain and sex differences in the expression of nociceptive behavior and stress-induced analgesia in rats. Brain Res 1030:277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2004.10.016 pmid:15571676
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  202. ↵
    Vendruscolo LF, Vendruscolo JC, Terenina-Rigaldie E, Raba F, Ramos A, Takahashi RN, Mormède P (2006) Genetic influences on behavioral and neuroendocrine responses to predator-odor stress in rats. Neurosci Lett 409:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.07.026 pmid:17052845
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  203. ↵
    Vengeliene V, Vollmayr B, Henn FA, Spanagel R (2005) Voluntary alcohol intake in two rat lines selectively bred for learned helpless and non-helpless behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 178:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-004-2013-5 pmid:15719228
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  204. ↵
    Walcott AT, Smith ML, Loftis JM, Ryabinin AE (2018) Social transfer of alcohol withdrawal-induced hyperalgesia in female prairie voles. Soc Neurosci 13:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2018.1456957 pmid:29564972
    OpenUrlPubMed
  205. ↵
    Wang C, Bao C, Gao J, Gu Y, Dong XW (2020) Pain modulates neural responses to reward in the medial prefrontal cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 41:1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24882 pmid:31785068
    OpenUrlPubMed
  206. ↵
    Wang H, Spiess J, Wong PT, Zhu YZ (2011) Blockade of CRF1 and CCK2 receptors attenuated the elevated anxiety-like behavior induced by immobilization stress. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 98:362–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2011.01.022 pmid:21295058
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  207. ↵
    Wang N, Liu X, Li XT, Li XX, Ma W, Xu YM, Liu Y, Gao Q, Yang T, Wang H, Peng Y, Zhu XF, Guan YZ (2021) 7,8-dihydroxyflavone alleviates anxiety-like behavior induced by chronic alcohol exposure in mice involving tropomyosin-related kinase B in the amygdala. Mol Neurobiol 58:92–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-02111-0 pmid:32895785
    OpenUrlPubMed
  208. ↵
    Wang R, Liu ZH, Bi N, Gu X, Huang C, Zhou R, Liu H, Wang HL (2023) Dysfunction of the medial prefrontal cortex contributes to BPA-induced depression- and anxiety-like behavior in mice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 259:115034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115034 pmid:37210999
    OpenUrlPubMed
  209. ↵
    Wasserman D, Wasserman J, Rozanov V, Sokolowski M (2009) Depression in suicidal males: genetic risk variants in the CRHR1 gene. Genes Brain Behav 8:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00446.x pmid:19220485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  210. ↵
    Weber H, et al. (2016) Allelic variation in CRHR1 predisposes to panic disorder: evidence for biased fear processing. Mol Psychiatry 21:813–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2015.125 pmid:26324098
    OpenUrlPubMed
  211. ↵
    Weera MM, Agoglia AE, Douglass E, Jiang Z, Rajamanickam S, Shackett RS, Herman MA, Justice NJ, Gilpin NW (2022) Generation of a CRF1-Cre transgenic rat and the role of central amygdala CRF1 cells in nociception and anxiety-like behavior. Elife 11:e67822. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67822
    OpenUrl
  212. ↵
    White A, Castle IJ, Chen CM, Shirley M, Roach D, Hingson R (2015) Converging patterns of alcohol use and related outcomes among females and males in the United States, 2002 to 2012. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 39:1712–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.12815 pmid:26331879
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  213. ↵
    White AM (2020) Gender differences in the epidemiology of alcohol use and related harms in the United States. Alcohol Res 40:01. https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v40.2.01 pmid:33133878
    OpenUrlPubMed
  214. ↵
    Wohleb ES, Terwilliger R, Duman CH, Duman RS (2018) Stress-induced neuronal colony stimulating factor 1 provokes microglia-mediated neuronal remodeling and depressive-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry 83:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.05.026 pmid:28697890
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  215. ↵
    Xu H, Li H, Liu D, Wen W, Xu M, Frank JA, Chen J, Zhu H, Grahame NJ, Luo J (2021) Chronic voluntary alcohol drinking causes anxiety-like behavior, thiamine deficiency, and brain damage of female crossed high alcohol preferring mice. Front Pharmacol 12:614396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.614396 pmid:33767622
    OpenUrlPubMed
  216. ↵
    Ye S, Yang R, Xiong Q, Yang Y, Zhou L, Gong Y, Li C, Ding Z, Ye G, Xiong Z (2018) Acute stress enhances learning and memory by activating acid-sensing ion channels in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 498:1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.122 pmid:29555470
    OpenUrlPubMed
  217. ↵
    You DS, Hahn HA, Welsh TH, Meagher MW (2020) Hyperalgesia after a drinking episode in young adult binge drinkers: a cross-sectional study. Alcohol Alcohol 55:608–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaa035 pmid:32476005
    OpenUrlPubMed
  218. ↵
    Yu H, Chen L, Lei H, Pi G, Xiong R, Jiang T, Wu D, Sun F, Gao Y, Li Y, Peng W, Huang B, Song G, Wang X, Lv J, Jin Z, Ke D, Yang Y, Wang JZ (2022) Infralimbic medial prefrontal cortex signalling to calbindin 1 positive neurons in posterior basolateral amygdala suppresses anxiety- and depression-like behaviours. Nat Commun 13:5462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33139-6 pmid:36115848
    OpenUrlPubMed
  219. ↵
    Zhang H, Wang F, Xu H, Liu Y, Liu J, Zhao H, Gelernter J (2014) Differentially co-expressed genes in postmortem prefrontal cortex of individuals with alcohol use disorders: influence on alcohol metabolism-related pathways. Hum Genet 133:1383–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-014-1473-x pmid:25073604
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  220. ↵
    Zhang P, Zeng D, Yi YL, Tang YY, Zou W, Yang XF, Wang CY, Tang XQ (2018) β2-microglobulin induces depressive- and anxiety-like behaviors in rat. PLoS One 13:e0198027. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198027 pmid:29795686
    OpenUrlPubMed
  221. ↵
    Zhang Z, Morse AC, Koob GF, Schulteis G (2007) Dose- and time-dependent expression of anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze during withdrawal from acute and repeated intermittent ethanol intoxication in rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 31:1811–1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00483.x pmid:17877783
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  222. ↵
    Zhao Y, Skandali N, Bethlehem RAI, Voon V (2022) Mesial prefrontal cortex and alcohol misuse: dissociating cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships in UK Biobank. Biol Psychiatry 92:907–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.03.008 pmid:35589437
    OpenUrlPubMed
  223. ↵
    Zhou Y, Huang S, Wu F, Zheng Q, Zhang F, Luo Y, Jian X (2021) Atractylenolide III reduces depressive- and anxiogenic-like behaviors in rat depression models. Neurosci Lett 759:136050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136050 pmid:34126179
    OpenUrlPubMed
  224. ↵
    Zorrilla EP, Heilig M, de Wit H, Shaham Y (2013) Behavioral, biological, and chemical perspectives on targeting CRF(1) receptor antagonists to treat alcoholism. Drug Alcohol Depend 128:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.017 pmid:23294766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Synthesis

Reviewing Editor: Leandro Vendruscolo, National Institute on Drug Abuse

Decisions are customarily a result of the Reviewing Editor and the peer reviewers coming together and discussing their recommendations until a consensus is reached. When revisions are invited, a fact-based synthesis statement explaining their decision and outlining what is needed to prepare a revision will be listed below. The following reviewer(s) agreed to reveal their identity: Candice Contet.

N/A

Author Response

Response to Reviewers

We thank the reviewers for the time and attention to this manuscript. We believe the points raised were important and have done our best to address all of the changes suggested by the reviewers. We feel the work has been much improved by their suggestions. Below, please find each concern raised by the reviewer and our response. Changes in the manuscript and supplemental material are indicated in blue text throughout.

Reviewer 1

1. Given the emphasis of the study on nociception and affect, the focus on prelimbic and infralimbic cortex for histological analysis is weakly justified. The study would be strengthened by including additional CRF1-rich regions where CRF1 signaling has been implicated in modulating alcohol drinking, affective behaviors, and/or pain thresholds. Furthermore, it might be fruitful to also analyze the correlation between CRF1+ and cFos+ counts and nociceptive/affective readouts. For instance, based on ref 50/52, lower von Frey nociceptive thresholds of females at baseline may correlate with higher activity of central amygdala CRF1+ neurons.

We performed additional correlational analyses between the IHC components and the behaviors mentioned and found no significant correlations between CRF1+ cells, double labeled cells, or %CRF1+ labeled cells in either sub-region and affective/nociceptive readouts. However, thermal sensitivity correlated with cFos+ cells in the prelimbic cortex in drinking females, and mechanical sensitivity correlated directly with cFos+ cell counts in the infralimbic cortex of drinking males. We hesitate to add these findings to the manuscript due to the timing of behavioral testing and tissue collection: NSF was performed 3d before tissue collection, splash test was performed 8d before tissue collection, Hargreaves was performed 13d before tissue collection, and Von Frey was performed 18d before tissue collection. Because cFos is considered an immediate early gene with peak expression 30-90min following an event and levels drop to control levels within 12h (PMID: 25814929), this timing creates a significant complication for comparing cFos expression to behavioral testing that occurred 3-18d before tissue collection. We have added text to the discussion acknowledging this as a limitation.

Additionally, we recognize that the manuscript may be strengthened by adding immunohistochemical analysis of more CRF rich-regions that have also been implicated in alcohol, affect, and pain. However, the focus of this work was on the less explored CRF-rich regions prelimbic and infralimbic subregions of the PFC. Additional areas will be the focus of future studies. We have added additional justification for studying the PFC in the introduction and have also included a paragraph in the discussion regarding the more traditional regions.

2. The unique finding of this study, which was afforded by the use of CRF1 reporter rats, relates to the sex-specific correlation between alcohol intake and activation of infralimbic CFR1-expressing cells. Testing the behavioral significance of this observation (by manipulating CRF1 signaling or CRF1+ cell activity in the infralimbic cortex) would greatly enhance the impact of the study. At the very least, published studies that have performed such manipulations in the context of alcohol self-administration should be referenced and discussed (cf. PMID 35341789).

We agree with the reviewer that manipulation of CRF1+ neurons in the infralimbic cortex would be of significant interest and plan to explore these manipulations in greater detail in future/ongoing studies. We have added discussion of the paper referenced (as well as another) into the discussion. We have also added text to the discussion regarding future studies that will test the behavioral significance of the observation.

3. The manuscript would benefit from clearly laying out in the introduction (and abstract) the hypotheses that this study was designed to test and the gaps of knowledge it sought to fill given that sex differences in nociception, affect, and alcohol drinking had already been examined by previous rat studies. It would also be helpful to explain from the outset the rationale for conducting this study in CRF1 reporter rats and why a duration of 3-4 weeks of intermittent alcohol drinking was selected prior to repeating nociceptive/affective testing (while a longer duration was known to be needed to produce intake escalation).

Specific hypotheses have now been added to both the abstract and introduction. In the introduction, we have added rationale for the shorter duration drinking experiments as well as why the study was done in CRF1 reporter rats. By performing these studies in CRF1-cre transgenic rats, we confirm the sex differences and behaviors seen in previous studies but in this transgenic line for the first time. Additionally, we identify the PFC as a target for sex-specific differences in CRF1 activity and lay the groundwork for manipulating the CRF1-containing neurons in future studies.

4. The interpretation of the affective measures seems arbitrary. Why would grooming latency reflect anxiety-like behavior but grooming duration would reflect depressive-like behavior? Are these statements related to known effects of anxiolytic or antidepressant drugs on these measures? The NSF latency has been interpreted as an index of anxiety-like behavior in some studies (conflict-based test) and depressive-like behavior in other studies (based on the effect of chronic antidepressant treatment). In the end, those labels are not particularly helpful for data interpretation, unless multiple assays tapping into the same domain yield convergent findings. In the present study, it seems preferable to use objective descriptions of the behavioral responses measured (grooming propensity and refeeding hesitancy).

We have removed the mention of anxiety- and depressive-like behavior from the results section and replaced it with objective descriptions. Additionally, there are mixed interpretations of if these tests measure anxiety- or depressive-like behavior (if not both). Thus, we decided to remove these terms and instead use affective behavior as a collective term throughout the manuscript.

5. As acknowledged in the Discussion, it is possible that repeating the same nociceptive and affective tests after a 3-4 week break masked the effects of alcohol drinking. The effect of repetition/time is interpreted as increased mechanical sensitivity and negative affect, but other parameters confounding data interpretation should be mentioned/discussed. For instance, the hesitancy to eat in the NSF test stems from the novelty of the context in which food is presented. If the same arena was used in both iterations of the NSF test, the context is no longer novel at re-test, which could explain shorter latencies despite a possibly similar affective state. Likewise, the significant correlation between NSF latencies and ethanol intake may be related to an impaired memory of the testing context rather than altered anxiety levels. The same effect of context novelty may also apply to the splash test. For nociceptive tests, stress-induced analgesia may have influenced thresholds to a larger extent at baseline than at re-test. For NSF, differential body weight loss during food deprivation could also explain differential appetite/food consumption.

