Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, Disorders of the Nervous System

Sex-Specific Timelines for Adaptations of Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Response to Stress and Changes in Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors

Emma Woodward, Claudia Rangel-Barajas, Amanda Ringland, Marian L. Logrip and Laurence Coutellier
eNeuro 20 February 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0300-22.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0300-22.2023
Emma Woodward
1Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Rangel-Barajas
3Department of Psychology, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia Rangel-Barajas
Amanda Ringland
2Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marian L. Logrip
3Department of Psychology, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
4Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Marian L. Logrip
Laurence Coutellier
1Department of Neuroscience, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
2Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Laurence Coutellier
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Effects of 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS on anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors in male and female mice. Top, Schematic representation of experimental design. a–c, In the EPM test, the time spent in the open arms (a), the distance traveled in the open arms (b), and the number of entries into the open arms (c) were significantly decreased after 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS in females (time in open arms: c > d, p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0001, respectively; distance in open arms: c > d, p = 0.0002 and p < 0.0001, respectively; entries into open arms: c > d, p = 0.0030 and p = 0.0007, respectively), while in males, only 8 weeks of UCMS decreased those end points when compared with controls (Cs) and males experiencing 4 weeks of UCMS (time in open arms: a > b, p = 0.0001 and p = 0.0001, respectively; distance in open arms: a > b, p = 0.0187; entries into open arms: a > b, p = 0.003). Altogether, females spent more time (*p = 0.0136), traveled a longer distance (***p < 0001), and made more entries (*p = 0.0108) in the open arms. d, Total distance moved was decreased in males after 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS (a > b, p = 0.0004) but tended to be increased in females after 4 weeks of UCMS (c < d, p = 0.056). N = 9–16 mice/group [female: c, N = 9; UCMS (4), N = 10; UCMS (8), N = 10; male: c, N = 10; UCMS (4), N = 16; UCMS (8), N = 10]. e–h, In the OF test, males and females were equally affected by 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS, as shown by decreased time spent in the center [e; C vs UCMS (4 weeks), **p = 0.0078; C vs UCMS (8 weeks), ***p < 0.0001], decreased the number of entries in the center [f; C vs UCMS (8 weeks), **p = 0.0031, UCMS (4 weeks) vs UCMS (8 weeks), *p = 0.0163], increased the thigmotaxis ratio [g; C vs UCMS (8 weeks), **p = 0.0055] and changes in overall activity [h; UCMS (4 weeks) vs UCMS (8 weeks), *p = 0.0343]. N = 10–20 mice/group [female: C, N = 13; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 14; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 14; male: C, N = 10; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 20; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 15]. i, Marble burying. Females exposed to 4 weeks of UCMS and males exposed to 8 weeks of UCMS buried more marbles (females: C vs UCMS (4 weeks), *p = 0.0159; UCMS (4 weeks) vs UCMS (8 weeks), *p = 0.0281; males: C vs UCMS (8 weeks), *p = 0.0404). N = 7–8/group [females: C, N = 8; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 8; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 8; male: C, N = 7; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 7; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 8]. j, Splash test. In the splash test, females groomed more than males (**p = 0.0076). Females appeared more sensitive to the effects of UCMS, as 4 weeks of UCMS significantly decreased the time spent grooming (a vs b, p = 0.0213). N = 7–8/group [females: c, N = 8; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 8; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 8; male: c, N = 7; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 7; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 8]. k, In the CPA test, only females showed increased aversion toward a low dose of LiCl after 8 weeks of UCMS (vs C, *p = 0.0106; vs UCMS (4 weeks), *p = 0.0477). N = 8–15 mice/group [females: c, N = 14; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 14; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 13; males: c, N = 9; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 8; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 15]. