Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: New Research, History, Teaching, and Public Awareness

Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based Stem Cell and Neuroscience Education

Matthew A. T. Elliott, Hunter E. Schweiger, Ash Robbins, Samira Vera-Choqqueccota, Drew Ehrlich, Sebastian Hernandez, Kateryna Voitiuk, Jinghui Geng, Jess L. Sevetson, Cordero Core, Yohei M. Rosen, Mircea Teodorescu, Nico O. Wagner, David Haussler and Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
eNeuro 28 November 2023, 10 (12) ENEURO.0308-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0308-23.2023
Matthew A. T. Elliott
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
3Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hunter E. Schweiger
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
4Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ash Robbins
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samira Vera-Choqqueccota
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
3Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Drew Ehrlich
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
6Department of Computational Media, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sebastian Hernandez
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kateryna Voitiuk
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
3Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinghui Geng
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jess L. Sevetson
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
4Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cordero Core
7Scientific Software Engineering Center, eScience Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yohei M. Rosen
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mircea Teodorescu
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
3Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
5Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nico O. Wagner
8College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Haussler
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
3Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
1Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
2Live Cell Biotechnology Discovery Lab, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95060
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Internet-enabled microscopy enables longitudinal organoid tracking. A, Experimental setup showing a Streamscope inside a tissue culture incubator tracking six organoids. B, Example of an organoid exposed to the proapoptotic drug Staurosporine. C, Example results obtained from a group of students calculating the maximal organoid area over 72 hours. For this experiment, each group of students measured three individual organoids, one of each condition.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Students who perform remote cortical organoid culture report positive feelings and strong interest in stem cell topics. A–K, Responses of the Techniques in Tissue Culture students to the postexperiment survey. n = 10 students. All of the 11 survey questions were statistically significant, using a one-sample two-tailed t test (p-value less or equal to 0.05). y-axis represents percent of students.

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Students’ previous experience and reported interest in topics related to mathematics, neuroscience and stem cell biology. A–P, Students’ answers to a survey assessing their level of experience and interest in the topics covered in the Mathematics of the Mind course. n = 18 students. A total of 14 of the 16 survey questions were statistically significant, using a one-sample two-tailed t test (p-value less or equal to 0.05). C and P were not significant. y-axis represents percent of students.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Mathematics self-concept of the students. A–F, Students’ answers to a survey assessing their mathematics self-concept. n = 18 students. Four of the six survey questions were statistically significant, using a one-sample two-tailed t test (p-value less or equal to 0.05). C and D were not significant. y-axis represents percent of students.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Student experiments explore programming neuronal circuits. A, Students were assigned two cerebral organoids (a test and control) to use in an experiment they designed. The organoids were placed on an HD MEA, which was used to send their electrophysiology stimulus pattern. B, The students used online software to explore the data. The software shows the location of neurons across the two organoids it is interacting with, as well as stimulation sites. Students can select a neuron to view specific information from it, such as the spike raster. C, The experiment shown involved a team of students who decided to code the rhythm of Steve Reich’s duet, Clapping Music. Each performers’ pattern was sent to different neurons. Image is from Reich’s music score. D, The students use the online software to verify that the stimulation pattern sent to the neurons follows the rhythm of the music. Red and blue represent the stimulation patterns sent to two different neuronal sites. E, The students were given the neuronal spike raster data from before, during and after the experiment. These graphs display the time points at which different neurons fire action potentials. Students can determine whether the stimulus pattern they created evoked the predicted neuronal response by comparing the firing patterns between neurons. F, Example of the types of computational analysis students performed. To see whether the stimulation had an effect on the neurons, this team performed a statistical test on the cosine similarity score, a metric of correlation. The test compared spontaneous activity directly after stimulation to that of 10 min after. They noticed that there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of the cosine similarities between the two timepoints. MCMC fit = Markov-Chain Monte Carlo fit.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    Example of Mathematics of the Mind student-project applying tetanic pattern to cortical organoids. A, Spike time tilling matrix for the electrophysiology data recorded from cortical organoids. B, Eigendecomposition on the spike time tilling matrix to extract its eigenvalues and eigenvectors. For illustration, the first four eigenvectors are plotted. C, Comparison of eigendecomposition on the spike time tiling matrix to other popular correlation techniques. Specifically, they considered how the method’s reconstruction error compared with that of performing principal components analysis on the correlation matrix. D, Superimposition of the first eigenvector’s values (represented as small circles in the blue-yellow range) on top of their corresponding neural unit allowed the students to differentiate which neurons came from which organoid.

  • Figure 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 7.

    Mathematics students report positive attitudes toward stem cells and neuroscience topics after performing experiments with cortical organoids. A–P, Postexperiment survey results for the Mathematics of the Mind course. n = 24 students. All of the 11 survey questions were statistically significant, using a one-sample two-tailed t test (p-value less or equal to 0.05). y-axis represents percent of students.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Comparison of postcourse surveys between Techniques in Tissue Culture and Mathematics of the Mind courses

    Questionp-valueSignificance
    I enjoyed learning about organoids0.56No
    I enjoyed performing these experiments0.36No
    Performing a remote [microscopy/electrophysiology] experiment was interesting0.53No
    Performing remote experiments allowed me to multitask more than in person labs0.90No
    The experiment selected helped solidify concepts discussed in class0.68No
    Performing remote [microscopy/electrophysiology] allowed me to use novel experimental models0.85No
    Performing this experiment made me want to learn more about stem cells0.96No
    Performing this experiment made me want to learn more about organoids0.85No
Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (12)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 12
December 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based Stem Cell and Neuroscience Education
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based Stem Cell and Neuroscience Education
Matthew A. T. Elliott, Hunter E. Schweiger, Ash Robbins, Samira Vera-Choqqueccota, Drew Ehrlich, Sebastian Hernandez, Kateryna Voitiuk, Jinghui Geng, Jess L. Sevetson, Cordero Core, Yohei M. Rosen, Mircea Teodorescu, Nico O. Wagner, David Haussler, Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
eNeuro 28 November 2023, 10 (12) ENEURO.0308-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0308-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Internet-Connected Cortical Organoids for Project-Based Stem Cell and Neuroscience Education
Matthew A. T. Elliott, Hunter E. Schweiger, Ash Robbins, Samira Vera-Choqqueccota, Drew Ehrlich, Sebastian Hernandez, Kateryna Voitiuk, Jinghui Geng, Jess L. Sevetson, Cordero Core, Yohei M. Rosen, Mircea Teodorescu, Nico O. Wagner, David Haussler, Mohammed A. Mostajo-Radji
eNeuro 28 November 2023, 10 (12) ENEURO.0308-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0308-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • brain organoids
  • internet-of-things
  • neuroscience
  • organoids
  • stem cells
  • STEM education

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: New Research

  • Release of extracellular matrix components after human traumatic brain injury
  • Action intentions reactivate representations of task-relevant cognitive cues
  • Interference underlies attenuation upon relearning in sensorimotor adaptation
Show more Research Article: New Research

History, Teaching, and Public Awareness

  • Incorporating Quantitative Literacy into a T32 Retreat: Lessons and Considerations from Experience
  • Illuminating the Shadows of Neuroscience: How Curiosity and Courage Redefine Research Models and Mentorship
  • My 50 Year Odyssey to Develop Behavioral Methods to Let Me See Quickly How Well Kittens See
Show more History, Teaching, and Public Awareness

Subjects

  • History, Teaching, and Public Awareness
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.