Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro

eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Review, Cognition and Behavior

The Epigenetics of Anxiety Pathophysiology: A DNA Methylation and Histone Modification Focused Review

Nikita S. Persaud and Hannah M. Cates
eNeuro 3 June 2022, 10 (4) ENEURO.0109-21.2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0109-21.2021
Nikita S. Persaud
Biology Department, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York 11530
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah M. Cates
Biology Department, Adelphi University, Garden City, New York 11530
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Hannah M. Cates
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Summary of stress models used to create anxiety models in rodents

    Stress
    model
    DescriptionSource
    CMS; CUS; CVSOriginally developed by Paul Willner as a model for depression, involves the subjugation of animals to a series of multiple, unpredictable stressors over a prolonged period;
    May vary in the combination and duration of stressors;
    Many limitations, such as difficulty to replicate
    Willner, 1997;
    Lezak et al., 2017
    CSDSInitially developed to model depression by Avgustinovich et al. (2005); was popularly adapted to investigate anxiety phenotypes by Krishnan et al. (2007);
    Study animal is introduced to the cage of a larger, aggressive animal (often a different strain of rat or mouse);
    Study animal is consider the “intruder”; aggressor animal is considered a “resident”;
    Exposure lasts for 10 min for 10 d, but may differ based on the researcher’s goals;
    Some animals may overcome CSDS-induced anxiety and are considered models for studying anxiety resilience;
    Limitations: sex-related differences (females tend not to participate in territorial related aggression); and injury to the model animal by the aggressor animal
    Avgustinovich et al., 2005; Krishnan et al., 2007; Lezak et al., 2017
    Prenatal stressOriginally used in rats by William Thompson, this stress model involves the application of a stressor to a pregnant dam; later adapted to study anxiety-like behaviors in offspring by other researchers (Vallée et al., 1997);
    Considered a developmental form of stress;
    Stressors include, e.g., footshock, restraint stress, subjection to EDCs; for more comprehensive reading on variations used in this model, please refer to Weinstock (2017)
    Thompson et al., 1962;
    Vallée et al., 1997;
    Lezak et al., 2017
    Postnatal stressAdministration of a stressor following the birth of pups and was first reportedly used by Krzysztof Janus (1987);
    Considered a developmental form of early life stress;
    The most commonly employed stressor is maternal separation in rodents, the time of separation is crucial for inducing anxiety-like phenotypes: separation at P3 to P4 tends to induce anxiety-like behaviors, while separation at P11 to P12 has been shown to cause the opposite effect of hyporesponsiveness
    Murthy and Gould, 2018; Lezak et al., 2017;
    van Oers et al., 1998
    • CUS, Chronic unpredictable stress; CVS, chronic variable stress; P, postnatal day.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Summary of assays used to measure the anxiety phenotype in rodent models

    TestCharacteristicsSource
    Light/dark box assayBox apparatus is divided into two sections: the smaller dark “protected” side (minimally lit with black walls), and the larger light ‘unprotected’ side (brightly illuminated with white walls);
    Relies on the principle of the innate aversion of a rodent to light and exposure to predators as a prey animals;
    Shorter latency periods entering the light side, and/or longer periods spent here, are interpreted as reduced anxiety-like behaviors;
    Measures the approach–avoidance behavior
    Crawley and Goodwin, 1980;
    Campos et al., 2013;
    Lezak et al., 2017
    EPM testConsists of two open, or unenclosed arms opposing two enclosed arms in the shape of a plus sign;
    Apparatus is elevated several feet from the ground;
    Animals are placed at the left of the EPM and allowed to explore freely for 5 min;
    Exposure created by open arms is associated with anxiety-like behavior, such as increased defecation and corticosteroid levels;
    More time spent in, as well as higher percentage of entries into the open arms of the EPM, are interpreted as reduced anxiety-like indices;
    Measures approach–avoidance behaviors
    Handley and Mithani, 1984;
    Korte, 2001;
    Campos et al., 2013;
    Lezak et al., 2017
    Open field testConsists of an open box divided into layers of rings from the left of the box to the corners;
    The time spent in the middle where hypothetically the animal is most exposed and vulnerable, is compared with the amount of time spent hugging the safer corners of the box;
    The number of times ventured towards the left of the box is also recorded;
    Reduced anxiety is inferred if the animal tends to venture out from peripheral zones, or spend longer periods in the more central zones of the open box;
    Relies on instinctual fear responses to predators 
    Lezak et al., 2017
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Summary of gene abbreviations

    Protein productGene denotation
    Glutamate receptor subunitsGrik1, Grik2, Grin1, Grin2b, Grin3a, Grm5, Nr2b
    GABA receptor subunitGabra2, Gabbr1, Gabbr2
    Mineralocorticoid receptorNr3c2
    Glucocorticoid receptorNr3c1
    Jagged-1JAG1
    B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 11ABcl11A
    Corticotropin-releasing hormone/corticotropin-releasing factorCRH/CRF
    Glutamic acid decarboxylaseGAD67
    CRH receptorCrhr1
    FK506 binding protein 5FKBP5
    Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase SUV39H1SUV39H1
    Euchromatic histone-lysine N-methyltransferaseEHMT2, G9a
    G9a-like proteinEHMT1, GLP
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Summary of DNA methylation patterns and differential gene expression levels

    MarkerSample retrievedAnxiety modelReference
    ↕Dnmt1Hippocampus (CA1, CA3)
    Amygdala (medial, basolateral and lateral nucleus)
    bLR animals (rats: P7 to P14)Simmons et al., 2012
    ↓Dnmt3aPeripheral bloodAnxious young adults (measured with HADS-A)Murphy et al., 2015
    mPFCAdult CSDS (9 weeks) mice (killed 4 weeks after CSDS)Elliott et al., 2016
    ↓Dnmt3a
    ↓Dnmt3b ↓Grin2b ↓Gabar2 ↑Grin1
    HippocampusLow-methyl diet adult mice (6 and 12 weeks) (low anxiety)Ishii et al., 2014
    ↑NR3C11F (Me)Peripheral whole bloodAdolescents (mean age = 16 years) who reported SLE'svan der Knaap et al., 2014
    ↓NR3C11F (Me)Leukocytic bloodAdults (age range = 18–65 years) who reported SLEs and diagnosed with variable ADsTyrka et al., 2016
    ↑NR3C1 (Me)
    ↓GRα
    PBMCsAdults (mean age = 35 years) diagnosed with GADWang et al., 2017
    ↓GR ↑FKBP5PlacentaNR3C1+/− miceSchmidt et al., 2019
    ↑FKBP5AmygdalaAdult rats (25 weeks) born to dams exposed to predator odors (prenatal/in utero stress)St-Cyr et al., 2017
    Amygdala (basolateral)Viral overexpression of FKBP51Hartmann et al., 2015
    ↓Dnmt1 ↑Gabra2
    ↓GABA
    Whole brainH67D male mutant mice (low anxiety)Ye et al., 2018
    ↑Dnmt1 ↓GAD67Amygdala (basolateral)Female mice (P45) exposed to BPA in uteroZhou et al., 2013
    Female mice (P60/P70) exposed prenatally/in utero to maternal restraint stressZhu et al., 2018
    ↑Crf ↓Dnmt3bHypothalamus (PVN)Adult CSDS miceElliott et al., 2010
    ↑Crf ↑CortisolHypothalamusPRS adolescent rats (P38) born to dams subjected to restraint stressXu et al., 2014
    ↑Crf ↑CRHR1,
    ↓Dnmt3b
    Hypothalamus (PVN)Male adult (P90) rats exposed in utero to gestational hypoxiaWang et al., 2013
    ↓CRHR1 (Me)Peripheral whole bloodAdults (mean age = 35 years) diagnosed with panic disorderSchartner et al., 2017
    ↑Crhr1Amygdala (basolateral)HAB mice bred for a high anxiety trait, LAB mice exposed to CMSSotnikov et al., 2014
    GRIN1, GRM5
    ↓BCL11A, ↓JAG1
    Amygdala (central)Anxious temperament rhesus macaques (mean age = 1.3 years)Alisch et al., 2014
    • Genes are italicized. (me) denotes methylation reported. HADS-A, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; P, postnatal day.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Summary of differential histone modifications marks and histone modifying enzymes in stress/anxiety models

    MarkerSample retrievedStress modelReference
    ↑H4ac ↑BDNF IVPrefrontal cortexFootshock conditioned male mice (10–12 weeks) with fear extinction learning (low anxiety)Bredy et al., 2007
    ↓H3K9me2 ↑BDNF IVHippocampusMale rats (P21 and 2 months) subjected to maternal separationSuri et al., 2013
    ↑H3K9me2 ↓BDNF IVMale rats (15 months) subjected to maternal separation
    ↓H3K9me ↓H3K9me3HippocampusAdult male rats (P70) subjected to CRSHunter et al., 2009
    ↓H3K9me ↓H3K9me3Prefrontal cortexYoung female rats subjected to early maternal separation (low fear-conditioned startle)Kao et al., 2012
    ↑H3K9me3 ↓GRAmygdala; hippocampusAdult bHR (low anxiety) ratsChaudhury et al., 2014
    ↓G9a ↓H3K9me2Whole brainAdult mice treated with G9a inhibitors (low-anxiety phenotype)Wang et al., 2018
    ↑G9a ↑H3K9me2Nucleus accumbensViral G9a overexpression in male adult rats (high anxiety phenotype)Anderson et al., 2018
    ↓HDAC2 ↑HDAC3 ↓HDAC8 ↓Suv39 h1HippocampusYoung adult rats (2 months) subjected to early maternal separation (anxiety phenotype)Suri et al., 2013
    ↓H3K9ac ↓GR ↑CRF ↑SIRT6Amygdala (central)Male adult mice were infused with CORT (chronic anxiety)Tran et al., 2015
    ↓H3K9ac ↓H4K12acHippocampusAdult male rats subjected to CVSFerland and Schrader, 2011
    ↓HDAC5Nucleus accumbensMice subjected to CSDS (chronic anxiety)Renthal et al., 2007
    ↑HDAC2 ↓H3K9acAmygdala (central)Adult P rats bred for alcohol preference (anxiety phenotype)Moonat et al., 2013
    • P, postnatal day.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (4)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 4
April 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Epigenetics of Anxiety Pathophysiology: A DNA Methylation and Histone Modification Focused Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
The Epigenetics of Anxiety Pathophysiology: A DNA Methylation and Histone Modification Focused Review
Nikita S. Persaud, Hannah M. Cates
eNeuro 3 June 2022, 10 (4) ENEURO.0109-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0109-21.2021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
The Epigenetics of Anxiety Pathophysiology: A DNA Methylation and Histone Modification Focused Review
Nikita S. Persaud, Hannah M. Cates
eNeuro 3 June 2022, 10 (4) ENEURO.0109-21.2021; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0109-21.2021
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
    • Findings
    • Summary of findings
    • Limitations and Future Directions
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • anxiety disorders
  • DNA methylation
  • histone modifications
  • neuroepigenetics
  • review
  • rodent models

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Review

  • P2X7 Receptor and Purinergic Signaling: Orchestrating Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Transcriptional Profile of the Developing Subthalamic Nucleus
  • TMS Does Not Increase BOLD Activity at the Site of Stimulation: A Review of All Concurrent TMS-fMRI Studies
Show more Review

Cognition and Behavior

  • Dopamine Receptor Type 2-Expressing Medium Spiny Neurons in the Ventral Lateral Striatum Have a Non-REM Sleep-Induce Function
  • How Sucrose Preference Is Gained and Lost: An In-Depth Analysis of Drinking Behavior during the Sucrose Preference Test in Mice
  • Similarities and Distinctions between Cortical Neural Substrates That Underlie Generation of Malevolent Creative Ideas
Show more Cognition and Behavior

Subjects

  • Cognition and Behavior
  • Reviews

  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2023 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.