Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics

This article has been updated

Abstract

There is much interest in using magnetic resonance diffusion imaging to provide information on anatomical connectivity in the brain by measuring the diffusion of water in white matter tracts. Among the measures, the most commonly derived from diffusion data is fractional anisotropy (FA), which quantifies local tract directionality and integrity. Many multi-subject imaging studies are using FA images to localize brain changes related to development, degeneration and disease. In a recent paper, we presented a new approach, tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS), which aims to solve crucial issues of cross-subject data alignment, allowing localized cross-subject statistical analysis. This works by transforming the data from the centers of the tracts that are consistent across a study's subjects into a common space. In this protocol, we describe the MRI data acquisition and analysis protocols required for TBSS studies of localized change in brain connectivity across multiple subjects.

NOTE: In the version of this article originally published online, the URL given in EQUIPMENT SETUP, under “Computing equipment”, should have been http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl. In the first line of Box 2, “head motion” should have read “head motion effects”. In the legend to Figure 1, “and a ˙ b value" should have been “and a b value” and "an signal-to-noise ratio" should have been "a signal-to-noise ratio". These errors have been corrected in all versions of the article.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Example good-quality fractional anisotropy image and its intensity histogram, after format conversion and rescaling of the original intensity range from 0:1 to 0:10,000.
Figure 2: Example mean fractional anisotropy (FA) skeleton (red-orange, thresholded at mean FA = 0.3), overlaid on four subjects' non-linearly registered FA images.
Figure 3: Example results from a tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) analysis of 13 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and 20 controls.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 29 March 2007

    In the version of this article originally published online, the URL given in EQUIPMENT SETUP, under “Computing equipment”, should have been http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl. In the first line of Box 2, “head motion” should have read “head motion effects”. In the legend to Figure 1, “and a ˙ b value" should have been “and a b value” and "an signal-to-noise ratio" should have been "a signal-to-noise ratio". These errors have been corrected in all versions of the article.

References

  1. Moseley, M.E. et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of anisotropic water diffusion in cat central nervous system. Radiology 176, 439–445 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Bihan, D. Looking into the functional architecture of the brain with diffusion MRI. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 469–480 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Horsfield, M.A. & Jones, D.K. Application of diffusion-weighted and diffusion tensor MRI to white matter diseases—a review. NMR Biomed. 15, 570–577 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim, K.O. & Helpern, J.A. Neuropsychiatric applications of DTI—a review. NMR Biomed. 15, 587–593 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moseley, M. Diffusion tensor imaging and aging—a review. NMR Biomed. 15, 553–560 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neil, J., Miller, J., Mukherjee, P. & Huppi, P.S. Diffusion tensor imaging of normal and injured developing human brain—a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15, 543–552 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buxton, R.B. Diffusion and the MR signal. In Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 185–216 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori, S., Wakana, S., Nagae-Poetscher, L.M. & van Zijl, P.C.M. MRI Atlas of Human White Matter. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pierpaoli, C. & Basser, P.J. Toward a quantitive assessment of diffusion anisotropy. Magn. Reson. Med. 36, 893–906 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beaulieu, C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system—a technical review. NMR Biomed. 15, 435–455 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ashburner, J. & Friston, K.J. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. NeuroImage 11, 805–821 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, S.M. et al. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. NeuroImage 31, 1487–1505 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rueckert, D. et al. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18, 712–721 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiervang, E., Behrens, T.E., Mackay, C.E., Robson, M.D. & Johansen-Berg, H. Between session reproducibility and between subject variability of diffusion MR and tractography measures. NeuroImage 33, 867–877 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, D.K., Symms, M.R., Cercignani, M. & Howard, R.J. The effect of filter size on VBM analyses of DT-MRI data. NeuroImage 26, 546–554 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Worsley, K.J. et al. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum. Brain Mapp. 4, 58–73 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nichols, T.E. & Holmes, A.P. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 1–25 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones, D.K., Horsfield, M.A. & Simmons, A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 515–525 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones, D.K. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn. Reson. Med. 51, 807–815 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Behrens, T.E.J. et al. Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 50, 1077–1088 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gudbjartsson, H. & Patz, S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 910–914 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Andersson, J.L.R., Skare, S. & Ashburner, J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. NeuroImage 20, 870–888 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, C., Bammer, R., Kim, D.-H. & Moseley, M.E. Self-navigated interleaved spiral (SNAILS): application to high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 52, 1388–1396 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pipe, J.G., Farthing, V.G. & Forbes, K.P. Multishot diffusion-weighted FSE using PROPELLER MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 42–52 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alexander, D.C. & Barker, G.J. Optimal imaging parameters for fiber-orientation estimation in diffusion MRI. NeuroImage 27, 357–367 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pierpaoli, C., Marenco, S., Rohde, G., Jones, D.K. & Barnett, A.S. Analyzing the contribution of cardiac pulsation to the variability of quantities derived from the diffusion tensor. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 70 (2003).

  27. Pruessmann, K.P. Encoding and reconstruction in parallel MRI. NMR Biomed. 19, 288–299 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bammer, R. et al. Diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot SENSE-EPI. Magn. Reson. Med. 48, 128–136 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Smith, S.M., Johansen-Berg, H., Mackay, C., Behrens, T.E. & Bartsch, A.J. Voxelwise analysis of FA data: session and subject variability, Gaussianity and dependence on acquisition. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 1063 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that the competing financial interests are too numerous to itemize.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, S., Johansen-Berg, H., Jenkinson, M. et al. Acquisition and voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data with Tract-Based Spatial Statistics. Nat Protoc 2, 499–503 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.45

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.45

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing