Evidence for the role of the right auditory cortex in fine pitch resolution

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The neural basis of human pitch perception is not fully understood. It has been argued that the auditory cortices in the two hemispheres are specialized, such that certain right auditory cortical regions have a relatively finer resolution in the frequency domain than homologous regions in the left auditory cortex, but this concept has not been tested directly. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test this specific prediction. Healthy volunteers were scanned while passively listening to pure-tone melodic-like sequences in which the pitch distance between consecutive tones was varied in a parametric fashion. As predicted, brain activation in a region of right lateral auditory cortex, corresponding to the planum temporale, was linearly responsive to increasing pitch distance, even across the fine changes in pitch. In contrast, the BOLD signal at the homologous left cortical region was relatively constant as a function of pitch distance, except at the largest pitch change. The results support the model of relative hemispheric specialization and indicate that the right secondary auditory cortex has a finer pitch resolution than the left.

Introduction

Pitch is the perceptual correlate of acoustic frequency and can be considered along at least two perceptual dimensions, pitch height and pitch chroma (Shepard, 1982). Pitch height, is related to spectral energy distribution and is illustrated by the octave on the keyboard. In contrast, pitch chroma, or the cycle of notes within the octave, provides a basis for acoustic patterns (melodies). Several studies have investigated the processing of sequential or melodic pitch, which is critical for musical perception, however, its neural correlates are not fully understood.

Many findings have shown that musical pitch processing preferentially involves right auditory cortical structures. For example, studies of brain-lesioned patients have shown that the right auditory cortex is critical for melody discrimination (Milner, 1962), perception of missing fundamental pitch (Zatorre, 1988), perception of melody in terms of its global contour (Peretz, 1990), direction of pitch change (Johnsrude, Penhune, & Zatorre, 2000), and in using melodic contextual cues in pitch judgments (Warrier & Zatorre, 2004). Consistent evidence comes from neuroimaging studies of normal subjects, showing that right secondary auditory regions are central in various aspects of musical pitch processing, such as in melodic processing (Patterson, Uppenkamp, Johnsrude, & Griffiths, 2002; Zatorre, Evans, & Meyer, 1994), in the maintenance of pitch while singing (Perry et al., 1999), and in imagery for tunes (Halpern & Zatorre, 1999). In contrast, left auditory regions seem to be specialized for rapid temporal processing as required in speech (e.g. Belin et al., 1998; Jancke, Wustenberg, Scheich, & Heinze, 2002; Phillips & Farmer, 1990; Zaehle, Wustenberg, Meyer, & Jancke, 2004).

Zatorre, Belin, and Penhune (2002) have recently proposed that the auditory system has developed two parallel and complementary systems, one in each hemisphere, specialized for differential resolution in the spectral and temporal domains, as a need to optimally process incoming simultaneous spectral and temporal acoustic information from the environment. A similar proposition has been made by Poeppel (2003), who suggested that different time integration windows characterize the left and right auditory cortices. Support for this model of hemispheric asymmetry comes from neuropsychological (Robin, Tranel, & Damasio, 1990), electrophysiological (Liegeois-Chauvel, Giraud, Badier, Marquis, & Chauvel, 2001) and neuroimaging studies (Boemio, Fromm, Braun, & Poeppel, 2005; Brechmann & Scheich, 2005; Jamison, Watkins, Bishop, & Matthews, 2006; Schönwiesner, Rubsamen, & von Cramon, 2005; Zatorre & Belin, 2001). The present investigation was based on a study by Zatorre and Belin (2001), in which normal subjects were scanned while passively listening to pure-tone sequences that varied parametrically either in terms of spectral complexity or temporal rate. Pure-tones (or sine wave tones) are tones with a single frequency, in contrast to complex tones that are made up of multiple frequencies. Responses to the spectral features were weighted towards right auditory areas, whereas responses to the temporal features were weighted towards the left. These findings were interpreted as reflecting that the right auditory cortex has a finer spectral resolution, whereas the left has a higher temporal resolution, but this explanation was not tested directly, and it has not been universally accepted (Scott & Wise, 2004).

Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to test the prediction arising from the hemispheric specialization hypothesis that the right auditory cortex is more sensitive to small spectral changes relative to the left. Subjects were scanned while passively listening to pure-tone melodic-like sequences in which the pitch distance between consecutive tones was varied in a parametric fashion. We reasoned that if the right auditory cortex (particularly secondary auditory regions) has a higher resolution for spectral change, then it should show correlated changes in the BOLD response as a function of even small changes in the pitch of a pure-tone sequence; the left auditory cortex, should show increased BOLD response only to large changes in pitch. In other words, a high resolution for spectral change (as in the right auditory cortex) should result in a high sensitivity to small spectral changes, whereas a coarser spectral resolution (as in the left auditory cortex) should result in a lower sensitivity when stimulus frequency changes are small. This hypothesis is based on the assumption that there exist neural populations with frequency selectivity. We expand on this theory in Section 4.

Section snippets

Subjects

Ten healthy right-handed volunteers (half of each gender; mean age: 25.3; S.D.: 4.4 years) participated in the present study. All subjects were right-handed as assessed by an adapted form of the Edinburgh inventory (Oldfield, 1971). All subjects had normal hearing as determined via standard audiometric testing, and had no formal musical training. The present protocol was approved by the Montreal Neurological Institute Ethics Review Board, and has therefore been performed in accordance with the

Covariation analyses

The covariation analysis considering the BOLD response across the seven pitch distances revealed a peak activation lateral to the right primary auditory cortex, in the right PT (x = 64, y = −22, z = 4; t = 3.7; Fig. 4A). This right PT peak falls well within the probability map for the right PT as defined by Westbury et al. (1999) as indicated by the white outlines in Fig. 4A. In addition, there was an area of activation anterior to the right PT peak (x = 58, y = −12, z = 2; t = 3.3; Fig. 4A), though slightly

Relative functional asymmetry of the auditory cortex

In the present study, we aimed to test whether the right auditory cortex is more sensitive to small pitch changes relative to the left. As expected based on the hemispheric specialization hypothesis, we found that the right auditory cortex was indeed differentially responsive to small pitch changes, whereas the left was not. Both the covariation analyses and the contrast of all pitch-change conditions minus fixed pitch yielded significant activation specifically in the right PT, lateral to HG.

Conclusion

The present data provide further evidence for the preferential involvement of right secondary auditory areas in the processing of sequential pitch information. The results are consistent with the predictions derived from the tradeoff model of relative hemispheric specialization, and provide more direct evidence than available previously that the secondary auditory cortices in the two hemispheres differ in their spectral resolution.

Acknowledgements

We thank Marc Schönwiesner for his helpful comments on this manuscript, Marc Bouffard and Pierre Ahad for their expertise and assistance, as well as the staff of the McConnell Brain Imaging Centre. This work was supported by funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

References (40)

  • S.K. Scott et al.

    The functional neuroanatomy of prelexical processing in speech perception

    Cognition

    (2004)
  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    A general statistical analysis for fMRI data

    Neuroimage

    (2002)
  • R.J. Zatorre et al.

    Structure and function of auditory cortex: Music and speech

    Trends in Cognitive Sciences

    (2002)
  • P. Belin et al.

    Lateralization of speech and auditory temporal processing

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1998)
  • D. Bendor et al.

    The neuronal representation of pitch in primate auditory cortex

    Nature

    (2005)
  • A. Boemio et al.

    Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices

    Nature Neuroscience

    (2005)
  • A. Brechmann et al.

    Hemispheric shifts of sound representation in auditory cortex with conceptual listening

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2005)
  • D.L. Collins et al.

    Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space

    Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

    (1994)
  • T.A. Hackett et al.

    Architectonic identification of the core region in auditory cortex of macaques, chimpanzees, and humans

    Journal of Comparative Neurology

    (2001)
  • D.A. Hall et al.

    Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex

    Cerebral Cortex

    (2002)
  • Cited by (185)

    • Basics of the brain and perception

      2024, The Neuroscience of Bach's Music: Perception, Action, and Cognition Effects on the Brain
    • Music processing and amusia

      2022, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
    • Context-dependent Plasticity and Strength of Subcortical Encoding of Musical Sounds Independently Underlie Pitch Discrimination for Music Melodies

      2021, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is beyond the current study’s scope whether the associations between the subcortical sound encoding features and music pitch perception are products of corticofugal modulations or emerge purely from local subcortical circuits. It is well-known that the pitch processing network includes multiple brain regions, particularly the right auditory cortex (Hyde et al., 2008; Coffey et al., 2016; Bianchi et al., 2017), and that subcortical sound encoding is modulated by online top-down modulations (Suga and Ma, 2003). However, it is also well-known that the subcortical auditory nuclei are connected complicatedly and project excitatory and inhibitory modulations to each other (Palmer, 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text