Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Taste-independent nutrient selection is mediated by a brain-specific Na+/solute co-transporter in Drosophila

Abstract

Animals can determine the nutritional value of sugar without the influence of taste. We examined a Drosophila mutant that is insensitive to the nutritional value of sugars, responding only to the concentration (that is, sweetness). The affected gene encodes a sodium/solute co-transporter–like protein, designated SLC5A11 (or cupcake), which is structurally similar to mammalian sodium/glucose co-transporters that transport sugar across the intestinal and renal lumen. However, SLC5A11 was prominently expressed in 10–13 pairs of R4 neurons of the ellipsoid body in the brain and functioned in these neurons for selecting appropriate foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A prandial rise in hemolymph glycemia is required for appropriate food choice behavior in starved flies.
Figure 2: SLC5A11, a member of the Drosophila sodium/solute co-transporter family, is required for taste-independent nutrient selection.
Figure 3: A subset of ellipsoid body R4 neurons is required for taste-independent nutrient selection.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sclafani, A. Appetite 36, 79–83 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. de Araujo, I.E. et al. Neuron 57, 930–941 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, C.J. & Waddell, S. Curr. Biol. 21, 746–750 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujita, M. & Tanimura, T. Curr. Biol. 21, 751–755 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stafford, J.W., Lynd, K.M., Jung, A.Y. & Gordon, M.D. J. Neurosci. 32, 14767–14774 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dus, M., Min, S., Keene, A.C., Lee, G.Y. & Suh, G.S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11644–11649 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bogdanove, E.M. & Barker, S.B. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 75, 77–80 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boll, W. & Noll, M. Development 129, 5667–5681 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wright, E.M., Loo, D.D. & Hirayama, B.A. Physiol. Rev. 91, 733–794 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Renn, S.C. et al. J. Neurobiol. 41, 189–207 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruta, V. et al. Nature 468, 686–690 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohlstein, B. & Spradling, A. Nature 439, 470–474 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Micchelli, C.A. & Perrimon, N. Nature 439, 475–479 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McGuire, S.E., Le, P.T., Osborn, A.J., Matsumoto, K. & Davis, R.L. Science 302, 1765–1768 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nitabach, M.N., Blau, J. & Holmes, T.C. Cell 109, 485–495 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Neuser, K., Triphan, T., Mronz, M., Poeck, B. & Strauss, R. Nature 453, 1244–1247 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ofstad, T.A., Zuker, C.S. & Reiser, M.B. Nature 474, 204–207 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O'Malley, D., Reimann, F., Simpson, A.K. & Gribble, F.M. Diabetes 55, 3381–3386 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Perdigoto for assistance with gut immunohistochemistry, members of the Suh laboratory, R. Davis, S. Burden and N. Ringstad for comments on the manuscript, and the Belasco laboratory and the New York University fly community at Skirball Institute for sharing their equipment. Financial support was provided by the Hilda and Preston Davis Foundation (M.D.), Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (M.A.), the Klarman Foundation, a Hirschl/Caulier Trust award, and US National Institutes of Health RO1 grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (G.S.B.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.S.B.S. and M.D. designed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. M.D. performed all of the experiments except those involving PA-GFP. M.A. performed the PA-GFP experiments. G.S.B.S., M.D. and M.A. edited the manuscript. G.S.B.S. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Greg S B Suh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Figures 1–9 (PDF 2355 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dus, M., Ai, M. & Suh, G. Taste-independent nutrient selection is mediated by a brain-specific Na+/solute co-transporter in Drosophila. Nat Neurosci 16, 526–528 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3372

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing