Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Physiology of visual cells in mouse superior colliculus and correlation with somatosensory and auditory input

Abstract

THE two main targets of the mammalian optic nerve fibres are the lateral geniculate body and the superior colliculus (optic tectum). From studies with various techniques, and in several mammalian species including the cat1–5, monkey6–9, rabbit10–12, rat13, and ground squirrel14 three major functions of the superior colliculus have been described. In the superficial layers the visual input is processed in a specific way; in deep layers several sense modalities, chiefly visual, auditory and somatosensory, are brought together; stimulation of the tectum results in an orienting of the animal's eyes, head or body towards a location corresponding topographically to the part of the tectum stimulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Gordon, B., J. Neurophysiol., 36, 157–178 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sprague, J. M., and Meikle, T. H., Expl Neurol., 11, 115–146 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stein, B. E., and Arigbede, M. O., Expl Neurol., 36, 179–196 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sterling, P., and Wickelgren, B. G., J. Neurophysiol., 32, 1–15 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Straschill, M., and Hoffmann, K. P., Brain Res., 13, 274–283 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cynader, M., and Berman, N., J. Neurophysiol., 35, 187–201 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldberg, M. E., and Wurtz, R. H., J. Neurophysiol., 35, 542–559 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson, D. L., Vision Res., 12, 1795–1808 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schiller, P. H., Invest. Ophthal., 11, 451–460 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Horn, G., and Hill, R. M., Expl Neurol., 14, 199–223 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Masland, R. H., Chow, K. L., and Stewart, D. L., J. Neurophysiol., 34, 148–156 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaefer, K. P., Brain Behav. Evol., 3, 222–240 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Humphrey, N. K., Expl Neurol., 20, 312–340 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael, C. R., Vision Res. Suppl., 3, 299–308 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dräger, U. C., J. comp. Neurol. (in the press).

  16. Kruger, L., Brain Behav. Evol., 3, 169–177 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DRAGER, U., HUBEL, D. Physiology of visual cells in mouse superior colliculus and correlation with somatosensory and auditory input. Nature 253, 203–204 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1038/253203a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/253203a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing