Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
eNeuro
eNeuro

Advanced Search

 

  • HOME
  • CONTENT
    • Early Release
    • Featured
    • Current Issue
    • Issue Archive
    • Blog
    • Collections
    • Podcast
  • TOPICS
    • Cognition and Behavior
    • Development
    • Disorders of the Nervous System
    • History, Teaching and Public Awareness
    • Integrative Systems
    • Neuronal Excitability
    • Novel Tools and Methods
    • Sensory and Motor Systems
  • ALERTS
  • FOR AUTHORS
  • ABOUT
    • Overview
    • Editorial Board
    • For the Media
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    • Feedback
  • SUBMIT
PreviousNext
Research ArticleResearch Article: Negative Results, Disorders of the Nervous System

Axonal Transport of Lysosomes Is Unaffected in Glucocerebrosidase-Inhibited iPSC-Derived Forebrain Neurons

A. J. Keefe, D. R. Gabrych, Y. Zhu, D. J. Vocadlo and M. A. Silverman
eNeuro 10 October 2023, 10 (10) ENEURO.0079-23.2023; https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0079-23.2023
A. J. Keefe
1Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. R. Gabrych
1Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Zhu
3Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. J. Vocadlo
2Centre for Cell Biology, Development, and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
3Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
4Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. A. Silverman
1Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
2Centre for Cell Biology, Development, and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. A. Silverman
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Movies
  • Extended Data
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Differentiating and characterizing iPSC-derived neurons. A, Timeline of iPSC culture and differentiation from day 0 (D0) to NPCs by D20, and subsequent differentiation to forebrain NPCs (D25) and forebrain neurons (D55). B, iPSCs express the pluripotency marker OCT4 (green). C, D, NPCs express the neural lineage markers NESTIN (green), PAX6 (red), and SOX2 (red). E, Differentiated neuron cultures stained for tubulin (green). F, Terminally differentiated neurons express the presynaptic protein synapsin (green) and dendritic protein MAP2 (red). G, Terminally differentiated neurons express the axonal protein Tau (blue) and the presynaptic protein SV2 (green).

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Validation of GCase inhibition with CBE. A, B, Relative to controls, 10-d CBE-treated neurons incubated with the GCase substrate GBA1-FQ6 show negligible fluorescence activity. C, Relative fluorescence units (RFU) per cell. N = 3 independent experiments run in duplicate; Control, n = 19 fields of view; CBE, n = 21 fields of view. CBE treatment (100 μm) significantly reduces GCase activity relative to controls (*p < 0.0001; Extended Data Table 1-1). D, Ten days of 100 μm CBE treatment significantly upregulates the staining intensity of astrocytic marker GFAP compared with controls. E, Average GFAP staining intensity per field of view. N = 3 independent experiments run in duplicate; Control, n = 112 fields of view; CBE, n = 120 fields of view. Average GFAP staining intensity per field of view is significantly increased in CBE-treated cultures (*p < 0.0001; Extended Data Table 1-1).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    CBE does not affect axonal transport of LAMP1-GFP vesicles. 54 DIV neurons were transfected with the lysosome marker LAMP1-GFP and imaged 24 h later. A, Still frames of a representative axon from a control video sampled at various time points (Movie 1) and (B, C) representative kymographs from one control and one CBE-treated LAMP1-GFP video. Red arrows denote retrograde; blue arrows denote anterograde. Videos were acquired at 1.5 frames/s for 120 s. D, E, Analysis of kymographs revealed no significant effect of CBE treatment on transport parameters (N = 4 independent experiments run in duplicate; Control, n = 116 cells, 2080 transport events; CBE, n = 109 cells, 2179 transport events, n.s. = nonsignificant, p > 0.05). F, Table of all measured transport parameters (±SD) and Extended Data Table 1-1.

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    CBE does not affect axonal transport of acidic vesicles. 55 DIV neurons were stained with LysoBrite and imaged live. A, Still frames of one representative axon from a control condition transport video sample at various time points and (B, C) representative kymographs from one control and one CBE-treated LysoBrite transport video. Red arrows denote retrograde; blue arrows denote anterograde. Videos were acquired at one frame per second for 90 s. D, E, Analysis of kymographs revealed no significant effect of CBE treatment on any transport parameter (N = 3 independent experiments run in triplicate; Control, n = 116 cells, 752 transport events; CBE, n = 140 cells, 1180 transport events, n.s. = nonsignificant, p > 0.05). F, Table of all measured transport parameters (±SD) and Extended Data Table 1-1.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    CBE does not affect axonal transport of mitochondria. 54 DIV neurons were transfected with mitochondrial marker MTS-dsRed2 and imaged 24 h later. A and Movie 2, Still frames of a representative axon from a control condition video at various time points and (B, C) representative kymographs from one control and one CBE-treated MTS-dsRed2 video. Red arrows denote retrograde; blue arrows denote anterograde. Videos were acquired at 0.5 frames/s for 180 s. D, E, Analysis of kymographs revealed no significant effect of CBE treatment on any transport parameter (N = 3 independent experiments run in triplicate; Control, n = 40, 437 transport events; CBE, n = 35, 470 transport events, n.s. = nonsignificant, p > 0.05). F, Table of all measured transport parameters (±SD) and Extended Data Table 1-1.

  • Figure 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 6.

    CBE does not influence lysosomal rupturing following LLoME treatment. CBE-treated NPCs and controls assessed for lysosomal rupture events by staining for LAMP1 (top, red) and p62 (middle, green), and colocalized (bottom). A, B, In the absence of LLoME, neither CBE nor control NPCs develop p62-positive lysosomes. C, D, Following treatment of 600 μm LLoME for 1 h, p62 puncta form in both CBE and control conditions. E, p62-positive puncta colocalizing with LAMP1 puncta were analyzed using the ImageJ plugin ComDet, revealing no significant difference in puncta relative fluorescence units (RFU) per cell. F, The percent of LAMP1 positive puncta that colocalized with p62 puncta, indicating lysosomal rupture, per cell were analyzed using ComDet. There was no significant difference in the percent ruptured lysosomes per cell between controls and CBE-treated NPCs (N = 3 independent experiments run in duplicate; Control +LLoME, n = 257 cells; Control −LLoME, n = 91 cells; CBE +LLoME, n = 201 cells; CBE −LLoME, n = 91 cells; Extended Data Table 1-1).

Movies

  • Figures
  • Extended Data
  • Movie 1.

    Live imaging of axons showing LAMP1-eGFP transport in control versus CBE-treated cells. 1.25 frames/s, 20-s recording, playback: 1× real time.

  • Movie 2.

    Live imaging of axons showing MTS-dsRed2 transport in control versus CBE-treated cells. 0.5 frames/s, 90-s recording; playback: 4× real time.

Extended Data

  • Figures
  • Movies
  • Extended Data Figure 1-1

    CBE does not influence LC3 staining following LLoME treatment. CBE-treated NPCs and controls assessed for lysosomal rupture events by staining for LAMP1 (top, red) and LC3 (middle, green), and colocalized (bottom). A, B, In the absence of LLoME, neither CBE nor control NPCs develop LC3-positive lysosomes. C, D, Following treatment of 600 μm LLoME for 1 h, LC3 puncta form in both CBE and control conditions. E, LC3-positive puncta colocalizing with LAMP1 puncta were analyzed using the ImageJ plugin ComDet, revealing no significant difference in puncta relative fluorescence units (RFU) per cell. F, The percent of LAMP1 positive puncta that colocalized with LC3 puncta, indicating lysosomal rupture, per cell were analyzed using ComDet. There was no significant difference in the percent ruptured lysosomes per cell between controls and CBE-treated NPCs (N = 3 independent experiments run in duplicate; Control +LLoME, n = 90 cells; Control −LLoME, n = 32 cells; CBE +LLoME, n = 68 cells; CBE −LLoME, n = 36 cells; Extended Data Table 1-1). Download Figure 1-1, TIF file.

  • Extended Data Table 1-1

    Student t test p values for all data. Download Table 1-1, DOC file.

Back to top

In this issue

eneuro: 10 (10)
eNeuro
Vol. 10, Issue 10
October 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Masthead (PDF)
Email

Thank you for sharing this eNeuro article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Axonal Transport of Lysosomes Is Unaffected in Glucocerebrosidase-Inhibited iPSC-Derived Forebrain Neurons
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from eNeuro
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in eNeuro.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Print
View Full Page PDF
Citation Tools
Axonal Transport of Lysosomes Is Unaffected in Glucocerebrosidase-Inhibited iPSC-Derived Forebrain Neurons
A. J. Keefe, D. R. Gabrych, Y. Zhu, D. J. Vocadlo, M. A. Silverman
eNeuro 10 October 2023, 10 (10) ENEURO.0079-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0079-23.2023

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Respond to this article
Share
Axonal Transport of Lysosomes Is Unaffected in Glucocerebrosidase-Inhibited iPSC-Derived Forebrain Neurons
A. J. Keefe, D. R. Gabrych, Y. Zhu, D. J. Vocadlo, M. A. Silverman
eNeuro 10 October 2023, 10 (10) ENEURO.0079-23.2023; DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0079-23.2023
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Significance Statement
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
    • Synthesis
    • Author Response
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • axonal transport
  • conduritol B epoxide
  • glucocerebrosidase
  • lysosomes

Responses to this article

Respond to this article

Jump to comment:

No eLetters have been published for this article.

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

Research Article: Negative Results

  • Expression of HDAC3-Y298H Point Mutant in Medial Habenula Cholinergic Neurons Has No Effect on Cocaine-Induced Behaviors
  • Alpha-Synuclein Phosphomimetic Y39E and S129D Knock-In Mice Show Cytosolic Alpha-Synuclein Localization without Developing Neurodegeneration or Motor Deficits
  • Paired Stimulation of Different Digits for 30 min Does Not Produce Long-Term Plastic Changes in the Human Cutaneomuscular Reflex
Show more Research Article: Negative Results

Disorders of the Nervous System

  • Altered PI3K/mTOR signaling within the forebrain leads to respiratory deficits in a mouse model of epilepsy
  • Lack of ADAP1/Centaurin-α1 Ameliorates Cognitive Impairment and Neuropathological Hallmarks in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
  • The PDGFBB-PDGFRβ Pathway and Laminins in Pericytes Are Involved in the Temporal Change of AQP4 Polarity during Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Pathogenesis
Show more Disorders of the Nervous System

Subjects

  • Disorders of the Nervous System
  • Home
  • Alerts
  • Follow SFN on BlueSky
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Facebook
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on Twitter
  • Follow Society for Neuroscience on LinkedIn
  • Visit Society for Neuroscience on Youtube
  • Follow our RSS feeds

Content

  • Early Release
  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Issue Archive
  • Blog
  • Browse by Topic

Information

  • For Authors
  • For the Media

About

  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Privacy Notice
  • Contact
  • Feedback
(eNeuro logo)
(SfN logo)

Copyright © 2025 by the Society for Neuroscience.
eNeuro eISSN: 2373-2822

The ideas and opinions expressed in eNeuro do not necessarily reflect those of SfN or the eNeuro Editorial Board. Publication of an advertisement or other product mention in eNeuro should not be construed as an endorsement of the manufacturer’s claims. SfN does not assume any responsibility for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from or related to any use of any material contained in eNeuro.