Thank you for raising these important points.. We have added text to the discussion considering the limitations and alternative possibilities of repeat testing. Additionally, the reviewer brings up a great point about the potential for weight loss during food deprivation to influence appetite. One confounding problem is that body weights were not measured immediately before food deprivation (and instead were taken 1 week prior to the test). However, body weights were taken on the day of the NSF test (ie following 24h of food deprivation). Using these measurements, we examined body weight loss in all 4 groups (shown below) and found no effect of neither sex nor EtOH intake (Sex: F(1,28)=0.002, p=0.96; EtOH: F(1,28)=2.0, p=0.17; Sex x EtOH: F(1,28)=0.011, p=0.92). Additionally, body weight loss did not correlate with latency to eat or home-cage food consumption during NSF. These graphs have now been added to Supplementary Figure 5-2.

6. With the exception of baseline mechanical nociception, the only significant effects reported are correlations among alcohol-drinking rats. However, there is no discussion of whether these correlations hold if the water drinkers are included. This could help interpret the correlations as either a consequence of alcohol exposure (in which case the correlation should be preserved when including water drinkers as their data should be most similar to low-alcohol drinkers) or as a predictor of alcohol drinking propensity (in which case correlations may collapse when including water drinkers since they weren't given a chance to consume alcohol).

We considered the possibility of adding the water drinkers to the correlations, with their EtOH intake being zero. However, correlations represent data that varies in two variables. Thus, by adding the water animals with the intake being 0, we only add samples to one factor (behavioral output) while keeping the other (EtOH intake) constant, artificially deflating the correlations we aim to investigate. We have included the graphs below, with water drinkers shown in navy and you can see that the correlations effectively disappear. However, we did add text to the discussion regarding the relationship between EtOH intake and behavior as more of a predictor of drinking propensity.

7. The von Frey paw withdrawal thresholds reported here are almost 10-fold lower than those reported in ref 50/52 for the same line of rats. Please discuss what could explain this difference.

There could be many reasons for discrepancies in withdrawal thresholds. We agree that it is important to consider our findings in the context of previous work and have added text in the discussion addressing potential reasons for this difference (social isolation).

8. Some methodological details need to be added:

a. In section 2.2, specify the number of sprays and/or sprayed volume, and the area of the rat body that was targeted by the spray(s).

The number of sprays (1), volume (100 μL), and area of the rat body targeted (dorsal coat of the torso) has been added to the methods.

b. In section 2.6, specify the circadian timepoint at which alcohol bottles were introduced/removed. This has been added to the text (ZT 3).

c. Specify how many hours after alcohol access each post-consumption nociceptive and affective test was conducted, and how long after alcohol access was resumed. This has been added to 2.7.

d. Explain why the order of tests was different at baseline vs. post-consumption. This has been added into the text, in section 2.8.

9. Other fixes:

a. In the Introduction, second paragraph, second sentence, replace “are mediated by” by “involve” (CRF is unlikely to be the only mechanism). Thank you for this suggestion, this change has been made.

b. In the Discussion, third paragraph, equating increased mechanical sensitivity to negative affect is a shortcut. Use another term to encapsulate all phenotypes. Throughout the text, we have reworded sentences to better encapsulate these phenotypes, using “affective and nociceptive behaviors” instead.

Likewise, in Results section 3.3, last sentence, replace “any of the affective behaviors” with “any of the nociceptive or affective behaviors”. This has been changed.

c. In Figure 5A, use a linear rather than logarithmic Y-axis to facilitate comparisons between graphs. Using a linear axis on this graph would be inappropriate, as the data do not follow a normal distribution and thus cannot be compared as is with a 3-way ANOVA. However, when data is transformed logarithmically, the data follows a normal distribution and parametric testing can be performed. However, to facilitate comparisons between baseline and post-drinking tests, we have added a log scale graph of baseline NSF latency to Supplemental Figure 1-2.

d. Consolidate refs 50 and 52. The adjustments have been made.

Reviewer 2:

The present study evaluated various behaviors in a transgenic strain of CRF-cre rats using tests of affective behaviors and an intermittent access 2-bottle choice drinking procedure. While it is important to evaluate and characterize behavior in new transgenic strains of animals, there are major problems with this manuscript. There is too much emphasis on the interaction between AUD and affective behavior in this manuscript given that a model of AUD was not used. In the discussion, the authors acknowledged and discussed the short duration that the rats were allowed to drink and the impact that may have had on their results. This is appreciated but the introduction should also reflect that this is not a study of AUD. Additionally, the conclusions of this manuscript on the impact of alcohol drinking on affective behavior and prelimbic and infralimbic activity are an over reach. Additional comments are listed below.

We appreciate this critical feedback. We have removed the term “AUD” from the abstract, and have edited the introduction to instead place emphasis on the interactions between alcohol use and affective behavior (rather than AUD and behavior). We have also added references to publications that found effects of short duration EtOH drinking on affective and nociceptive behaviors to better contextualize the work contained in the present study.

