Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

Noradrenergic Input from Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Regulates Parabrachial Activity in Mice

Yadong Ji, Chimdiya Onwukwe, Jesse Smith, Hanna Laub, Luca Posa, Asaf Keller, Radi Masri and Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 18 April 2023, 10 (5) ENEURO.0412-22.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0412-22.2023
Yadong Ji
2Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chimdiya Onwukwe
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
3Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jesse Smith
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
3Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hanna Laub
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luca Posa
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asaf Keller
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
3Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
4Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Asaf Keller
Radi Masri
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
2Department of Advanced Oral Sciences and Therapeutics, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, MD 21201
3Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
4Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Cramer
1Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
3Program in Neuroscience, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
4Center to Advance Chronic Pain Research, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nathan Cramer
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Detecting norepinephrine transients in PB using NE2h sensor. A, Successful targeting of lateral PB in control experiments. Expression of eGFP in four mice injected with a control virus using the same coordinates used for NE2h injections and photometry probe placement. To identify PBl in these sections, we used the shapes of the flanking ventral spinocerebellar tract (sctv) and superior cerebellar peduncle (scp) to find the matching coronal section in the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas. We based the extent of PBl (dashed line) from the corresponding atlas section. No photometry data were obtained from mouse eGFP-22, but it is included here to support the accuracy of our PBl coordinates. B, Bath application of NE in vitro caused a dose dependent increase in NE2h fluorescence in acute PB slices. The decline in fluorescence following washout (blue bar) was partially reversed by the selective NE uptake inhibitor reboxetine (1 nm). C, In anesthetized mice, noxious mechanical and thermal stimuli reliably produce long lasting NE transients in PB. In each panel, the baseline normalized changes in fluorescence (ΔF/F) for individual trials are shown as heat maps with the mean and 95% confidence intervals of all responses below. The time scale for each mean response applies to the corresponding heat map.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Laterality of noxious heat stimulus has little effect on NE transients. Noxious thermal stimuli applied to the face (A) or hindpaw (B) produce NE transients that are similar in magnitude and duration whether applied contralaterally or ipsilaterally to the fiber optic probe in PB. In each graph, the light gray traces represent the mean response of an individual mouse to approximately five stimuli. The black trace and shaded region indicate the group mean with 95% confidence intervals. The approximate duration of stimulation across all mice is indicated by the colored bar below each set of traces. The magnitude of transients evoked by contralateral or ipsilateral were not different from each other when measured as the area under the curve (C) or peak ΔF/F (D). Paired t test, p > 0.05.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Contralateral mechanical stimuli produce larger magnitude NE transients in PB. A, Responses of individual mice (light traces) and mean with 95% confidence intervals (dark trace with shaded region) to noxious pinch applied to the hindpaws (green bar). (B) Contralateral stimuli produced transients that were greater in magnitude measured as the area under the curve and peak ΔF/F. C, Responses of individual mice (light traces) and mean with 95% confidence intervals (dark trace with shaded region) to noxious pinch applied to the tail (green bar) and corresponding area under the curve and peak ΔF/F values in D. Paired t test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    NE transient onset latencies vary by stimulus modality. Expanded views of NE transients evoked by mechanical (A) or thermal (C) stimulation (group mean and 95% CIs). Latencies from the beginning of the stimulus to onset of the NE2h response were shorter for mechanical stimuli (B) and varied by stimulus location for thermal stimuli (D), likely reflecting the rate at which each stimulus became noxious. There were no differences in latencies between contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli of the same modality and location. Paired t test, p > 0.05.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Electrical stimulation of cNTS generates long lasting NE transients in PB. A, Example heat maps from one mouse showing the change in NE2h fluorescence evoked by electrically stimulating cNTS at different frequencies but fixed intensity. The letters “C” and “I” indicate trials where the stimulus was applied to the contralateral and ipsilateral cNTS relative to the fiber photometry probe. B, Mean responses for each stimulus frequency for the data shown in A. We observed a similar frequency-dependent response in three mice (C). There was no effect of stimulation side at any frequency, so data from contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli were combined for analysis (paired t test, p > 0.05).

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    cNTS neurons respond to noxious stimulation. Raster plots and peristimulus time histograms of single unit recordings from unidentified cNTS neurons responding to noxious mechanical (A) and thermal (B) stimuli. C, Group data from 8 neurons (3 mechanical and 5 thermal) reveal a significant response to noxious stimuli by cNTS neurons (Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, *p < 0.05), with onset latencies that may reflect the slow rate at which the stimulus became noxious (D).

