Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 38, Issue 9, September 2015, Pages 571-578
Journal home page for Trends in Neurosciences

Review
Demystifying cognitive flexibility: Implications for clinical and developmental neuroscience

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2015.07.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cognitive flexibility is essential for appropriate behavioral responses.

  • Neural correlates of cognitive flexibility include systems for executive control.

  • Cognitive flexibility undergoes protracted development and is impaired in disorders.

  • Neural flexibility and brain dynamics may underlie cognitive flexibility.

Cognitive flexibility, the readiness with which one can selectively switch between mental processes to generate appropriate behavioral responses, develops in a protracted manner and is compromised in several prevalent neurodevelopmental disorders. It is unclear whether cognitive flexibility arises from neural substrates distinct from the executive control network (ECN) or from the interplay of nodes within this and other networks. Here we review neuroimaging studies of cognitive flexibility, focusing on set shifting and task switching. We propose that more consistent operationalization and study of cognitive flexibility is required in clinical and developmental neuroscience. We suggest that an important avenue for future research is the characterization of the relationship between neural flexibility and cognitive flexibility in typical and atypical development.

Section snippets

Significance of cognitive flexibility

Cognitive flexibility is the ability to appropriately adjust one's behavior according to a changing environment 1, 2 (see Glossary). Cognitive flexibility enables an individual to work efficiently to disengage from a previous task, reconfigure a new response set, and implement this new response set to the task at hand. Greater cognitive flexibility is associated with favorable outcomes throughout the lifespan, such as better reading abilities in childhood [3], higher resilience to negative life

Defining and measuring cognitive flexibility

Cognitive flexibility can be particularly difficult to examine due to the multitude of ways it has been described in the literature. In some instances cognitive flexibility is discussed in the context of processes requiring shifts in attention (e.g., attentional flexibility [7], attention switching [8], attentional set shifting [9]). In others, it is operationalized by the tasks that are used to measure it (e.g., set shifting [10], task switching [11]).

Here we aim to more precisely define

EFs required for cognitive flexibility

Several subdomains of EF act coherently to successfully implement cognitive flexibility (Figure 1). In constantly changing environments, individuals must first identify how their surroundings have changed by directing attention to those elements that are in flux. After ascertaining that a previous strategy is not appropriate in the new environment, individuals must inhibit previous responses and reconfigure a new strategy. Individuals take in information and manipulate it in real time to

Brain networks underlying cognitive flexibility

Recent meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies of cognitive flexibility in neurotypical adults have identified a distributed network of frontoparietal regions involved in flexible switching, including high-level cortical association areas (vlPFC, dlPFC, anterior cingulate, right AI), the premotor cortex, the inferior and superior parietal cortices, the inferior temporal cortex, the occipital cortex, and subcortical structures such as the caudate and thalamus 26, 27. Ongoing work is attempting to

Delineating a cognitive flexibility network in the context of an ECN

Cognition is achieved through the interplay of anatomically separated and interconnected local networks defining large-scale networks subserving attention, language, memory, and other cognitive processes [38]. Network views of cognition and behavior currently dominate the cognitive neuroscience landscape 39, 40. Cognitive flexibility is likely to emerge from the interplay of specific nodes in the frontal and parietal cortices, all of which are necessary while each provides a relatively specific

Behavioral trajectories

Cognitive flexibility skills begin to develop in early childhood, with a sharp increase in abilities between 7 and 9 years of age. Cognitive flexibility becomes largely mature by 10 years of age [43] but skills continue to improve throughout adolescence and into adulthood 44, 45, reaching their peak between the ages of 21 and 30 years [46]. Components of EF involved in cognitive flexibility follow different developmental trajectories (Figure 3). Inhibition develops as early as 12 months and is

Executive dysfunction and cognitive inflexibility

The rudimentary versions of EF that emerge in infancy lay a foundation for the emergence of more mature EFs that underlie self-control. In middle childhood, executive dysfunction that was previously masked may become apparent as children begin to be challenged academically and socially [45]. In particular, decreased levels of cognitive flexibility and working memory are associated with a range of academic deficits from reading to science [3]. In adolescence, intact EF is demonstrated as the

Future directions: relating neural flexibility and brain dynamics to cognitive flexibility

An emerging literature suggests that brain signal variability, or neural variability, may represent a complex neural system capable of great dynamic range and an enhanced ability to efficiently process varied unexpected external stimuli [74]. Brains of older individuals exhibiting less consistent behavioral performance exhibit reduced variability of blood-oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal compared with brains of younger individuals [75]. These findings have led to the proposal that

Concluding remarks

Cognitive flexibility is a critical skill that enables individuals to accurately and efficiently respond in the face of changing environments. The specific interactions among key network nodes that are required to successfully implement cognitive flexibility continue to be characterized (Box 2). Important considerations need to be accounted for as researchers begin to examine the development of cognitive flexibility and its disruption in various disorders such as ASD. Taking into account

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by awards K01MH092288 and R01MH107549 from the National Institute of Mental Health, a Slifka/Ritvo Innovation in Autism Research Award, and a NARSAD Young Investigator Grant to L.Q.U.

