Skip to main content
Download PDF

Liposomal clodronate selectively eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures

Journal of Neuroinflammation volume 9, Article number: 116 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There is increasing interest in astrocyte biology because astrocytes have been demonstrated to play prominent roles in physiological and pathological conditions of the central nervous system, including neuroinflammation. To understand astrocyte biology, primary astrocyte cultures are most commonly used because of the direct accessibility of astrocytes in this system. However, this advantage can be hindered by microglial contamination. Although several authors have warned regarding microglial contamination in this system, complete microglial elimination has never been achieved.

Methods

The number and proliferative potential of contaminating microglia in primary astrocyte cultures were quantitatively assessed by immunocytologic and flow cytometric analyses. To examine the utility of clodronate for microglial elimination, primary astrocyte cultures or MG-5 cells were exposed to liposomal or free clodronate, and then immunocytologic, flow cytometric, and gene expression analyses were performed. The gene expression profiles of microglia-eliminated and microglia-contaminated cultures were compared after interleukin-6 (IL-6) stimulation.

Results

The percentage of contaminating microglia exceeded 15% and continued to increase because of their high proliferative activity in conventional primary astrocyte cultures. These contaminating microglia were selectively eliminated low concentration of liposomal clodronate. Although primary microglia and MG-5 cells were killed by both liposomal and free clodronate, free clodronate significantly affected the viability of astrocytes. In contrast, liposomal clodronate selectively eliminated microglia without affecting the viability, proliferation or activation of astrocytes. The efficacy of liposomal clodronate was much higher than that of previously reported methods used for decreasing microglial contamination. Furthermore, we observed rapid tumor necrosis factor-α and IL-1b gene induction in conventional primary astrocyte cultures after IL-6 stimulation, which was due to the activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of the transcription pathway in contaminating microglia.

Conclusions

Because contaminating microglia could result in erroneous data regarding the pro-inflammatory properties of astrocytes, astrocyte biology should be studied in the absence of microglial contamination. Our simple method will be widely applicable to experimental studies of astrocyte biology and provide clues for understanding the role of astrocytes in neural development, function and disease.

Background

Astrocytes comprise the majority of cells in the central nervous system (CNS). Although astrocytes were originally defined as gap fillers for neuronal networks, they have been found to play prominent roles in normal CNS functions, such as energy metabolism, neurotransmission, maintenance of blood–brain barrier, extracellular ion homeostasis and cerebrovascular regulation [1, 2]. In pathological conditions, they also participate in neuroinflammation and tissue repair [2–5]. Much of this knowledge was obtained through experimental studies with rodent primary astrocyte cultures. Because primary astrocyte cultures are convenient and easy to establish, they are most commonly used for assessing astrocyte biology [6]. In brief, these cultures are prepared by dissociation of cells of the dissected brain or spinal cord and plating of the dissociated cells on dishes. With regard to the detailed protocol for this method, several minor modifications have been incorporated since the original method was described [7–10]. However, these modifications result in cultures in which astrocytes are the predominant cells, but never comprise 100% of the cells in these preparations (approximately 90% to 95%) [6].

Microglia, the resident tissue macrophages of CNS, are frequent contaminants of primary astrocyte cultures [6]. Microglial contamination has been often underestimated because relatively small numbers of microglia were observed in these cultures [6]. However, recent studies suggested that the presence of microglia in primary astrocyte cultures largely affects astrocyte responses in vitro[11–13]. This will be especially problematic when sensitive biochemical methods are employed, such as high-through-put next-generation sequencing technology [14]. In the CNS, microglia provides first line of host defense despite that they comprise a relatively small proportion of CNS cells. Microglia respond rapidly to pathological alterations [15, 16] and regulate responses of other cells, including astrocytes [17–19]. Similarly, astrocytes mediate responses, proliferation and activation of microglia by releasing various cytokines or ATP [15, 20]. Because these complex cell–cell interactions confound the understanding of astrocyte function [6], astrocytes need to be investigated in microglia-free conditions to accurately assess their biology.

Clodronate belongs to a family of bisphosphonates and is widely used to treat osteolytic diseases and osteoporosis because of its inhibitory effect on osteoclasts [21]. This drug is known to induce apoptosis in macrophages or macrophage-like cells [22] and is used to eliminate these cells in vivo[23]. Because freely dissolved clodronate (free clodronate) is a highly hydrophilic molecule that hardly crosses cellular phospholipid membranes [21], liposome-mediated intracellular delivery of clodronate has been developed for macrophage elimination [24]. Liposomes are artificially prepared lipid vesicles consisting of concentric phospholipid bilayers entrapping aqueous compartments that are used to encapsulate hydrophilic molecules to dissolve them in aqueous solutions [25]. Liposome-encapsulated clodronate (liposomal clodronate) is specifically phagocytized by macrophages. After phagocytosis, lysosomal action disrupts the fatty bilayers of the liposome, and free clodronate is then released into the cell, causing irreversible functional damage and apoptosis [26]. Selective elimination of macrophages by liposomal clodronate was reported in vitro[22, 27].

Since recent study demonstrated microglial death by liposomal clodronate in the brain [28], we hypothesized that liposomal clodronate can eliminate microglia in primary astrocyte cultures. In this study, we demonstrated selective microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures using liposomal clodronate without affecting the viability, proliferation or activation of astrocytes. Furthermore, by comparing the gene expression profiles of microglia-eliminated and microglia-contaminated primary astrocyte cultures after interleukin-6 (IL-6) stimulation, we found that contaminating microglia induced deceptive up-regulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-1β genes in conventional primary astrocyte cultures through the activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of the transcription (JAK/STAT) pathway, thus highlighting the importance of microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures. Using microglia-eliminated cultures, functional aspects of astrocytes can be accurately studied without complex interactions in response to specific molecules. Our simple and useful method will be widely applicable to experimental studies of astrocyte biology.

Material and methods

Preparation of primary astrocyte cultures

Conventional primary astrocyte cultures were prepared from C57BL/6 mice as described previously [6, 29, 30]. In brief, after removal of the meninges, postnatal day 3 (P3) mouse brain tissues were minced and incubated in a rocking water bath at 37 °C for 30 minutes in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in the presence of 300 g/mL DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.25% trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich). Enzyme-digested dissociated cells were triturated with 0.25% fetal bovine serum (FBS), washed and centrifuged at 300 × g for five minutes. The pellet was resuspended in DMEM, passed through a 30-μm nylon mesh, washed, and centrifuged at 300 × g for five minutes. Following dilution with astrocyte-specific medium (DMEM containing 10% FBS, 0.2 mM l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin), the cells were plated on poly-l-lysine–coated culture dishes at the density of 1.0 × 105 cells/cm2 and allowed to adhere for one day in a humidified CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Next, non-adherent cells were removed, and fresh astrocyte-specific medium was added. Adherent cells were maintained in astrocyte-specific medium for seven days with a medium change every two to three days [6]. For passage, monolayers were rinsed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then dislodged by trypsinization (0.25% trypsin and 0.02% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) for three minutes at 37 °C and plated on poly-l-lysine-coated dishes at the density of 5.0 × 104 cells/cm2. Passaged astrocyte cultures between three and five weeks in vitro were used throughout, unless otherwise specified. All experimental manipulations were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiment in the Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, and conducted under the control of the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation.

Conventional shake-off method

Primary astrocyte cultures were thoroughly agitated in an orbital incubator shaker at 350 rpm and 37 °C for 12 h on Day 7 after their establishment. Immediately after agitation, all cells suspended in the culture medium were discarded, and attached cells were sub-cultured in astrocyte-specific medium [6].

Preparation of liposomal clodronate

Liposomal clodronate was prepared as previously described [25, 31]. In brief, 4.30 mL phosphatidylcholine solution was added to 4.00 mL cholesterol solution in a 0.5 liter round bottom flask. The ethanol was removed by low vacuum (58 mbar) rotary (150 rpm) evaporation at 40 °C. The condensed ethanol was removed by aerating the flask three times. The phospholipid film was dispersed in 20 mL clodronate solution (for liposomal clodronate) or 20 ml PBS (for empty liposomes) by gentle rotation at room temperature. The suspension was kept at room temperature for about two hours and then the solution was gently shaken. The suspension was put in a 50 ml plastic tube and sonicated in a water bath (55 kHz) for three minutes. The suspension was kept at room temperature for two hours. Before using the liposomal clodronate, the non-encapsulated clodronate was removed by centrifuging the liposomes at 24,000 × g and 10 °C for 60 minutes. The clodronate liposomes will form a white band at the top of the suspension, whereas the suspension itself will be nearly clear. Carefully remove the clodronate solution under the white band of liposomes with a 10 ml pipet. The liposomes was resuspended in approximately 45 ml PBS and washed four to five times. The final liposome pellet was resuspended in PBS and adjusted to a final volume of 20.0 mL. The suspension was gently shaken before dispensing to achieve a homogeneous distribution of the liposomes in suspension. Clodronate in PBS was used as the control for liposomal clodronate, and clodronate disodium salt (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used as free clodronate.

Microglial cell line culture

The MG-5 murine microglial cell line (kindly provided by Dr Kohsaka S., Department of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neuroscience) was cultured as described previously [32, 33]. Conditioned medium from the supernatant of murine astrocyte cell line A1 cells (kindly provided by Dr Kohsaka S.) cultured overnight in DMEM containing 10% FBS and penicillin-streptomycin (20 U/mL) was used as the culture medium for MG-5 cells. The BV-2 murine microglial cell line (kindly provided by Dr. Biber K., Department of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen) was cultured in DMEM with 5% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin–streptomycin, as described previously [34, 35].

Immunocytologic analysis

Cultures were fixed for 15 minutes in cold 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS at room temperature and post-fixed in methanol at −20 °C for 15 minutes. After being washed three times with PBS, fixed samples were permeabilized in 0.01% Triton-X in PBS for 30 minutes and blocked with 5% normal goat serum for 1 h at 4 °C. Primary antibodies in the blocking solution were applied overnight at 4 °C. Astrocytes were identified using the rabbit anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody (anti-GFAP; 1:1,000; Dako Cytomation, Glostrup, Denmark, rat, mouse,), rat anti-GFAP (1:1,000; Invitrogen), or mouse anti-GFAP(1:1,000; Sigma-Aldrich). Microglia were identified using rabbit anti-ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1 (Iba1; 1:200; Wako, Osaka, Japan) or rat anti-CD68 (1:200, Serotec, Oxford, UK). Rabbit anti-phosphorylated-STAT3 (Tyr705) (anti-pSTAT3; 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) were used to identify the activation of JAK/STAT pathway. After rinsing, samples were incubated with Alexa Fluor secondary antibody conjugates for mouse, rabbit, or rat IgG (1:200, Invitrogen) in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclear counterstaining was performed using Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen). Proliferating cells were identified using rabbit anti-Ki67 (1:1,000, Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) or rabbit anti-phosphorylated histone H3 (Ser10) (p-His-H3; 1:1,000, Upstate/Millipore, MA, USA). For propidium iodide (PI) staining, 0.1 mg/ml PI was added to the culture medium for 2 h, and the cells were fixed in 4% PFA. Fluorescent- labeled samples were coverslipped with fluorescent mounting medium (Dako Cytomation). Images were captured using the BZ-9000 digital microscope system (Keyence, Osaka, Japan) or an epifluorescent microscope (BX51; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a digital camera.

BrdU incorporation assay

The proliferation of microglia was examined by adding 50 μg⁄mL 5-bromo-20-deoxyuridine (BrdU) to the culture medium and incubating for 24 h. Following fixation, samples were pre-treated with 2 N HCL at 37 °C for five minutes. Rat anti-BrdU (1: 200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-GFAP, and rabbit anti-Iba1 were used to identify proliferating astrocytes and microglia. Bound antibodies were visualized using anti-rabbit, anti-mouse, and anti-rat IgG secondary antibodies with Alexa Fluor fluorescent conjugates.

Quantitative analysis

To quantify the number of BrdU-positive cells, anti-BrdU–immunoreactive cells were counted using the BZ-9000 digital microscope and BZII-Analyzer measurement software (Keyence, Los Angeles, CA, USA). Algorithms for counting the number of BrdU-positive cells were provided by Dynamic cell count BZ-H1C software (Keyence); these algorithms selectively count immunopositive particles that range in size from 5 to 15 μm in both dimensions (X and Y) and automatically eliminate spurious particles [19].

Flow cytometric analysis

Flow cytometric analysis was performed as previously described [36]. In brief, confluent cultures were trypsinized and resuspended in 10 mL of fresh astrocyte-specific medium on the dish. After centrifugation at 300 × g and 4 °C for two minutes, the cell pellet was resuspended in 10 mL medium. The resulting suspension was pelleted by centrifugation at 300 × g and 4 °C for 2 minutes and then incubated on ice with fluorescent antibodies for 30 minutes. Samples were stained phycoerythrin -Cy7–conjugated CD45 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated CD11b (eBioscience), PE-conjugated Gr-1 (eBioscience), and biotin-conjugated major histocompatibility complex class II (eBioscience). Allophycocyanin-conjugated streptavidin (eBioscience) was added to label biotin-conjugated antibodies. All samples were suspended in 500 μL fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (Hanks balanced salt solution, 2.5% FBS, 0.1% NaN3) and analyzed at the same flow rate and duration to allow comparisons among all samples using a FACSAria II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences).

