Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 24, Issue 2, 15 January 2005, Pages 332-338
NeuroImage

Cerebrocerebellar networks during articulatory rehearsal and verbal working memory tasks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.032Get rights and content

Converging evidence has implicated the cerebellum in verbal working memory. The current fMRI study sought to further characterize cerebrocerebellar participation in this cognitive process by revealing regions of activation common to a verbal working task and an articulatory control task, as well as regions that are uniquely activated by working memory. Consistent with our model's predictions, load-dependent activations were observed in Broca's area (BA 44/6) and the superior cerebellar hemisphere (VI/CrusI) for both working memory and motoric rehearsal. In contrast, activations unique to verbal working memory were found in the inferior parietal lobule (BA 40) and the right inferior cerebellum hemisphere (VIIB). These findings provide evidence for two cerebrocerebellar networks for verbal working memory: a frontal/superior cerebellar articulatory control system and a parietal/inferior cerebellar phonological storage system.

Introduction

Current models of verbal working memory (Baddeley, 1986, Baddeley, 1992) postulate a phonological loop for the short-term maintenance of verbal information. This loop is assumed to be composed of two components, a phonological store, which can hold speech-related information for 1–2 s, and an articulatory control process, which serves to subvocally refresh the contents of the phonological store. Evidences from both neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have suggested that left prefrontal regions corresponding to Broca's area are likely involved in the articulatory control process, whereas left inferior parietal cortex is the likely locus of the phonological store (Awh et al., 1996, Fiez et al., 1996, Jonides et al., 1998, Paulesu et al., 1993, Smith and Jonides, 1998).

In a previous investigation (Desmond et al., 1997), we identified two cerebellar regions activated in verbal working memory: a bilateral superior region located in the hemisphere of lobule VI/Crus I, and an inferior region located in right hemispheral VIIB. For both a verbal working memory and a motoric rehearsal task (one that had similar letter encoding and subvocal articulatory requirements as the verbal working memory task but no storage requirements for the verbal information), load-dependent activation was observed in the superior cerebellum. In contrast, load-dependent inferior cerebellar activation was observed only for the working memory task. We then formulated a cerebrocerebellar model of verbal working memory based on this pattern of activation, as well as neuroanatomical evidence of corticopontine and pontocerebellar patterns of projections. Specifically, several studies in primates have indicated that corticopontine projections from frontal regions tend to be distributed along medial portions of the pontine nuclei (Brodal, 1978, Leichnetz et al., 1984, Schmahmann, 1996, Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997a, Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997b, Wiesendanger et al., 1979), whereas parietal and temporal regions project to lateral pontine regions (Brodal, 1978, Brodal and Bjaalie, 1997, Leichnetz et al., 1984, May and Andersen, 1986, Schmahmann, 1996, Schmahmann and Pandya, 1989, Schmahmann and Pandya, 1991, Weber and Yin, 1984, Wiesendanger et al., 1979). Medial pontine nuclei in turn have been shown to project to superior portions of cerebellar cortex, including the simplex lobule (hemispheric lobule VI) and Crus I (superior part of hemispheric lobule VIIA), whereas lateral regions of pontine nuclei project to the paramedian lobule (hemispheric lobule VIIB) (Brodal, 1979, Brodal, 1982, Glickstein et al., 1994). We hypothesized that the superior cerebellar activation reflected the articulatory control process from frontal regions and that the inferior cerebellar activation reflected phonological storage from parietal regions. Because the study of Desmond et al. (1997) was confined to the cerebellum, a comparison of activations in the working memory and motoric rehearsal tasks in both neocortex and cerebellum was not possible.

Thus, the purpose of the present study was to extend these previous findings and characterize regions of activation common to verbal working memory and motoric rehearsal, as well as regions that are unique to verbal working memory, in both neocortex and cerebellum. Based on the above model of cerebrocerebellar interactions for verbal working memory (Desmond, 2001, Desmond et al., 1997), we predicted that the high or low load comparison for both verbal working memory and motoric rehearsal would activate Broca's area and superior cerebellum, reflecting common use of the articulatory control system in both tasks. In contrast, because phonological storage is required only for the verbal working memory task, we expected left parietal and right inferior cerebellar activations to be unique to the verbal working memory task.

Section snippets

Subjects

Seventeen healthy, right-handed male (n = 8) and female (n = 9) subjects gave their informed consent to participate in this study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Stanford University. The mean age of the subjects was 28.6 years ± 7.4 (SD).

Stimuli

Stimuli were generated from a Macintosh computer (Apple Computer, Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) using PsyScope software (Cohen et al., 1993) and were visually presented to the subject in the scanner by back-projecting the images, via a

Behavioral performance

For the motoric rehearsal task (Fig. 1A), subjects correctly pressed a button when instructed to do so on 98.3% of the low load trials and on 99.5% of the high load trials. The difference in response rate was not significant. Likewise, median reaction times for the button presses did not significantly differ for the high load (mean = 483.1 ± 110.6 ms SD) or the low load (468.3 ± 120.3 ms SD) conditions.

For the working memory task (Fig. 1B), subjects accurately responded to the probe letter on

Discussion

The results of the present investigation confirm and extend those of Desmond et al. (1997) and demonstrate that greater high-relative to low-load superior cerebellar hemispheric activation in lobule VI/Crus I is observed for both the working memory task and the motoric rehearsal task. Although bilateral superior cerebellar activation was observed, both the magnitude and extent of the activation was greater on the right side (Table 1). Inferior right hemispheric cerebellar activation in lobule

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Michelle Pryor for project coordination. A preliminary report of these data has appeared in abstract form. Supported by NIMH (MH60234).

References (53)

  • E.H. Schumacher et al.

    PET evidence for an amodal verbal working memory system

    NeuroImage

    (1996)
  • D.J. Veltman et al.

    Maintenance versus manipulation in verbal working memory revisited: an fMRI study

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • H. Ackermann et al.

    Speech deficits in ischaemic cerebellar lesions

    J. Neurol.

    (1992)
  • G.I. Allen et al.

    Cerebrocerebellar communication systems

    Physiol. Rev.

    (1974)
  • G. Allen et al.

    Attentional activation of the cerebellum independent of motor involvement

    Science

    (1997)
  • E. Awh et al.

    Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: evidence from positron emission tomography

    Psychol. Sci.

    (1996)
  • A.D. Baddeley

    Working Memory

    (1986)
  • A. Baddeley

    Working memory

    Science

    (1992)
  • P. Brodal

    The corticopontine projection in the rhesus monkey. Origin and principles of organization

    Brain

    (1978)
  • P. Brodal

    The cerebropontocerebellar pathway: salient features of its organization

    Exp. Brain Res., Suppl.

    (1982)
  • J.M. Chein et al.

    Dissociation of verbal working memory system components using a delayed serial recall task

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2001)
  • D.M. Clower et al.

    The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    PsyScope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments

    Behav. Res. Meth. Instrum. Comput.

    (1993)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1994)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task

    Nature

    (1997)
  • R. Courtemanche et al.

    Local field potential oscillations in primate cerebellar cortex: modulation during active and passive expectancy

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (304)

    • Altered Cerebellar Oscillations in Parkinson's Disease Patients during Cognitive and Motor Tasks

      2021, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      Studies on cerebellar theta oscillations indicate that our method may be engaging resonant frequencies in cerebellar networks that favor cognitive processing. Moreover, neuromodulation in the cerebellar region can increase theta activity and thus improve cognitive functions (Schutter and van Honk, 2006; Singh et al., 2019), possibly by inducing long-lasting changes in the interconnected cortico-cerebellar networks in the disease condition (Chen and Desmond, 2005; Koch, 2010; Brissenden et al., 2018). Low-frequency theta oscillations can engage not only cortical and cerebellar regions, but also basal ganglia regions such as the subthalamic nucleus as well as other brain areas (Herz et al., 2016; Kelley et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text