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Cellular changes in female and male prefrontal PV+ neurons after 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS are indicative of sex-specific patterns of stress-induced increases in their activity. a, Left, Representative picture of immunofluorescent signal of PV (green), ΔFosB (red), and their colocalization in the PFC of mice. Right, Experimental timeline. b–d, PV/ΔFosB immunohistochemistry analyses. b, Increased percentage of prefrontal PV+ neurons expressing the marker of chronic activity, ΔFosB, in the whole mPFC after 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS in females [UCMS (4 weeks) vs controls, ***p = 0.0002; UCMS (8 weeks) vs controls, ***p = 0.0003], and after 8 weeks of UCMS in males [UCMS (8 weeks) vs controls, **p = 0.0022]. c, d, This is paralleled by subregion analyses wherein the PrL (c) UCMS did not change the percentage of PV+ neurons expressing ΔFosB in males but increased it in females [control vs UCMS (8 weeks) **p = 0.0046], and in the IL (d) 8 weeks of UCMS significantly increased percentage of PV+ neurons expressing ΔFosB in both males and females (males, **p = 0.0014; females, **p = 0.0024), while 4 weeks of UCMS increased this number in females (**p = 0.0020). We also observed significant sex differences, particularly after 4 weeks of UCMS, when females displayed more PV neurons expressing FosB than males in the whole PFC, PrL region, and IL region (whole PFC, ap = 0.0015; PrL, ap = 0.0085; IL, ap = 0.0167). N = 4–5/group [female: c, N = 4; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 4; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 4; male: c, N = 5; UCMS (4 weeks), N = 4; UCMS (8 weeks), N = 4]. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Activation of prefrontal PV+ neurons in male mice affects the expression of anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors under baseline and stressful conditions. Top left, Representative image of mCherry-DREADD virus expression in the PrL and IL regions of the PFC. Top right, Schematic representation of experimental design. a–d, In the EPM test, UCMS interacted with the chronic activation of prefrontal PV+ neurons to modulate the time spent in the open arms (a; *p = 0.0441; **p = 0.0052), but no other significant interactions were observed. e–h, In the OF test, UCMS decreased time in the center (e; *p = 0.011), increased thigmotaxis ratio (g; *p = 0.0244), and increased overall activity (h; **p = 0.0019). i, j, In the marble-burying test, a significant UCMS effect was driven by a higher number of marbles buried by UCMS/hM3DGq mice compared with their nonstressed controls (**p = 0.0038; i); a similar effect was observed in the splash test (j), with decreased time spent grooming by UCMS/hM3DGq mice compared with their nonstressed controls (**p = 0.0088). k, In the CPA test, significant effects of stress and virus were detected; Tukey’s post hoc analyses revealed that the aversion score of mice from the UCMS/hM3DGq was lower than that of control mice (*p = 0.021). N = 8–11/group (C/mCherry, N = 8; UCMS/mCherry, N = 11; C/hM3DGq, N = 8; UCMS/hM3DGq, N = 9). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Altered neuronal excitability patterns of IL layer II/III PV+ neurons after 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS. a, Representative images of recorded neurons (left, position in slice; center, fluorescence indicating PV presence; right, IR-DIC image of patched neuron) and schematic of experimental design. b–d, Representative traces of PV+ neuron firing in male neurons showing the characteristic nonadapting firing patterns of PV+ neurons (control) at threshold (i.e., 50 pA, red) and suprathreshold (i.e., 400 pA, black) current injection (b) and altered firing patterns after 4 weeks [UCMS (4 weeks)] and 8 weeks [UCMS (8 weeks)] of UCMS (c, d). e, Male PV+ neurons showed no significant differences in the number of APs after either 4 or 8 weeks of UCMS at threshold current injections, but a significant reduction in the number of events at suprathreshold step currents (i.e., from 250 pA) after only 8 weeks of UCMS [#p < 0.001, control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test; exact p values: control vs UCMS (8 weeks): 250 pA, p = 0.0017; 300 pA, p = 0.0003; 350 pA, p = 0.0003; 400 pA, p = 0.0001]. f–h, Representative traces of PV+ neuron firing in female neurons showing characteristic PV+ neuron firing patterns in controls (f), as above, and alterations after UCMS (4 weeks) and UCMS (8 weeks; g, h). i, Female PV+ neurons showed maladaptive firing patterns with increased numbers of APs at lower current injections [*p < 0.05, Control vs UCMS (4 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test; exact p values: control vs UCMS (4 weeks): 50 pA, p = 0.0016; 100 pA, p = 0.0009; 150 pA, p = 0.036], but a reduced number of events at higher, suprathreshold current injections [**p < 0.001, control vs UCMS (4 weeks); #p < 0.001, control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc tests; exact p values: control vs UCMS (4 weeks): 300 pA, p = 0.036; 350 pA, p = 0.0059; 400 pA, p = 0.012; control vs UCMS (8 weeks): 350 pA, p = 0.021; 400 pA, p = 0.017]. j, Total number of APs fired across the 500 ms stimulus duration for all stimulus intensities decreased after 8 weeks of UCMS, regardless of sex [@p < 0.05, Control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS; exact p value: p = 0.0090]. k, RMP was significantly increased after UCMS (8 weeks), independent of sex [@p < 0.05, control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS, exact p = 0.0080]. l, Input resistance was significantly increased after UCMS (4 weeks), independent of sex [@p < 0.05, control vs UCMS (4 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS; exact p = 0.015]. Data in histograms are presented as the mean ± SEM for control (C), 4 weeks of UCMS (4 weeks) and 8 weeks of UCMS (8 weeks) by sex (male, green; female, orange). N = 4–6 mice/group, n = 11–19 recorded cells/group [females: C: N = 6, n = 19; 4 weeks: N = 5, n = 17; 8 weeks: N = 5, n = 15; males: C: N = 4, n = 14; 4 weeks: N = 4, n = 11; 8 weeks: N = 5, n = 17). Individual mice contributed 2–6 cells to the experiment (mean n per N, 3.23; median n per N, 3).