Glossary

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD)
a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by core deficits in social interaction/communication and the presence of RRBs; those with ASD also have impaired cognitive flexibility 65, 69, 71, 72.
Cognitive flexibility
an emergent property of efficient EF; the ability to appropriately and efficiently adjust one's behavior according to a changing environment 1, 2, most commonly measured with task switching and set shifting tasks.
Dynamic functional connectivity
functional

References (89)

  • L.F. Barrett et al.

    Large-scale brain networks in affective and social neuroscience: towards an integrative functional architecture of the brain

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2013)
  • A.S. Dick

    The development of cognitive flexibility beyond the preschool period: an investigation using a modified Flexible Item Selection Task

    J. Exp. Child Psychol.

    (2014)
  • N. Chevalier

    Qualitative change in executive control during childhood and adulthood

    Cognition

    (2013)
  • F. Ezekiel

    Dimensional Change Card Sort performance associated with age-related differences in functional connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex

    Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2013)
  • C. Wendelken

    Flexible rule use: common neural substrates in children and adults

    Dev. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • M.J. Taylor

    fMRI and MEG in the study of typical and atypical cognitive development

    Neurophysiol. Clin.

    (2012)
  • E.G. Willcutt

    Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • J.A. Sergeant

    How specific is a deficit of executive functioning for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder?

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2002)
  • B.A. Corbett

    Examining executive functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and typical development

    Psychiatry Res.

    (2009)
  • K.M. Shafritz

    The neural circuitry mediating shifts in behavioral response and cognitive set in autism

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2008)
  • D.D. Garrett

    Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: a next frontier in human brain mapping?

    Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.

    (2013)
  • I. Dinstein

    Neural variability: friend or foe?

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2015)
  • C. Chang et al.

    Time–frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • R.M. Hutchison

    Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations

    Neuroimage

    (2013)
  • D.J.N. Armbruster

    Prefrontal cortical mechanisms underlying individual differences in cognitive flexibility and stability

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • W.A. Scott

    Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility

    Sociometry

    (1962)
  • P.M.E. de Abreu

    Executive functioning and reading achievement in school: a study of Brazilian children assessed by their teachers as ‘poor readers’

    Front. Psychol.

    (2014)
  • J.J. Genet et al.

    Flexible control in processing affective and non-affective material predicts individual differences in trait resilience

    Cogn. Emot.

    (2011)
  • J.C. Davis

    The independent contribution of executive functions to health related quality of life in older women

    BMC Geriatr.

    (2010)
  • V. Vilgis

    Executive function and attention in children and adolescents with depressive disorders: a systematic review

    Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry

    (2015)
  • B. Casey

    Early development of subcortical regions involved in non-cued attention switching

    Dev. Sci.

    (2004)
  • S. Konishi

    Transient activation of inferior prefrontal cortex during cognitive set shifting

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1998)
  • D. Badre et al.

    Computational and neurobiological mechanisms underlying cognitive flexibility

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2006)
  • B.E. Yerys

    Neural correlates of set-shifting in children with autism

    Autism Res.

    (2015)
  • S.A. Bunge et al.

    A brain-based account of the development of rule use in childhood

    Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci.

    (2006)
  • L.Q. Uddin

    Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2015)
  • L.Q. Uddin

    Dynamic reconfiguration of structural and functional connectivity across core neurocognitive brain networks with development

    J. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • M. Corbetta et al.

    Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain

    Nat. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • M.E. Thomason

    Development of spatial and verbal working memory capacity in the human brain

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (2009)
  • B.J. Levy et al.

    Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating

    Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
  • A.R. Aron et al.

    Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus

    J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • W. Cai

    Dissociable roles of right inferior frontal cortex and anterior insula in inhibitory control: evidence from intrinsic and task-related functional parcellation, connectivity, and response profile analyses across multiple datasets

    J. Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • W.W. Seeley

    Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control

    J. Neurosci.

    (2007)
  • A. Sebastian

    Dissociable attentional and inhibitory networks of dorsal and ventral areas of the right inferior frontal cortex: a combined task-specific and coordinate-based meta-analytic fMRI study

    Brain Struct. Funct.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (541)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text