Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Novel Tools and Methods

LIQ HD (Lick Instance Quantifier Home Cage Device): An Open-Source Tool for Recording Undisturbed Two-Bottle Drinking Behavior in a Home Cage Environment

Nicholas Petersen, Danielle N. Adank, Ritika Raghavan, Danny G. Winder and Marie A. Doyle
eNeuro 30 March 2023, 10 (4) ENEURO.0506-22.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0506-22.2023
Nicholas Petersen
1Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
2Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle N. Adank
1Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
2Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ritika Raghavan
1Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
2Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danny G. Winder
1Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
2Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
4Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie A. Doyle
1Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
2Vanderbilt Center for Addiction Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
3Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marie A. Doyle
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    LIQ HD design and validation. A, 3D rendering of LIQ HD disassembled components, including 3D-printed parts, rubber stoppers with sippers, and conductive copper foil tape. B, LIQ HD electronic parts and wiring diagram. C, Correlation between total lick number and change in bottle weight for each recording period. D, Correlation between total lick duration and change in bottle weight for each recording period. E, Correlation between total lick number and lick duration for each recording period. In correlation graphs, solid lines represent a fitted simple linear regression model, and dashed lines denote 95% confidence intervals. F, Lick number and estimated water consumption throughout an undisturbed 7-d recording period with access to two water bottles. Data from both water bottles are combined to show the total intake per cage. The shaded purple area signifies the dark/active phase. The solid line represents the mean lick number and estimated intake in 1-h bins, and the shaded area represents ±SEM (n = 16 cages). The raster plot displays licks detected in 1-min bins for each cage. For the infrared photobeam-based two-bottle choice device design, wiring diagram, and validation, please see Extended Data Figure 1-1.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Using LIQ HD to investigate changes in drink preference and light/dark cycle drinking patterns in sucrose and quinine two-bottle choice paradigms. A, Correlation between percent preference calculated with lick number and percent preference calculated with change in bottle weight for each recording period. B, Correlation between percent preference calculated with lick duration and percent preference calculated with change in bottle weight for each recording period. Solid lines represent fitted simple linear regression models, and dashed lines denote 95% confidence intervals. C, Preference over time in 1-h bins for the sucrose and quinine two-bottle choice dose–response paradigm. The solid line represents smoothed mean (sliding window length of 6), and the shaded area signifies ±SEM (n = 8 cages for each group). Vertical dashed lines indicate when bottles swapped sides and when indicated, a change in experimental solution in one bottle. D–I, Lick number over time in 1-h bins for recording periods for the two-bottle choice sucrose and quinine dose response paradigms. The shaded purple area signifies the dark/active phase. J, Percentage of total licks that occur during the dark and light phases for recording periods of the sucrose dose–response paradigm (repeated measures two-way ANOVA, with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). During access to 10% sucrose, the percentage of licks that occurred during the dark phase was significantly decreased, and the percentage of licks that occurred during the light phase was significantly increased when compared with 0.5% and 1% sucrose availability. K, Percentage of total licks during the dark and light phases for the quinine dose–response paradigm (repeated measures two-way ANOVA, with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). Shaded areas and error bars represent ±SEM; ****p < 0.0001.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Histograms of average baseline bout microstructure measurements from 1-h bins during one-week access to two water bottles (N = 16 mice, n = 32 bottles). Histogram displaying bout duration (A), bout size (B), lick frequency (C), and estimated interlick interval (D). Red and blue dashed lines represent the median and mean, respectively.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Validation of LIQ HD bout detection and bout microstructure in an ethanol two-bottle choice paradigm. A, Correlation between total bout number and change in bottle weight for each recording period. B, Correlation between total bout duration and change in bottle weight for each recording period. C, Correlation between percent preference calculated with bout number and percent preference calculated with change in bottle weight for each recording period. D, Correlation between percent preference calculated with bout duration and percent preference calculated with change in bottle weight for each recording period. Solid lines represent a fitted simple linear regression model, and dashed lines denote 95% confidence intervals. E, Preference over time in 1-h bins for the ethanol two-bottle choice paradigm. The solid line represents smoothed mean (sliding window length of 6), and shaded area signifies ±SEM (n = 8 cages). Vertical dashed lines indicate when bottles swapped sides and when indicated, a change of experimental solution in one bottle. F, Average preference for experimental bottle during ethanol two-bottle choice paradigm (repeated measures one-way ANOVA, with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). Mice show significantly increased preference compared with baseline for 7% and 10% ethanol. Bout duration (G), bout size (I), lick frequency (K), and estimated interlick interval (M) over time in 24-h bins for water and ethanol bottles. Bout microstructure data were grouped into 24-h bins because there were no significant differences between the light and dark cycle (Extended Data Fig. 4-1). Average bout duration (H), bout size (J), lick frequency (L), and estimated interlick interval (N) during access to two water bottles and access to water with increasing concentrations of ethanol (repeated measures two-way ANOVA, with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test). At the ethanol bottle, mice display a significant decrease in bout duration (G), bout size (I), and interlick interval (N) with a significant increase in lick frequency (L) during access to increasing concentrations of ethanol. At the water bottle, mice display a significant increase in lick frequency only during access to 3% ethanol (L), a significant decrease in bout duration during access to 3% and 10% ethanol (H), and a significant decrease in bout size only during access to 10% ethanol (J). Shaded areas and error bars represent ±SEM; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Complete list of LIQ HD building components with manufacturer and distributor product information, quantity per system, price per component unit, and total cost in $USD

