Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Sensory and Motor Systems

A Conserved Role for Stomatin Domain Genes in Olfactory Behavior

Xiaoyu Liang, Morgan Taylor, Rebekah Napier-Jameson, Canyon Calovich-Benne and Adam Norris
eNeuro 1 March 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0457-22.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0457-22.2023
Xiaoyu Liang
Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Morgan Taylor
Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Morgan Taylor
Rebekah Napier-Jameson
Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Canyon Calovich-Benne
Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Norris
Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    A subset of stomatin domain genes are expressed in C. elegans olfactory neurons. A, Domain organization of stomatin domain genes. Colored in shades of gray are the central conserved stomatin domain and the hydrophobic domain that mediates association with the membrane. Flanking these are the divergent N and C termini. B, Gene tree for family of stomatin domain gene homologues, TF105750 (stomatin-like 2) from TreeFam (Ruan et al., 2008). Some organism silhouettes created with BioRender. C, D, RNA Seq data from CenGEN consortium sorted neuron populations, mapped to the worm genome with STAR and gene reads counted by HTSeq. C, Olfactory neurons AWA and AWB. D, Motor neurons DD and VD. See also Extended Data Figure 1-1A for comparison with olfactory neuron marker gene FPKM. E, Cluster of three Stoml3/Stomatin-like genes in the C. elegans genome on chromosome X. F, Two immediately adjacent Stoml3/Stomatin-like genes in the Drosophila genome on chromosome X. See also Extended Data Figure 1-1.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Specific stomatin domain genes required for olfaction in C. elegans. A, Schematic of the chemotaxis assay. Worms are placed in the center of an unseeded worm plate, given a choice between point sources of odor (represented by +) and unscented diluent (represented by 0), and given 1 h to chemotax. B, C, Chemotaxis assays for the attractive odor pyrazine (1:1000; B) or the repulsive odor octanol (1:1000; C). The chemotaxis index = ((worms in + quadrant)(worms in 0 quadrant))/(worms in all quadrants), with a maximum value of 1 (attractive) and minimum value of −1 (repulsive). D, Schematic of the smell on a stick assay for repulsive odors. E, Smell on a stick assay for octanol. F, AWA neurons labeled by translational ODR-10::GFP fusion. White arrowheads denote sensory cilia (where ODR-10 localizes). Gray arrowheads denote cell bodies. The cell body in the mec-2 image is slightly out of the plane of focus. Scale bar represents 50 μm. See also Extended Data Figure 2-1C,D. G, GCaMP5 imaging of AWC(on) neurons using a microfluidic “olfactory chip.” Isoamyl alcohol (1:1000) administration represented by the gray box. Error bars represent SEM N = 12 young adult worms (5 wild-type, 7 mec-2 mutants). F, Schematic of mec-2 alternative splicing and (G) subsequent protein isoforms. H, I, mec-2 alternative isoforms at the level of pre-mRNA splicing (H) and protein isoforms (I). The isoforms affect the divergent C terminus of mec-2. J, CenGEN RNA Seq data reveals mec-2 is found primarily as the mec-2B isoform in AWA and AWB olfactory neurons. K, Smell on a stick assay, 1:100,000 octanol, statistical test (ANOVA) performed against mec-2() mutants. Re-expression of any mec-2 isoform in AWB neuron partially rescues response. Asterisks indicate p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA. See also Extended Data Figure 2-1.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Stomatin domain genes expressed in mouse neurons, and Stoml3 knock-out mice. A–D, Cell-specific sequencing of mouse olfactory neurons (A, B) and motor neurons (C, D). Omp is used as a positive marker for olfactory neurons, and Chat as a positive marker for cholinergic motor neurons. E, Stoml3 gene in mouse, indicating the region we deleted in orange, and the primer sets used to detect both the wild-type and mutant genomic DNA (black arrows). F, Sanger sequencing confirming the ∼5.4-kb deletion. G, Genotyping gels for identifying homozygous Stoml3 mutants and their wild-type littermates.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Olfactory assays for wild-type and Stoml3 knock-out mice. A, B, Innate olfactory attraction tests. Mean time sniffing a scented block in wild-type mice (n = 16) and Stoml3 knock-out mice (n = 11) during the 3-min test period. Water was used as a control scent. Peanut butter and mouse urine were used as attractive scents. Both wild-type and Stoml3 knock-out mice showed attraction response to peanut butter and mouse urine. Asterisk indicates p < 0.05. C, Buried cereal test. Mean time wild-type (n = 14) and Stoml3 knock-out mice (n = 10) took to find the pellet. Surface pellet test is a positive control, confirming that the cereal pellet is attractive to the mice. ns represents no significant difference between wild types and Stoml3 knock-outs using Mann–Whitney U test. D, Habituation/dishabituation test. Mean time sniffing a scented cartridge in wild-type mice (n = 16) and Stoml3 knock-out mice (n = 12) during 30-s test period across seven trials. Almond extract was used on trials 1–6, and banana extract was introduced as a novel scent on trial 7. Significant difference of sniffing time in wild types is observed when novel scent is introduced on trial 7 (**p < 0.01), while no significant difference is observed between trial 6 and trial 7 in Stoml3 knock-out mice. E, Block test. Mean time sniffing home cage blocks A–C and novel block E in wild-type mice (n = 16) and Stoml3 knock-out mice (n = 12). Wild types spend more than 2-fold time exploring novel block (E) than Stoml3 knock-out mice (**p < 0.01, Mann–Whitney U test, error bars represent SEM). See also Extended Data Figure 4-1.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    Expression and location of Stomatin domain gene homologues. A, FPKMs for osm-6 as a positive control for a gene highly expressed in olfactory neurons (it serves as a sensory neuron marker gene) and lowly expressed in other neurons, including motor neurons. B, Additional cluster of Drosophila Podocin homologues on chromosome 3. Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 2-1

    Stomatin domain genes required for behavior in C. elegans. A, Fraction of worms that fail to leave the 1-cm diameter origin circle after 1 h. Note that the majority of sto-4 and unc-1 mutants fail to locomote away from origin, whereas both wild-type and chemotaxis defective mutants do not remain in origin. B, Maximal ΔF/F GCaMP signals during odor presentation of isoamyl alcohol (1:1000) as displayed in Figure 2G. Unpaired two-tail t test, p < 0.05. C, D, AWB and AWC neuronal cell bodies visualized by transgene oyIs44 (ord-1p::RFP), revealing no obvious morphological differences in cell body position, axons, or dendrites between wild-type (C) and mec-2 mutant worms (D). Download Figure 2-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Figure 4-1

    Stoml3 behavior and mec-2 expression. A, Latency to uncover pellet in cereal test measured on a daily basis, showing no significant differences between dynamics of wild-type and Stoml3 KO mice. B, In trial 6 of the block test, where no novel odor is present, time spent exploring the blocks is minimal. C, Single-cell sequencing data from CenGEN consortium data on mec-2 expression in representative neuron populations. Size of dot represents proportion of single cells in which mec-2 was detected, and heatmap represents scaled TPM of the mec-2 gene. A few sensory cell types are highlighted. Download Figure 4-1, TIF file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 3
March 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Conserved Role for Stomatin Domain Genes in Olfactory Behavior
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
A Conserved Role for Stomatin Domain Genes in Olfactory Behavior
Xiaoyu Liang, Morgan Taylor, Rebekah Napier-Jameson, Canyon Calovich-Benne, Adam Norris
eNeuro 1 March 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0457-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0457-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
A Conserved Role for Stomatin Domain Genes in Olfactory Behavior
Xiaoyu Liang, Morgan Taylor, Rebekah Napier-Jameson, Canyon Calovich-Benne, Adam Norris
eNeuro 1 March 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0457-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0457-22.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • behavior
  • bhemotaxis
  • msec-2
  • stomatin
  • stoml3
  • olfaction

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Deletion of endocannabinoid synthesizing enzyme DAGLα in Pcp2-positive cerebellar Purkinje cells decreases depolarization-induced short-term synaptic plasticity, reduces social preference, and heightens anxiety
  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
Show more Research Article: New Research

Sensory and Motor Systems

  • Combinatorial Approaches to Restore Corticospinal Function after Spinal Cord Injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
  • Interference underlies attenuation upon relearning in sensorimotor adaptation
Show more Sensory and Motor Systems

Subjects

  • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.