Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Modification of CO2 avoidance behaviour in Drosophila by inhibitory odorants

Abstract

The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster exhibits a robust and innate olfactory-based avoidance behaviour to CO2, a component of odour emitted from stressed flies1. Specialized neurons in the antenna and a dedicated neuronal circuit in the higher olfactory system mediate CO2 detection and avoidance1,2. However, fruitflies need to overcome this avoidance response in some environments that contain CO2 such as ripening fruits and fermenting yeast, which are essential food sources. Very little is known about the molecular and neuronal basis of this unique, context-dependent modification of innate olfactory avoidance behaviour. Here we identify a new class of odorants present in food that directly inhibit CO2-sensitive neurons in the antenna. Using an in vivo expression system we establish that the odorants act on the Gr21a/Gr63a CO2 receptor3. The presence of these odorants significantly and specifically reduces CO2-mediated avoidance behaviour, as well as avoidance mediated by ‘Drosophila stress odour’. We propose a model in which behavioural avoidance to CO2 is directly influenced by inhibitory interactions of the novel odours with CO2 receptors. Furthermore, we observe differences in the temporal dynamics of inhibition: the effect of one of these odorants lasts several minutes beyond the initial exposure. Notably, animals that have been briefly pre-exposed to this odorant do not respond to the CO2 avoidance cue even after the odorant is no longer present. We also show that related odorants are effective inhibitors of the CO2 response in Culex mosquitoes that transmit West Nile fever and filariasis. Our findings have broader implications in highlighting the important role of inhibitory odorants in olfactory coding, and in their potential to disrupt CO2-mediated host-seeking behaviour in disease-carrying insects like mosquitoes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inhibitory odours dramatically reduce response to CO2.
Figure 2: Inhibitory odorants directly affect CO 2 response of Gr21a/Gr63a in a heterologous system.
Figure 3: Avoidance behaviour to CO 2 and Drosophila stress odour is abolished by inhibitory odorants.
Figure 4: Inhibitory odours dramatically reduce CO 2 response in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suh, G. S. B. et al. A single population of olfactory sensory neurons mediates an innate avoidance behaviour in Drosophila . Nature 431, 854–859 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Suh, G. S. et al. Light activation of an innate olfactory avoidance response in Drosophila . Curr. Biol. 17, 905–908 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jones, W. D., Cayirlioglu, P., Kadow, I. G. & Vosshall, L. B. Two chemosensory receptors together mediate carbon dioxide detection in Drosophila . Nature 445, 86–90 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Guerenstein, P. G. & Hildebrand, J. G. Roles and effects of environmental carbon dioxide in insect life. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53, 161–178 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallem, E. A. & Sternberg, P. W. Acute carbon dioxide avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8038–8043 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clyne, P., Warr, C. & Carlson, J. Candidate taste receptors in Drosophila . Science 287, 1830–1834 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scott, K. et al. A chemosensory gene family encoding candidate gustatory and olfactory receptors in Drosophila . Cell 104, 661–673 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon, J. Y., Dahanukar, A., Weiss, L. A. & Carlson, J. R. The molecular basis of CO2 reception in Drosophila . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3574–3578 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Faucher, C., Forstreuter, M., Hilker, M. & de Bruyne, M. Behavioral responses of Drosophila to biogenic levels of carbon dioxide depend on life-stage, sex and olfactory context. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 2739–2748 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Golding, J. B., Shearer, D., Wyllie, S. G. & McGlasson, W. B. Application of 1-MCP and propylene to identify ethylene-dependent ripening processes in mature banana fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 14, 87–98 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Golding, J. B., Shearer, D., McGlasson, W. B. & Wyllie, S. G. Relationships between respiration, ethylene, and aroma production in ripening banana. J. Agric. Food Chem. 47, 1646–1651 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fischler, W., Kong, P., Marella, S. & Scott, K. The detection of carbonation by the Drosophila gustatory system. Nature 448, 1054–1057 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz, D. B. et al. Receptors, circuits, and behaviors: new directions in chemical senses. J. Neurosci. 28, 11802–11805 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Larsson, M. C. et al. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703–714 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Benton, R., Sachse, S., Michnick, S. W. & Vosshall, L. B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of Drosophila odorant receptors in vivo . PLoS Biol. 4, e20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mayr, D., Mark, T., Lindinger, W., Brevard, H. & Yeretzian, C. Breath-by-breath analysis of banana aroma by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 223–224, 743–756 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galliard, T., Matthew, J. A., Wright, A. J. & Fishwick, M. J. Enzymic breakdown of lipids to volatile and nonvolatile carbonyl fragments in disrupted tomato fruits. J. Sci. Food Agric. 28, 863–868 (1977)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Martineau, B., Henick-Kling, T. & Acree, T. Reassessment of the influence of malolactic fermentation on the concentration of diacetyl in wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46, 385–388 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nykanen, L. & Nykanen, I. in Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages (ed. Maarse, H.) 548–580 (Dekker, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hughes, P. S. & Baxter, E. D. in Beer: Quality, Safety and Nutritional Aspects 40–73 (Royal Society of Chemistry, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carde, R. T. Odour plumes and odour-mediated flight in insects. Ciba Found. Symp. 200, 54–66; discussion 66–70 (1996)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Bruyne, M., Foster, K. & Carlson, J. Odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron 30, 537–552 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallem, E. A. & Carlson, J. R. Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell 125, 143–160 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, T. et al. Odor coding in the maxillary palp of the malaria vector mosquito. Anopheles gambiae. Curr. Biol. 17, 1533–1544 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zwiebel, L. J. & Takken, W. Olfactory regulation of mosquito–host interactions. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 645–652 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cooperband, M. F. & Carde, R. T. Orientation of Culex mosquitoes to carbon dioxide-baited traps: flight manoeuvres and trapping efficiency. Med. Vet. Entomol. 20, 11–26 (2006)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Robertson, H. M. & Kent, L. B. Evolution of the gene lineage encoding the carbon dioxide receptor in insects. J. Insect Sci. 19, 1–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Dobritsa, A. A., van der Goes van Naters, W., Warr, C. G., Steinbrecht, R. A. & Carlson, J. R. Integrating the molecular and cellular basis of odor coding in the Drosophila antenna. Neuron 37, 827–841 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank W. van der Goes van Naters for help with setting up our electrophysiology rig, P. Atkinson and A. Kahlon for providing mosquitoes, J. Millar for providing reagents, and A. Dahanukar for commenting on the manuscript.

Author Contributions S.L.T. planned and performed the experiments and co-wrote the manuscript. A.R. planned the experiments, supervised the project and co-wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anandasankar Ray.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-6 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary References. (PDF 378 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, S., Ray, A. Modification of CO2 avoidance behaviour in Drosophila by inhibitory odorants. Nature 461, 277–281 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08295

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08295

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing