Sexual responses of the male rat medial preoptic area and medial amygdala to estrogen II: Site specific effects of selective estrogenic drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.04.017Get rights and content

Abstract

In the medial preoptic area (MPO) and medial amygdala (MEA), estradiol (E2) aromatized from testosterone (T) may act via either estrogen receptor (ER) α or ERβ to mediate mating in male rats. We tested the hypothesis that, in the MPO, ERα exclusively mediates sexual responses to E2 by monitoring mating in four groups of castrated male rats administered dihydrotestosterone (DHT) subcutaneously and MPO implants delivering either: cholesterol, E2, propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, ERα-agonist) or diarylpropionitrile (DPN, ER β-agonist); a fifth group of intact males served as DPN toxicity control, receiving DPN MPO implants. In a follow-up study, either 1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridinium (MPP, ERα-antagonist) or blank MPO cannulae were implanted in castrated male rats receiving T subcutaneously, whereas intact MPP toxicity controls received MPP MEA implants. PPT or E2 MPO implants maintained mating, but cholesterol or DPN MPO implants did not. Moreover, MPP MPO implants interfered with T reinstatement of mating suggesting that, in the MPO, ERα is necessary and sufficient for mating in androgen-maintained male rats and ERβ is not sufficient. Because it is unknown which ER subtype(s) mediate sexual responses of the MEA to E2, we examined mating following MEA implants of cholesterol, E2, PPT or DPN in four groups of castrated male rats administered DHT subcutaneously. E2 MEA implants maintained mounting but mating was significantly decreased in groups receiving PPT, DPN or cholesterol MEA implants suggesting that, unlike the MPO where ERα alone is essential, sexual responses of the MEA to E2 require simultaneous interactions among multiple ER subtypes.

Highlights

► Selective estrogenic drugs were put in male rat medial preoptic area (MPO) or medial amygdala (MEA). ► In MPO, ERα agonists promoted, ERα antagonists inhibited and ERβ agonists did not support mating. ► In MEA, estradiol, but not ERα agonists or ERβ agonists, supported mating. ► ERα mediates the sexual response of the male rat MPO to estrogen. ► The MEA responds differently to estrogen than the MPO and neither ERα nor ERβ alone mediate mating.

Introduction

Male rat mating behavior is dependent on testosterone (T), which is enzymatically converted in the brain into estradiol (E2) by aromatase (Naftolin et al., 1975) and into the non-aromatizable androgen, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by 5α reductase (Martini, 1982, Massa et al., 1972). These metabolites, together with T, act on steroid sensitive neurons, including those containing estrogen receptors (ER) in the medial preoptic area (MPO) (Vagell and McGinnis, 1997) and medial amygdala (MEA) (Huddleston et al., 2003, Huddleston et al., 2006) of the male rat brain to promote mating behavior. Thus, mating declines after castration and is reinstated by exogenous T (Christensen and Clemens, 1975, Davidson, 1966a, Davidson, 1966b, Davidson, 1969). Furthermore, castrated male rats mate normally (to ejaculation) after being treated with a combination of E2 and DHT, given in physiological dose ranges, and their mating behavior is comparable to that of rats treated with physiological levels of T (Baum and Vreeburg, 1973, Davidson, 1966a, Davidson, 1966b, Davidson, 1969, Larsson et al., 1973). When administered separately, however, neither E2 (Baum and Vreeburg, 1973, Davidson, 1969, Södersten, 1973) nor DHT (Feder, 1971, Feder et al., 1974, McGinnis and Dreifuss, 1989) fully maintains mating behavior, indicating that estrogens and androgens both are necessary for the normal expression of male rat sexual behavior. Fadrozole, a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (Lipton et al., 1990, Vagell and McGinnis, 1997) that blocks formation of E2 from T, administered either systemically (Bonsall et al., 1992) or intracerebrally into the MPO (Clancy et al., 1995) or MEA (Huddleston et al., 2006) attenuates male rat mating behavior, an effect that can be partially reversed via administration of E2 (Bonsall et al., 1992). Mating is also maintained by implants of E2 into the MPO (Clancy et al., 2000) or MEA (Huddleston et al., 2003) of gonadally intact male rats receiving fadrozole subcutaneously (s.c.) that blocks E2 formation elsewhere throughout the body and brain. Collectively, these studies suggest that estrogen is required for the expression of male rat mating behavior and specifically that estrogenic metabolites of T act on estrogen sensitive neurons in both the MPO (Clancy et al., 1995, Clancy et al., 2000) and the MEA (Huddleston et al., 2003, Huddleston et al., 2006).

Studies of mating-induced expression of Fos immunoreactivity (ir) show that Fos-ir occurs in MPO and MEA cells that contain receptors for gonadal steroids, including those that express ER-ir (Baum and Everitt, 1992, Coolen et al., 1996, Gréco et al., 1996, Gréco et al., 1998, Gréco et al., 2003). Steroid sensitive cells of the MPO and MEA are critical for expression of male rat mating behavior (Huddleston et al., 2007b, Simerly and Swanson, 1986).

Multiple subtypes of ER exist (Gréco et al., 2003, Kuiper et al., 1996), some of which may be located within the cell membranes of E2 responsive neurons (Evinger and Levin, 2005, Thomas et al., 2005). The second type of ER to be discovered was termed ERβ and the original ER is now known as ERα (Kuiper et al., 1996). ERα and ERβ are both expressed in steroid sensitive neurons of the rat MPO and MEA (Abraham et al., 2004, Gréco et al., 2003, Nomura et al., 2003, Shughrue and Merchanthaler, 2001, Shughrue et al., 1997). ER-Knock-Out (ERKO) experiments in male mice have shown that the deactivation of ERα significantly reduces mating behavior, while βERKO does not greatly decrease mating behavior (Ogawa et al., 1997, Ogawa et al., 1998, Ogawa et al., 2000, Rissman et al., 1997). However, the combined knock-out, of both ERα and ERβ completely eliminates all sexual behaviors of the male mice (Ogawa et al., 2000). This suggests that ERα may play a dominant role, and ERβ a minor role, in the expression of male sexual behavior (Ogawa et al., 1997, Ogawa et al., 1998, Ogawa et al., 2000, Rissman et al., 1997, Scordalakes et al., 2002). In light of this, it is noteworthy that infusion of an ERα antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (AS-ODN) to the MPO significantly decreased male rat mating behavior (Paisley et al., in press). In contrast, ERα AS-ODN infusion of the MEA locally inhibited ERα expression in the MEA, but there was no significant decrease in the mating behavior of male rats (Paisley et al., in press). These findings suggest two hypotheses: (i) in the MPO, ERα mediates sexual responses of male rats to E2 and (ii) the MEA responds differently to E2 than the MPO in that a different ER pathway, not ERα but perhaps ERβ, mediates the sexual response of the male rat MEA to E2.

Recently developed, highly selective estrogenic drugs that modulate ERα and/or ERβ activity may serve as powerful tools that might aid in identifying the behaviorally relevant ER isoform(s) in the male rat MPO and MEA that mediate sexual responses to E2 (Harrington et al., 2003, Hillisch et al., 2004). Therefore, we used selective estrogenic drugs implanted into the MPO to test the first hypothesis that, in the MPO, ERα mediates sexual responses of male rats to E2. In one experiment, four groups of male rats were castrated and administered DHT s.c. and then received bilateral MPO implants carrying one of the following drugs: i) cholesterol (negative control), ii) E2 (positive control), iii) propyl pyrazole triol (PPT, an ERα agonist; Stauffer et al., 2000) or iv) diarylpropionitrile (DPN, an ERβ agonist; Meyers et al., 2001). A fifth group was used as a DPN toxicity control that consisted of gonadally intact male rats that also received bilateral MPO DPN implants. In a second experiment, two groups of male rats were castrated, tested until mating behavior declined, and then implanted with T s.c. and bilateral MPO implants delivering either no drugs (blank) or the drug 1-methyl-4-phenyl pyridinium (MPP, an ERα antagonist; Zhou et al., 2009). In addition, a group of gonadally intact male rats received MPP bilateral MEA implants and served as an MPP toxicity control.

We also tested, using selective estrogenic drugs, the second hypothesis that the MEA responds differently to E2 than the MPO in that a different ER pathway, not ERα but perhaps ERβ, mediates the sexual response of the male rat MEA to E2 by comparing the sexual behavior of castrated male rats before and after the drug implantation into the MEA. Four groups of castrated, DHT s.c. maintained male rats received bilateral MEA implants containing one of the following drugs: (i) cholesterol (negative control), (ii) E2 (positive control), (iii) PPT (ERα agonist; Stauffer et al., 2000) or (iv) DPN (ERβ agonist; Meyers et al., 2001).