Quantitative and semi-quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was isolated from primary astrocyte cultures using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or from FACS-purified cells using the RNeasy Micro kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. For cDNA synthesis, RT was performed using the PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using primers specific for the genes of interest [see Additional file 1] and SYBR Premix Dimer Eraser (TaKaRa Bio) in 20-μL reactions. Data were normalized to glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression (GAPDH). RT-PCR was performed on a Thermocycler (Biometra, Gottingen, Germany) and products were detected by electrophoresis and SYBR Green I (Sigma-Aldrich).

Cell stimulation

Cells were stimulated with 50 ng/mL IL-6 (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) and 200 ng/mL soluble IL-6 receptor (R&D Systems Inc.).

Statistical analysis

Statistical evaluations were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test. For multiple comparisons between groups, the Kruskal–Wallis H test with Bonferroni’s post hoc correction was used. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data in graphs are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM).

Results

Contaminating microglia increase in number over time in primary astrocyte cultures

We first examined change in the number of contaminating microglia in primary astrocyte cultures over time because their proliferative activities remain elusive in this culture condition [6]. Dissociated cells from P3 mouse brains were cultured in astrocyte-specific medium at relatively low densities (5.0 × 104 cells/cm2) [6]. Astrocytes growing in primary monolayer cultures contained a substantial number of contaminating microglia seven days after preparation, as evidenced by the high levels of Iba1 and CD68 (Figure 1A). Even after utilizing the conventional shake-off method, many microglia were observed in primary astrocyte cultures and these remaining amoeboid microglia had multiple short spinous processes (Figure 1B), suggesting strong adhesion of these cells to culture dishes. When these primary astrocyte cultures were subcultured and maintained for 14 days without passage, the number of microglia gradually increased with time, especially from 7 days after passage (Figure 1C, D), indicating the high proliferative potential of microglia in this culture. To assess their proliferation in primary astrocyte cultures, we performed the BrdU incorporation assay and Ki67 immunostaining. The BrdU incorporation assay, which labeled S-phase cells, demonstrated the presence of abundant proliferating cells in primary astrocyte cultures (Figure 1E-H). Whereas there were large number of proliferating astrocytes four days after seeding (Figure 1E), a certain number proliferating microglia were observed in primary astrocyte cultures (Figure 1G). Quantitative analysis showed that the proliferation of astrocytes was most prominent immediately after seeding and thereafter gradually decreased (Figure 1E, F). In contrast, the proliferation of microglia gradually increased over 14 days (Figure 1G, H). Quantitative analysis of cells positive for Ki67, a nuclear protein expressed in all phases of the cell cycle, confirmed the extensive proliferative potency of microglia (Figure 1I-K). Of note, the number of Ki67-positive microglia was higher than that of Ki67-positive astrocytes from seven days after seeding. We further examined the temporal changes in the number of microglia in astrocyte cultures for eight weeks with weekly passages. The proliferative potential of microglia was maintained after eight weeks of culture (Figure 1L), and the number of contaminating microglia was significantly higher at eight weeks after preparation than at one week after preparation (Figure 1M, N). These results indicate that the initially small number of contaminating microglia could dramatically increase with time in primary astrocyte cultures, thus highlighting the need for complete microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures.

Figure 1
figure 1

Quantitative analysis of microglial contamination in primary astrocyte cultures. (A) Triple immunostaining for primary astrocyte cultures using Iba1 (red), CD68 (green), and GFAP (blue) antibodies. Scale bar, 100 μm. (B) High magnification of the remaining Iba1-positive microglia after the shake-off method. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Triple immunostaining 4 and 14 days after the establishment of astrocyte primary cultures. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Quantification of the number of contaminating microglia in passaged culture. (E) Triple immunostaining of passaged culture using GFAP (green), BrdU (red), and Hoechst (blue) antibodies at 1, 4, and 14 days after seeding. Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) Changes in the number of BrdU-positive proliferating astrocytes to the total number of astrocytes over time in passaged culture. (G) Triple immunostaining of passaged culture using Iba1 (green) and BrdU (red) antibodies at 1, 4, and 14 days after seeding. Scale bar, 50 μm. (H) Changes in the number of BrdU-positive proliferating microglia to total microglia over time in passaged culture. (I-J) Triple immunostaining of passaged culture using GFAP (blue), CD68 (green), and Ki67 (red) antibodies at 1 and 10 days (I) and 14 days (J) after seeding. Scale bar, 50 or 200 μm. (K) The number of GFAP-positive astrocytes and CD11b-positive microglia in the Ki67-positive proliferating cell population. (L) Immunostaining of primary astrocyte cultures at 8 weeks after preparation showing Ki67-positive microglia. Scale bar, 200 μm. Inset shows high magnification image of Ki67-positive microglia. (M) Flow cytometric analysis at one and eight weeks after culture preparation showed increased number of CD11b-positive microglia. (N) Comparison of the number of the CD11b-positive population between one and eight weeks after preparation. *P <0.05, paired Student’s t-test. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Liposomal and free clodronate induce apoptosis of microglia

Although free clodronate does not easily enter into microglia because of difficulty in passage through cell membranes, it slowly accumulates in cells that remain in the surrounding medium [37]. In addition, recent studies have suggested that free clodronate could induce apoptosis of microglia [38–40]. Therefore, we examined two forms of clodronate, free and liposomal, for their ability to eliminate microglia using microglial cell line MG-5 [32]. These cells were exposed to different concentrations of free or liposomal clodronate, and PI staining was performed to evaluate MG-5 cell death. Many PI-positive cells (indicating dead/dying cells) were observed 24 h after clodronate exposure (Figure 2A), and both forms of clodronate significantly increased the number of PI-positive cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2B). Three days after exposure, both forms of clodronate significantly reduced the number of MG-5 cells (Figure 2C, D). Although partial reduction was already observed using 5 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate, a nearly 10-fold higher concentration of free clodronate was required to produce a similar effect (Figure 2D). Most MG-5 cells were eliminated by 200 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate and 2,000 μg/mL of free clodronate (Figure 2D). Analyses of repeated immunostaining of the same sample confirmed that the efficacy of low-concentration liposomal clodronate was similar to that of high-concentration free clodronate (Figure 2E). These results indicate that both free and liposomal clodronate can potentially eliminate microglia and that liposomal clodronate more potently eliminates microglia than free clodronate.

Figure 2
figure 2

Utility of liposomal and free clodronate for microglial elimination. (A) PI staining of MG-5 cells one day after exposure to each clodronate. PI-positive cells (red) indicate dead MG-5 cells. Scale bar, 500 μm. (B) Effects of liposomal and free clodronate on the viability of MG-5 cells. Both forms of clodronate increased the number of dead cells in a concentration-dependent manner after 24 h of exposure. (C) Double immunostaining of MG-5 cells three days after exposure to each clodronate using CD68 (green) and Iba1 (red) antibodies. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Effects of liposomal and free clodronate on the viability of MG-5 cells. The number of viable MG-5 cells significantly decreased after exposure to both forms of clodronate. (E) Repeated immunostaining using CD11b and PI antibodies showing the time course of death of MG-5 cells after exposure to both forms of clodronate. Scale bar, 200 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Liposomal clodronate selectively eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures

Similar to the results obtained in MG-5 cells, both forms of clodronate completely eliminated microglia from primary astrocyte cultures after three days of treatment (2,000 μg/mL of free clodronate and 200 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate; data not shown). Because MG-5 cells appear to be relatively resistant to apoptosis [32], primary microglia could be eliminated at concentrations lower than those required for MG-5 cells. Therefore, we attempted to determine the optimal concentration of both forms of clodronate for selective microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures. Although flow cytometric analysis showed that concentrations of free clodronate required to eliminate primary microglia were similar to those required to eliminate MG-5 cells (2,000 μg/mL, three-day exposure), liposomal clodronate eliminated microglia at concentrations lower than those required to eliminate MG-5 cells (100 μg/mL, three-day exposure) (Figure 3A, B). To assess whether free and liposomal clodronate selectively eliminate microglia, we examined the viability of microglia and astrocytes in primary astrocyte cultures after treatment with each clodronate. PI-positive microglia were observed 24 h after exposure to both forms of clodronate (Figure 3C), whereas PI-positive astrocytes were rarely observed after liposomal clodronate exposure. However, many PI-positive astrocytes were observed after exposure to free clodronate (Figure 3C), and this type of clodronate significantly decreased the number of astrocytes three days after exposure (Figure 3D). These results indicate that free clodronate but not liposomal clodronate significantly affects the viability of astrocytes; therefore, only liposomal clodronate was further examined for microglial elimination. Next, the duration of exposure to liposomal clodronate was assessed at the concentration achieving complete elimination of microglia (100 μg/mL) and 12 h of exposure to liposomal clodronate were sufficient for microglial elimination (Figure 3E). These results demonstrated that liposomal clodronate selectively eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures without affecting the viability of astrocytes.

Figure 3
figure 3

Liposomal clodronate effectively eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures. (A, B) Flow cytometric analysis of primary astrocyte cultures 3 days after exposure to free (A) or liposomal clodronate (B). The result indicated dramatic reduction in the CD11 positive (left) and CD45int/CD11bpositive/Gr-1nega-int (right) populations in a concentration-dependent manner. Complete microglial elimination was achieved using 2,000 μg/mL of free clodronate and 100 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate. (C) Triple immunostaining of primary astrocyte cultures 24 h after exposure to each clodronate using GFAP (blue), CD68 (green), and PI (red) antibodies. There were many PI and GFAP double-positive cells after exposure to free clodronate. Scale bar, 200 μm. (D) Quantification of the number of GFAP-positive cells three days after exposure to free or liposomal clodronate (n = 5). The number of astrocytes significantly decreased after exposure to free clodronate (*P <0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test). (E) The duration of exposure to liposomal clodronate required for complete microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that microglial elimination was achieved 12 h after exposure to 100 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Liposomal clodronate did not affect the activation or proliferation of astrocytes

We next determined whether liposomal clodronate-mediated microglial elimination (100 μg/mL, 12 h) affects the activation or proliferation of astrocytes. After 12 h of exposure to liposomal clodronate, the morphological features of astrocytes did not significantly change and GFAP up-regulation was not observed (Figure 4A,B). Nestin and vimentin, representative markers of astrocyte activation, were not up-regulated in any astrocytes by exposure to liposomal clodronate (Figure 4A, B). To confirm these results, CD11b-negative population after 12 h of exposure was purified using flow cytometer, and qPCR was performed on FACS-purified CD11b-negative population. The gene expression of Gfap and nestin was not up-regulated in this population after exposure to liposomal clodronate compared to that without liposome clodronate exposure (Figure 4C). The proliferation of cells was assessed by the BrdU incorporation assay and Ki67 immunostaining. As shown in Figure 4D–G, the number of Ki67- and BrdU-positive proliferating cells among GFAP-positive astrocytes after exposure to liposomal clodronate did not decrease compared to that without liposomal clodronate exposure, suggesting that 100 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate did not inhibit the proliferation of astrocytes. These results demonstrated that liposomal clodronate does not affect the activation or proliferation of astrocytes during microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures.

Figure 4
figure 4

Liposomal clodronate did not affect the proliferation or activation of astrocytes. (A, B) Immunostaining of primary astrocyte cultures 12 h after exposure to liposomal clodronate using GFAP (green) and nestin (red; A) or vimentin (red; B) antibodies. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) Gene expression levels of GFAP and nestin for astrocytes with/without liposome-clodronate exposure as determined by qPCR. Astrocytes isolated from each condition by flow-cytometry were used in these analyses. There were no significant difference in the gene expression of GFAP and nestin between the two (n = 5, Mann–Whitney U test). (D-F) Proliferation of astrocytes at six hours after the exposure was assessed by immunostaining using pHis-H3 (red; D) or Ki67 (red; F) antibodies Scar bar, 100 μm. Quantification of the proportion of p-His-H3-positive astrocytes (E) and Ki67-positive astrocytes (G) to total astrocytes after liposome-clodronate treatment (n = 5, paired Student’s t-test). Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Liposomal clodronate eliminates microglia more effectively than other methods

We compared the efficacy of liposomal clodronate to that of previously reported methods in terms of microglial elimination [6, 13, 41]. Seven days after preparation of primary astrocyte cultures, microglial elimination was performed via exposure to liposomal clodronate, flow cytometric purification or the shake-off method, and the contaminating ratio of microglia was determined using flow cytometric analysis and immunostaining (Figure 5A–D). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the conventional shake-off method significantly reduced the number of contaminating microglia, but a large number still remained (13.1 ± 0.8%, Figure 5A, C). Although effective microglial elimination was achieved by flow cytometric purification, a few microglia remained in the purified astrocyte cultures (0.7 ± 0.2%, Figure 5A, C). In contrast, no microglia were observed after exposure to liposomal clodronate (Figure 5A, C). Quantification of immunostaining by digital image analysis confirmed the efficacy of liposomal clodronate compared with the conventional shake-off method and flow cytometric purification (Figure 5B, D). These results were further confirmed using RT-PCR and qPCR. Although gene expression of Iba1, Cx3cr1, and Itgam (also known as Cd11b) was observed in primary cells after conventional shake-off and flow cytometric purification, their expression was not detected after exposure to liposomal clodronate (Figure 5E, F). In addition, many PI-positive cells were observed among the CD11b-negative population 24 h after flow cytometric purification (Figure 5G), suggesting that flow cytometric purification could affect the viability of astrocytes. Because primary astrocyte cultures are typically used for several months after their preparation [42, 43], the microglia-eliminated cultures should be maintained over time. Immunostaining and flow cytometric analysis confirmed that the microglia-eliminated culture was stably maintained for eight weeks after exposure to liposomal clodronate (Figure 5H). These results demonstrated that liposomal clodronate is optimal for microglial elimination from primary astrocyte cultures compared to other methods.