    ItemManufacturer (product #)Distributor (product #)Qty.Price/unit
    ($USD)
    Total
    ($USD)
    Arduino Mega 2560 Rev3Arduino (A000067)Digi-Key (1050-1018-ND)148.4048.40
    2.8” Capacitive Touch ShieldAdafruit (1947)Digi-Key (1528-1050-ND)144.9544.95
    Adafruit Data Logging ShieldAdafruit (1141)Digi-Key (1528-1044-ND)113.9513.95
    Shield Stacking Headers for ArduinoAdafruit (85)Digi-Key (1528-1074-ND)11.951.95
    12.5 mm 3V CR1220 Lithium BatteryJauch Quartz (CR
    1220 JAUCH SB)
    Digi-Key (1908-
    CR1220JAUCHSB-ND)
    11.091.09
    8GB microSD Card with AdapterAdafruit (1294)Adafruit (1294)19.959.95
    MPR121 12-Key Capacitive Touch Sensor BreakoutAdafruit (1982)Digi-Key (1528-1038-ND)37.9523.85
    12V 5A Switching Power SupplyAdafruit (352)Digi-Key (1528-1664-ND)124.9524.95
    Qwiic Multiport ConnectorSparkFun (BOB-18012)Digi-Key (1568-BOB-18012-ND)12.102.10
    Qwiic Cable Breadboard JumperSparkFun (PRT-14425)Digi-Key (1568-1709-ND)11.501.50
    Flexible Qwiic Cable – 500 mmSparkFun (PRT-17257)Digi-Key (1568-PRT-17257-ND)22.384.76
    Flexible Qwiic Cable – 50 mmSparkFun (PRT-17260)Digi-Key (1568-PRT-17260-ND)11.061.06
    2.5 mm Pitch 2-pin Cable Matching PairAdafruit (4872)Digi-Key (1528-4872-ND)180.9517.10
    Hook-up Wire Spool Set - 22AWG Stranded-Core – 10 × 25ftAdafruit (3175)Digi-Key (1528-1746-ND)129.9529.95
    Solid-Core Wire Spool - 25 ft - 22AWG - RedAdafruit (288)Digi-Key (1528-1750-ND)12.952.95
    Kable Kontrol Heat Shrink Tubing - 2:1 Polyolefin – 3/16” - 10’ Various ColorsCables Ties And More
    (HS357-S10)
    Cables Ties And More
    (HS357-S10)
    65.9735.82
    Kable Kontrol Heat Shrink Tubing - 2:1 Polyolefin – 1/8” - 10’ BlackCables Ties And More
    (HS355-S10-BLACK)
    Cables Ties And More
    (HS355-S10-BLACK)
    15.505.50
    Translucent Clear PRO Series PETG Filament - 2.85 mm (1 kg; or equivalent)MatterHackers (M-A9A-GJF6)MatterHackers (M-A9A-GJF6)155.0055.00
    Black PRO Series PETG Filament - 2.85 mm (1 kg; or equivalent)MatterHackers (M-M82-QGPE)MatterHackers (M-M82-QGPE)255.00110
    Purple MH Build Series PLA Filament - 2.85 mm (1 kg; or equivalent)MatterHackers(M-ZR7-0EQU)MatterHackers(M-ZR7-0EQU)120.8720.87
    Food Safe Clear Epoxy Resin 1 GallonZDSpoxy (B07VZBC6CZ)Amazon (727040490164)189.9889.98
    One-Hole Rubber Stoppers Size 5.5 – Pack of 28Grainger (16ZD52)Grainger (16ZD52)222.7145.42
    1.5” Straight Sipper Tube (custom order request)Ancare (OT-99)Ancare (OT-99)361.7763.72
    ¼” Conductive Copper TapeBertech (CFT-1/4)Digi-Key (4393-CFT-1/4-ND)111.8411.84
    Total596.66
    Average Price per Cage33.15
    • Prices are accurate as of November 2022.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    Infrared photobeam-based two-bottle choice device design and validation. A, Electronic parts and wiring diagram for the beam-break system. B, 3D rendering of beam-break device, including 3D-printed components, rubber stoppers and sippers, and photobeam sensors (red). C, Correlation between total bout number and change in bottle weight for each recording period. D, Correlation between total bout duration and change in bottle weight for each recording period. Solid lines represent fitted simple linear regression models, and dashed lines denote 95% confidence intervals. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data 1