Section snippets

General methods

Information concerning animals, general surgical procedures, behavioral testing and statistical analysis that are common to both this paper and its companion report are fully described in the General Methods section of the companion report (Paisley et al., in press).

Male rat experimental groups and surgery

Upon completion of sexual screening trials, male rats that mated to ejaculation on at least one screening trial were matched according to total numbers of ejaculations during sexual screening trials, divided into groups and then

Male sexual behavior

The mating behavior of sexually experienced, castrated male rats receiving DHT s.c. was maintained by either E2 or PPT implants to the MPO, but neither cholesterol nor DPN MPO implants maintained mating (Fig. 1A). Gonadally intact DPN toxicity controls that received DPN MPO implants also mated robustly. Specifically, the two groups receiving either E2 or PPT MPO implants and gonadally intact DPN toxicity controls mated vigorously on all sexual behavior tests throughout the study and these three

Discussion

The objectives of these experiments were, first, to test the hypothesis that, in the MPO, ERα mediates the sexual responses of male rats to E2 and second, to test the hypothesis that the MEA responds differently to E2 than the MPO in that a different ER pathway, not ERα but perhaps ERβ, mediates the sexual responses of the male rat MEA to E2.

The first hypothesis was confirmed by examination of the copulatory response of animals implanted in the MPO with various selective ERα or ERβ agonists or

Acknowledgments

This work partially fulfills the Masters of Sciences degree requirements of the Department of Biology, Georgia State University for Nancy V. Russell, Ejiroghene V. Ogaga-Mgbonyebi and Biniyam Habteab and was supported by the National Science Foundation grant IBN 9876754 to the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and by a Brains and Behavior Program Seed Grant from Georgia State University.

References (77)

  • W.R. Harrington et al.

    Activities of estrogen receptor alpha- and beta-selective ligands at diverse estrogen responsive gene sites mediating transactivation or transrepression

    Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.

    (2003)
  • V.S. Harris et al.

    Copulatory behavior in male rats following amygdaloid lesions

    Brain Res.

    (1975)
  • G.G. Huddleston et al.

    Estradiol in the male rat amygdala facilitates mounting but not ejaculation

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2003)
  • Y. Kondo

    Lesions of the medial amygdale produce severe impairment of copulatory behavior in sexually inexperienced male rats

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1992)
  • R. Massa et al.

    The transformation of testosterone by the brain and anterior pituitary

    J. Steroid Biochem.

    (1972)
  • T. Minami et al.

    17β-Estradiol depolarization of hypothalamic neurons is mediated by cyclic AMP

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • F. Naftolin et al.

    The formation of estrogens by central neuroendocrine tissues

    Recent Prog. Horm. Res.

    (1975)
  • M. Nomura et al.

    Estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta) protein levels in neurons depend on estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) gene expression and on its ligand in a brain region-specific manner

    Mol. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • E.F. Rissman et al.

    Estrogen receptor functions as revealed by knockout studies: neuroendocrine and behavioral aspects

    Horm. Behav.

    (1997)
  • C.F. Roselli

    Brain aromatase: roles in reproduction and neuroprotection

    J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol.

    (2007)
  • P. Södersten

    Estrogen-activated sexual behavior in male rats

    Horm. Behav.

    (1973)
  • R.I. Wood

    Estradiol, but not dihydrotestosterone, in the MEA facilitates male hamster sex behavior

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1996)
  • R.I. Wood et al.

    The medial amygdaloid nucleus and medial pre-optic area mediate steroidal control of sexual behavior in the male Syrian hamster

    Horm. Behav.

    (1995)
  • H.B. Zhou et al.

    Analogs of methyl-piperidinopyrazole (MPP): antiestrogens with estrogen receptor alpha selective activity

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2009)
  • D. Zumpe et al.

    Behavioral responses to depo-provera, fadrozole and estradiol in castrated, testosterone-treated cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis): the involvement of progestin receptors

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1996)
  • I.M. Abraham et al.

    Critical in vivo roles for classical estrogen receptors in rapid estrogen actions on intracellular signaling in mouse brain

    Endocrinology

    (2004)
  • S. Ando et al.

    Physiological changes in androgen plasma levels with elapsing of time from castration in adult male rats

    Horm. Metab. Res.

    (1988)
  • M.J. Baum et al.

    Copulation in castrated male rats following combined treatment with estradiol and dihydrotestosterone

    Science

    (1973)
  • N.S. Canteras et al.

    Organization of projections from the medial nucleus of the amygdala: a PHAL study in the rat

    J. Comp. Neurol.

    (1995)
  • V.V. Chaban et al.

    A membrane estrogen receptor mediates intracellular calcium release in astrocytes

    Endocrinology

    (2004)
  • L.W. Christensen et al.

    Blockade of testosterone-induced mounting behavior in the male rat with intracranial application of the aromatization inhibitor, andros-1,4,6-triene-3,17-dione

    Endocrinology

    (1975)
  • A.N. Clancy et al.

    Sexual behavior and aggression in male mice: involvement of the vomeronasal system

    J. Neurosci.

    (1984)
  • A.N. Clancy et al.

    Intracerebral infusion of an aromatase inhibitor, sexual behavior and brain estrogen receptor-like immunoreactivity in intact male rats

    Neuroendocrinology

    (1995)
  • A. Coquelin et al.

    Pheromonally induced release of luteinizing hormone in male mice: involvement of the vomeronasal system

    J. Neurosci.

    (1984)
  • J.M. Davidson

    Activation of the male rat's sexual behavior by intracerebral implantation of androgen

    Endocrinology

    (1966)
  • J.M. Davidson

    Effects of estrogen on the sexual behavior of male rats

    Endocrinology

    (1969)
  • H.H. Feder

    The comparative actions of testosterone propionate and 5α-androstan-17β-ol-3-one propionate on the reproductive behaviour, physiology and morphology of male rats

    J. Endocrinol.

    (1971)
  • H.H. Feder et al.

    Male and female sexual responses in male rats given estradiol benzoate and 5 alpha-androstan-17 beta-ol-3-one propionate

    Endocrinology

    (1974)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Neuroestrogens in the control of sexual behavior: Past, present, and future

      2022, Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research
    • Hypothalamic cellular and molecular plasticity linked to sexual experience in male rats and mice

      2021, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
      Citation Excerpt :

      These signaling pathways have been shown to have different effects on the control of the different phases of copulatory behavior (Clancy et al., 1995). In the rat, inhibition of the AR greatly decreases all parameters of sexual behavior (McGinnis et al., 1996; Russell et al., 2012), whereas ERα inhibition only alters certain types of behavior occurring during the motivation phase (Gladue and Clemens, 1980; Vagell and McGinnis, 1998), and ERβ inhibition has no apparent effect, indicating a lack of involvement of this receptor in the control of sexual behavior (Sano et al., 2013). In mice, transgenic models, like ubiquitous KO, spontaneous mutant or KO restricted to the nervous system, made it possible to specify the importance of brain aromatase (Brooks et al., 2020), and the respective roles of the different receptors for the sex hormones, AR, ERα and ERβ (for review see (Mhaouty-Kodja, 2018).

    • Structure and function of the medial amygdala

      2020, Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conversely, within MApd, blocking ER or aromatase decreases male copulatory behavior (Huddleston, Paisley, & Clancy, 2006; Wood & Williams, 2001). Estrogens likely work through an interaction of ER-alpha and ER-beta receptor systems in MA as knockdown of ER-alpha does not reduce copulation (Paisley et al., 2012) nor can ER-alpha or ER-beta agonists alone support copulatory behavior (Russell et al., 2012) in rats. Similarly, in mice, knockdown of MApd ER-alpha or ER-beta alone or removal of aromatase neurons in adulthood does not alter copulation (Nakata et al., 2016; Sano et al., 2013; Unger et al., 2015), although ER-alpha in MA is required for the development of copulation (Sano et al., 2016).

    • Age-related changes in sexual function and steroid-hormone receptors in the medial preoptic area of male rats

      2017, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Lesions to the mPOA impair, while electrical stimulation facilitates, male sexual behavior (Liu et al., 1997; Rodríguez-Manzo et al., 2000). The mPOA is a site of hormone action in the control of sexual behavior (Russell et al., 2012; Wood and Williams, 2001), with a high density of steroid hormone receptors, including estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and androgen receptor (AR) (Dellovade et al., 1995; Pérez et al., 2003; Wu and Gore, 2009; Wu and Gore, 2010; Simerly et al., 1990). These ERα and AR sensitive cells in the mPOA are both activated by copulation (Gréco et al., 1998).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Participated equally in the conduct of this research.

    View full text