Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Digging and marble burying in mice: simple methods for in vivo identification of biological impacts

Abstract

Mice exhibit various species-typical behaviors such as digging and burrowing. They dig in the ground to find food, to hoard food, to create a refuge from predators or cold and to make a safe nursery area for the young. In the laboratory, mice dig vigorously in deep bedding such as wood chips. This behavior is sensitive to strain differences and drugs. For example, the effects of anxiolytics and 5-HT-active compounds, including those used clinically for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), can be detected. Digging can be quantified by manual timing. Alternatively, the bedding can be covered with glass marbles and the number buried can be counted after a set time. These behaviors can be assessed using very little specialized equipment, and results can be obtained from ten animals in about an hour. Species-typical behaviors may be sensitive to a wide variety of treatments, and their simplicity and ability to yield robust quantitative data might be particularly useful in assessing genetically modified mice, even in laboratories not primarily oriented to behavioral work.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Webster, D.G., Williams, M.H., Owens, R.D., Geiger, V.B. & Dewsbury D.A. Digging behavior in 12 taxa of muroid rodents. Anim. Learn. Behav. 9, 173–177 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dudek, B.C., Adams, N., Boice, R. & Abbott, M.E. Genetic influences on digging behaviours in mice (Mus musculus) in laboratory and seminatural settings. J. Comp. Psychol. 97, 249–259 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Borsini, F., Podhorna, J. & Marazziti, D. Do animal models of anxiety predict anxiolytic effects of antidepressants? Psychopharmacology 163, 121–141 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Njung'e, K. & Handley, S.L. Evaluation of marble-burying behavior as a model of anxiety. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 38, 63–67 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deacon, R.M.J. & Rawlins, J.N.P. Hippocampal lesions, species-typical behaviours and anxiety in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 156, 241–249 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pinel, J.P.J. & Treit, D. Burying as a defensive response in rats. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 92, 708–712 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poling, A., Cleary, J. & Monaghan, M. Burying by rats in response to aversive and nonaversive stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 35, 31–44 (1981).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Broekkamp, C.L., Rijk, H.W., Joly-Gelouin, D. & Lloyd, K.L. Major tranquillizers can be distinguished from minor tranquillizers on the basis of effects on marble burying and swim-induced grooming in mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 126, 223–229 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Njung'e, K. & Handley, S.L. Effects of 5-HT uptake inhibitors, agonists and antagonists on the burying of harmless objects by mice: a putative test for anxiolytic agents. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 104, 105–112 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shinomiya, K. et al. Effect of paroxetine on marble-burying behavior in mice. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 10, 685–687 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, X., Morrow, D. & Witkin, J.M. Decreases in nestlet shredding of mice by serotonin uptake inhibitors: Comparison with marble burying. Life Sci. 78, 1933–1939 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Londei, T., Valentini, A.M.V. & Lione, V.G. Investigative burying by laboratory mice may involve non-functional, compulsive behaviour. Behav. Brain Res. 94, 249–254 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi, H., Yatsugi, S.-I. & Yamaguchi, T. Effect of YM992, a novel antidepressant with selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitory and 5-HT2A receptor antagonistic activity, on a marble-burying behavior test as an obsessive-compulsive disorder model. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 90, 197–200 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ichimaru, Y., Egawa, T. & Sawa, A. 5-HT1A-receptor subtype mediates the effect of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on marble-burying behavior in mice. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 68, 65–70 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gyertyan, I. Analysis of the marble burying response: marbles serve to measure digging rather than evoke burying. Behav. Pharmacol. 6, 24–31 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Masuda, Y., Ishigooka, S. & Matsuda, Y. Digging behavior of ddY mouse. Exp. Anim. 49, 235–237 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gray, J.A. & McNaughton, N. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety (2nd ed.). Oxford Univ. Press (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wicke, K. M. & Gross, G. Marble burying behavior is prevented by anxiolytics as well as by motorstimulants. Pharmacopsychiatry; 05, 2005 (lecture) http://www.thieme-connect.de/ejournals/abstract/pharmaco/doi/10.1055/s-2005-918875.

  19. Millan, M.-J., Girardon, S., Mullot, J., Brocco, M. & Dekeyne, A. Stereospecific blockade of marble-burying behaviour in mice by selective, non-peptidergic neurokinin1 (NK1) receptor antagonists. Neuropharmacology 42, 677–684 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant GR065438MA from the Wellcome Trust to the Oxford OXION group.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert M J Deacon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deacon, R. Digging and marble burying in mice: simple methods for in vivo identification of biological impacts. Nat Protoc 1, 122–124 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.20

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.20

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing