Abstract
Despite the widespread use of up—down staircases in adaptive threshold estimation, their efficiency and usability in forced-choice experiments has been recently debated. In this study, simulation techniques were used to determine the small-sample convergence properties of stochastic approximation (SA) staircases as a function of several experimental parameters. We found that satisfying some general requirements (use of the accelerated SA algorithm, clear suprathreshold initial stimulus intensity, large initial step size) the convergence was accurate independently of the spread of the underlying psychometric function. SA staircases were also reliable for targeting percent-correct levels far from the midpoint of the psychometric function and performed better than classical up—down staircases with fixed step size. These results prompt the utilization of SA staircases in practical forced-choice estimation of sensory thresholds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amitay, S., Hawkey, D. J. C., &Moore, D. R. (2005). Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 691–698.
Anderson, A. J., &Johnson, C. A. (2006). Comparison of the ASA, MOBS, and ZEST threshold methods.Vision Research,46, 2403–2411.
Brown, L. G. (1996). Additional rules for the transformed up—down method in psychophysics.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 959–962.
Fechner, G. T. (1860).Elemente der Psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.
García-Pérez, M. A. (1998). Forced-choice staircases with fixed step size: Asymptotic and small-sample properties.Vision Research,38, 1861–1881.
García-Pérez, M. A. (2002). Properties of some variants of adaptive staircases with fixed step sizes.Spatial Vision,15, 303–321.
Green, D. M. (1990). Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,87, 2662–2674.
Hall, J. L. (1981). Hybrid adaptive procedure for estimation of psychometric functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 1763–1769.
Kaernbach, C. (1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up— down method.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 227–229.
Kaernbach, C. (2001a). Adaptive threshold estimation with unforcedchoice tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1377–1388.
Kaernbach, C. (2001b). Slope bias of psychometric functions derived from adaptive data.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1389–1398.
Kershaw, C. D. (1985). Statistical properties of staircase estimates from two interval forced choice experiments.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,38, 35–43.
Kesten, H. (1958). Accelerated stochastic approximation.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,29, 41–59.
King-Smith, P. E., Grigsby, S. S., Vingrys, A. J., Benes, S. C., &Supowit, A. (1994). Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: Theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.Vision Research,34, 885–912.
Klein, S. A. (2001). Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1421–1455.
Kontsevich, L. L., &Tyler, C. W. (1999). Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold.Vision Research,39, 2729–2737.
Leek, M. R. (2001). Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1279–1292.
Levitt, H. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 467–477.
Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robbins, H., &Monro, S. (1951). A stochastic approximation method.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,29, 400–407.
Takeuchi, T. (2005). The effect of eccentricity and the adapting level on the café wall illusion.Perception & Psychophysics,67, 1113–1127.
Taylor, M. M., &Creelman, C. D. (1967). PEST: Efficient estimates on probability functions.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,41, 782–787.
Treutwein, B. (1995). Adaptive psychophysical procedures.Vision Research,35, 2503–2522.
Watson, A. B., &Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 113–120.
Wetherill, G. B., &Levitt, H. (1965). Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function.British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology,18, 1–10.
Zwislocki, J. J., &Relkin, E. M. (2001). On a psychophysical transformed-rule up and down method converging on a 75% level of correct responses.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,98, 4811–4814.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faes, L., Nollo, G., Ravelli, F. et al. Small-sample characterization of stochastic approximation staircases in forced-choice adaptive threshold estimation. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 254–262 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193747
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193747