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    UCMS reduced AP height as a feature of the adaptation of IL layer II/III PV+ neurons. Male and female PV-tdTomato mice were exposed to handling [control (C)], 4 weeks of UCMS (4 weeks), or 8 weeks of UCMS (8 weeks); and 24 h later, IL layer II/III PV+ neurons were selected for recording based on the presence of red fluorescence. AP magnitudes were assessed for the first 3 spikes after current onset at threshold (50 pA) and suprathreshold (400 pA) current intensities. a, The amplitude of the first AP was reduced after 8 weeks of UCMS, regardless of sex [@@p < 0.01, control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS; exact p = 0.0014]. b, The height of the third evoked AP at threshold current intensity was reduced after 8 weeks of UCMS, regardless of sex [@@p < 0.01, control vs UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS; exact p = 0.0015]. c, The amplitude of the third AP evoked by suprathreshold stimuli was reduced after both 4 and 8 weeks of UCMS, regardless of sex [@@p < 0.01, control vs UCMS (4 weeks) and UCMS (8 weeks), Tukey’s post hoc test for main effect of UCMS; exact p < 0.0001, UCMS (4 weeks); p < 0.0001, UCMS (8 weeks)], with effects for 4 weeks but not 8 weeks of UCMS largely driven by females despite lack of UCMS by sex interaction [control vs UCMS (4 weeks): females, p < 0.0001; males, p = 0.011; Control vs UCSM (8 weeks): females, p < 0.0001; males, p < 0.0001). d, Representative traces illustrating the 3 APs measured at threshold (left, red trace) and suprathreshold (right, black trace) current intensities in neurons from male mice. e, In male mice, AP heights were progressively shorter from AP1 to AP3 (Tukey’s test exact p values: AP1 vs AP2, p = 0.015; AP1 vs AP3, p = 0.0003; AP2 vs AP3, p = 0.0021). UCMS did not significantly impact AP height. Data are displayed with AP heights normalized to threshold AP1 height. f, AP height, expressed as a ratio to the first AP generated under threshold current stimulation, was significantly reduced after UCMS (8 weeks) in male mice [control vs UCMS (8 weeks): AP1, p = 0.080; AP2, p = 0.0014; AP3, p = 0.0003]. g, Representative traces illustrating APs measured at threshold (red trace) and suprathreshold (black trace) current intensities in neurons from female mice. h, In females, UCMS did not significantly impact AP heights at threshold, with data displayed normalized to the height of the first AP, although AP height did decrease with each spike (Tukey’s test exact p values: AP1 vs AP2, p = 0.0022; AP1 vs AP3, p = 0.0002; AP2 vs AP3, p < 0.0001). i, At suprathreshold current intensity, AP height was decreased relative to control following both UCMS (4 weeks: AP1, p = 0.0084; AP2, p < 0.0001; AP3, p < 0.0001) and UCMS (8 weeks: AP1, p = 0.022; AP2, p < 0.0001; AP3, p < 0.0001), without differences between UCMS (4 weeks) and UCMS (8 weeks), in female mice. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for control (C), 4 weeks of UCMS (4 weeks), and 8 weeks of UCMS (8 weeks) by sex (male, green; female, orange). N = 4–6 mice/group, n = 11–19 recorded cells/group [females: C: N = 6, n = 19; 4 weeks: N = 5, n = 17; 8 weeks: N = 5, n = 15; males: C: N = 4, n = 14; 4 weeks: N = 4, n = 11; 8 weeks: N = 5, n = 17]. Individual mice contributed 2–6 cells to the experiment (mean n per N, 3.23; median n per N, 3).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Timeline of stressors followed for the 4 week UCMS protocol

    DayStressor
    1CT
    2BR
    3EC
    4CT
    5RN
    6DR
    7CT
    8RN
    9DR
    10RN
    11BR
    12CT
    13BR
    14EC
    15DR
    16CT
    17RN
    18DR
    19RN
    20BR
    21EC
    22CT
    23EC
    24BR
    25RN
    26BR
    27RN
    28DR
    • The same timeline was repeated for the 8 week UCMS protocol. CT, 20° cage tilt along the vertical axis for 6 h; BR, tube restraint under bright light conditions for 4 min; EC, empty cage (absence of nesting) for 8 h; RN, remove nesting for 24 h; DR, tube restraint in dark conditions for 8 min.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Statistical analysis of behavioral changes after 0, 4, or 8 weeks of UCMS in male and female mice

    Two-way ANOVAUCMSSexUCMS × sex
    EPM
     Total distanceF(1,59) = 5.741
    p = 0.019 (F > M)
    F(2,59) = 12.35
    p < 0.0001
     Time in open armsF(2,59) = 19.32
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,59) = 6.477
    p = 0.0136 (F > M)
    F(2,59) = 4.976
    p = 0.010
     Entries in open armsF(2,59) = 15.72
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,59) = 6.924
    p = 0.0108 (F > M)
     Distance in open armsF(2,59) = 16.25
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,59) = 21.10
    p < 0.0001 (F > M)
    F(2,59) = 3.665
    p = 0.0316
    OF
     Total distanceF(2,80) = 3.241
    p = 0.0443
     Time in centerF(2,80) = 11.07
    p < 0.0001
     Entries in centerF(2,80) = 6.674
    p = 0.0021
     Thigmotaxis ratioF(2,80) = 5.261
    p = 0.0071
    CPA
     Post-pre time in LiCl sideF(2,67) = 3.778
    p = 0.0279
    F(1,67) = 4.299
    p = 0.0420 (F > M)
    F(2,67) = 3.479
    p = 0.0365
     Marble burying
     No. of marbles buriedF(2,40) = 3.972
    p = 0.0267
    F(2,40) = 3.948
    p = 0.0272
     Splash test
     Time spent groomingF(2,40) = 4.496
    p = 0.0177
    F(2,40) = 7.946
    p = 0.0076 (F > M)
    • F, Female; M, male.

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Statistical analysis of immunohistochemistry analysis of expression of FosB in prefrontal PV+ neurons after 0, 4, or 8 weeks of UCMS in male and female mice

    Two-way ANOVAUCMSSexUCMS × sex
    Percentage PV/FosB whole PFCF(2,18) = 22.45
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,18) = 15.17
    p = 0.0012
    F(2,18) = 3.327
    p = 0.0603
    Percentage PV/FosB PrLF(2, 218) = 9.711
    p = 0.0015
    F(1,18) = 8.676
    p = 0.0090
    F(2,18) = 2.982
    p = 0.0776
    Percentage PV/FosB ILF(2,18) = 18.51
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,18) = 9.248
    p = 0.0070
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Statistical analysis of behavioral changes after 0 or 4 weeks of UCMS with or without chronic DREADD activation of prefrontal PV+ neurons in male mice