Figure 5
figure 5

Comparison of microglia-decontamination methods. (A) Flow-cytometric assessment of enrichment of microglia in primary astrocyte cultures. Microglia (CD45int/CD11bposi/Gr-1nega-int) were not observed in primary astrocyte cultures after exposure to liposomal clodronate. (B) Immunostaining using Iba1 (red) and GFAP (green) antibodies. Scale bar, 50 μm. (C) The number of CD45-positive microglia in primary astrocyte cultures determined by FACS analysis (n = 6). (D) Quantification of the number of Iba1-positive microglia to the total number of cells in primary astrocyte cultures (n = 6). (E, F) Comparison of the gene expression of microglial markers such as Iba1, Cx3cr1, and Itgam (also known to CD11b) using semi-quantitative (E) and qPCR (F, n = 6). (G) The viability of astrocytes after exposure to liposomal clodronate or flow cytometric purification. There were few PI-positive dead cells 24 h after exposure to liposomal clodronate, but a large number of astrocytes were positive for PI 24 h after flow cytometric purification. (H, I) Flow cytometric analysis (H) and immunostaining (I) of astrocyte cultures 42 days after exposure to liposomal clodronate. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Delayed exposure to liposomal clodronate eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures

Many authors have established various types of genetically modified astrocytes [29]. To examine the availability of delayed exposure to liposomal clodronate to these established culture lines, unpurified astrocyte cultures were exposed to liposomal clodronate eight weeks after preparation, in which more microglia exist than those at one week after the preparation (Figure 1L, M). Immunocytologic analysis performed three days after treatment revealed that 100 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate for 12 h eliminated microglia from unpurified cultures [see Additional file 2. These results indicate that this method can eliminate microglia from already established astrocyte cultures.

Microglial contamination considerably affects the analytical results of primary astrocyte culture

Finally, we compared the temporal gene expression changes of pro-inflammatory cytokines after IL-6 stimulation in microglia-contaminated and microglia-eliminated primary astrocyte cultures. After 1 h of IL-6 stimulation, the nuclear translocation of pSTAT3 was observed in astrocytes and microglia (Figure 6A, B), suggesting activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in both astrocytes and microglia. In contrast, only GFAP-positive cells exhibited pSTAT3 accumulation in the nuclear region in microglia-eliminated astrocyte cultures (Figure 6C). qPCR demonstrated that IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α expression was significantly up-regulated in microglia-contaminated cultures (Figure 6D). However, in microglia-eliminated cultures, only IL-6 expression was significantly up-regulated (Figure 6D). The time course of the gene expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in conventional primary astrocyte cultures was similar to that in the BV-2 microglial cell line (Figure 6E). These results suggest that rapid TNF-α and IL-1β gene induction in conventional primary astrocyte cultures after IL-6 stimulation was attributed to the activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in contaminating microglia. To directly confirm these results, conventional primary astrocyte cultures at 1 h after IL-6 stimulation were sorted into CD11b-positive and CD11b-negative populations by flow cytometer, and the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in each population was examined. qPCR analysis confirmed that IL-6 expression was upregulated in the CD11b-negative population and that TNF-α and IL-1β expression was upregulated in the CD11b-positive population (Figure 6F). These results highlight the importance of ensuring microglia elimination from astrocyte cultures to precisely clarify astrocyte biology.

Figure 6
figure 6

Contaminating microglia rapidly produce TNF-α and IL-1β after IL-6 stimulation. (A–C) Triple immunostaining using GFAP (blue), CD68 (green), and pSTAT3 (red) antibodies. Before IL-6 stimulation, pSTAT3 accumulation was rarely observed (A), but pSTAT3 accumulation was observed in microglia-contaminated (B) and microglia-eliminated astrocyte cultures (C) 1 h after IL-6 stimulation. pSTAT3 accumulation was observed in GFAP- and CD68-positive cells. Inset shows high magnification image of nuclear accumulation of STAT3 in microglia. Scale bar, 100 μm. (D) Time course of the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in microglia-contaminated or microglia-eliminated astrocytes after IL-6 stimulation (n = 5). (E) Time course of the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in BV2 cells after IL-6 stimulation (n = 3). (F) Gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in FACS-purified CD11b-positive and CD11b-negative populations from conventional microglia-contaminated primary astrocyte cultures 1 h after IL-6 stimulation (n = 3). *P <0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple-comparison test (D, E), Mann–Whitney U test (F). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.

Full size image

Discussion

Recent evidence has revealed the novel roles of astrocytes in CNS development and function [1–3, 44, 45]. Since astrocyte dysfunction has direct effects on neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease, and Huntington’s disease [46], elucidation of astrocyte function under defined conditions can facilitate the development of new treatment strategies for CNS disorders [5, 47, 48]. Consequently, there is increasing interest in understanding astrocyte biology [1, 5, 48]. Although in vivo experiments have provided a considerable amount of information regarding the mechanisms of action [29, 49–51], the complex cell–cell interactions and cytokine networks confound the interpretation of these results. In this regard, in vitro experiments are advantageous for investigating the biology of these cells because of the direct accessibility to components involved in a specific reaction. However, in primary astrocyte cultures, this advantage has been hindered by the difficulty in eliminating microglia and controlling astrocyte–microglia interactions [6]. Many authors have been concerned about the astrocyte culture system because microglial contamination, even though it was a small number of cells, could potentially affect astrocyte responses [52–54], confound the interpretation of results, and provide false information regarding astrocyte biology [6, 11, 12, 55–58]. In fact, microglial contamination has been the cause of the incorrect assertion of production of nitric oxide and apolipoprotein E by astrocytes [6, 30, 55, 59, 60]. Although there are several methods to decrease the number of microglia in astrocyte cultures, no method has completely eliminated microglia from these cultures [6]. In this study, we demonstrated that exposure to liposomal clodronate completely eliminated microglia from primary astrocyte cultures, without affecting the viability, proliferation, or activation of astrocytes.

The most widely used technique for harvesting a single population of glia is dependent on a mechanical shake-off method based on the differential adherence properties of glia to the plastic of culture flasks/dishes [6, 59]; astrocytes adhere more strongly to the plastic of culture flasks/dishes than other glia. Although repetitive shaking reduces the contaminating microglia on top of the monolayers, this method cannot achieve complete microglia elimination [6], especially when glia are strongly adherent to the plastic flasks/dishes or blanketed by astrocyte monolayers as shown in Figure 1B. As another method to reduce microglial contamination, anti-mitotic agents, such as 1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine (Ara-C) have been employed to eliminate proliferating microglia in primary astrocyte cultures [61, 62]. However, it is reported that low concentrations of Ara-C induces growth arrest and reactive responses in astrocytes while high concentrations kill astrocytes [63]. Because Ara-C is a potent S-phase–specific anti-tumor agent, it is likely to affect astrocytes, especially proliferating astrocytes [55]. Moreover, this agent only eliminates proliferating microglia and has little effect on non-proliferating microglia. l-Leucine methyl ester (LME), a lysosomotropic agent, has also been used to eliminate microglia, and effective reduction has been reported [56]. However, LME is toxic to astrocytes under some conditions because of its free diffusion into cells [43, 55]. Indeed, it has been reported that LME unexpectedly affected the adhesion capacity [55] and reactivity of astrocytes [43, 55].

Unlike previously used agents, liposomal clodronate selectively eliminated microglia without affecting the viability, proliferation or activation of astrocytes. This excellent result was obtained because of a strategy based on the different phagocytic activities of astrocytes and microglia. Although a high concentration of free clodronate affects the activities of cells via a non-specific extracellular mechanism, such as increasing their membrane permeability, clodronate is not a toxic molecule by itself in the extracellular environment [25]. Liposomes are also non-toxic and cannot freely move into cells [25]. Therefore, liposome-encapsulated clodronate rarely affects non-phagocytic cells [25]. In contrast, liposomal clodronate is readily absorbed by phagocytic cells, resulting in its rapid accumulation in the cytoplasm followed by the induction of apoptosis. Many authors have demonstrated that the liposome-mediated intracellular delivery of clodronate selectively eliminated macrophages without inducing toxicity in other cells [22, 24, 27, 37]. Because microglia are resident CNS immune cells that are functionally equivalent to macrophages, their functions include phagocytosis and antigen presentation [64]. In the CNS, they not only clear cellular debris from the area in pathological conditions [53], but also continuously engulf tissue components in normal physiological conditions [16]. Indeed, their substantial phagocytic activity was confirmed in vitro, but phagocytic activity was not observed in astrocytes or other CNS cells [65].

Another strategy to reduce microglial contamination is cell surface marker-based sorting [13, 41]. However, positive astrocyte selection cannot be performed because of the lack of a specific surface marker for astrocytes. In addition, although this method can effectively reduce the number of microglia from the primary astrocyte culture, this method requires specialized machinery, such as flow cytometric or magnetic cell sorting systems [13]. Therefore, this strategy is excellent but lacks versatility, resulting in its limited use. In contrast, our method requires only liposomal clodronate and, therefore, has broad utility for analyzing astrocyte biology. Furthermore, liposomal clodronate can eliminate human, rat and mouse macrophage-like cells [22, 25]. The number of contaminating microglia in mouse primary astrocyte cultures is higher than that in other species [6], indicating that our method would be directly applicable to other species.

Neuroinflammation is a common pathological feature of the CNS, and astrocytes are strongly implicated in the initiation and development of neuroinflammation [13]. Therefore, many experimental studies are conducted to elucidate the molecular responses of astrocytes during neuroinflammation. In this study, we used microglia-eliminated cultures and found that astrocytes produced IL-6, but TNF-α and IL-1β, following the activation of JAK/STAT pathway. Since the up-regulation of the IL-6 gene in astrocytes may be because of the STAT3 function in a positive feedback loop to regulate gene expression, STAT3 may not be directly related to the pro-inflammatory properties of astrocytes. Conversely, all of these pro-inflammatory cytokines were up-regulated after IL-6 stimulation of microglia-contaminated astrocytes cultures due to the co-activation of contaminating microglia. These findings indicate the significance of our purified culture system to study neuroinflammatory responses of astrocytes. Our method will allow understanding of the functional responses of astrocytes to different inflammatory cytokines/chemokines without the complex effects of microglia and inflammatory networks present during neuroinflammation.

Although our method permits selective assessment for astrocytes, they are surrounded by microglia and their response is modified by microglia in the CNS [17]. Therefore, a detailed understanding of astrocyte-microglia cross-talk is also important to elucidate the disease onset and progression [44]. In this respect, astrocyte cultures with microglia offer an advantage over microglia-eliminated astrocyte cultures. In addition, microglial response also needs to be assessed without complex cell-cell interaction. In this study, we used immortalized microglia cell line BV-2 to assess microglial pro-inflammatory properties, their responses may not entirely reflect microglial responses in the CNS due to their partial failure in mounting immune responses while also revealing spontaneous activities [66]. Primary microglia will be useful to understand their inflammatory responses in the CNS. In the future, selective as well as interactive analysis for primary glial cells will provide new clues to treat CNS disease.

Conclusions

In summary, our method for eliminating microglia from primary astrocyte cultures is simple, versatile and highly efficient. Because liposomal clodronate did not alter the activation or proliferation of astrocytes, these astrocyte cultures are immediately available for experiment, analysis, or further subpopulation sorting or culturing. Our method will help elucidate the reaction of astrocytes to a specific substance and the functional roles of astrocytes in physiological and pathological conditions, which will provide clues to understanding the role of astrocytes in neural disease, development and function. More careful analyses of the many functions of astrocytes in microglia-eliminated cultures is warranted to accurately understand astrocyte biology.

Abbreviations

Ara-C:

1-β-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine

BrdU:

5-bromo-20-deoxyuridine

CNS:

Central nervous system

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

FACS:

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

Iba1:

Ionized calcium-binding adaptor molecule 1

IL-6:

Interleukin-6 IL-1β, interleukin-1β

JAK:

Janus kinase

LME:

l-leucine methyl-ester

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

PE:

Phycoerythrin

PFA:

paraformaldehyde

PI:

Propidium iodide

STAT:

Signal transducer and activator of transcription

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha.

References

  1. Allen NJ, Barres BA: NEUROSCIENCE Glia - more than just brain glue. Nature 2009, 457:675–677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sofroniew MV, Vinters HV: Astrocytes: biology and pathology. Acta Neuropathol 2010, 119:7–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steindler DA, Silver DJ: Common astrocytic programs during brain development, injury and cancer. Trends Neurosci 2009, 32:303–311.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Okada S, Ishii K, Yamane J, Iwanami A, Ikegami T, Katoh H, Iwamoto Y, Nakamura M, Miyoshi H, Okano HJ, Contag CH, Toyama Y, Okano H: In vivoimaging of engrafted neural stem cells: its application in evaluating the optimal timing of transplantation for spinal cord injury. FASEB J 2005, 19:1839–1841.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sofroniew MV: Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci 2009, 32:638–647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Saura J: Microglial cells in astroglial cultures: a cautionary note. J Neuroinflammation 2007, 4:26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy KD, de Vellis J: Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue. J Cell Biol 1980, 85:890–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kimelberg HK, Schools GP, Cai Z, Zhou M: Freshly isolated astrocyte (FIA) preparations: a useful single cell system for studying astrocyte properties. J Neurosci Res 2000, 61:577–587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson E, Thorlin T: Brain primary cultures and vibrodissociated cells as tools for the study of astroglial properties and functions. Dev Neurosci 1999, 21:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Booher J, Sensenbrenner M: Growth and cultivation of dissociated neurons and glial cells from embryonic chick, rat and human brain in flask cultures. Neurobiology 1972, 2:97–105.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobrenis K: Microglia in cell culture and in transplantation therapy for central nervous system disease. Methods 1998, 16:320–344.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ciccarelli R, Di Iorio P, D’Alimonte I, Giuliani P, Florio T, Caciagli F, Middlemiss PJ, Rathbone MP: Cultured astrocyte proliferation induced by extracellular guanosine involves endogenous adenosine and is raised by the co-presence of microglia. Glia 2000, 29:202–211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarma JD, Marek R, Caruso M, Rostami A, Grinspan JB: Magnetic cell sorting: a fast and effective method of concurrent isolation of high purity viable astrocytes and microglia from neonatal mouse brain tissue. J Neurosci Methods 2008, 175:108–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M: RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 2009, 10:57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, Littman DR, Dustin ML, Gan WB: ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injuryin vivo. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8:752–758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F: Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchymain vivo. Science 2005, 308:1314–1318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang D, Hu XM, Qian L, O’Callaghan JP, Hong JS: Astrogliosis in CNS pathologies: is there a role for microglia? Mol Neurobiol 2010, 41:232–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SU, de Vellis J: Microglia in health and disease. J Neurosci Res 2005, 81:302–313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumamaru H, Saiwai H, Ohkawa Y, Yamada H, Iwamoto Y, Okada S: Age-related differences in cellular and molecular profiles of inflammatory responses after spinal cord injury. J Cell Physiol 2012, 227:1335–1346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DeWitt DA, Perry G, Cohen M, Doller C, Silver J: Astrocytes regulate microglial phagocytosis of senile plaque cores of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol 1998, 149:329–340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Russell RG, Rogers MJ: Bisphosphonates: from the laboratory to the clinic and back again. Bone 1999, 25:97–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monkkonen J, Taskinen M, Auriola SOK, Urtti A: Growth-inhibition of macrophage-like and other cell-types by liposome-encapsulated, calcium-bound, and free bisphosphonatesin vitro. J Drug Target 1994, 2:299–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Popovich PG, Guan Z, Wei P, Huitinga I, van Rooijen N, Stokes BT: Depletion of hematogenous macrophages promotes partial hindlimb recovery and neuroanatomical repair after experimental spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 1999, 158:351–365.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Monkkonen J, Heath TD: The effects of liposome-encapsulated and free clodronate on the growth of macrophage-like cellsin vitro- the role of calcium and iron. Calcif Tissue Int 1993, 53:139–146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vanrooijen N, Sanders A: Liposome-mediated depletion of macrophages - mechanism of action, preparation of liposomes and applications. J Immunol Methods 1994, 174:83–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Rooijen N, Sanders A, van den Berg TK: Apoptosis of macrophages induced by liposome-mediated intracellular delivery of clodronate and propamidine. J Immunol Methods 1996, 193:93–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ylitalo R, Monkkonen J, Yla-Herttuala S: Effects of liposome-encapsulated bisphosphonates on acetylated LDL metabolism, lipid accumulation and viability of phagocyting cells. Life Sci 1997, 62:413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Faustino JV, Wang X, Johnson CE, Klibanov A, Derugin N, Wendland MF, Vexler ZS: Microglial cells contribute to endogenous brain defenses after acute neonatal focal stroke. J Neurosci 2011, 31:12992–13001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Okada S, Nakamura M, Katoh H, Miyao T, Shimazaki T, Ishii K, Yamane J, Yoshimura A, Iwamoto Y, Toyama Y, Okano H: Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Nat Med 2006, 12:829–834.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hamby ME, Hewett JA, Hewett SJ: TGF-beta1 potentiates astrocytic nitric oxide production by expanding the population of astrocytes that express NOS-2. Glia 2006, 54:566–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. van Rooijen N, Hendrikx E: Liposomes for specific depletion of macrophages from organs and tissues. Methods Mol Biol 2010, 605:189–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohsawa K, Imai Y, Nakajima K, Kohsaka S: Generation and characterization of a microglial cell line, MG5, derived from a p53-deficient mouse. Glia 1997, 21:285–298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kataoka A, Tozaki-Saitoh H, Koga Y, Tsuda M, Inoue K: Activation of P2X(7) receptors induces CCL3 production in microglial cells through transcription factor NFAT. J Neurochem 2009, 108:115–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blasi E, Barluzzi R, Bocchini V, Mazzolla R, Bistoni F: Immortalization of murine microglial cells by a V-Raf/V-Myc carrying retrovirus. J Neuroimmunol 1990, 27:229–237.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shiratori M, Tozaki-Saitoh H, Yoshitake M, Tsuda M, Inoue K: P2X7 receptor activation induces CXCL2 production in microglia through NFAT and PKC/MAPK pathways. J Neurochem 2010, 114:810–819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saiwai H, Ohkawa Y, Yamada H, Kumamaru H, Harada A, Okano H, Yokomizo T, Iwamoto Y, Okada S: The LTB4-BLT1 axis mediates neutrophil infiltration and secondary injury in experimental spinal cord injury. Am J Pathol 2010, 176:2352–2366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Claassen I, Vanrooijen N, Claassen E: A new method for removal of mononuclear phagocytes from heterogeneous cell-populationsin vitro, using the liposome-mediated macrophage suicide technique. J Immunol Methods 1990, 134:153–161.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dehghani F, Conrad A, Kohl A, Korf HW, Hailer NP: Clodronate inhibits the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and NO by isolated microglial cells and reduces the number of proliferating glial cells in excitotoxically injured organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Exp Neurol 2004, 189:241–251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hailer NP, Kohl A, Dehghani F, Korf HW: The bisphosphonate clodronate depletes microglial cells in excitotoxically injured organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Exp Neurol 2003, 181:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. van Neerven S, Nemes A, Imholz P, Regen T, Denecke B, Johann S, Beyer C, Hanisch UK, Mey J: Inflammatory cytokine release of astrocytesin vitrois reduced by all-trans retinoic acid. J Neuroimmunol 2010, 229:169–179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Jauneau AC, Ischenko A, Chatagner A, Benard M, Chan P, Schouft MT, Patte C, Vaudry H, Fontaine M: Interleukin-1beta and anaphylatoxins exert a synergistic effect on NGF expression by astrocytes. J Neuroinflammation 2006, 3:8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Langan TJ, Slater MC: Astrocytes derived from long-term primary cultures recapitulate features of astrogliosis as they re-enter the cell division cycle. Brain Res 1992, 577:200–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guillemin G, Boussin FD, Croitoru J, FranckDuchenne M, LeGrand R, Lazarini F, Dormont D: Obtention and characterization of primary astrocyte and microglial cultures from adult monkey brains. J Neurosci Res 1997, 49:576–591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Leveland DW, Lobsiger CS: Glial cells as intrinsic components of non-cell-autonomous neurodegenerative disease. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:1355–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Farina C, Aloisi F, Meinl E: Astrocytes are active players in cerebral innate immunity. Trends Immunol 2007, 28:138–145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Maragakis NJ, Rothstein JD: Mechanisms of disease: astrocytes in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006, 2:679–689.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Escartin C, Bonvento G: Targeted activation of astrocytes: a potential neuroprotective strategy. Mol Neurobiol 2008, 38:231–241.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gotz M, Robel S, Berninger B: The stem cell potential of glia: lessons from reactive gliosis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011, 12:88–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sofroniew MV, Myer DJ, Gurkoff GG, Lee SM, Hovda DA: Essential protective roles of reactive astrocytes in traumatic brain injury. Brain 2006, 129:2761–2772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Frisen J, Barnabe-Heider F, Goritz C, Sabelstrom H, Takebayashi H, Pfrieger FW, Meletis K: Origin of new glial cells in intact and injured adult spinal cord. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7:470–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Gotz M, Buffo A, Rite I, Tripathi P, Lepier A, Colak D, Horn AP, Mori T: Origin and progeny of reactive gliosis: A source of multipotent cells in the injured brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:3581–3586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Hanisch UK: Microglia as a source and target of cytokines. Glia 2002, 40:140–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hanisch UK, Kettenmann H: Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:1387–1394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Aloisi F: Immune function of microglia. Glia. 2001, 36:165–179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hewett SJ, Hamby ME, Uliasz TF, Hewett JA: Characterization of an improved procedure for the removal of microglia from confluent monolayers of primary astrocytes. J Neurosci Methods 2006, 150:128–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Giulian D, Baker TJ: Characterization of ameboid microglia isolated from developing mammalian brain. J Neurosci 1986, 6:2163–2178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tanaka J, Toku K, Sakanaka M, Maeda N: Morphological differentiation of microglial cells in culture: involvement of insoluble factors derived from astrocytes. Neurosci Res 1999, 34:207–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Brown DR, Schmidt B, Kretzschmar HA: A neurotoxic prion protein fragment enhances proliferation of microglia but not astrocytes in culture. Glia 1996, 18:59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Saura J, Petegnief V, Wu X, Liang Y, Paul SM: Microglial apolipoprotein E and astroglial apolipoprotein J expressionin vitro: opposite effects of lipopolysaccharide. J Neurochem 2003, 85:1455–1467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Mori K, Yokoyama A, Yang L, Maeda N, Mitsuda N, Tanaka J: L-serine-mediated release of apolipoprotein E and lipids from microglial cells. Exp Neurol 2004, 185:220–231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Blomstrand F, Giaume C: Kinetics of endothelin-induced inhibition and glucose permeability of astrocyte gap junctions. J Neurosci Res 2006, 83:996–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tabernero A, Sanchez-Alvarez R, Medina JM: Increased levels of cyclins D1 and D3 after inhibition of gap junctional communication in astrocytes. J Neurochem 2006, 96:973–982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Michel PP, Ruberg M, Agid Y: Rescue of mesencephalic dopamine neurons by anticancer drug cytosine arabinoside. J Neurochem 1997, 69:1499–1507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Streit WJ: Microglia as neuroprotective, immunocompetent cells of the CNS. Glia 2002, 40:133–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Magnus T, Chan A, Linker RA, Toyka KV, Gold R: Astrocytes are less efficient in the removal of apoptotic lymphocytes than microglia cells: implications for the role of glial cells in the inflamed central nervous system. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2002, 61:760–766.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Horvath RJ, Nutile-McMenemy N, Alkaitis MS, De Leo JA: Differential migration, LPS-induced cytokine, chemokine, and NO expression in immortalized BV-2 and HAPI cell lines and primary microglial cultures. J Neurochem 2008, 107:557–569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in parts by a Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (B), Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (Comprehensive Brain Science Network and Neural Diversity and Neocortical Organization), Challenging Exploratory Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, and research foundations from ZENKYOREN and the general insurance association of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Hiromi Kumamaru, Hirokazu Saiwai, Kazu Kobayakawa, Kensuke Kubota, Yukihide Iwamoto & Seiji Okada

  2. Department of Advanced Medical Initiatives, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Seiji Okada

  3. Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, The Netherlands

    Nico van Rooijen

  4. Department of Molecular and System Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan

    Kazuhide Inoue

Authors
  1. Hiromi Kumamaru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hirokazu Saiwai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazu Kobayakawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kensuke Kubota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nico van Rooijen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazuhide Inoue
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yukihide Iwamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Seiji Okada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seiji Okada.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Authors’ contributions

HK designed studies, performed immuocytometric, flow cytometric, and gene expression analyses, and drafted the manuscript. HS supervised the overall project and performed flow cytometric analysis. KK performed qualitative assessments of microglia and gene expression analysis, and performed immuocytometric analysis. NvR supervised liposomal clodronate studies and assisted in manuscript preparation. KI supervised microglial studies and assisted in manuscript preparation. YI designed the studies and supervised the overall project. SO designed the studies, supervised the overall project, and performed the final manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Primer list. (PDF 21 KB)

12974_2012_647_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Liposomal clodronate eliminates microglia from long-term cultured astrocytes. At eight weeks after the preparation, primary astrocyte cultures were exposed with liposomal clodronate. (A-B) Double immunostaining using GFAP (green) and Iba1 (red) antibodies at three days after exposure to liposomal clodronate. (A) 100 μg/mL of liposomal clodronate completely eliminated microglia during three days of exposure. (B) 100 μg/mL concentration of liposomal clodronate completely eliminated microglia over 12 h of exposure duration. Scar bar, 500 μm. (PDF 671 KB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumamaru, H., Saiwai, H., Kobayakawa, K. et al. Liposomal clodronate selectively eliminates microglia from primary astrocyte cultures. J Neuroinflammation 9, 116 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-116

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-9-116

Keywords

Journal of Neuroinflammation

ISSN: 1742-2094