    LIQ HD Arduino source code used in this study. Download Extended Data 1, ZIP file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    Bout microstructure does not significantly differ between the light and dark cycle. A total of 16 mice were given access to two water bottles for a one-week recording period. The data for the 32 bottles were pooled and binned into 12-h bins to determine differences in bout microstructure between the light and dark cycle. Mixed-effects models with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction using a compound symmetry covariance matrix and fit using restricted maximum likelihood (REML) revealed no significant main effect of light cycle for the average individual bout duration (F(1,31) = 0.8731, p = 0.3573), average individual bout size (F(1,31) = 0.2621, p = 0.6123), average bout lick frequency (F(1,31) = 1.019, p = 0.3206), or average ILI (F(1,31) = 0.1218, p = 0.7294; N = 16 mice, n = 32 bottles). Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 4
April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LIQ HD (Lick Instance Quantifier Home Cage Device): An Open-Source Tool for Recording Undisturbed Two-Bottle Drinking Behavior in a Home Cage Environment
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
LIQ HD (Lick Instance Quantifier Home Cage Device): An Open-Source Tool for Recording Undisturbed Two-Bottle Drinking Behavior in a Home Cage Environment
Nicholas Petersen, Danielle N. Adank, Ritika Raghavan, Danny G. Winder, Marie A. Doyle
eNeuro 30 March 2023, 10 (4) ENEURO.0506-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0506-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
LIQ HD (Lick Instance Quantifier Home Cage Device): An Open-Source Tool for Recording Undisturbed Two-Bottle Drinking Behavior in a Home Cage Environment
Nicholas Petersen, Danielle N. Adank, Ritika Raghavan, Danny G. Winder, Marie A. Doyle
eNeuro 30 March 2023, 10 (4) ENEURO.0506-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0506-22.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • bout microstructure
  • capacitive sensor
  • drinking behavior
  • lickometer
  • two-bottle choice

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Robust representation and nonlinear spectral integration of harmonic stacks in layer 4 of mouse primary auditory cortex
  • Changes in palatability processing across the estrous cycle are modulated by hypothalamic estradiol signaling
  • Automatic, but not autonomous: Implicit adaptation is modulated by goal-directed attentional demands
Show more Research Article: New Research

Novel Tools and Methods

  • Building an Ecosystem of Seizure Localization Methods: Neural Fragility as the First Step
  • What Is My Neuron Doing? Commentary on Huang et al. (2026)
  • An Open-Source Restraint System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Rats
Show more Novel Tools and Methods

Subjects

  • Novel Tools and Methods
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2026 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.