    Two-way ANOVAUCMSDREADDUCMS × DREADD
    EPM
     Time in open armsF(1,32) = 6.831
    p = 0.013
    F(1,32) = 5.004
    p = 0.032
     Entries in open arms
     Distance in open armsF(1,32) = 9.081
    p = 0.005
    F(1,32) = 12.40
    p = 0.001
     Total distance
    OF
     Time in centerF(1,32) = 7.282
    p = 0.011
     Entries in centerF(1,32) = 4.154
    p = 0.049
     Thigmotaxis ratioF(1,32) = 5.585
    p = 0.024
     Total distanceF(1,32) = 11.47
    p = 0.002
    F(1,32) = 6.143
    p = 0.019
    CPA
     Post-Pre time in LiCl sideF(1,26) = 5.220
    p = 0.031
    F(1,26) = 5.039
    p = 0.033
     Marble burying
     No. of marbles buriedF(1,32) = 9.285
    p = 0.005
    F(1,32) = 3.227
    p = 0.081
     Splash test
     Time groomingF(1,26) = 7.465
    p = 0.011
    F(1,26) = 3.609
    p = 0.068
    • View popup
    Table 5

    Statistical analyses of AP firing after 0, 4, or 8 weeks of UCMS in IL layer II/III PV+ neurons from male and female mice

    TestUCMSSexUCMS × sexStimulusStimulus × UCMSStimulus × sexStimulus × sex × UCMS
    AP firing: sex as a factor
     Three-way ANOVA with repeated measuresF(2,87) = 7.71,
    p < 0.001
    F(1,87) = 2.20,
    p = 0.14
    F(2,87) = 2.68,
    p = 0.074
    F(1.84,159.6) = 41.47,
    p < 0.001
    F(3.67,159.6) = 9.63,
    p < 0.001
    F(1.84,159.6) = 0.65,
    p = 0.51
    F(3.67,159.6) =1.42,
    p = 0.23
     AUC analysis, two-way ANOVAF(2,87) = 6.99,
    p = 0.0015
    F(1,87) = 2.41,
    p = 0.12
    F(2,87) = 2.64,
    p = 0.077
    AP Firing by sex
     Males, two-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 10.86,
    p = 0.0002
    F(1.75,68.2) = 12.34,
    p < 0.0001
    F(14,273) = 3.88,
    p < 0.0001
     Females, two-way ANOVAF(2,48) = 1.27,
    p = 0.29
    F(1.91,91.9) = 35.67,
    p < 0.0001
    F(14,336) = 8.89,
    p < 0.0001
     AP height at threshold
     Three-way ANOVA with repeated measuresF(2,87) = 4.99,
    p = 0.009
    F(1,87) = 0.93,
    p = 0.34
    F(2,87) = 0.008,
    p = 0.99
    F(1.05,91.4) = 25.05,
    p < 0.001
    F(2.10,91.4) = 0.18,
    p = 0.85
    F(1.05,91.4) = 1.71,
    p = 0.19
    F(2.10,91.4) = 0.51,
    p = 0.61
    AP height at threshold by sex
     Males, two-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 2.11,
    p = 0.14
    F(1.12,43.8) = 14.15,
    p = 0.0003
    F(4,78) = 1.27,
    p = 0.29
     Females, two-way ANOVAF(2,48) = 3.03,
    p = 0.058
    F(1.03,49.5) = 15.30,
    p = 0.0002
    F(4,96) = 0.089,
    p = 0.99
    AP height at suprathreshold
     Three-way ANOVA with repeated measuresF(2,87) = 20.04,
    p < 0.001
    F(1,89) = 0.04,
    p = 0.85
    F(2,89) = 0.97,
    p = 0.38
    F(1.16,101.0) = 254.23,
    p < 0.001
    F(2.32,101.0) = 28.87,
    p < 0.001
    F(1.16,101.0) = 1.19,
    p = 0.29
    F(2.32,101.1) = 1.53,
    p = 0.22
    AP height at suprathreshold by sex
     Males, two-way ANOVAF(2,39) = 7.51,
    p = 0.0017
    F(1.05,40.8) = 141.1,
    p < 0.0001
    F(4,78) = 13.28,
    p < 0.0001
     Females, two-way ANOVAF(2,48) = 20.92,
    p < 0.0001
    F(1.21,58.1) = 131.1,
    p < 0.0001
    F(4,96) = 18.12,
    p < 0.0001
    • Greenhouse–Geisser corrected for sphericity violations, as needed, indicated by noninteger degrees of freedom. Stimulus indicates intensity of current injected for AP firing and spike number for AP height.

    • View popup
    Table 6

    Statistical analyses of cell membrane and action potential properties after 0, 4, or 8 weeks of UCMS in IL layer II/III PV+ neurons from male and female mice

    PropertyUCMSSexUCMS × sexEffect
    Resting membrane potentialF(2,87) = 6.10
    p = 0.0033
    F(1,87) = 2.10,
    p = 0.15
    F(2,87) = 2.37,
    p = 0.10
    UCMS8 > control
    Input resistanceF(2,87) = 4.12
    p = 0.020
    F(1,87) = 0.12,
    p = 0.73
    F(2,87) = 0.53,
    p = 0.59
    UCMS4 > control
    Total APsF(2,87) = 6.06,
    p = 0.0034
    F(1,87) = 2.86,
    p = 0.094
    F(2,87) = 1.61
    p = 0.21
    UCMS8 > control
    First evoked AP amplitude (threshold)F(2,87) = 6.60
    p = 0.0021
    F(1,87) = 1.11
    p = 0.29
    F(2,87) = 0.16
    p = 0.85
    Control > UCMS8
    Third evoked AP amplitude (threshold)F(2,87) = 6.63
    p = 0.0021
    F(1,87) = 0.22
    p = 0.64
    F(2,87) = 0.079
    p = 0.92
    Control > UCMS8
    Third evoked AP amplitude (suprathreshold)F(2,87) = 39.32
    p < 0.0001
    F(1,87) = 0.61
    p = 0.44
    F(2,87) = 1.57
    p = 0.21
    Control > UCMS4 > UCMS8
    Maximum frequency at rheobaseF(2,87) = 2.86
    p = 0.063
    F(1,87) = 2.08,
    p = 0.15
    F(2,87) = 2.29
    p = 0.11
    Maximum frequencyF(2,87) = 7.74
    p = 0.0008
    F(1,87) = 23.76,
    p = 0.056
    F(2,87) = 3.97
    p = 0.023
    Control, UCMS4 > UCMS8
    AP thresholdF(2,87) = 2.51
    p = 0.087
    F(1,87) = 1.68,
    p = 0.20
    F(2,87) = 1.38,
    p = 0.26
    AP half-width*F(2,87) = 1.29
    p = 0.28
    F(1,87) = 0.52,
    p = 0.47
    F(2,87) = 3.48
    p = 0.035
     Females only,
     Kruskal–Wallis test
    H(3) = 0.052,
    p = 0.97
     Males only,
     Kruskal–Wallis test
    H(3) = 11.21,
    p = 0.0037
    UCMS8 > control
    • These tests were followed up by separate analyses by sex via Kruskal–Wallis tests. Comparisons in the Effect column are post hoc Tukey’s tests for parametric and Dunn’s multiple-comparisons tests for nonparametric statistics.

    • *Two-way ANOVA results are shown as non-normally distributed data, which could not be adjusted by mathematical transformation.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (3)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 3
March 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex-Specific Timelines for Adaptations of Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Response to Stress and Changes in Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Sex-Specific Timelines for Adaptations of Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Response to Stress and Changes in Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors
Emma Woodward, Claudia Rangel-Barajas, Amanda Ringland, Marian L. Logrip, Laurence Coutellier
eNeuro 20 February 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0300-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0300-22.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Sex-Specific Timelines for Adaptations of Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Response to Stress and Changes in Anxiety- and Depressive-Like Behaviors
Emma Woodward, Claudia Rangel-Barajas, Amanda Ringland, Marian L. Logrip, Laurence Coutellier
eNeuro 20 February 2023, 10 (3) ENEURO.0300-22.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0300-22.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • chronic stress
  • parvalbumin neurons
  • prefrontal cortex
  • sex differences
  • vulnerability

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • The speed of visual discrimination differs between foveola and perifovea: a combined EEG and behavioral investigation
  • Emotions in the brain are dynamic and contextually dependent: using music to measure affective transitions
  • Morphological and Molecular Distinctions of Parallel Processing Streams Reveal Two Koniocellular Pathways in the Tree Shrew dLGN
Show more Research Article: New Research

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Release of Extracellular Matrix Components after Human Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Gene variants related to primary familial brain calcification: perspectives from bibliometrics and meta-analysis
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.