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    cNTScat afferent stimulation potentiates excitatory synaptic transmission in PB. A, Representative voltage clamp recording from a PB neuron showing the sustained increase in synaptic activity after cNTScat afferent stimulation (10 Hz, 10 s, red bars). B, Synaptic activity increased to a mean of 370% of prestimulation values in eight neurons. There was no effect of cNTScat stimulation on event amplitude (C), despite a small reduction in membrane resistance (D). The cNTScat-evoked increase in sEPSC frequency was prolonged in five neurons and decayed back to prestimulus values with a time constant of 100 s (E).

  • Figure 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 8.

    cNTScat stimulation potentiates sensory inputs to PB neurons. A, Representative EPSCs in PB neurons evoked by paired optical stimulation of SpVc afferent terminals before (black) and after (red) cNTScat optical afferent stimulation. Inset shows example recording verifying the specificity of optical activation. B, Evoked EPSC amplitudes were significantly increased by cNTScat activation by an average of 154%. C, Paired pulse ratio (PPR) was reduced to 80% of the baseline value (95% CIs: 70–100%) at a significance of p = 0.051 (paired t test, n = 6).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Magnitude of NE2h responses to noxious thermal stimuli

    NE2h response to thermal stimulationAUCΔF/F (%)
    MeanCIsp-valueMeanCIsp-value
    FaceContra0.560.20–0.910.061.60.9–2.30.04
    Ipsi0.510.18–0.841.50.8–2.2
    HindpawContra0.490.28–0.710.251.61.1–2.10.6
    Ipsi0.560.24–0.881.70.8–2.6
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Magnitude of NE2h responses to noxious mechanical stimuli

    NE2h response to mechanical stimulationAUCΔF/F (%)
    MeanCIsp-valueMeanCIsp-value
    HindpawContra0.610.18–1.00.041.80.7–2.80.005
    Ipsi0.510.14–0.881.50.5–2.4
    Tail0.770.23–1.3N/A1.80.7–2.9N/A
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Latency to NE2h response onset for mechanical and thermal stimuli

    NE2h onset
    latencies
    MechanicalThermal
    HindpawTailFaceHindpaw
    ContraIpsiContraIpsiContraIpsi
    Mean0.700.720.564.004.107.107.70
    Lower 95% CI0.630.650.373.104.006.206.90
    Upper 95% CI0.760.790.744.804.308.108.60
    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Rate of decay in NE2h fluorescence from the peak response

    NE transient decay ratesMechanical Decay Rate (τ)Thermal Decay Rate (τ)
    HindpawTailFaceHindpaw
    ContraIpsiContraIpsiContraIpsi
    Mean17.1517.4315.5814.8515.6215.4219.86
    Lower 95% CI12.4113.188.84210.4611.6611.5113.09
    Upper 95% CI26.1624.794023.5822.5622.6338.6
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (5)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 5
May 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Noradrenergic Input from Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Regulates Parabrachial Activity in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Noradrenergic Input from Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Regulates Parabrachial Activity in Mice
Yadong Ji, Chimdiya Onwukwe, Jesse Smith, Hanna Laub, Luca Posa, Asaf Keller, Radi Masri, Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 18 April 2023, 10 (5) ENEURO.0412-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0412-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Noradrenergic Input from Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Regulates Parabrachial Activity in Mice
Yadong Ji, Chimdiya Onwukwe, Jesse Smith, Hanna Laub, Luca Posa, Asaf Keller, Radi Masri, Nathan Cramer
eNeuro 18 April 2023, 10 (5) ENEURO.0412-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0412-22.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • exteroceptive
  • interoceptive
  • norepinephrine
  • nucleus of the solitary tract
  • pain
  • parabrachial

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Heading and then saccades predict visual discrimination decisions in freely moving ferrets
  • Disrupting motor cortical regional activity during motor sequence skill training impairs human motor visuomotor skill acquisition and learning that is not sequence-specific
  • Whole-Brain Mapping of Neuronal Activity Associated with Vocal Socialization Behaviors in Adult Mice
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Heading and then saccades predict visual discrimination decisions in freely moving ferrets
  • Postnatal Development of Pyramidal Neurons Excitability and Synaptic Inputs in Mouse Gustatory Cortical Circuits
  • Refinement of Locomotor Activity during Development Is Correlated to Increased Dopaminergic Signaling in Larval Zebrafish
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.