Comments:

The abstract is a bit vague, the method of alcohol drinking should be stated as intermittent 2BC.

This has been adjusted.

In the sentence “EtOH drinking decreased mechanical sensitivity, but no other group effects were observed” - group effects of what? Affective behavior? Please state this.

This has been adjusted and additional text clarifying group effects has been added.

When the statement “group effects,” is used it is not clear if they are talking about alcohol-drinking vs non alcohol drinking rats or male vs. female rats. Please clarify.

This has been adjusted for clarity throughout the abstract and revised manuscript

Regarding the splash test, can the authors include citations of papers that explain why these two grooming-related measures are reflective of anxiety or depressive-like behavior. Same for the NSF test. The original paper by Simms et al. (2008) characterizing intermittent 2BC should be cited as well.

We agree that there are many definitions of anxiety- and depressive-like behavior and that lack of cariy in these terms can confound interpretation and communication of our findings. Thus, we have removed all use of these terms and instead replaced them with the more objective term “affective behavior” throughout the manuscript. At the reviewer's suggestion, we also added citations that use these tests in these ways. The Simms citation has now been added.

Figure 1A. The experimental timeline figure can be improved upon. It would be easier to understand if the authors included the duration of time for all of the components of the experiment, i.e., how long the rats were single-housed and the number of days the baseline and post-drinking behavioral tests conducted. The figure also makes it seem like alcohol drinking only occurred for 3 weeks.

Thank you for this suggestion, we have modified the timeline (shown below for convenience) with hopes of better communicating the duration of alcohol drinking as well as the duration times for all components.

Figures 2B, 3A-C. The baseline and post-test paw withdrawal threshold values are dramatically lower than what is reported in the literature for rats of a comparable age (Ririe & Eisenach 2006, Edwards et al. 2012) This makes it difficult to interpret the results as meaningful on their own or in relation to alcohol intake. The authors should address this major discrepancy.

The reviewer is correct that the paw withdrawal latencies measured here are much lower than previously reported. This could be due to many potential reasons including differences in housing environment, vendor/transport differences, or equipment/testing environment differences. We agree that it is important to consider our findings in the context of previous work and We have now added text in the discussion addressing potential reasons for this discrepancy (social isolation or social transfer of stress).

It is evident in Figures 4A and 4B that grooming behavior was not affected by sex or history of alcohol drinking, therefore it is unclear what Figures 4C and 4D add to this paper.

One limitation of the data presented in figures 4A-B is that some animals never initiated grooming during the 10 min period. As a result, they were assigned latencies of 600s and this assumes that the animals would have groomed immediately if we waited any longer. In reality, by assigning this artificial value, we are reducing the chances of seeing any effect by creating an artificial ceiling. The data presented in 4C and 4D bypass this limitation by instead looking at what proportion of animals have initiated grooming at a given timepoint, making the grooming a discrete rather than continuous variable.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (7)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 7
July 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Chronic Alcohol Drinking Drives Sex-Specific Differences in Affective Behavior and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity in CRF1:Cre:tdTomato Transgenic Rats
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Chronic Alcohol Drinking Drives Sex-Specific Differences in Affective Behavior and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity in CRF1:Cre:tdTomato Transgenic Rats
Sema G. Quadir, Gillian M. Arleth, Meredith G. Cone, Margaret W. High, Maria C. Ramage, Devin P. Effinger, Maria Echeveste Sanchez, Melissa A. Herman
eNeuro 6 July 2023, 10 (7) ENEURO.0055-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0055-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Chronic Alcohol Drinking Drives Sex-Specific Differences in Affective Behavior and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Activity in CRF1:Cre:tdTomato Transgenic Rats
Sema G. Quadir, Gillian M. Arleth, Meredith G. Cone, Margaret W. High, Maria C. Ramage, Devin P. Effinger, Maria Echeveste Sanchez, Melissa A. Herman
eNeuro 6 July 2023, 10 (7) ENEURO.0055-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0055-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • alcohol
  • anxiety
  • pain
  • corticotropin releasing factor receptor 1
  • prefrontal cortex
  • prelimbic
  • infralimbic

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Novel roles for the GPI-anchor cleaving enzyme, GDE2, in hippocampal synaptic morphology and function
  • Upright posture: a singular condition stabilizing sensorimotor coordination
  • EEG Signatures of Auditory Distraction: Neural Responses to Spectral Novelty in Real-World Soundscapes
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Release of Extracellular Matrix Components after Human Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Gene variants related to primary familial brain calcification: perspectives from bibliometrics and meta-analysis
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.